Law Program 4-11
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Office of the Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU 530 SOUTH KING STREET, ROOM 300 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 PHONE: (808) 768-4141 • FAX: (808) 768-4242 • INTERNET: www.honolulu.gov KIRK CALDWELL ROY K. AMEMIYA, JR. MAYOR MANAGING DIRECTOR GEORGETTE T. DEEMER DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR June 2, 2020 The Honorable Ikaika Anderson Chair and Presiding Officer and Members Honolulu City Council 530 South King Street, Room 202 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Dear Chair Anderson and Councilmembers: SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2021 (FY21) Executive Operating Budget Bill 20, CDI The Office of Economic Development (OED) respectfully requests removal of the proviso in Bill 20, CDI restricting funding in the Office of the Managing Director — City Management from appropriation for the Sister Cities Programs. The proviso states “No funds shall be appropriated for the Sister Cities Program.” This proviso would prevent OED from fully realizing its mission in FY21 to promote economic growth and enhance the quality of life for the residents of the City and County of Honolulu by cultivating tourism and hospitality, advancing business, assisting agricultural development, and promoting the screen industries. The City and County of Honolulu enjoys a long and vibrant Sister City Program that not only has enriched cultural exchanges but brings direct economic benefit to Honolulu through donations, investments and business opportunities. Sister City guidelines were established by Resolution 91-240 which requires City funds be “appropriated within two years of the signing of the document establishing the Sister City relationship and every five years thereafter to provide for the exchange of gifts or good will missions to promote the newly established sisterhood and the concept of mutual understanding.” OED shared with the council reports on the Status of Sister Cities of the City and County of Honolulu that detailed recent activities between our city and each Sister City (attached). -
Court Case Management Information Systems Manual
National Center for State Courts COURT CASE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANUAL: with Model Data Elements, Reporting Forms, and Management Reports, by Mary Louise -Clifford and Lynn A. Jensen prepared by the State Judicial Information Systems Project and the National Court Statistics Project in cooperation with the Conference of State Court Administrators The material contained in this report was prepared by the National Center for State Courts' State Judicial Information Systems Project staff, with support from the staff of the National Court Statistics Project. These two projects were supported by Federal Grant No. 82-CJ-CX-KOOl, awarded to the National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg, Virginia, by the Systems Development Division, and Federal Grant No. 82-BJ-CX-K014, awarded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, part of the U.S. Department of Justice, under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended. The State Judicial Information Systems Project has been directed by Lynn A. Jensen for the National Center for State Courts and monitored by Donald A. Manson for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The National Court Statistics Project has been directed by Victor E. Flango for the National Center and monitored by Carla Gaskins for the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Clifford, Mary Louise. Court case management information systems manual. Bibliography: p. 1. Court adrninistration--United States. -
May 11Th Letters DREAMHOUSE EWA BEACH Congresswoman
May 11th Letters DREAMHOUSE EWA BEACH Congresswoman Colleen Hanabusa, US House of Representatives Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, US House of Representatives Councilmember Ron Menor, Chair, Honolulu City Council Councilmember Kymberly Pine, Honolulu City Council Senator Will Espero, Hawai‘i State Senate Representative Matthew LoPresti, Hawai‘i House of Representatives Representative Takashi Ohno, Hawai‘i House of Representatives Representative Jarrett Keohokalole, Hawai‘i House of Representatives Dr. Michael Chun, Former Headmaster, Kamehameha Schools Jeannine Souki, Executive Director, Hawai‘i Public Charter School Network Momi Akana, Executive Director, Keiki O Ka Aina Keiki Mora, Board Chair, Keiki O Ka Aina Keiki Kawai‘ae‘a, Board Co-Chair, WINHEC (World Indigenous Nations Higher Education Consortium) Trever Asam, Partner, Cade Schutte Will Austin, Chief Executive Officer, Boston Schools Fund Cathy Stathakos, Owner, The Daily Lunchbox Michael Rabang, Owner, Hawai‘i Modular Space Robert Kayser, Vice President, The Gentry Companies Bari Cooper Sherman, Co-Founder & Principal, Turner Impact Capital Peter Anderson, Principal, Anderson Anderson Architecture Dr. Mary Grassa O’Neill, Director, Harvard Graduate School of Education School Leadership Program Melissa Corto, Founder, Education Modified Dr. Roger Kiyomura, Professor, Hawai‘i Pacific University Donald Khun, Parent, Ewa Beach Regan Balmoja, former teacher, Campbell High School Stephanie Dalton, former teacher, Kamehameha Schools Katie Martin, former teacher, Ilima Intermediate Natalie Moreland, law student, William S. Richardson School of Law The Senate STATE CAPITOL HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 December 14, 2016 Dear Chairperson Payne and members of the Commission, I write to you today in support of the DreamHouse Ewa Beach Public Charter School proposal that is being presented before you. -
EI Du Pont De Nemours and Company
February 4, 2016 Deborah L. Daisley E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company [email protected] Re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Dear Ms. Daisley: This is in regard to your letter dated February 3, 2016 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted by As You Sow on behalf of Andrew Behar for inclusion in DuPont’s proxy materials for its upcoming annual meeting of security holders. Your letter indicates that the proponent has withdrawn the proposal and that DuPont therefore withdraws its December 28, 2015 request for a no-action letter from the Division. Because the matter is now moot, we will have no further comment. Copies of all of the correspondence related to this matter will be made available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8.shtml. For your reference, a brief discussion of the Division’s informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals is also available at the same website address. Sincerely, Evan S. Jacobson Special Counsel cc: Danielle R. Fugere As You Sow [email protected] February 3, 2016 Deborah L. Daisley Corporate Governance Associate & Assistant Secretary DuPont, CRP 730/52 16 Tel: 302-999-5411 E-mail: [email protected] VIA E-MAIL ([email protected]) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Office of Chief Counsel JOO F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY PROXY STATEMENT -2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL BY AS YOU SOW Ladies and Gentlemen: By letter dated December 28, 2015, DuPont requested that the above-mentioned shareholder proposal properly be omitted from DuPont's proxy materials to be distributed by DuPont in connection with its 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. -
Annual Report FY20
DEPARTMENT AND AGENCY REPORTS for Fiscal Year July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS City & County Organizational Chart .................. 2 Emergency Services (HESD) .........................47 Boards & Commissions Organizational Chart ...... 3 Enterprise Services (DES) ..............................49 Mayor’s Message ............................................... 5 Environmental Services (ENV) .......................51 Facility Maintenance (DFM) ............................53 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Fire (HFD) .......................................................57 Office of the Mayor (MAY) ................................9 Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) ...........................................................59 OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICES Human Resources (DHR) ...............................61 Boards, Commissions & Committees (BCC) ....15 Information Technology (DIT) .........................63 Neighborhood Commission (NCO) ...................19 Land Management (DLM) ...............................65 Office of Climate Change, Sustainability and Resiliency (CCSR) ......................................21 Medical Examiner (MED) ................................67 Office of Culture and the Arts (MOCA) .............23 Parks and Recreation (DPR) ..........................69 Office of Economic Development (OED) ........25 Planning and Permitting (DPP) .......................73 Office of Housing (HOU) .................................27 Police (HPD) ...................................................77 Royal Hawaiian Band -
¢¡¤£¦¥¨§ © § ¡ ¥ "!# %$ §' &¢(0)1 2§ 3 4 65" 2§¨7
No. 02-241 In the ¢¡¤£¦¥¨§ © § ¡¥§¢ § ! "$# §¨% ______ BARBARA GRUTTER, PETITIONER, v. LEE BOLLINGER, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. ______ ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF 13,922 CURRENT LAW STUDENTS AT ACCREDITED AMERICAN LAW SCHOOLS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS JULIE R. O’SULLIVAN Counsel of Record PETER J. RUBIN Georgetown Univ. Law Center 600 New Jersey Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 662-9394 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE................................. 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT.................................... 1 ARGUMENT................................................................ 2 PROMOTING DIVERSITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION IS A COMPELLING GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST............................ 2 I. Justice Powell’s Opinion in Bakke, Holding that Diversity is a Compelling Governmental Interest, is Controlling and Should be Followed .... 2 II. A Diverse Student Body Imparts Invaluable Educational and Social Benefits To Law Students ................................................................... 3 A. Diversity Contributes to a Wide, Robust Exchange of Ideas, Essential to the Discovery of Truth and to the Critical Debate Necessary to Legal Education.............. 3 B. Diversity is Essential to Fostering Speculation, Experimentation and Creation in Law School .................................... 5 C. Legal Education is Severely Diminished in Isolation from the Individuals and Institutions -
70% Surveyed Give Mayor the Thumbs up - Hawaii News - Honolulu Star-Advertiser Staradvertiser.Com
http://www.staradvertiser.com/newspremium/20150203__70_surveyed_give_mayor_the_thumbs_up.html?id=290624621 Honolulu Star-Advertiser, Hawaii's news leader. - 70% surveyed give mayor the thumbs up - Hawaii News - Honolulu Star-Advertiser StarAdvertiser.com 70% surveyed give mayor the thumbs up Caldwell gets roughly the same rating he did in 2014, despite his homeless policies By Gordon Y.K. Pang POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Feb 03, 2015 LAST UPDATED: 09:37 a.m. HST, Feb 03, 2015 Halfway into his first term, Honolulu Mayor Kirk Caldwell retains job performance approval from more than 2 out of 3 registered voters. The 70 percent approval rating from 322 registered voters, as reported in the latest Hawaii Poll, is statistically unchanged from the 72 percent approval rating that registered voters gave Caldwell on the same question in February 2014. The latest poll was conducted Jan. 13-23 by Ward Research Inc. for the Honolulu Star-Advertiser and Hawaii News Now. This portion of the poll has a margin of error of 5.5 percentage points. The strong approval rating comes despite vocal opposition to Caldwell's policies pushing through sit-lie ordinances addressing homelessness and establishing a dedicated bicycle-only lane on King Street. The results also come as Caldwell solidifies his contentious position to support the extension of the 0.5 percent general excise tax surcharge imposed on Oahu consumers beyond 2021 in order to meet a construction budget shortfall and future needs of Honolulu's rail project. Caldwell said the poll results reaffirm the hard work of his administration and the city's civil servants. -
COVID-19 Update Log, October 21, 2020 Hawaii Public Policy
COVID-19 Update Log, October 21, 2020 Hawaii Public Policy Advocates/Hawaii Dental Association Date COVID-19 Update Links 10/21/20 Mayor Caldwell has submitted an order to Governor Ige to move Oahu Oahu poised to move to Tier 2 restrictions later this from Tier 1 to Tier 2, which is expected to be approved before the end of week: the week. In Tier 2, restaurants will be allowed to serve people from https://www.staradvertiser.com/2020/10/20/breaking- different households, gyms will reopen with limited capacity, and short- news/honolulu-mayor-kirk-caldwell-sends-order-for- term vacation rentals will be allowed to operate. Social gatherings, second-tier-of-economic-reopening-to-gov-david-ige-for- including those that are outdoors, are still limited to five people. In order to approval/ move to Tier 3, at minimum Oahu must remain in Tier 2 for four weeks and have two consecutive weeks of under 50 daily cases and under 2.5% Oahu voters disapprove of Governor Ige’s COVID-19 positivity test rate. There is also the possibility of moving back to Tier 1 if response: daily case counts exceed 100 for two consecutive weeks. https://www.staradvertiser.com/2020/10/21/hawaii- news/most-oahu-voters-say-the-governor-could-have- In a poll of Oahu voters, 57% disapproved on Governor Ige’s response to handled-covid-better/ COVID-19, with some saying they believe he has not shown leadership and let the mayors make the decisions. On the positive side, 55% agree with the Majority of Oahu voters want at least some amount of in- pretest travel program. -
Vacancies and Special Elections: 108Th Congress
Order Code RS21539 Updated September 1, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Vacancies and Special Elections: 108th Congress Sula P. Richardson Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division Summary There have been six vacancies to date in the 108th Congress, all in the House. One, in the 2nd District of Hawaii, was caused by the death of the incumbent, who had been re-elected posthumously to the 108th Congress. The other five vacancies were caused by the resignation of the incumbent in the 19th District of Texas, the 6th District of Kentucky, the at-large district of South Dakota, the 1st District of North Carolina, and the 1st District of Nebraska. The first vacancy was filled by special election on January 4, 2003, three days before the 108th Congress convened. For further information, see CRS Report RS20814, Vacancies and Special Elections: 107th Congress. The second vacancy was filled by special election on June 3, 2003. The third vacancy was filled by special election on February 17, 2004. The fourth vacancy was filled by special election on June 1, 2004. The fifth vacancy was filled by special election on July 20, 2004. The recent vacancy in the 1st District of Nebraska will continue throughout the remainder of the 108th Congress. This report records vacancies in the offices of U.S. Representative and Senator that occur during the 108th Congress. It provides information on the former incumbents, the process by which these vacancies are filled, and the names of Members who fill the vacant seats. This report will be updated as events warrant. -
Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials
Michigan Law Review Volume 84 Issue 3 1985 Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials Nancy T. Gardner University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Communications Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Nancy T. Gardner, Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials, 84 MICH. L. REV. 475 (1985). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol84/iss3/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials In 1965, only two states permitted photographic and electronic media coverage1 of courtroom proceedings.2 Today, forty-three states permit television coverage of their appellate and/or trial proceedings on an experimental or permanent basis. 3 This development has not come about in a systematic or uniform fashion. Lacking guidance from the federal courts, the states have independently conducted ex periments and adopted their own guidelines in an attempt to accom modate the conflicting constitutional4 and policy interests5 involved. The development of state guidelines6 has stemmed largely from the belief that media self-discipline is insufficient to ensure fair treatment 1. The phrase "photographic and electronic media coverage," referred to herein as "televis ing" or "broadcasting," includes both the acquisition of information (through devices such as still news photography, audio taping, motion picture filming and videotaping), and the public dissemination and broadcast of that information. -
Trial Court Consolidation in Hawaii: the Road Already Taken?
Trial Court Consolidation in Hawaii: The Road Already Taken? Susan Ekimoto Jaworowski Researcher Report No. 4. 1991 Legislative Reference Bureau State Capitol Honoiulu, Hawaii 96813 FOREWORD This study was prepared in response to House Resolution No. 68, adopted during the Regular Session of 1991. The Resolution requested an examination of the feasibility of consolidating Hawaii's two tier trial court system into one tier. The Resolution also requested information concerning the history and rationale behind establishing the two tier system, an evaluation of the currert trial court system and judicial administration, the rationale behind the differing job requirements and qualifications for judges in the two tiers, and the feasibility of establishing the same requirements for all trial level judges. The assistance of Bureau researcher Charlotte Carter-Yamauchi was a significant factor in the timely completion of this study. Ms. Carter-Yamauchi interviewed many of the circuit court judges and provided invaluable input into several areas, including the structure of the district court questionnaire. The Bureau extends its appreciation to ail who cooperated with and participated in this study, particularly Chief Justice Herman Lum; Dr. Irwin Tanaka, Administrative Director of the Courts; and C. Michael Hare, Chairman of the Judicial Selection Commission. It is hoped that the issues raised by the study will assist the Legislature and the Judiciary in making further incruiries and decisions on this matter. Samuel €3. K. Chang Director November 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 1. INTRODUCTION .... ........................................... 1 Nature and Scope of Study ............................................................................. 1 Endnotes ....................................................................................................... 2 2. HISTORY OF THE TRIAL COURT SYSTEM IN HAWAII ........................................... 3 Pre-1840 Judicial System ............... -
Ho'omalimali and the Succession Model of Political Inheritance In
Ho'omalimali and the Succession Model of Political Inheritance in Hawai'i: A Study of the Electoral Dominance of Americans of Japanese Ancestry in State and Congressional Politics Skyler Allyn Korgel ANS 678H Departmental Honors in Asian Studies The University of Texas at Austin May 2018 Dr. Chiu-Mi Lai Department of Asian Studies Thesis Supervisor Dr. Patricia Maclachlan Department of Government Second Reader Abstract “Ho’omalimali” and the Succession Model of Political Inheritance in Hawai'i: A Study of the Electoral Dominance of Americans of Japanese Ancestry in State and Congressional Politics Author: Skyler Korgel Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Chiu-Mi Lai Second Reader: Dr. Patricia Maclachlan This thesis seeks to discover the underlying causes and factors for the unique political situation in Hawai'i where a minority demographic has been historically dominant. In researching historical and political contexts, as well as institutional and electoral factors, analysis of all these findings has shown a constructed “succession model” behind the dominance of Americans of Japanese Ancestry (AJA) through the Democratic Party. The thesis also examines the implications of the disrupted and further divisive political climate of the Hawai'i Democratic Party since the death of universally respected and revered Senator Daniel Inouye (1924-2012). Senator Inouye’s death brought to an end a political career that spanned nearly six decades, and commenced a new era for Hawai'i political leadership. Quite possibly, this new era has also fractured the succession model. In a 75% minority state, throughout the past 65 years, Americans of Japanese ancestry have managed to gain a stranglehold over the Hawai'i Democratic Party, and therefore the Hawai’i state government itself.