DOCSLIB.ORG

Exposure and Risk to Non-Target Receptors for Agricultural

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exposure and Risk to Non-Target Receptors for Agricultural EXPOSURE AND RISK TO NON-TARGET RECEPTORS FOR AGRICULTURAL SPRAY DRIFT OF FORMULATION TYPES AND ADJUVANTS by Collin James Preftakes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana July 2017 ©COPYRIGHT by Collin James Preftakes 2017 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION To my grandfather, Dr. Marcel J. Kniedler (Nonno). iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to begin by thanking my advisor, Dr. Robert Peterson for his mentorship, guidance, and friendship that have been invaluable throughout this process. I am also extremely grateful to the other members of my committee, Dr. Jerome Schleier III, Dr. David Weaver, and Dr. John Martin for their expertise and insightful questions along the way. My parents, Nadine and James Preftakes, and my siblings, Justin, Katie, Heidi, Meggie, and Cori have shared in this experience as much as anyone. Their support and encouragement has been my greatest asset throughout this degree and throughout my life. My fiancé, Dayane Reis, has been especially instrumental in keeping me grounded and I am incredibly fortunate to have had her companionship in this pursuit. I am also very fortunate to have shared my experience as a graduate student with Dr. Chris Brown, Alyssa Piccolomini, Clair Donahoo, and Shavonn Whiten who were so much more than lab-mates. Thanks to João Rossi for graciously helping me with statistics during multiple weekends, and to my incredible group of friends for whom I would be lost without. My sincere thanks to the staff at the DAS Western U.S. Research Center where my experimental field work took place. That work would not have been possible without the help of Dr. Byron Sleugh, Dr. Joe Armstrong, Dr. Claudia Kuniyoshi, Dr. Cristiane Müller, Noemi Thompson, Marc Muzio, Garrick Stuhr, and all the summer interns. A special thanks to Dr. Scott Hutchins and Dr. Monica Sorribas for advocating on my behalf at Dow AgroSciences, from which financial support was generously provided. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................1 Pesticides and Drift ..........................................................................................................1 Droplet Size as a Predictor of Spray Drift .......................................................................2 Causes of Drift .................................................................................................................4 Operator-Controlled Variables Affecting Drift ...............................................................4 Formulation and Adjuvant .......................................................................................4 Nozzle Type and Spray Pressure .............................................................................8 Driving Speed and Boom Height .............................................................................9 Non-Operator-Controlled Variables Affecting Drift .......................................................9 Wind Speed and Atmospheric Stability .................................................................10 Evaporation of Airborne Droplets .........................................................................11 Measuring and Predicting Drift .....................................................................................12 Ecotoxicology and Environmental Risk Assessment for Pesticide Drift ......................15 Research Objectives ......................................................................................................18 References .....................................................................................................................20 2. EFFECT OF INSECTICIDE FORMULATION AND ADJUVANT COMBINATION ON AGRICULTURAL SPRAY DRIFT ....................26 Contribution of Authors and Co-authors .......................................................................26 Manuscript Information Page ........................................................................................27 Abstract .........................................................................................................................28 Introduction ...................................................................................................................29 Methods .........................................................................................................................32 Results ...........................................................................................................................42 Ground Deposition .................................................................................................42 Vertical Deposition ................................................................................................46 Biological Efficacy ................................................................................................48 Discussion .....................................................................................................................49 Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................53 References .....................................................................................................................71 3. NON-TARGET INSECT RISK ASSESSMENT OF DRIFT REDUCTION INSECTICIDE FORMULATIONS AND SPRAY ADJUVANTS ...............................75 Contribution of Authors and Co-authors ........................................................................75 Manuscript Information Page .........................................................................................76 Abstract ...........................................................................................................................77 v TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED Introduction .....................................................................................................................78 Methods...........................................................................................................................81 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................................86 Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................93 References .....................................................................................................................101 4. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................104 CUMULATIVE REFERENCES .....................................................................................108 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1. Sample areas for in-swath and downwind ground deposition samplers. ...........................................................................54 2.2 Application rates of Rhodamine-WT (RWT) for each treatment ............................................................................................55 2.3 Summary statistics for numerical variables .....................................................56 2.4 Coefficient estimates and SEs for selected ground deposition model ..............................................................................................57 2.5 Slope coefficients for interaction terms in regression models for ground deposition and volume median diameter ...........................58 2.6 Coefficient estimates and SEs for selected VMD model .................................59 2.7 Slope coefficients for interaction terms in regression models for ground deposition and volume median diameter ...........................60 2.8 Droplet size data from wind tunnel test with treatments ordered by ground deposition from the field study ..........................................61 S2.1 Recovery Rate of Rhodamine-WT for drift study .........................................67 S2.2 Mean Rhodamine-WT deposition on swath plates represented as a percentage of amount applied ..............................................68 S2.3 Ground deposition with increasing distance from the field edge as a percentage of Rhodamine-WT or a.i. applied ........................69 S2.4 Ground deposition of active ingredient with increasing distance from the field edge. .........................................................70 3.1 Acute sensitivity of terrestrial insects to spinosad from published ingestion bioassays. ................................................................94 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1 Field layout for drift experiment in Fresno, CA ..............................................62 2.2 Predicted ground deposition of Rhodamine-WT as a function of distance at average RH and wind speed ........................................63 2.3. Predicted ground deposition of Rhodamine-WT as a function of wind speed at average RH and a distance of 1 meter ....................64 2.4 Droplet size by height ......................................................................................65 2.5 Interaction between VMD and Wind speed .....................................................66 3.1 Species sensitivity distribution of acute mortality (LC50) for terrestrial insect species exposed to spinosad through ingestion ...............97 3.2 Residue by distance data superimposed on SSD to show PAF for treatments at 5 m in a short grass environment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition
    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Part a Risk Management
    REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management Product name(s): ISOMATE-CLR MAX Chemical active substance(s): E,E-8,10 dodecadienol (codlemone), 153 mg/dispenser or 392 g/kg Dodecanol, 22 mg/dispenser or 57 g/kg Tetradecanol, 5 mg/dispenser or 14 g/kg Z-11-Tetradecenyl acetate, 150 mg/dispenser or 385 g/kg Z-9-Tetradecenyl acetate, 30 mg/dispenser or 77 g/kg Southern Zone zonal Rapporteur Member State: France NATIONAL ASSESSMENT FRANCE (authorisation) Applicant: SUMI AGRO France zRMS Finalisation date: 2017-09-25 ISOMATE-CLR MAX Page 2 /23 Part A - National Assessment FRANCE Table of Contents 1 Details of the application ............................................................................. 4 1.1 Application background ................................................................................. 4 1.2 Letters of Access ............................................................................................ 5 1.3 Justification for submission of tests and studies ............................................ 5 1.4 Data protection claims ................................................................................... 5 2 Details of the authorisation decision .......................................................... 5 2.1 Product identity .............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Substances of concern for national monitoring ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera), with Notes on the Chromosomes of Two Other Allied Species'
    JAPAN. J. GENETICS Vol. 41, No. 4: 275-278 (1966) THE CHROMOSOMES OF TWO TORTRICIDSPECIES (LEPIDOPTERA), WITH NOTES ON THE CHROMOSOMES OF TWO OTHER ALLIED SPECIES' KAZUO SAITOH Department of Biology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki Received January 6, 1966 Tortricid moths are well known as pests of plants. It is widely recognized in Aomori Prefecture that their larvae give damage to apple trees. The survey work of chromosomes in harmful insects may be of some value in view of economic importance. The author (Saitoh 1960) previously carried out cytological researches of two species of tortricid moths, Archips breviplicana and Adoxophyes orana, inhabiting in Aomori Prefecture, and established the haploid chromosome numbers. The present paper deals with studies on Archips fuscocupreana and Pandemis heparana, with some reference to caryotypes of the tortricid moths so far reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS The insect samples used for this study were furnished through the courtesy of the Aomori Apple Experiment Station, Kuroishi City. Testes derived from mature lar- vae or prepupae of Archips fuscocupreana and Pandemis heparana, as well as larval testes of Archips breviplicana and Adoxophyes orana, were fixed with Allen's P. F. A.- 3 mixture. Slides were made according to the usual paraffin method, and stained with Heidenhain's iron haematoxylin. Chromosome counts were carried out with clear-cut metaphase spermatocytes, and the chromosomes were drawn with the aid of an Abbe's drawing apparatus at table level, at a magnification of 100 objective x K 20 ocular. RESULTS 1. Chromosomes of Archips fuscocupreana Walsingham (Midare-ha kumon-hamaki) (Figs. 1-8) Counts were made in 185 primary spermatocytes and in 81 secondary spermatocytes derived from the testes of 15 mature larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (236Kb)
    Chapter (non-refereed) Welch, R.C.. 1981 Insects on exotic broadleaved trees of the Fagaceae, namely Quercus borealis and species of Nothofagus. In: Last, F.T.; Gardiner, A.S., (eds.) Forest and woodland ecology: an account of research being done in ITE. Cambridge, NERC/Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, 110-115. (ITE Symposium, 8). Copyright © 1981 NERC This version available at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/7059/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the authors and/or other rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access This document is extracted from the publisher’s version of the volume. If you wish to cite this item please use the reference above or cite the NORA entry Contact CEH NORA team at [email protected] 110 The fauna, including pests, of woodlands and forests 25. INSECTS ON EXOTIC BROADLEAVED jeopardize Q. borealis here. Moeller (1967) suggest- TREES OF THE FAGACEAE, NAMELY ed that the general immunity of Q. borealis to QUERCUS BOREALIS AND SPECIES OF insect attack in Germany was due to its planting in NOTHOFAGUS mixtures with other Quercus spp. However, its defoliation by Tortrix viridana (green oak-roller) was observed in a relatively pure stand of 743 R.C. WELCH hectares. More recently, Zlatanov (1971) published an account of insect pests on 7 species of oak in Bulgaria, including Q. rubra (Table 35), although Since the early 1970s, and following a number of his lists include many pests not known to occur earlier plantings, it seems that American red oak in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and Evolutionary Correlates of Novel Secondary Sexual Structures
    Zootaxa 3729 (1): 001–062 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3729.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA0C1355-FF3E-4C67-8F48-544B2166AF2A ZOOTAXA 3729 Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures JASON J. DOMBROSKIE1,2,3 & FELIX A. H. SPERLING2 1Cornell University, Comstock Hall, Department of Entomology, Ithaca, NY, USA, 14853-2601. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, T6G 2E9 3Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by J. Brown: 2 Sept. 2013; published: 25 Oct. 2013 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 JASON J. DOMBROSKIE & FELIX A. H. SPERLING Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures (Zootaxa 3729) 62 pp.; 30 cm. 25 Oct. 2013 ISBN 978-1-77557-288-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-289-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2013 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2013 Magnolia Press 2 · Zootaxa 3729 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press DOMBROSKIE & SPERLING Table of contents Abstract . 3 Material and methods . 6 Results . 18 Discussion . 23 Conclusions . 33 Acknowledgements . 33 Literature cited . 34 APPENDIX 1. 38 APPENDIX 2. 44 Additional References for Appendices 1 & 2 . 49 APPENDIX 3. 51 APPENDIX 4. 52 APPENDIX 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Pests in Northwestern Washington Prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS Survey of Apple Trees to Identify All Leaf-Feeding Apple Pests Currently in Whatcom County
    6. Biology / Phenology a. Biology 1. Exotic Fruit Tree Pests in Whatcom County, Washington Eric LaGasa Plant Services Div., Wash. St. Dept. of Agriculture P.O. Box 42560, Olympia, Washington 98504-2560 (360) 902-2063 [email protected] The Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) has conducted detection surveys and other field projects for exotic pests since the mid-1980's, with funding provided by the USDA/ APHIS Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) program. Recent discovery of several exotic fruit tree pests in northwestern Washington prompted a 1994-1995 CAPS survey of apple trees to identify all leaf-feeding apple pests currently in Whatcom County. Additional exotic apple pest species, new to either the region or U.S. were discovered. This paper presents some brief descriptions of species detected in that project, and other exotic fruit tree pest species discovered in northwest Washington since 1985. Table 1. - Exotic Fruit Tree Pests New to Northwestern Washington State - 1985 to 1995 green pug moth - Geometridae: Chloroclystis rectangulata (L.) An early, persistent European pest of apple, pear, cherry and other fruit trees. Larvae attack buds, blossoms, and leaves from March to June. Damage to blossoms causes considerable deformation of fruit. Larvae are common in apple blossoms in Whatcom County, where it was first reared from apple trees in 1994. This pest, new to North America, was also recently detected in the northeastern U.S. Croesia holmiana - Tortricidae: Croesia holmiana (L.) A common pest of many fruit trees and ornamental plants in Europe and Asia, where it is considered a minor problem. Spring larval feeding affects only leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Leafrollers (Lepidoptera) on Berry Crops in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia
    J. E\'Tml()l.. Soc. 13 nIT. Cor.l" "ll.\ 70 (l OR2). DI·:c . .31. 10R2 3 1 table fo r markct. Once in the heads the aphids are occm common'" on lettuce in H.C. but th es' Ilsual'" d rtuall \' impossible to contact with foliar spras·s. breed on the u~de rs i d c of the outer Icas·c:s. whe r ~ Large populations \\·ould . of course. calise dircct thes' do not contaminate the saleable crop. d amage bs' their feeding and deposits of hones' dc\\". The lettuce aphid is now the most important in­ T his aphid is also a potential threat as a s'cctor of sect p,,,·t of lettuce in Brit ish Coluillbia. T he present lettuce- infeetin.l!; s' iruscs, es pecial'" cucu lllbcr outbreak demonstrates the ineffectis'eness of cur­ mosa ic and perhaps beet western s·ell o\\·s. S. rent"· recomlllcnded control strategies. Conse­ rib isl1igri is reported to be unahlc to transm it lettuce quentls·. extensis'e monitoring of aphid populations mosaic (Kenncc"·. Das' and F.astop. 1062). and field tests to eS'aluate the efficacs' of seH'ral Other species of aphids. especial'" the green aphicides including some promising sS'stemies are in pcach aphid. Mlj;:' ll.> pcrsical' (Sulzer). and the progress. Special attention is being gis'en to op­ potato aphid, Alacrnsiph II III cllphorviac (Thomas). timlllll timing and placcment of spras·s. HEFERENCES Forbes. A. H.. 13 . D. Frazer and II. R. ,\ l aeCarth~ ·. HJ73. The aphids (Homoptcra : Aphididae) of British Columbia.!. A basic taxonomic list.
    [Show full text]
  • Toby Austin's Garden Moth List
    Toby Austin’s Garden Moth List Orange Swift Triodia sylvina Common Swift Korscheltellus lupulinus Ghost Moth Hepialus humuli Nematopogon swammerdamella Cork Moth Nemapogon cloacella Tinea trinotella Horse-chestnut Leaf-miner Cameraria ohridella Bird-cherry Ermine Yponomeuta evonymella Orchard/Apple/Spindle Ermine Yponomeuta padella/malinellus/cagnagella Willow Ermine Yponomeuta rorrella Yponomeuta plumbella Ypsolopha ustella Diamond-back Moth Plutella xylostella Plutella porrectella Ash Bud Moth Prays fraxinella Hawthorn Moth Scythropia crataegella Oegoconia quadripuncta/caradjai/deauratella Crassa unitella Carcina quercana Luquetia lobella Agonopterix alstromeriana Mompha sturnipennella Blastobasis adustella Blastobasis lacticolella Twenty-plume Moth Alucita hexadactyla Beautiful Plume Amblyptilia acanthadactyla Stenoptilia pterodactyla Stenoptilia bipunctidactyla Common Plume Emmelina monodactyla Variegated Golden Tortrix Archips xylosteana Argyrotaenia ljungiana Chequered Fruit-tree Tortrix Pandemis corylana Dark Fruit-tree Tortrix Pandemis heparana Pandemis dumetana Syndemis musculana Lozotaenia forsterana Carnation Tortrix Cacoecimorpha pronubana Light Brown Apple Moth Epiphyas postvittana Lozotaeniodes formosana Summer Fruit Tortrix Adoxophyes orana Flax Tortrix Cnephasia asseclana Green Oak Tortrix Tortrix viridana Cochylis molliculana Cochylis atricapitana Acleris holmiana Acleris forsskaleana Acleris comariana/laterana Acleris cristana Garden Rose Tortrix Acleris variegana Pseudargyrotoza conwagana Phtheochroa rugosana Agapeta
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on APPLES – Fruit Pathway and Alert List
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 5 - REPORT on APPLES – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Wistermann A, Steffen K, Grousset F, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/107o25ccc1b2c DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background on apple .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Data on production and trade of apple fruit ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Pathway ‘apple fruit’ .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kaolin As a Possible Treatment Against Lepidopteran Larvae and Mites in Organic Fruit Production
    Kaolin as a possible treatment against lepidopteran larvae and mites in organic fruit production G. Jaastad 1, D. Røen 2, Å-M. Helgheim 1, B. Hovland 1 and O. Opedal 1 Abstract Few control methods are available in Norwegian organic fruit production that can prevent damage by early and late larvae. Also phytophagous mites are difficult to control without harming the beneficial mites. Proc- essed kaolin function by coating trees and thus creating a physical barrier to infestation, impeding move- ment, feeding and egg-laying. Kaolin may reduce feeding and movement of over-wintering tortricide larvae and other larvae that hatch early in spring and have a repellent effect against egg-laying tortricide females in summer. Kaolin may also have a control effect against mites as it clings to the body and reduce feeding. Tri- als with kaolin were conducted in 2003, 2004 and 2005 in plum and apple orchards. Results show that kaolin reduces the population of rust mite, however it also affected the number of beneficial mites. The effect against early and late larvae was more variable. Treatments with kaolin resulted in a small reduction in early larvae and damage in some fields and years, however no clear effect against late larvae was found. The ef- fect of kaolin will be discussed in relation to population size and number of treatments. Keywords : kaolin, Surround , rust mite, Lepidoptera larvae, beneficial mite Introduction Both noctuid, geometrid and tortricid larvae may damage shoots, leaves and fruits in apple, pear and plum production. Most lepidopteran larvae damaging fruit trees in Norway hatch from eggs early in spring, however some species of tortricids hatch in early autumn and over-winter as young larvae in fruit trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic Versus Introduced Species in North America
    insects Article Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic versus Introduced Species in North America Todd M. Gilligan 1,*, John W. Brown 2 and Joaquín Baixeras 3 1 USDA-APHIS-PPQ-S&T, 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA 2 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA; [email protected] 3 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Carrer Catedràtic José Beltran, 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 August 2020; Accepted: 29 August 2020; Published: 3 September 2020 Simple Summary: The family Tortricidae includes approximately 11,500 species of small moths, many of which are economically important pests worldwide. A large number of tortricid species have been inadvertently introduced into North America from Eurasia, and many have the potential to inflict considerable negative economic and ecological impacts. Because native species behave differently than introduced species, it is critical to distinguish between the two. Unfortunately, this can be a difficult task. In the past, many tortricids discovered in North America were assumed to be the same as their Eurasian counterparts, i.e., Holarctic. Using DNA sequence data, morphological characters, food plants, and historical records, we analyzed the origin of 151 species of Tortricidae present in North America. The results indicate that the number of Holarctic species has been overestimated by at least 20%. We also determined that the number of introduced tortricids in North America is unexpectedly high compared other families, with tortricids accounting for approximately 23–30% of the total number of moth and butterfly species introduced to North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Endel.Pdf (1.925Mb)
    Master’s Thesis 2020 60 ECTS Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management Tortricid pests (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple orchards of South-Eastern Norway surveyed by pheromone-baited traps Branislav Endel Ecology Acknowledgments I would like to thank my supervisors, Nina Trandem, Gunnhild Jaastad, and Bjørn Arild Hatteland from Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, who have offered me their advice and guidance through each stage of the process. I would also like to thank to Jop Westplate and Gaute Myren from the Norwegian Agricultural Advisory Service for their generous help and practical advices in the field. My thanks go to Leif Aarvik from Natural History Museum, the University of Oslo for providing me additional information. I am grateful to Peter Horváth, a postgraduate of my previous university, and other former and current classmates for helping me with solving various problems concerning studying in Norway. I am also obligated to Conrad Riepl for his detailed proofreading of the final version of the thesis. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås May 2020 Branislav Endel i Abstract The trend of minimizing pesticide usage in agriculture leads scientists to think about alternatives of how pest numbers can be reduced. The tortricid moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is a group of insects responsible for great damage in fruit orchards. Efficient models for predicting damage by these moths have so far mainly been developed for the most serious world-wide apple pest, the codling moth Cydia pomonella. Such forecasting models are not well-established for other tortricids and recent data on their status in Norwegian conditions are scare.
    [Show full text]