arXiv:astro-ph/0612072v1 4 Dec 2006 datg ftefil,as asBtehspeevdfrmany for supernovae. wi preserved by has researchers posed Bethe problems of Hans physics attention also of field, and the interest a of spectacular the advantage these — Naturally, deserved phenomena. have o exotic stellar scales or the different new most of for on composition physics of v the playground of change fascinating regions interactions from determin weak neutrinos interactions and of strong and transport electromagnetic the regime, via interact weak system stage, the the of sets regimes of field extreme gravitational in strong role a important supernovain an subsequent play and and involved collapse are gravitational a in stars adyayohratohscleeti scmlxadphysi and complex as is event astrophysical other any Hardly .T.Janka H.-Th. rcse nyi h rgntrsa a nOegcr insid core ONeMg 8–10 an the has star in progenitor s the of if explosion only driver generat processes produce the can not new mechanism is a neutrino-heating mechanism delayed to bounce-shock s prompt led spherical the has in that t simulations progress hydrodynamics in This relativistic made and proton-ric been interactions. the has weak by progress and enabled significant is of ph latter because early discovered The the in process. nucl occurring neutrino-p and nucleosynthesis interactions concentrating the weak into reviewed, of insights are description years the 15 simulations, past the over plosions fnurnsadtehg-est qaino state. of equation high-density the and three-dimensiona t neutrinos or of magnetohydrodynamics, of effects and involve rotation rapid might of It relevance puzzle. a still rnpr ofrol hntesa a ml rncr n lo and core 10–11 iron near small stars a in has found star being sim the when as two-dimensional importance only in potential far seen so of transport been be to have and however, core explosions, supernova the in occur dacsi u nesadn n h oeigo tla co stellar of modeling the and understanding our in Advances 3 ntttfu enhsk ehiceUniversit¨at Technische Darmst f¨ur Kernphysik, Institut 2 eelcatfu cwroefrcug amtd,Germ Darmstadt, f¨ur Schwerionenforschung, Gesellschaft 1 M a-lnkIsiu ¨rAtohsk acig Germany Garching, f¨ur Astrophysik, Institut Max-Planck ⊙ ag.Hdoyai ntblte fvrosknshv in have kinds various of instabilities Hydrodynamic range. 1 .Langanke K. , hoyo oeclas supernovae core-collapse of Theory M 2 ⊙ , eray5 2008 5, February 3 h xlso ehns fmr asv rgntr is progenitors massive more of mechanism explosion The . .Marek A. , Abstract 1 1 .Mart´ınez-Pinedo G. , osgvr h nryadlpo ubrloss number lepton and energy the govern ions h hroyai rpris n nuclear and properties, thermodynamic the e mer.Bsdo hs,i snwclear now is it these, on Based ymmetry. eghadtm n lopoieatestbed a provide also and time and length f xlso.Alfu nw ocso nature of forces known four All explosion. yrdnmc rmgtpitt the to point might or hydrodynamics l sso h xlso,i atclrthe particular in explosion, the of ases a qaino tt ffcs n new and effects, state of equation ear tohscleet aeatatd—and — attracted have events strophysical ihu h i fmulti-dimensional of aid the without s tl nopeeyepoe properties explored incompletely still o eydlt ecr,ie,hsamass a has i.e., He-core, dilute very a e odtos eaiitcpam dynamics plasma Relativistic conditions. ns fteeryeet,wihwas which ejecta, early the of hness a.Sproaepoin hsoe a offer thus explosions Supernova gas. ltoswt ohsiae neutrino sophisticated with ulations r ihoaiist h free-streaming the to opacities high ery nteeouino hydrodynamical of evolution the on hvr ieetbcgons othe To backgrounds. different very th eteteto etiotransport neutrino of treatment he er i neeti h ag diversity large the in interest his years est ntesronigshells surrounding the in density w o h xlso.Neutrino-driven explosion. the for proaepoin,adta the that and explosions, upernova al ies stedaho massive of death the as diverse cally o fspitctdNewtonian sophisticated of ion eclas n uenv ex- supernova and re-collapse edbe eonzdto recognized been deed d,Germany adt, 2 .M¨uller B. , any 1 In this article we will discuss some of the progress that has been made in the simulations of stellar core collapse and supernova explosions on the one hand, and in the description of the microphysics input of such models on the other, since Hans Bethe published his grand review article in 1990 [1]. The field is very broad and has experienced also a great expansion after long-soft gamma-ray bursts have been discovered to be linked to extraordinarily energetic explosions of massive stars. A single article can therefore hardly cover all interesting developments satisfactorily. For recent reviews of the theory and observations of stellar collapse events, focussing on different aspects, see Refs. [2, 3, 4, 5]. We will concentrate here on some selected topics, chosen according to our preference but also by their links to contributions from Hans Bethe and his coworkers. After giving a summary of the phys- ical processes and evolutionary stages that lead from stellar core collapse to supernova explosion, we will briefly review the current status of modeling supernovae and of our present understanding of the explosion mechanism, in particular we will also highlight the open ends of the current research. In the subsequent parts of our article we will then concentrate on nuclear and weak interaction physics that plays an important role for developing better numerical models, and we will report new insights brought by such model improvements about the nucleosynthesis during supernova explosions.
1 The current picture of stellar collapse and explosion
At the end of hydrostatic burning, a massive star consists of concentric shells that are the relics of its previous burning phases (hydrogen, helium, carbon, neon, oxygen, silicon). Iron is the final stage of nuclear fusion in hydrostatic burning, as the synthesis of any heavier element from lighter elements does not release energy; rather, energy must be used up. When the iron core, formed in the center of the massive star, grows by silicon shell burning to a mass around the Chandrasekhar mass limit of about 1.44 solar masses, electron degeneracy pressure cannot longer stabilize the core and it collapses. This starts what is called a core-collapse supernova in course of which the star explodes and parts of the star’s heavy-element core and of its outer shells are ejected into the Interstellar Medium. The onset of the collapse and the infall dynamics are very sensitive to the entropy and to the number of leptons per baryon, Ye [6]. In turn, these two quantities are mainly determined by weak interaction processes, electron capture and β decay. First, in the early stage of the collapse, Ye decreases by electron capture on (Fe-peak) nuclei, reactions which are energetically favorable when the electrons have Fermi energies of a few MeV at the densities involved. This reduces the increase of the electron pressure with density, thus accelerating the collapse, and shifts the distribution of nuclei present in the core to more neutron-rich material (Fig. 1, upper left panel). Second, many of the nuclei present can also β decay. While this process is quite unimportant compared to electron capture for initial Ye values around 0.5, it becomes increasingly competative for neutron-rich nuclei due to an increase in phase space related to larger Qβ values. Electron capture, β decay, and partial photodisintegration of iron-group nuclei to alpha particles cost the core energy and reduce its electron density. As a consequence, the collapse is accelerated. An 12 3 important change in the physics of the collapse occurs, as the density reaches ρtrap 10 g/cm (Fig. 1, upper right panel). Then neutrinos are essentially trapped in the core, because their≈ diffusion time (due to coherent conservative scattering on nuclei) becomes larger than the collapse time [1]. After neutrino 14 3 trapping, the collapse proceeds essentially homologously [7], until nuclear densities (ρ0 10 g/cm ) are reached. Since nuclear matter has a much lower compressibility, the homologous core≈ decelerates and bounces in response to the increased nuclear matter pressure. This drives a shock wave into the outer core, i.e. the region of the iron core which lies outside of the homologous core and in the meantime has continued to fall inwards at supersonic speed.
2
R [km] Initial Phase of Collapse R [km] Neutrino Trapping (t ~ 0) δ (t ~ 0.1s, c ~10¹² g/cm³) R Fe ~ 3000 RFe ν e ν e ν e ~ 100 Si Si ν e Fe, Ni ν Fe, Ni e ν e M(r) [M ] M(r) [M ] 0.5 1.0 ~ MCh 0.5 Mhc 1.0 heavy nuclei Si−burning shell Si−burning shell
R [km] Shock Propagation and ν Burst
R [km] Bounce and Shock Formation e
δ < δ (t ~ 0.11s, c ∼ 2 o) R (t ~ 0.12s) RFe Fe R ~ 100 km ν ν s e radius of e shock Rν