Behind the Mask: Story of the People Who Risk Everything to Save Animals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Behind the Mask: Story of the People Who Risk Everything to Save Animals Behind The Mask: Story Of The People Who Risk Everything To Save Animals Captures the hearts and souls of men and women who unveil their individual struggles for Animal Liberation. The Animal Liberation Front, comprised of clandestine animal rights activists, is now labeled the number one domestic terrorist threat by the FBI. Director Shannon Keith goes Behind the Mask and captures the hearts and souls of men and women who unveil their individual struggles for Animal Liberation. Who are these "animal liberationists" and why do they believe that breaking the law is the best way to help animals? What inspires them to challenge the status quo, fight against all odds, and endure public reproach? Behind the Mask exposes never-before-seen footage that reveals the extent to which these individuals will go to save the lives of animals. People of all ages and backgrounds, from all over the globe, tell their tales of liberation, incarceration, sacrifice and determination, while exclusive underground footage reveals heart-thumping action sure to leave you wondering, who are these people...? Featuring: Keith Mann, John Feldman, Rod Coronado, Kevin Jonas, Steven Best, Chris DeRose, Melanie Arnold, Ingrid Newkirk, Rich Mclellan, Ronnie Lee, Paul Watson and Jerry Vlasak. Title Behind The Mask: Story Of The People Who Risk Everything To Save Animals Selection # MVDV4781 UPC 760137478195 Prebook 8/26/2008 Street Date 09/02/08 Retail $19.95 Genre Documentary Run Time 72 mins Box Lot 30 Label PM PRESS Audio Stereo Format DVD 800.888.0486 F 610.650.9102 PO Box 280, Oaks, PA 19456 www.MVDb2b.com Publicity: Clint Weiler 610.650.8200 x115 [email protected].
Recommended publications
  • Stronger, Together
    T R O N G E S —Together— R 2015 Annual Report 2 COMMUNITY BRIDGES | COMMUNITYBRIDGES.ORG COMMUNITY BRIDGES PUENTES DE LA COMUNIDAD STRONGER, TOGETHER Dear Friend, With nearly 500 nonprofits in Santa Cruz County alone, we thank you for choosing Community Bridges. We understand and value your commitment to us, and we don’t take it for granted. We know how hard you work for your dollar, and we promise to use it in the most effective way possible. Our goal is to work together to accomplish more for our community at a lower cost. We know that while each of our 10 programs is remarkable on their own, together, we’re unstoppable. Every day, your support makes it possible to empower seniors, increase access to medical care and good nutrition, and give children a better chance at life through education and family support. As you’ll see in this report, 2015 was an amazing year. We came together more than ever before, consolidating resources across our programs to improve services for our community. We helped more than 27,000 local kids, families and seniors in need live their best lives. And your support made all of it possible. Thank you for joining us in this mission that touches every part of the Santa Cruz County communities we hold so dear. With your continued support in 2016, we can do even more. Thank you, Raymon Cancino Linda Fawcett Chief Executive Officer Board Chair STRONGER, TOGETHER | COMMUNITYBRIDGES.ORG 3 THE IMPACT OF OUR 10 PROGRAMS It's amazing what we can accomplish together: ople we each pe ed he T 6,555 fAmiliES e av e g 13,265 3,000 t w ChildrEn/yOuTh pEOplE WiTh r diSABiliTiES po up 2,537 e SEniOrS h 2,000 T nurSing mothErS 300 vETEr EXpEri300EnCing AnS hOmElessNESS 1,400 SinglE mothEr S 36Q % live in north 52% County.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregating the Scare from the Greens
    DISAGGREGATING THE SCARE FROM THE GREENS Lee Hall*† INTRODUCTION When the Vermont Law Review graciously asked me to contribute to this Symposium focusing on the tension between national security and fundamental values, specifically for a segment on ecological and animal- related activism as “the threat of unpopular ideas,” it seemed apt to ask a basic question about the title: Why should we come to think of reverence for life or serious concern for the Earth that sustains us as “unpopular ideas”? What we really appear to be saying is that the methods used, condoned, or promoted by certain people are unpopular. So before we proceed further, intimidation should be disaggregated from respect for the environment and its living inhabitants. Two recent and high-profile law-enforcement initiatives have viewed environmental and animal-advocacy groups as threats in the United States. These initiatives are the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) prosecution and Operation Backfire. The former prosecution targeted SHAC—a campaign to close one animal-testing firm—and referred also to the underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF).1 The latter prosecution *. Legal director of Friends of Animals, an international animal-rights organization founded in 1957. †. Lee Hall, who can be reached at [email protected], thanks Lydia Fiedler, the Vermont Law School, and Friends of Animals for making it possible to participate in the 2008 Symposium and prepare this Article for publication. 1. See Indictment at 14–16, United States v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., No. 3:04-cr-00373-AET-2 (D.N.J. May 27, 2004), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ pdffiles/shacind.pdf (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Schedule Chart (8 1/2 X 14 In
    Time Room 1. Room 2. Room 3. Room 4. Moffett Center Moffett Center Moffett Center Moffett Center 9:00 April 10, 2010 SUNY Cortland, Moffett Center Registration Sarat Colling - Elizabeth Green – Ashley Mosgrove 9:30 Introduction Anthony J. Nocella, II Welcoming Andrew Fitz-Gibbon and Mechthild Nagel 10:00 – Academic Facilitator: Jackie Riehle Animals and Facilitator: Ronald Pleban Species Facilitator: Doreen Nieves Social Facilitator: Ashley Mosgrove 11:20 Repression Book Cultural Inclusion Movement Talk (AK Press, 1. The Carceral Society: From the Practices 1 Animal Subjects in 1. The Politics of Inclusion: A Feminist Strategy and 1. DIY Media and the Animal Rights 2010) Prison Tower to the Ivory Tower Anthropological Perspective Space to Critique Speciesism Tactic Analysis Movement: Talk - Action = Nothing Mechthild Nagel and Caroline Alessandro Arrigoni Jenny Grubbs Dylan Powell Kaltefleiter 2. An American Imperial Project: 2. Transcending Species: A Feminist 2. The Influential Activist: Using the 2. Regimes of Normalcy in the The Role of Animal Bodies in the Re-examination of Oppression Science of Persuasion to Open Minds Academy: The Experiences of Smithsonian-Theodore Roosevelt Jeni Haines and Win Campaigns Disabled Faculty African Expedition, 1909-1910. Nick Cooney Liat Ben-Moshe Laura Shields 3. The Reasonableness of Sentimentality 3. The Role of Direct Action in The 3. Adelphi Recovers „The 3. Conservation perspectives: Andrew Fitz-Gibbon Animal Rights Movement Lengthening View International wildlife priorities, Carol Glasser Ali Zaidi individual animals, and wildlife management strategies in Kenya Stella Capoccia 11:30- Species Facilitator: Jackie Riehle Animal Facilitator: Anastasia Yarbrough Animal Facilitator: Brittani Mannix Animal Facilitator: Andrew Fitz-Gibbon 1:00 Relationships Exploitation Exploitation Exploitation and Domination 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Until One Has Loved an Animal, a Part of One's Soul Remains Unawakened
    THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE, USA SPRING 2014 Until one has loved an animal, a part of one’s soul remains unawakened. —ANATOLE FRANCE For the Love of Life Contents Spring 2014 THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE, USA Editor Ananya S. Rajan 2 From the President’s Desk Designer Lindsay Freeman By Nancy Secrest OfficErs anD BOarD Of DirEctOrs 4 The Reason Why By RAdha Burnier President Nancy Secrest secretary Ananya S. Rajan 5 An Inside Look at Animals treasurer Betty Bland An Interview with Robyn Finseth Board Members Tim Boyd By Nancy Secrest Kathy Gann Jon Knebel Jeanne Proulx 9 To Ziggy with Love Honorary By AnanyA S. Rajan Board Members Joseph Gullo Miles Standish 12 Meet the Girls Contact information for the Theosophical By AnanyA S. Rajan Order of Service in the United States: Mailing address Theosophical Order 14 On Service Animals of Service 1926 N. Main St By Nancy Secrest Wheaton, IL 60187 send donations by 19 Do Animals Have Rights? check to: P.O. Box 1080 By Morry Secrest Wakefield, NC 27588 Phone 630-668-1571 ext. 332 22 Beagle Freedom Project E-mail [email protected] By Kathy Gann Website www.theoservice.org To leave a name for the Healing network: 23 Happy Birthday Jane 800-838-2197. For animal healing contact us at 25 Where the Wild Things Are [email protected] By AnanyA S. Rajan For more information about the TOS around the world, go to http://international. theoservice.org/ 28 Scholarship Recipients Disclaimer On the cOvEr: Articles and material in this publication do not necessarily Friends for Lifetimes--Bella with Tarra roam the grounds at reflect the opinions of the Theosophical Order of Service or The Elephant Sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Nokill
    Approaching No­Kill: Challenges and Solutions for the Los Angeles Animal Services Department Caroline Nasella April 28, 2006 UEP Comps 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Chapter I: The Players and Politics Behind the LAAS Controversy 9 Chapter II: Methods 20 Chapter III: Animal Shelters and the Companion­Pet Surplus 26 Chapter IV: The Animal Welfare and Liberation Philosophy 39 Chapter V: What is possible: The San Francisco SPCA And Animal Care and Control Facilities 47 Chapter VI: A Policy Analysis of the Los Angeles Animal Services Department 69 Chapter VII: Recommendations 80 Conclusion 86 Bibliography 89 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper is an examination of the Los Angeles Animal Services (LAAS) Department. It looks at the historical, political and philosophical context of the Department. It examines the validity of grievances made by local animal welfare groups against the Department and analyzes the LAAS Department structure and policies. Using a comparative case­study, it identifies the San Francisco animal care facilities as effective models for LAAS. Through an exploration of such themes, this report makes pragmatic policy recommendations for the Department with the goal of lowering shelter euthanasia rates. 3 INTRODUCTION 4 When asked about why activists have targeted LAAS in recent years, cofounder of Animal Defense League – Los Angeles (ADL­LA) Jerry Vlasik argued that the group wanted to focus on one municipal shelter whose reformed policies could translate “throughout the nation”. He believes that if the city goes “no­kill” it will serve as a model for all cities. Vlasik contends that LAAS is not worse than other municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Animal Law 2005.01.Pdf
    VOL. I 2005 JOURNAL OF ANIMAL LAW Michigan State University College of Law J O U R N A L O F A N I M A L L A W VOL. I 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION The Gathering Momentum…………………………………………………………………. 1 David Favre ARTICLES & ESSAYS Non-Economic Damages: Where does it get us and how do we get there? ……………….. 7 Sonia Waisman A new movement in tort law seeks to provide money damages to persons losing a companion animal. These non-compensatory damages are highly controversial, and spark a debate as to whether such awards are the best thing for the animals—or for the lawyers. Would a change in the property status of companion animals better solve this important and emotional legal question? Invented Cages: The Plight of Wild Animals in Captivity ………………………………... 23 Anuj Shah & Alyce Miller The rate of private possession of wild animals in the United States has escalated in recent years. Laws at the federal, state, and local levels remain woefully inadequate to the task of addressing the treatment and welfare of the animals themselves and many animals “slip through the cracks,” resulting in abuse, neglect, and often death. This article explores numerous facets of problems inherent in the private possession of exotic animals. The Recent Development of Portugese Law in the Field of Animal Rights ………………. 61 Professor Fernando Arajúo Portugal has had a long and bloody tradition of violence against animals, not the least of which includes Spanish-style bullfighting that has shown itself to be quite resistant to legal, cultural, and social reforms that would respect the right of animals to be free from suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • I Mmmmmmmm I I Mmmmmmmmm I M I M I Mmmmmmmmmm 5A Gross Rents
    OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation I or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation À¾µ¼ Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury I Internal Revenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2018 or tax year beginning 02/01 , 2018, and ending 01/31 , 20 19 Name of foundation A Employer identification number SALESFORCE.COM FOUNDATION 94-3347800 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) 50 FREMONT ST 300 (866) 924-0450 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption applicatmionm ism m m m m m I pending, check here SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 m m I G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, checkm hem rem anmd am ttamchm m m I Address change Name change computation H Check type of organization: X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminamtedI Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here I Fair market value of all assets at J Accounting method: Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month terminmatIion end of year (from Part II, col.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf
    DISSERTATION PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION Submitted by Corey Lee Wrenn Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Michael Carolan Lynn Hempel Michael Lacy Marcela Velasco Copyright by Corey Lee Wrenn 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION This project explores the intra-movement interactions between professionalized and radical factions in the social movement arena using a content analysis of movement literature produced by the Nonhuman Animal rights movement between 1980 and 2013. Professionalized factions with greater symbolic capital are positioned to monopolize claimsmaking, disempower competing factions, and replicate their privilege and legitimacy. Radical factions, argued to be important variables in a movement’s health, are thus marginalized, potentially to the detriment of movement success and the constituency for whom they advocate. Specifically, this study explores the role of professionalization in manipulating the tactics and goals of social movement organizations and how the impacts of professionalization may be aggravating factional boundaries. Boundary maintenance may prevent critical discourse within the movement, and it may also provoke the “mining” of radical claimsmaking for symbols that have begun to resonate within the movement and the public. Analysis demonstrates a number of important consequences to professionalization that appear to influence the direction of factional disputes, and ultimately, the shape of the movement. Results indicate some degree of factional fluidity, but professionalization does appear to be a dominant force on movement trajectories by concentrating power in the social change space.
    [Show full text]
  • Cause and Effect. the Controversial Credo of a Militant Animal Rights' Activist
    [- Cause and Effect. The controversial credo of a militant animal rights' activist. DR. JERRY VLASAK : Would I advocate taking five guilty vivisectors' lives to save hundreds of millions of innocent animal lives] CBC News and Current Affairs Tue 19 Apr 2005 Time: 22:00 EDT Network: CBC Television PETER MANSBRIDGE (HOST) : - Cause and Effect. The controversial credo of a militant animal rights' activist. DR. JERRY VLASAK : Would I advocate taking five guilty vivisectors' lives to save hundreds of millions of innocent animal lives? Yes, I would. - PETER MANSBRIDGE (HOST) : Canada's seal hunt is under fire once again from animal rights groups, including the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, a group with a reputation for extreme tactics. Now some disturbing words are coming from one of its senior members. While he's been actively defending the lives of animals, he's been talking about taking the lives of people. Peter Gullage reports. PETER GULLAGE (REPORTER) : Early April on the ice off the Magdalen Islands at the front line of the fight against the seal hunt. To American Dr. Jerry Vlasak, a leading member of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, it's a brutal slaughter of innocents. He also crusades against animal testing for medical research. In the past, he advocated the murder of researchers involved in animal testing. DR. JERRY VLASAK : Would I advocate taking five guilty vivisectors' lives to save hundreds of millions of innocent animal lives? Yes, I would. PETER GULLAGE (REPORTER) : But Paul Watson, founder of the Sea Shepherd Society, claims his organization is non-violent and Vlasak's words were taken out of context..
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Sociological Naïveté in the Animal Rights Movement
    Theory in Action, Vol. 9, No. 1, January (© 2016) DOI:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.16003 Overcoming Sociological Naïveté in the Animal Rights Movement Joseph H. Michalski* The following paper draws upon Milner’s theory of social status to explain why nonhuman animals generally are not accorded equal status or the same level of compassion as human beings. The inexpansible nature of status means that one’s position in a status hierarchy depends upon how one fares relative to everyone else. Acquiring status requires the ability to excel in terms of collective expectations, or the ability to conform appropriately to extant group norms. Moreover, social associations with high-status individuals usually further enhance one’s relative status. Animals are disadvantaged along each of these aspects of status systems in most cases. Moreover, their relational and cultural distance from human beings reinforces their inferior position, reducing the likelihood of human beings defining them as “innocent victims” or otherwise according them full and equal rights. Yet animal rights activists who are aware of these sociological realities will be in a better position to advocate more effectively on behalf of at least selected nonhuman species. [Article copies available for a fee from The Transformative Studies Institute. E-mail address: [email protected] Website: http://www.transformativestudies.org ©2016 by The Transformative Studies Institute. All rights reserved.] KEYWORDS: Animal Rights, Sociological Theory, Status, Nonhuman Species, Activism. * Joseph H. Michalski, Ph.D., is Associate Professor and Chair, Department of Sociology, King’s University College at Western in Ontario, Canada. His academic work focuses mainly on the development and application of sociological theory to explain variations in diverse forms of human behaviors, but especially with respect to different forms of violence.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Choctaw: a Cultural Awakening' Book Launch Held Over 18 Years Old?
    Durant Appreciation Cultural trash dinner for meetings in clean up James Frazier Amarillo and Albuquerque Page 5 Page 6 Page 20 BISKINIK CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED PRESORT STD P.O. Box 1210 AUTO Durant OK 74702 U.S. POSTAGE PAID CHOCTAW NATION BISKINIKThe Official Publication of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma May 2013 Issue Tribal Council meets in regular April session Choctaw Days The Choctaw Nation Tribal Council met in regular session on April 13 at Tvshka Homma. Council members voted to: • Approve Tribal Transporta- returning to tion Program Agreement with U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs • Approve application for Transitional Housing Assis- tance Smithsonian • Approve application for the By LISA REED Agenda Support for Expectant and Par- Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 10:30 a.m. enting Teens, Women, Fathers Princesses – The Lord’s Prayer in sign language and their Families Choctaw Days is returning to the Smithsonian’s Choctaw Social Dancing • Approve application for the National Museum of the American Indian in Flutist Presley Byington Washington, D.C., for its third straight year. The Historian Olin Williams – Stickball Social and Economic Develop- Dr. Ian Thompson – History of Choctaw Food ment Strategies Grant event, scheduled for June 21-22, will provide a 1 p.m. • Approve funds and budget Choctaw Nation cultural experience for thou- Princesses – Four Directions Ceremony for assets for Independence sands of visitors. Choctaw Social Dancing “We find Choctaw Days to be just as rewarding Flutist Presley Byington Grant Program (CAB2) Soloist Brad Joe • Approve business lease for us as the people who come to the museum say Storyteller Tim Tingle G09-1778 with Vangard Wire- it is for them,” said Chief Gregory E.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal-Industrial Complex‟ – a Concept & Method for Critical Animal Studies? Richard Twine
    ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 EDITORAL BOARD Dr. Richard J White Chief Editor [email protected] Dr. Nicole Pallotta Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Lindgren Johnson Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Laura Shields Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Susan Thomas Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Richard Twine Book Review Editor [email protected] Vasile Stanescu Book Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Carol Glasser Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Adam Weitzenfeld Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Matthew Cole Web Manager [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD For a complete list of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board please see the Journal for Critical Animal Studies website: http://journal.hamline.edu/index.php/jcas/index 1 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 (ISSN1948-352X) JCAS Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 EDITORAL BOARD ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]