VOL. 2

Public Disclosure Authorized FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA ETHIOPIAN ROADS AUTHORITY

WOLKITE - HOSAINA ROAD PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

March 2009

FINAL RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN STUDY REPOR Public Disclosure Authorized in JV CORE CONSULTlNG ENGINEERS METAFERIA CONSULTING with PLC ENGINEERS PLC Tel 25 1-1 1-5504694. 550-0954, 551-5647, 551- P.,O. Box 2505 7420 TEI.,:25 1 - 1 1 3 - 206032 Fax: 251-1 1-551-4466 FAX:25 1 -1 13 - 206033 E-mail : [email protected] E-mail : [email protected] ADDlS ABABA, ETHIOPIA ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

March 2009

Ethiopian Roads Authority

Project Name: Wolkite Hossaina Road Upgrading Project SIGNATURE:

Document Type: Resettlement Action Plan

Prepared by: Abdulahi Mohammed Yimam

Reviewed by : Eshete Mulat

Approved by: Tlleaderl Director: Eshete Mulat

Checked and received by: Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Executive Summary ...... iv 1. INTRODUCTION ...... I 1. 1 Background...... 1 1.2 Objective of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) ...... 1 1.3 Methodology ...... 2 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ROAD PROJECT...... 5 3. POLICY. LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 6 3.1 Policies ...... 6 3.1.1 Economic policy ...... 6 3.1.2 The National Population Policy ...... 6 3.1.3 Environmental Policies ...... 6 3.1.4 National Policy on Women ...... 7 3.1.5 Health Policy of Ethiopia ...... 7 3.1.6 HIVIAIDS Prevention and Control in the Work Places of ERA ...... 7 3.1 .7 Water Resource Management Policy of Ethiopia ...... 8 3.1.8 Biodiversity Policy ...... 8 3.1.9 Wildlife policy ...... 8 3.1.1 0 Education Policy ...... 9 3.1.1 1 Road Sector Development program ...... 9 3.1 .12 Regional Policy...... 9 3.1.13 The World Bank Resettlement policy ...... 10 3.1.14 Comparison between national law on land use and Bank OP 4.12 .. 12 3.1.15 The Ethiopian Roads Authority's Resettlement1Rehabilitation Policy.. 12 3.2 Legal...... 13 3.2.1 The Federal Constitution...... 13 3.2.2 Legislation on Expropriation of Land & Compensation ...... 14 3.2.3 Involuntary Resettlement ...... 15 3.2.4 Environmental Framework Legislation ...... 16 3.2.4.1 Proclamation on Establishment of Environmental Protection ...... 16 3.2.4.2 Proclamation on Environmental Impact Assessment ...... 16 3.2.4.3 Proclamation on Environmental Pollution Control ...... 17 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

3.2.4.4 Proclamation on Conservation. Development and Utilization of Forests 17 3.2.4.5 Proclamation on Rural Land Administration and Land Use...... 17 3.3 Institutional and Administrative Framework ...... 18 3.3.1 Federal and Regional Administration ...... 18 3.3.2 Environmental Protection Authority ...... 18 3.3.3 Environmental Protection Unit ...... 19 3.3.4 Regional Environmental Agencies ...... 19 3.3.5 Ethiopian Roads Authority ...... 19 3.3.6 World Bank ...... 20

4 . STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATUIONS ...... 21 4.1 THE RAP DISCLOSURE ...... 22 5. DESCRIPTION OF BASELINE CONDITION...... 24 5.1 Socio-Economic Environment ...... 24 5.1.1 Demography. Ethnicity and Religion ...... 24 5.2 Economic Activities ...... 25 5.2.1 Major Economic Activity ...... 25 5.2.2 Agriculture ...... 26 5.2.3 Household income ...... 27 5.3 Social and Economic services ...... 27 5.3.1 Social services...... 27 5.3.2 Economic services ...... 27 5.3.3 Housing...... 28 5.3.4 Transport Services ...... 28 5.4 Socio Economic Implication ...... 28 6. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...... 29 6.1 Overall Assessment ...... 29 6.2 Positive Impacts of the Proposed Road Project...... 30 6.2.1 Job Opportunity during construction period ...... 30 6.2.2 Provision of easy access mobility...... 30 6.2.3 Gender Impacts...... 30 6.2.4 Contribution to Economic Growth...... I 6.2.5 Improvement of Drainage ...... 31 6.2.6 Summary of identified potential impacts...... 32 6.3 Adverse impacts of the proposed Road Project ...... 32 6.3.1 Impacts on Physical Environment ...... 33 6.3.1.1 Land Loses...... 33 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

Impacts on Water Resources ...... 34 Air and Noise Pollution ...... 34 Impacts on socio-economic environment ...... 36 Damages of Infrastructure ...... 36 Private plantation, and Trees ...... 38 Loss of Eucalyptus and Other Economically Valuable Trees ...... 39 Health issues ...... 47 Community disturbances ...... 47 Potential impacts of campsites ...... 49 Impact from immigrant workers ...... 49 Impacts on Vulnerable Households ...... 49 Summary of Total Affected Assets ...... 50 7. COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK ...... 52 7.1 General Approach ...... 52 7.2 Principles of Compensation ...... 52 7.3 Eligible Parties...... 53 7.4 Compensation Eligibility...... 53 7.4.1 Non-Eligible Affected persons and Cut-off date ...... 53

7.5 Valuation Method for Affected Assets ...... 56 7.5.1 Valuation/Compensation for Permanently Loss of Cultivated Land ...... 56 7.5.2 Valuation/Compensation for Temporary Dispossession of Rural Land 57 7.5.3 Valuation/Compensation for Grazing Land ...... 58 7.5.4 Valuation/Compensation for Trees ...... 58 7.5.5 Valuation/Compensation for Residential Land, Houses. and Fixtures . 59 7.5.6 Compensation for Public utilities ...... 59 7.5.7 Income restoration ...... 60 7.5.8 Replacement Cost ...... 60 8. DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES ...... 62 9. DESCRIPTION OF PROVISIONS FOR REDRESS AND GRIEVANCES ...... 64 9.1 Grievance Redress ...... 64 9.2 Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... 64 10. COMPENSATION IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE...... 65 10.1 Ccompensation delivery mechanisms ...... 65 11. FRAMEWORK FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...... 67 11.1 Internal Monitoring ...... 67 11.2 Internal monitoring indicators...... 67 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

11.3 External Monitoring and Evaluation ...... 67 11.3.1 Outcome Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation...... 68

12. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 69 12.1 Conclusion...... 69 12.2 Recommendations ...... 69 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Appendixes

ANNEX 1. List of Contacted Persons ANNEX 2. List of Community Participated on Consultation ANNEX 3. House and Fence categories ANNEX 4. House and Fence Categories and Unit Cost ANNEX 5 Survey Questionnaires ANNEX 6 Minutes of Meetings on Different Project area ANNEX 7 Vulnerable Groups ANNEX 8: A Inventories of Affected Assets, Project Affected Persons Who loss Land and Trees and Compensation Cost ANNEX 8: B List of Affected persons, Institutions who Loss Houses and Fences and Compensation Cost

ANNEX 9 Response to Comments Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

ABBREVIATIONS

AAOV Annual Average Output Value ADLl Agriculture Development Lead Industrialization CBO Community Based Organization CSA Central Statistical Authority CSE Conservation Strategy of Ethiopia EEPCO Ethiopian Electric and Power Corporation EMSB Environmental Monitoring and Safety Branch EMP Environmental Management Plan ESlA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia FGD Focus Group Discussion FHH Female Headed Households GRC Grievance Redress Committee GCRC Gross Current Replacement Cost HIVIAIDS Human Immune Virus IAcquired Immune Deficiency yndrome Ha Hectare HHs Households lAPs Interested and affected parties IMU Independent Monitoring Unit KEBELE: Smallest Administrative Unit (Ethiopia) MoFED Ministry of Finance and Economic Development NGO Non Governmental Organization PAPS Project Affected Persons OP Operational Policy of the World Bank RAP Resettlement Action Plan RP Resettlement Program me RPF Resettlement Policy Framework ROW Right of Way SElA Social and Environmental Impact Assessment TOR Terms of Reference WOREDA District Level Government Administrative Division

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

LIST OF TABLES:

Table: 5.1 Demographic characteristics of the project area 25 Table : 5.2 Land use of the Wereda 26 Table: 5.3 Social services coverage 27 Table 6.1: Summary of Identified Potential Impacts of the Proposed 3 2 Table : 6.2 Summary of Land Use along the road 3 3 Table : 6.3 Summary of House affected along the road 36 Table : 6.4 Summary of Residential Fences affected along the road 3 7 Table 6.5: Summary of impacts associated with utility services and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase) 3 7 Table: 6.6 Summary of potential impacts associated with infrastructure services and suggested mitigation measures ( Construction phase 3 8 Table : 6.7 PAPS Summary for different Agricultural Assets 3 8 Table: 6.8 Number of affected eucalyptus and their cost Birr 3 9 Table : 6.9 Summary of Gesho (Hope tree) trees affected along the road 40 Table : 6.10 Summary of Coffee trees affected along the road 40 Table : 6.1 1 Summary of Fruit trees affected along the road 4 1 Table : 6.12 Summary of Enset (False Banana) Trees affected along the road 42 Table : 6.1 3 Summary of Chat trees affected along the road 42 Table : 6.14 Summary of Indigenous trees affected along the road 43 Table : 6.15 Summary of farm lands affected along the road 43 Table: 6.16 Summary of potential impacts associated with loss of farmlands, pasture and trees and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase) 44 Table: 6.17 Details of families losing grazing land 44 Table: 6.18. Summary of cemeteries 46 Table : 6.19 Summary of potential health issues and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase) 47 Table: 6.20 Summary of potential community disturbances and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase) 48 Table: 6.21 Vulnerable Groups 50 Table: 6.22 Summary of Total Affected Assets 50 Table 7.1 : ENTITLEMENT MATRIX OF COMPENSATION 5 5 Table 7.2 : Replacement Costs for Agricultural Land and Structures 6 1 Table 10.1 COMPENSATION AND LAND ACQUSATION PLAN 66

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

LIST OF FIGURE:

Figure 1 Schematic Presentation of Resettlement Committee

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

-

BACKGROUND Welkite - Hossaina Road project is an upgrading project having a length of 121Km. It is located in the Southern Nations Nationalities Peoples Regional State. Welkite-Hossaina road project starts at Welkite where the existing road branches off from the main Addis - Jimma Highway. The road with a distance of 121 km passes through several towns and villages of Gubre, Emdibir, Arekit, Kebul, Lera and ends up at the entrance of Hossaina Town. Besides providing access between Wolkite and Hossaina, the road also forms part of the long distance links to Addis Ababa and Jimma. It is seen as one of Regional important road links. Though the recent maintenance has improved the road quality on certain sections, the traffic volume is increasing, causing constraints for agricultural products movement and reducing the level of service offered by the road. The construction of the road will also create improved access to investment and social services and contribute for the socio-economic development of the area. However, road construction does not always have high socio-economic benefits without causing adverse effects on socio-environment. Serious disruption of the bio-physical resources, social structures and infrastructures can be resulted if a road project's designed and constructed without considering socio-environmental issues. Hence, the primary purpose of this feasibility level RAP study is to ensure that the possible impacts of the road project are adequately and appropriately considered and mitigation measures for adverse significant socio-environmental impacts will be incorporated when decisions are taken. SCOPE OF THE RAP The scope of this RAP study is limited to assess potential, positive as well as adverse impacts of the project road within the direct and indirect influence areas and to propose mitigation measures for adverse impacts. The project direct influence areas include road right of way, quarry sites, and borrow areas, construction campsites, nearby water sources, waste disposal sites and communities residing within 30 meters of ROW.

The study in towns consider 20 meters ROW to minimize the social impacts specially damages of infrastructures, since it is found that most of the towns along the roads are reside within 30 meters of ROW.

OBJECTIVES OF RAP

The objectives of RAP study are to describe the existing socio-environmental features of the road project, assess potential positive and negative effects and recommend appropriate solutions to avoid or minimize any undesirable effects resulting from the construction and operation of the project road.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Reporf

METHODOLOGY

Documents on relevant policies, guidelines and legislations were reviewed primarily to describe the relevant policies and legislative framework within which the socio-environmental assessment is undertaken. Then, relevant data and information were collected from regional, zonal and wereda level Government Organizations that are involved in public administration and development activities in the project area. The whole length of the project road and its corridor was also investigated using structured questionnaire with the help of enumerators asking all households residing within 30 metres ROW in rural area while 20 metres ROW in towns. Thus data on assets to be affected were collected. Natural and social environment is investigated through observations and interviews of local informants.

Formal structured interviews as well as informal discussions with the local people, project affected individuals and officials were held in different wereda and kebele level along the roads to obtain their ideas about the proposed project. Finally, the data collected were reviewed, analyzed and utilized to describe the existing situation of the road environment in terms of its physical and biological features and socio-economic conditions.

PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS

The study team has consulted the project area wereda administration (Welkite, Chaha, Gummer, Mirab Azernet Berebere and Limo) and project affected persons to grasp their views on the project road. The consulted people and the Wereda officials noted that the construction of the project road is one of the key development issues of the area. All of them believed that the realization of the proposed road construction will improve the socio- economic development of the areas. They stressed that the realization of the project road will create easy access to the federal city and other regional towns through regular access of public transport and truck transport. During the consultation, the local Administration officials promised:

; To provide as much as possible replacement land for the relocation of affected persons if any;

z To keep the ROW and prevent people not to build any houses in the designated ROW width; To deliver all necessary support to the project affected persons during the relocation and compensation processes.

REVIEWS OF STRATEGIES, POLICIES AND LEGISLATIONS

Relevant policies legislations and guidelines were reviewed and incorporated in the report. More attention was given for the SElA guidelines of EPA and ERA. Also, International laws related to THE BANK were discussed. This RAP was prepared in accordance to these guidelines and policies.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

PROJECT LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTION

The Wolikite-Hossaina road project is located in Southern Nations Nationalities Peoples Regional State. It traverses five weredas of Wolkite, Chaha, Gummer, Mirab Azernet Berbere and Limo. It is proposed to connect these weredas to Addis Ababa-Jimma Trunk roads. The total length of the road is 121km.

Topography The proposed road passes through different types of terrain including plain, rolling and mountainous sections. Most of the weredas where the road traverses are located on plain and rolling topography.

Climate The climatic condition of the project area combines semi-cold and partly warm climatic features. The mean temperature varies between 15 to 25Oc.The mean annual rainfall of the project area is between 800-1200 mm.

Water Resources The project area has water shortage, particularly during the dry season. At present, there is no enough water supplies for most of the towns in the project area. Though the road passes across several streams, all of them were dry at the time of field assessment in the month of April. The available potable water sources along the road are Wolkite, Endibir and Hossaina towns

Flora and Fauna The vegetation cover along the proposed project road is dominated by bushes and shrubs with eucalyptus and bushy grassland. There is no high forest or priority forest area along the road. However, there are some endangered tree species, which are remnants of the former high forest of the area. These endangered tree species, namely Acacia abyssinica, Olea europea var. africana, are found on the end section of the road in Limo wereda. Different species of birds were observed along the proposed road.

Land Use The land use and land cover of the project area is basically defined as intensively farming area, while smaller portion covered with bushes and shrubs. Major crops grown at the highland portion are wheat, barley, maize, bean and lentil. Lowland portion is known for the production of sorghum, maize, haricot bean and Teff. Coffee and Chat are also grown in the lowland portion. The land use type of the road Right Of Way (ROW) was also assessed during the field survey. The survey result shows that about 80 % of the ROW is farm and grazing land while about 20% is bush and shrub.

POPULATION AND SETTLEMENT PATTERN At present the project area (Welkite wereda, Chaha wereda, Gummer wereda, Mirab Azernet Berebere wereda and Limo weredea) has a population of about 832,521; of which 11% are urban and 89% are rural and the average household size is about 5.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

The population growth rate of the region is 2.9 % per annum with an average population density of 127 per sq.km; however, in the zones traversed by the project road the population density is higher: 265 per sq.km in Gurage zone, 313 in Silti zone and 346 in Hadiya zone. These densities are higher than the regional average. (Regional Statistical Abstract, June, 2006)

Ethnicity, Religion and Language The major ethnic residents are Gurage, Silte and Hadiya with few other ethnic communities. The major religious affiliations are Orthodox Christianity and Islam. The major languages spoken in the project area are Guragina, Silti and Hadiya.

MAIN ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES The major economic activity in the study area is agriculture particularly for the rural population where subsistence farming is the dominant means of earning a living. The major economic activity for urban residents is trading.

The existing farming system is traditional mixed farming based on animal traction and human labor that also includes animal rearing for milking, draught power and transportation.

Livestock production is equally important as crop production in all parts of the project affected woredas. Cattle have a multipurpose benefit. It provides power for farming, meat, milk, hides, manure, and service as an asset and source of income in drought and famine periods.

Generally it is understood from the field survey that average income is based on the farm land size a farmer possesses.

Social Services:

The project area has different social services including health services, drinking water and schools up to senior high schools. It has water supply, Health and Education coverage of 21%, 57% and 56% respectively.

PROJECT IMPACTS Positive

Both beneficiary and adverse socio-environmental impacts are anticipated from the upgrading road project. The major beneficiary impacts are reduction of existing dust problem and associated health impacts, reduction of travel time and transportation cost, increase of access to transportation and opportunity of job creation for the skilled and unskilled local people along the road route and contribution for the overall economic growth of the country.

Adverse Impacts

The Road mainly involves upgrading of the existing gravel road from Welkite to Hossaina which is 121 km, its overall impact on physical environment is not severe. However, due to the development of towns and settlements close to the existing road, its impact on social environment will not be as simple as it was thought. Several houses are already constructed Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Reporl

with in 30 m of road right of way at different stretches of the road. Residential houses will be affected.

Other impacts include loss of farm and grazing land, destruction of natural vegetation situated within the 30 m ROW and, lose of road side eucalyptus plantation in most of the road adjacent, lose of commercial crops of Chat and Ensets (False Banana), and fruit trees also occur.

Health issues are identified and expected to occur with the commencement of the construction. Major health issues are associated with HIVIAIDSlSTDs, labor migration and camping sites. Moreover, due to the conducive environment occurring in the construction phase multiplication of malaria vector are expected to increase. Also, dust born and accidental health impacts during the construction phase are expected.

Water resource pollution from increased siltation and campsite sanitation could occur unless the proposed mitigation measures are strictly followed. It is anticipated that water supply lines, poles and other infrastructures will be affected in different towns and villages during the construction period because of their location within the right of way. Prior to the commencement of construction, all public services that will be affected should be relocated to minimize disruptions to the services. In this regard the consultant makes the EEPCO aware of the possible impact on electric concrete poles within the ROW.

There are cemeteries affected in the ROW at 12 places in one wereda called Mirab Azernet kebele of three different kebeles. The cemeteries are located within 10 km stretches. The community representatives have been consulted and confirm to relocate the cemeteries in the places if the spaces are very narrow to make any possible mitigation measures with the ROW. The suggested mitigation measures are found under section

To overcome or minimize the identified adverse impacts and other possible negative impacts, appropriate mitigation measures are proposed.

MAIN FINDINGS:

The road being the upgrading of the existing gravel road from Welkite to Hossiana which is 121km, its overall impact on physical environment is not severe. However, due to the development of towns and settlements close to the existing road, its impact on social environment will not be as simple as it was thought. Several houses are already constructed within 30 m of road right of way at different stretches of the road.

Other impacts include loss of strips farm and grazing land, destruction of natural vegetation situated within the 30 m ROW and, lose of road side eucalyptus plantation in most of the road adjacent, lose of commercial crops of Chat and Ensets (False Banana), and fruit trees.

Briefly the following indicates main findings and impacts of the road construction. P Road Length: 121km

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

9 Status of the road: DS4 and DS3

9 Road Functional Classification: (link)

9 Proposed Surface type: Asphalt concrete

1 Description I Impacts in Quantity I Number of households who lose house fully 473 Number of households who lose house partially 299 1 Private fences affected in meters 1 35,116 Number of institutional buildings affected fully No Number of institutional buildings affected partially 5 Number of institutional fences in meters 1,293 1 Loss of agricultural lands permanently in hectares* 1 28.68 1 Loss of agricultural lands temporarily in hectares No I Number of households who lose strips of lands in ROW 2,796 I Loss of tress in Number 1 175,055 1 Loss of fruit trees 4,147 Loss of telephone line affected in meters lump sum is included Water pipe affected (diameter and total length) 3/4 inch - 488 I p5imF I At 12 locations Fully affected households 3,269 Partially affected households 299 Elnumber of project affected persons 17,840 'It is not possible to know the amount of land to be compensated in kind at this stage. That will be known when the local administration informs the amount of land made available to compensate in kind.

Entitlement Matrix

The following elements constitute the key components of the entitlement matrix presented in table 7.1. A. Land permanently acquired for the project Owners with formal legal titles Owners/occupiers, who are eligible for formal legal title under Ethiopian law PAPS with other recognized land use right Occupiers who are not eligible for legal titles B. Permanent loss of house, other structure and improvement, and land based assets such as trees Owners of houses and other structures (whether with land title or not) C. Temporary effects such as disturbance to crops during construction FarmerILand userslowners of infrastructure within the ROW D. For effects on Business Owners of Business Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Employees who have lost income as a result of the project

Cut-off date

The cut-off date for compensation was June 1712009. Cultivating land, constructing buildings or settlements in project affected areas after the cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation or subsidies. Compensation will also not be paid for any structures erected, or crops and trees planted purely for the purposes of gaining additional compensation.

As far as the proposed mitigation measures are implemented properly, the overall project impact would be acceptable and positive impacts would overcome the adverse negative impacts.

RAP BUDGET The overall socio-environmental impact mitigations and compensation cost is estimated to be 29,342,521 birr. Detailed unit costs are found in Annex8.A and Annex8.B.

Table: 6.22 Summary of Total Affected Assets

I I I Compensation I

meters 36,409 822,305 of farm lands Hectares 28.68 2,581,200 (False Banana )plant number 57,139 1,599,892 Permanent loss of Coffee trees number 1,728 23,406 Permanent lose of Hope trees number 712 142,400 Permanent loss of Eucalyptus trees number 1,371,677 1,110,932 I Permanent loss of indigenous trees number 18,704 935,200 Permanent loss of Fruit and other trees number 4,147 289,750 Permanent loss of Trees (chat) number 2,982 782,775 I Relocation cost for Tele poles Lump sum 91 7,150 Relocation cost for Electric poles* Meters Water Supply pipes Meters 488 107,360 Training Lump sum 300,000 HIVIAIDS Prevention Lump sum 500,000 1 Assistance to Vulnerable groups 500,000 I I I 1 Cemeteries Lum sum 1 232,600 Sub-total 26,675,019 Contingency (10%) 2,667,502 Grand Total 29,342,521

*( Under construction of changing the wood pole with concretes poles at the time field survey)

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

DISCLOSURE:

The following process will be followed by ERA to disclose the RAP: ERA will advertise the availability of the RAP at designated places to the public in the electronic media (including ERA'SWeb site) and government news papers,

The Federal government of Ethiopia will sent a letter to the World Bank to disclose RAP at info shop.

E.R.A will send copies of the final RAP to immediate stake holders including respective Regional government, zone and Wereda offices.

ERA will place the RAP at designated places and at least through the construction phases. These designated places may include government and non-government institutions along the project road.

Public disclosure of the RAP will be carried, thorough distribution of summaries describing the most important section of the RAP. Public disclosure of the draft RAP must be made to the affected persons in a form and language that they can understand. This may be in the form of a brochure or leaflet, to be provided to affected persons, in an accessible place.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this social impact analysis, the construction and operation of the Wolkite - Hossaina Road will have several beneficial as well as adverse impacts on social and natural environment within the area of influence of the road.

The construction of the proposed road will not cause significant socio-environmental effects that cannot be minimized with normal good engineering practices and with integrating the proposed environmental and social mitigation measures in the planning and execution of the project.

Most of the social impacts are moderate and will be reversible with community consultation and involvement and designing considering the needs of the community as appropriate and possible. Impacts like loss of fertile farmland, housing, plantation will be permanent impacts. Temporary impacts stem from ground disturbance for the road construction and for obtaining construction materials, as well as operation of construction equipment and camps or housing of the labor force. These temporal impacts can be reduced to acceptable levels with good engineering practices and integration of restoration and other mitigation measures in the planning and implementation of the project.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

RECOMMENDATIONS

a) Environmental Aspects To have minimal and acceptable residual environmental impacts, it is recommended that the proposed mitigation measures be properly implemented by including them in the Tender Document for the contractor and through an Environmental Management Plan. A close follow up of the effectiveness of the implemented measures through a well-planned monitoring program is also critically important.

b) Socio-Economic Aspects The positive impact of the project will be felt at both the construction and operation stages. During construction, the benefits will be mainly related to business activities and employment opportunity. By this it is considered that persons who reside in towns and villages along the road will profit from business activities created by the contractor. Employment opportunities will probably be restricted to the hiring of unskilled laborers who will be actively involved in the construction processes and thereby gain income and knowledge.

Investment activities as well as export and import will be improved as a result of improved access. On the other hand, with regard to adverse consequences of the project, the most important impact on socio-economic life is the loss of property; in particular the loss of farmland, housing units and business centers. However, these will be mitigated by the payment of suitable compensation.

Based on the socio-cultural assessment, the following recommendation should be implemented to ensure the sustainability of the road project:

Project area communities should be actively encouraged to participate in the construction and implementation of the project. This participation should start from provision of necessary data and information pertaining to the project activities. Such participation should take account of the contributions that can be made by women at every level.

Project area communities and stakeholders should be consulted from time to time, particularly before and during the construction period, to find appropriate mitigation measures or adverse impacts, and to solve them accordingly.

Before the start of construction, detailed inventory of affected property and/or households should be compiled.

'The involvement of stakeholders is essential. The local administration, namely Woreda administration and Kebele administration will be very helpful in facilitating the project activities through solving problems related to land acquisition, settlement of disputes and security.

The schedule of construction needs should be communicated to the concerned bodies at the earliest possible opportunity, to allow affected households time to prepare themselves physically and mentally to participate and co-operate with the project activities.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers PLC in Jv with Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

Welkite - Hossaina Road upgrading project is a project intended to improve the road network of the community along the road. It is found from the discussion made with the local officials and community (Annex 1 and 2) that it incorporates the felt need of the community existing on different towns along the road, of their social, commercial and public transportation interest which otherwise hinder the development effort of the towns and rural community.

The project land requirement during construction is, 30 meters width of both right and left sides. The right of Way width is 30 meters in rural areas and 20 meters in towns to reduce the impacts in towns. The land acquisition and resettlement impacts of the projects are not involve resettlement plan mainly for the following two reasons:

The project is upgrading the existing lines involving affection of land acquisition for the working space and to widen the narrow road spaces in the towns. There is no significant total demolishing of the homestead to be affected during construction, except affecting partly in most cases l/th of the total floor area of the houses

Although the land acquisition and resettlement impacts of the projects are minor, scarcity of land in the high land parts of the project impose a limitation on the project.

However the policies measures and procedures as described in the World Bank policy will be applied to all impacts.

The key effects of the project are: Agricultural Land acquisitions; Grazing Land acquisitions; Affected houses and fences due to damage during construction work space.

The projects are not likely to require a full resettlement plan as no displaced people except relocation within their current residence location. However, adequate compensation and income restitution measures will thus be essential. Above all, with the expected development of the local economy in the project and the increase in traffic volumes there will be a continuing need to improve the road. In view of the relatively high traffic volumes upgrading of the road is important.

1.2 Objective of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) It is intended to assess: the social impacts the road project has on the human environment and utilities the magnitude of the impacts to look for the possible mitigation measures for adverse social impacts

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 1 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

1.3 Methodology

The methodology applied for acquiring data and information necessary for the socio- economic impact analysis of the project includes the following:

a) Field Visit

A field assessment was carried out and an overall social feature along the project route is investigated. The whole length of the project road corridor was assessed through observations and interviews of local informants. The field visit was done twice once during the inception phase and the second in the feasibility phase for the detail survey of the impacts and to inventories all the assets to be affected and for consultation with relevant stakeholders of the project.

b) Data collection

Secondary Sources: Previous study reports of the road, EIA and socio-economic studies of the road, and other relevant documents were reviewed.

Reviews of information useful for the socio-environmental assessments, pertinent policies and guidelines have been reviewed to get relevant data and policy issues.

Primary sources: To obiain first hand information about the socio-economic situation of the study area, impacts both human and physical, and attitude of the community a field visit was carried out and necessary observations and data collection has been made using survey questionnaire (attached) with help of local survey assistants over the entire road length. c) Public consultation

Local administration of both at wereda and kebele level, key persons and some of the stakeholders were consulted. The main objective of the consultation was to create awareness about the proposed road project among the community and stakeholders, to obtain background information relevant to socio-economic impact assessment and to understand the attitude of the local community towards the proposed project. The public consultation was carried out in different areas at different times mostly with groups and to some extent with key persons.

Public consultation is one of the significant tools for the success of development projects like road projects. At this level the reasons for public consultation include: To disseminate information among the community and stakeholders. To recognize the attitude of the community towards the project. To understand the local community's practical experience in similar or other projects. To anticipate possible solutions for the problems related to the project.

With this reasoning consultation was made with community representatives, local administrative bodies and key persons.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pic in JV Core Consulting Engineers 2 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

The most important issues, for which the discussions focus were the damages to be caused and issues of:

Receiving fair compensation Minimizing land acquisition Ensuring adequate land allocation and livelihood restoration

> Community Representatives Consultation

Consultation with community representatives was carried out through group discussion in different areas during the field visit. On the group discussion representatives were briefed about the need for consultation, about the proposed project and the different alternatives. (See photo below and Annex1 .)

Photo 1: Discussion with elders and community representative at Lera Town (Mirab Azernet Wereda)

Photo. 2 : Consultation with community at Chaha Wereda. Wedero Kebele

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pic in JV Core Consulting Engineers 3 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

9 Consultation with Local Administration

At Woreda and Kebele level administrators or their representatives were consulted and informed about the proposed project.

Finally, the data and documentation collected were reviewed and analyzed, primarily to: Describe the relevant policies and legislative framework within which the socio-environmental assessment is undertaken.

Describe the existing setting of the road environment in terms of its physical and biological conditions. In the description of the baseline condition, more attention was given for the road corridors of the proposed alternatives. Identify, analyze and evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed alternative

D. Analysis

The data and documents collected were reviewed, analyzed and utilized in this document to indicate general existing Socio- economic condition, positive and negative impacts of the road project and feasible mitigation measures were proposed.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 4 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Reporf

2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ROAD PROJECT

The existing road is a gravel road with a total length of 121 km. The road links the agricultural productive hinterlands of the region, SNNP. The existing road width is 15 -20 meters including both walkway and parking. The road width is not sufficient to accommodate the existing traffic of both vehicle and human. The road is muddy in rainy season and dusty in dry season. There is no properly paved and constructed walk way. Both vehicle and people use the same road. There is no drainage system and the drainage flows on most of the road. The opinion received from the different woreda administrators and their representative, gives due consideration. As per their opinion, the envisaged road project will affect houses in the town and both houses and farm lands in the rural. However it is suggested that there is a compensation draft law which should be considered by them regarding involuntary displacement and damage due to the development activity. It is their opinion that any displacement will be handled as per the proposed law. Apart from this there is an experience of involving the project affected persons for consultation in the time of compensation by their own representatives. In all the woredas they confirm that, whenever the damage on houses in towns occurs there is land within the towns under the control of urban administration council which is planned to distribute for new house construction applicant, which could be shared to these incoming project affected people. Regarding the rural people project affected persons any displaced could get the land for construction of houses from the common grazing area which is under the rural kebele administration. The different stakeholders including the affected people consulted recommended that the road upgrading project thought it affects residential houses and farm land they have the opinion of high benefit they derived due to the construction of the road expecting fair compensation for their damaged assets. The list of Consulted Organizations and Persons is given in Appendix 2.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 5 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

3. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

3.1 POLICIES

3.1.1 Economic policy Ethiopia embarked on a series of economic reforms in the early 19901s,introducing more liberal economic policies. Amongst the core economic policies adopted were increased privatization instead of the public ownership of economic establishments, the phased liberalization of exchange rates deregulation of prices and foreign trade. This has resulted in increased economic growth and stability in the economy, despite the recurrent drought impacting on agriculture performance, the main stream of the economy.

The country's economic policy, was refined in 2002, with formulation of a poverty reduction focused strategy, to incorporate all development programs, including agriculture, education, health, and the road sector development Program. This strategy is focused toward the reduction of poverty in the short term, with the goal of achieving sustained socio-economic development in long term. Central to the national economic policy is the agriculture Development Led Industrialization (ADLI), with the focal strategy of improved productivity in agriculture with the objective of increasing output. The stated objective is that improved performance in agriculture, through a variety of program and strategies, creates growth and development in other industries.

The Sustainable Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (SDPRS), was developed by the government in consultation with major donors and is being implemented, with the backing of development partner. As a result of this, Ethiopia received some debt forgiveness under the highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) conditional ties.

3.1.2 The National Population Policy The national population policy, which was issued in 1993, aims to reduce population growth by reducing the number of children per women from 7.5 to 4.0 by 201 5. The policy also recognizes that if economic and social development is to be sustainable it must be compatible with the limits of the existing natural resource base.

3.1.3 Environmental Policies The Environmental Policy of Ethiopia (EPE) was issued in April 1997. The overall policy goal is to improve and enhance the health and quality of life of all Ethiopians. It focuses to promote sustainable social and economic development through sound management and use of natural, human and cultural resources and their environment as a whole to meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

The policy seeks to ensure the empowerment and participation of the people and their organizations at all levels in environmental management activities, and to raise public awareness and promote understanding of the essential linkage between environment and development. In addition to its guiding principles, the policy provides sectoral and cross- sectoral environmental policies.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 6 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Socio-Environmental Impact Assessment (SEIA) policies are included in the cross- sectoral environmental policies. The SEIA policies emphasize the early recognition of socio-environmental issues in project planning, public participation, mitigation and socio- environmental management, and capacity building at all levels of administration.

The policy establishes the authority of the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to harmonize Sectoral Development Plans and to implement an environmental management program for the country. It also imparts political and popular support to the sustainable use of natural, human-made and cultural resources at the federal, regional, zonal, wereda and community levels.

3.1.4 National Policy on Women The Federal Democratic Government of Ethiopia has declared its unequivocal commitment to the development of women with the announcement of the National Policy on Women in 1993. The Women's Policy primarily aims to institutionalize the political, economical, and social rights of women by creating an appropriate structure in government offices and institutions so that the public policies and interventions are gender-sensitive and can ensure equitable development for all Ethiopian men and women.

The Policy states that the responsibility of ensuring the implementation of the National Policy on Women lies mainly with the Government. Besides, various women's organizations are formed to promote women issues in different areas.

All development program at National and Regional levels should be able to integrate gender concerns in their plans and program to see that women participate, contribute benefit and their effort is recognized and technologically supported. Thus the mainstreaming of gender in all development programs should focus at establishing a system where by each sector program would use gender as a measuring indicator to quantify project and achievements.

3.1.5 Health Policy of Ethiopia The health policy of Ethiopia was issued in Sept. 1993. It was prepared through critical examination of the nature, magnitude, and root causes of the prevailing health problem of the country and awareness of newly emerging health problems. It accords appropriate emphasis to the needs of the less privileged rural population, which constitute the overwhelming majority of the nation. In general, the policy states that health development shall be seen not only in humanitarian terms but also as an essential component of the package of social and economic development as well as being an instrument of social justice and equity.

3.1.6 HIVIAIDS Prevention and Control in the Work Places of ERA ERA has prepared a sectoral policy for HIVIAIDS in the workplaces of ERA (June,2004). In the Policy, ERA acknowledges the fact that the HIV/AIDS pandemic is a reality in the work place and may have detrimental effects on the goals and objectives of the Authority. Therefore, the authority:

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 7 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Commits itself to create a supportive and non discriminatory working environment through dispelling of myths and stereotypes and by ensuring that infected employees are treated in the same manner as other employees, Seeks to minimize the social, economic and developmental consequences to the authority and its staff, Undertakes that management will provide resources and leadership to implement program for the prevention and control of the HIVIAIDS and sexually transmitted infections (STI), Commits itself to offering support, counseling and education services to infected & affected employees; . Commits itself to establish and maintain an employee assistance program, and Insures sustainable resources for the prevention and control of HIVIAIDS.

The ERA task force is responsible and accountable for all programs for prevention and control of HIVI AIDS in the authority. The ERA'S environmental monitoring and safety branch through the HIVIAIDS program coordinators is responsible for coordinating, implementing, monitoring and evaluating the policy provisions.

3.1.7 Water Resource Management Policy of Ethiopia Ministry of water Resources has prepared water resources management policy of Ethiopia. The overall goal of the policy is to enable and promote all national efforts towards the efficient, equitable and optimum utilization of the available water resources of Ethiopia for significant socioeconomic development on sustainable basis. The policy ensures that water allocation gives the highest priority to water supply and sanitation while apportioning the rest for uses and services that result the highest socio economic benefits.

3.1.8 Biodiversity Policy The biodiversity policy, which was approved in 1998, provides guidance towards the effective conservation, rational development and sustainable utilization of the country's biodiversity. In general, the policy consists of comprehensive policy provisions on the conservation and sustainable utilization of biodiversity.

3.1.9 Wildlife policy The Ministry of agriculture and rural Development has developed the Wildlife policy in 2006. The specific objectives of the policy include properly developing and administering the country's wildlife resources and enabling the sector to contribute fully to the economic development and the wellbeing of the ecosystem. The policy also includes articles on how to protect the wildlife resources and their habitat so that stability of the ecosystem is maintained for posterity, in accordance with international wildlife conventions and agreements to which the country is a signatory.

The most important articles covered in the policy and strategy are to gazette the national parks, development of participatory wildlife management; to give special attention to the

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 8 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

protection and conservation of the endemic and threatened wildlife and promoting wildlife health. Besides, due attention has been given for the control of the illegal movement of wildlife and products and are the most important points that has been dealt with in the policy and strategy.

3.1.10 Education Policy The Government's desire to improve the provision of quality education resulted in the formulation of the Education and Training Policy (ETP), In 1997 the Government of Ethiopia launched the first five year Education Sector Development Program (ESDP-I) within the framework of ETP as part of a twenty-year plan for the education sector. The main thrust of ESDP is to improve quality and efficiency and to expand access with special emphasis on primary education in rural and underserved areas, as well as the promotion of education for girls in an attempt to achieve universal primary education by 201 5.

3.1.1 1 Road Sector Development program he Government of Ethiopia formulated a Road Sector Development Program (RSDP), which aimed at contributing to the country's economic development. (World Bank: December 1997). The core focal areas of the program include the following:- = Improving trunk and link regional rural road access and utilization to meet agricultural and other economic development needs; Building up the institutional capacity in both the public and private sectors for sustainable road development and maintenance; and Providing economic opportunity for the rural poor through increased employment in rural road works and development of appropriate and affordable means of transport and services. The Road Sector Development Program (RSDP) was formulated as a 10-year program (1997-2007). The first five year of the program (RSDPI), covering the period 1997 to 2007, was officially launched in September 1997, and was completed in June 2002, with recorded physical and financial performance of 88 percent and 77 percent respectively. (ERA: November 2006). According to the Road sector Development Performance Report, the first phase of the Road Sector Development Program (1997 to 2002) focused on the restoration of the road network to acceptable condition. The second phase (2002-2007) aimed at consolidating the achievements of the first phase, while also promoting the expansion, enhancing the connectivity of the network, and hence providing a sustainable road system to rural parts of the country. Up to end of June 2006, a total of 51,437 Kms. of rural roads were constructed upgradedlrehabilitated and maintained, of which 8495 krns were federal roads and 9531 kms newly constructed/maintained, regional roads, and over 33400 kms were community and newly constructed and maintained.

3.1.12 Regional Policy The regional policies of the SNNP are based on the national policy framework considering the regional peculiarities of resources and constraints. The regional policies are not different from the national and emanate from the national framework and targets but take into account the specific regional conditions, potentials and capabilities.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 9 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Reporf

3.1.1 3 The World Bank Resettlement policy

Operational Directive (OP) 4.1 2 This directive describes

Bank policy and procedures on involuntary resettlement, as well as the conditions that borrowers are expected to meet in operation involving involuntary resettlement Planning and financing resettlement components or free-standing projects are an integral part of preparation for projects that cause involuntary displacement. Any operation that involves land acquisition or is a category A or B project resettlement requirements early in the project cycle (para,20)

Development projects that displaced people involuntarily generally give rise to serve economic, social, and environmental problems: production systems are dismantled; productive assets and income sources are lost; people are relocated to environments where their productive skills may be less applicable and the competition for recourses greater; community structures and social networks are weakened; kin groups are dispersed; and cultural identity, traditional authority ,and the potential for mutual help are diminished. Involuntary resettlement may cause severe long-term hardship, impoverishment, and environmental damage unless appropriate measures are carefully planned and carried out.

The World Bank's requirements regarding involuntary resettlement are detailed in Operational Directive 4.12. The directive outlines the following principles:

Acquisition of land and other assets, and resettlement of people will be minimized as much as possible by identifying possible alternative project designs, and appropriate social, economic, operational and engineering solutions that have the least impact on populations in the Project area.

The populations affected by the Project are defined as those who may stand to lose, as a consequence of the Project, all or part of their physical and non-physical assets, including homes, homesteads, productive lands, commercial properties, tenancy, income-earning opportunities, social and cultural activities and relationships, and other losses that may be identified during the process of resettlement planning.

All PAPS who will be identified in the project impacted areas as of the date of the updated census and inventory of losses, will be entitled to be compensated for their lost assets, incomes and businesses at full replacement cost and provided with rehabilitation measures sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income earning capacity and production levels.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 10 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

All affected populations will be equally eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of tenure status, social or economic standing, and any such factors that may discriminate against achieving the objectives outlined above.

The rehabilitation measures to be provided are:

> cash compensation for houses and other structures at replacement cost of materials and labour without deduction for depreciation or salvageable materials;

> full title to replacement agricultural land for land of equal productive capacity acceptable to the PAP;

> full title to replacement residential and commercial land of equal size acceptable to the AP or, at the informed decision of the PAP, cash for replacement land at replacement cost at current market value;

> cash compensation for crops and trees at current market value; and

Relocation allowances and rehabilitation assistance.

Sufficient time will be allowed for replacement structures to be built before construction begins Temporarily affected land from the construction of access routes or earth- moving activities will be restored to pre-project conditions The compensation and resettlement activities will be satisfactorily completed and rehabilitation measures in place and all encumbrances removed before the respective Governments and World Bank will approve commencement of civil works for that contract area Existing cultural and religious practices shall be respected and, to the maximum extent practical, preserved Adequate budgetary support will be fully committed and be made available to cover the costs of land acquisition and resettlement and rehabilitation within the agreed implementation period Special measures shall be incorporated in the RAP and complementary mitigation and enhancement activities to protect socially and economically vulnerable groups such as women-headed families, children and elderly people without support structures and people living in extreme poverty Grievance procedures shall be established and in place and PAPs informed of them before any resettlement activities begin. .Details of the RAP shall be distributed to the PAPs by the Client and placed in relevant stakeholder offices for the reference of PAPs as well any interested groups.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 11 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Appropriate reporting, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be identified and set in place as part of the resettlement management system and an external monitor hired before commencement of any resettlement activities.

3.1.14 Comparison between national law on land use and Bank OP 4.12

There are issues where national law and 'The Bank law differ in land entitlements definition in relation to the date when land is owned by individuals. Before the cut of date people are having land in the ROW this raises conflict on compensation, based on the national law and World Bank law.

The law relating to land administration in Ethiopia is varied; entitlements for payments of compensation are essentially based on right of ownership. The Bank's OP 4.12 is fundamentally different from this and states that affected persons are entitled to some form of compensation whether or not they have legal titles if they occupy the land by the cut of date. Therefore, as this is a Bank funded project, the principles of OP 4.12 are not negotiable. The Bank's OP 4.12 must be adhered to. As a result, all the land to be acquired by the governments for this project would be so acquired subject to the laws of Ethiopia and the Bank OP 4.12. Where there is conflict, the Bank OP 4.12 must take precedence.

3.1.15 The Ethiopian Roads Authority's Resettlement/ Rehabilitation Policy

The resettlement 1 rehabilitation policy framework was issued in February 2002 and has been implemented since then. The overall objective of the policy framework is to clarify the principles of social impact operations. The operational objective of the framework is to provide guidelines to stakeholders participating in the rehabilitationlresettlement operations in order to ensure that project- affected-persons (PAPs) will not be impoverished by the adverse social impact of the projects. The basic principles imply that PAPs should be:

Compensated for loss of assets at replacement cost. Given the opportunities to share project benefit. Be assisted in case of relocation or resettlement.

The focus should be on restoring the income earning capacity of the project-affected- persons. The aim should be to improve or at least sustain living conditions prior to project operation or resettlement. The legal framework in general deals with operational procedures, legal framework for expropriation and compensation, institutional framework, socio-economic background of PAPs, social impacts of the road rehabilitation program, valuation procedures, consultation and participation procedure, and monitoring and evaluation arrangements.

In light of the above national legal framework, The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia committed itself to abide the involuntary resettlement policy of the international

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 12 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repofl

financial institution law like The World Bank and other institutions. The national resettlement law is related to World Bank Operational Directive (OD) 4.30 on involuntary resettlement and its operational policy.

The Federal Government of Ethiopia is complying with the requirements of World Bank's operational directives (OD) 4.30 in the implementation of this and other similar road project.

3.2 LEGAL

3.2.1 The Federal Constitution

The Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, which entered into force as of August 21st 1995, forms the fundamental basis for enactment of specific legislative instruments governing environmental matters at National level. Articles 43, 44 and 92 of the Constitution specifically deal with the right to development, environmental rights and environmental objectives respectively.

In a section that deals with the right to development:

Article 43 (1) gives broad right to the peoples of Ethiopia to improved living standards and to sustainable development; Article 43 (2) acknowledges the rights of the people to be consulted with respect to policies and projects affecting their community; Article 43 (3) requires all international agreements and relations by the State to protect and ensure Ethiopia's right to sustainable development.

In a section that deals with environmental rights, Article 44 guarantees the right to a clean and healthy environment.

In a section that deals with environmental objectives Article 92 sets out the Federal policy principles and significant environmental objectives. More specifically Article 92:

affirms the commitment of the Government to endeavour to ensure that all Ethiopians live in a clean and healthy environment; warns that the design and implementation of development programs and projects do not damage or destroy the environment; guarantees the right of the people to full consultation and the expression of views in the planning and implementation of environmental policies on projects that affect them; and imposes the duty on Government and citizens to protect the environment.

In the context of land ownership and holding right:

Article 40 (3) vests the right to ownership of rural and urban land, as well as of all natural resources, in the government and in the peoples of Ethiopia; recognizes land as a common property of the Nations,

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 13 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

Nationalities of, and peoples of Ethiopia and prohibits sale or any other exchange of land; Article 40 (4) guarantees the right of farmers to obtain land without payment and the protection against eviction from their possession; and Article 40 (5) guarantees the right of pastoralists to free land for grazing and cultivation as well as the right not to be displaced from their own lands.

In recognition of the value of human input on land Article 40 (7) states that "Every Ethiopian shall have the full right to the immovable property he builds and to the permanent improvements he brings about on the land by his labor or capital. This right shall include the right to alienate, to bequeath and where the right to use expires, to remove his property, transfers his title, or claim compensation for it." In recognition of the right to acquire property for the purpose of overriding national interest Article 40 (7) empowers the Government to expropriate private property for public purposes subject to payment in advance of compensation commensurate to the value of the property. In a section that deals with economic, social and cultural rights, Article 41 (9) sets out the State responsibilities to protect and preserve historical and cultural legacies: The Research and Conservation of Cultural Heritage Proclamation No. 20912000 of Ethiopia defines cultural heritage broadly as "anything tangible or intangible which is the product of creativity and labor of man in the pre-history and history times, that describes and witnesses to the evolution of nature and which has a major value in its scientific, historical, cultural, artistic and handcraft content." Prior approval of the Authority for Research and Conservation of Cultural Heritage is required to remove from its original site of an immovable cultural heritage (Art. 2111). Whenever registered, movable cultural heritage is encountered during the execution of the project it is possible to remove such property by notifying the Authority in advance (Art. 2112). Any person who destroys or damages cultural heritage intentionally shall be punished with imprisonment not less than 10 years and not exceeding 20 years (Art. 45/21).

3.2.2 Legislation on Expropriation of Land 8 Compensation

The Federal Legislation on Expropriation of Land for Public Purposes & Compensation (Proclamation. No. 45512005), repealed the outdated provisions of the Ethiopian Civil Code of 1960 regulating land acquisition and compensation for the purpose of public projects. This new legislation established detailed procedures and setting time limits within which land could be acquired after request is received from the proponent, principles for assessment of compensation for properties on the land, and for displacement compensation. It also empowered the Woreda administration to establish valuation committees to value private properties. In the case of public-owned infrastructures to be removed from the right-of-way, the owners of the structures would assess the value of the properties to be removed. Additionally the legislation provided for appeals from valuation decisions but such action would not delay transfer of possession of land to the proponent or contractor appointed by the proponent.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 14 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

The Proclamation has removed the barriers for planned land acquisition, substantially raised the amount of compensation payable to expropriated owners of properties and displaced people. In addition to financial compensation in an amount sufficient to reinstate the displaced people to the economic position prior to displacement the relevant Regional administration is required to give another land to any person who lost his land in favor of public project. Assessments of compensation do not include the value of land itself, because land is a public property not subject to sale in Ethiopia. The responsibility of a proponent of a proposed project under Ethiopian law does not extend beyond the payment of compensation for properties and displacement. In other words the displaced people need to seek resettlement options that are stipulated with the framework of the land administration systems of the relevant rural or urban land administration. According to this proclamation, (Proclamation, No. 45512005), part two, article 3, number 1 it states that,

"A Wereda or urban administration shall, upon payment in advance payment of compensation in accordance with this proclamation, have the power to expropriate rural or urban landholdings for public purpose where it believes that it should be used for a better development project to be carried out by public entities, private investors, cooperative societies or other organs, or where such expropriation has been decided by appropriate higher regional or federal government organs for the same purpose"

A land holder whose land has been expropriated for public use by the concerned government authorities is entitled for compensation. Part two; Article 7, No.1 of the proclamation states that:

"A land holder whose holding has been expropriated shall be entitled to payment for compensation for his property situated on the land for permanent improvements he made to such land". In may lath 2007 there has been issued regulation No. 135120087 for the application of 4551205 with the purpose of paying compensation and to assist displaced persons to restore their livelihood. The regulation states the type of "Formula" to be used in valuing compensation for properties expropriated for public interest.

3.2.3 Involuntary Resettlement The Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) states that the right to ownership of rural and urban land, as well as all natural resources, is exclusively vested in the state and in the people of Ethiopia. Article 40 of the Constitution indicates that land is a common property of the nations, nationalities and the people of Ethiopia, and shall not be subjected to sale or to other means of transfer. Resettlement and rehabilitation are recognized civic rights in the Ethiopian legislation. Article 44 of the revised Constitution of 1995 states that all persons who have been displaced or whose livelihoods have been adversely affected by a State Program have the right to commensurate monetary or alternative means of compensation including relocation with adequate state assistance. This compulsory legal principle is also stated

- Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 15 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

in the Constitution of the FDRE. The government shall pay fair compensation for property found on the land but the amount of compensation shall not take into account the value of the land. Hence project plans must include an 'attractive' and sustainable resettlement strategy, offering adequate compensation and incentives to the affected population. The main emphasis should be on maintaining an open dialogue with the people, building a trustworthy relationship between the Government agencies and the population and enhancing community participation in any project from the onset of the study up to its implementation. In this respect, Article 43 (2) of the Constitution defines the rights of all Ethiopians to participate in national development and, in particular, to be consulted with respect to policies and projects affecting their community.

3.2.4 Environmental Framework Legislation

There are five Proclamations that are aimed to foster environmental protection and sustainable use of the Country's natural resources. Three of the proclamations are directly related to general environmental protection; one related to forest conservation and development, and the rest one related to rural land administration and use. These Proclamations are briefly described below.

3.2.4.1 Proclamation on Establishment of Environmental Protection The objective of this Proclamation (No. 29512002) is to assign responsibilities to separate organizations for environmental development and management activities on one hand, and environmental protection, regulations and monitoring on the other, in order to ensure sustainable use of environmental resources, thereby avoiding possible conflicts of interest and duplication of effort. It is also intended to establish a system that fosters coordinated but differentiated responsibilities among environmental protection agencies at federal and regional levels. This Proclamation re-established the EPA as an autonomous public institution of the Federal Government of Ethiopia. It also empowers every competent agency to establish or designate an environmental unit (Sectoral Environmental Unit) that shall be responsible for coordination and follow-up so that the activities of the competent agency are in harmony with this Proclamation and with other environmental protection requirements. Furthermore, the Proclamation stated that each regional state should establish an independent regional environmental agency or designates an existing agency that shall be responsible for environmental monitoring, protection and regulation in their respective regional states.

3.2.4.2 Proclamation on Environmental Impact Assessment The aim of this Proclamation (Proc. No. 29912002) is to make an EIA mandatory for specified categories of activities undertaken either by the public or private sectors and is the legal tool for environmental planning, management and monitoring. The Proclamation elaborates on considerations with respect to the assessment of positive and negative impacts and states that the impact of a project shall be assessed on the basis of the size, location, nature, cumulative effect with other concurrent impacts or phenomena, trans-regional context, duration, reversibility or irreversibility or other

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 16 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

related effects of a project. Categories of projects that will require full EIA, not full EIA or no EIA are provided. To effect the requirements of this Proclamation, the EPA has issued a Procedural and Technical EIA Guidelines, which provide details of the EIA process and its requirements. The Guidelines follow the conventional pattern adopted in many other countries and make provision for screening, scoping, identification and evaluation of impacts, the development of environmental management and monitoring plans, consideration of alternatives, EIA report structure and information requirements, etc.

3.2.4.3 Proclamation on Environmental Pollution Control This Proclamation, Proc. No. 30012002, is mainly based on the right of each citizen to have a healthy environment, as well as on the obligation to protect the environment of the Country and its primary objective is to provide the basis from which the relevant ambient environmental standards applicable to Ethiopia can be developed, and to make the violation of these standards a punishable act. The Proclamation states that the "polluter pays" principle will be applied to all persons. Under this proclamation, the EPA is given the mandate for the creation of the function of Environmental Inspectors. These inspectors (to be assigned by EPA or regional environmental agencies) are given the authority to ensure implementation and enforcement of environmental standards and related requirements.

3.2.4.4 Proclamation on Conservation, Development and Utilization of Forests This Proclamation, Proc. No. 9411994, was issued in 1994 to provide for the Conservation, Development and Utilization of Forests. The objective of this Proclamation is to provide the basis for sustainable utilization of the country's forest resources. The Proclamation categorizes types of forest ownership (State, regional and private forests). It provides the power for designation, demarcation, and registration of forests to the Ministry of Agriculture (now MoARD) and Regional Governments. The Proclamation then goes on to give some specific direction for the utilization of State and Regional Forests, and lists prohibited activities within protected forests.

3.2.4.5 Proclamation on Rural Land Administration and Land Use This Proclamation, Proc. No. 45612005, came into effect in July 2005. The objective of the Proclamation is to conserve and develop natural resources in rural areas by promoting sustainable land use practices. In order to encourage farmers and pastoralists to implement measures to guard against soil erosion, the Proclamation introduces a Rural Land Holding Certificate, which provides a level of security of tenure. The MoARD is charged with executing the Proclamation by providing support and co- ordinating the activities of the regional authorities. Regional governments have an obligation to establish a competent organization to implement the rural land administration and land use law. According the Proclamation where land, which has already been registered, is to be acquired for public works, compensation commensurate with the improvements made to the land shall be paid to the land use holder or substitute land shall be offered. The Proclamation imposes restrictions on the use of various categories of land, for example wetland areas, steep slopes, land dissected by gullies, etc.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 17 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

3.3 Institutional and Administrative Framework

3.3.1 Federal and Regional Administration The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia comprises of the Federal States with nine Regional State members. The Federal Government acts from the centre to the regions and localities, and its respective duties and authority including fiscal matters at the different levels (Federal, Regional and Local) have been defined by the Constitution. The duties and responsibilities of the Regional States include planning, directing and developing social and economic programs as well as the administration, development and protection of natural resources of their respective regions. The basic administrative units in each Regional Government are the Woredas, which sub-units are the Kebeles in urban areas and farmers associations in rural areas. Further, based on their authority and responsibilities the regional governments have established Sectoral Bureau, Commissions and Authorities. In the project areas, the nearest and the strongest local administration is the Woreda which is a governmental organization that is structured to implement the federal and regional government policy and regulation. The Woreda administration has the responsibility to facilitate and monitor any development activity that is supposed to be undertaken in the area delineated in the wereda boundaries. Such responsibilities are discharged mainly through co-coordinating different offices to run their activities smoothly and effectively. For the day-to-day activities, the highest decision making organ at the Woreda level is the Woreda executive committee, which comprises of the Woreda administrator, vice administrator, chief secretary and others with varying responsibilities. The Woreda executive committee is accountable to the Woreda administration council, which is the elected political arm of the Woreda. Below the Woreda administration, at the grass root community level in both urban and rural areas there are Kebele and sub-Kebele administration for the rural areas. The Kebele and sub-Kebele administrations are responsible for co-coordinating and organizing the community development activities. There are a number of small villages and small towns in the project area and part of them will require land and houses to be acquired.

3.3.2 Environmental Protection Authority The National Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) was re-established under Proclamation No. 29512002 as an autonomous public institution of the Federal Government of Ethiopia entrusted with the protection and conservation of natural resources in Ethiopia. The general role of the EPA is to provide for the protection and conservation of the broad environment, through formulation of policies, strategies, laws and standards, which foster social and economic development in a manner that enhance the welfare of humans and the safety of the environment sustainable. One of the environmental policies of the EPA is to protect and rehabilitate the fundamental causes that lead to degradation, adverse effects and determine mitigation

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 18 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

measures. 'The policy is usually integrated and compatible to fit to a long term economic development strategy known as agricultural development-led industrialization (ADLI) and other key policies. As per sub-article 2 of article 6 of Proclamation No.9 of 1995, environmental development and management as well as protection in Ethiopia are designated. In this case the socio-environmental assessment needs to be reviewed and incorporated into different road project phases: at designing & planning, construction, monitoring, post-project evaluation and maintenance phases. The EPA is the Competent Agency at the Federal level in Ethiopia. It is, therefore, the responsibility of this authority in the EIA process to: ensure that the proponent complies with requirements of the EIA process; maintain co-operation and consultation between the different sectoral agencies throughout the EIA process; maintain a close relationship with the proponent and to provide guidance on the process; and evaluate and take decisions on the documents that arise from the EIA process.

3.3.3 Environmental Protection Unit The above described Proclamation No. 29512002 requires at the Federal level each sectoral ministry to establish in-house Environmental Protection Unit to ensure harmony with respect to implementation of the environmental proclamations and other environmental protection requirements. This Unit will form a lower level inter-sectoral co- ordination structure.

3.3.4 Regional Environmental Agencies In accordance with the principles of government decentralization and the Proclamation No. 29512002, each national regional state shall establish an independent regional environmental agency or designate an existing agency that shall, based on the Ethiopian Environmental Policy and Conservation strategy and ensuring public participation in the decision making process, be responsible for:

Coordinating the formulation, implementation, review and revision of regional conservation strategies, and Environmental monitoring, protection and regulation.

In addition, the regional environmental agencies shall ensure the implementation of federal environmental standards or, as may be appropriate, issue and implement their own no less stringent standards. These are expected to reflect the environmental management requirements at local level.

3.3.5 Ethiopian Roads Authority The Ethiopian Roads Authority (ERA) was established in 1951 through proclamation No.6311963 with responsibilities for the construction, improvement and maintenance of the Country's road network. The highest body in the management hierarchy is the board.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 19 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

k Environmental Monitoring and Safety Branch (EMSB) ERA's Environmental Monitoring and Safety Branch (EMSB) was established in January 1998 as Environmental Management Branch (EMB) under the Planning and Program Division of the Engineering and Regulatory Department. EMS6 major responsibilities are setting and implementing ERA's environmental guidelines in support of the national level requirements. The EMSB holds the capacity of advisory, co-ordination and supervision aspects that are pertinent to the road environmental impacts and implication assessment as well as co-ordination with the respective ERA district offices.

k Legal Division and Right-of- Way (ROW Branch ERA's Right-of-way Branch is responsible for making available the required land for roadlhighway construction and maintenance, the establishment of materials sources (borrow pits and quarries) and camp sites and for implementation of Resettlement Action Plans (RAP).Right-of-Way Branch in liaison with the respective regionalllocal authorities, Woreda councils, Kebele administrations and community representatives establishes the required compensation for structures, crop, vegetation and others, and effects payments to the PAPS.

3.3.6 World Bank

The resettlement action plan will be monitored, apprised and evaluated by The World ' Bank apart from the monitoring and evaluation to be done by the independent monitoring unit.

Metaferia Consulting Eng~neersplc In JV Core Consult~ngEng~neers

- - Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

4. STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATUIONS Information dissemination to, consultation with and participation of APs and involved agencies and stakeholders reduce the potential conflicts, minimize the risk of project delays, and enable the project to design resettlement and rehabilitation as a comprehensive development program to suit the needs and priorities of the APs, thereby maximizing the economic and social benefits of the investment. In light of the above, during the field visits of the project area, major government stakeholders were consulted, and the majority supports the road project. Those people who support the road project justified that the road would increase job opportunities to men and women improve business1economic activity and social prosperity. The road project will provide and make easy access to different places along the road, contribute for easy transportation of agricultural inputs from the regional and federal centers, accessibility of public transport on all times of the year, save time and money.

In the following three selectively study areas group discussions were conducted: 1. At Azernet Wereda, Lera Kebele 2. At Chaha wereda, Wedro Kebele 3. At Limo Wereda, Shurmo Town

The group discussions were facilitated by the social impact consultant and the discussion points include:

Briefing about the government plan to improve the road The attitude of the local community towards the proposed project Anticipated positive impacts of the project on socio-economic life of the community Anticipated adverse impacts of the project on socio-economic life of the community The requirement of community participation at different stages of project activities The means to avoid andlor mitigate anticipated adverse impacts of the proposed project The experience of the local community in similar development projects Factors to be considered for successful accomplishment of the project.

Although the group discussions were held in different areas, very similar opinions were expressed with regard to the points of discussion recorded above. In general the project area communities have a very positive attitude towards the proposed project since the existing road infrastructure has an influence on their socio- economic life. Discussion in all levels and the majorities of the community were, aware of the project and highly appreciate the project due to the social and economic benefit it gives. However, the most important issues, for which all bodies were much concerned about, were the damages to be caused and issues of:

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineen 21 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Receiving fair compensation Minimizing land acquisition Ensuring adequate land allocation and livelihood restoration Concerning the damages to be caused on private properties particularly buildings and commercial crops, they indicated that the compensation and rehabilitation issues would be easily managed by a committee that would comprise representatives from concerned parties such as the local administration, sector offices, community representatives, etc. In few towns like Lera town, the compensation of land for affected people is considered to be handled within the places reserved for the residential places of the town master plan study and identified the place to resettle any affected town community at places in such reserved for residential places. The community clearly expressed their attitude towards the proposed project on commercial sex and spread of HIVIAIDS. It is their fear as already started due to the easy transportation system as compared to the previously time when the mobility of the people were constrained.

The main solution suggested by the community is to change people behavior.

4.1 THE RAP DISCLOSURE

The following process will be followed by ERA to disclose the RAP: ERA will advertise the availability of the RAP at designated places to the public in the electronic media (including ERA'SWeb site) and government news papers,

The Federal government of Ethiopia will sent a letter to the World Bank to disclose RAP at info shop.

E.R.A will send copies of the final RAP to immediate stake holders including respective Regional government, zone and Wereda offices.

ERA will place the RAP at designated places and at least through the construction phases. These designated places may include government and non-government institutions along the project road.

Public disclosure of the RAP will be carried, thorough distribution of summaries describing the most important section of the RAP. Public disclosure of the draft RAP must be made to the affected persons in a form and language that they can understand. This may be in the form of a brochure or leaflet, to be provided to affected persons, in an accessible place.

Furthermore, before project implementation, the RAP consultant and the project director will prepare and conduct an information dissemination program in the project area.

To inform and explain the entitlement regulations and various options to the affected people prior to financial assistance;

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pic in JV Core Consulting Engineers 22 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

To make public consultations and awareness creation for local community members about relocations/rehabilitation; To minimize counter rumors and prevent unnecessary distress; To bring clarity on issues that might be raised related to entitlements and benefits through question and answer; and To solicit help from local government officials and others, and encourage their participation in the RAP implementation.

To ensure that vulnerable groups understand the process and their needs are specifically taken into consideration.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 2 3 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

5. DESCRIP'TION OF BASELINE CONDITION

5.1 Socio-Economic Environment The total length of the project road is about 121 km. The total road length falls in the Southern National Regional State. The socio-economic features along the proposed road alignment are briefly described below based on information obtained through field surveys, consultations with key informants and review of the previous study.

The proposed road routes traverse different settlements of the town including residential houses, commercial areas and government offices.

The main livelihood of the rural community is mixed farming while towns are petty trading and few inhabitants are government employee.

Social services in the project areas are available though not adequate. Services like private and government hospitals, water supply and sanitation facilities are inadequate. There is a telephone line while electricity is undertaking lining of the services currently.

In urban areas the major economic activities are small retailing. Since most of the urban community is from lower income status petty retailing is a dominant practice.

In both urban and rural areas women have a great responsibility contributing to household income by involving themselves in petty retailing activities.

5.1.1 Demography, Ethnicity and Religion

At present the project area (Welkite wereda, Chaha wereda, Gummer wereda, Mirab Azernet Berebere wereda and Limo weredea) has a population of about 832,521; of which 11Oh are urban and 89% are rural and the average household size is about 5.

The settlement pattern of the Wereda population is dispersed. The population densities varies from the 200 person/km2Kebena woreda, 300 person/km2 Chaha woreda and 450 person/km2In Mirab Azernet berebre woreda of 450 person/km2

There are a number of towns traversed by the project road. On the average towns have a population growth rate of 3% per year. The towns are characterized by a high density area of the country and the region. The towns have master plans. The proposed road should be based on these master plans.

The towns are located on SPNRS of the Gurage, Silte and Hadiya Zone and far about 285 km of Addis Ababa. The woredas included in this road are Kebene (Wolkite), Chaha (Endibir), Gumer (Arekit), Azernet Berbere West ( Lera).

The major ethnic residents are Gurage, Silte and Hadiya with few other ethnic communities. The major religious affiliations are Orthodox Christianity and Islam.

- - - Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 24 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

The population growth rate of the region is 2.9 % per annum with an average population density of 127 per sq.km; however, in the zones traversed by the project road the population density is higher: 265 per sq.km in Gurage zone, 313 in Silti zone and 346 in Hadiya zone. These densities are higher than the regional average. (Regional Statistical Abstract, June, 2006) The average family size in the project area is 5. The table below shows some of the demographic variables.

Table: 5.1 Demographic characteristics of the project area Wereda Population Size Family Population Urban I Rural I Total Size Density per sq. km Kebena 10.136 53.329 63.465 5 223 I ' I ' I ' I I I / Chaha 1 6,303 1 154,011 1 160,313 1 5 1 279 Gummer 4,393 183,570 187,964 5 522 Azernet 6,921 140,003 146,92 5 471 Limo 61,554 212,300 273,855 5 633 Source: SNNPRS, Regional Statistical Abstract, 2004-5,2006 Awassa

The age distribution of the population revealed that the young age (1-14) and the old age (65 and above) account for about 47% of the population, this figure makes the region to have a total dependency of 89.3 people over 100 productive age population.

5.2 Economic Activities

5.2.1 Major Economic Activity The major economic activity in the study area is agriculture particularly for the rural population where subsistence farming is the dominant means of earning a living. The major economic activity for urban residents is trading. Although there is some similarity in economic activity between the Woredas, there are also differences resulting from the ecological variation in the area. The economic activities prevailing in each Woreda are discussed below. The economy of the project area is predominantly mixed farming. 'The proposed road links the capital city with the Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples' Regional State (SNNPRS). It has an important contribution for the trade and transportation of agricultural input and outputs fromlto centers and SNNPRS. The most important contribution of the road is, linking the major towns of Wolkite, Endibir, Arekit, Lera, Hossaina. The towns along the roads have planned investment. The investment plans include food and oil processing industry, construction materials of bricks etc. It is also including regional hospital, colleges and Teachers training institute etc. The location of the towns along the road with good agricultural resources has good prospects for further development.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 25 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

5.2.2 Agriculture The existing farming system is traditional mixed farming based on animal traction and human labor that also includes animal rearing for milking, draught power and transportation. There is an excessive dependence on rain and no significant irrigation is found, as is the case in other parts of the country. The farming system is mixed farming with traditional method of using animal power for cultivation activity, not cultivated with modern means of cultivation. The land use pattern of the area is presented in table below. Regarding the land use of the area there are a large amount of forest and uncultivated land. For a population of about 743,213 people and a total of 113,540 hectares of cultivated land in all the wereda listed below, 1 hectare is available for 6 to 7 people. This indicates inadequacy and scarcity of cultivable land for the current population. More clearly the agricultural density of the project affected wereda as indicated in the table below shows the seriousness of land problem in the project area.

Table : 5.2 Land use of the Wereda WOREDA Land Use Kebena Chaha Gumer MlAzernet Limo Berebere

-----1.Cultivated land 74 41 6 5 70 55 2.Grazina Land 6 16 9 3 7 1 3.Forest, Bush, (71131111 15 1 l1 1 Shrubs 4.Cultivable land 6 10 4 2 5.Not Cultivable 5 40 2 7 9 6.0thzs 2 17 14 1 16 -- - 1 7.Total Area in 28,360 57,400 36,000 0 1I Hectares I I I 1 1 1 I i 8. Rural Population 1 53,329 1 154,011 1 183,570 1 140,003 1 212,300 1 9.AgricuItural density 3 7 8 6 9 Source: SNNPRS, Regional Statistical Abstract, 2004-5 June, 2006, Awassa) The livelihood of the community depends on a mixed agriculture at a very subsistence level. Farming activity is relatively better as compared to other areas of the country. The private investor's involvement in farming on about 8 agricultural projects creates off farm income source for daily laborer during harvesting periods. Major crops grown include maize, teff, potato, wheat, fruits and vegetables others are growing in different agro- ecological zones. Drought has been affecting the whole livelihood for most of the years in recent times. Livestock production is equally important as crop production in all parts of the project affected woreda. Cattle have a multipurpose benefit. It p'rovides power for farming, meat, milk, hides, manure, and service as an asset and source of income in drought and famine periods.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 26 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

5.2.3 ~ouseholdincome Communities in Villages along the alignment derive their income from a wide variety of sources. According to the discussion made with Development Agents of the wereda, the income sources include from sale of crops of Maize, Haricot beans, Teff ; sale of vegetables, potato, sale of Chat, Coffee and Livestock products. Among all sources Chat, Enset and coffee is found to be the major sources of income. The major share of their expenditure is food. Generally it is understood from the field survey that average income is based on the farm land size a farmer possesses, thus the relative importance of Chat, Enset and Coffee land to contribute income for the farmers is high in most of the villages. Although, it is possible to indicate the sources of income and the relative importance, it was difficult to arrive at a reasonable estimate on average rural HH income and expenditure of the communities in the different weredas along the road, based on either the key informant interviews or households survey. This is because data is not available on household's income and expenditure. Data also not available on secondary sources, thus it is found to be useless and not advisable to make assumptions in the absence of baseline data on the wereda or Zone level.

The importance of mixed farming is clear, it represents the most important income source in the great majority of villages. Non-agricultural income sources (e.g. migration, daily laborer in commercial farms,) also exist but limited. Overall, the economy of the community is highly mixed crop farming. Thus the major source of income of the farmers is crop farmirlg. This implies that the negative impact of the road on the farmland of the farmers results on a significant impact on the livelihood.

5.3 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SERVICES

5.3.1 Social services The project area has different social services including health, drinking water and schools up to senior high schools. Regarding social services coverage especially potable drinking water, health and education is presented below.

Table: 5.3 Social services coveraae" 1 Woreda I Drinking water (% I Health Educatio 1 Poverty 1 1) '1% n% I Situation 1 I Rural I Urban I 1 % At Zonal level 1 Cheha 31.4 Gumer 16 I I I I / Azrnet Berbere 1 8 14 1 55 52% 1 I ' I I I

I Limo 1 28 1 86- ~ 1 62 I I I I I I Source: Wereda Sector Offices

5.3.2 Economic services The towns along the road have access to telephone, electric power, post offices etc. Moreover there are banking and financial institutions serving the towns community.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 27 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

5.3.3 Housing The assessment of the housing situation in the project area has been based on information obtained from the respective wereda administration officials and field observations. In the project area, most of the housirlg units use similar materials for roofs and walls. Most of the units constructed in the rural areas have roofs and walls made of thatch and mud respectively. In urban and semi-urban areas, corrugated iron sheet is the most common material used for the construction of roofs, and wood and mud for the construction of walls. Nearly all the housing units in the project areas lack sanitary facilities. Rarely there is adequate room for the various household activities. In rural area ventilation is poor particularly with regard to the removal of smoke (from cooking and heating fires), which is ventilated through the door or a small opening. The typical houses in the wereda along the road are attached in the annex.4

5.3.4 Transport Services The principal travel modes of the project area are on foot, pack animals, and conventional vehicles, which can be considered as traditional, intermediate and conventional mode of transport respectively. Therefore the large majority of travel in the wereda is limited to the traditional means. Road transport in the wereda is very limited. The Wolkite -Hossaina road is one of the roads that exists in the project area. This road is gravel road serving both rainy and dry season. The road serves as the link road of different towns along the road from the Addis Ababa to the zonal town of Hossaina. However, the road has deteriorating and needs upgrading.

5.4 Socio Economic Implication The above analysis shows that the households depend mainly on farming and farming is the main sources of income. Apart from these, the majority of the households (52%) are not able to get their minimum basic need requirements. This indicates households who lose their land could lose substantial portion of their income for food. It implies therefore, that there should be adequate compensation and income restitution measures, if households are affected due to the road project.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 28 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repor?

6. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

6.1 Overall Assessment The potential environmental and social impacts of Welekite - Hossaina Road Upgrading Project have been identified and their significance analyzed based on data obtained from field surveys along the proposed alignments, local government offices, consultations with key stakeholders and a review of relevant documents. In addition, appropriate avoidance, mitigation and/or compensation measures have been identified and proposed for each identified impact.

The upgrading and operation of this road will result in a variety of environmental and social impacts. These will be both beneficial and adverse effects. It is definite that implementing the project will benefit much than the adverse impacts. The potential economic benefits of road rehabilitation and upgrading projects derive from:

Savings in vehicle operating costs. Savings in road maintenance expenditures. Time savings to passengers and freight. Reductions in the number and severity of accidents. Induced economic development, such as industrial, agricultural or tourist activities that were previously constrained by poor access. Social benefits arising from the increased mobility of the population and improved accessibility to health, education and other services. Governmental interconnection between Addis-Ababa and Hossaina, which is a major city of Southern Regional state, will be facilitated. Investment will be encouraged along the road and in the towns crossed, which in turn open employment opportunity for the local community and others as well.

Nevertheless, there will be several adverse impacts on the physical, natural and socio- economic environment. The major potential environmental issues include the followiqg, but not limited: Loss of productive lands under various uses due to land acquisition for the road right-of-way, establishment of campsites and material processing and storage sites; Soil erosion/impairment of soils effected by road construction activities and disturbance of established natural drainage systems; Water pollution resulted from disturbance of water courses during construction of culverts and bridges, enhanced soil erosion, Loss of naturally growing (indigenous) trees as well as planted trees due to land acquisition for the activities mentioned above; Loss of infrastructure such as housing units which provide residential, business, commercial or industrial functions; Disruption of utility services such as water supply pipelines, telephone lines and power transmission lines;

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 29 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Disruption of movements of people and animals due to increased traffic volume and speed; Increased risks of communicable diseases including HIVIAIDS; and lncreased risks of accidents to the local communities and their animals during the construction period.

Several of these effects will be short-term and reversible, stemming from ground disturbance, operation of equipment, construction camps, and construction materials processing and storage. But, many impacts will be permanent. Details of the main potential social issues together with the corresponding avoidance, mitigation or compensation measures are described in the subsequent sections.

6.2 Positive Impacts of the Proposed Road Project Upgrading of the Wolkite-Hossaina Road would obviously bring several positive impacts. It will contribute a vital role for the growth of the national economy. Also, the road will improve the road safety, import-export trade scenario; improve social services, transport facilities, income generation and employment opportunities for both migrant and local laborers, etc. These and other beneficial effects are briefly described below.

6.2.1 Job Opportunity during construction period The creation of temporary jobs can be considered as positive impact of the road construction to the local people. Some individuals may gain skills that can be applied in other road construction projects too. Further direct opportunities include entrepreneurial development as a result of the increased population and increased road usage. This includes items such as supplies, accommodations, food outlets, restaurants etc. The general economic improvement of the project influence area due to increased access and increased traffic flow will create further indirect job opportunities. Markets will be much more accessible, thereby providing people the opportunity to increase production and access to external markets with their products.

6.2.2 Provision of easy access mobility An upgraded road will support the provision of a wider and better range of services.

' Improved access will make possible increased mobility of government officials and employees, goods, materials and the resources required to run the day-to-day services. With improved services, the living condition of the people in the project area in particular, and a country as a whole will be improved.

6.2.3 Gender lmpacts Women in road projects could work as daily laborers and in other similar activities in the project implementation. Female-headed households in particular could benefit from the roadwork through employment opportunities that would be created. They also gain working skill that can be applied in other similar activities. It also helps to develop confidence and self-sufficiency among women who are involved in the road construction work.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 30 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

The other benefit of the project for the women during the construction phase is that it would help to start small business such as opening teahouses, meal houses, small shops etc. Therefore, in order to exploit these advantages, the project owners should encourage use of local manpower during the construction phase of the project, giving priority for women.

6.2.4 Contribution to Economic Growth With enhanced movement and accessibility along the road, the economy of people served by this road would be improved, contributing its share to the overall economic improvement of the country. Other benefits such as the reduction of vehicle operation costs, reduction of travel time, reduction of dust emission and associated health impacts would be achieved. With the road upgrading, there will be good opportunities for commerce and trade to improve and provide better quality services. Moreover, lowering the costs of motorized transport may enable a more steady supply of goods and services into the area and facilitate the movement of agricultural produces and other import and export items.

6.2.5 Improvement of Drainage A well-designed road will mitigate the drainage problems on the existing road. The new road prism and drainage structures will improve drainage on the road surface, across and alongside the road, thus minimizing erosion and siltation problems during the operation phase. Together, these measures will improve traffic conditions and reduce hazards for both motorized and non-motorized traffic.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 31 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action ,Plan Report

6.2.6 Summary of identified potential impacts The potential environmental and social impacts identified and described in the preceding sections are summarized in Table: 6.1 below.

6.3 Adverse impacts of the proposed Road Project Table 6.1: Summary of Identified Potential lmpacts of the Proposed MlAN IDENTIFIED POTENTMIAL IMPACTS Physical Environment I New land acquisition Construction spoils

I Air and noise pollution XXX Overall impact XX Natural Environment 1 Impacts on natural vegetation I XX I Loss of indigenous trees 1 XX Loss of planted trees Impacts on sensitive areas* XXX 11 Socio-economic Environment I Loss of farmland XXX I( Impacts on built up areas 1 XXXX 1 I Impact on roadside infrastructure I XXXX 1 Disruption of public utilities XXXX Interruption of existing traffic XX Impact on road crossing people and XX animals Public health issues XX /( Traffic safety 1 XXX 1 I Impacts on sensitive areas' XXX XXX Burial Places

XXX = significant, requires particular attention & mitigation attention X(+) = less significant, but requires XXXX = very significant, observation requires particular attention & I mitigation 1 I XX = significant, requires mitigation 1 ~

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 32 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

6.3.1 Impacts on Physical Environment

6.3.1.1 Land Loses Implementation of the road upgrading project will cause land losses mainly due to land acquisition for construction of the new road sections, and widening of existing road sections. It will also result from land taking for extraction of construction materials, establishment of construction camps, disposal of spoil materials, and storage and processing of construction materials. Land acquisition and road construction activities will result in loss of land under various uses and erosion or impairment of the topsoil, which is productive for agriculture (crop production and grazing) and vegetation growth. The existing road alignment will be widened to 30 meters width. If the road has to be upgraded to a 30m ROW standard, it will require acquisition of land from adjacent areas. As the width of the existing ROW is on average about 20m, the upgrading project will require on average additional 10m width resulting in a loss of about 254 ha of land. As most of the land along the road is occupied by intensive farms and different construction activities, acquisition of this land area can bring severe socio-economic implications. Construction of the upgrading road will require quite large quantities of construction materials, which will be extracted from existing quarry and borrow sources and newly opened sites. Along the road, there might be material sites. Further exploitation of existing sources or opening new sites will mainly cause damages to the remnant vegetation or trees found at those sites and affect the landscape. Other potential sources of impacts on land are construction camps and storage and processing of construction materials as well as disposal of spoil materials from road cuts during construction, especially if they are tipped onto adjacent productive lands.

I Table : 6.2 Summary of Land Use alorlg the road 1

Farmland and grazing Land 65 17 Built up area 2.5 1

* 30 meter is taken for the calculation of area covered by each land use type along the road corridor

> Mitigation Measures

The following measures are proposed in order to avoid or mitigate the anticipated impacts to acceptable levels: Land cannot be bought in Ethiopia and that loss of land will be compensated in kind, if land is available in the vicinity of the residents of the PAPs or elsewhere near to the project area within the same socio cultural environment of the PAPs. If this is not possible it will be mitigated with fair compensation of cash payment.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 33 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Reporf

Reinstate access roads and detours by removal of existing pavement material, looseninglscarifying of compacted soils, and spreading of topsoil. Provide appropriate drainage and erosion protection measures in order to minimize erosion and loss of land in adjacent areas. Minimize side-tipping of spoil materials from road cuts onto adjacent productive lands by depositing it only in approved depots and by landscaping and planting with appropriate vegetation to improve the visual value of those sites. Preserve topsoil from the new road sections, road widening, borrow sites and contractor's facilities for re-use on embankment slopes and for re-filling borrow sites and reinstating the land taken for detours and temporary roads.

6.3.1.2 Impacts on Water Resources During the construction period, the major sources of impacts on streams and rivers crossed by the project road include excavation for foundation of structures, soil erosion caused by road construction activities, spillage of pollutants (fuel, oil) and discharge of sewage and other fluid wastes from construction camps. These will cause significant increase in sediment loads of the streams and pollution of the river water. Most of the streams are already highly polluted and the road project will aggravate the problem.

Effluents discharged from camp sites, spills of chemicals and pollutants from used fuel and oil and accidents, as well as cement slag during construction, can all pose pollution risk to streams intercepted by the road.

9 Mitigation Measures

Avoid polluting of rivers or streams during concreting work from cement slag. Avoid pollution of surface and ground water by oil and fuel spillages by proper handling and adequate equipment. Dispensing points of fuels and lubricants should have drip pans and for dispensing of petroleum products e.g. fuel funnels shall be used. Avoid leakages of vehicles and construction by regular and effective maintenance. Avoid accidental spills of hazardous chemicals through good practice. Avoid pollution of river or stream water during concreting work from cement slag and oil and fuel spills by providing suitable diversion andlor other appropriate measures. Avoid cleaninglwashing of construction equipment in streams or rivers.

6.3.1.3 Air and Noise Pollution Presently poor air quality due to smoke from vehicle exhaustion is considered as a major nuisance to roadside residents, shops and businesses in the towns and villages along the road.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 34 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

During the construction period, air and noise pollution will result mainly from the road construction activities, operation of quarries and borrow sites and asphalt and crushing plants. Excavations for the road construction and extraction of construction materials, blasting of rocks, operation of concrete batching, asphalt and aggregate production, loading and unloading of materials, and movement of construction vehicles over unpaved roads will bring significant increase in suspended particles, exhaust emissions and noise levels. These will cause nuisance to local residents and business activities.

The road corridor is densely populated (living in towns and rural villages) and highly used for agricultural and business activities. The road construction activities may hamper these economic activities unless appropriate mitigation measures are implemented. In addition, there are many sensitive receptors including residential areas, public health clinics, schools and religious places (churches and mosques) in the impact zones. Consequently, dust and noise pollution generated from the road construction activities can be a major nuisance to a large number of people, especially in towns and villages along the road.

P Avoidance and Mitigation Measures As discussed above the air pollution due to construction and operation of the road will be significant, while the road corridor is relatively populated and there are many sensitive noise and dust pollution receptors. Therefore, good site practices must be followed by the Contractor and other appropriate avoidance and mitigation measures implemented to reduce dust production, nuisance noise and vehicle emissions. In order to minimize dust and noise levels and its nuisance and health effects to receptors, the following measures are recommended: Traffic speeds should be restricted and water regularly applied on the access roads and detours especially for those sections running through towns, villages and industrial/commerciaIestablishments. Diesel powered machinery and vehicles should be well maintained to reduce excessive exhaust emissions. The contractor's site establishment should be set up at a minimum distance of 3 km in order to avoid or minimize any form of nuisance to neighboring areas. Construction producing noise pollution should be minimized or rescheduled so as not to occur at night or on locally recognized holidays or religious days. All machinery and plants should conform to the applicable noise standards, and plants should be provided with effective noise mufflers. Equipment and vehicles that show excessive emissions of exhaust gases and noise shall not be used until appropriate repairs or adjustments are made. Construction workers should adhere to health and safety standards pertaining to noise, such as wearing ear protection when operating plant or heavy machinery. A well designed traffic management plan shall consider traffic safety and make statements on working hours for materials transport in order to avoid transport- related disturbances for local residents as well as road users.

- Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 35 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

6.3.2 Impacts on socio-economic environment The previous section of this report has identified positive and negative impacts of the envisaged road project on socio-economic resources. Positively, the road will reduce risks of traffic accidents, save traveling time and contribute to the overall growth of the national economy. The project will have also some adverse social/environment effects. Types of properties that would be damaged I affected are listed in the baseline situation section of this report. Therefore, negative aspects of the road project can be divided into six broad categories: Damage on infrastructure services, damage on cultural resources, health issues, and community disturbances, disruption of utility services and loss of farmland, pasture and trees.

6.3.2.1 Damages of Infrastructure It is mentioned that there are potential negative impacts of the road on rural as well as urban communities. In urban and rural areas, houses made up of wood and mud, hollow concrete and multi-story buildings will be affected.

The Consultant has estimated that a total of 772 residential buildings are located within the Project ROW and will have to be relocated. Permanently affected houses are not located in one area, but are spread across the 121 km route. Impact on residences will not require full resettlement, but will involve shifting the residence to a different portion of the property (out of the ROW)or, in the case of a town, to within the vicinity. The number of housing unit, affected along the road and the total cost estimated is summarized below. Table : 6.3 Summary of House affected along the road

houses in Birr ~~~~~~~pqpiq~ ~pqpi%q~riq-=l~~ 12211611411951199- ~1pqpEr~~piiiqpqpq~

772 houses of different sizes and type would be affected. The number of housing units with their value are indicative and assumed that number of houses will change and updated as the alignment work is finalized. During the project construction, a number of household and institution office fences will be affected by road in the ROW. The survey result indicates that a total of 36,409 meters of fences will be affected. Compensation is based on a combination of fence type and values. The total compensation estimate is birr 822,304. The damaged fence structure type with estimated cost is presented below.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 36 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

Table : 6.4 Summarv of Residential Fences affected along the road

I I I 1 I /I / Limo 78 5 3 86 158,206 ~1

It is anticipated that water supply lines, poles and other infrastructures will be affected in different towns and villages during the construction period because of their location within the right of way. Prior to the commencement of construction, all public services that will be affected should be relocated to minimize disruptions to the services.

In this regard the consultant makes the Ethiopian Telecommunication aware of the possible impact on telephone poles within the ROW. It estimates the relocation cost for the whole poles along the project road. The estimated cost is Birr 797,517. To this effect, the implementing agency should contact concerned public services agents and settle the amount that is needed for the relocation activities, before construction begins. Information on the possible impacts on the road alignments on utilities are shown in the table below.

Table 6.5: Summary of impacts associated with utility services and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase)

Water Supply & Sewerage Authority, Pay compensations. towns 2 Telephone Permanent Throughout, Relocate telephone lines, lines particularly in Consult Telecommunications densely settled Corporation, pay towns compensations. 3 Electricity Permanent In towns and factory Consult Electric Power areas Corporation, pay compensations.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Table: 6.6 Summary of potential impacts associated with infrastructure services and suggested mitigation measures ( Construction phase)

SL Issue Duration Location Proposed mitigations of effect (chainage) No Housing units Permanent Mostly in Consult local authorities, (residential - Towns notify relevant stakeholders existing, under about the project through construction, official letters, and buildirlgs, fences, discontinue on-going etc.), construction activities. Minimize road width, allow, affected persons to salvage building materials, pay compensations

6.3.2.2 Private plantation, and Trees It is previously mentioned that, agriculture is the main stay of the people residing along the road with minor petty trading in urban areas. The road will provide job opportunities to local communities and migrant workers. However, there will be disruption of economic activities (farming, grazing land, plantation etc.) and will be affected either temporarily or permanently.

A total of 2,796 people are affected due to the project. The sum of households (PAPs) who were affected due to loosing different assets should not necessarily be equal since different households may lose different assets at the same time at different locations. Furthermore- a total 105 different assets of governments mostly farm land have been affected. The details are given in Table- 6.5

Table : 6.7 PAPs Summary for different Agricultural Assets Who lost different assets PAPs PAPs PAPs Total loosing Loosing PAP PAP Loosing Project Coffee, Trees of Woreda loosing loosing PAP losing Vegetable affected Hope, (Tsede,Girar, Farm Grazing eucalyptus s & Fruits people Enset Zigba, Woira land Land plantation and etc) in in number Chat number Chaha Gummer MAzern

Lemo 464 Kebul 40 66 1 67 0 Kebena 7 0 1 0 0 Total 2796 1108 263 21 22 851 648 "Trees Include (A ainly Acacia abyssinica, Olea europea war. Africans, etc )

Metafer~aConsulting Eng~neersplc In JV Core Consult~ngEng~neers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Since the woodland is the main source of fuel for the households and for the construction material, its scarcity and its loss would cause considerable impact on household, hence compensation should be given for this purpose. There are eucalyptus plantations going to be affected within the ROW of the road. The major plantation in the project area is eucalyptus trees. But there are other major food plantation called "EnsetV(FalseBanana).

Compensation for crop loss is made on the assumption that only the land affected on the ROW will result in permanent loss. The remainder of the land will be affected for a maximum period of three years only while construction of the road is underway. Compensation will be based on the productivity of the land and on current market prices of the crops.

Based on the availability of the farm land on the project area where PAPS reside, permanent cultivated land loss will be compensated on a land-for-land basis. If there is shortage of land, however (as is generally the case in Ethiopia), loss of cultivated land will be compensated in cash at a rate equivalent to 10 times of Average Annual Output Value (AAOV) of previous three years. Individuals or entities legally using affected plots will be compensated in terms of a land-for-land mechanism through redistribution of land within the village territory.

6.3.2.3 Loss of Eucalyptus and Other Economically Valuable Trees The main type of plantation in the Project area is Eucalyptus, Chat, Enset, Coffee and other trees include (Mainly Acacia abyssinica, Olea europea var. Africana, etc )

Based on a compensation method used on different road projects and power transmission projects the consultants uses the methods as discussed below. The assessment of eucalyptus production and the market prices are based on averages collected from different Eucalyptus plantation regions in the country.

Eucalyptus yields and prices are based on age, height and diameter of trees, and their functions (e.g. house construction, electricity poles, fuel wood etc). Based on this eucalyptus trees are classified into three major classes: 1. Small (at seedling ) 2. Medium 3. Large (Pole). Prices are 0.25 cents per pieces, 6 birr and 12 birr for small, medium and large trees respectively. Compensation is valued at equivalent average annual income lost per each tree. (Average price)

Table: 6.8 Number of affected eucalyptus and their cost Birr Woreda Eucalyptus Eucalyptus Eucalyptus affected in affected Big Size affected Medium Small Size number* in number Size in number

I I I 1 Chaha 3,744 8.022 14.308 Gummer 9,465 12,701 50,139 Azernetberbere 3,315 20,168 1,188,743 1Lemo 23,057 1 Kebul 19,004 6,670 1.350 Kebena 40 250 290 Total 38,120 55,670 1,277,887

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 39 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

I Unit price (Birr ) I 12 6 0.25 Total cost (Birr) 457,440 334,020 319,472 I Total Cost I 1,I 10,932 * These are seedlings of eucalyptus

> Hops (Gesho trees)

Gesho trees are located in Chaha, Gummer, Azernet Berbere and Limo woreda along the Road. Since no data on hops productivity is available from the relevant sector offices to measure compensation, the following valuations are based on discussions held with local farmers and agronomists. It is assumed that a tree will yield 20 kg of leaves twice (40kg) per annum. The regenerative frequency of the life of the tree is 5 years. The current market value of hops is 1 Birr per kg. Compensation is paid for 5 years on a total of 712 affected trees. The total amount of compensation due is thus Birr 142,400.

Table : 6.9 Summary of Gesho (Hope tree) trees affected along the road

Gummer 11 40 440 1 2,200 Azernetberbere 1 40 40 1 200 Limo

TOTAL 71 2 28,480 142,400

> Coffee Compensation for coffee is based on productive yield per hectare. Some 400 kgs will be produced per hectare on the average traditional farm. On each hectare there will be 3100 trees; each tree will yield 0.129 kg of coffee. Thus, using the current market prices of coffee at 15 Birr per kg, compensation is paid for 7 years. A total of 1,728 coffee trees will be affected by the Project. The total amount of compensation is therefore estimated to be 23,406.

Table : 6.10 Summary of Coffee trees affected along the road

At early stage of maturity

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 40 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

> Fruits Trees In the project area there are a number of fruit trees including mainly banana, avocado, mango, zietun, kazmir, etc). Data for all fruits type regarding the yields are not available at offices. However, consultation with agronomists and local farmers gives indication which is useful for compensation purpose. The presentation below gives us for the major fruits grown in the project area. The average is computed to apply for the compensation estimate.

> Banana 32000 kg to 35000 kg will be produced per hectare on a traditional farm. On each hectare there will be an average of 1250 trees; each of which will yield 25 kg. The life of a banana tree is 7-10 years. Thus using the current market prices of banana at 2.5 Birr on farm gate price per kg, the compensation is paid for 7 years loss.

> Avocado 25000 kg of avocado will be produced per hectare on a traditional farm. On each hectare there will be 1000 branches; each branch will yield 25 kg. The life of the tree is estimated at 10-15 years. Thus using the current market prices of avocado at 2.50 Birr at farm gate price per kg, the compensation is paid for 7 years loss.

P Papaya 19,800 kg of papayas are produced per hectare on a traditional farm. On each hectare there will be an average of 1100 trees, each of which will yield 18 kg of fruit. The life of the tree is 4 years. Thus using the current market price of papaya at 2.50 Birr per kg, compensation is paid for 4 years loss.

Thus an average yield for different fruits trees grown in the project area is assumed to be 15 kg, life of the tree will be 5 years and price is taken to be 2.50 birr. Thus the compensation is presented below. Table : 6.11 Summary of Fruit trees affected along the road

Limo 4,480 5 22,400 2.5 224,000

TOTAL 4,147 28,975 289,750

> Enset Trees ( False Banana trees) Enset provides more amount of foodstuff per unit area than most cereals. It is estimated that 40 to 60 Enset plants occupying 250-375 sq. meters can provide enough food for a family of 5 to 6 people." - Country Information Brief, FA0 June 1995

There will be 1500 trees per hectares. The affected part in the project includes 57,139 trees, equivalent to roughly 38 hectares. There is a yield level of 5,000 kg per hectares on good management and favorable soil. However, in our project area there is variation in soil suitability, thus on average 3,000 kg per hectares could be taken as a yield level in the

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 41 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

project area. Taking this yield level the project area affects a total of 114,278 kg. Thus, using the current market prices of Enset at 2 Birr per kg, compensation is paid for 7 years. Table : 6.12 Summary of Enset (False Banana) Trees affected along the road

(Birr) 300 Chaha k---=-----9,151 6 0 18,302 2 256,228 300 Gummer 23,169 15 0 46,338 2 648,732 300 14,162 9 0 28,324 2 396,536 300 Limo 1 5,913 4 0 11,826 2 1 165,564 I I 300 1 Geta 4.744 3 0 9.488 2 132.832 I' I I I' I 1

I( TOTAL 57.139 38 1 14.278 1.599.892

k Chat: Chat is grown along the road on different places of Chaha and Limo woreda. On average 1500 kg will be produced per hectares by traditional farming. However, in the project area when the survey was conducted the plant was found at different maturity stage. For the project compensation purpose it is assumed to take half of the yield level since many of the plants are not matured. On each hectare there will be 600 trees; each tree will yield 2.5 kg leaves per year, assumed to take 1.25 yield level since most of them are not matured. The regenerative frequency of the! life of the tree is 7-10 years. On this project, ten years of crop loss is compensated. The current market price of chat is 30 Birr at farm level. The total number of chat trees affected in the project area is 2,982. The total amount of compensation is therefore estimated to be 782,775 Birr.

Table : 6.13 Summary of Chat trees affected along- the road

Wereda Chaha 858 1.25 1,073 30 225,225 ----- Azernet 110 1.25 138 30 7

TOTAL 2,982 3,728 782,775

9 Indigenous Trees

The following trees have economic value: Acacia abyssinica (girar), Syzigium guineense (dokma), Cordia Africana (wanza), Ficus vasta(warka) and Olea europea var.africana (woira).

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pic in JV Core Consulting Engineers 42 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Most of these trees do not produce new yields after cutting. Due to this, farmers usually cut the trees after they have matured and sell them for different purposes. Thus, the compensation rate of these trees is based on current market prices. The average market price is 50 Birr a single matured tree.

The total number of affected trees in this category in the Project area is 18,704. The total amount of compensation is therefore estimated to be Birr 935,200. Table : 6.14 Summary of Indigenous trees affected along the road

I I I I 1 Azernetberebere 1 4.750 50 237.500 1 I ~imo 1 4,092 I 50 I 204,600 11 1 Geta 1 5,838 I 50 1 291,900 11 1 TOTAL

, > Farm lands Compensation for crop loss is made on the assumption that only the land affected on the ROW will result in permanent loss. The remainder of the land will be affected for a maximum period of three years only while construction of the road is underway. Compensation will be based on the productivity of the land and on current market prices of the crops.

Based on the availability of the farm land on the project area where PAPS reside, permanent cultivated land loss will be compensated on a land-for-land basis. If there is shortage of land, however (as is generally the case in Ethiopia), loss of cultivated land will be compensated in cash at a rate equivalent to 10 times of Average Annual Output Value (AAOV) of previous three years. Individuals or entities legally using affected plots will be compensated in terms of a land-for-land mechanism through redistribution of land within the village territory.

Table : 6.15 Summary of farm lands affected along the road Wereda 1 Compensation Chaha Gummer MAzernet Lemo Kebul Kebena Farmland in hectares 11.17 0.21 12.32 4.34 0.41 0.23 Productivity per hectares in 15 15 15 15 15 15 Quintals Price per Quintals 600 600 600 600 600 600 Compensation for one Year 100,530 1,890 110,880 39,060 3,690 2,070 Compensation for 10 Years 1,005,300 18,900 1,108,800 390,600 36,900 20,700 Total 2,581,200

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Table: 6.16 Summary of potential impacts associated with loss of farmlands, pasture and trees and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase)

facilities, and dumping new road alignment. Pay compensations, lo

9 Loss of grazing land

Grazing land in Ethiopia has two types, private and unprotected communal grazing. The communal one owns by the local administration while private one is owns and managed by the individual farmers. In few places, alongside the road within the ROW, there are farm and grazing lands of individual and communal which have to be cleared to allow for the construction of the road. Thus, there will be damages for both communal and private grazing lands during constructions.

Based on the information available from the survey about 263 families are likely to lose grazing land. The total quantity of grazing land to be affected is 11.4 ha. The project affected persons will be compensated from the communal grazing land available in their respective kebele near to their residents.

Table: 6.17 Details of families losing grazing land

1 Gummer I 36 I 2.01 1 I Kebul I 66 I 2.6 1 Total 263 11.4

6.3.2.4 Impacts of Cemeteries

Cemeteries are plenty on the fringe of the ROW of the project on the stretch of 1Okm (See Table 6.18 ) . All are in one wereda called Mirab Azernet Berebere beginning at km 89 up to 99 in places called Mugo and Bilalo (Local Administration). All are protected by

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

mud walls to the road side and have stone fences. The cemeteries are found within the ROW of the road. The largest cemetery cover an area of 900.m2 and the smallest cover an area of 16m2. Especially at km 89.8 there are two cemeteries on both sides of the road. They belong to two different clan called Golelsha and Adengeza while they belong tosame nationality of Called Silti nationality.

These cemeteries as confirmed by the community (The Religious representative and Imam, Kebele chairperson and other community representative), were built after the road constructed.

The community reported that if the road construction is surely implemented they confirmed to relocate. However, the community proposed two conditions to relocation the cemetery:

1. The cost relocation should be covered by the implementing agency and, 2. The number of dead bodies should counted and get equal number of burial space or burrow ground not to be put all dead bodies in single borrow.

Based on the above community idea the study consultant recommends the following:

i) In places of ( km 89+800 at both right and left side) where there are narrow places on both right and left side, the right of way might be reduced to 20 and 15 meters as appropriate. ii) The mud walls around the cemeteries are reinforced /rebuilt with stones or other more durable materials, in collaboration with the local communities. Half width construction may also be constructed on the above mentioned stretch. iii) If all the above mitigation measures are not possible, relocation should be considered, and require to be relocate in a places where the community agrees to put the cemetery.

Cemeteries relocation and Wall Reinforcements Cost estimate:

From km 89 + 800 to km 119-300, the road alignment has about 9 Muslim graveyards. Four of them are within 30 meters right of way, while 1 is within the 20 meters right of way and four outside the 30 meters right of way. To protect the graves, the right of way along the road section with graveyards will be reduced to 20 meters, the centerline will be shifted where possible and mud walls around the cemeteries will be strengthened1 reinforced with stone walls. Should these actions not be adequate, a budget provision has been made to relocate about 200 graves, from various graveyards, if need be. The unit cost for each greave yards is estimated to be Birr 500. The estimated cost for strengthening the walls is Birr 132,600 based on Birr 300 per M' of stone wall. The total cost for the potential relocation of individual graves from various graveyards is birr 232,600 both for relocation and reinforcements.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pic in JV Core Consulting Engineers 45 Welkite ~ossainaRoad Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Photo 3: Burial sites in the ROWboth at right and Left side is narrow Table: 6.1 8. Summary of cemeteries

Chainage in (km) Burial place for Local administration Offset from the centerline (Kebele) Name Remarks 89+800 Muslim religion Bilalo 15 meters on both Falls at ROW, blievers s~des needs barrierlprotection structure 91 + 200 Muslim religion B~lalo 1 14 meters LHS Partly falls in ROW, believers Half width construction, Shift the road alignment to the right side and Protect the cemetery by barriers (retaining strucure). 92+000 Muslim religion Half width construction. bel~evers Protection structure is

I needed, 92+800 1 Muslim religion Bilalo 15 meters LHS Falls on border of ROW 1 believers width Shift centerline to right side Provide protection I 1 structure 1 93 +OOO I Muslim religion I Bilalo 1 17 meter LHS 1 Out side of ROW believers Barrier1 protection structure Muslim religion Bilalo 16 meters LHS Provide protection strucure believers Muslim religion Jaremo keb 10 meter LHS Shift road alignments to believers right side Provide protectiodretaining

Jaremo kebele 8 meters LHS *Relocate graves within 7 believers meter width, about lOOm length *Provide protection structure 119+ 300 Christian religion Limo woreda 23 meters LHS Out s~deof ROW width believers

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 46 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

6.3.2.5 Health issues Health issues are identified and expected to occur with the commencement of the construction. Major health issues are associated with HIVIAIDSlSTDs, labor migration and camping sites. a) HIVIAIDSlSTDs: HIVIAIDS and sexually transmitted diseases are potential health threats that can be aggravated by the project.

b) Labor migration: This is also mentioned in the assessment report but not elaborated. Road projects require adequate human labor. Road projects create employment opportunities for local communities as well as for migrant laborers coming from distant locations. Migrant -laborers in the road sector are young (15-24), sexually active with no family and coming from other WoredasIRegions. This age group is largely exposed to HIVIAIDS and STDs. The migrant labor force will compete also for other resources and services by pressurizing host communities. This could be source of conflicts and misunderstandings.

c) Camping sites: This will be a major health issue at construction phase of the project. The previous report has also addressed it adequately. Camping has both social and environmental impacts. Site selection outside settlement areas, camp management, sanitary condition, etc. are some of the critical issues that need due attention at a latter stage.

Table : 6.19 Summary of potential health issues and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase)

awareness, recruit workers from local

6.3.2.6 Community disturbances Communities would benefit from the project. But there will be also disturbances, which are manageable if due consideration is given to proposed mitigation measures. Major community disturbances of the envisaged project are described below:

a) Noise and dust: There are unavoidable temporary effects of any road project. The previous report has adequately explained these issues. Noises from machineries, other

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 47 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

vehicles would disturb communities residing along the roadside. The road project passes through settlement areas, hotels and small factories and other huge establishments, which might affect quality of their produces due to dust.

6) Safety issues/standards: Increased traffic accident is unintended social effect to local communities and animals. This would happen through construction and operation stages of the project. Although traffic accident is an adverse social effect, there are systems that help reducing rate of accidents through introducing safety measures on a continuous basis, and through collaborations with different stakeholders.

During the construction period there will be equipment and machinery movements that could increase the risk of accidents to the local communities (particularly children) and their cattle, especially when they are crossing the road. Traffic accident would also be apparent during the operation phase of the road.

Mitigation measures include: put traffic signs on relevant sites, work closely with traffic police and schools, use local media to convey messages, etc. c) Disruption of movements of people and animals: Movement of people and animals will be disrupted because access roads and crossings will be blocked temporarily or permanently. Disruption of movements of people and animals can be to different places for different purposes. Movement of people to market places, to farms, to churches/mosques, offices, etc. and movement of animals to grazing areas and water points can be restricted and time taking. 'Therefore, it is essential to provide foot paths which assist them for easy access for the above services.

Table : 6.20 Summary of potential community disturbances and suggested mitigation measures (construction phase)

ut signs. Work closely with traffic police nd schools, use local mass medias to

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineen 48 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

6.3.2.7 Potential impacts of campsites The location of campsites in relation to settlement sites has an effect on the environment. The following summarizes the potential impacts of campsites: Land will be needed for construction of camps. The land that is taken could not be farmland. Effluents discharged from campsites, spills of chemicals and pollutants from used fuel and oil and accidentally spilling as well as cement slag during construction can pose pollution risk to streams intercepted by the road. Unless campsites are suitably located, there could be a health hazard to existing towns or settlements by transmission of diseases. The campsites may have to share limited resources like water that could be already in short supply for the residents. Overloading of existing facilities (health care, potable water supply, law violation by the workforce, garbage disposal facilities) could occur.

6.3.2.8 Impact from immigrant workers Migrant workers can potentially cause personal conflicts with local workers. Ability to pay more of migrant workers will tend to inflate local prices and compete for the limited resources, which eventually cause bad feelings with local population. Some immigrant as well as local workers may behave badly, especially when they drink alcohol during the salary days and may disturb the peace of the residents. Incidents of sexually transmitted diseases like HIV may also increases as movement of workforce increases. Hence, these issues have to be considered before hand and camps should be managed properly. Other mitigation measures mentioned in this report should be implemented.

6.3.2.9 Impacts on Vulnerable Houseliolds Special attention will be paid to the vulnerable groups, defined as those already experiencing hardship (e.g. as a result of extreme poverty, sickness, female-headed households, the aged, etc.) and for whom loss of landlproperty could lead to further hardship. In order to ensure that resettlement does not further exacerbate the conditions of these groups, certain incentives will have to be offered to them in consultation with community representatives.

Special attention of providing transportation facility in carrying their goods in time of relocation, giving priority in time of land compensation, arrangements of bank book account to put safely their cash compensation, may need more assistance during land clearing and rebuilding their new houses etc, are required for theses households. The survey result indicated that there are 117 vulnerable groups out of which 36 are agedldisabled while 81 are female headed households. The table below presents the summary of the vulnerable group. Details with affected persons name is annexed in Annex No7.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 49 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repo~

Table: 6.21 Vulnerable Groups Total Towns( Villages) Vulnerable Group 1 SicknessIAged 1 Female headed households 3 1 4 Arekit - 0 4 4 Demalo 2 10 12 I Duna 1 Emdibir 1 0 1 Gom a 1 0 1 Kebul 4 10 14 Lera 5 2 3 2 8 Mugo 7 0 7 ---Yeteragazer & 4 0 Yeteragazer 36 81 Total

6.3.3 Summary of Total Affected Assets The impacts identified and described in the preceding sections are summarized in Table 6.22 below. Detailed unit costs are found in Annex8.A and Annex8.B.

Table: 6.22 Summary of Total Affected Assets

Compensation --(Birr) Compensation for loss of dwellings number 772 15,801,189 Compensation for loss of institutional buildings Number 5 28,860 Residential fences meters 36,409 822,305 (mpensation for loss of farm lands I ~ectaresl 28.68 1 2,581,200 I Permanent loss Enset (False Banana )plant number 1 57,139 1 1,599,892 I I I I Permanent loss of Coffee trees number I 1,728 1 23,406 I I I I Permanent lose of Hope trees number I 712 1 142,400 I I I Permanent loss of Eucalyptus trees number 1 1,371,677 1 1,110,932 Permanent loss of indigenous trees number / 18,704 1 935,200 I I I Permanent loss of Fruit and other trees number I 4,147 1 289,750 1 I I I 1 Permanent loss of Trees (chat) number I 2,982 1 782,775 Relocation cost for Tele poles Lump sum 917,150 Relocation cost for Electric poles* Meters I I I I Water Supply pipes Meters I 488 1 107,360 1 Lump sum 300,000 I Lump sum 500,000

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 50 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Assistance to Vulnerable groups 500,000 Cemeteries Lum sum 232,600 I I I Sub-total 26,675,019 Contingency (10%) 2,667,502 Grand Total 29,342,521 * ( Under construction of changing the wood pole with concretes poles at the time field survey)

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineerr 51 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

7. COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK

7.1 General Approach Policies to compensate loss of land or property by the proposed Project are based on Ethiopian federal laws, regulations stipulated by Regional Authorities, and outlined in the World Bank Operational directiveslPolicies on involuntary resettlement OP4.12. The primary objective of the land acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is to restore the income and living standards of the affected persons within a short period of time after resettlement and as little disruptions as possible. Particular attention will be given to the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable groups. In this project, compensation valuation methods are based on similar projects implemented in the region and calculated according to 2008 replacement rates and values. Any further adjustments that may be necessary can be done in consultation with the resettlement committees that will be established prior to the commencement of the Project. The compensation approach adopted in this RAP is as per FDRE proclamation 45512005, Regulation No.13512007 and WB policy on involuntary resettlement (OP 4.1 2).

Compensation for land structures, business, fixed improvements and other temporary impacts are based on among other things on market valuation, productivity valuation, material and labour valuation, disposition of salvage materials and other fees paid. If relocation of business becomes necessary, access to customers and suppliers should be assured. In addition, workers losing employment in the process of relocating should be entitled to transitional income support. The compensation approach will be determined on the willingness and readiness of owners of a resource to give up theirsights.

Compensation for temporary impacts will. be calculated on the basis of the criterionlprinciples;

Compensation equivalent to lost income required for the duration of impact, Compensation equivalent to lost income required for loss of access, Physical restoration of assets (or access) required prior to return,

7.2 Principles of Compensation According to the legal and policy requirements of the Ethiopian Government and the World Bank, the principles of compensation and entitlements established for the project are as follows:

Compensation and entitlements provided to PAPS ensure that pre-Project standards of living are maintained or improved;

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 52 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Land temporarily occupied is kept to a minimum; PAPs, legal and illegal, are taken into consideration and accounted for; Per capita land holding after land acquisition is sufficient to maintain livelihood standards; Land allocation per capita is not sufficient to maintain livelihood, that other income generating activities are provided for; PAPs are adequately informed on eligibility, compensation rates and standards, livelihood and income restoration plans, and project timing; and Land acquisition will take place prior to satisfactory compensation and resettlement of the PAPs.

7.3 Eligible Parties Eligible parties for the purpose of this project are identified as Affected Persons (APs). This term refer to a collective unit of entitlement, and is used in this document to refer to families, other households, individuals and business and any other group affected by the project.

7.4 Compensation Eligibility All PAPs and organizations (whether public or private) who lose land, buildings/houses, crops or sources of income will be compensated or rehabilitated according to the types and amount of their losses (permanent and temporary).

7.4.1 Non-Eligible Affected persons and Cut-off date

Affected persons who move into the project area after the cut- off date will not be eligible for land acquisition compensation, though and such affected persons would be eligible for compensation caused by construction activities. The cut- off date for determining eligibility for compensation shall be at the time of undertaking the affected person's census that will take place after detailed design. This will be done at the same time as the officials detailed measurement surveylinventory of losses, which will be the basis for compensation, and at which time affected persons and local authorities or their representative on the survey teams will agree to detailed measurement survey1 inventory of losses for each affected persons, after detailed design. The purpose of the cut-off date is to minimize the incentive for land speculation, and minimize the incentive for the people to move into the project area in the hope of gaining compensation. However, it may be possible that some affected persons may have been missed in the census. Therefore, those who can demonstrate that they are eligible will also be included in the affected person census. The cut-off date for compensation was June 1712009. Cultivating land, constructing buildings or settlements in project affected areas after the cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation or subsidies. Compensation will also not be paid for any structures erected, or crops and trees planted purely for the purposes of gaining additional compensation.

APs eligible for compensation shall include the following: A. Land permanently acquired for the project

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 53 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Owners with formal legal titles Ownersloccupiers, who are eligible for formal legal title under Ethiopian law APs with other recognized land use right Occupiers who are not eligible for legal titles B. Permanent loss of house, other structure and improvement, and land based assets such as trees Owners of houses and other structures (whether with land title or not) C. Temporary effects such as disturbance to crops during construction FarmerILand userslowners of infrastructure within the ROW D. For effects on Business Owners of Business Employees who have lost income as a result of the project

Types of APs and their proposed eligibility for compensation are detailed in the Entitlement Matrix.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 54 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Table 7.1: ENTITLEMENT MATRIX OF COMPENSATION Category MATRIX OF COMPENSATION of PAPs

compensation for compensation for Compensation Compensation Moving Other Type of Loss lossess of structures lossess Lands for Assets for loss of Allowance Assistances income

Compensated in Values of crops 10% for land or cash to lose equal to the inconvenienc PAPS at a rate number of years e equivalent for 10 lost till APs get Loss of land - times the Average - the land - Annual Output

Property Owners Loss of Residential land. Fully compensated Fully For loss rental Transport 10% for Structure houses, buildings and at replacement compensated at income lump cost inconvenienc Residential or other fixture losses cost replacement sum cash e business directly and fully cost payments of 6 compensated at months rent per replacement cost free tenants of demolition expenses and salvaged materials

Residential Loss of No Replacement 3 months rent Transport 10% for Tenants residential cost for non (Equivalent cost inconvenienc accommodation removable if Return ) e installation was agreed with owner

Business Loss of premises No Replacement For loss of Transport Tenants cost for facilities business income cost that can not be payment will be moved made

Land Loss of land No NO compensation Tenants law regarding land tenants in Ethiopia . thus compensated should be paid as - - - - per the OP4.12

- - - Squatters Loss of shelter Residential land, None Subsistence Transport 10% for (living on houses, buildings and allowance on Allowance inconvenienc site) other fixture losses will daily bases for e be directly and fully the number of compensated at days the building replacement cost free complete of demolition expenses and salvaged materials

Vulnerable Residential land. Compensated in Fully Compensation Transport 10% for Groups houses, buildings and land or cash to compensated at for equivalent Allowance inconvenienc other fixture losses PAPS at a rate replacement loss of income e directly and fully equivalent for 10 cost and special compensated at times the Average assistance replacement cost free Annual Output and based on of demolition expenses special assistance identified needs and salvaged materials based on identified and priorities. and special assistance needs and based on identified priorities. needs and priorities.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 55 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

7.5 Valuation Method for Affected Assets The following section describes the valuation methods to be used for this compensation estimate and RAP report. Detailed compensation unit rates to be used for each affected assets based on standard regulations and estimates are provided in Chapter 6.

Basis for Valuation The basis for the valuation of affected assets and properties is Gross Current Replacement Cost (GCRC). ERA's RPF defines Gross Current Replacement Cost as "the estimated cost of erecting a building as new having the same gross external area as that existing with the site works and services on a similar piece of land". The valuation process will also consider the use of "compensation value" for affected properties.

In addition to GCRC, "Compensation value" is also taken into consideration. According to the ERA's RPF, "Compensation Value" is defined as the amount to be paid to the leaseholder calculated as an amount which is above the gross current replacement cost, including the costs for the inconvenience caused to the leaseholders by relocation, and to enable the same leaseholders to build slightly better houses than what they currently occupy.

FDRE's Proclamation 45512005, in Part Three, article 9 (valuation of property), no.1 states that "The valuation of property situated on land to be expropriated shall be carried out by certified private or public institutions or individual consultants on the basis of valuation formula adopted at the national level".

7.5.1 ValuationlCompensation for Permanently Loss of Cultivated Land Depending on the availability of land, permanently cultivated land lost to the project will be compensated on a land-for-land basis. However, if there is shortage of land, crop loss will be compensated in cash to PAPS at a rate equivalent for 10 times the Average Annual Output Value ( AAOV). Monetary compensation is paid for loss of crops and trees found on permanently and temporarily lost agricultural land and which is acquired for the construction of the project road. The compensation rateslvalue for loss of trees and crops from lost agricultural land are established by the woreda agriculture and rural development offices.

FDRE Proclamation 45512005, Article 8 (displacement Compensation) No. 1; "A rural landholder whose landholding has been permanently expropriated shall, in addition to the compensation payable under article 7 of this proclamation, be paid displacement compensation which shall be equivalent to ten times the average annual income he secured during the five years preceding the expropriation of the land"

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pic in JV Core Consulting Engineers 56 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

The principle of compensation also follows that of income restoration of PAPS. According to the five year average crop budget and gross income is calculated and the proportion of income equivalent to land loss is determined.

Similarly, FDRE Council of Ministers Regulation No.13512007, in Part Three, Article 16, No. 3 (a, b & c) state that:

The average annual yield of crops or perennial crops shall be calculated on the basis of:

a) the yield obtained from the land for the last five years: or b) where the land was used for less than five years, the yield obtained for the actual years the land was used; or c) where the crops or perennial crops have not yet started giving annual yield, the yield of similar crops or perennial crops obtained for a similar area of land in the locality for the last five years.

The basis for the valuation of compensation is based on the different types of crops grown in the area and according to its current market prices. Therefore, in order to estimate compensation for the loss of crops, the valuation for compensation is calculated for those crops that are commonly planted and grow in the project area.

Compensation for Crops: The total area of the land (m2) x Value of the crops per kg x the amount of crops to be obtained in m2 + Cost of permanent improvement on land

Compensation for unripe perennial crops: Number of plants x Cost incurred to grow an individual plant + Cost of permanent improvement on land

Compensation for ripe perennial crops: The annual yield of the perennial crop (in kg) x the current price of the produces + Cost of permanent improvement on land

According to the FDRE proclamation the amount of displacement compensation will be ten times of the average yield of crops or perennial crops obtained from the land.

Details for compensation and current market price of each asset are presented section 6.3.2.3.

7.5.2 ValuationlCompensation for Temporary Dispossession of Rural Land Temporary loss of cultivated land will be directly compensated in cash at a rate equivalent of AAOV for the number of years that the land is not available for cultivation. Details for compensation and current market price of each asset are presented in section 6.3.2.3.

Rural land needed temporarily for detour roads or for other use in connection with the construction works, including borrow pits, quarries and access roads to such areas, will

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 57 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

be restored by the contractor to its original state after the temporary use for the construction work is over.

The compensation for temporary disposed land according to Proclamation 45512005, Article 8, No.2 is states as ; "A rural landholder or holders of common land whose landholding has been provisionally expropriated shall, in addition to the compensation payable under Article 7 of this proclamation, be paid until repossession of the land, compensation for lost income based on the average annual income secured during the five years preceding the expropriation of the land; provided, however, that such payment shall not exceed the amount of compensation payable under sub article (1) of this article."

Similarly, Council of Minister Regulation No. 13512007, Article No.18 states that "Where rural land is expropriated only for a limited period of time, the multiplication factor for calculating the displacement compensation shall be the number of years for which the land is cleared; provided, however, that the compensation obtained by such calculation shall not exceed the amount payable under article 16 or 17."

In addition to the compensation for lost crop on temporarily disposed land, the cost for permanent improvement of land shall be computed by considering the costs incurred for clearing, leveling, terracing, and other agricultural infrastructure works.

7.5.3 ValuationlCompensation for Grazing Land

There are usually two types of grazing land systems in Ethiopia, known as protected and unprotected or communal and private. Among the two types of grazing land, the unprotected communal grazing land is very common.

As per the Council of Ministers Regulation No. 13512007, the compensation for the protected grass land is calculated as follows;

Area covered by the grass m2 x the current market price of the grass per m2

Regarding the communal grazing land, experience shows that there has never been any compensation for grazing land since the ownership of land belongs to Government and the public.

7.5.4 ValuationlCompensation for Trees

Eucalyptus is the predominant species of trees that is widely grown in the project area. Eucalyptus yields and prices are based on age, height and diameter of trees, and their functions (e.g. house construction, electricity poles, fuel wood etc). Based on this eucalyptus trees are classified into three major classes: 1. Small (at seedling ) 2. Medium 3. Large (Pole).

Melaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 58 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

'The Council Ministers Regulation, Article 7 (1&2) states that "The amount of compensation for trees shall be determined on the basis of the level of growth of the tree

and the current local price per square meter or per unit. "

7.5.5 ValuationlCompensation for Residential Land, Houses, and Fixtures Residential land, houses, buildings and other fixture losses will be directly and fully compensated at replacement cost free of demolition expenses and salvaged materials. Compensation for residential land will be paid to the responsible unit that will, in consultation with the village committee, make available replacement plots within the community. If this is not feasible, the responsibility will be assumed by local government. Houses, out-buildings, apartments and related fixtures will be compensated in cash at replacement cost paid directly to the PAPs. Renters of affected houses/buildings will be guaranteed of a rent contract at the same rental terms for negotiated number of years. According to ERA'S Resettlement /Rehabilitation Policy Frame Work the basis for the valuation of houses is the Gross Current Replacement Cost (GCRC). This is defined as the estimated cost of erecting a house as new having the same total external area as that existing with the site works and services on a similar piece of land.

Compensation value for houses is estimated on the basis of the type of the affected houses. The cost for each house that would be replaced is estimated on the basis of specification and bill of quantities prepared by the municipalities of each town and verified with PAPs.

Households who might lose their houses due to the construction of the project road will receive full replacement cost plus disturbance allowance. The disturbance allowance is considered to cover the loss of established businesses, and include social disruptions and inconveniencies. With this disturbance allowance, the affected people can cover expenses associated with their relocation including access to social and public services.

Compensation for houses, fences and other structures affected by the project as described above shall take place at full replacement cost.

Methodology for determining replacement cost of building structures: The following methodology is used in determining replacement cost for building structures as per Council of Ministers Regulation No. 13512007,

= Cost of construction (current value) + Cost of permanent improvement of land + The amount refundable money for the remaining term of lease contract

7.5.6 Compensation for Public utilities

The relocation of utility lines is normally carried out by the service providers upon payment of relocation cost and needs to be completed prior to commencement of the

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 59 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

works, in order to avoid delaying the contractor. ERA will be responsible to notify the appropriate regional and woreda authorities of the relevant dates, and request completion of relocation works before the commencement of the construction works. The owner of the utility line shall relocate the utility lines within 30 days of from the date of receipt of the compensation payment.

In this project a compensation for the poles is paid based on the owners estimate for relocation cost only requested by the consultants. A compensation for water pipes are based on the unit rate collected from water supply authority in A.A. Thus a valuation method of 220 birr per a meter for a pipe of 3/4 inch is taken. This includes 120 for a meter pipe, 70 for fittings and 30 birr labor. A total of 488 meters of pipe are affected incurring cost of 107,360.

7.5.7 lncome restoration lncome restoration refers to reestablishment of income levels for the PAPs prevalent at the time of displacement. lncome restoration is an important component for the resettlement of PAPs who have lost their productive base, businesses, jobs, or other income sources, regardless of whether they have also lost their houses.

In income restoration, issues such as, source of livelihood (monetary and non monetary), availability of land for replacement, existing skills of PAPs, employment opportunities and income restoration options will be provided.

For PAPs who have lost their assets, income restoration plans or programmes may require support and services in the long and short term basis.

The short term support plans may include compensation payment made for lost assets and properties before relocation, allowances for transportation and moving agricultural extension and other related supports until the income level of PAPs is restored. This short term support also involves provision of employment opportunities at project construction site.

Long-term income restoration involves land and non-land-based economic activities that will provide a sustained source of income over a longer period of time and to enable income restoration, or better still, improvements in PAPs standard of living.

7.5.8 Replacement Cost Replacement cost is based on the premise that the costs of replacing productive assets that have been damaged because of upgrading the project road activities or improper on- site management can be measured. These costs are taken as a minimum estimate of the value of measures that will reduce the damage or improve on-site management practices and thereby prevent damage.

Replacement cost is the method of valuation of property and determine the amount of replacement through compensation. ERA'S Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy Framework defines replacement cost approach as; "...direct replacement of expropriated

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 60 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

assets and covers an amount that is sufficient for asset replacement, net depreciation, moving expenses and other transaction costs".

Similarly, World Bank's OP 4.12 defines replacement cost as follows; "method of valuation of assets that helps determine the amount sufficient to replace lost assets and cover transition costs. In applying this method of valuation, depreciation of structures and assets should not be taken into account".

In Places where markets are not well organized or thin, replacement of assets may be scarce, or loss of human or social capital might also be debilitating there is a need to establish supplemental income strategies.

The replacement cost approach also involves;

direct replacement of expropriated assets and covers an amount that is sufficient for asset replacement, net depreciation, moving expenses and other transaction costs.

With regard to land and structures, replacement cost is defined as shown in Table 7.2 for the different land use type, such as, agriculture, urban and rural land.

Table 7.2 : Replacement Costs for Agricultural Land and Structures Agricultural Land For public Infrastructure For houses It is the pre-project or pre- It is the pre-project or pre- It is the market cost of the displacement, whichever is displacement, whichever materials to build a higher is higher with similar or replacement structure improved public (house) with an area and infrastructure facilities and quality similar to or better services and located in the than the affected house, or vicinity of the affected area to repair a partially affected house Market value of land of equal The cost of any The cost of transporting productive potential or use registration and transfer building materials to the located in the vicinity of the taxes construction site affected land The cost of land preparation to The cost of transporting The cost of any labour and levels similar to those of the building materials to the contractors' fees affected land construction site The cost of any registration and The cost of any labour and The cost of any registration 1 transfer taxes I contractors' fees I and transfer taxes

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 6 1 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

8. DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Ethiopian Roads Authority (ERA) has been vested with the overall responsibility for the coordination, planning and implementation of land acquisition and resettlement activities under the Project. The actual implementation of land acquisition and resettlement work will be carried out also by ERA.

Fiaure 1 Schematic Presentation of Resettlement Committee

ERA

I I I I 7 SECTOR OFFICES \ WEREDA / PROJECT AFFECTED ' REPRESENTATIVE & Elders \ 1 \ 1 \ 1 I r 3 - KEBELE

L J

COMMITTEE

8.1 Woreda and Municipality Level Compensation and Relocation Committee The Compensation and Relocation Committee would be responsible for the planning, coordinating and monitoring of compensation and relocation activities. This committee would be responsible for: Establishing kebele level implementation committees Clarifying policies and operational guidelines of kebele compensation committees Coordinating and supervising implementation by kebele compensation committees as stipulated in federal and regional guidelines Ensuring that appropriate compensation procedures are followed Overseeing Project's requirements related to the social environment The following organizational framework would apply:

8.2 Woreda Compensation (and Resettlement) Committee Woreda Administrator (Chairperson)

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 62 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Woreda Rural Development and Agriculture Woreda Environment Protection and Land Use Administration Woreda Rural Road Desk Representative from local NGO or CBO Representative of PAPs Representative of elders

Organizations Roles and responsibilities I No I 1 Ethiopian Roads Authority ERA manages , coordination (planning and implementation process); Budget allocation for project; Monitoring and Evaluation 2 Environmental Protection Ensure that the Social and Environmental Policies Authority (EPA) and guidelines are followed up 3 Regional Government Provide Political and Administrative support for the States implementation of the project 4 Zonal Administrations Coordinate the different Woredas affected by the project; coordination of restoration methods for PAPs. 5 Woreda Administrations Responsible for the implementation of the project activities, establish compensation committees at kebele level, ensure that PAPs are compensated as per the federal and regional guidelines. 6 Woreda Agricultural Office Establish unit rate for crops and different types of trees. 7 Municipalities Responsible for the implementation of Project activities in town sections; establish compensation committees at urban kebele level; ensure that PAPs are compensated as per federal and regional

Allocate land for the affected families; Establish Kebele Administration kebele level compensation committee; Coordinate 8 (Rural and Urban) day to day activities of the compensation committee; I I Assist vulnerable PAPS

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 63 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROVISIONS FOR REDRESS AND GRIEVANCES In order to ensure that PAP grievances and complaints on any aspect of the land acquisition, compensation, and resettlement are addressed in a timely and satisfactory manner, and that all possible avenues are available to PAPs to put forward their grievances, a well defined grievance redress mechanism will be established by the Project.

9.1 Grievance Redress In the initial instance, grievances will be dealt with the Compensation and Relocation Committees. These committees comprise of:

Local Authority Resettlement Sub-committees Representative of Land Use and Land Administration Authority ERA Representative Local leaders in affected villagesllocal areas . Representatives of PAPs Local NGOs and CBOs.

9.2 Grievance Redress Mechanism Where disputes arise between principal parties and PAPs, the initially preferred means of settling grievances is by arbitration as per Ethiopian law (Article 3325 - 3336) of the civil code. Grievances will be initially addressed at the level of the Local Compensation and Implementing Committee. If an agreement not be reached at this level, the complaint may be taken to the Local Authority level Compensation Committee. If the complaint is not resolved at this level, the aggrieved party has the right to appeal to a court of law.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 64 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

10. COMPENSATION IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE A schedule for implementation of resettlement and compensation activities is included in Table 21. The schedule is related to the implementation schedule for the Project. All compensation and resettlement for each component of the Project must be completed satisfactorily, income restoration measures in place and the construction area free of all impediment before commencement of civil works for that component. The main objective in implementing this schedule is to ensure that compensation for land acquisition and lost assets is disbursed in time to enable affected households to construct dwellings and to restore livelihoods, and for affected public services to be fully reinstated prior to the commencement of the Project.

10.1 Ccompensation delivery mechanisms -The implementation of resettlement and compensation activities should follow series of activities. 'The following are activities of compensation delivery mechanisms before commencement of construction to ensure the participation and consultation of PAPs, namely:

The establishment of Compensation and Relocation committees; The establishment of Grievance committees Confirmation of project effects based on detail engineering survey, design and construction plan Carry out final survey and prepare revise inventory of PAPs. Declaration of cut- of- date for inventory PAPs. Carry out further community consultation on revised inventory of PAPs Dissemination of relocation information and details of land acquisition activities Negotiation between PAPs and the Compensation and Relocation representatives regarding acquisition and the type and measurement of structures and land parcels; Holding village meetings to decide upon the location of new house sites, Notify PAPs of the project, effects and compensation and other entitlement and grievance measures. Compensation arrangements and income restoration measures Compensation rates are worked our based on the current market values Compensation rates will be sent to PAPs If there is an appeal then negotiation shall be carried out. Finally the compensation amount will be sent to the PAPs through Bank account of the PAPs individually. 'The timing of these activities is designed to allow the executing agency time to respond to practical and useful suggestions made by PAPs and to respond to, and resolve, grievances.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 65 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

Table 10.1 COMPENSATION AND LAND ACQUSATION PLAN Months TASK - 12 34 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 Project processing

pp-p--- J Project appraisal - Project approval

Land acquisition and resettlement: Preparation

Establish Resettlement committee Mark Right of Way - Conduct Detailed measurement survey Fix compensation rate and options through the - committee meeting Finalize the resettlement 1 relocation of the study . rlnrt ~mnnt Land acquisition and resettlement: Implementation Pay compensation fees to land holding groups and APs - Construction new houses I Land Redistribution I Income restoration I Training

Consultation

Monitoring

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 66 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

11. FRAMEWORK FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION

11.1 Internal Monitoring It is the responsibility of the proponent to conduct regular internal monitoring of the resettlement performance of the operation. The monitoring should be a systematic evaluation of the activities of the operation in relation to the specified criteria of the condition of approval. The responsible ERA branch ( EMSB & ROW ) will be responsible for implementing resettlement and compensation activities for the Project and it will therefore be their responsibility to undertake regular internal monitoring of the process. The objective of internal monitoring and supervision will be: To verify that the valuation of assets lost or damaged, and the provision of compensation, resettlement and other rehabilitation entitlements, has been carried out in accordance with the resettlement policies provided by the Ethiopian Government and the World Bank; To oversee that the RAP is implemented as designed and approved; To verify that funds for implementation of the RAP are provided by the Project authorities in a timely manner and in amounts sufficient for their purposes, and that such funds are used in accordance with the provisions of the RAP.

11.2 Internal monitoring indicators The main indicators that will be monitored regularly: Payment of compensation to the PAPs in the various categories is made in accordance with the level of compensation described in the RAP Public information and public consultation and grievance procedures are followed as described in the RAP Relocation and payment of subsistence and shifting allowances are made in a timely manner Restoration of affected public facilities and infrastructure are completed prior to construction

11.3 External Monitoring and Evaluation The Consultant recommends that an independent monitoring unit (IMU) be established to evaluate implementation of compensation and resettlement. The IMU shall be appointed to monitor the resettlement and compensation process and implementation of requirements to verify that compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation have been implemented in accordance with the agreed RAP. The IMU will also be involved in the complaints and grievance procedures to ensure concerns raised by PAPs are addressed. More specifically, the IMU will carry out the following:

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 67 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Review the results of the internal monitoring and review overall compliance with the RAP Assess whether relocation objectives have been met especially with regard to housing, living standards, compensation levels, etc. Assess general efficiency of relocation and formulate lessons for future guidance Determine overall adequacy of entitlements to meet the objectives. The Consultant recommends that ERA establishes an IMU that draws on personnel with resettlement and social development experience. The Consultant further recommends that relevant representatives be included in this unit. Project Affected Persons should be represented through relevant NGOs. The objective of this unit will also be to provide a forum for skills-sharing and to develop institutional capacity. It is important that the Unit is able to maintain a strong independent position and provide constructive feedback to the project to ensure the objectives are met. The resettlement action plan will be monitored, apprised and evaluated by The World Bank apart from the monitoring and evaluation to be done by the independent monitoring unit.

11.3.1 Outcome Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation Outcome indicators include the delivery of compensation and other mitigation to avoid economic and physical displacement caused by the Project. A key objective of the RAP is that resettlement actions and mitigation measures should lead to sustainable restoration or enhancement of affected people's pre-project living standards and income levels. Outcome indicators measure whether compensation is paid and received, whether the affected populations were able to use compensation payment for investments that would give them sustained income. Outcome indicators will include: Restoration of agricultural production and overall income levels Successfully negotiated land agreements Satisfaction with reinstatement activities Changes in community attitude towards the project Types of compensation payments for income generating investments

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 68 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

12. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

12.1 Conclusion Based on the findings of this social impact analysis, the construction and operation of the Wolkite - Hossiana Road will have several beneficial as well as adverse impacts on social and natural environment within the area of influence of the road. The construction of the proposed road will not cause significant socio-environmental effects that cannot be minimized with normal good engineering practices and with integrating the proposed environmental and social mitigation measures in the planning and execution of the project. Most of the social impacts are moderate and will be reversible with community consultation and involvement and designing considering the needs of the community as appropriate and possible. Impacts like loss of fertile farmland, housing, plantation will be permanent impacts. Temporary impacts stem from ground disturbance for the road construction and for obtaining construction materials, as well as operation of construction equipment and camps or housing of the labor force. These temporal impacts can be reduced to acceptable levels with good engineering practices and integration of restoration and other mitigation measures in the planning and implementation of the project. The construction of the proposed road (except the loss of farmland and housing) will not cause such environmental effects that cannot be minimized with normal good engineering practices and with integrating some environmental and social mitigation measures in the planning and execution of the project.

12.2 Recommendations a ) Environmental Aspects To have minimal and acceptable residual environmental impacts, it is recommended that the proposed mitigation measures be properly implemented by including them in the Tender Document for the Contractor and through an Environmental Management Plan. A close follow up of the effectiveness of the implemented measures through a well- planned monitoring program is also critically important. Among the issues that should be given maximum attention are:

ERA should appoint environmental supervisor or equivalent to supervise environmental monitoring and management activities of the road, and to ensure that contractors utilize methods that protects the environment. It will be important also to include environmental requirements in contract specifications so that adequate budget will be allocated Implementation of erosion control measures by designing and constructing appropriate physicallengineering structures, and by implementing biological (re-vegetation) measures, as well as by instituting follow up procedures to repair defects. Impacts on water supply sources of the local communities and their livestock must be kept to a minimum. Restricting land acquisition to what is absolutely necessary to reduce loss of land and roadside vegetation.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pt in JV Core Consulting Engineers 69 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Proper locating of construction camps and management of workforce, and restoration of the sites to blend with the surrounding environment as soon as the construction work is completed. Proper management of construction machinery and control of traffic.

b) Socio-Economic Aspects The positive impact of the project will be felt at both the construction and operation stages. During construction, the benefits will be mainly related to business activities and employment opportunity. By this it is considered that persons who reside in towns and villages along the road will profit from business activities created by the contractor. Employment opportunities will probably be restricted to the hiring of unskilled laborers who will be actively involved in the construction processes and thereby gain income and knowledge. Investment activities as well as export and import will be improved as a result of improved access. On the other hand, with regard to adverse consequences of the project, the most important impact on socio-economic life is the loss of property; in particular the loss of farmland, housing units and business centers. However, these will be mitigated by the payment of suitable compensation. Based on the socio-cultural assessment, the following recommendation should be implemented to ensure the sustainability of the road project: Project area communities should be actively encouraged to participate in the construction and implementation of the project. This participation should start from provision of necessary data and information pertaining to the project activities. Such participation should take account of the contributions that can be made by women at every level. Project area communities and stakeholders should be consulted from time to time, particularly before and during the construction period, to find appropriate mitigation measures or adverse impacts, and to solve them accordingly. Before the start of construction, detailed inventory of affected property andlor households should be compiled. The involvement of stakeholders is essential. The local administration, namely Woreda administration and Kebele administration will be very helpful in facilitating the project activities through solving problems related to land acquisition, settlement of disputes and security. The schedule of construction needs should be communicated to the concerned bodies at the earliest possible opportunity, to allow affected households time to prepare themselves physically and mentally to participate and co-operate with the project activities.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 70 Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlemenf Action Plan Report

References:

Ethiopia: Sustainable Development and Poverty Reduction Program (2002) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) and Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MOFED), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

ERA, 2002, ResettlementlRehabilitation policy framework

Federal Negarit Gazeta of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. (2000) A Proclamation to Provide for Research and Conservation of Cultural Heritage (Proclamation No. 20912000) No. 39 Addis Ababa 27JUI~ 2008 Federal Negarit Gazeta of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. (2005) A Proclamation on Expropriation of Landholdings for Public Purposes and Payment of th Compensation ( Proclamation, No. 4551205) N0.43 Addis Ababa 15 July 2005

World Bank Environmental Department (1999). Public Consultation in the Environmental Assessment Process. Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update, No 26. May

World Bank, (2002) Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan (IFC Environment and Social Development Department) 24674 April

Statistical Report (2004) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 0

Annex 1.

List of Contacted Persons

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

ANNEX 1. LIST OF CONTACTED PERSONS

1 Name I Woredal Town I Position 1.Mulat Worku Limo IHossiana Wored Admnistration office Head ------2. Shambel Dejene Mokenen Limo IHossiana Wored General Service Head 3.Shimeles Shibeshi Limo IHossiana Municipality Vl G- 4.Ayele Gobena Limo IHossiana Towns Road Coordination office head 5.Bilala Dari 1 Azernet ILera Woreda Adminstrator 6.Abdela Rahimeto ' Azernet ILera Woreda Adminstration office Head

P 7.Nadew Wumbe Azernet IMugo iChairperson 18mFdNeri I Gumerl Arekit 1 Woreda Adminstrator 1 9.Dila Worku Gumerl Arekit

P 10.Sadik Mohammed Chahal Endibir Woreda Adminstrator 1 1 1 .Tagesu Nima Chahal Endibir Woreda council member 1 12. Ketema Haile I Chahal Endibir ( Woreda council member 1 I I 13.Degemu garuma I Chahal Endibir ( Woreda council member I I 14.Abdirezak Seid ( Chahal Endibir I Woreda council member

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers

ANNEX 2.-

List of Community Participated on Consultation

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

ANNEX 2. LIST OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATED ON CONSULTATION

Name Location 1.Beshir Muzein Azernet Woreda, Demeas debabis Kebele, Homa Village 2.Mahmud Hamza Same above I 3.Amdiso Osman I Same above 1 1 4. Negash- Muzien 1 Same above 1 1 5. Hussien Bulti ( Same above I 6. Sergota Sebado 1 Same above 7. Mekt Hakil ) Same above r I 1 8. Fetih Sheh Hassen I Same above I 9. Juhar Shifa Limo Wereda, Shurmo kebele(Rura1Town) 10. Eshetu Hairedin Limo Wereda, Shurmo kebele(Rura1Town) 11. Beyer Sepiso Limo Wereda, Shurmo kebele(Rura1Town) 12.Erebo Hegeno Limo Wereda, Shurmo kebele(Rura1Town) 13.Girma Busero I Limo Wereda, Shurmo kebele(Rura1Town) 14. Haji Ahmed Awel Lera Town

I 15. Kemal Olsero Lera Town I 16. Hajl Kamil Sheh Awel Lera Town rI I I I 17.Kedir Hussein 1 Lera Town 18.Nesro Ahmedin Lera Town 1 19.Emam Mohammed Muzein Lera Town 20.Haji Mohamud Sheh Ali Lera Town 1 2 1.Haji Beshir Hassen Lera Town 1 1 22.Abduselah Salia Lera Town / 23.Haji Yimam Senkom Sheh Lera Town Shalo 24. Hadra Sultan Chaha Wereda, Yefit Terek Wedero Kebele

1 26.Muligeta Nida 1 Same as above 1 I 27. Fikadu Y irga Same as above bDinoNur Same as above 29.Biro Nesro Same as above

I 30.brahim Yibete Same as above 31 .Denika Yassin Same as above 32.Hadra Mudesir Same as above 1 33.Nesru Reshad Same as above ( 34.Tariku Berede 1 Same as above -1

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repolt

Name Location

I 35.Murad Tolo Same as above 36.Teka Shewiye 37.Getu Tolo Same as above List of Community representative at Cemetery site 38. Taha Shafi Mugo Kebele ( Kebele Chair person) 39. Kedir Wabela Mugo Kebele (Village representative) 40. Mahbub Mudesir Mugo Kebele (Keble Administrator) 41. She Hassen Yasin Mugo Kebele ( Religious Representative) 41. Zefemo Zage Mugo Kebele (Kebele Representative) 42.Hashim Nasir Mugo (Imam, Religious Leader) 43.Miewer Nasir Mugo Kebele (School Director) 44.Rahmeto Wabela Mugo Kebele (Teacher) 45.Sirgaga Rashid Mugo Kebele (Elder)

- - Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 2

ANNEX 3.

House and Fence categories

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repolt

ANNEX 3. House and Fence categories

HOUSES

HCBIStone wall, Grade-lA, having a ceiling and the walls plastered and painted and also standard foundation.

Mud house, Grade-16, having masonry foundation and the front wall cladding with stone.

IMud House, Grade-1C, having masonry foundation and the walls made from mud.

Mud House, Grade-1 D, having earthenlmud floor

Tukul, Grade- 1E, having a diameter grater than 8m

Tukul, Grade-1 F, having a diameter less than 6m

Sheet metal house, Grade-1G, having a masonry foundation.

FENCES

HCBISTONE fence CIS fence Wire fence Wooden fence

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 1

ANNEX 4.

House and Fence Categories and Unit Cost

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

ANNEX 4: HOUSE AND FENCE CATAGORIES AND UNIT COST A)Kebena Woreda ( 0+000 - 9+700 )

6)Cheha Woreda ( 9+700 - 75+000 ) -by Endibir town administration

with masonry foundation and the

Wire fence C2C 182 Wooden fence C2D 47

Note: The obstructions in the Gumer woreda(45+000 - 75+000) are estimated based on the neighboring Cheha woreda is unable to give the data on time

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 1

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

C)Lemo Woreda ( 75+000 - 121+000 ) -by Hosaina town administration

Estimated Type of cost for Remark on cost Obstruction Plot Id sq.m Remark on obstruction estimate Avg. of 1&2 of the HCBIStone house with wall plastered and Hosaina town G-I HIA 3400 painted and having ceiling administration

with masonry foundation Avg of 3&40f the and the front wall claded Hosaina town Mud house .G-2 HIB 2200 with stone administration Mud house .G-3 HIC 1200 with masonry foundation Mud house .G-4 HID 900 with earthlmud floor Tukul G-I HIE 780.2 with Dia. Greater than 8 from Cheha(B) ,C1E Tukul G-2 HIF 630 with Dia. Less than 6 from Cheha(B) ,C1F not given by the woreda referred from Cheha Sheet metal shops HIG 760 Woreda from Cheha(B) ,ClG converted to Im by Avg of 2a &2b of the assuming avg height of wall Hosaina town HCBIStone fence H2A 167.5 2m. administration converted to Im by assuming avg height of wall CIS fence H2B 50 2m. Wire fence H2C 60 Wooden fence H2D

Note : The obstructions in the Azernet Berbere woreda(75+000 -110+000) are estimated based on the neighboring Lemo wereda since the wereda is unable to give the data on time.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

A Houses

HCBIStone wall, having a ceiling and the walls plastered and painted and also standard foundation

HCBIStone wall, having a ceiling and the walls plastered and painted and also standard foundation Mud Houses

Mud House, having masonry foundation and the walls made from mud

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 3

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Mud house, having masonry foundation and the walls made from mud

Tukul Houses

Tukul house having a diameter grater than 8m

Tukul houses having a diameter less than 6m

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 4

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Sheet metal houses having a masonry foundation

Fences with stone

Fences with corrugated iron sheets

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 5

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Fences with wire

Fences with wood

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 6

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Letter of Local Administration Confirming Cooperation during the project Implementation

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 7

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Letter of Local Administration Confirming Cooperation during the project Implementation

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 8

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Letter of Local Administration Confirming Cooperation during the project Implementation ... ?... .\. *__'... -'

'".'..... ,.,;,,.. ,',', . : , ~.... 2,,,, . ,,,- ...... r.; :. ; . . ... " , :<4, > " i...' :i .-..:< <,,.*...... , . . .: < et ...... -..i...t. i, . .A_. I' ,.. 1 I ,. ., , . , ,., . .. . '$ ,. ., . ,.. , . ~ : . .

Telephone Pole Relocation Cost Estimate

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 9

Welkjte Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 10

ANNEX 5

Survey Questionnaires

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repod

Annex 5 Survey Questionnaires 5.1 Questionnaires For house 3/4~*]Au?,,(" Y}T "

3/.u?}cw w3f Family Size -A' Type of House u?f / Homestead S}CA]A YA / Occupation and Age of the Househead -- 0 }.I. %,v"A.'

I I Y4u?- -A'f(tt~)I Type of House '/4)0' -A'f (tt~)1 Tvpe of Fence SICAIA YA (eil I Occupation 1. %q'qa u?f u~"0AICIS with stone 1. %ix )0'I Fence with barbed iron 1 . u0w' " IFarmer 2. 3/4qTqau? f WKd'e-A'f [~EI/Affected partly or totally 3/,s'oU="< eU------1. UYOM Ipartly Enumerator Name------2. uS

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 1

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

5.2 Questionnaires For agricultural assets 3/,~-]Au?,,cN PIT "

"ICPIT- kuK2 ...... Woreda Town Kebele

%u?}cw w3f Family -- Ucf %ua- A, Size and Age of the u?f / Homestead s}c.~]A YA / Occupation %"

P - - '/4~?- -A'f (CE) l TVD~of House 3/4)0' -A'f (CE) / Tvpe of Fence S)CA]A YA (CE) / Occupation 1 . 3/4q'qa U?f UE"OA ICIS with stone 1. %ix )0' IFence with barbed iron 1 . UOW' IFarmer 2. %q'qa U?f WKd'e-A'f (CEI /Affected partlv or totally 3/,S'Ou="< eU ------1. UYOMI partly Enumerator Name 2. uS

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 2

ANNEX 6

Minutes of Meetings

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Repori

Annex 6 Minutes of meeting 1. Wereda: Mirab Azernet Berenere

Confirmation of Cooperation by the community during the Project Participants: Ato Abdela Rahimeto Woreda Adminstration office Head Ato Nadew Wumbe Kebele Chairperson Abdulahi Mohammed Consultant

Agenda: 1. Project impacts 2. Experience of the woreda regarding compensation on involuntary displacement 3. Woreda norms on compensation of assets 4. The capacity of the woreda to assist displacement

Minutes of Meeting: 1. Regarding the impact of the Project, the woreda believes that the positive impact is higher than the negative impacts; 2. The woreda confirms that any impact on the farm land the woreda will cooperate to provide the necessary assistance. The woreda will establish a compensation committee that will consist of Project- affected people; 3. The woreda will work out compensation rates with the committee according to the procedure accepted by the committee and law. 4. The woreda administration believes that there will not be any resettlement due to the Project, but will assist any impact on farm land damage and eucalyptus trees.

2. Wereda: Limo1 Hossiana Participants: 1. Ato IVlulat Worku Woreda Admnistration office Head 2. Shambel Dejene Mokenen Woreda General Service Head 3. Ato Shimeles Shibeshi Municipality VI GM 4. Ato Ayele Gobena Road Coordination office head 5.Abdulahi Mohammed Consultant

Agenda: 1. Project impacts 2. Experience of the woreda regarding compensation on involuntary displacement

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

3. Woreda norms on compensation of assets 4. The capacity of the woreda to assist displacement

Minutes of Meeting: 1. Regarding the impact of the Project, the woreda believes that the positive impact is higher than the negative impacts; 2. The woreda confirms that any impact on the farm land the woreda will cooperate to provide the necessary assistance. The woreda will establish a compensation committee that will consist of Project- affected people; 3. The woreda will work out compensation rates with the committee according to the procedure accepted by the committee and law. 4. The woreda administration believes that there will not be any resettlement due to the Project, but will assist any impact on farm land damage and eucalyptus trees.

3. Wereda: Gummer Arekit Participants: Ato Ahmed Neri Woreda Adminstrator Ato Dila Worku Woreda council member Abdulahi Mohammed Consultatnt

Agenda: 1. Project impacts 2. Experience of the woreda regarding compensation on involuntary displacement 3. Woreda norms on compensation of assets 4. The capacity of the woreda to assist displacement

Minutes of Meeting: 1. Regarding the impact of the Project, the woreda believes that the positive impact is higher than the negative impacts; 2. The woreda confirms that any impact on the farm land the woreda will cooperate to provide the necessary assistance. The woreda will establish a compensation committee that will consist of Project-affected people; 3. The woreda will work out compensation rates with the committee according to the procedure accepted by the committee and law. 4. The woreda administration believes that there will not be any resettlement due to the Project, but will assist any impact on farm land damage and eucalyptus trees.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers pic in JV Core Consulting Engineers 2

Welkite Hossaina Road Project Final Resettlement Action Plan Report

4. Wereda: Chaha IEndibir Participants: Ato Sadik Mohammed Woreda Adminstrator Ato Tagesu Nima Woreda council member Ketema Haile Woreda council member Degemu garuma Woreda council member Abdirezak Seid Woreda council member Abdulahi Mohammed Consultatnt

Agenda: 1. Project impacts 2. Experience of the woreda regarding compensation on involuntary displacement 3. Woreda norms on compensation of assets 4. The capacity of the woreda to assist displacement

Minutes of Meeting: 1. Regarding the impact of the Project, the woreda believes that the positive impact is higher than the negative impacts; 2. The woreda confirms that any impact on the farm land the woreda will cooperate to provide the necessary assistance. 'The woreda will establish a compensation committee that will consist of Project- affected people; 3. The woreda will work out corr~pensationrates with the committee according to the procedure accepted by the committee and law. 4. The woreda administration believes that there will not be any resettlement due to the Project, but will assist any impact on farm land damage and eucalyptus trees.

Metaferia Consulting Engineers plc in JV Core Consulting Engineers 3

ANNEX 7

Vulnerable Group

Annex 7 List of name for Vulnerable group-. I Vulnerable Grouos

Project Affected Name Location(Towns/Wereda) Disabled Female headed Abebech G/Selassie Emdibir 1 l~biiewetSetro I Emdibir I I 1 I l~brarMohammed " Lera 1 dele -- -- Akeml Amel " E~:::ir : Alemnesh Giza Emdibir --; Alemu Terano Amdegebar Redi Mugo 1 - Amina A/hemad Mugo 1 --- Argaw Sema Yeteranzer 1 -- Armaro Areso 1

Atsede Feta 1

Mugo Duna Besher Bella Mugo Chekesa Mariye Emdibir LChernete Dibayu Lera -- -- Degernu Bade Emdibir Detarno Aman " Lera I -ap- -ap- Emdibir 3 1 Endelala Bushra I Duna

Fetu Mohammed Emdibir l~ikru(Wegu) I Emdibir I Gebre Wonjeye Erndibir Geza Maruta I Yeteraaazer & Areket I 1 I~abteMounta imdibir 1 Hadri~aReshd I Duna I Hailu Nezewa Arket Ketema 1 Haji Keyar Lera 1 Hariya ~hGed Mugo 1 Hawedese Ararno (JerrnoSenbo\ Lera 1 Hayeshi Gemal Kebele (02) -- 1 Hulege Nuri Duna 1 - Huletu Neda Emdibir 1 Hulte Kemal Duna 1 Hure Menje Arket Ketema 1 Jemal Ayene Mugo --1 Jernal Lulaymen Mugo -1 Karnila Yilile Emdibir 1 Kedir Aherned Mugo 1 -- Kemal Awel Mugo 1

Vulnerable Groups

Project Affected Name ~ocation(Towns/Wereda) Disabled Female headed Total 1 1 Kemle Hasel " - Kenbar Asena Mugo 1 1 ... - Ladiat Bereka Emdibir 1 1 Madia Reshid " Lera 1 1 Marugu Fejiye Emdibir -1 1 Maymuna Mustefa Mugo 1 1 - Mebeza Sebir Mugo 1 1 Mela Genfer Yeteragazer & Areket 1 1 Mere Geze Yeteragazer & Areket 1 1 - Mergaga Azmareshedi M ugo - 1 1 Demaledebayeber 1 Merima Jehar -1 Meymuna Mustafa Demaledebayeber 1 1 1 Mohammed Awel- " 1 Mohammed Menji Yeteranzer 2 2 Morachi Abate Emdibir 1 1 - Emdibir 1 Muragat Maruta -1 Mustefa Hasen Arket Ketema 1 1 Emdibir 1 1 --Naji Marhe Neku Wujera Emdibir 1 1 Nima Hassen Demaledebayeber 1 1 - Rahameto Reshied I' Lera 1 I 1 Reweda Ahemed Mugo 2 2 Rowada Yasin Lera 1 1 Rukiya Mohammed Lera 1 1 1 1 Rwediya Mustefa " - Sada Behiru Mugo 1 1 Said Beshir Duna 1 1 Sani Abdo Duna 1 1 Sani Jemal Mugo 1 1 Sbtiya She/Jemal Duna 1 1 Selman Aman Mugo 1 1 Seman Mohad " Lera 1 1 Serberi Nuri " 1 1 Sewedad Dadi Emdibir 1 1 Shebeza Feta Mugo 1 1 Shefi Ahemed Yeteragazer & Areket 1 1 Shekurte Eredan Mugo 1 1 Shemsin Hassen M ugo 1 1 Sherkuto Besher Mugo 1 1 Shewa Babi Emdibir 1 1 Shewalem Anedo Yeteragazer & Areket 1 - 1 Sija Egenet Yeteragazer & Areket 1 1 Solomon Sebane Emdibir 1 1 Tafesse (Majer Shumeru) Emdibir 1 1 Tamasgen Bekele 1 1 Tene Sefer Emdibir 1 1 (sf Mugo 1 1

Vulnerable Groups

Project Affected Name Location(Towns/Wereda) Disabled Female headed Total Tideg Emdibir 1 1 Tshele Melese - 1 1 Emdibir Warbabe Endashaw - -1 1 Warga G/Marima Arket Ketema 1 1 Kebul 1 1 Wejer Awel - -- Welchafo Sied Guma 1 1 p-ppp-p Werad Mohammed Emdibir 1 - 1 Workete Halil Demaledebayeber 1 1 - Workite Ahemedin " Lera 1 1 - Worknesh Muktera Emdibir 1 1 - Emdibir 1 Workwera Ahmed - 1 Yawenwet Bezane Emdibir 1 1 Yelma Nuri Mugo 1 1 Yesuf Berka Mugo 1 - 1 Yirga Xeba Yeteragazer & Areket 1 1 - - Lera Zemim Jemal - 1 1 Zenebech Lemma Emdibir 1 1 Total 117

ANNEX 8.A

Inventories of Assets, Project Affected Persons Who Loss Farm land and Trees

Page 2 of 12

Annex 8A (Chaha) : Inventories of Assens ,ProjedAffected persons Who loss Farm land and trees (Chaha Wereda) - ~rualwru~Irualwtus TOY~.Imn.d Wm.r 7Rh.r &n.d ~l(.thmd small tcu.lr(pws r\ma.d men-1 AM Amnd Pnhd UhNd&sat Famllv .ha F.mllr( .la. sh. stz. ln maad*l.dlum corn. ln rrnn-d HOP. &mead 6ns.t V.blt.b.ks L lrvlY L D".(TI.d.,G Tms~s.d..G Comp.ns*thn h.1. Urba. Total PAPS NO Wed. Town UhC rmH&n.d p.opC m. ma* hma Farm hnd Grazinr bnd numb., nurnbar Sk. In numb.. Numb., m numbsr h numb.. Chn Afin.d ChnlS trar. ZWa, T*p. 211 Chaha Emdibir Borkama Habte Bonger 1. 170 . 7 35 . 212 Chaha Emdibir Barkama Habte Kewa 1 3 1 560 70 . 10 . 75 Chat Chat 1 probe aff.n.d pec.11. 2€4 Chaha Emdibir Yefit Terik Endebera Kedir Tassa 265 Chaha Emdibir Yefit Terlk Endebera Kefa Munta 1

Page 6 of 12 Annex 8A (Chaha) : Inventories of hsests ,Project Affected persons Who loss Farm land and trees [Chaha Wereda)- - - t

365 Chaha Emdibir Yefit Terik Endebera Mundeser Hussien 1 3 5 144 11 45 38 366 Chaha Gubre Mundirer Shtrba 1 4 1 110 10 30 67 1 367 Chaha Emdib~r Yefit Ter~kEndebera Munewet Hekade 1 1 4 441 5 18 Abakada 1 368 Chaha Emdibir Yiterek Murad Abdi 1 1 3 108 . 16 . 10 10 1 369 Chaha Emd~b~r Yefit Terlk Endeben Mund Bane 1. 480 . 11 61 . Page 8 of 12 -- ~ 4- -4444444 44-44 4-4-44

------AM- = ;; gsfs';c.* I ;a"=ii. s ggii ...... 4 m 0 04 m 4 9 s

5 j 4 rnO DO z - .J 8 e .g 2r10 1: 2; -e>UTI.= Cl 45 d I - - - - -m n .c 1: 11: u U 4 m mmulo OW YIO s rs m 04 9 dm-u mo mm r.m uj:: ;d- $ l tl ...... m 1 4 2 2 -0'- , t 5 ...... 1 3; (Dm

...... ------...... -- ...... m -YI 0 ulw 2; m dm 2s + 2- m 2 r :;; 2 nv. -u 2;s * a{: .' ' ...... ly' -m 4- h4 YI4 4 w4 u mmm4 0 4 U 'i 2% 2 m m(D mm m 4 ;;; 5 u!:i?j 2 i a : ...... -,: rn u m 4 dm E:' At-4S mz - ,L-5~51 - jlfa I ...... ID- 4 0 4wm e g " m m m-ID :I 0 4 5 ,z X m 4 C C E ...... - --- ... -1 0- oul -mmomom-- OW00 r.ul um rn0 o-ommom w r.4 0- ~,."+++WL.?4 -- 044 LOu 74 u 4 4 "3 44 4 4 + + ., f 4 444 um szf 5: F?, z...... -g dm 4 ID m m um m m -mmmmwu mul-m umm4 4 - D 21 - E: z* ...... j 4- m -, 4 4 UYI 4 m wm ul-(~uulwul ~WLDUm4mm '6:* .- 2z I $1 1% ...... ------. . ... --- - 4-4----4---4-----4-4--4--444------44~444-4d4---~4~~44 B .. Et 7 Sc' - ODa

:222z::~2:2:~;2:222222:r2:2!2222:2r:22p222222:22::2::;; %uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"uf2222222222222222222Prrr2222EE222222222222:222~2222~~~ mwhmmo-~mun ,uuuuu~wwu~uuuuuuuu3fB3~ff~~rrs999::ss~%%~%~%%%%%$$$$$~4~~~~~~4~~~f~~~4~34~mwmwhmmo~~num(~r.~m00~m I Shifa 1 1101. 1 13 1 181. 1 I I I 5271chaha 1 Erndlb~r l0orkarna l~sefuNeda 1I 3 1 11. 1351. [Kazrnir II 5281chaha l~rndlb~r l~~rar l~regayeNeda 1 I 3 31 6501 1. I 681chat (chat 1. I I II

Page 10 of 12 l~ernengest Adorhe Keb 10001 1 1. I 1 I

Page 11 of 12 Page 12 of 12 ANNEX 8.B

ANNEX B: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost

ANNEX 8B: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost 111I , Cost I I I Cost ~stimate1 1 Estimate ~ for ~otal 1 for house Fences j area of Administr Woreda/hebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs I Houses Fences f0rsq.m fora lm the Cost Estimate Cost Estiniat No. ative Zone wn) Name) Type of property Category Categow- floor area of length House for house for Fences ~ d 1 I

1 Guragie Kebena .I EHETA W/GEYOR(;ES _ _ I Mud house 1 KIB :--!--- 4 2,595.53- , __-: ~O~L-. -- -- 1 IGuragVbena1 -~ - - ,~/ALEMAZE AREGAWE~.~ 1 Mud house 1 Guragie Kebena - ~ Mud house T---~ 4 l~uragie l~ebena ~ATRAGUYE ! ~udhouse /K~B 1 1 720.00 i - ~ 7 I 5 lGuragie IKebena 1 GATHUN (Mud house lKlB I 1 720.00 / _I I 20 IMURA KADDERY 1 Mud house LIK~B / 720.00 1 - 1 27 NURE HASANE /Mud house K1B I 1 720.00 - 1 26 -ty Guragie --Kebena HADERMOSQUE BEZANE Mud house -I 1 K~B 720.00 1 -

-- 1720.00 - I 2E in I I I 11 IGurag~e /cheha/~ubrte 1 ENDEREsE --___ _ 1 ~udhouse _ k1~_i - - - ~ 7001 0' 27 1 27 / 7 1 12 Gurag~e Cheha/Gubr~e IMURAD Mud houseAMOD /~udhouse IC~D 700 00 1 11 10 - - 13 Gurag~e ChehaIGubr~e ZURYASH~ud ~OUS~AMOD ~"dhouse -C1D / 1 70000 j - 261 9 / /SEYFUZELEK MU^ house /C~D 1 1 1 - 5 1 9 1 7 t-- ~ 14 , GOVERNMENT IWOODEN FENCE I c3-- I - -- 47 00 3 1 45 1 -- 16 I~uragle '~heha/Gubrle 1 KEDER KARSAMA I Mud house WOODEN FENCE !C~D IC~D 1 2-l5 17 IGuragle Cheha/Gubr~e IFEKDU SHK Mud house - -lClD 1 1 70000 1 12

I WOODEN FENCE Mud house - YEMAME ASEFAW WOODEN FENCE ABDR SHEKUR 1 Mud house/CIS FENCE C~C /CZB TAMRAT BALAKIR ~udhouse/WOODEN FENCE MEHEMED AKMEL ;~udhouse/WOODEN FENCE ClC JCZD 25 Guragle ~heha/~ubrie HUSEN SHAFO Mudhouse/WOODENFENCE

26 !Guragie I~heha/~ubrle SHAMIL LEMA ~udhouse/WOODEN FENCE -- 27 j~uragie -]cheha/~ubrie FKERA TEREDA I Mud house/WOODEN FENCE ------_ 28 IGuragie Icheha/~ubrie MANAWER DULA /Mud house lClD 1 700.00 -29 ,Guragie Cheha/Gubrie_ WERKU KEDER 1 Mud house 700.00 5 1 3 / Mud house ]C~D Mud house.WO0DEN FENCE :C~D C2D 70000 4700 ! -- Mud house.WOODEN FENCE iClC C2D 764.30 47.00 I Mud house/WOODEN FENCE lClD C2D 700.00 47.00 Mud house/WOODEN FENCE C2D 700.00 47.00 -- ;C~D 35 Guragie ChehaIGubrie ~WEDNESHAHMED _ IMud house/WOODEN FENCE C1D IC~D / 700.00 1 4700 36 Guragie ChehajGubrie ISHEMSU 37 Cyrag~e Cheha/Gubr~e KlDANl YLMA 38 Guragk .ChehajGubrie GARMA NDA WOODEN FENCE 39 Guragie ChehaIGubr~e GABRA SHRAT WOODEN FENCE

Page 1 of 35 ANNEX 8B: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost I I I I I I i Cost 1 1 I 1 1 Cost ( Estimate lofthe 1 i ! property I within ! Affected ROW 1 Area[mi!) - 1 Lyz:h (Houses) Houses 1 Fences MU~hause.WOO0EN FENCE T

~

48 rha/Gubrie WE"'"'SOMA 1 Mud house/WOODEN FENCE 49 Guragie Cheha/Gubrie NUREDEN MEHEMED ~~~~S~/~~ENFENCE =Guragie ChehaIGubrie MEHEMED AREG Mud house/WOOOEN FENCE 51 !Guragie 1 Mud house/WOOOEN FENCE /Cheha/~ubrie-- 1 ------

Mud house - -

GARMA /AWELHELEL :Mud hause/WOOOEN FENCE 512.17 __ . - WOODEN FENCE 185 185 ( 20~. 141,468.80 1 11,078.27 - 100 59 40 764.30 47.00 - 11 15 715.11 13 588.40 HEYLU H/SLASA 4 179.26 806.52 150.00 39 5.838.09 . 33 - l1 4 1 319.36 ) YRECAZHE G/MEDN -- 1 10 491.67 1 21 I 968.79 ( 22 1,012.28 1 21 998.87 1 14 669.05 29 1.354.68 -. .------

--0 / 13 1.63 629.25

Page 2 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con )ensation cost

I I I I I I I Cost I Cost ~shmate' %ofthe ' Est~mate for Total property I for house Fences areaof w~th~n Affected Length I I I Cost Estimate . Cost Estimate Admlnlstr Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs Houses 1 Fences for for a I 1 the ROW ! Area(m2) - (mJ- I No. at~veZone I wn) I Name) Type of propeny I Category I Category, floorarea (Houses) ' Houses Fences for house for Fences - -. 1 .- - - of length , Houm -- 1 -.-- 1 I -_ -_ Mudhouse 'C~D j 100 / 119 83,571.46 1 - --- 16.723.63 1 Mud house j 700.00 - i loo 24 1 - 1 I -- - ... - - - -- IC~D -_1 - . 24 36,250.20 85 Curagie ChehaIGubrie ~~DURMEJED 1 Mud house ___- - ; 52 1 . i 1,604.70 86 Curag~e ChehaIGubrie 1 ASEFFA WOODEN FENCE 8 47.00 1 _..-.- .

87 Guragie ChehaIAmora Meda . - ~TANESYE WHOUSE. - TiL .- 700.00 , - - - -- 88 Curagie lCheha/Amora Meda I MAKEDASE J~s~-p..p- ICID 1 700.00 ; - +-- ! dp~&-- 89 Curagle Cheha/Amora Meda [MEFTA MUDHOUSE IC~D 1 70000 ! - / 90 Guragie ~heha/AmoriF .-- 1 MUD HOUSE iClD 700.00 1 . 39 I 1 91 Curagie Cheha/Amora Meda BAHERU 1 MUD HOUSE 92 Curagie Cheha/Amora Meda ~UKTAREKARACA 1 wooden fence ----. ~ ---. ~ 93 Curagie Cheha/Amora Meda jSEFNElA ___-JTUKUL 94 Guragie ChehaIAmora Meda 1 wooden fence L - 95 ~Curagie ChehaIAmora Meda 1 ITukul/FL/Wooden fence 96 Curagie /Cheha/~mora~ed- 97 Guragie Chrha/AmoraMeda /MURADESAMNE , 98 Curagie Cheha/Amora Meda ~MEFTASAMNE 1 wooden fence

-

I MUD HOUSE-- . -- -

MANURE NASER -- - TUKUL SEKURE 1 Wooden fence CZD 4700 42 ITASECA -- - -- I 1 ITUKUL C1E 780 20 64 TASECAsEKURE-- _ - 1 107 / Curagle 1 ~heha~~tarke LAMA MOHMADE 2!!k. - C1E ' I 78020 1 - 1 31 108 jCuragle lCheha/Ytarke JAMALE FARAJA 1 Wooden fence-- I ~CZD 1 4700 109 Curagie ChehaIYtarke PATEROS FAREA h!denlene- .--...-p-- 1 ~CZD 1 - i 47.00 ' 4 ' 110 l~ura~ie cheha/Ytarke 1 PATEROS FAREA I MUD HOUSE IC~B, 80652j - I WCurag~e I~hehafltarke BAKANAAUMARE ,!Wooden fence -- 112 Curagie ICheha/Ytarke CABERALAHABA ,(wooden fence - 47.00 1 113 Curag~e cheha/Ytarke AMETEBALKI MUZMIM ~TUKUL IClE 1 1 780.20 . ,

Curagie I~hehafltarke - TUKUL .. 63000 . i 114 ~FIF7--I r~--1 115 Curagie ~hehafltarke TAMAME KADER Wooden lence . 47.00 ...... --LGL ~--.... - 116 Curagie --Gh,ha/Ytarke MANURE NASER Wooden fence ICZD ~ .:- 11 7 Curagie Chehafltarke-__--_ FADELU HUSANE i Wooden fence Curagie Tl;bodenfence 118 MENWTE TAMAME . -- - -.. - -- MANURE NASER MANURE NASER /TUKUL 780 20 13 121 Cu-ragie icheha/~ta!a -as Kedir '[MUD HOUSE 122 Curag15 lCheha/Ytarke ~BEH~UHAYELA 47!'o ,. - 123 Curagie--_Ch~ehafltarke SUMEYAABSERO 50

Page 3 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost - I

-- --

1.550.89 1.154.67 , 21,248.59 I 13 634.45 -~ TAKEl-4 KUREMA -- -.- 1 Wooden fence 24 1 1.137.27 38 1,779.42

'C2D 41 -- 100 94 51 4.272.53

50

--

-. -- -

..~

~SAMEBASABERADA

15 704.27 p- 1 Wooden fence 1.297.3J 985.23 ISANEY MOCHIEMED 17 789.45

1 JAM ALE---^ - .. 373.45 154 Gurag,~ Cheha/Koaya ~TUREYZAPERYA MUD HOUSE 155 l~ura~ie Cheha/Koaya (ARECUFACEYA ,!TUKUL 3.645.37 156 Guragie ChehajKoaya [YEBCATA CHKESA -- ITUKUL 9 - 1,148.28 C1D 700.00 11.476.25 3.729.01 pp 700.00 - 38 11 3,029.88 630.00 31 16 3,136.73

50 -~

-- 168 7,896.21 16.17 1 - c1 0- 50 sop 40 27,993.00 1

Page 4 of 35 ANNEX 8B: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con ensation cost I I I I ( Cost I I I Cost Estimate % ofthe 1 Estlmate I for Total 3roperty I for house Fences area of within Affected Length Name of the owner(PAPs 1 Houses Fences for sq m , for. Im the ROW Area(m21 - (m)- Cost Estimate Cost Estimatc atlve Zone Name) Type of property Category, Category floor area , of length Hnuee Houses) Houses Fences for house for Fences ------9 Suragle lCheha/Koaya SEWARAGEHAYELA /MUD HOUSE -- - iClD 1 1 70000 - I 23 -- 40 2,588.27 1

/CUREMATAKELA [MUD HOUSE - - lcl!. -- - 70000 42 18.921.00 j - --1 / I- Zurag~e Cheha/Koaya IABEDALA SADAMO I 50 23.788.80--- 1 Suragie Cheha/Koaya i 22 24.93 I -. ;-- 700.00 1-1,- hragie Cheha/Koaya -- .-. L--E.E.~--L 50 - hragie '~heha/~oa~a I BEZA FARESA . !, --50 172.511p kragie ChehalKoaya HALETUNEDA TUKUL 630.00 . 50 32.39 I I --iuragie ChehajKoaya DEREGE CHEKSA ~TUKUL /C~E ! I 780.20 - I hragle Cheha/Koaya 1 HYELU GURA TUKUL /C~E / I 78020 1 -- I iuragle Cheha/Koaya -.I HYELU GURA TUKUL ICE I 78020 , -- 50

--TUKUL

Wooden fence . -- 47.00 1

-

(wooden fence 1 - c2D 1 - ( 47.00 1 - 7-1-; Wooden fence ! C2D , L-L~!?~~--

;uragie Chehallndibir Town TAMERAT TESEL 1 wooden-- fence- -- -- &bir Town WERKENESH MUKTAR I Wooden fence i ;uragie Cheha/lndibirTown WERKENESH MUKTAR MUD HOUSE ;urag~e Chehallndibir Town ELEYAS MUD HOUSE

;uragie Cheha/lndibirTown ELEYAS-- /wooden fence I

;uragle j~hehallndibirTown ~DESALEGE ;MUD HOUSE /C~C I 764.30 / . 60 ;urag~e /~heha/lndibir own i~asew~e~efu -- - C1B I 1 806.52 1 1 ... -.141 ;uragie ~- I~heha/lnd~bir own /~~deru ~ari~uatedIron sheer fence 1 72.00 1 I iuragie Chehallndibir Town WELDE DEREGE iMUD HOPE iuragie ]~heha/lndibir own FEKERE /MUD HOUSE ~_ ! 111 _ . . - .764.30!. .;-.. - ~uragle /~heha/lnd~b~r~~FEKEDE REDU - /C~C- 1 - 764 30 ' _ __ - 65 - hrag~e Cheha/lndlblr Town+ MUD HOUSE C1C 1 76430 1 1 56 ~uragle Cheha/lnd~blrTown ,Yerega Halle Wooden fence CZD 4700 -- - 1 ! 1 ~uragle /Cheha/lndlblr-- Town /yerega Ha~le C+1 (Murara wendeneh esen~ubulld~ng) IClA 1 1 2 23023 ------~heha/lndlblr own 1 WAHATA TAYA - MUD HOUSE . -- IC~C I 76430 .- turagle I~heha/lnd~b~rTown 1 !!!E!HOU!E-_ 24 ~uragle- /~heha/lndlblr own 'GERMA MULESA BLD __+GT j- {--? 2G2~1 -- -rx ruragie- Cheha/lnd~b~rTown/FATU MOCHIEMADE BLD - jcl~ I 2,23023119 ,uragle Cheha/lnd~b~rTown WAREKA BLD i -- C2!- - 80652,- _- -142 urage- +h.hl/lndlblrTown+- -- tETAFARw~~~ MUD HOUSE - - CIB 1 806 52 - 126 pheha/lnd~birTown ~UBALKEW/SANBIMTEE 1 MUD HOUSE -- CIB ~ ~- 806.52 i . ,I 119 ' BLD . , uragie Cheha/lndiblrTownLMOSEKE ~ -- ~ .. - !CIA -1 2.230.231 34

Page 5 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost I I I I I I I 1 Cost 1 II I I I I % of the

of the owner(PAPs Cost Estimate Cost Estimate No. ative zone Name) for house for Fences - -. Type of property 1

206 (~ura~ie Chehallndibir Town Masonary fence -.~~ 4 658.02 3 1 0 806.52 1 0

.- 18 4 ~- .~- Coriguated iron sheet fence 45 -. . .. . - - -- 20

-- -~L--.

,wooden fence 27 ------. .

Page 6 of 35 ANNEX 8B: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con ensation cost I I I I I I I I 1 Cost 1 I I 1 1 I I Cost , Estimatei Oh of the Estimate ' for Total ProPercy I : for house / Fences area of within Affected Length Houses Fences for sqm for a lm the ROW Area(m2) - (m)- Cost Ertlmate Cost Esf~matc Houses Fences for house for Fences- Type of property I Category Cafegory floor area I of length.;..- House (Houses) ~~---- I

.-

Wooden fence - 47.00 1 - ..~ - ' /MUD HOUSE ~TUKUL /wooden fence

!MUD HOLISE-. - 257 Guragie Chehaflnd~birTown ~TASFAYSERWERY /MUD HOUSE A 10 ~ -- 258 Curagie Chehajlndabir Town ~TASFAYSERWERY !TUKUL --25 1 13 i .-

259 Curagie Chehajlnd~birTown I -- 260 Guragie Cheha/lnd~birTown !TA]UMANNEE !MUD HOUSE I-""

261 Curagie Chehajlndibir Town /Blserna Tuka --. . ~ TUKUL - -. IClE 1 _ --i 78020- , ~ - 262 Curagie Chehajlndibir Town IBESAMA TUKA __ /Wooden fence A_$?-..1- 47.00 1 I - j 47.00 1 I CE--- .- - 1 Wooden fence -1 h-1.. 1 47.00 1 - wooden fence CZD 47.00 1 -.-I .-- -- ~TUKUL Wooden fence -. ,-. -. .-T----,CZD 1 - 47.00 ,

268 i~uragie Chehajlndibir Town ~NURESAFAAHMADE .1 wooden fence . -. --. . .. Lc2D 1 4700L-

?G~rT~heha/lnd~b~r own I 'wooden fence . - i ! -1~ -- -- . 1 .- -- - - j~ura~ie ~heha/~e~eshewaraTE=------:Wooden fence -- -1 !C~D . 47.00 270 - 1 271 Gurag~e I~heha/~egeshewara DAGAMU I wooden fence I C~D 1 4700' - - 1 -*--/ A - 272 IGuragle ChehafYegeshewara ;DACAMU - TUKU~ -- -- - 7Fl E 780 20 1-. 'I _ -50 -- ~Guragle ChehaIYegeshewara WALEDA Wooden fence ----!C2D I 47001 273 - - -- - t-- - 274 ;Guragle Cheha/Yegeshewara_ TENKERSAREHE TUKUL WOODEN FENCE 78020 4700 '

275 lGurag1e Cheha/Yegeshewara YOHANES ADABA - Wooden fence - [IE !CZDC2D 1 47-- 276 'Gurag~e LhehajYegeshewara TlGlSTU HAlLE Wooden- fence- IC2D I =7&l0: Cheha/iegeshewara ITAKA SARKEHA /wooden fence L 4700 -- - -- 278 Gurag~-Teha/Yegeshewara TSAAEBANY -&Wooden=- - -- 2 47JO ' -1 1 wooden fence I 47 00 ; I------1 Wooden fence -- 47001 T - -- I I C1D ::I MUD HIJUSE 1 70000 ' -- *-1- - 4700 IC~D 4700 1 -- - 1 --- C1E 1 780 20 I -50 7- CIE L---- 780 20 --50 1 -- C2D -, I 47UO-- - - TAKA NEMATA -287 Gurag~e lCheha/Yegeshewara 'wooden fence - - I C2D -I- 4700__ --

Page 7 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con ensation cost I I ! I I I i Cost I I i %of the

Name) I Type of property .- Wooden fence --. - 289 l~uragie ,Cheha/Cerare CHURCH 1 wooden fence

290 lCuragie Cheha/Gerare WE~ERAABEZA -~ Wooden fence 291 wooden fence 47.00 1 -- /Curagle~,~~--. FR- 1 ~-.. - . .- IC~D I:! YOSAFE FATA 1 wooden fence I~aodenfence -- - - 47.00 ~

!Wooden fence !MUD HOUSE

300 iGuragie /~heha/Gerare pKBE8EFNCATA 1 MUD HOUSE L-- 301 Curagie &eha/Cerare MAKBEBE MANCATA-_ -_ -- Wooden fence ~ :,xi 302 Gurag~e-~heha/Cerare ~W=W=-_ -- 47.00 , _ - 303 Guragie IChehajCerare HEALTH CENTER Wooden fence 1 47.00 -- 1 4 -- - .. .. ., /

304 Curagie iCheha/Gerare YAKOBE BAREMATA Iwooden fence - - ~ ! - 47.00 1

305 Curagie i~heha/Cerare ~KAMALEMOCHIEMADE ,Wooden fence -- ! I!?? i--pLL+?7L-Tp----- I 780.20 - 1 -50 Wooden fence 47.00 (TUKUL ..~------309 jCuragie /Cheha/Cerare ---I CABERA- 3 10 iCuragie Cheha/Cerare TSECAYA NADA 311 jGuragie 1 cheha/Cerare --~-TEMARECA BARAE-- - [Woode~kce iCZD -.--1~ 47.00 1 312 /Curagle I~heha/Gerare ,ARECA BARAKA ,Wooden fence a- ! wooden lence

MAWELADE W/GABERAL ;MUD HOUSE CID , I .---70000 66 315 Gura ie ICheha/Cerare IFAKADUKNSETDA Wooden lence I-C2D;~ ~.-L ?FIG& j~/~erare INUR=NAWALE +;emir: , D 47.00 3 17 Guragie ! Cheha/Gerare NUREBACN AWALE . ~ 41

318 /Curagie Cheha/Cerare JCABERU BARCA ------I IczD . 47.00

Wooden fence

~-

-.. .- .-- --!wooden fence CZD 1 47.00 ~ -, /Wooden lence wooden lence

-- -~ -~ 47.00 I /CZD1-- .. ~:.-~

Page 8 of 35

ANNEX 8B: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost Cost I I I Cost Estimate %of the I ! Estimate for Total I for house Fences area of Adrninistr 1 Woreda/kebele(to 1 Name of the owner(PAPs Houses Fences f0rsq.m for a Irn the Type of property 1 category1 category 1 floor area / of length._ House 1 76430 69 CZD 372 Guragle Chehaj~akuna LEKELESH BELACHEW WOODENFENCE&MUDHOUSE ICIC J~D -;6430 47:O TUKUL IC~E ! _- i- 78051 1

376 Gurag~e lchehaj~akuna ~TUKUL 1 . I -

--377 /curagle Cheha/Dakunav KEBADEi~~~~~~~~~~~ 378 Ffha/Dakuna A ,MUD HOUSE -- - 1 11 TKULWOODENFENCE ~CZD- - 4700 1 - 50 p---- 1- - 1 Wooden fence 1 1 - I TUKUL 1 - 1 50

- Wooden fence 1 I 40

386 (Guragie -Chehaj~akuna /MEDABU BADEHA /MUD HOUSE - .~ ~IDI 1 14OOIL-..l-.-s .

Wooden fence

BLD

396 IGurag!e lchehaykuna !Masonry fence 1 - 1 397 (Curagie Cheha Dakuna -_ LBAFEKERU KEBEDE /BLD C1B - 80652 ! v1 1 - 1 IBLD

TUKUL ~

402 kuragle ChehaIDakuna SCHOOL MUDHOUSE /C~D I I 70000 - 203

403 Gurag~e ChehaIDakuna MUD HOUSE 1 clc .764 30 36 IC~D 700 00 87 IWOODEN FENCE I C2D 1----A- 47 00 TAMAREY ITUKUL /CIF 1 630.00 1 ENSETDA GERMA- I MUD HOUSE CID &OO.OO 1 - j-- Wooden fence 47.00 1 24 47.00 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost I I I i i I I I cost I II I I I- Cost ~st;:te %of the / 1 istimate 1 TOUI for house Fences area of Affected Length i I I I 'z?? Cost Estimate 1 Administr Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs I Houses Fences f0rsq.m I 'Or a Im the ROW 1 Area(mZ) - (m)- Cost Estimate

Name) Type of property I ~ate~orylCategory i floor area of length p-House (Houses) -- Houses I1 Fences- -- for house for Fencer .~--- -. --- 1 1 2.372.09 DENBU SHERKETA - --- 76.00 - 2-

- 5 TUKUL 780.20 3,129.33 I 1,073.24

418 Guragie Cheha /Mochie BOCALA YNADA - 706.32 419 Guragie Cheha /Mochie , BOCALA YNADA 1 WOODEN FENCE 1,846.51 ~TUKUL&WOODEN FENCE 50 64 8.640.31 3,003.16 (TUKUL 31,667.71 -- 50 31.667.71 I

WOODEN FENCE -. 47 103 - 34

50 --

6 -. -~-

3 j 2 49.90 28

439 Curagie JchehaJ~ochie /BALAYEKOTU MUDHOUSE -MUDHOUSE- - -!MUD HOUSE 442 Guragie ,Cheha JMochie SCHOOL - .. - -- -. 443 /Curagie i~heha/~o~hk SCHOOL - . -

/SCHOOL p~ -!Cheha JMochie ~HELTHCENTARE _-

1 Cumerj~ardana ISAMESU HASANE 630.00 1 --

39.217.69

.-- ---

625566 1 - TUKUL I ~ ~.- ~ - -.- -

Page 11 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost I I I I i I I ; Cost I

Type of property

453 Guragie Gumer/Bardana KAFO ~kuragie ..- *!------~--. 455 Guragie Gurner/Bardana WAKEY

TUKUL 630.00

Wooden fence

- I 92 50

.

.. MUD HOUSE 700 00 Ti= ;TUKUL 780.20 - 1 50 Wooden fence

TUKUL ClE ~ TUKUL

780.20 50 -- --480 ]~ura~le I Gurner/Bardana /RAJAKORAY 50 481 curagle Turner/Bardana --I MIA KORAY _ Wooden fence TUKUL TUKUL

Wooden- fence ! !LAGASA GAMEDA ITUKUL 780 20 _ J~UKUL 488 Guragie IGurner/Bardana 'MULEGATABALYNAH _ -_- 489 Guragie Gurner/~ardana ~NOAMBALYNAH

492 A Guragle I Gumer/Ba&~ l~oodenfence A-1 1 _I-. _ ANNEX 88: List ofAffected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and cor ensation cost I I I I I Cost I I I I Cost Estimate ~ % of the Est~rnate / for Total property for house Fences ' area of within Affected Length Houses Fences 1 forsq rn fora lrn the ROW Area(rn2) - 1 (m)- Cost Estimate Cost Estimate ' No. at~veZone Name) Type of property I Catego4 Category floor area of length 1 Hose [Houses) Houses Fences for house - for Fences- -- 1-- - , -. - .------21 2,489.86 -- 15-- 5,717 86 39,217 69 --

- C1D

BLD

BLD -. .. .-

514 /Guragie Gumer/Bardana c;fence I L L I I 515 Guragie GumerjBardana TENAYE TSEDAYA 1~1- ! 630.00 , .- -- 1 516 1 Guragie GumerIBardana TENAYE TSEDAYA /TUKUL - -- !CIE - 78020.- [+: 1 I ]Gurag)e /Gumer/~ardana _ TSEDAYA MUD HOUSE lclD ! 700.00 - -, 93 --517 ITENAYE I -.-- 1 1 518 jGuragie /Gumer/Bardana-- ~ZENBECH-. HAlLlE MUD HOUSE I h~ . 700.00/ - --68 I 1 I 1 wooden fence ji..-1 -1 wooden fence 1 -- Wooden fence .I .! - -1Wzen fence ~--a -1 -i Wooden fence

. I

' . !wooden fence ! --. . - 780.20 - 50 ~ TUKUL -. . /CIE ! .1 ~-1 I

~~. ~ . - 531 i~ura~ie i~umer/~ardana ~DAWETE IMUD "OUSE -'ClD ~ 1 700.00 ' - ~ ];Lie 532 j~urnerf~ardana WHAyELA / MUDz>E--~- -. ~-IClD ! - 1 _- 700.00. - _i_ 65 533 Guragie :Gurner/~ardana - .- -- (DAWETE HAYELA . IMUD HOUSE C~D I I 700.00 ! :/ -63

Page 13 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con ensation cost j Cost I I II I ~ Es;,":te %of the st ntal property

Fences area of tiAffect: L;::h Name of the owner(PAPs 1 Houses Fences frfor a I the ROW Area(m2) - Cost Estimate Cost Estimatc (Houses) Houses Fences

GumerIBardana /ASMFASE KATAMA --- GumerIBardana IAYALASE ZAEA 48 - Gumer/Bardana IBEREKAG/MEDA 538 ~ura~ie GumerIBardana (BEREKAGIMEDA 539 jCuragie GumerIBardana 1 I~oodenfence 540 &ragie ;Gumer/Bardana IWEDNAHE MANGASA MuOHOus~ . --

MUD HOUSE - 1 67 TUKUL 780 20 50 /wooden fence 2 i CIE 780.20 -: 50 C1E 1 780.20 50 C1E I 780.20 1 - , 50 C1E 780.20 1 - 50 C~E / 780.20 i - 50

700.00 _ T* CIE j 1 780.20 Wooden fence I i i TUKUL CIE / 780.20 1 . so I 556 /Gura&/~umer/~ardana i MUD HOUSE 95

- LWE!?k"!ence=-. ~ ~. ~TUKUL -- -.- - -

50

Wooden fence TUKUL - 50 ~TUKUL 'ClF 1 63000 1-- -i so Wooden fence 1

/TUKUL -_ - _ - 50 TUKUL TUKUL C1E 1780 20 -- 50 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost I I I I I I I 1 Cost 1 I I I % of the property within Affected Length Administr Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs ROW I Area(m2) - (m)- (Houses) Houses Fences No. ative Zone -. wn)-- Type of property / 575 Guragie Curner/Bardana +SU DASU 29 / 14 576 Guragie Curner~irdFAYAENSETDA TUKUL 577 Curagie Gurner/Bardana - wooden fence 578 Guragie Gurner/Bardana wooden fence 579 Guragie GurnerIBardana TEZAZU MAMO ITUKUL 580 Guragie Gurner/Bardana AGAZE TUKUL

--581 Guragie Gumer/Bardana , FARESE TUKUL C1E 582 I Guragie Gumer/Bardana I WAKEY BER~DA TUKUL 583 IGuragie Gumer/Bardana 1 WALEDA Wooden fence -A 47.00 1 pKUL-1 7- klE I 780.27 - ! 50 -7-- 1 ITukul ICE 780.20 - i 50 I [TUKUL __~.ccI , 630.00 . j, 50 , I 1 Wooden fence - 47001 wooden fence 1 .-- -- I 4700 ~ - JTUKUL !--*---

-- . -- --

-- TUKUL ITUKUL

Wooden fence 47.00 -- -- 1

TUKUL ------IC~E 78020 1--- 1 so .- . i IC~D1 - 1 TUKUL ]CIE 780.20 50 - -- . - , 1 - 600 Curagie Curner/Bardana I 1 wooden fence I Curagie !~umer/Bardana 60 1 1 HIMAREAM BEZANE I EL - -1 -

602 Curagie !Cumer/Bardana BEZANE ~TUKUL-- ATADESE - - -A ~- 1.- 18°.20 1 .---- - 603 jCuragie /Curner/Bardana 1 BEZANE FERSHA 'TUKUL ClF 1 1 630.00 ~ Curagie l~umerj~ardana .. .. 50 604 ~SHUREYESUF.-- - -- .- -. -- -- iclE-.. - _-780.20 50 I ~ 605 l~ura~ieI Cumer/Bardana /BADE SHEFO TUKUL 780.20 1 - .-50 .

606 I Curagie Cumerj~ardana ~SERA-SHEFO ~KUL !C'!__~I 630.00 1 p-~- . -50 1 /

TUKUL 1 . 1 780.20 1 --. . 1 50 --- 39 1 ~- I 1-- TUKUL 1 1 780.20 1 - 1 50 76 38 84 - - -- I 1 20 1 -- loo-

37 --

~ ~ I:: 1 - ! -~ -.~-0.- 100 L-- 50 .- p~ 1

615 IGuragie (~urnerjlernbn~ :CANBAZE I Wooden fence ~ - 1 47.00 -~ -- . i 46-

Page 15 of 35 Page 16 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affectedpersons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost I I I I I I Cost I 11 I I I % of the property I w~th~n Affected Length ROW Area(m2) - (ml- Cost Estimate I Cost Estirnatl Type of property (Houses) Houses Fences for house&ricer - - .. - --L

-. . j-

TUKUL

670 Guragie

.- .- -

wooden fence fence - (wooden 675 Curagie CumerjEnjawe BABA MUZA TUKUL 676 Curagle CumerIEnjawe BABA MUZA ~TUKUL 677 , Curagie CumerIEnjawe ~NURDEINYASlN I Curagie-- Cumer/Enjawe MENSUNE NECA 678 -~ 679 jCuragie Cumer/Enjawe Mosque -- 48 680 l~uragie / Curnerl~njawe HUSANE JAMALE /TUKUL CIE -- . I 7----=.20 - : 50 T~~-~~~-~AKMELJAMALE -r= IC~E 1 1 780.20 L . 50

1 wooden fence -. - -~

jWooden fence ~ -~ . I~?!.L--- 47.00 j 1,155.1!

Page 17 of 35 ANNEX 8B: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost OSt I I II I ~ %of the 1 Estimate Total property

Type of property Category Category ! floor area of length. House -47.00 - 47.00 32 C2 D 47.00 C2D 47.00 C1E 780.20 - 1 50 C1E I 780.20 50 - C1E i 780.20 50 C1E 1 780.20 1 - C1E I 780.20 / -

/wooden fence -- -- - .. -- -- 'TUKUL

--t

719 Curage CumerJBerdena ~HEKESAMOSHA _ TUKUL C1E I -- -- 1 3-- -- 7I - 780201. I.-_ - ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost I I I 7 I 1 I I i Cost I I I Cost 1 ~shmatel Est~mateI for Tobl for house Fences area of Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs Houses I Fences forsq m for a Im , the Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Type of propeq for house for Fences wn) Name) -. ~~ -- I %tegory Category i floor arealof length 1 TUKUL =I&-998.02 ~TUKUL - 780.20+-~-7 - 1 50

L741 Guragie Curner/Danegeza ABDU MOHl - / 780.20 1 - i 50 742 Guragie CurnerIDanegeza SULTANE MOCHIE 743 Curagie Cumer/Danegeza ABDU EBRHEME TUKuL-p.pC1E 1 780.20 1 : ~ :i 744 Curagie (Gurner/~ane~eza IASERARE KADER TUKUL /CIE 1 780.20 1 - 50 745 /~ura~ie /Cumer/~ane~eza / AKSESE KADER TUKUL , 780d - 1 50 746 Curagie Gurner/Danegeza 'SESE KADER - 747 Curagie Gurner/Danegeza HUSANE NUREY MUD HOUSE 63 748 Curagie Curner/Danegeza BEZA KARACA ! 780.20 j - -- - 749 Curagie Cumer/Cata I '_ULWooden fence 1

750 Curagie Curner/Gata - wooden fence 1 - --

751 Curagie Curner/Cata MUNTATE ZANECO (TUKUL . -- .- 752 Curagie /~urner/~ata MURADUAWEL -- ~TUKUL 753 Curagle 'Curner/Cata CHURCH COMPUND 1 Wooden fence aCurner/cata -/Woadenlencep-'~-______-- 2 755 ICuragie /Curner/Cata / NCAANA SARAGA 1 630.00 / - / 50 sr~:- -. /~urner/~ata -- ARECAATECABA IMUO HOUSE fidr- 1 7;0=-v 757 ICuragie !Curner/Arket KADER -. /wooden fence IC~D i - 47.00 1 758 lCuragie IGurner/ArketJ--- wooden fence i --T~~-.I~T-- . ~ 759 1 Curagie /Cumer/Arket I MUD HOUSE IC~C 1 1 764.30 !. 115 7-- - WELDAY ACEZA 2,230.23 1 . I I FJLL /MUD HOUSE i 764.30 / - - -. 1 2' 762 1 Curagie CurnerlArket 1 -- iwooden fence I '. --- r- 763 ~~Cumer/Arket 1 BREHANU YELMA !Wooden fence 2 47.00 -..- -, -. . -~~ ! 1 764 &ragie !Cumer/Arket ' wooden fence. - ! - -- I -- I]:;!- -- 700.00 / 236 700.00 I 13

MOCHIEMADEMANCA _ IMUD, HOUSE - -!C~C I .. 764.30- -~~fe--

p--'MUD HOUSE 700.00 ~ 768 Curee- CurnerlArket _ I ~AKALAMEGA ( - ! -- 769 Curagie Curner/Arket 1 POLICE STAION MUD HOUSE . 48 - , , 770 Curagie GfArket !MALASA I' I' ,-!MUD HOUSE xp 1I ! 700,?0! - /-__.18 771 ICuragie IGurner/Arket i D!-_____-.~ 772 Curagie lGurner/Arket ICEBRA LENCAYA 773 Curagie Cumer/Arket LEMA HOUSE IZERCA MUD --. 774 Guragie ,Gurner/Arket ]ZERGA LEMA 775 , Curagie ,Curner/Arket MU0 HOUSE- i ClC 764.30 j j 1 38 YASIN ~MUDHOUSE i 764.30 ~.- ! 36 :+--- 776 lCuragie /Curner/Arket - 81 ____ -- ~ZERCALEMA _ - 700.00- - LH~UZE 'C~D I- 777 curagie /Curner/Arket--- :MALES MUDHOUSE .. -- 7"430c-~_L-- ' 65 1 ?8Turagie IGumeet TADASA HABETA !,,,- . .. ..------...---A- / 806.52 ! - 1 779 / Curagle IGumerlArket ADDIS RAGE IMUD HOUSE IC~B 80652 41 - -- ! -- -- ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con ensation cost I I I I I ! I I Cost I I I Cost Estimate % of the Estimate for Total property for house Fences area of within Affected Length 1 Administr Woreda/kebele[to Name of the ownerlPAPs for ss.m for a Im the ROW Area[mZ) - (m)- No. 1 ative zone1 wn) - 1 Type of property (Houses) Houses Fences 780 Guragie Gumer/Arket NUREHASNE MUD HOUSE 24 10 1 -- 1 80652 AHMADE HASANE CIA 1 2,230 23 1 165 - MOSQUECOMPOUND Wooden fence/Mos? 47 00 1 lCuragleGumer/~rket ~WALDA wooden fence 784 1 - I

-~-

Wooden fence ------. MUD HOUSE C1D -- -- ~ ---- Wooden fence - - -- TUKUL 792 IGuragle LGumer/Arket IBlRU BABO _ MUD HOUSE lwooden fence -- 1 ! /ClF 1 630.00 1 795 Guragie Gumer/Arket / MULCA BABO 'C~E / 78020 I - 1 SO 796 Guragie Gumer/Arket_ icL-- ! 780.20 / - , SO /TUKUL . ..- - 797 Guragie GumerIArket IClF. ---630x ! 50 798 Guragie ;Gumer/Arket /wooden fence - I 799 LGuragie Gurner/Arket ... 1 Wooden fence - 7 I 800 lGuragie LGumer/~rket GEBERU GENFA ITUKUL --.--CIE , 780.20 1 .I

Gurag~e &er/Arket- -GEBERUGENFA TUKUL 801 -- ~Gurner/~rket

805 /Gurag~e 'Gumerl~rket AMERGAW/YESUI ~TUKUL 1 70000 50

806 lGuragle !Gumer/~rket - -& I -- - Wooden fence A I 1 . 1 I MUD HOUSE Wooden fence Wooden fence 47.00 1 - 810 IGuragle Gumer/~rket 'ASADA Y* 1 Wooden fence 1- 1~2~ - 4700) - - -. - -- - - 811 I~ura~le/Gumer/~rket I wooden fence I ICZD I - 47001 -- -. ------T - 7- 812 J~ura~leIGurner/~rket - HABETA- TASESE -- t C2D - 1 47001 - 813 Guragle Gumer/~rket HABETA TASESE C1E 1 1 780Z0 1 - _i- i ,BEZA--- jAMANE KEMALE- MUD HOUSE

Page 20 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost I I 1 I I I I 1 Cost I I I

within ROW A:ey$l; - 1 (m)- No. ative Zone Type of properry (Houses] Houses Fences -~ ------84 821 Guragie Gumer/Abeki AWALE Wooden fence -- 1 54 822 Guragie Gumer/Abeki MAKA TUKUL -- -

823 Curagie Gurner/Abeki MAKA Wooden fence -- 27 824 Guragie Gurner/Abeki AWALE Wooden fence 47.00 825 Curagie Gumer/Abeki /SERAFA Wooden fence 826 Cuagie Gurner/Kebul NASER ESMAL Wooden fence p~ 1 - 827 Curagie Gumer/Kebul HUSANE >TUKUL 1 CIE 828 !Curagie /Gumer/~ebul / FAKADA MOSAY 780.20 i / - 1 50 829 /Curagie l~umer/~ebul 1 BEHIRU i 780.20 1 - , - TADELA /MUD HOUSE SULTANE MOCHIEMED 1 T"KUL.- , 780.20 1 50 l Mosque i HADERA EBRHIME - 50 eLIT"KL--_p- - 834 Guragie Gumer/Kebul NASERE FRAGA lTUKUL -:T~-F$/ClE 780.20 28 835 Curagie Gumer/Kebul NASERE FWGA ITUKUL 1~1~Ip 780.20-- 836 Guragie Gumer/Kebul NASERU SERAGE /CIE I--+-zoo &-- 140 837 Guragie Gumer/Kebul JAMALE MUSA *---C~E , 78020 I 50 838 Guragie Gurner/Kebul !KAMALE~USA ~TUKUL 1 780.20 1 - 1 50 839 Curagie -Cumer/Kebul IKAMALE MUSA TUKUL .- I 630.00 1 - / 50 '

840 Curagie -l______Gumer/Kebul TYEBEMUSA TUKUL ~ +EL - ! 50 LAHMADENEYASENE TUKUL - IKADER MOCHIEMADE 1~~~HOUSE KAYERU MOCHIEMADE TUKUL SERURE BUSARE ~-jClD

AMEDY NUREY - TUKUL 847 1 Guragie !Gumer/~ebul AMZA JABERY I TK_ I JABER AUMARE TUKUL --- I MUD HOUSE 50 ~ ~ p-~ -7; TUKUL . -

TUKUL tI 780.20 I - i 56 . -- --

857 Guragie ~Gumer/~ebul AHMADE SEKURE 100 40 l --- .- 1 858 Guragie /Cumer/~ebul SAMESU MUD HOUSEAMADE --!MUD HOUSE I 700.00 1 - 42 -- --, -- 859 Guragle Gumer/Kebul~ ~MESUMUD HOUSEAMADE :MUD HOUSE .~C~DILOO.OO!I1-87I 100 1 87 I - T 200~53I - - -- 100 I -21-----

Page 21 of 35 Type of property

Page 22 of 35

ANNEX 8B: List ofAffected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost

I I I I I I I Cost 1 I I 1 1 I Cost I Eshrnate % of the 1 I I 1 Eshrnate for Total property for house Fences 1 area of withln Affected Length Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs Fences forsq rn for alrn the ROW Area(rn2) - [rn);; No ahve Zone wn) Name) I Type ofproperty Category floor area oflength House (Houses) 1 Houses 1 Fences -- -. -. -- 1 1 - ~TUKUL 944 ICuragle /Curner/~ebul 'RADEY HASANE __ HIE-___ -- 78020-- 1 945 ~Curagle BALE SEKURE Wooden fence H2D _-_ 4000 Fv-r I -. I 946 Guragle Curner/Kebul WABLE SEKURY 1 wooden fence 'HZD 40 00 1

.

SAMACA 40.00

BAHERU SEKURY- Wooden fence 1 wooden fence AHMADENY ITVKUL TUKUL HIE ; / 780.20 i - ! 50 Wooden fence -- i /H~D I 1 40.00 Wooden fence !H~D 1 40.00 /HZD 1 - 1 40.00 50 TUKUL

1 4000 ------WAzernet Berbere/M~SAMESU WELHSAFO Wooden fence I H2D 968 J~llte W Azernet Berbere/MI'AWEALE JABERY Wooden fence/SCHOOL I 1 H~D I -

969 Sllte - W Azernet Berbere/M! MUGO SCHOOL WIRE FENCE 1 1 H2C I 60 00 1 7- 970 S~lte W Azernet BerberejM! AHMADY WALECARADE IMUO HOUSE ;HID ~90000, 971 S~lte W Azernet Berbere/M~AHMADY MUDHOUSE I 900 00 , +-- 972 S~lte- W Azernet Berbere/M~SAMESU LALAMEDO Wooden H2D - 40 00 1 973 ,S~lte WAzernet Berbere/M~KAMALE SAYED /MUD HOUSE HID 900 00 27

900 00 2 1 7 1,200 00 29 MU0 HOUSE MUD HOUSE 37 90 JMUO HOUSE HID _?!?OO~j_-.i L- !?

Page 24 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con ensation cost I I I I I I I Cost I I I I *ofthe ~ : property I i within Affected Length Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs Fences for sq.m for a lm the ROW 1 Area(m2) - (m)- Cost Estimate 1 Cost Estirnatc NO. ative Zone_-wn) 1 i Name1 .. Type of property Category 1 floor area of length. House (Houses) I Houses 1 Fences for house for Fences ;oo IJ-.. 3365~~~-- W Azernet Berbere/MI/ NURY MUZAYEN MUDHOUSE -- - 1 35 35 ; -- - /HID I - HUSANE !MUD HOUSE I= 900 00 1 45 --7 1 ------I -- 987 / ~ilte w.Azernet B~~~~~~/M{ANEWAREENDAM~J [MUD.- HOUSE .. .-1--i . 900.00 1 : 1 36 988 ~ilte W.Azernet Berbere/M{ SERAGE SANY 1 M"~E.L (HID ! , 900.00 .~2

991 /Silte W.Azernet Berbere/M ~ABDURHMANE MUD HDUSE .-- 1 900.00 1 1 --37 992 /~ilte W.Azernet Berbere/M~REDONE YASEN tMUD HOUSE TH~D) 1~ 900.0~i 993 jsilte W.Azernet Berbere/Mt BELALA SAYEDY ;MUD HOUSE iHlD ) 900.00 [ : -- - - - 1 RADEY KAMALE MUD HOUSE IHIL.. 1 I 1.200.00 / . / 42 ABDULSAMADE ABEDALA I MUD HOUSE ~- IH~D I 1 900.00 1 I 996 Silte IwAzernet Berbere/M ABDULSAMADE ABEDALA /MUD HOUSE 900.00 / - 1 21 997 Silte / w.Azernet Berbere/Mt MOCHIEMADE SAMELO i MUD HOUSE 900.00 1 - 1 9 1--- 998 Silte I w.Azernet Berbere/Mt RAWEDA _ I MUD HOUSE er-1~~. 1 6 999 lsllte /MUD HOUSE 90000 - 1 -1 MUD HOUSE 1001 1 ~ilte 'w.Azernet Berbere/Md, BAHARU RASEDE .- MUD HOUSE 900.00 --40 -- 7 -. 1002 1 silte / w.Azernet Berbere/MI/ BAHARU RASEDY 1 Wooden fence - -- 40.00 1 -- 1003 lsilte W.Azernet B~~~~~~/M/BAHARURASEDY (MUD HOUSE iH?C. 1004 Isilte 1 WAzernet Brrbere/Mugo 1005 Silte- 1w.Azernet Berbere/M11BADERU Wooden fence ~HZD 40.00 ----~-- i 1--- ( 1006 ~ilte / ~AzernetB~~~~~~/MI/BADERu ITUKUL. HIE i ! 780.20 I - 1 50 SALEYAWOO~~~fence --- 1 1~2~I 40.00 - 1008 Silte --ioznce-. ._L /HzD L---- 1 40.00 1 1009 1 silte 1 w.Azernet Berbere/MI/ MUZAMELY NURY ITUKUL -7- 1010 ~ilte w.Azernet AUSMALE /TUKUL 780.20 I 1 / B~~~~~~/MI/GAHARE -. - lHlE 1 --

TUKUL

50 1015 Silte jw.Azernet Berbere/M{SEFA SAMNO -.. /HIE I 1 780.20 1 - 100 1016 ~ilte 1 w.Azernet Berbere/MI/ SEKURE SAMNO ~ I / -- -- lHlE 1 780.20 i - 1 50 r--- loo - ,

-~.

i~ilte w.Azernet MALEKE TUKUL ! 780.20 - ' 50 50- 1021 i B~~~~~~/M/ABEDULE --.~HIE 1 +---i loo r 1022 Silte I ~.~~erne~B~~~~~~/M~ABEDULE MALEKE _ TUKUL !HIE ~ 780 20 13

1023 ~ilte !W.Azernet Berbere/~(sA~E~EADAME TUKUL .~ ~ :HIE i 780.20 , ~-50 i ------1024 silte . /w.~zernetB~~~~~~IMI~SADEKE ADAM.E uu . 1 - 780.20+. I - 67

lo=-- 1 W.Azernet prbere/Mt, SAREFE SEKURE TUKUL ~ ~ HIF - -630001- -- -50 ,ensation cost

1 Cost 1 Estimate 1 % ofthe 1 i within I Affected Length

wn) -... . Name) Type of property

780.20 . 780.20 HIE 1 780.20

HID - --

TUKUL TUKUL

TUKUL HIE 780.20 ----

TuKuL.. - - .. 780.20 1 ~ -~ W.Azernet Berbere/B~MUDASERY MOCHIEMADE MUD HOUSE 900.00 1 28 l~oodenfence H2D 40100 ~ TUKUL /HIE 780.20 83 1040 Silte w.~zernetBerbere/B~ BANURY SALEY MUD HOUSE ___- 'HID- I 90000 ! . .-50 1041 Silte w.~zernetB~~~~~~/BE/sAFENY NASERY ~- - Wooden fence - i 40.00 ~ HZD 1042 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/BE! RASEDY BASANEY- ~TUKUL H1F I 630.00 : - 50 780 20 13

TUKUL MUD HOUSE MUD HOUSE

1055 !~llte 1 ~AzernetBerbere/BdMud house^ AHMED MUD HOUSE 1 H~C 1 1,20000 i - 1 1056 l~llte ~AzernetBerbere/B~ MUDESIR ISSA ___ MUD HOUSE I 900001 . 1

W Azernet Berbere/B~lELFATA ALEY YDHOUSE B~~ZAMELEANEWAR TUKULJMosque C-- MUZAMEAE ANEWAR~UKUL H1F 1 63000 ,

HIE 780 20

900 00 - i- MUD HOUSE lHlD 90000 1 41

Page 26 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con ensation cost I I I I I I I 1 Cost j I I I- Estimate % of the 1 Estimate ( for Total property for house Fencer ( area of within Affected 1 Length Cost Esimate Cost Estimate 1 Administr Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs fences 1 f0rsq.m fora lm the Area(m2;; (4- No. ative zone ) (Houses) Houses Fences for house for Fences wn) Name) - Type ofproperty 1 category/ category[ floor area of length.; House 48,807.00 1067 l~ilte 1 w.Azernet Berbere/Be/ SANI ABDU MUD HOUSE HID 900.00 54 --Ro:oo -- 1 / / I 39.220.65 1068 lsilte I w.Azernet Berbere/BrlN~~ER&BADERU TUKUL/Mosque ~HIE ) - 1 780.201 - I 50 100 -- W.Azernet Berbere/BeI NASERY IAMALE TUKUL /HIE 100 j 50 39,220.65 40.00 106 4,230.00 Wooden fence/Mosque HZD - - - 1071 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/B YASUFE JAMALE _MUDHOUSE/Mosque / 900.00 1 1 66 100 66 75 59,517.00 *W.kernet Berbe*E JAMALE [MUD HOUSE 100 12 10,494.00

1073 Silte ~~zernetBerbere/B~! RAHMATA I H7.D 1 .

1074 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Be MEFTA JAMALE Wooden fence -. HZD ! 40.00 . -

1075 Silte W.Azernet B~~~~~~/B~/SAMELEAMANE Wooden fence IH~D 1 /-- 40.00 1 1076 Silte Lw.Azernet Berbere/Be SAMELE AMANE 1 wooden fence 1 IHZD I - j 40.00 ! 1077 Silte ~.~zernetBerbere/Be JAMALE SAYED TUKUL 780.20 1 -2 1078 Silte ) w.Azernet Berbere/Bc; HASANE DAWEDE -. ITUKUL 1-C'"

I 1082 w Azernet B~&~~~/BEZAYNYAHUSANE TUKUL -- 780 20 I 50 4S1Ite*erbere/Bd KADER -- I -- - j 780.20 1 - 50

-~

--- ...

W.Azernet Berbere/Br WabiLA Wooden fence TUKUL

Wooden fence TUKUL -- -. .- --

TUKUL .. T%!p-- 630.00 w.AZernet B~~~~~~/BE~ANUARE Wooden fence -.. -- -.- IHZD ::;i ~ ;;;;: ' W.Azernet Berbere/B~HARE= 1 Wooden fence 40.0° 1

' & Silte [WAzernet Berbere/Br/DORA ABEDU _ 7TUKUL' -- ~ -. HIE ' 789.E 1 ..I-- L106 Silte _ w.Azernet Berbere/BJ SEKURA-- . -- - TUKUL ! . HIE i - 41 I -1- : 780.20I-. L __ !07f Sfi _ /~.AzernetBerbere/BelsHER~~ JUHARE-- .TUKk... - .I;HIE 780.20 ! - 50 ~

Page 27 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost I I I I I I I i Cost I II I I II I / Cost / Estimate % of the 1 i Estimate for Total property I Fences area of within Affected Length Name of the owner(PAPs / Houses Fences 1 forfor house sq.m for a Im I the ROW Area(m2) - (m)- Cost Estimate Cost Estimate NO. lativezone, wn) 1 ate1 to floor area of length. House (Houses) Houses Na~e] Type of propeq - for house rces 1108 Silte w.~zernet~erberej~c; NASERU AHMADE H2D 40.00 11 3.771.60 .-r I 1109 Sllte W.Aze~Berbere/BelSAMELE KIYARE TUKUL H1F 630.00 .

1110 Silte ,~.~zernet~erbere/E%E%H~~~so BUSARE _P-~!HlE / 780.20 / - - 11Asiilte -W.Azernet BerberejBr SANEGARO NASERO TUKUL !HIE 780.20 i - -- +--- 1112 Siite W.Azernet Berberejsa UNKNOWN TUKuL 780.20 I -HIE - 1113 Silte W.Azernet Berberejsa UNKNOWN TUKUL HrT--- 780.20 / - 1114 Silte W.Azernet Berberejsa AMEN HUSANE ITUKUL-- HIE 1 1 780.20 / - 50 -100 50 -11 15 Silte W.Azernet Berberejsa SURURE SHI HASSEN ITUKUL /HIE 1 780.20 81 ---100 81 50 63,547.29 1116 Silte._- W.Azernet Berberejsa SURURE SHl HASSEN TUKUL HIE 1 780.20 - 55 100 55 50 42,567.71 1117 Silte W.Azernet Berberejsa AREGA BASERY MUD HOUSE ,HID i 900.00 - 32 -100 32 --1118 Silte W.Azernet Berberejsa MOHAMED AWEL TUKUL HIE / 780.20 7 5 100 75 58,202.92 1119 Silte WetBerberejsa MOHAMED AWEL 630.00 - 38 100 38 24.147.90 TUKUL ~_ H1F .~ _ 1 1120 Silte W.Azernet Berberejsa BAREGEHO ADAME -- Wooden fence H2D - 40.00 1 25 1,018.40 1121 Suite Iw-~zernetBerberejsa BAREGEHO ADAME wooden fence /H~D 1 40.00 -- 119 1 746.00 1122 Silte W.Azernet Berberejsa ANSARE MADEY Wooden fence I /H~D 40.00

1123 Siite---.- -W.Azernet Berberejsa YASUFE ABESERU Wooden fence IH~D 40.00 -

1124 /Silte . W.Azernet Berberea AYREDU ADAM !wooden fence 40.00 .- - - 23 927.20 -. - 1125 Silte l Wooden fence - 40.00 52 2,096.40 - -_ - 1126 lsilte 780.20 / - 35 -100 35 27,182.17 I 85 100 , 85 1 - TUKUL/WOODEN FENCE 33 100 33 1 50 25,910.44 2.010.80 TUKUL . 63 100 - 63 49,160.40 I . 40.00 I 45 1.808.40 38 1.500.00 I HIF iTUKuL -- 50 31 --31,670.10 W.Azernet Berberejsa' DELABO ESMALE ,l Wooden fence , 24 950.00 1 W.Azernet Berberejsa AREGA JUHARE Wooden fence --- 36 1.440.40 Wooden fence HZD 29 1,170.00 I TUKUL HIE 780.20 1 50 1 1 - -- -

Page 28 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost rlI ! I Cost I I I I

I i Name of the owner(PAPs Cost Estimate j Cost Estimatc Type of property for house for Fences Nam~) [ -v-~ I MUD HOUSE IM~DE!!sE- . -- ! MUD HOUSE .- 12,2404 1152 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Le BAREKADA LORATO MUD HOUSE 1 1,200.00 1153 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Le LALAMO BAREGEHO MUD HOUSE 1.200.00 pppp 1154 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Le DAREMOLO AMEZA MUD HOUSE 1155 Silk w~zernetBerbere/LeI MUD HOUSEABA DATAMO MUD HOUSE 14

--1156 Silte - W.Azernet Berbere/Le MOCHIEMADE I 900.00 25 1157 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Le SUMAGA HAMEZA MUD HOUSE-_--- , 900.00 25 (woodenfence -- MUD H?SE/Waoden fence 25 MUD HOUSE 17 1161 lsilte 1 W.Azernet Berbere/LeI METEKU BOGALA MU0 HOUSE -- IH~B/ i 2.200.00 I - 1 [II 1162 Silte I ~.~zernetBerbere/Le NASERO AHMADEN (MUD HOUSE 1163 Silte I ~.~zernetBerbere/Le SAEFA =HOUSE 1164 Silte -(W.Azerns=bere/~e BELETE DEREJU -7lhlUDHO~s~

1,200.00

- MUD HOUSE !HlC I MUD HOUSE -~ MUD HOUSE 18 11721w.~zern MUD HOUSE-____ /H~C I -1173 /~ilte ,;w.~zern 'MUD HOUSE .--

1Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Le/EBRAHEM HALELE - IMUD HOUSE 1174 I -- 1175 1 SilL-/ w.~zernetBerbere/LelJ~= MUD HOUSE/Wooden fence I 1176 Silte- W.Azernet Berbere/Le/ REDWANE 1 16 1177 Silte ' W.Azernet B~~~~~~/L~,~MAKUREYA W.Azernet Berberej~e__.I ZEMETA ARESADO 279 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Le( LAMASEBO 1180 Silte ~.~zernetB~~~~~~/L~AKMALE AHEADENE TUKUL - 1181 Silte W.Azernet Berbere/Le ELE YASENY

I 40.00

Wooden fence

~~

~ --~~ Ip188 Isiite ~.~ze~e~~&~bere/Leratown 1 wooden fence H~D ! ------.. .-. .. - - -- T~~1

1189 Sllte W.Azer"et Berbere/Le&~K~SY AGARE MuDH!?!~sESESESE IHlD ~ _ 100 I .~- a 1

Page 29 of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con !nsation cost I I i I I I I I Cost I I Cost Estimate -?hof the I Estnate for Total ~roperty for house Fences area of within Affected Administr I Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs / Fences 1 f0rsq.m 1 fora Im the ROW Area(m2) - (mi- I Name) No. ative zone Type of property-- category Category floor area of!?ngth.l House Houses) Houses Fences 1 1 wnl- I / / I -- 1190 Silte W.Azernet BerberefLe~ALlX AREGA -- MUD HOUSE/HEOCE HID 900.00 1 55 I 1191 Silte Iw~zernetBerbere/Le UNKNOWN 1 wooden fence IHzD - 40.00 .- -..I- - 1 1 Bereber /C(SAMANEKASA 1 90000 - 1 11 780 20 B~~~~~~/C~SAMANEUSA _ --- --4 - 1 36 Bereber /C/ARATO SAYED ITUKUL_ 1 HIF 1 630.00 / - 1 50 I I /C SERGAGA HUSANE ~TUKUL ______H~F 1 630.00 1 - 1 1196 lsllte WfAzernet Bereber ~CSERGAGAHUSAS - wooden fence IH2D - 1197 1111~ lW/Azernet Bereber /IMUKESENE SEKUR -;~uI;= H1C 1 1.20000 1 HID 1 900.00 / 10

HZD 1 -. - .- -40.00-- HZD

--- .. .

~-.HlF -. . . 7 630.00 1 - I 1205 Sllte /w/Azernet ~ereber/L(BASER MUZAYEN HID 90000 1 - 1206 /Sllte I~/~zernetBereber /I:FGAME ITUKUL _.- LH'E- _,- 2E!i

1207 l~adi~~~erno/shurumo ELMUSE SEKURYA Wooden fence ~ -- -~,-1 - a BARAKA AMANZ-.-*~~~- 1

1209 1 ~ad~ya ~erno/shurumn 'AWEL SHAFI Iwooden fence I

- 0 ad~emo/shurumo AWEL SHAFI -- - Iwaaden fence 4000 1 - 1211 Had~ya Lemo/shururno IRAHEMATO MOSE 1 40001 !wooden fence - 40.00 1 -. .. - ..- .- . -.- - -- . -

!HlE j 50 MUD HOUSE /HID 900 00 16 /HID I 1 90000 1 780.20 1 Wooden fence 1 40.00 -.-- - - .. -- IHZD I

l~erno~shururnnMANAYE MUDHOUSE

jLerno/shurumo_ _,TAMERATt - - tHIC 1,200 00 +- ,

Page 30 of 35

ANNEX 8B: List ofAffected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and com~ensationcost I 1 Cost Estimate %of the I I Estimate for I i I Cost Estimate ( Cost Estimate Type of property Category Category floor area of length. House (Houses) Houses Fences for house for Fences - , 40.00 22 100 / 22 40.00 37 1.479.20 I 28 100 28 22.025.05 , 40.00 28 / 1.129.20 -. . - .-. :Wooden fence ! 23 1 936.40 1 wooden fence 1,000.80 - 25 100 i 25 22.752.00 I Wooden fence ' 40.00 25 - 1,016.80 I wooden fence H2D ~ - j 40.00 2 3 930.80 -, .------1 wooden fence IH~D 1 900.00 - I 20 ------. - H2D 40.00 T 1 38 1,532.40 _J - 'H~D - 40.00 1 -- -- I 24 942.40 Wooden fence I H2D 1 - ! 40.00 / 32 1 1.298.40 Wooden fence 35 1.385.20 2 5 991.60 42.731.55

HzD---- - 35 1.385.20 100 9 -8,064.00 1 Wooden fence -- 36 1,423.60 -- 46 1,845.20 40.00 39 1.554.80 .------. -

lWooden fence 'wooden fence Wooden fence 1,06680 Wooden fence I HZD 40 00 45 1.787 20 MUD HOUSE/Wooden fence 1.720 00

MUD HOUSE/Wooden fence Wooden fence

---1 MUD HOUSE HIC 1 2oo.00 HOUSE 900.00 100 40,3680027,990.00 -- HID 1 '3 100 -___ 1 7 1I I "31 1 1 MUD HOUSE 14,697.00 - . ~-. J1D~- --! . .L-_9~0.00-A - 16 l"--X,

Page 32 of 35

ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and con lensation cost I I I I I I I Cost I I I II I Cost j ~stimate/ %of the 1 Estimate for for house I Fences I area of / ~dministr Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs I Houses Fences 1 f0rsq.m ! fora lm / the No. 1 ative Zone 1 Name) Type of property category category / floor are4- of length. House (Houses) Houses Fences -.-- wn) 1 1 MUD HOUSE -+ Wooden fence - - - Wooden fence I 40 00 1357 l~adi~a I~emo/~osainaTOW? JMELKAMUTADESE JMUDHOUSE JHIC 1 1,200.00 / 19

1361 Hadiya Lerno/Hosa~naTown ~~ETEARGAWE Wooden fence H2D - 1 40.00 1 1362 Hadiya Lemo/Hosa~naTown-~EDE G/SELASE MUD HE!- 900.00 1 55 1363 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town ITADESE GEBERE Wooden fence _IHL H2D - 1 40.00 ~- 1364 Hadiya Lerno/Hosaina Town AYELECH GOGOLO BLD lHlB 2,200.00 1 38 1365 Hadiya !Lerno/Hosaina Town AYELECH GOGOLO Corrugated iron sheet fence H2B - 1 50.00 1366 ,Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town AYELECEEO / ~asonaryfence H2A - 1 167.50 1 - 1367 Hadiya I~emo/~osaina own AYELECH GOGOLOI HIB I 1368 Hadiya ~emo/~osainaTown KASA SAM=- __ /HlC 1,200.00 =&-1369 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town , KASA SAMRO [P~~HOUSE IH~C 1370 Hadiya , Lemo/Hosaina Town /GAZHNE ARBATO Corrugated iron sheet fence i H2B - 50.00 1 1371 Hadiya ILemo/Hosaina Town- W/MARIYAM DUNEY I BLD H1A 3.400.00 - 1 24 1372 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town GASU GUNBESO BLD H1B 2,200.00 - 1 14 1373 Hadiya Lpmo/Hosaina Town BERHANU ANAGO BLD H1B 1 2.200.00 43 1374 Hadiya - Lemo/Hosaina Town KASU TERAGO BLD H1A 3,400.00 9 1375 Had~ya Lemo/Hosaina Town ABEDY YASEN 1! BLD __- _ __ 2,200.00 - I 2 ??!L ~- 1376 Had& Lemo/Hosaina Town TADASA ASABO iBLD - ! H1B , 2,200.00 2 1377 Hadiya ILemo/~osaina own ~TAFASAZALAKA ~BLD H1A

1378 Hadiya ?ieL/~osaina- ~TAFASAZALAKA I BLD H1A 3,400.00 1 +- own 4- ' ' 1379 Hadiya ~erno/~osaina own KEDNA BASA BLD H1A 3.400.00 . I 11 1380 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town GERMA NUNA MUD HOUSE lH1B 2.200.00 18 1381 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town AWAKA WANDEMU MUD HOUSE - /HID 900.00 5 1382 Hadiya Lerno/Hosaina Town ;JABERY HUSANE MUD HOUSE / H~C 1.200.00 5 I 1383 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town {TEAALAMU - MUD HOUSE 1 HlC 1.200.00 2

~ - 1384 Hadiya Lerno/Hosaina Town !NEGUSA --MUD HOUSE 1 H~C 1 1,200.00 5 1385 Hadiya Lerno/Hosaina Town SALOMN YETATKU MUD HOUSE H1C 1,200.00 2 1386 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town 'BAZABEH TASOMA Wooden fence H2D 40.00 13 1387 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town W/EYASUSE AHAMO MUDHOUSE H1B 2,200.00 - 1388 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town SANGARU MOCHlEMADE ~BLD H1B 17200.00 - 29 1389 Hadiya Lerno/Hosaina Town ABABA BASERY MUD HOUSE H1B 2.200.00 54 1390 Hadiya Lerno/Hosaina=n ABABA BASERY Wooden fence H2D 40.00 22 1391 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town MUD HOUSE H 1C 1,200.00 9 MUD HOUSE IHIC 1,200.00 2 MUD HOUSE HIE 2.200.00 - 1- 13 /HIC 1,200.00 / - 7 5

Page 34of 35 ANNEX 88: List of Affected persons, institutions who loss houses and fences and compensation cost I I I I I I i 1 Cost 1 II I 1 Cost 1 ~stimatei Estimate for Total for house Fences area of Length Administr Woreda/kebele(to Name of the owner(PAPs ROW / Area(m2) - Cost Estimate i Cost Estimate No. ative Zone for :p;f;oo for Fences -~ ---wn) 1 1 1395 Hadiya Lemo/Hosaina Town

BLD .------SHEET METAL HOUSE

Wooden fence ..---. Wooden fence -- 1 Masonary fence . I - / 167.50 / --

Page 35 of 35

ANNEX 9

Responses to Comments

1. Acronyms

Review the list of acronyms, as some are missing; eg. HIVIAIDS

Response

Reviewed

2. Main findings

a) Please present the main findings in a martrixltable form b) Change total number of project affected people, to project affected persons c) Loss of land is not mentioned in the RAP budget; although land cannot be bought in Ethiopia, please mention how much land will be lost and that colnpensation will be in kind d) Incorporate the entitlement matrix in the main findings

Response

A) findings presented in matrix form b) Changed to project affected persons c) Loss of land is mentioned in RAP budget D) Incorporated

3. 3.1.13 The World Bank Resettlement Policy

Change operational policy (OP) 4.30 to OP 4.12 and delete all other references to OP 4.30. The text seems to refer to OD. 4.30

Response

Change to OP 4.12

4. 3.2.2 Legislation on Expropriation of Land and Compensation

a) Incorporate from proclamation 4551205, quotation of section two. Article 7, no 3 referring particularly to eviction for public use b) lncorporate reference to Regulation No. 13512007 which refer to the application of 4551205

Response

A) 455/2005 referring eviction is quoted and

b) Regulation No 135/2007 is incorporated

5. 4.1 The RAP disclosure

The description is confused, please review. for instance, disclosure is first carried out in the country, before it is done at the World Bank Info-shop. The consultant should ask the ERA for a good RAP reference regarding the description of the disclosure process.

Response

Disclosure is done.

6. 6.3.1.1 Land Loss

Please specify, in the mitigation measures, that land cannot be bought in Ethiopia and that loss of land will be compensated in kind.

Response

Mitigation measure is specified.

7. Table 6.3 - Summary of houses affected along the road

Please specify the number of houses that are fully affected and the nuinber of houses that are partially affected.

Response

Houses of fully affected and partially affected are specified.

8. Loss of grazing land

Please specify - How come that certain families will lose grazing land, when

a) grazing land is communal and b) the road work mainly acquire strips of land along the road. what is the source of loss of grazing land, and why are only some families affected?

Response

Discussed and responded. Regarding the communal grazing land, experience shows that there has never been any compensation for communal grazing land since the ownership of land belongs to Government and the public.

9. Table 6.21 Summary of Total Affected Assets

Include loss of land in the table

Response

Included.

10. 7.4 Compensation Eligibility

This section should include a paragraph on the cut off date. When was the cut off date? If in doubt of what a cut off date is, see OP. 4.12.

Response

Cut-off day is included.

11. 7. Compensation Framework

a) Incorporate a section on Method of Valuation of Affected Assets - The section should describe the various methods1 basis for valuation used to value the lost assets, e.g., replacement cost, gross current replacement cost, or income restoration. For each category of loss, e.g. land, business, perennial crops or trees, grazing land, present the valuation method used. If in doubts, of what to do, the consultant should ask ERA for help. ERA could provide the consultant with a reference RAP that has a good valuation section, e.g. Anl

Response

Method of Valuation of Affected assets are included.

12. 7.5.5 Vulnerable Households

Please specify, what kind of special assistance will be given to vulnerable households, in kind, in monetary compensation and or both

Response It is discussed.

13. Annex with Amharic text

Please put English titles on the text, show what they are, minutes or ?

Response Corrected.