Persister Cells, Dormancy and Infectious Disease
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REVIEWS Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease Kim Lewis Abstract | Several well-recognized puzzles in microbiology have remained unsolved for decades. These include latent bacterial infections, unculturable microorganisms, persister cells and biofilm multidrug tolerance. Accumulating evidence suggests that these seemingly disparate phenomena result from the ability of bacteria to enter into a dormant (non-dividing) state. The molecular mechanisms that underlie the formation of dormant persister cells are now being unravelled and are the focus of this Review. Dormant Persisters were described by Joseph Bigger in 1944 in one alternative target; antibiotic modification or destruc- 1 A dormant cell has a global of the first studies on the mechanism of penicillin action . tion; antibiotic efflux; and restricted permeability to slowdown of metabolic Bigger discovered that penicillin lysed a growing popula- antibiotics9,10. It is interesting to note that all of the processes and does not divide. tion of Staphylococcus spp., but that a small number of theoretically logical possibilities of antibiotic resistance persister cells, which were not simply antibiotic-resistant seem to have been realized in nature. Importantly, all of Tolerance The ability of cells to survive mutants, inevitably survived (FIG. 1a) and proposed that these mechanisms accomplish the same aim, which is to killing by antibiotics without these were dormant, non-dividing cells. Harris Moyed prevent the antibiotic from binding to its target (FIG. 2). expressing or using resistance continued working on the problem in the 1980s and Each of these resistance mechanisms allows cells to grow mechanisms. carried out a targeted search for persister genes2–6. He at an elevated concentration of antibiotic. Bactericidal Non-proliferation treated a population of Escherichia coli with ampicillin, antibiotics kill the cell not by inhibiting the target, but A cell that does not divide. then allowed the surviving cells to grow in the absence by corrupting its function to create a toxic product. of antibiotic. After several such cycles, two colony types Aminoglycoside antibiotics kill the cell by interrupting Chaperone were identified following plating on solid media; these translation, which produces misfolded toxic peptides11. A protein that mediates the were conventional antibiotic-resistant mutants that grew Beta-lactam antibiotics, such as penicillin, inhibit pep- assembly of another polypeptide-containing in the presence of ampicillin, and mutants that produced tidoglycan synthesis, which activates, by an unknown 12 structure, but does not form persister cells at a higher frequency, but that were unable mechanism, autolysin enzymes present in the cell wall . part of the completed to grow in the presence of ampicillin. This leads to digestion of the peptidoglycan by autolysins structure, or participate in its One of these persister mutations was mapped to and cell death. Fluoroquinolones inhibit the ligase step of biological function. the hipA gene. The hipA7 allelic strain produced ~1% the DNA gyrase and topoisomerase, without affecting the persisters that survived treatment with ampicillin in preceding nicking activity. As a result, the enzymes are exponential cultures, which is approximately 1,000 times converted into endonucleases13. more persisters than the wild-type strain. In contrast to resistance, the tolerance of persisters to The recent discovery of persisters in biofilms7,8 has antibiotics might function by preventing target corruption rekindled interest in these unusual cells. Indeed, the pres- by a bactericidal agent through the blocking of the anti- ence of persister cells might be important in the aetiology biotic target(s) (FIG. 2). If persisters are dormant and have of many recalcitrant infectious diseases. In this Review, little or no cell-wall synthesis, translation or topoisomer- I will summarize the biology of persister cells and offer ase activity, then the antibiotics will bind to, but will be insights into their role in infectious disease. unable to corrupt, the function of their target molecules. Antimicrobial Discovery In this way tolerance could enable resistance to killing by Center and Department of Biology, Northeastern Multidrug resistance and multidrug tolerance antibiotics, but at the price of non-proliferation. University, 360 Huntington Numerous mechanisms of drug resistance have been Avenue, Boston, described, and in most cases we have a good under- Production of persister cells Massachusetts, 02115 USA. standing of these processes at the molecular level. The The simplest route to form a dormant persister cell e-mail: [email protected] doi:10.1038/nrmicro1557 main types of resistance are target modification by might be through the overproduction of proteins that are Published online mutation; target modification by specialized enzymatic toxic to the cell and inhibit growth. Recombinant E. coli 4 December 2006 changes; target substitution, such as expressing an cells that overproduce the chaperone DnaJ, or the PmrC 48 | JANUARY 2007 | VOLUME 5 www.nature.com/reviews/micro © 2007 Nature Publishing Group REVIEWS a unpublished observations). Whatever the mechanism, Antibiotic added the dynamics of persister formation provide an inter- 10 Regular esting insight into this strategy of persistence. Because cells 8 the highest frequency of persister formation occurs –1 Persisters 6 Resistant in the stationary phase of growth their main function mutants might be to ensure the survival of this non-growing 4 population. As persisters do not grow, it would seem Log CFU ml 2 logical for the entire stationary population to enter into this protected survival state, but this is not the 0 02468101214 case. The benefit of being a regular, dividing cell seems Time (h) to stem from its ability to rapidly resume growth, a b process that takes 1–1.5 hours longer for a dormant Lag phase Stationary phase persister cell16. Because most cells in an E. coli or Early exponential P. ae r ug ino s a stationary phase population are non- phase persisters, this indicates that the optimal individual 10 Growth strategy is not to enter into persistence, suggesting 8 Persisters –1 that the persister state is an altruistic behaviour 6 benefiting the kin. Indeed, in the rare instance that the whole population of normal cells is killed by a 4 lethal factor, the surviving persisters can propagate the Log CFU ml 2 genome that they share with their kin (BOX 1). 0 02468101214 Genetics of persister formation Time (h) Attempts to identify genes that are required for persister- Figure 1 | Formation of persister cells. a | Shows the cell formation by transposon mutagenesis were unsuc- 17,18 treatment of a population with an antibiotic, which results cessful . Such experiments are problematic owing to in cell death, leaving only persister cells or resistant the variation in the numbers of persisters identified in mutants alive. b | Shows the frequency of isolation of parallel replicates19, which leads to an unmanageable persisters as a function of the growth phase of the culture. level of false-positives and false-negatives when screen- ing a large library. An alternative method is to identify genes by gain-of-function from an expression library. protein from Salmonella entericia serovar Typhimurium However, overproduction of some proteins can result (S. typhimurium), stopped growing and became highly in toxic effects that restrict cell growth, which results tolerant to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin14. in the isolation of false-positives. It seems that standard However, this simple mechanism is unlikely to be genetic approaches are poorly suited to searching for responsible for the natural production of persisters. persister genes. Examination of the rate of E. coli persister-cell formation over time showed that few of these cells are formed in a early exponential phase, followed by a sharp increase in persister-cell formation in mid-exponential phase, + Cell death reaching a maximum of ~1% of cells forming persisters in the non-growing stationary phase (FIG. 1b). In order Antibiotic Target Target corrupted to probe whether persisters isolated during the early exponential phase of growth were introduced from b a stationary state culture inoculum, or were formed de novo, the culture was kept in early exponential + Resistance phase by repeated dilution and regrowth15. After four cycles, persister cells completely disappeared. This simple experiment rules out non-specific mechanisms c Quorum sensing The ability of bacteria to sense of persister formation and indicates that persister cells their own cell density by are preformed, rather than being produced in response + Tolerance detecting the concentration of to antibiotics. signalling molecules that have The formation of persisters rapidly increases during been released in their mid-exponential phase in several species, but the mecha- Figure 2 | Resistance versus tolerance to bactericidal environment. antibiotics. a | The antibiotic (pink) binds to the target nism that underlies this remains a puzzle. Quorum sensing (blue) altering its function, which causes cell death. b | The does not seem to have a role in persister formation, Signalling molecule target of the antibiotic has been altered so that it fails to A chemical, similar to a because the addition of spent growth medium (which bind the antibiotic and the cell becomes resistant to pheromone, that is produced would contain high concentrations of quorum-sensing by an individual