DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0612072V1 4 Dec 2006 Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0612072V1 4 Dec 2006 Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae Theory of core-collapse supernovae H.-Th. Janka1, K. Langanke2,3, A. Marek1, G. Mart´ınez-Pinedo2, B. M¨uller1 1 Max-Planck Institut f¨ur Astrophysik, Garching, Germany 2Gesellschaft f¨ur Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 3Institut f¨ur Kernphysik, Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt, Germany February 5, 2008 Abstract Advances in our understanding and the modeling of stellar core-collapse and supernova ex- plosions over the past 15 years are reviewed, concentrating on the evolution of hydrodynamical simulations, the description of weak interactions and nuclear equation of state effects, and new insights into the nucleosynthesis occurring in the early phases of the explosion, in particular the neutrino-p process. The latter is enabled by the proton-richness of the early ejecta, which was discovered because of significant progress has been made in the treatment of neutrino transport and weak interactions. This progress has led to a new generation of sophisticated Newtonian and relativistic hydrodynamics simulations in spherical symmetry. Based on these, it is now clear that the prompt bounce-shock mechanism is not the driver of supernova explosions, and that the delayed neutrino-heating mechanism can produce explosions without the aid of multi-dimensional processes only if the progenitor star has an ONeMg core inside a very dilute He-core, i.e., has a mass in the 8–10 M⊙ range. Hydrodynamic instabilities of various kinds have indeed been recognized to occur in the supernova core and to be of potential importance for the explosion. Neutrino-driven explosions, however, have been seen in two-dimensional simulations with sophisticated neutrino transport so far only when the star has a small iron core and low density in the surrounding shells as being found in stars near 10–11 M⊙. The explosion mechanism of more massive progenitors is arXiv:astro-ph/0612072v1 4 Dec 2006 still a puzzle. It might involve effects of three-dimensional hydrodynamics or might point to the relevance of rapid rotation and magnetohydrodynamics, or to still incompletely explored properties of neutrinos and the high-density equation of state. Hardly any other astrophysical event is as complex and physically diverse as the death of massive stars in a gravitational collapse and subsequent supernova explosion. All four known forces of nature are involved and play an important role in extreme regimes of conditions. Relativistic plasma dynamics in a strong gravitational field sets the stage, weak interactions govern the energy and lepton number loss of the system via the transport of neutrinos from regions of very high opacities to the free-streaming regime, electromagnetic and strong interactions determine the thermodynamic properties, and nuclear and weak interactions change the composition of the stellar gas. Supernova explosions thus offer a fascinating playground of physics on most different scales of length and time and also provide a testbed for new or exotic phenomena. Naturally, these spectacular astrophysical events have attracted — and have deserved — the interest and attention of researchers with very different backgrounds. To the advantage of the field, also Hans Bethe has preserved for many years his interest in the large diversity of physics problems posed by supernovae. 1 In this article we will discuss some of the progress that has been made in the simulations of stellar core collapse and supernova explosions on the one hand, and in the description of the microphysics input of such models on the other, since Hans Bethe published his grand review article in 1990 [1]. The field is very broad and has experienced also a great expansion after long-soft gamma-ray bursts have been discovered to be linked to extraordinarily energetic explosions of massive stars. A single article can therefore hardly cover all interesting developments satisfactorily. For recent reviews of the theory and observations of stellar collapse events, focussing on different aspects, see Refs. [2, 3, 4, 5]. We will concentrate here on some selected topics, chosen according to our preference but also by their links to contributions from Hans Bethe and his coworkers. After giving a summary of the phys- ical processes and evolutionary stages that lead from stellar core collapse to supernova explosion, we will briefly review the current status of modeling supernovae and of our present understanding of the explosion mechanism, in particular we will also highlight the open ends of the current research. In the subsequent parts of our article we will then concentrate on nuclear and weak interaction physics that plays an important role for developing better numerical models, and we will report new insights brought by such model improvements about the nucleosynthesis during supernova explosions. 1 The current picture of stellar collapse and explosion At the end of hydrostatic burning, a massive star consists of concentric shells that are the relics of its previous burning phases (hydrogen, helium, carbon, neon, oxygen, silicon). Iron is the final stage of nuclear fusion in hydrostatic burning, as the synthesis of any heavier element from lighter elements does not release energy; rather, energy must be used up. When the iron core, formed in the center of the massive star, grows by silicon shell burning to a mass around the Chandrasekhar mass limit of about 1.44 solar masses, electron degeneracy pressure cannot longer stabilize the core and it collapses. This starts what is called a core-collapse supernova in course of which the star explodes and parts of the star’s heavy-element core and of its outer shells are ejected into the Interstellar Medium. The onset of the collapse and the infall dynamics are very sensitive to the entropy and to the number of leptons per baryon, Ye [6]. In turn, these two quantities are mainly determined by weak interaction processes, electron capture and β decay. First, in the early stage of the collapse, Ye decreases by electron capture on (Fe-peak) nuclei, reactions which are energetically favorable when the electrons have Fermi energies of a few MeV at the densities involved. This reduces the increase of the electron pressure with density, thus accelerating the collapse, and shifts the distribution of nuclei present in the core to more neutron-rich material (Fig. 1, upper left panel). Second, many of the nuclei present can also β decay. While this process is quite unimportant compared to electron capture for initial Ye values around 0.5, it becomes increasingly competative for neutron-rich nuclei due to an increase in phase space related to larger Qβ values. Electron capture, β decay, and partial photodisintegration of iron-group nuclei to alpha particles cost the core energy and reduce its electron density. As a consequence, the collapse is accelerated. An 12 3 important change in the physics of the collapse occurs, as the density reaches ρtrap 10 g/cm (Fig. 1, upper right panel). Then neutrinos are essentially trapped in the core, because their≈ diffusion time (due to coherent conservative scattering on nuclei) becomes larger than the collapse time [1]. After neutrino 14 3 trapping, the collapse proceeds essentially homologously [7], until nuclear densities (ρ0 10 g/cm ) are reached. Since nuclear matter has a much lower compressibility, the homologous core≈ decelerates and bounces in response to the increased nuclear matter pressure. This drives a shock wave into the outer core, i.e. the region of the iron core which lies outside of the homologous core and in the meantime has continued to fall inwards at supersonic speed. 2 R [km] Initial Phase of Collapse R [km] Neutrino Trapping (t ~ 0) δ (t ~ 0.1s, c ~10¹² g/cm³) R Fe ~ 3000 RFe ν e ν e ν e ~ 100 Si Si ν e Fe, Ni ν Fe, Ni e ν e M(r) [M ] M(r) [M ] 0.5 1.0 ~ MCh 0.5 Mhc 1.0 heavy nuclei Si−burning shell Si−burning shell R [km] Shock Propagation and ν Burst R [km] Bounce and Shock Formation e δ < δ (t ~ 0.11s, c ∼ 2 o) R (t ~ 0.12s) RFe Fe R ~ 100 km ν ν s e radius of e shock Rν ν formation e ν position of e shock Si Si ν ~ 10 e formation ν e Fe Fe, Ni ν free n, e p Ni ν e M(r) [M ] 0.5 1.0 M(r) [M ] 0.5 1.0 nuclear matter nuclear matter δ ( δ > ) nuclei nuclei ∼ ο Si−burning shell Si−burning shell ν Shock Stagnation and Heating, R [km] Neutrino Cooling and Neutrino− R [km] Explosion (t ~ 0.2s) 105 Driven Wind (t ~ 10s) Rs ~ 200 ν ,ν 4 ν ,ν e,µ,τ e,µ,τ 10 e,µ,τ e,µ,τ Ni R ~ 100 3 g free n, p Si 10 Si p R ν ~ 50 ν 2 α He e 10 n ν ,ν r−process? ν ,µ,τ ,ν ,µ,τ ν e,µ,τ e,µ,τ O e e e R ns ~ 10 Rν M(r) [M ] α,n M(r) [M ] PNS1.3 gain layer 1.5 PNS 1.4 9 3 n, p α,n, Be, cooling layer 12 C, seed Figure 1: Schematic representation of the evolutionary stages from stellar core collapse through the onset of the supernova explosion to the neutrino-driven wind during the neutrino-cooling phase of the proto-neutron star (PNS). The panels display the dynamical conditions in their upper half, with arrows representing velocity vectors. The nuclear composition as well as the nuclear and weak processes are indicated in the lower half of each panel. The horizontal axis gives mass information. MCh means the Chandrasekhar mass and Mhc the mass of the subsonically collapsing, homologous inner core. The vertical axis shows corresponding radii, with RFe, Rs, Rg, Rns, and Rν being the iron core radius, shock radius, gain radius, neutron star radius, and neutrinosphere, respectively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Formation of Brown Dwarfs 459
    Whitworth et al.: The Formation of Brown Dwarfs 459 The Formation of Brown Dwarfs: Theory Anthony Whitworth Cardiff University Matthew R. Bate University of Exeter Åke Nordlund University of Copenhagen Bo Reipurth University of Hawaii Hans Zinnecker Astrophysikalisches Institut, Potsdam We review five mechanisms for forming brown dwarfs: (1) turbulent fragmentation of molec- ular clouds, producing very-low-mass prestellar cores by shock compression; (2) collapse and fragmentation of more massive prestellar cores; (3) disk fragmentation; (4) premature ejection of protostellar embryos from their natal cores; and (5) photoerosion of pre-existing cores over- run by HII regions. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. Their relative importance probably depends on environment, and should be judged by their ability to reproduce the brown dwarf IMF, the distribution and kinematics of newly formed brown dwarfs, the binary statis- tics of brown dwarfs, the ability of brown dwarfs to retain disks, and hence their ability to sustain accretion and outflows. This will require more sophisticated numerical modeling than is presently possible, in particular more realistic initial conditions and more realistic treatments of radiation transport, angular momentum transport, and magnetic fields. We discuss the mini- mum mass for brown dwarfs, and how brown dwarfs should be distinguished from planets. 1. INTRODUCTION form a smooth continuum with those of low-mass H-burn- ing stars. Understanding how brown dwarfs form is there- The existence of brown dwarfs was first proposed on the- fore the key to understanding what determines the minimum oretical grounds by Kumar (1963) and Hayashi and Nakano mass for star formation. In section 3 we review the basic (1963).
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation and Early Evolution of Very Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs Held at ESO Headquarters, Garching, Germany, 11–14 October 2011
    Astronomical News and spectroscopic surveys identifying the at the ELTs, together with encouraging emphasised the power of emerging coun- first galaxies, rare quasars, supernovae some explicitly high-risk projects. It was tries and public outreach for investments and gamma-ray bursts. noted that is very important to retain a in astronomical research and that diver- broad range of facilities, including sity in facilities and astronomical capabili- A lively discussion arose on data policy 4-metre- and 8-metre-class telescopes, ties should be retained together with and data mining for surveys and ELTs. to be used as survey facilities, to pro- large-scale projects. Ellis reminded us Most participants agreed that proprietary mote small projects, and to train young that we cannot plan the future in detail time should be at the minimum level but astronomers. All the long-term flagship and so optimism, versatility and creativity sufficient to guarantee intellectual owner- projects should try to involve more stu- remain the key attributes for success. ship and a satisfactory progress of the dents and young researchers, allowing surveys and the ELTs. Others proposed them to attend science working com- All the presentations and the conference to have the data public from the begin- mittees, and communicating the outcome picture are available at the conference ning. In order to facilitate data mining, it of the major high-level decisional meet- website: http://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/ was proposed that all data provided by ings to them. Furthermore, it was pro- 2011/feedgiant. the surveys and the ELTs should be Vir- posed that at least one young astrono- tual Observatory compliant from the out- mer should be included in each of the set.
    [Show full text]
  • AST301 the Lives of the Stars
    AST301 The Lives of the Stars A Tale of Two Forces: Pressure vs Gravity I. The Sun as a Star What we know about the Sun •Angular Diameter: q = 32 arcmin (from observations) •Solar Constant: f = 1.4 x 106 erg/sec/cm2 (from observations) •Distance: d = 1.5 x 108 km (1 AU). (from Kepler's Third Law and the trigonometric parallax of Venus) •Luminosity: L = 4 x 1033 erg/s. (from the inverse-square law: L = 4p d2 f) •Radius: R = 7 x 105 km. (from geometry: R = p d) •Mass: M = 2 x 1033 gm. (from Newton's version of Kepler's Third Law, M = (4p2/G) d3/P2) •Temperature: T = 5800 K. (from the black body law: L = 4pR2 σ T4) •Composition: about 74% Hydrogen, 24% Helium, and 2% everything else (by mass). (from spectroscopy) What Makes the Sun Shine? Inside the Sun Far Side Gary Larson Possible Sources of Sunlight • Chemical combustion – A Sun made of C+O: 4000 years • Gravitational Contraction – Convert gravitational potential energy – T = U/L = GM82R8/L8 ~ 107 years • Accretion – Limitless, but M8 increases 3% / 106 years • Nuclear Fusion – Good for ~1010 years How Fusion Works E=mc2 • 4 H ⇒ He4 + energy • The mass of 4 H atoms exceeds the mass of a He atom by 0.7%. • Every second, the Sun converts 6x108 tons of H into 5.96x108 tons of He. • The Sun loses 4x106 tons of mass every second. • At this rate, the Sun can maintain its present luminosity for about 1011 years. • 1010 or 1011 years ??? Nuclear Fusion Proton-Proton (PP I) reaction Releases 26.7 MeV 10 < Tcore < 14 MK How Fusion Works Source: Wikipedia Beyond PP I PP II: dominates for 14 < Tcore < 23 MK • 3He + 4He ⇒ 7Be + g 7 - 7 • Be + e ⇒ Li + ne + g • 7Li +p+ ⇒ 24He + g • 16% of L8 PP III: dominates for Tcore > 23 MK • 3He + 4He ⇒ 7Be + g • 7Be + p+ ⇒ 8B + g 8 8 + • B ⇒ Be + e + ne • 8Be ⇒ 24He • 0.02% of L8 Nuclear Timescale • 1010 years • Sun has brightened by 30% in 4.5 Gyr • Photons take 105 – 106 yrs to diffuse out – Gamma-rays thermalize to optical photons How do we know? • The p-p reaction also produces neutrinos.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Astrophysics: the Unfinished Quest for the Origin of the Elements
    Nuclear astrophysics: the unfinished quest for the origin of the elements Jordi Jos´e Departament de F´ısica i Enginyeria Nuclear, EUETIB, Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain; Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain E-mail: [email protected] Christian Iliadis Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA; Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Half a century has passed since the foundation of nuclear astrophysics. Since then, this discipline has reached its maturity. Today, nuclear astrophysics constitutes a multidisciplinary crucible of knowledge that combines the achievements in theoretical astrophysics, observational astronomy, cosmochemistry and nuclear physics. New tools and developments have revolutionized our understanding of the origin of the elements: supercomputers have provided astrophysicists with the required computational capabilities to study the evolution of stars in a multidimensional framework; the emergence of high-energy astrophysics with space-borne observatories has opened new windows to observe the Universe, from a novel panchromatic perspective; cosmochemists have isolated tiny pieces of stardust embedded in primitive meteorites, giving clues on the processes operating in stars as well as on the way matter condenses to form solids; and nuclear physicists have measured reactions near stellar energies, through the combined efforts using stable and radioactive ion beam facilities. This review provides comprehensive insight into the nuclear history of the Universe arXiv:1107.2234v1 [astro-ph.SR] 12 Jul 2011 and related topics: starting from the Big Bang, when the ashes from the primordial explosion were transformed to hydrogen, helium, and few trace elements, to the rich variety of nucleosynthesis mechanisms and sites in the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Evolution
    Stellar Astrophysics: Stellar Evolution 1 Stellar Evolution Update date: December 14, 2010 With the understanding of the basic physical processes in stars, we now proceed to study their evolution. In particular, we will focus on discussing how such processes are related to key characteristics seen in the HRD. 1 Star Formation From the virial theorem, 2E = −Ω, we have Z M 3kT M GMr = dMr (1) µmA 0 r for the hydrostatic equilibrium of a gas sphere with a total mass M. Assuming that the density is constant, the right side of the equation is 3=5(GM 2=R). If the left side is smaller than the right side, the cloud would collapse. For the given chemical composition, ρ and T , this criterion gives the minimum mass (called Jeans mass) of the cloud to undergo a gravitational collapse: 3 1=2 5kT 3=2 M > MJ ≡ : (2) 4πρ GµmA 5 For typical temperatures and densities of large molecular clouds, MJ ∼ 10 M with −1=2 a collapse time scale of tff ≈ (Gρ) . Such mass clouds may be formed in spiral density waves and other density perturbations (e.g., caused by the expansion of a supernova remnant or superbubble). What exactly happens during the collapse depends very much on the temperature evolution of the cloud. Initially, the cooling processes (due to molecular and dust radiation) are very efficient. If the cooling time scale tcool is much shorter than tff , −1=2 the collapse is approximately isothermal. As MJ / ρ decreases, inhomogeneities with mass larger than the actual MJ will collapse by themselves with their local tff , different from the initial tff of the whole cloud.
    [Show full text]
  • (NASA/Chandra X-Ray Image) Type Ia Supernova Remnant – Thermonuclear Explosion of a White Dwarf
    Stellar Evolution Card Set Description and Links 1. Tycho’s SNR (NASA/Chandra X-ray image) Type Ia supernova remnant – thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2011/tycho2/ 2. Protostar formation (NASA/JPL/Caltech/Spitzer/R. Hurt illustration) A young star/protostar forming within a cloud of gas and dust http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/images/1852-ssc2007-14d-Planet-Forming-Disk- Around-a-Baby-Star 3. The Crab Nebula (NASA/Chandra X-ray/Hubble optical/Spitzer IR composite image) A type II supernova remnant with a millisecond pulsar stellar core http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2009/crab/ 4. Cygnus X-1 (NASA/Chandra/M Weiss illustration) A stellar mass black hole in an X-ray binary system with a main sequence companion star http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2011/cygx1/ 5. White dwarf with red giant companion star (ESO/M. Kornmesser illustration/video) A white dwarf accreting material from a red giant companion could result in a Type Ia supernova http://www.eso.org/public/videos/eso0943b/ 6. Eight Burst Nebula (NASA/Hubble optical image) A planetary nebula with a white dwarf and companion star binary system in its center http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap150607.html 7. The Carina Nebula star-formation complex (NASA/Hubble optical image) A massive and active star formation region with newly forming protostars and stars http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic0707b/ 8. NGC 6826 (Chandra X-ray/Hubble optical composite image) A planetary nebula with a white dwarf stellar core in its center http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2012/pne/ 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Silicon-Burning Process
    Silicon-burning process In astrophysics, silicon burning is a very brief[1] sequence of nuclear fusion reactions that occur in massive stars with a minimum of about 8-11 solar masses. Silicon burning is the final stage of fusion for massive stars that have run out of the fuels that power them for their long lives in the main sequence on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. It follows the previous stages of hydrogen, helium, carbon, neon and oxygen burning processes. Silicon burning begins when gravitational contraction raises the star's core temperature to 2.7–3.5 billion Kelvin (GK). The exact temperature depends on mass. When a star has completed the silicon-burning phase, no further fusion is possible. The star catastrophically collapses and may explode in what is known as a Type II supernova. Contents Nuclear fusion sequence and silicon photodisintegration Binding energy See also Notes References External links Nuclear fusion sequence and silicon photodisintegration After a star completes the oxygen burning process, its core is composed primarily of silicon and sulfur.[2][3] If it has sufficiently high mass, it further contracts until its core reaches temperatures in the range of 2.7–3.5 GK (230–300 keV). At these temperatures, silicon and other elements can photodisintegrate, emitting a proton or an alpha particle.[2] Silicon burning proceeds by photodisintegration rearrangement,[4] which creates new elements by adding one of these freed alpha particles[2] (the equivalent of a helium nucleus) per capture step in the following sequence (photoejection of alphas not shown): 28 + 4 → 32 14Si 2He 16S 32 + 4 → 36 16S 2He 18Ar 36 + 4 → 40 18Ar 2He 20Ca 40 + 4 → 44 20Ca 2He 22Ti 44 + 4 → 48 22Ti 2He 24Cr 48 + 4 → 52 24Cr 2He 26Fe 52 + 4 → 56 26Fe 2He 28Ni 56 + 4 → 60 [nb 1] 28Ni 2He 30Zn The silicon-burning sequence lasts about one day before being struck by the shock wave that was launched by the core collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Part 2: Low-Energy Nuclear Physics
    BNL-113453-2017-JA White paper on nuclear astrophysics and low-energy nuclear physics Part 2: Low-energy nuclear physics Mark A. Riley, Charlotte Elster, Joe Carlson, Michael P. Carpenter, Richard Casten, Paul Fallon, Alexandra Gade, Carl Gross, Gaute Hagen, Anna C. Hayes, Douglas W. Higinbotham, Calvin R. Howell, Charles J. Horowitz, Kate L. Jones, Filip G. Kondev, Suzanne Lapi, Augusto Macchiavelli, Elizabeth A. McCutchen, Joe Natowitz, Witold Nazarewicz, Thomas Papenbrock, Sanjay Reddy, Martin J. Savage, Guy Savard, Bradley M. Sherrill, Lee G. Sobotka, Mark A. Stoyer, M. Betty Tsang, Kai Vetter, Ingo Wiedenhoever, Alan H. Wuosmaa, Sherry Yennello Submitted to Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics January 13, 2017 National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP) (SC-26) Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No.DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Supernova Explosions and Remnants Stellar Structure
    Supernova Explosions and Remnants stellar structure For a 25 solar mass star, the duration of each stage is stellar corpses: the core When the central iron core continues to grow and approaches Mch , two processes begin: nuclear photodisintegration and neutronization. Nuclear photodisintegration: The temperature is high enough for energetic photons to be abundant and get absorbed in the endothermic reaction: with an energy consumption of 124 MeV. The Helium nuclei are further unbound: consuming 28.3 MeV(the binding energy of a He nucleus). The total energy of the star is reduced per nucleon by With about 10 57 protons in a Chandrasekhar mass, this corresponds to a total energy loss of stellar corpses: the core Neutronization: The large densities in the core lead to a large increase in the rates of processes such as This neutronization depletes the core of electrons and their supporting degeneracy pressure, as well as energy, which is carried off by neutrinos. The two processes lead, in principle, to an almost total loss of thermal pressure support and to an unrestrained collapse of the core of a star on a free-fall timescale: In practice, at these high densities, the mean free path for neutrino scattering becomes of order the core radius. This slows down the energy loss, and hence the collapse time to a few seconds. core collapse supernovae As the collapse proceeds and the density and the temperature increase, the reaction becomes common, and is infrequently offset by leading to a equilibrium ratio of densities Thus most nucleons become neutrons review article type Ia supernovae.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Evolution: Evolution Off the Main Sequence
    Evolution of a Low-Mass Star Stellar Evolution: (< 8 M , focus on 1 M case) Evolution off the Main Sequence sun sun - All H converted to He in core. - Core too cool for He burning. Contracts. Main Sequence Lifetimes Heats up. Most massive (O and B stars): millions of years - H burns in shell around core: "H-shell burning phase". Stars like the Sun (G stars): billions of years - Tremendous energy produced. Star must Low mass stars (K and M stars): a trillion years! expand. While on Main Sequence, stellar core has H -> He fusion, by p-p - Star now a "Red Giant". Diameter ~ 1 AU! chain in stars like Sun or less massive. In more massive stars, 9 Red Giant “CNO cycle” becomes more important. - Phase lasts ~ 10 years for 1 MSun star. - Example: Arcturus Red Giant Star on H-R Diagram Eventually: Core Helium Fusion - Core shrinks and heats up to 108 K, helium can now burn into carbon. "Triple-alpha process" 4He + 4He -> 8Be + energy 8Be + 4He -> 12C + energy - First occurs in a runaway process: "the helium flash". Energy from fusion goes into re-expanding and cooling the core. Takes only a few seconds! This slows fusion, so star gets dimmer again. - Then stable He -> C burning. Still have H -> He shell burning surrounding it. - Now star on "Horizontal Branch" of H-R diagram. Lasts ~108 years for 1 MSun star. More massive less massive Helium Runs out in Core Horizontal branch star structure -All He -> C. Not hot enough -for C fusion. - Core shrinks and heats up.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleosynthesis •Light Element Processes •Neutron Capture Processes •LEPP and P Nuclei •Explosive C-Burning •Explosive H-Burning •Degenerate Environments
    Lecture 21: Nucleosynthesis •Light element processes •Neutron capture processes •LEPP and P nuclei •Explosive C-burning •Explosive H-burning •Degenerate environments Lecture 21: Ohio University PHYS7501, Fall 2017, Z. Meisel ([email protected]) Nuclear Astrophysics: Nuclear physics from dripline to dripline •The diverse sets of conditions in astrophysical environments leads to a variety of nuclear reaction sequences •The goal of nuclear astrophysics is to identify, reduce, and/or remove the nuclear physics uncertainties to which models of astrophysical environments are most sensitive A.Arcones et al. Prog.Theor.Part.Phys. (2017) 2 In the beginning: Big Bang Nucleosynthesis • From the expansion of the early universe and the cosmic microwave background (CMB), we know the initial universe was cool enough to form nuclei but hot enough to have nuclear reactions from the first several seconds to the first several minutes • Starting with neutrons and protons, the resulting reaction S. Weinberg, The First Three Minutes (1977) sequence is the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) reaction network • Reactions primarily involve neutrons, isotopes of H, He, Li, and Be, but some reaction flow extends up to C • For the most part (we’ll elaborate in a moment), the predicted abundances agree with observations of low-metallicity stars and primordial gas clouds • The agreement between BBN, the CMB, and the universe expansion rate is known as the Concordance Cosmology Coc & Vangioni, IJMPE (2017) 3 BBN open questions & Predictions • Notable discrepancies exist between BBN predictions (using constraints on the astrophysical conditions provided by the CMB) and observations of primordial abundances • The famous “lithium problem” is the several-sigma discrepancy in the 7Li abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroseismology
    Asteroseismology Gerald Handler Copernicus Astronomical Center, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland Email: [email protected] Abstract Asteroseismology is the determination of the interior structures of stars by using their oscillations as seismic waves. Simple explanations of the astrophysical background and some basic theoretical considerations needed in this rapidly evolving field are followed by introductions to the most important concepts and methods on the basis of example. Previous and potential applications of asteroseismology are reviewed and future trends are attempted to be foreseen. Introduction: variable and pulsating stars Nearly all the physical processes that determine the structure and evolution of stars occur in their (deep) interiors. The production of nuclear energy that powers stars takes place in their cores for most of their lifetime. The effects of the physical processes that modify the simplest models of stellar evolution, such as mixing and diffusion, also predominantly take place in the inside of stars. The light that we receive from the stars is the main information that astronomers can use to study the universe. However, the light of the stars is radiated away from their surfaces, carrying no memory of its origin in the deep interior. Therefore it would seem that there is no way that the analysis of starlight tells us about the physics going on in the unobservable stellar interiors. However, there are stars that reveal more about themselves than others. Variable stars are objects for which one can observe time-dependent light output, on a time scale shorter arXiv:1205.6407v1 [astro-ph.SR] 29 May 2012 than that of evolutionary changes.
    [Show full text]