Meltzer Dissertation FINAL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meltzer Dissertation FINAL Maternal Citizens: Gender and Women’s Activism in the United States, 1945-1960 By Paige L. Meltzer B.A., Hamilton College, 1998 A.M., Binghamton University, State University of New York, 2001 A.M., Brown University, 2004 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May 2010 © Copyright 2010 by Paige L. Meltzer This dissertation by Paige L. Meltzer is accepted in its present form by the Department of History as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Recommended to the Graduate Council Date ____________ ___________________________________ Mari Jo Buhle, Avisor Date ____________ ___________________________________ Elliott Gorn, Reader Date ____________ ___________________________________ Robert Self, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date ____________ ___________________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School iii Paige L. Meltzer, Curriculum Vitae May 11, 1976, Rochester, New York Education Brown University, Providence, RI Ph.D. Candidate, Department of History; Spring 2010 M.A. in U.S. History; Spring 2004 Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY M.A. in U.S. Women’s History; Winter 2001 Hamilton College, Clinton, NY B.A. with honors in History and German; Spring 1998 Magna Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa Goethe Institute, Murnau, Germany; Winter 1997 University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Spring 1997 Awards University Dissertation Fellowship, Brown University; Fall 2008 Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women Dissertation Grant, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University; Summer 2007 to Summer 2008 Women’s History and Resource Center Research Grant, General Federation of Women’s Clubs; Summer 2006 to Summer 2007 University Travel Fellowship, Brown University; Fall 2006 to Spring 2007 Summer Enrichment Grant, Brown University; Summer 2004 to Summer 2006 Graduate Education Award, Binghamton University; Fall 1999 to Fall 2000 University Summer Award, Binghamton University; Summer 2000 Teaching Experience Lecturer, History and Literature Program, Harvard University; Fall 2009 to present Instructor, “U.S. History since 1877,” History Department, University of Rhode Island; Summer 2007 Co-Instructor, “U.S. Women’s History through Popular Culture, 1945 to the present,” Summer Studies, Brown University; Summer 2007 Teaching Assistant, History Department, Brown University; Fall 2004 to Spring 2006; Fall 2007 to Spring 2008; Spring 2009 “European History, 1789-1989,” Prof. Joan Richards; Spring 2008, Spring 2009 “European Intellectual History, 1880-1914,” Prof. Mary Gluck; Fall 2007 “The Vietnam War,” Prof. Andrew Huebner; Spring 2005, Spring 2006 “Modern U.S. History through Film,” Profs. Andrew Huebner and Robert Fleegler; Summer 2005 “European Intellectual History, 1914 to present,” Prof. Mary Gluck; Fall 2005 “Modern European Women’s History,” Prof. Carolyn Dean; Fall 2004 iv Teaching Assistant, History Department, Binghamton University; Fall 1999 to Spring 2000 “American Civilization, Post-1877,” Prof. Kathryn Kish Sklar; Spring 2000 “The Great Depression,” Inst. Michelle Kuhl; Fall 1999 Publications “‘The Pulse and Conscience of America:’ The General Federation and Women’s Citizenship in the Postwar Era,” forthcoming Winter 2010 with Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies Presentations “Defending a Mother’s Prerogative: Gendered Citizenship and Women’s Political Culture in the 1950s” presented to “Researching New York,” SUNY Albany; Fall 2007 “Gendered Citizenship: Women’s Political Culture in 1950s America” presented to the James A. Barnes Club Conference, Temple University; Spring 2007 Panel Commentator at “The Academic in Public Life” Interdisciplinary Graduate Student Conference, Brown University; Spring 2005 “Defending a Mother’s Prerogative: Anti-Fluoridationist Women in New York City, 1955-1965” presented to “Gender Across Borders” Interdisciplinary Graduate Student Conference, Brown University; Spring 2005 Professional Service Graduate Advisor, Brown Journal of History, History Department, Brown University; Fall 2006 to Spring 2009 Chair, Interdisciplinary Graduate Student Conference, “Space as a Category of Analysis: New Perspectives,” Brown University; Spring 2005 to Spring 2006 Department Liaison, History Graduate Student Association, History Department, Brown University; Spring 2005 to Spring 2006 Department Representative, Graduate Student Council, Brown University; Fall 2006 to Spring 2007 Graduate Advisor to Undergraduate Studies, Office of Undergraduate Studies, History Department, Binghamton University; Fall 2000 v Acknowledgements I would like to extend my appreciation to the primary funders of this project, Brown University’s Graduate School and the Department of History. Special thanks also goes to the Arthur and Elizabeth Schlesinger Library on the History of Women at Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University for supporting my work with a dissertation award, and to their archivists for assisting in my research. I would like to convey my deep gratitude to the leadership and staff involved with the Women’s History and Resource Center at the General Federation of Women’s Clubs. This project would not have been possible without their financial support as well as the generosity of time, energy, and collegiality shown in particular by archivists Danielle Snyder, Gail McCormick, and Ashley Carver. My additional appreciation to the archivists at the Abraham Lincoln Library; Gannett-Tripp Library, Elmira College; the Indiana State Library and the Indiana Historical Society; the Long Island Studies Institute, Hofstra University; the New York City Hall Library and the New York Public Library; and the staff at Brown University’s Rockefeller and Hay libraries, among others. I also offer my sincere gratitude to the clubwomen who spoke with me about their early years in the GFWC during the 1950s: Merle Allen, Molly Deignan, Jo Dukes, Sylvia Kimmel, Dottie Mitchell, Patricia Mueller, and Betty Reiwarts. This project owes many intellectual debts to my mentors. Mari Jo Buhle, Elliott Gorn, and Robert Self made for a diverse committee that challenged my arguments about vi gender, political culture, and postwar America while offering productive guidance. Because of their involvement, the project has evolved tremendously since the outset. But because of their involvement, I can also see and am excited about all the ways the project will continue to evolve moving forward. I feel incredibly fortunate to have been part of the final cohort of Mari Jo Buhle’s students before her retirement. She has trained an impressive generation of scholars and my colleagues and I are very proud to have shared in this moment in her career. I move on to the next phase of my career with her lessons in academic rigor and her commitment to women’s history anchoring my work. Thank you, Mari Jo. Although this project began after our time together ended, I would like to thank Kitty Sklar, whose ideas about womanhood and citizenship profoundly shape the historian I am today. Thank you also to Carolyn Dean, who taught me how to teach students to think about gender. And Joan Richards, whose support got me through the final stages of my dissertation and the early stages of motherhood. I would also like to express my appreciation to Gayle Gullett and the anonymous peer reviewers for Frontiers who read an article based on parts of this work. Their comments pushed this project in entirely unexpected and beneficial ways. Thank you to my writing group: Lara Couturier, Natalina Earls, Nicole Eaton, Jessica Foley, Christopher Jones, and Stacie Taranto. I derived so much more from our collaboration than just constructive criticism and intellectual growth. I cherish the laughter, frustration, rewarding conversations, and friendship we have shared these last few years. Additional thanks goes to my fellow graduate students, especially Erik vii Anderson, Christopher Brick, Mark Robbins, and Gabe Rosenberg, who created an unfailingly stimulating environment. And a sincere thank you to Andrew Lewis for being a trusted friend and advisor through it all. Thank you to friends and family who have watched all of this unfold, who have offered well wishes and encouragement. My work has been possible because there was never a doubt of support – from my family, from my in-laws, from my girlfriends. Anything that needed to happen to make everything come together, you helped make happen. I must say a special thank you to my mother, Hannah Whittaker, whose long and frequent grandmother visits this year gave me the free time I needed to focus on finishing; I am grateful (as always) to her and my father Paul for the love and guidance they have given us. The same sentiment extends to Toni and Jeff Meltzer for their care of and devotion to our family. To all the grandparents: we appreciate everything. Thank you Zoe for keeping everything in perspective for me, for being so joyful, and for bringing us so much joy. Welcoming you into the world has been the most amazing experience. And for everything I am in awe of my partner and husband, Andy, who has never doubted me, or the path we have chosen. I am honored. Thank you. viii Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………. vi Chapter One Introduction: Maternalism and the General Federation of Women’s Clubs……………………………………………………….1 Chapter Two Homemaker Professionalization: Training Clubwomen in Postwar Citizenship…………………………………………………..46
Recommended publications
  • Give Me Liberty!
    CHAPTER 18 1889 Jane Addams founds Hull House 1898 Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Women and Economics 1900 Theodore Dreiser’s Sister Carrie 1901 President McKinley assassinated Socialist Party founded in United States 1902 President Theodore Roosevelt assists in the coal strike 1903 Women’s Trade Union League founded 1904 Lincoln Steffen’s The Shame of the Cities Ida Tarbell’s History of the Standard Oil Company Northern Securities dissolved 1905 Ford Motor Company established Industrial Workers of the World established 1906 Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle Pure Food and Drug Act Meat Inspection Act Hepburn Act John A. Ryan’s A Living Wage 1908 Muller v. Oregon 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire Society of American Indians founded 1912 Theodore Roosevelt organizes the Progressive Party Children’s Bureau established 1913 Sixteenth Amendment ratified Seventeenth Amendment ratified Federal Reserve established 1914 Clayton Act Ludlow Massacre Federal Trade Commission established Walter Lippmann’s Drift and Mastery 1915 Benjamin P. DeWitt’s The Progressive Movement The Progressive Era, 1900–1916 AN URBAN AGE AND A THE POLITICS OF CONSUMER SOCIETY PROGRESSIVISM Farms and Cities Effective Freedom The Muckrakers State and Local Reforms Immigration as a Global Progressive Democracy Process Government by Expert The Immigrant Quest for Jane Addams and Hull House Freedom “Spearheads for Reform” Consumer Freedom The Campaign for Woman The Working Woman Suffrage The Rise of Fordism Maternalist Reform The Promise of Abundance The Idea of Economic An American
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable Reproducible Ebooks
    Downloadable Reproducible eBooks Thank you for purchasing this eBook from www.socialstudies.com or www.writingco.com. To browse more eBook titles, visit http://www.socialstudies.com/ebooks.html To learn more about eBooks, visit our help page at http://www.socialstudies.com/ebookshelp.html For questions, please e-mail [email protected] Free E-mail Newsletter–Sign up Today! To learn about new eBook and print titles, professional development resources, and catalogs in the mail, sign up for our monthly e-mail newsletter at http://socialstudies.com/newsletter/ “The“The HardestHardest Struggle”Struggle” Women and Sweated Industrial Labor A Unit of Study for Grades 7-12 Eileen Boris Rita Koman ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS AND THE N ATIONAL CENTER FOR HISTORY IN THE SCHOOLS U NIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES For information on additional teaching units contact: The National Center for History in the Schools History Department University of California, Los Angeles 6265 Bunche Hall 405 Hilgard Avenue Los Angeles, California 90095-1473 (310) 825-4702 FAX: (310) 267-2103 [email protected] Web site: http://nchs.ucla.edu Cover photo: Garment workers parading on May Day, 1916, New York, New York Library of Congress: LC-USZ62-41871 Copyright © 2002, Organization of American Historians and The Regents, University of California First Printing, April, 2002 Permission is hereby granted to reproduce and distribute this publication for educational and research purposes, except for the limitations as set forth below. This publication also contains certain materials separately copyrighted by others. All rights in those materials are reserved by those copyright owners, and any reproduction of their materials is governed by the Copyright Act of 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • She Shot Him Dead: the Criminalization of Women and the Struggle Over Social Order in Chicago, 1871-1919
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2017 She Shot Him Dead: The Criminalization of Women and the Struggle over Social Order in Chicago, 1871-1919 Rachel A. Boyle Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Boyle, Rachel A., "She Shot Him Dead: The Criminalization of Women and the Struggle over Social Order in Chicago, 1871-1919" (2017). Dissertations. 2582. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2582 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2017 Rachel A. Boyle LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO SHE SHOT HIM DEAD: THE CRIMINALIZATION OF WOMEN AND THE STRUGGLE OVER SOCIAL ORDER IN CHICAGO, 1871-1919 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY RACHEL BOYLE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2017 Copyright by Rachel Boyle, 2017 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I am profoundly grateful for the honor of participating in the lively academic community in the History Department at Loyola University Chicago. I am especially grateful to my dissertation advisor, Timothy Gilfoyle, for his prompt and thorough feedback that consistently pushed me to be a better writer and scholar. I am also indebted to Elliott Gorn, Elizabeth Fraterrigo, and Michelle Nickerson who not only served on my committee but also provided paradigm-shifting insight from the earliest stages of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • City Beautiful, Hull-House, and the Emergence of American Internationalism, 1890-1920
    When Europe Re-Built the Neighbourhood: City Beautiful, Hull-House, and the Emergence of American Internationalism, 1890-1920 by Maureen A. Mahoney A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2014, Maureen A. Mahoney ABSTRACT Alice Hamilton, Grace Abbott, and Frederic C. Howe were members of a well-educated, white middle-class that burgeoned around the turn-of-the-century in the United States, and they embraced “Progressivism” and pacifism. In the flow of people, ideas, and culture that criss- crossed the North Atlantic, creating the intricate networks that formed an “international consciousness,” Hamilton, Abbott, and Howe were also deeply involved. In Chicago and Cleveland, however, their encounters with European culture were informed by shifting conventions of gender. At Hull-House in Chicago, Hamilton and Abbott observed the social transformations induced by mass immigration, and were forced to admit their education was not directly relevant. Drawing upon pragmatism and feminism, they learned to emphasize the subjectivity of experience, to view culture as a cooperative balance of diverse values, and to conceive of identity and knowledge as products of social and historic circumstances rather than innate racial or ethnic categories. By using these principles, they came to perceive American and European domestic spaces as two parts of an inclusive community. In Cleveland, corruption and chaotic growth convinced Howe that reform must be initiated by “public-spirited” men who privileged collective well-being, were familiar with “civilized” European cities, and experimented with reform.
    [Show full text]
  • The Progressive Era
    The Progressive Era 1900 – 1916 S C M T M L u P G i u e i a f o o v c m d b f p o i k p c o r u l r l e G l r a a r i o a R c g a U s o s i k e n n t s s g e t c i t s h r e W o e t s o n s s m s e n Aims of Progressivism • To abolish corruption and unfair practices in government, industry, labor, and society • To give people more say in governing • To improve quality of life by the government Rosa Schneiderman, Garment Worker Child Labor Average Shirtwaist Worker’s Week 51 hours or less 4,554 5% 52-57 hours 65,033 79% 58-63 hours 12,211 15% Over 63 hours 562 1% Total employees, men and women 82,360 Womens’ Trade Union League Women Voting for a Strike! The Uprising of the Twenty Thousands (Dedicated to the Waistmakers of 1909) In the black of the winter of nineteen nine, When we froze and bled on the picket line, We showed the world that women could fight And we rose and won with women's might. Chorus: Hail the waistmakers of nineteen nine, Making their stand on the picket line, Breaking the power of those who reign, Pointing the way, smashing the chain. And we gave new courage to the men Who carried on in nineteen ten And shoulder to shoulder we'll win through, Led by the I.L.G.W.U.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 No Single Effort by the Social Work Profession in the General Domain Of
    No single effort by the social work profession in the general domain of prevention has paralleled, in scope or popular support, the campaign to reduce infant mortality undertaken by the United States Children’s Bureau between 1912 and 1930. This small federal agency, staffed and lead primarily by women, was in the vanguard of Progressive Era efforts to safeguard the welfare of women and children. Its visionary program of empirical field research, multi-level preventive intervention, and legislative change provides an integrative model for social work practice that has rarely been surpassed.1 Among its many exemplary activities, the bureau’s pioneering work in the area of infant mortality is particularly salient, not least because of its relevance to contemporary struggles to design, implement, and evaluate effective social work prevention models in maternal and child health and welfare. During the years in which the Children’s Bureau focused on infant mortality, the national infant mortality rate was cut in half. A substantial yearly decline prevailed for decades thereafter. Empirical assessment of the actual contributions of the Children’s Bureau to this remarkable reduction in infant mortality has, however, been elusive. Many developments during this period indisputably influenced the nation’s health, and arguably may have played a larger role in reducing infant mortality than the efforts of the Children’s Bureau. In the early decades of this century, improvements in national transportation and agricultural technology fostered better
    [Show full text]
  • Another Mothers' Movement, 1890 to 1920
    The Mothers Movement Online www.mothersmovement.org • page 1 Another Mothers’ Movement, 1890 to 1920 The role of women’s voluntary organizations in Progressive Era social reform On July 19th, 1848, Elizabeth Cady Stanton presented her Declaration of Sentiments at the first women’s rights convention in Seneca Falls, New York. Stanton and other supporters of the early women’s rights movement set in motion a wave of progress that moves us to this day. Yet the long struggle to win the vote for women is only one example of the extraordinary fortitude of 19th century woman activists. Sympathy for Stanton’s demand for enfranchisement was not universal—at a time when the ideology of domesticity was in full flower, the suggestion that women had inalienable rights and civic responsibili- ties was treated with derision by most men and many women. However, even women who openly rejected the appeal for women’s suffrage were poised to expand their social influence beyond the boundaries of the domestic sphere. During the Victorian and Progressive eras (1830 to 1920) millions of middle-class wives and mothers took part in grassroots political action through affiliation in women’s voluntary organizations. Rather than challenging the status quo of male dominance, reform-minded clubwomen exploited the cultural ideology of their day–an idealization of womanhood that granted women moral pre-eminence and absolute authority in all matters related to the health and welfare of the family—to achieve their political goals. From pure food and milk to better wages for women workers, reforms championed by women’s groups during this period were aimed at protecting the well-being of mothers and children and pre- serving the maternal-child bond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woman's Committee of The
    “THERE SHALL BE NO WOMAN SLACKERS”: THE WOMAN’S COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AND SOCIAL WELFARE ACTIVISM AS HOME DEFENSE, 1917-1919 By Anita Anthony VanOrsdal A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of History – Doctor of Philosophy 2016 ABSTRACT “THERE SHALL BE NO WOMAN SLACKERS”: THE WOMAN’S COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AND SOCIAL WELFARE ACTIVISM AS HOME DEFENSE, 1917-1919 By Anita Anthony VanOrsdal When the United States entered the Great War in 1917, President Woodrow Wilson and Secretary of War Newton Baker organized the Council of National Defense, a group of civilian businessmen in essential industries, labor leaders, and transportation experts, to coordinate for wartime needs. President Wilson and Secretary Baker also created the Woman’s Committee as a semiautonomous branch of the Council of National Defense to represent and coordinate the nation’s women to organize and maintain the home-front for the duration of the war. Under federal mandate, the Woman’s Committee defined “home-front defense” as the protection of the American family, most notably the nation’s women and children, from the social disruptions of World War I. The Woman’s Committee established coalitions with Progressive Era women’s clubs to assist the U.S. Food Administration with wartime food and nutritional needs, coordinated a massive child-savings campaign with the federal Children’s Bureau, and conducted sociological research to support demands from working-class women. The Woman’s Committee’s goals supported the war effort and expanded women’s domestic political power through social welfare activism.
    [Show full text]