DOCSLIB.ORG

Shared Identity As a Cause for Rivalry Between Rebel Groups

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shared Identity As a Cause for Rivalry Between Rebel Groups Shared identity as a cause for rivalry between rebel groups A comparative case study of the conflict between Ahrar Al-Sham and IS in 2014 and the conflict between Ahrar Al-Sham and the Al Nusra Front in 2017 Karl Modig Thesis, 30 ECTS (hp) War Studies Master’s Programme in Politics and War Autumn 2020 Supervisor: Sophia Hatz Word count: 17 815 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to answer the question of why rebel groups engage in conflict with each other despite sharing an identity. Previous research suggests that a shared identity should promote cooperation, but recent conflicts between rebel groups in Syria seem to suggest that shared identity can instead be a cause for rivalry. This thesis investigates this puzzle by using Pischedda’s theory on windows of opportunity and vulnerability and Hafez theory on proxidistant ideologies. The cases of the thesis are the conflicts between Ahrar Al-Sham and IS in 2014 and between Ahrar Al-Sham and the Al Nusra Front in 2017. The results indicate that shared identity does cause rivalry, and both theories receive support for their explanation of inter-rebel conflict. All three rebel groups are labeled as extremists, which supports Hafez theory that extremist groups are more likely to engage in conflict with rivals. The military strength and the possible costs of attack of the rebel groups seem to support Pischedda’s theory that rebel groups use specific windows in time to attack their rivals. There are however some problems that neither theory can explain, such as Ahrar Al-Shams friendly relationship to Al Nusra between 2014 and 2017. This thesis provide insight into the understudied field of inter- rebel conflict of War Studies by highlighting the importance of identity. Keywords: rebel groups, Syria, identity, rivalry, inter-rebel conflict Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background and research problem .............................................................................................. 1 1.2. Aim and research question ........................................................................................................... 2 2. Previous Literature ................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Rebel group alliances, infighting and identity .............................................................................. 3 3. Theory ...................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1. Window of opportunity and vulnerability .................................................................................... 7 3.2. Proxidistant ideologies ................................................................................................................. 8 3.3. Theoretical framework ................................................................................................................. 9 4. Research design ...................................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Comparative case study ............................................................................................................. 11 4.2. Case selection ............................................................................................................................. 12 4.3. Data analysis & operationalizations ........................................................................................... 13 4.4. Reliability and validity ................................................................................................................ 15 4.5. Material ...................................................................................................................................... 16 5. Empirical background ............................................................................................................. 16 5.1. Ahrar Al-Sham and IS .................................................................................................................. 16 5.2. Ahrar Al-Sham and the Al Nusra Front ....................................................................................... 17 6. Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 18 6.1. The proximate identity of Ahrar Al-Sham, IS and the Al Nusra Front ........................................ 18 6.1.1. The three dimensions of ideology ....................................................................................... 18 6.1.2. Summary.............................................................................................................................. 22 6.2. The windows of opportunity and vulnerability .......................................................................... 22 6.3. Ahrar Al-Sham and IS in 2014 ................................................................................................. 23 6.3.3. Summary of the results for Ahrar Al-Sham and IS in 2014 .................................................. 25 6.4. Ahrar Al-Sham & the Al Nusra Front in 2017 ......................................................................... 26 6.4.1. Summary of the results for Ahrar Al-Sham and the Al Nusra Front in 2017 ....................... 29 7. Discussion and conclusion ....................................................................................................... 29 7.1. Proxidistant ideologies ............................................................................................................... 29 7.2. Windows of opportunity and vulnerability. ............................................................................... 31 7.3. General discussion ...................................................................................................................... 33 7.2. Conclusion, limits and future research ....................................................................................... 34 References ........................................................................................................................................ 37 1. Introduction 1.1. Background and research problem Despite having cooperated for five years, the two rebel groups Ahrar Al-Sham and the Al Nusra Front engaged in open combat in 2017. This was despite the two groups sharing both an identity as Salafi Jihadists and having similar goals (Hassan, 2017). The groups, who had been allied in their fight against the Assad regime in Syria, had occasionally had violent confrontations before 2017 but nothing of this scale. Viewing this from Christias influential perspective on rebel alliances, this makes little sense. Christia (2012:32) would argue that rebel organize themselves into coalitions where they seek to win the war with minimum marginals, yet this case seems to illustrate a case where rebels chose to do otherwise. Furthermore, previous literature has indicated that a shared identity can be an indicator of increased cooperation between rebel groups. While studying the alliances of rebel groups active in the Syrian civil war, Gade, Gabbay, Hafez and Kelly findings implicate that groups that are ideologically similar are more likely to cooperate than groups who are ideologically dissimilar (2019:2091). This puzzle, that rebels fight each other despite their similar identity, is what this thesis will study. In civil wars, rebel groups are often in a conflict with the government. The very intent of the creation of the rebel group is often in response to actions conducted by the government. The goals of the rebel groups may vary, they can include territorial sovereignty, overthrowing the current regime or creating a new state (Buhaug, 2006:695). Despite this, rebel groups often engage in warfare with other rebel groups. The obvious, but sometimes simplistic, solution would be for the rebels to band together in an alliance and unite to fight the government. Yet, Ahrar Al-Sham fought its former allies. What can explain this phenomenon? Using theories on identity, ideological extremism and rationalistic power-grabbing, this thesis tries to explore this topic further using a comparative case study on the Ahrar Al-Sham, IS and the Al Nusra Front rebel groups. The motivation for analyzing these three rebel groups is because of their shared identity as jihadist groups and because of the change in their relationship from cooperative to hostile. Ahrar Al-Sham was founded in 2011 by jihadists who were released from a Syrian prison after having served sentences for their involvement in the Iraqi insurgency. These former prisoners banded together and created the first incarnation of Al-Sham (Yasir, 2016). Ahrar Al- Sham cooperated with IS from 2012 to 2014. Initially following the same pattern as the first case, the relationship between Ahrar Al-Sham and IS was cooperative during the first years, 1 exemplified when they cooperated in taking the Latakia region in 2013. The relationship turned hostile in late 2013 when IS killed Abu Rayyan, a leader of Ahrar Al-Sham. In January the following year, the conflict escalated into open conflict when Ahrar Al-Sham, together with other rebel groups, drove IS out of strongholds in northeastern Syria (Steinberg, 2016:3; Nassief, 2013; Lund, 2014c). IS has been known as Al Qaeda in Iraq, ISIS, ISIL and Daesh but for this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Syria: "Torture Was My Punishment": Abductions, Torture and Summary
    ‘TORTURE WAS MY PUNISHMENT’ ABDUCTIONS, TORTURE AND SUMMARY KILLINGS UNDER ARMED GROUP RULE IN ALEPPO AND IDLEB, SYRIA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2016 Cover photo: Armed group fighters prepare to launch a rocket in the Saif al-Dawla district of the Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons northern Syrian city of Aleppo, on 21 April 2013. (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. © Miguel Medina/AFP/Getty Images https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2016 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: MDE 24/4227/2016 July 2016 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 METHODOLOGY 7 1. BACKGROUND 9 1.1 Armed group rule in Aleppo and Idleb 9 1.2 Violations by other actors 13 2. ABDUCTIONS 15 2.1 Journalists and media activists 15 2.2 Lawyers, political activists and others 18 2.3 Children 21 2.4 Minorities 22 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Direction of Which Ariel Sharon's Disengagement Plan Forms a Part Is the Most Significant Development in Israe
    FRAGMENTED SYRIA: THE BALANCE OF FORCES AS OF LATE 2013 By Jonathan Spyer* Syria today is divided de facto into three identifiable entities. These three entities are: first, the Asad regime itself, which has survived all attempts to divide it from within. The second area is the zone controlled by the rebels. In this area there is no central authority. Rather, the territory is divided up into areas controlled by a variety of militias. The third area consists of majority-Kurdish northeast Syria. This area is under the control of the PYD (Democratic Union Party), the Syrian franchise of the PKK. This article will look into how this situation emerged, and examine its implications for the future of Syria. As the Syrian civil war moves toward its The emergence of a de facto divided Syria fourth anniversary, there are no signs of is the result first and foremost of the Asad imminent victory or defeat for either of the regime’s response to its strategic predicament sides. The military situation has reached a in the course of 2012. By the end of 2011, the stalemate. The result is that Syria today is uprising against the regime had transformed divided de facto into three identifiable entities, from a largely civilian movement into an each of which is capable of defending its armed insurgency, largely because of the existence against threats from either of the regime’s very brutal and ruthless response to others. civilian demonstrations against it. This These three entities are: first, the Asad response did not produce the decline of regime itself, which has survived all attempts opposition, but rather the formation of armed to divide it from within.
    [Show full text]
  • The Islamic Front by Aaron Y
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2177 Rebels Consolidating Strength in Syria: The Islamic Front by Aaron Y. Zelin Dec 3, 2013 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Aaron Y. Zelin Aaron Y. Zelin is the Richard Borow Fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy where his research focuses on Sunni Arab jihadi groups in North Africa and Syria as well as the trend of foreign fighting and online jihadism. Brief Analysis The latest umbrella organization for key rebel factions in Syria may not include U.S.-designated terrorist groups, but it does oppose many U.S. objectives. he recent merger of several Syrian rebel groups into the Islamic Front (IF) is one of the war's most important T developments. Although the political and military opposition has long been fragmented, the new umbrella organization brings seven groups and their combined force of 45,000-60,000 fighters under one command. It also links the fight in the north and the south. Most notably, though, it affirms the troubles Washington will have setting policy in Syria going forward. WHO ARE THEY? F ormally announced on November 22, the IF includes groups from three prior umbrella organizations: the Syrian Islamic Front (SIF), the Syrian Islamic Liberation Front (SILF), and the Kurdish Islamic Front (KIF). From the SIF, Harakat Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiyya (HASI), Kataib Ansar al-Sham, and Liwa al-Haqq joined, as did the KIF as a whole and former SILF brigades Suqur al-Sham, Liwa al-Tawhid, and Jaish al-Islam. None of these groups has been designated by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jihadi Threat: ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Beyond
    THE JIHADI THREAT ISIS, AL QAEDA, AND BEYOND The Jihadi Threat ISIS, al- Qaeda, and Beyond Robin Wright William McCants United States Institute of Peace Brookings Institution Woodrow Wilson Center Garrett Nada J. M. Berger United States Institute of Peace International Centre for Counter- Terrorism Jacob Olidort The Hague Washington Institute for Near East Policy William Braniff Alexander Thurston START Consortium, University of Mary land Georgetown University Cole Bunzel Clinton Watts Prince ton University Foreign Policy Research Institute Daniel Byman Frederic Wehrey Brookings Institution and Georgetown University Car ne gie Endowment for International Peace Jennifer Cafarella Craig Whiteside Institute for the Study of War Naval War College Harleen Gambhir Graeme Wood Institute for the Study of War Yale University Daveed Gartenstein- Ross Aaron Y. Zelin Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Washington Institute for Near East Policy Hassan Hassan Katherine Zimmerman Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy American Enterprise Institute Charles Lister Middle East Institute Making Peace Possible December 2016/January 2017 CONTENTS Source: Image by Peter Hermes Furian, www . iStockphoto. com. The West failed to predict the emergence of al- Qaeda in new forms across the Middle East and North Africa. It was blindsided by the ISIS sweep across Syria and Iraq, which at least temporarily changed the map of the Middle East. Both movements have skillfully continued to evolve and proliferate— and surprise. What’s next? Twenty experts from think tanks and universities across the United States explore the world’s deadliest movements, their strate- gies, the future scenarios, and policy considerations. This report reflects their analy sis and diverse views.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Armed Opposition Powerbrokers
    March 2016 Jennifer Cafarella and Genevieve Casagrande MIDDLE EAST SECURITY REPORT 29 SYRIAN ARMED OPPOSITION POWERBROKERS Cover: A rebel fighter of the Southern Front of the Free Syrian Army gestures while standing with his fellow fighter near their weapons at the front line in the north-west countryside of Deraa March 3, 2015. Syrian government forces have taken control of villages in southern Syria, state media said on Saturday, part of a campaign they started this month against insurgents posing one of the biggest remaining threats to Damascus. Picture taken March 3, 2015. REUTERS/Stringer All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ©2016 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2016 in the United States of America by the Institute for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 | Washington, DC 20036 www.understandingwar.org Jennifer Cafarella and Genevieve Casagrande MIDDLE EAST SECURITY REPORT 29 SYRIAN ARMED OPPOSITION POWERBROKERS ABOUT THE AUTHORS Jennifer Cafarella is the Evans Hanson Fellow at the Institute for the Study of War where she focuses on the Syrian Civil War and opposition groups. Her research focuses particularly on the al Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al Nusra and their military capabilities, modes of governance, and long-term strategic vision. She is the author of Likely Courses of Action in the Syrian Civil War: June-December 2015, and Jabhat al-Nusra in Syria: An Islamic Emirate for al-Qaeda.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Syria's Civil
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Browse Reports & Bookstore TERRORISM AND Make a charitable contribution HOMELAND SECURITY For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Corporation View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. RAND perspectives (PEs) present informed perspective on a timely topic that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND perspectives undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Perspective C O R P O R A T I O N Expert insights on a timely policy issue The Dynamics of Syria’s Civil War Brian Michael Jenkins Principal Observations One-third of the population has fled the country or has been displaced internally.
    [Show full text]
  • Into the Tunnels
    REPORT ARAB POLITICS BEYOND THE UPRISINGS Into the Tunnels The Rise and Fall of Syria’s Rebel Enclave in the Eastern Ghouta DECEMBER 21, 2016 — ARON LUND PAGE 1 In the sixth year of its civil war, Syria is a shattered nation, broken into political, religious, and ethnic fragments. Most of the population remains under the control of President Bashar al-Assad, whose Russian- and Iranian-backed Baʻath Party government controls the major cities and the lion’s share of the country’s densely populated coastal and central-western areas. Since the Russian military intervention that began in September 2015, Assad’s Syrian Arab Army and its Shia Islamist allies have seized ground from Sunni Arab rebel factions, many of which receive support from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, or the United States. The government now appears to be consolidating its hold on key areas. Media attention has focused on the siege of rebel-held Eastern Aleppo, which began in summer 2016, and its reconquest by government forces in December 2016.1 The rebel enclave began to crumble in November 2016. Losing its stronghold in Aleppo would be a major strategic and symbolic defeat for the insurgency, and some supporters of the uprising may conclude that they have been defeated, though violence is unlikely to subside. However, the Syrian government has also made major strides in another besieged enclave, closer to the capital. This area, known as the Eastern Ghouta, is larger than Eastern Aleppo both in terms of area and population—it may have around 450,000 inhabitants2—but it has gained very little media interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Cash Is King: Financial Sponsorship and Changing Priorities in the Syrian Civil War
    Studies in Conflict & Terrorism ISSN: 1057-610X (Print) 1521-0731 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uter20 Cash is King: Financial Sponsorship and Changing Priorities in the Syrian Civil War Anne Marie Baylouny & Creighton A. Mullins To cite this article: Anne Marie Baylouny & Creighton A. Mullins (2017): Cash is King: Financial Sponsorship and Changing Priorities in the Syrian Civil War, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1366621 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1366621 Accepted author version posted online: 25 Aug 2017. Published online: 25 Aug 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 129 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uter20 Download by: [NPS Dudley Knox Library] Date: 04 October 2017, At: 12:56 STUDIES IN CONFLICT & TERRORISM https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2017.1366621 Cash is King: Financial Sponsorship and Changing Priorities in the Syrian Civil War Anne Marie Baylounya and Creighton A. Mullinsb aNational Security Affairs, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA; bU.S. Air Force ABSTRACT The role of resources in war has been much debated. What happens when foreign patrons provide lavish amounts of cash to rebels, without mechanisms of accountability? This article analyzes three major sources of funding and their micro-level effects on insurgent-groups in the Syrian civil war. Recipients of funding demonstrated opportunism in actions, alliances, and ideologies, directly related to the funding source. Funders thus set the agenda of the war, promoting Islamist ideologies and regional over local issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Towards Terrorist Organizations in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Libya a Special Focus on Dai’Sh in Iraq
    Public Opinion Towards Terrorist Organizations in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Libya A special focus on Dai’sh in Iraq Discussion hosted by Anthony H. Cordesman, Burke Chair in Strategy, CSIS, featuring Munqith M. Dagher Independent Institute for Administration and Civil Society Studies (IIACSS) Iraq Prepared for March 4, 2015 Presentation at CSIS, Washington, D.C. Methodology • Series of F2F nation wide polls conducted in Iraq since 2003. • 3 F2F nation wide polls conducted in Libya (2012-2014) • Two F2F nation wide polls conducted in each of Yemen and Syria (2013-2014) • In depth interviews with opinion leaders from areas controlled by ISIL. Introduction • Modern militant Islamic movements started in 1979 with Khomeini’s revolution in Iran • Al Qa'ida which established to fight Soviet Union in Afghanistan was very active in Iraq between 2004-2010 • ISIL (Dai’sh) – Appeared in Syria in 2013 as one of the main players there – Used by Asad to justify the suppression of the revolution, on one hand, and to gain international support on the other hand – The beginning of ISIL activities in Iraq was in Anbar after the ignorance of central government to demonstrator’s demands Nation-wide survey 8th June 2014 Introduction • Dai’sh is the latest and most powerful incarnation of what began as an al-Qaida affiliate in Iraq following the 2003 US-led invasion. • American forces spent years and enormous resources to bring the group largely to heel before US troops pulled out of the country in December of 2011. • Since then, the region has been convulsed in political turmoil and sectarian hatred.
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Jihadi Monitoring Group
    ICT Jihadi Monitoring Group PERIODIC REVIEW Bimonthly Report Summary of Information on Jihadist Websites The First Half of September 2014 International Institute for Counter Terrorism (ICT) Additional resources are available on the ICT Website: www.ict.org.il Highlights This report summarizes notable events discussed on jihadist Web forums during the first half of September 2014. Following are the main points covered in the report: Sheikh Ayman al-Zawahiri, the leader of Al-Qaeda, announces the establishment of a new Al- Qaeda branch in the Indian subcontinent. According to him, the new branch is meant to focus on spreading the faith in the Oneness of God, liberating occupied Muslim lands, revitalizing the institution of the Caliphate, and supporting persecuted Muslims in the Indian subcontinent. Sheikh Assem Omar, the leader of the new branch, and Usama Mahmoud, the spokesperson for the branch, clarify that they are loyal to al-Zawahiri and that they will work for the sake of the Muslim people in the Indian subcontinent who are being persecuted by the regimes. The spokesperson for Al-Qaeda, Sheikh Sheikh Hussam Abd al-Rauf, claims that there is a false propaganda campaign being waged against Al-Qaeda and its leader, Sheikh Ayman al-Zawahiri. According to him, despite all of the unfounded analyses and forecasts, the organization continues to maintain its power and its control of its branches, and to expand into new arenas of jihad. According to him, local regimes are collaborating with foreign forces hostile to Islam, with the goal of repressing the civil revolutions known as the Arab Spring and thwarting the efforts of the mujahideen to impose shari’a.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Networks of Influence in the Middle East
    an strategic dossier IRAN’S NETWORKS OF INFLUENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST published by The International Institute for Strategic Studies ARUNDEL HOUSE | 6 TEMPLE PLACE | LONDON | WC2R 2PG | UK 1 an strategic dossier IRAN’S NETWORKS OF INFLUENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST The International Institute for Strategic Studies ARUNDEL HOUSE | 6 TEMPLE PLACE | LONDON | WC2R 2PG | UK DIRECTOR-GENERAL AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE Dr John Chipman This publication has been prepared by the Director-General and Chief Executive of the Institute and his staff. It incorporates commissioned contributions from recognised subject experts, which were reviewed by a range of experts in the field. The IISS would like to thank the various individuals who contributed their expertise to the compilation of this dossier. The responsibility for the contents is ours alone. The views expressed herein do not, and indeed cannot, represent a consensus of views among the worldwide membership of the Institute as a whole. First published November 2019 by the International Institute for Strategic Studies. © 2019 The International Institute for Strategic Studies cover images: Top: Background: A Lebanese Hizbullah fighter near Arsal, Lebanon, 26 July 2017 (Anwar Amro/AFP/ Getty Images); main images, top–bottom: Popular Mobilisation Units fighters launch missiles targeting the village of Salmani, south of Mosul, in Iraq’s Nineva province, 30 October 2016 (Ahmad Al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty Images); Major- General Qasem Soleimani, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attends a meeting between Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (not pictured) and the IRGC in Tehran, 18 September 2016 (by Pool/Press Office of Iranian Supreme Leader/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images); Pro-government forces at a funeral ceremony at the Sayyida Zainab mosque in Damascus, Syria, 26 April 2017 (Louai Beshara/AFP/Getty Images) Printed and bound in the UK by Hobbs the Printers Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI RSCAS Working Paper 2021/08 How Global Jihad Relocalises And
    RSC 2021/08 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Middle East Directions Programme How Global Jihad Relocalises and Where it Leads. The Case of HTS, the Former AQ Franchise in Syria Jerome Drevon and Patrick Haenni European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Middle East Directions Programm How Global Jihad Relocalises and Where it Leads. The Case of HTS, the Former AQ Franchise in Syria Jerome Drevon and Patrick Haenni EUI Working Paper RSC 2021/08 Terms of access and reuse for this work are governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC- BY 4.0) International license. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper series and number, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © Jerome Drevon and Patrick Haenni, 2021 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) International license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published in January 2021 by the European University Institute. Badia Fiesolana, via dei Roccettini 9 I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual author(s) and not those of the European University Institute. This publication is available in Open Access in Cadmus, the EUI Research Repository: https://cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics.
    [Show full text]