DOCSLIB.ORG

Harney Basin Groundwater Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harney Basin Groundwater Study 3210 N Canyon Road Suite 300 Provo, UT 84604 Harney Basin Groundwater Study Submitted to: Harney County Watershed Council 450 N Buena Vista Avenue #4 Burns, Oregon 97720 Submitted by: Aquaveo, LLC 3210 N Canyon Road Suite 300 Provo, UT 84604 Mark Yinger Associates 69860 Camp Polk Road Sisters, OR 97759 WPN P.O. Box 8 Mount Hood, OR 97041 Harney County Final Report, December 27, 2012 Harney County Final Report, December 27, 2012 Mark Yinger, an Oregon Registered Geologist, is responsible for the geologic and hydrogeologic content of this report titled “Harney Basin Groundwater Study”. Mark Yinger Associates, Sisters, Oregon. Expires: May 31st, 2013 Harney County Final Report, December 27, 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents ________________________________________________________ i List of Figures __________________________________________________________ iii List of Tables ___________________________________________________________ iv 1. Project Overview __________________________________________________ 1 2. Literature and Data Review __________________________________________ 1 2.1. Existing Data __________________________________________________________ 2 2.2. Hydrology Literature and Resources _______________________________________ 4 2.3. Literature Folder - Geologic, Hydrogeologic, and Water Resource Literature _______ 7 3. Database Development and Data Analysis ______________________________ 7 3.1. Stratigraphy Definition and Methodology ___________________________________ 7 3.2. Data Processing _______________________________________________________ 10 3.3. Design and Create Geodatabase __________________________________________ 11 3.4. Import Data __________________________________________________________ 11 3.5. Create GIS Products ____________________________________________________ 14 3.6. Document Geodatabase ________________________________________________ 20 4. Geologic Framework and Aquifer Definition ___________________________ 21 4.1. Regional Geologic Setting _______________________________________________ 21 4.2. Geodatabase Unit Descriptions __________________________________________ 25 4.3. Hydrogeologic Units ___________________________________________________ 28 5. Groundwater Basin Description ______________________________________ 33 5.1. Hydrology and Water Budget ____________________________________________ 33 5.2. Geology _____________________________________________________________ 46 5.3. Hydrogeology ________________________________________________________ 47 5.4. Groundwater Levels ___________________________________________________ 49 5.5. Groundwater Use _____________________________________________________ 66 6. Identifying Data Gaps and Proposed Monitoring ________________________ 67 i Harney County Final Report, December 27, 2012 6.1. Borehole Data ________________________________________________________ 67 6.2. Groundwater Monitoring _______________________________________________ 68 6.3. Surface Water Hydrology _______________________________________________ 69 6.4. Pump Test ___________________________________________________________ 70 6.5. Groundwater Use _____________________________________________________ 70 6.6. Groundwater Model ___________________________________________________ 70 References Cited _______________________________________________________ 71 Appendix A. Explanation of Database Fields ______________________________ 73 Appendix B. Weed & Poteet #1 Oil Exploration Well Log ____________________ 77 Appendix C. Data for Selected Wells Used in Fence Diagram ________________ 82 Appendix D. State Observation Hydrographs _____________________________ 96 ii Harney County Final Report, December 27, 2012 List of Figures Figure 2-1. Harney Basin stream gage map .................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3-1. Cenozoic stratigraphy of the Harney Basin area from Walker, 1979 .......................................... 8 Figure 3-2. Format of the BoreholeLog table. ...............................................................................................10 Figure 3-3. Hydrogeologic Table ..................................................................................................................12 Figure 3-4. Well Feature Example with Pump Test Data ..............................................................................13 Figure 3-5. BoreholeLog Table .....................................................................................................................14 Figure 3-6. Feature Datasets inside the geodatabase .....................................................................................14 Figure 3-7. Borelines in ArcScene ................................................................................................................16 Figure 3-8. Interpreted Borelines in ArcScene .............................................................................................17 Figure 3-9. Subsurface Cross Sections ..........................................................................................................18 Figure 3-10. Subsurface Cross Sections with Surface Imagery .....................................................................19 Figure 3-11. Cross Sections in ArcMap ........................................................................................................20 Figure 4-1. Geology Map with Harney Structural Basin ...............................................................................23 Figure 4-2. Geology Map Legend .................................................................................................................24 Figure 5-1. Mean daily discharge for three long-term stream gages within the Harney Basin ......................34 Figure 5-2. Mean daily discharge/square mile for three long-term stream gages within the Harney Basin ..34 Figure 5-3. Estimated recurrence intervals for annual peak flowsfor three long-term stream gages within the Harney Basin .................................................................................................................................................35 Figure 5-4. Primary Inputs, outputs, and processes in the Deep Percolation Model (from Bauer and Vaccaro, 1987) ..............................................................................................................................................37 Figure 5-5. Meteorology stations in and adjacent to the Harney Basin .........................................................40 Figure 5-6. Annual precipitation and recharge by water year for the Harney Basin .....................................44 Figure 5-7. Annual recharge as a function of annual precipitation ................................................................44 Figure 5-8. Mean monthly precipitation and recharge for the Harney Basin ................................................45 Figure 5-9. Monthly recharge as a function of monthly precipitation ...........................................................45 Figure 5-10. Locations of State Observation Wells .......................................................................................49 Figure 5-11. 1936-1969 Mean Groundwater Level Contour and Flow Direction Map .................................52 Figure 5-12. 1970s Mean Groundwater Level Contour and Flow Direction Map .........................................53 Figure 5-13. 1980s Mean Groundwater Level Contour and Flow Direction Map .........................................54 Figure 5-14. 1990s Mean Groundwater Level Contour and Flow Direction Map .........................................55 Figure 5-15. 2000s Mean Groundwater Level Contour and Flow Direction Map .........................................56 Figure 5-16. 2010-2013 Mean Groundwater Level Contour and Flow Direction Map .................................57 Figure 5-17. Standard Deviation for Water Level Data for All Observation Wells Having a Record of at Least Five Water Level Measurements .........................................................................................................59 Figure 5-18. 1936-1969 Mean Groundwater Level Subtracted from the Mean for 2010-2012 .....................61 Figure 5-19. 1970s Mean Groundwater Level Subtracted from the Mean for 2010-2012 ............................62 Figure 5-20. 1980s Mean Groundwater Level Subtracted from the Mean for 2010-2012 ............................63 Figure 5-21. 1990s Mean Groundwater Level Subtracted from the Mean for 2010-2012 ............................64 Figure 5-22. 2000s Mean Groundwater Level Subtracted from the Mean for 2010-2012 ............................65 Figure D-1. Well HARN000323 Hydrograph ...............................................................................................97 Figure D-2. Well HARN000440 Hydrograph ...............................................................................................97 Figure D-3. Well HARN000463 Hydrograph ...............................................................................................98 Figure D-4. Well HARN000547 Hydrograph ...............................................................................................98 Figure D-5. Well HARN000607 Hydrograph ...............................................................................................99 iii Harney County Final Report, December 27, 2012 Figure D-6. Well HARN000741 Hydrograph ...............................................................................................99
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann
    Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann United States Forest Pacific Northwest General Tecnical Report Department of Service Research Station PNW-GTR-578 Agriculture April 2003 Revised 2004 Joseph area, eastern Oregon. Photo by Tom Iraci Authors Sally Campbell is a biological scientist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 SW Main, Portland, OR 97205. Cover: Aspen, Umatilla National Forest. Photo by Tom Iraci Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2003 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of eastern Oregon forests, which provides highlights from recent forest inventories.This publication has been made possible by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. This report was developed from data gathered by the FIA in eastern Oregon’s forests in 1998 and 1999, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests between 1993 and 1996.This report and other analyses of FIA inventory data will be extremely useful as we evaluate fire management strategies, opportunities for improving rural economies, and other elements of forest management in eastern Oregon.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to work with the researchers, analysts, policymakers, and the general public to collect, analyze, and distrib- ute information about Oregon’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Harney Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Greater Harney Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan January 2020 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Greater Harney Basin Local Advisory Committee with support from the Harney Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Harney SWCD Water Quality Program 530 Highway 20 South 635 Capitol St. NE Hines, OR 97738 Salem, OR 97301 Phone: (541) 573-5010 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms .................................................................................................................................... i Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Required Elements of Area Plans ......................................................................................................... iii Plan Content.................................................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans...... 1 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program .............................................................................. 1 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR
    The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit 2018 Linking Collaboration Efforts to Build a Best Harney County High Desert Partnership’s Mission Summit Vision The High Desert Partnership exists to cultivate collaboration and We believe this summit will provide a productive time for those support and strengthen diverse partners engaged in solving participating in collaborative work in Harney County to network, complex issues to advance healthy ecosystems, economic well- learn and look for opportunities to work together. Bringing together being and social vitality to ensure a thriving and resilient the collaborative initiatives will create synergy and the story of community. collaboration will reverberate in our community. The outcomes from this summit will lead to more resilient communities. Our Core Values o We believe in our collaborative process to address societal Goals of the Summit issues. o Increase the understanding of collaborative efforts in Harney o We believe in doing things right rather than right now. County. o We believe in recognizing the values of others. o Understand the links where initiatives can work together on o We believe in advocating for the process, not for outcomes. projects or programs. o We believe in taking a holistic approach: social, ecological and o Find the places for sharing resources. economic. o Grow the community's collaborative participation. o We believe that optimism is necessary to successfully address o Provide a venue for those in attendance to gain a better the challenges we face. understanding of the work of High Desert Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Current Forest and Range Landscapes in the Interior
    United States Department of Historical and Current Forest Agriculture Forest Service and Range Landscapes in the Pacific Northwest Research Station United States Interior Columbia River Basin Department of the Interior and Portions of the Klamath Bureau of Land Management General Technical and Great Basins Report PNW-GTR-458 September 1999 Part 1: Linking Vegetation Patterns and Landscape Vulnerability to Potential Insect and Pathogen Disturbances Authors PAUL F. HESSBURG is a research plant pathologist and R. BRION SALTER is a GIS analyst, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 1133 N. Western Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801; BRADLEY G. SMITH is a quantitative ecologist, Pacific Northwest Region, Deschutes National Forest, 1645 Highway 20 E., Bend, OR 97701; SCOTT D. KREITER is a GIS analyst, Wenatchee, WA; CRAIG A. MILLER is a geographer, Wenatchee, WA; CECILIA H. McNICOLL was a plant ecol- ogist, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, and is currently at Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Leadville Ranger District, Leadville, CO 80461; and WENDEL J. HANN was the regional ecologist, Northern Region, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, and is currently the National Landscape Ecologist stationed at White River National Forest, Dillon Ranger District, Silverthorne, CO 80498. Historical and Current Forest and Range Landscapes in the Interior Columbia River Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins Part 1: Linking Vegetation Patterns and Landscape Vulnerability to Potential Insect and Pathogen Disturbances Paul F. Hessburg, Bradley G. Smith, Scott D. Kreiter, Craig A. Miller, R. Brion Salter, Cecilia H. McNicoll, and Wendel J. Hann Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project: Scientific Assessment Thomas M.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Conservation Partnership Program Investing in Idaho
    Regional Conservation Partnership Program Investing in Idaho Regional Conservation Partnership Program Created by the 2014 Farm Bill, the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) is a partner- Idaho Projects to driven, locally-led approach to conservation. It offers new opportunities for USDA’s Natural Resources Date Conservation Service (NRCS) to harness innovation, welcome new partners to the conservation mission, and demonstrates the value and efficacy of voluntary, private lands conservation. Projects by Resource Concern In 2017, NRCS is investing up to $225 million in 88 projects that impact nearly every state in the nation, including three in Idaho. Since 2014, NRCS has invested more than $825 million in 286 high- 3 3 impact projects, bringing together more than 2,000 conservation partners who have invested an additional $1.4 billion. By 2018, NRCS and partners will have invested at least $2.4 billion. These projects are leading to cleaner and more abundant water, better soil and air quality, enhance wildlife habitat, more resilient and productive agricultural lands and stronger rural economies. 4 Water Quantity/Drought Water Quality Wildlife Habitat 10 Projects $26.3 million NRCS Investment 93 Partners Idaho RCPP Projects Existing RCPP Projects Year Title Funding Lead Partner Number of NRCS Pool Partners Investment 2016 Farmer's Cooperative Ditch Company Project State Farmer’s Cooperative Ditch 7 $500,000 Company 2016 Greater Spokane River Watershed National Spokane Conservation 21 $7.7 million Implementation District 2016
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Craters Oregon's Geologic
    Text by Ellen M. Benedict, 1985 Features at stops correspond to points on a clock ago, a huge mass of hot gases, volcanic ashes, bits face. Imagine that you are standing in the middle of a of pumice and other pyroclastics (fire-broken rock) Travel And Hiking Hints clock face. Twelve o’clock is the road in front of you violently erupted. The blast – greater than the May and 6 o’clock the road behind. If you always align the 18, 1980, eruption of Mt. St. Helens – deposited a Diamond Craters is located in the high desert country clock face with the road, you should be able to locate layer of pyroclastics 30 to 130 feet thick over an area about 55 miles southeast of Burns, Oregon. It’s an the features. almost 7,000 square miles! isolated place and some precautions should be taken . when traveling in the area. Start Tour. Mileage begins halfway Pyroclastics are between milepost 40 and 41 on State normal behavior Diamond Craters has no tourist facilities. The nearest Highway 205 at the junction to Diamond. for magmas place where gasoline is sold is at Frenchglen. Turn left. (subsurface That’s the opinion held by scores of molten rocks) Keep your scientists and educators who have visited Diamond, Oregon, a small ranching community, was of rhyolitic (a vehicle on named in 1874 for Mace McCoy’s Diamond brand. volcanic material and studied the area. It has the “best and hard-packed The nearby craters soon became known as Diamond related to granite) most diverse basaltic volcanic features in the road surfaces Craters.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Quail Translocations in Eastern Oregon
    MOUNTAIN QUAIL TRANSLOCATIONS IN EASTERN OREGON Project Report: 2010 Trout Creek Mountains Kevyn Groot, Mountain Quail Technician Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Hines District Office 237 Highway 20 South, P.O. Box 8 Hines, OR 97738 (541) 573-6582 1 Table of Contents Page Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………...2 Methods………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………….......12 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………..….17 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………....…18 References…………………………………………………………………………………..…19 Appendix I: Mountain Quail Movements from Release Site to Breeding Range by Project Year…………………………………………………………………….….21 Appendix II: List of Tables and Maps………………………………………………….…....22 Maps……………………………………………………………………………………………23 2 Introduction The primary distribution of the mountain quail (Oreortyx pictus) includes the Sierra Nevada, the Cascades, and the Coast Range of the western United States (Gutiérrez and Delehanty 1999). Populations in the western Great Basin are currently the focus of conservation efforts due to a steady decline that began in the 20th century (Crawford 2000). In particular, eastern Oregon, western Nevada, and western Idaho have shown evidence of diminished populations that warrant significant concern. Fire suppression, water development, and overgrazing by livestock in brush and riparian zones have contributed to the degradation of mountain quail habitat in these regions and are cited as the main causes of population declines (Brennan 1994 in Gutiérrez and Delehanty 1999, Pope and Crawford 2000). The Mountain Quail Translocation Program for Eastern Oregon began in 2001 as a cooperative effort between the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), the U.S. Forest Service, and the Game Bird Research Program at Oregon State University. The goal of this initiative is to actively restore viable, self-sustaining mountain quail populations to affected native ranges in eastern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • High Desert Region Around Bend, Oregon by Lee Foster
    High Desert Region Around Bend, Oregon by Lee Foster Beauty of nature in an alpine setting and diverse outdoor sports attract visitors to the Bend region of Central Oregon. Perusing natural beauty is the most universal pleasure here. Snow-capped mountains, pristine lakes, white-water rivers, and pine forests abound. At any time, the wilderness scenery is striking, with one of the dominant peaks, Mt. Bachelor, Broken Top, and the Sisters, usually present on your horizon. The main natural imprint on the land is a black volcanic presence. For the geology enthusiast, the Lava Lands Visitor Center explains the historic volcanic flows that form a stark legacy. Lava Butte is a 500-foot-high cinder cone, a silent reminder of past volcanic upheavals. A Rockhound Pow-Wow gathers amateur geologists here each July. Since opening in 1982, the High Desert Museum, south of Bend, has emerged as the most important nature interpretive effort in the state. (The High Desert Museum at Bend parallels Tucson’s Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum.) The raptor exhibit alone is worth the visit, putting you as close as you may ever get to a great horned owl, a red-tailed hawk, and an American kestrel. Foremost among the outdoor sports here is skiing at Mt. Bachelor. An extremely long ski season, both for alpine and nordic skiing, lasts into summer. The high- elevation chair lift to the top of Bachelor is popular also with non-skiers who seek an inspiring view of the region. In summer, hikers and campers depart from Bend for the nearby wilderness areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High-Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Andrew G. Talabere for the degree of Master of Science in Fisheries Science presented on November 21. 2002. Title: Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High-Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy Redacted for Privacy The distribution of Lahontan cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi was assessed in a high-desert stream in southeastern Oregon where beaver Castor canadensis are abundant. Longitudinal patterns of beaver ponds, habitat, temperature, and Lahontan cutthroat trout age group distribution were identified throughout Willow Creek. Three distinct stream segments were classified based on geomorphological characteristics. Four beaver-pond and four free-flowing sample sections were randomly located in each of the three stream segments. Beavers substantially altered the physical habitat of Willow Creek increasing the depth and width of available habitat. In contrast, there was no measurable effect on water temperature. The total number of Lahontan cutthroat trout per meter was significantly higher in beaver ponds than free-flowing sections. Although density (fish! m2) showed no statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase, values in beaver pondswere two-fold those of free-flowing sections. Age- 1 and young-of-the-year trout were absent or in very low numbers in lower Willow Creek because of elevated temperatures, but high numbers of age-2 and 3 (adults) Lahontan cutthroat trout were found in beaver ponds where water temperatures reached lethal levels (>24°C). Apparently survival is greater in beaver ponds than free-flowing sections as temperatures approach lethal limits. Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High- Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon by Andrew G.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Oregon High Desert Tour 2019 Final 2
    HeartCycle Bicycle Touring Club Central Oregon High Desert Tour Dates: Assemble in Sisters on June 10; Riding days June 11-16; depart June 17 Leaders: Ann Werner & Bill Buckley SAGs: Gail Buckley & Polly Page Miles: 288 miles, 13,670 ft climbing (can increase climbing) Rating: Int/Adv Riders: 28 Price: Total $ 1695 (Double occupancy), $400 at Registration, balance due by March 1, 2019. Single supplement fee $850. Overview Central Oregon, on the east side of the Cascade Mountains, is famed for its sunny, dry weather. It is big blue-sky country featuring snowcapped volcanoes, red barked ponderosa pine forests, high desert sage steppe, expansive lava fields and crystal clear mountain lakes. For those who live by mountain ranges, the solitary peaks of the volcanos are remarkable. The tour has two bases: Sunriver Resort and Sisters. Sunriver is a 4 Diamond Resort ten miles south of Bend where we will have a free day. The rooms are close to the Lodge and Village, which makes it easy for dining, canoeing, rafting, golf and enjoying the pool. Sunriver Golf Course Sisters is named after the Three Sisters mountains near it. The town is a charming western themed town of 2,000 with a pleasant ambience for hanging out after a ride – dining, brew, coffee & shopping. The Ponderosa Best Western has oversized rooms and is ideally located for riding and enjoying the town. The rides average 60 miles with most rides out and back. The rides are on Oregon Scenic Byways or Bikeways. Some have extended climbs of 2,500 but at a reasonable grade.
    [Show full text]
  • Alvord Lake Toerswnq Ihitk-Ul,.N Itj:Lnir
    RtflOP' nt T37S Rt3F T37SR36E T37S R3275E 137S R34E TITStSE BloW Pour Willow Creek Babes Canyor Relds BIM Adrnirtistrative SiteFjel NeSs Airstrip / 41 171 2000906 Alvord Lake tOerswnq ihiTk-ul,.n itj:Lnir. Inokoul hluutte\ McDade Ranch 1712000902 I cvwr Twin Hot Spn Os Wilhlants Canyon , ,AEyy.4N seiralNo WARM APRI '738SR37E rIBS R3BE R38E Lower Roux Place err hlomo * / Oaterkirk Rartch - S., Rabbit HOe Mine 7,g.hit 0 Ptace '0 Arstnp 0 0 Ainord Vafley Lavy1ronrb P -o Rriaia .....c I herbbrrr RarrCh C _: 9S R34E Trout Creek CAhn '5- T39S R36E N Oleacireen Place T395 R37F Cruallu Canyon -1 Oleachea Pass T39S R38E \ Stergett Cabot Trout Creek Ranch ty Silvey Adrian Place' Wee Pole Canyon C SPRiNG, WHITEHORSE RANCH LN Pueblo Valley 4040 S Center Ridg Will, reek Pt cLean Cabin orgejadowo Gob 0810 WEIi Reynolds Ranch Owens Randr / I p labor Mocntai /1 °ueblo Mountain A'ir.STWLL Neil Pei S 'i-nWt Mahogany Ri.ge ,haaesot, uSGi, Pee: enn;s *i;i train ' 6868 4 n*a.asay Holloway T4OS R34E T4OS R35E I 1405 6E T405 R37E 'I 14'R38E / i.l:irintoi "Van Hone Basin' Colony Ranch 0 U Lithe Windy Pass z SChrERRYSPR1N. 0 I 1* RO4 - - 'r Denio Basin A' tuitdIhSPIhlNn% ()Conne eme Cottonwood Creek ie;. r' Gller Cabin T4IS R37E L,aticw P ',ik 1712000901 Grassy Basin BLAiRO tih'dlM P4 IS R34E Ago 141S R36E Lung Canyon Ii Middle Canyon Oecio Cemetery East B. ring Corral Canyon ento Nevada portion of this HUC was not assessed for this project MAP # 9 - Alvord Lake Sub-basin - 5th Field HUC 1712000901 Cottonwood Creek 1 inch equals 2.25 miles High and Low Elevations BLM Land Perennial Lake Paved Roads 5th Field Watersheds BLM Wilderness - Intermittent Lake County Roads S Alvord Lake Sub-Basin BLM Wilderness Study Area Dry Lake Arterial Roads HARNEY COUNTY GIS Prnpaeod by: Bryca Mcrnz Dare: Momlu 2006 State Land Marsh "_.
    [Show full text]