By Aaron Korenewsky Submitted to Central European University

CEU eTD Collection

R EPRESENTATION OFTHE EPRESENTATION F ACING THE ACING In partial Supervisor E NEMY fulfillment of the requirements forfulfillment ofthe thedegree of

N : Nationalism Studies ProgramNationalism Studies AZI Central European University

A s : András Kovács N E A Aaron Korenewsky Budapest, Hungary NEMY IN IN NEMY NALYSIS OF NALYSIS Master ofArts Submitted to Submitted S TALINGRAD 2015 By

YODOR YODOR

and MarshaSiefert NLINE NLINE

ONDARCHUK D

ISCOURSE

’ O S 2013 VER THE THE VER

W AR F ILM ILM CEU eTD Collection inthe to andinstilled whetheror mythology nationaland Great the of memory meta These meta major three between online identifies thesis published this so, reviews doing In 2013. November film and September of corpus a of analysis thematic a the conducting why explain to attempting in figure by Nazi gap the of this representation fill to attempts thesis The Union. former the Soviet of area the overlooked largely has media world in Nazism of representations understanding developedand other inHollywood Wes similar Though Nazism. of glorification a as others by and face” a with particularly controversy, blockbuster domestic grossing highest its and production A bstract Fyodor Bondarchuk’s 2013 Bondarchuk’s Fyodor - hms ugs cran oitl nite with anxieties societal certain suggest themes s

f h Scn Wrd a, rcn sur recent a War, World Second the of - themes relied upon by Russian Russian by upon relied themes youngest

aroi Wr including War, Patriotic over

its Nazi character Peter Kahn Peter character Nazi its generation

not the memory of the war can be successfully transferred successfully becan war the memoryof the not Stalingrad Stalingrad tern cinema nearly 50 years represent nearlyand cinema ago shiftingtern 50 .

was both the Russian Federation’ Russian the both was worry over foreign interference in Russia’s Russia’s in interference foreign over worry

film critics in discussing in critics film gener ate te iie dsore t did it discourse divided the d . e n ieaue n present on literature in ge Stalingrad labeled h present the a memory war, in which which in war, memory a

by some as “an enemy “an as some by

was also steeped in in steeped also was depictions - day Stalingrad artv and narrative s first IMAX first s

of Nazis of ’s Nazi. ’s - day day by CEU eTD Collection Chapter 4:Methodology Chapter on 3:Background Chapter Post 2:Soviet and Chapter Memory 1:Memoryand Events War Introduction TransliterationNote Russian on Tab Abstract Table of C IdentifyingBody Data the FilmCritics Reviews and Film Reception Studies Stalingrad StateRussian Support Film Revisitedinthe2000s War The Post Brezhnev’s War Cult NarrativeStalinist Memory War MemoryEvent Collective Memory le of Contents le of

Production

...... - Soviet Period: Soviet Redux? Period: Soviet Soviet ’s Nazi Figure: Peter Kahn

......

...... ontent

......

...... -

...... Stalingrad ...... Soviet War Narratives Cult

...... s

......

...... ii

......

...... 42 41 37 37 34 30 28 28 25 23 20 17 17 15 13 10 10

ii 1

CEU eTD Collection B: Appendix A: Appendix Bibliography Conclusion Chapter 5:Analysis Critics’ Discussionof Peter Kahn Stalingrad Codes andIdentified Themes Thematic Analysis A NewMyth Loving the Invader: orTraitor? Victim Our HistoryOscar? foran

......

as “Game

Table of MegaCritic.ru Reviews Table of KinoPoisk AggregatedTable of KinoPoisk Reviews ......

......

...... - Changer”

......

...... iii

......

84 76 68 64 62 57 53 51 49 48 48 45

CEU eTD Collection citations language Russian in transliterated rendered thus is name director’s The Bondarchuk.” English in published consistently UR webpage was script that unless system, BGN/PCGN the using script Latin transliterated into Note on Russian All Russian language titles, phrases and names names and phrases titles, language Russian All L.

The only exception made to this is the name of the film’s director, which is which director, film’s the of name the is this to made exception only The Transliteration - agae rs ad cdmc scholars academic and press language according to BGN/PCGN standards as “F as standards BGN/PCGN to according iv

“Fyodor” in the in “Fyodor”

eeecd n hs thesis this in referenced thesis title and body, and title hip as “Fyodor “Fyodor as hip a part a ë dor

of a of and are .” .”

CEU eTD Collection (FOM 3 http://fom.ru/Proshloe/10430 ( OpinionFoundation (Public two over shows Surveydata War: A Note,” Patriotic Great the in Deaths “CountingSoviet ANote,” War: Patriotic Great the Deaths in wildly. vary scholarship Russian and Western in estimates 2 212. 198, 2011): Press, CambridgeUniversity Gill, J. Graeme period: theduring Brezhnev an Militarism Patriotism, (NewYork Post Union and Soviet the in Narratives (2007): Memories,” II Historical War Films and World Recent Russia: 2 no. (2008) 44, Lithuania,” and in Russia,Ukraine War World Second ofthe Memories 2008): Routledge, NY: Studies European East and Russian on Routledge Series ed, 1st Rulyova, Natalia and Hutchings, in Nationhood,” Russian Vi War World ofthe Second Coverage Television Present: 2009): Routledge, Russia, Digest &Memory 2012): Press, Patriotism and Memory, Movies, Russia: New the in History Blockbuster War,” 1 actively ce to plan they that acknowledging fewer slightly with them, to important is Nazis, the over 9 May the Day, Victorythat express 98%) to 95% during victimized were or in participated who relatives had or have families Russian of majority a that ensured has died and fought who relatively was it when period Yeltsin myth. Soviet former its reclaimed has which War, Patriotic Introduction

Pamyat’ o Velikoy Otechestvennoy o Velikoy Pamyat’ However, million 26.6 inat 1993. stood Sciences Academyof the Russian givenby official estimate The World the Second at LookBack Russia and Screen: Ukraine theon Silver Wars “Memory SerhyYekelchyk, , May 6, 2011), 2011), May6, , , no. 72 ( 72 no. , Australian and New and Australian 1 ” in in ”

183 Certainly, the war and its mythology were never completely forgotten, even duringeventhemythology forgotten, completely its never andwere warCertainly, the o vn hs rae sgiiac i contemp in significance greater has event No

, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007): Macmillan, Palgrave NY: , 22, no. 1 (2010): 144; Ivo Mijnssen, “The Victory Myth and Russia’s Identity,” Identity,” Russia’s and Myth Victory “The Mijnssen, Ivo 144; (2010): 1 no. 22, Russian Nationalism and the National Reassertion of Russia of Reassertion National the and Nationalism Russian - 185; Thomas Sherlock, “Destroying a Settled Past, Creating an Uncertain Futur Uncertain an Creating Past, Settled a “Destroying Sherlock, Thomas185; lebrate the day. lebrate the

136 2010): 6 2010): :

173 -

141; Gregory Carleton, “Victory in Death: Annihilation Narra Annihilation in Death: “Victory Gregory Carleton, 141; 218 – http://fom.ru/Proshloe/44 84; Stephen M. Norris, “G StephenNorris, 84; M. –

137 71; Stephen Hutchings and Natalia Rulyova, “Commemorating the Past/performing the the Past/performing the “Commemorating Rulyova, Natalia Stephenand 71; Hutchings – — d the Russian National Idea,” Idea,” National Russian the d 9; Valerie Sperling, “M ValerieSperling, 9; The Post The

Zealand Journal of European Studies European Journal of Zealand - the most recognized war dead estimate stands at nearly 26.6 million 26.6 nearly at stands estimate dead war recognized most the - 138; Stefan Rohdewald, “Post Rohdewald, Stefan 138; thirds of Russians had family that died in the war. Narodnyy prazdn war.Narodnyy in the died that family had ofRussians thirds . Public Opinion Foundation (hereinafter “ (hereinafter OpinionFoundation Public

h war. the

- Soviet Russian Media: Conflicting Signals Conflicting Media: Russian Soviet

(FOM - 2 Soviet Russia: Destroying a Settled Past, Creating an Uncertain Future Uncertain Creating an Past, a Settled Destroying Russia: Soviet

n Rsin sil vrhligy cnitnl around (consistently overwhelmingly still Russians And , May , 2013) 8, Europe Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics Soviet in Legitimacy and Symbols

162

de ; Sperling, “Making the Public Patriotic,” 237 Patriotic,” Public “Makingthe ; Sperling, aking the Public Patriotic: Militarism and Anti Militarismand Patriotic: Public the aking uiding Stars: The Comet The Stars: uiding - - 163; Valerie Sperling, “The Last Refuge of a Scoundrel: Scoundrel: ofa Refuge Last “The ValerieSperling, 163; emphasized. The sheer number of Soviet citizens citizens Soviet of number sheer The emphasized. - Asia Studies Asia Nations Nations 1

, -

ctory Celebrations and the (de)construction of the (de)construction and Celebrations ctory See Soviet Remembrance of the Holocaust and National and Holocaust ofthe Remembrance Soviet http://fom.ru/Proshloe/10913 th

: Michael Ellman and Maksudov S, “Soviet S, Maksudov and Ellman : Michael Europe state holiday commemorating the victory the commemoratingholiday state Studies in Russian and Soviet and Cinema Russian in Studies and Nationalism and

5, no. 2 2 no. (2013) 5, 46, no. 4 (1994): 671 no. (1994): 4 46, rr Ptns Rsi ta te Great the than Russia Putinist orary - era status as foundational societal societal foundational as status era - Asia Studies Asia FOM , ed. Marlène Larue ed.Marlène , Forum for Modern Language Studies Language Modern for Forum

- (Bloomington: (Bloomington: like Rise of the War Film in War Putin’s the Rise of like ” ), May 2, 2012), 2012), May2, ), C. Stephen Beumers, ed. Birgit ,

: tives in Russia Today,” Today,” Russia in tives 9, no. 2 (2003): Status(2003): 241. 2 no. 9,

5; Stephen M. Norris, Norris, StephenM. 5;

55, no. 2 (2003): 303 no. (2003): 2 55, –

(Cambridge; New York: York: New (Cambridge; 80; Michael Haynes, Haynes, 80; Michael ; Indiana University University Indiana Odna na vsekh pobeda vsekh na Odna lle (New York: (Newlle York: Analytical Russian e,” in e,” - 239. 239. - Militarism in Militarism ik (New Yor (New Historical Historical

9 maya 9

1, no. 2 2 no. 1, History – 9. 9. k,

—

CEU eTD Collection 2012). Press, University Indiana 6 5 Win,” http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124277297306236553 HistoryCommission,” 4 e might and support and funding state Post to past glorious the of visions different very own their advocated energeticallyBondarchuk, Fyodor and Mikhalkov, Russia New has Norris Stephen history. blockbuster scholar deemed film that concept a again, proud Russians make to symbols seek actively were elite cultural Russia’s profits. windfall just than more something represent films these But potential. office box Russian defined better bigger, many then, Since Ledbedev’s Nikolai film, War Patriotic Great first its released industry film Russian The state. the of project or domain sole the simply not victory. a of out root establishment to commission the level presidential even and 2020; through 2001 from funded programs Education Patriotic the of part as events themed War Patriotic Great of funding the Lesson’; ‘Memory re the Square; Red on parade Day Victory the to narrative, war renewed a promoting re the by to exemplified efforts and resources significant devoted has Un party his and Putin Vladimir of guidance the under efforts building nation Russian contemporary of centerpiece the into developed has War Patriotic

Stephen M. Norris, Norris, StephenM. Comet “GuidingStars: The Norris, 177 Wood, Time But the reimaging or re or reimaging the But Great the that sentiment popular consistently this given surprise no be then should It 4

, accessed April 19, 2015, 2015, April 19, accessed , - 178; Sperling, “Making the Publi Sperling,“Makingthe 178; a ubr f ao Rsin im director film Russian major of number a , Blockbuster History in the New Russia: Movies, Memory, and Patriotism and Memory, Movies, Russia: New the in History Blockbuster Wall Street Journal Wall Street - introduction of military hardware in 2008 that delivered further pomp further delivered that 2008 in hardware military of introduction

- 6 Soviet audiences. While these directors often times do receive receive do times often directors these While audiences. Soviet

As Norris makes clear in his book his in clear makes Norris As - like Rise of the War Film in Putin’s Russia,” 164. Russia,” inFilm Putin’s the War Rise of like - http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1896927,00.html purposing of the Great Patriotic War in present in War Patriotic Great the of purposing - uddwr im aebe rlae,svrl fwih re which of several released, been have films war funded , May 21, 2009, sec. Business, sec. 2009, May , 21, c Patriotic,” 230 Patriotic,” c ven be members of United Russia, Norris emphasizes Norris Russia, United of members be ven n cek rtcs o te oit a efr and effort war Soviet the of criticism check and : John Wendle, “ : Wendle, John 2

Star i 20 atr nearly a after 2002 in , - - 240; Andrew Osborn, “Medvedev Creates Creates “Medvedev AndrewOsborn, 240; i siuin f oit rdtos ie the like traditions Soviet of nstitution s, such as Nikolai Ledbedev, Nikita Nikita Ledbedev, Nikolai as such s, Russia Moves to Ban Criticism of WWII ofWWII Criticism Ban to Moves Russia ing to produce new heroes and and heroes new produce to ing ited Russia. The Russian state state Russian The Russia. ited Blockbuster History in the in History Blockbuster

(Bloomington: (Bloomington: - - day Russia is Russia day er hiatus. year .

- 5

CEU eTD Collection 615 2011): Culture,” Russian Contemporary in Triumphalism of Dynamics and Right: War Post 357 Period,” Recent Cultureofthe thePopular 10 9 & Culture Society Media, 8 7 meta war mid the in released films war of number a in enemy Nazi the of representation the that written meta and motif Soviet traditional had shift dramatic one least at However, Post the differentiates little that be largely 1940s. ‘Stalinist’ or ‘Soviet’ more were 2000s the in released films the of many that declared scholars Some screens? cinema Soviet on depicted was that directors th have financing. and prestige further them gain will believe they largely be to least at diverse either setin conceptionsofRussianness crafting production funding and introducing state Russian the actuality all state no been has there and power patriotic one less is government, and directors between link the that

Id in Post Builder as Nation Film “Inverting FilmPolicy: Gorp, Jasmijn Van 1. Norris,

Carleton, “Victory in Death,” 147 Death,” in “Victory Carleton, ., ., 254. - - 358; Gregory Carleton states inlate a states GregoryCarleton 358; - Soviet Russian culture, but that it is necessary to move beyond it. movebeyond to necessary is it but that culture, Russian Soviet 2000s radically deviates f deviates radically 2000s 10 But is the war being fought in Post in fought being war the is But Blockbuster History in History Blockbuster

- Russia’s many recent historical and war themed blockbusters, which express quite express which blockbusters, themed war and historical recent many Russia’s Though the communist ideology has been stripped away, the perception appeared to appeared perception the away, stripped been has ideology communist the Though - themed war films were being conceived of and produced before Putin came to to came Putin before produced and of conceived being were films war themed

- 617. 617. narrative, since they establish the Nazi as a tragic figure, caught between forces out forces between caught figure, tragica as Nazi the establish they since narrative,

f patriot of

erefore based on their own their on based

ic 33, no. 2 (2011): 252 (2011): 2 no. 33, -

tld films styled chosen chosen

the New Russia the nme of number a

- 148; Mark Lipovetsky, “Post Mark Lipovetsky, 148; rom the clichéd, stereotyped ultra stereotyped clichéd, the rom the Great War as Patriotic thesettin has

r article that this Neo this that article r - decree on the ideological content of Post of content ideological the on decree The Slavic and East European Journal East and European The Slavic narrative element. . Stephen Norris, among others, has has others, among Norris, Stephen . element. narrative perpetually . 8

usa filmmakers Russian - , 307 , 254. personal tastes and patriotic visions, visions, patriotic and tastes personal opeey nucsfl ntaie t increase to initiatives unsuccessful completely

- 309. 309. Soviet Russian multiplexes today the same war war same the today multiplexes Russian Soviet en dniid wih opeey emgd a reimaged completely which identified, been - 3 oit ieai dsore rm oit one. Soviet from discourse cinematic Soviet

Russia’s imperial Russia’s been

- Soviet paradigm has dominated scholarship on scholarship dominated has Sovietparadigm

lyn catch playing - Sots: Transformations of Socialist Realism in in Realism Socialist of Sots: Transformations

than what had been released in the the in released been had what than See ae rl tkn h iiitv in initiative the taken truly have 9 -

Gregory Carleton, “History Done “History Carleton, Gregory ie ta my e believed be may than sided ueos i name big Numerous - - Soviet Russia, 1991 Russia, Soviet villains found in the Soviet Soviet the in found villains or Soviet past. appear This or Soviet Slav g of their nationalg their ideal. of -

48, no. 3 (Autumn 2004): no. (Autumn 3 2004): 48, p n h cnm front, cinema the on up ic Reviewic - Soviet film. Soviet as well as what as well as

70, no. 3 (Fall (Fall 3 no. 70, - 2005,” 2005,”

Russian 7

— In

CEU eTD Collection Screen on Slime Visib “Darkness Friedman, Lester D. 2000 through 1940 Portrayals, Miniseries Mitchell, Charles P. 2010); Praeger, eds., 1945 since Politics and Cinema History, Kar 2012); Group, Publishing International eds., Bridges, Elizabeth Lugt, and Vander T. Kristin Magilow, DanielH. 2012); Press, Wisconsin University of The Wis: Hake, Sabine 2013); Press, Rau, Petra ofEmotion,” the and Politics Väter 14 13 228 2006), Kansas, 12 118 2008), Press, University (Bloomington: Indiana Torlone M. Zara and Norris Stephen M. ed. Su Films Memories,” II Historical War and 11 miniseries 2009 Tarantino’s 2004 Hirschbiegel’s Quentin of release the by motivated Germany. and Hollywood of out coming miniseries and films towards oriented primarily cinema, world in Nazism of depictions of phenomenon the Nazis scholars these of work the pick should thatothers and suggests tohuman being, existent,’ 2005 of conclusion the in film Soviet/Russian in por been has Nazism how in shift major a as sees she what describing brieflyfurther by conventions. and sentiments Soviet older to counter runs films Russian Y Denise control his of

Laurel Cohen Laurel Id Youngblood, DeniseJ. Comet Stars: The “Guiding Norris, StephenM. lkin, “Identifying the Enemy in Contemporary Russian Film,” in Film,” Russian Contemporary in the Enemy “Identifying lkin, ., ., 232 Monsters in the Mirror: Representations of Nazism in Post Nazismin of Representations Mirror: the in Monsters . She claims that the Nazi has evolved from the obviously evil, to the idiotic, tothe‘non idiotic, evil, tothe obviouslyfromevolved the Nazi has the . She claims that have thePost been in studied On the other hand, there has been a recent and rapid surge in schola in surge rapid and recent a been has there hand, other the On - 233. 233. Our Nazis: Representations of Fascism in Contemporary Literature and Film and Literature Contemporary in Fascism of Nazis:Representations Our oungblood also proposes that the depiction of the German enemy in several recent recent several in enemy German the of depiction the that proposes also oungblood nee ütr usr Väter unsere Mütter, Unsere Nazisploitation! The Nazi Image in Low in Nazi Image The Nazisploitation!

- , ed. Murray Pomerance (Albany: State University of New York Press, Albany, 2004), 255 Albany, 2004), Press, York ofNew University State ed.(Albany: Murray , Pomerance Pfister, “Claiming the Second World War and Its Lost Generation: Unsere Mütter, Unsere Unsere Mütter, Unsere LostIts and War Generation: World “ClaimingSecond the Pfister, — - ht hs hss il al h “od Nazi.” “good the call will thesis this what 230. 230.

Russian War Films: On the Cin the War On Films: Russian e Untergang Der Screen Nazis: Cinema, History, and Democracy, Wisconsin Studies Film Democracy, and History, Nazis:Cinema, Screen

appear Seminar: A Journal of Ge of Journal A Seminar:

The Hitler Filmography: Worldwide Feature Film and Television Television and Film Feature Worldwide Filmography: Hitler The le: Images of Nazis in American Film,” in Film,” American in ofNazis Images le:

Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema Soviet and Russian in Studies (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012); Sara Buttsworth and Maartje Abbenhuis, Abbenhuis, Maartje Sara Buttsworthand 2012); Macmillan, (Palgrave s - (Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., 2009); 2009); Inc., Company, & McFarland Carolina: North (Jefferson, olin Machtans and Martin A. Ruehl, MartinA. and olinMachtans

Soviet RussianSoviet cultural space. o e the be to [ Downfall -

like Rise of the War Film in Putin’s Russia: Recent World Recent World Russia: Film Putin’s in the War of Rise like [ u Mtes Or Fathers Our Mothers, Our Russian War Films: On the Cinema Front, 1914 Front, Cinema the On Films: War Russian - Brow Cinema and Culture and Cinema Brow 4 total

ema Front, 1914 Front, ema , n te 03 emn ulc television public German 2013 the and ], rmanic Studies rmanic xet o hc sc representations such which to extent - War Popular Culture WarPopular Insiders and Outsiders in Russian Cinema Russian in Outsiders and Insiders 14

Much of this has been seemingly been has this of Much 11 - 2005 Inglourious up on this phenomenon. onthis up

ikn u o Nri’ work, Norris’ on up Picking 50, no. 1 (February 2014): 104 no. (February 2014): 1 50,

1, no. 2 (2007): 163 2 no. (2007): 1,

Bad: Infamy, Darkness, Evil and and Evil Darkness, Infamy, Bad:

Hitler Hitler (Lawrence: University Press of Press University (Lawrence:

(New York, NY: Continuum Continuum NY: (New York,

]. These pieces have have pieces These ]. - (

Santa Barbara, CA: Barbara, Santa Films from Germany: Germany: Filmsfrom

(Edinburgh University University (Edinburgh 12 Basterds,

h ge a step a goes She rly attention on attention rly - 120. – 89; Oleg 89;

(Ma

13 Oliver dison, dison, trayed –

Yet, – 71. 23; 23; , of of

- - CEU eTD Collection 258 Screen on Slime and Evil in Film,” American inNazis of Images Visible: “Darkness Friedman, 51; Lester D. 45, 39 2012), Group, Publishing International Continuum NY: (NewYork, Bridges Lugt, Vander Elizabeth and T. in Nazis,” 31 2012), (N Bridges Lugt, Elizabeth Vander and T. Kristin in Heritage,” 17 2010. paper, unpublished Undead,” Nazi ofthe CulturalSignificance The Gas Mask”: the in Freak “The Kingsepp, 108, quotingEva 2012), Group, Publishing International Continuum York: (New Bridges Elizabeth Lugt,and Low in Nazi Image The Nazisploitation! 16 12 1993), Press, University Indiana 15 War World Second the of memories and subjects taboo once only not exploring in foil useful a as audi modern by upon gender ofmasculinity,rolessuch asand and definitions changing are reflected being indulged anxieties, modern which through prisms become therefore West the in enemy Nazi the of progres of name the in purpose, on us to do might society own our what for fear of expression an as well as […] society our and ourselves of side dark the reflecting ‘us’, are Nazis the that feeling uncanny the in ‘rooted is the fantasize s scholarship Recent Nazism. of sexuality and power and perceived explore to audience and directors authors, among eagerness revealing post official the of subversion and challenging the reflected media. Western in Holocaust the and Nazism on discourse” “new a of development the of evidence were audiences, and critics from had they disgust of kind the that 1984 generating in as 1970s, and 1960s late early the in novels and film as in found Nazis of representations claimed Friedländer Saul Russia. in is it argue Youngblood officersrole even ofprotagonists, inthe and tragic victim. heroes, placin by retrospective and squeamish both audiences contemporary made

See Marcus Stiglegger, “Cinema beyond Good and Evil? Nazi Exploitation in the Cinema of the 1970s and Its and ofthe 1970s Cinema the in Exploitation Nazi Evil? and Good beyond “Cinema Stiglegger, Marcus See in Cinema,” Exploitation Beyond ‘Nazi Science’ Value? Social Redeeming “Utterlywithout Ward, J. James Saul Friedländer, - 259. —

ee u by ay etr hn h Nazis? the than better any boys our were

But it is also evident that this is not a new phenomenon in the West, as Norris and Norris as West, the in phenomenon new a not is this that evident also is it But - 32; Michael D. Richardson, “Sexual Deviance and the Naked Body in Cinematic Representations of Representations Cinematic in Body the Naked and “SexualDeviance Richardson, D. Michael 32; Nazisploitation! The Nazi Image in Low in Nazi Image The Nazisploitation! Nazisploitation! The Nazi Image in Low in Nazi Image The Nazisploitation! Reflections of Nazism: An Essay on Kitsch and Death and Kitsch on Essay An Nazism: of Reflections , ed. ,ed. Mur ences and directors. and ences

ray Pomerance (Albany: State University of New York Press, Albany, 2004), Albany, 2004), Press, York New of University State (Albany: rayPomerance -

17, 20 17, - Brow Cinema and Culture and Cinema Brow - s.” 21. 21. 16

The shift in imagery and the subsequent re subsequent the and imagery in shift The ew York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group, Group, Publishing International Continuum NY: York, ew 17 - Brow Cinema and Culture and Cinema Brow

Thus, the Nazi figure in the West now functions now West the in figure Nazi the Thus, - Brow Cinema and Culture and Cinema Brow 5

— hl as ptnily ucinn a a as functioning potentially also while , ed. Danie ed. , , tra , till argues so: “This obsession “This so: argues till - ns. Weyr Thomas (Bloomington: ns. (Bloomington: Weyr Thomas a nraie i te West, the in narratives war , ed. Daniel H. Magilow DanielH. ed. , l H. Magilow, Kristin T. Vander Vander T. Kristin Magilow, l H.

, ed. Daniel H. Magilow, Magilow, DanielH. ed. , 15 Bad: Infamy, Darkness, Darkness, Infamy, Bad:

T g Nazi soldiers and soldiers Nazi g i nw discourse new his - , Kristin Kristin , imaging

the -

CEU eTD Collection 20 19 18 Warbin World memory Secondof the And sincecollective the Federation. Russian the in place taking now is West the in ago decades Friedl identified scholars that Holocaust and war the remembering of discourse’ that suggests it then convention, Soviet of subversion recent Post relatively the in Nazis’ ‘good of inclusion recent the that true, be Post of claims the if And Union. former Soviet and Bloc Eastern the in Nazism of representations cinematic explain to unable or unlikely is exists currently framework conceptual or theory little what that suggests also it country, combatant represent first, any in attempt todoso. language, to the is book her that claim to as far so goes she audiences; Western among generate images We the in Nazis’ ‘screen of categorization or description Western those from different fundamentally democracies she studies. is Nazism with experience Russian the Post and Soviet subtitled to access proper lacked she because Nazis’ ‘screen of representations Democracy and History, Cinema, Nazis: Hak Sabine with case the is as consideration, from excluded specifically the last veteransand passed survivors Holocaust have imaginations public’s the in engrained remain likely will that images very the are B the in found stand

Id Id Hake ., ., 4. 27. ., 9, - Soviet films. Soviet - in , 27. 27. ,

hs l mas ht o ol i te eet lry f coasi o cinematic on scholarship of flurry recent the is only not that means all This is or literature this in unmentioned completely goes either case Russian the Yet or proxy for discussing contemporary social issues. Already, the imagery of Nazism Nazism of imagery the Already, issues. social contemporary discussing for proxy or tos f aim lot opeey eod f n nesadn o a major a of understanding an of devoid completely almost Nazism of ations

- movies of the 1970s, and often censored, has entered the mainstream. These These mainstream. the entered has censored, often and 1970s, the of movies 18

But Hake’s larger reason for excluding the Ru the excluding for reason larger Hake’s But 19

Hake’s book appears to be the only text that hasgoneHake’s theonlybeyond text appears tobe mere book

20 . Hake claims she omits an analysis of Russian Russian of analysis an omits she claims Hake .

— a fast prospect that is approaching. - Soviet film scholars are assumed to assumed are scholars film Soviet t y nlzn te fet such affect the analyzing by st ds the nation Russian together, - Soviet war narrative are a a are narrative war Soviet ä ssian case is theoretical is case ssian dr n ohr Western other and nder

the same kind of ‘new ‘new of kind same the e’s book book e’s long after long Screen

—

CEU eTD Collection оскар# бондарчука 2015, 18, ‘Oskar,'” Na Zayavku Otozvat’ Rubezhom, Za Fil’ma Etogo Zapretit’Prokat RF; 22 g vvyydet 2012 http ved 21 andindividuals, was referenced even in status. entry Oscar its of it strip to and website the on launched even Minis was the at directed Change.org, petition a Eventually Nazism. was glorify which to Kahn, Peter declared character Nazi Bondarchuk’s slamming some with film, the of wel as reviews Film controversy. in embroiled was film the success, critical moderate as well as financial, overwhelming its 86 the at Film Language Foreign Best for entry Russia’s became 70 the with coincide to USD). released million and 30 produced (roughly rubles billion 1.2 of budget standards Russian rubles billion 1.67 of take a with office box Russian d grossing highest the theatergoers, million 6.2 nearly blockbuster 2013 Bondarchuk’s Fyodor re b namely, so does It today. Russia in shape taking motif Nazi’ ‘good the on been acceptedorrejecteduncovered. id bediscourse new surrounding this therefore is sets mind and points reference cultural Itthe that located, be discourse new this probe. that imperative and assess to critical more the all are evolution and divergence its

Petr Morozov, “Ministerstvo K “Ministerstvo Morozov, Petr “ - ufcd el fe te ulcto o Nri’ ril i agal is ot ii fr in form vivid most its arguably in article Norris’ of publication the after well surfaced Stalingrad ë :// t s VTB peregovory o finansirovanii ‘Stalingrada finansirovanii peregovory o t sVTB ria share . Given this seemingly monumental gap, this thesis aims to re to aims thesis this gap, monumental seemingly this Given ru www / culture - . на ,” ,”

. - KinoPoisk change ,” ,” территории RIA Novosti RIA /20110516/375267863. . org , / n p - . /министерство d рф

, ., accessed

- accessed April 20, 2015, April 20, accessed запретить ul’tury RF: Zapretit’ Prokat Fil’ma ‘Stalingrad’ F. Bondarchuka Na Territorii Territorii Na Bondarchuka F. ‘Stalingrad’ Fil’ma Zapretit’Prokat ul’turyRF:

l as online commentary acknowledged the divided reception divided the acknowledged commentary online as l

try of Culture, seeking to ban the sale of the film in Russia Russia in film the of sale the ban to seeking Culture, of try April html - entified, and how widely and why this new discourse hasdiscourse new this whywidely andhow andentified, - прокат культуры

; “ ; 20, 2015, 2015, 20, critics’ reviews and the generalreviewscritics’ and the press Stalingrad Ekranizatsiya romana ‘Dukhless’ c politicheskim politicheskim c ‘Dukhless’ romana Ekranizatsiya 22 - этого

ht eiin a eetal sge b 34,799 by signed eventually was petition That ,’” - 7 рф RIA Novosti RIA

http

http - - фильма запретить t h ://

. This film remains, with a viewership of viewership a with remains, film This . :// niesr o te ate te im also film the battle, the of anniversary ria www . ru — - omestic picture in the history of the the of history the in picture omestic за / culture , . el vr t euly nros by enormous equally its over well kinopoisk - - accessed рубежом прокат /20111209/511291318. th -

фильма

. April 20 ru - Academy Awards. Despite Despite Awards. Academy отозвать Change.org - / focus scholarly attention attention scholarly focus film /468196/ - сталинград , 2015, , 2015, - заявку ecause this motif motif this ecause . , accessed April accessed ,

; “ 21 - Bondarchuk Bondarchuk на podtekstom podtekstom

html Seemingly - ф - - .

CEU eTD Collection of corpus the analyzes then thesis the place in methodologythis WithNazi. its and film the surroundingdiscourse in critics’ film cultural the identifying for source on potential a as film the of reviews focus to decides and methodology reception film overviews then thesis K Thomas actor German by played Hauptmann debate the Kahn, Peter the on: focuses that character the and provides backing, then state its thesis production, The film’s the Nazi. on complex background and human more a showing in period Soviet ‘Post a and villains, Nazi and heroes Russian between line dividing clear a with past Soviet ‘simple’ narrat the presenting to turns thesis the then and discussed, first are clash’’ ‘memory and event’ ‘memory of concepts The study. reception a conducts thesis this was, it as framed was Nazi to the evolvingof the narrative war. aspect new seemingly a to acceptance, or resistance, and displeasure their express to and frame public the for site the become had Nazi’ and ‘good The praising enemy. Nazi some the of with representation vision, that of reception their in divided apparently were critics film and audiences Russian But support. state significant received elite cultural renowned and successful most Russia’s contemporary of one by film His war. the of vision Bondarchuk’s over occurring was clash a such case, specific this In memories. des in figure Nazi the argue, will thesis this As discourse? Bondarchuk’s in figure Nazi the rbd s ‘eoy ls’ r ‘eoy a, a ofit ewe cmeig group competing between conflict a war,’ ‘memory a or clash’ ‘memory a as cribed ives of the war apparent from the literature on the Russian war cult war Russian the on literature the from apparent war the of ives - o xlr th explore To therefore thesis This Soviet’ memory of the war that disrupts and subverts the motifs and motifs the subverts and disrupts that war the of memory Soviet’

and that film’s Nazi represent a kind of institutional memory being p being memory institutional of kind a represent Nazi film’s that and is memory clash and to understand why the debate over over debate the why understand to and clash memory is Stalingrad aims to answer the following question: why did the portrayal of of portrayal the did why question: following the answer to aims Stalingrad

film reviews available, a available, reviews film

create such a divided and often times irate public irate times often and divided a such create 8

Stalingrad nd showcases the various themes various the showcases nd

became the site of what is what of site the became lens or meta or lens

others rejecting his his rejecting others — one grounded in a in grounded one retschmann. The The retschmann.

— symbols of the of symbols a project that project a - themes Stalingrad resented

used used ’s

CEU eTD Collection foundationalcontemporary myth society. Russian of apar intrinsically is that one space, cultural Russian the in shape taking motif controversial a of understanding scholarly to contribute war the of narrative the with anxieties societal underlying review these in utilized s in discussing the Nazi figure Nazi the discussing in s

o te eeoig Post developing the of t 9

— themes t themes I dig o te hss will thesis the so, doing In . hat also - oit a cult war Soviet suggest a number of number a suggest — the CEU eTD Collection Collecti Memory: 25 Theory and History 24 down: taken been since website has project’s 2007 through funded waswhich project, the to Cambridgecontributed of the and University Bergen 23 studies. memory collective for basis the forms and memory collective of past their reshaping and shaping memory collective War.particular Patriotic memory,a ofthe image, particular Great the of segment a least at how addressing term this understanding an provide to effort an makes still it However, debate. enormous that of minutiae the in down bogged getting sciences. social the in phenomenon elusive most the perhaps pursuing slopes, of slipperiest the on embarking are students its that memory collective of Memory Collective of representation ‘true’ or ‘real’ the historical Great events, the like Patrio over clashes of foci the are they because interest Bondarc Fyodor War at Memory multi a of part as widely but elusive Chapter 1

Motti Neiger, Oren Meyers, and Eyal Zandberg, “On Media Memory: Editors’ Introduction,” in Introduction,” Memory: Editors’ “OnMedia Zandberg, Eyal and Meyers, Oren Neiger, Motti WulfKanste Helsinki University of Tartu, of University ofGroningen, University from the Researchers arc Hlwcs wr i agal te trig on fr n dsuso of discussion any for point starting the arguably is work Halbwachs’ Maurice study the behind challenges methodological the discussing in posits Kansteiner Wulf an itself memory, collective on literature the of sliver a only addresses chapter This iner, “Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies,” MemoryStudies,” Collective Critiqueof AMethodological Memory: in “FindingMeaning iner, ve Memory in a New Media Age New Media a in Memory ve .

23 41, no. 2 (May 2002): 180. 180. no. (May 2 2002): 41, huk’s huk’s : MemoryEvents and Memory War

- — The first of these concepts is the so the is concepts these of first The - p debated nvriy olbrtv poet n eoy n h post the in memory on project collaborative university his basic argument that groups construct groups that argument basic his Stalingrad

henomenon, so as to introduce two key concepts both developed both concepts key two introduce to as so henomenon,

together

represents for this thesis. Such events are of scholarly scholarly of are events Such thesis. this for represents tic War http://www.memoryatwar.org/

, ed. Motti Neiger, Oren Meyers, and Eyal Zandberg (New Zandberg Eyal and Meyers, Oren Neiger, ed.Motti ,

is the conceptual glue that binds many researchers researchers many binds that glue conceptual the is

usa pbi i itraiig n ciiiig a criticizing and internalizing is public Russian collective memory collective — 10 which representwhich so

- called “memory event,” which is what is which event,” “memory called , since at its heart, this thesis is thesis this heart, its at since , their own images of reality by reality of images own their . 24

hs hss s o amd at aimed not is thesis This

- labe led, “memory wars.” led, 25 , University of University , of -

oit region, Soviet eiiin of Definitions

On Media Media On

- 2013. The 2013.

CEU eTD Collection 7. 2003), Press, Retrospection National 30 29 History in Studies Histories: 28 U Europe Postwar in Memory 27 26 Society Theorizing Remembering, in Remembering,” A.“Theorizing Misztal, Barbara 2011); Macmillan, Palgrave York: makersor mistakenly, are, deliberately misunder past. the with playing for reasons complex or devious have do and can public the of members that fact the overlooks it since incomplete, as approach popular protest political of site the become not does narrative grandevery populace the among popular be still can elite the by cultivated myths societal dominant that fact the ignoring for and unified too as memory popular treating as resistance, political counter of concept Foucault’s on based largely is which school, popular earlier the criticized have approach dynamic the of Scholars memory. of production popular the memoryc that ‘dynamic fact the for provided the and elite, the and from away onus the approach’ of some shifted has ‘popular approach,’ the dubbed scholarship, recent more However, constructio top a for only provided memory collective of theories outdated. which work, his beyond move to quick are they Halbwachs, to cite or to tribute pay memory collective of scholars However, mostindividual. while an of those from past, understandingthe or of representation share the stress therefore memory collective

niversity Press, 2006), 4. 4. 2006), Press, niversity Kansteiner, 181; Misztal, 54. 54. Misztal, 181; Kansteiner, Jeffrey K. Olick, “Introduction,” in “Introduction,” JeffreyOlick, K. 71. Misztal, in the and Past,” Public The ofResidence’: “‘Charms Wright, Patrick and Michael Bommes 61 Misztal, A major point of divergence in the literature is over who produces memory. Early Early memory. produces who over is literature the in divergence of point major A 26 an and is generatedbelow. fromis and an

, ih lts adn dw gad artvs o e osmd y h public. the by consumed be to narratives grand down handing elites with n, - 62, 70 62,

- 71; Richard Ned Lebow, “The Memory of Politics in Postwar Europe,” in Europe,” inPostwar ofPolitics Lebow,Memory “The Ned Richard 71; , ed. Jeffrey K. Olick, Politics, History, & Culture (Durham [N.C.]: Duke University University Duke [N.C.]: Culture(Durham & History, Politics, ed.Jeffrey Olick, , K.

, ed. Richard Ned Lebow, Wulf Kansteiner, and Claudio Fogu (Durham: Duke Duke (Durham: Fogu Claudio and Kansteiner, Lebow, Wulf Ned Richard ed. , - Writing and Politics and Writing

is described and perceived as incomplete, rigid, and severely severely and rigid, incomplete, as perceived and described is

(Maidenhead, England: Open University P University Open England: (Maidenhead, States of Memory: Continuities, Conflicts, and Transformations in in Transformations and Conflicts, Continuities, Memory: of States , ed. Richard Johnson et al. (Routledge, 2013), 255. 255. 2013), Johnson Richard (Routledge, al. et ed. , 27

Yet, these approaches disagree over the details ofdetails the over approachesdisagreethese Yet, d, societal aspect of this layer of memory, of a a of memory, of layer this of aspect societal d, 11

stood.

30 -

down process of collective memory collective of process down

ress, 2003), 51. 2003), ress, . 28 29

Other scholars regard the regard scholars Other And sometimes memory sometimes And Theories of Social Social of Theories

Making Making The Politics of of Politics The - memor

y and y —

CEU eTD Collection Age Memories Digital 36 35 34 33 32 31 online. devised and conceived as memory collective is level basic most its at which memory,’ ‘digital on focus and term the and form and world their to relate people that way the changed conceptually has technology, cellular and media digital of the ubiquity with along connectivity, Internet decades. two last the of development technological actions they thenew within take societalcircumstances. the explain to and groups these for need the legitimate to come also narratives Those crisis. own the provide their which narratives, promote to opportunity their see actors other legitimacy, political or social its losing and crumbling is memory national dominant a where circumstances, such In Europe. a collapse, ideological or societal of times bottom. the at actors between or bottom actors various between dialectic a involves of state a in always but unitary, never is here Memory identity. over negotiation of process a as memory to attuned more is approach dynamic the resources. for claims ce advancing of service the in goals, political of service the in completed is production memory of process the approach, popular the For production. memory of aim

Rutten, “Why Digital,” 219 “WhyDigital,” Rutten, 221; Digital,” “Why Rutten, 183; Kansteiner, 73. Misztal, Olick,7. 71. Misztal, 62. Misztal, 6; Lebow,4,

(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007). Press, University Stanford (Stanford: This focus on memory from below has only has below from memory on focus This approaches recent more two these between divide other the to leads This

(Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009 Macmillan, Palgrave (Basingstoke: 31

Though not denying that memory can be generated for political goals, political for generated be can memory that denying not Though

220; JoanneGarde 220;

social and historical continuity needed during and after such a a such after and during needed continuity historical and social 36

But this literature on collective memory and the digital the and memory collective on literature this But

Hansen, Andrew Hoskins, and Anna Reading, eds., Annaeds., Reading, and AndrewHoskins, Hansen, consume memory.consume 34

drn te olpe f omns i Eastern in communism of collapse the during s uh ilcis eoe l te oe nes in intense more the all become dialectics Such — 12 oeta bten cos t h tp n the and top the at actors between potential

); Jose Van Dijck, VanDijck, Jose );

been animated and emboldened by the by emboldened and animated been

contest. 35

This has even led to the rise of rise the to led even has This Mediated Memories in the Digital Digital the in Memories Mediated 33

hrfr, hs approach this Therefore, ti itrss or interests rtain — what is the is what Save As... As... Save era 32

CEU eTD Collection 42 41 40 7. 2013), Macmillan, Palgrave (New York: Fedor Julie and Etkind, Alexander UilleamBlacker, 39 Social 2010), 20, October Networking http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press 38 222. “Why Rutten, Digital,” 7; 2013), Macmillan, (New Palgrave York: Fedor Julie and Etkind, Alexander Uilleam ed. Blacker, Europe, in Eastern Theory and in Memory “Introduction,” Etkind, New Media, Central and European Eurasian Russian, 37 an have can events memory of kinds these that means simultaneously. means and devices of kind or number any from more, gradually are memory’ were they as steel or stone in than are memorialization and art modern that given day, of concept Nora’s that memory.” of ‘site a of Pierreideaconceptmodifies Nora’s this meaning.” cultural accepted its with rupture a creates that of one War Western supposed this counteract to and Memory Event populations globally. active media social most the of one as ranked consistently is Russia that fact the despite is This overlooked. completely was recently quite until which sphere online the on particularly communi of ashes the of out identities new build to try to publics and regimes both by post the that claim scholars sameThese criticized been has

Blacker Blacker Id. Id Etkind, “Introducti Alexander and UilleamBlacker

Russia Has World RussiaHas ofMemory,” Language the and Diasporas Digital Wars: “Web EllenRutten, ., 6. Alexander Etkind, Alexander ., 6.

team - Networking Memory at War at Memory In order to update scholarl update to order In and Etkind, 6. 6. Etkind, and - Audience developed the the developed - http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press Audience ’s Most Engaged Social Media Audience (ComScore, July 2, 2009), 2009), July 2, (ComScore, Audience Media Social ’s Engaged Most ;

as too Western centric, particularly by scholars of the post the of scholars by particularly centric, Western too as Russia Has World’s Most Engaged Social Media Audience Worldwide (ComScore, (ComScore, AudienceWorldwide Media Social Engaged Most Has World’s Russia

“ ’s ’s ‘ Mapping Memory Mapping

sites of memory of sites -

Worldwide novel concept of “memory event. “memory of concept novel lead researchers Alexander Etkind, is the, “re the, is Etkind, Alexander researchers lead

but not always, physically intangible, they are they intangible, physically always, not but - . y conception of memory to the realities of the digital age digital the of realities the to memory of conception y Releases/2009/7/Russia with

,” -

Soviet space has seen a rampant and ubiquitous drive ubiquitous and rampant a space seen Soviet has Nora’s sites. Nora’s ’ Eastern European Memory Studies Memory European Eastern

- is simply too static and permanent for the present the for permanent and static too simply is eti udrtnig f eoy the memory, of understanding centric on,” in in on,” no. 4 (2010): 172; Uilleam Blacker and Alexander Alexander and UilleamBlacker 172; 4 no. (2010): 13

- Memory and Theory in Eastern Europe Eastern in Theory and Memory Releases/2010/10/Russia more often more 42 -

has Not only do only Not

‘explosive’ impact on everyday life everyday on impact ‘explosive’ - World 40 ” 39

Etkind continues by stating that stating by continues Etkind

A memory event, according to according event, memory A 41 being generated electronically generated being -

s The stress here is on theon stressThe hereis f - Most Digital es this mean that mean this es oevr ti hs also has this Moreover, ,

- October 2010, 4. October2010, Engaged - - Has

discovery of the past the of discovery Icons: Studies in in Studies Icons: - Most - - also Soviet space. Soviet Social

- Engaged eoy at Memory , ed. , accessible accessible -

‘sites of ‘sites - sm, act 37 -

CEU eTD Collection 46 New Media Communism,” after Cultures Convergent 45 44 Macmill (New Palgrave Fedor York: in MemoryWars,” 43 media the in event the of representation the to or event the of impact the to itself event emphasis the that argues Fredheim Instead, eyes. our before flash memory collective affected has it that mean or piece particular a commemoration. study to wants who author an of dictates the fit to stretched be can given flexible, too as event’ ‘memory term the operationalizing as definition Etkind’s default. by event memory a product a such make argue, would Fredheim premieres. mediums, cultural of host whole cultural eliteat have been times the onlinesphere. certainly active in arm and enthusiasts p by initiated being as perceived increasingly are events memory of kinds over than rather distributed, archives. or and museums monuments, as such sites commemorative traditional produced rapidly are that multimedia and discourse an films, memoirs, over occurring seemingly are Russia in past the over debates occurringgeneration. inmemory sought team War at Memory the then, are them to react to means since figures, or events historical remembering of ways and

Rolf Fredheim, “Detecting Memory Events,” Events,” Memory “Detecting RolfFredheim, Russian and NinthCompany The Games: “Patriot Norris, StephenM. 4; Etkind, 6; Etkind, and Blacker 6. Etkind, and Blacker Etkind,5; Europe’s Eastern Overlook Not Studies Should Memory “WhyDigital Rutten, Ellen 5; Etkind, and Blacker eoy events Memory to shift This , no. 8 (2012): 68. 68. (2012): 8 no. , 45

But the very fact that a film exists or has been distributed should not, as Rolf as not, should distributed been has or exists film a that fact very the But Memory and Theory in Eastern Europe in Theory and Memory 46

Simply because content is generated, or an event held, does not, however, not, does held, event an or generated, is content because Simply - ‘ chair historians in Russia, rather than the state, though the political and political the though state, the than rather Russia, in historians chair memory event memory ae en nesod y the by understood been have

more readily accessible readily more

an, 2013), 227. 2013), an,

Digital ’ including

seems all the more necessary given that the most intense most the that given necessary more the all seems to reflect on the spatial and temporal changes that are are that changes temporal and spatial the on reflect to Eastern European Memory Studies Memory European Eastern

Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Europea Central and Eurasian Russian, in Studies Icons:

— 14 for the aims of this thesis thesis this of aims the for indeed some seeming me seeming some indeed

, ed. Uilleam Blacker, Alexander Etkind, and Julie Etkind,Julie and Alexander Uilleam , Blacker, ed.

and available. By changing sites to event to sites changing By available. and eoy t War at Memory both the event (site) and the the and (site) event the both has to be shifted from the the from shifted be to has 44 , May 2013, 9 May , 2013,

em as team mory events simply events mory Fredheim criticizes Fredheim as 43

Likewise, theseLikewise, im ad film and films rivate persons, persons, rivate - 10. 10. incl

online d uding a a uding

that it that n CEU eTD Collection 50 http://www.filmquarterly.org/2009/12/talking revisionism http://www.villagevoice.com/2009 Fun,” Revisionism Makes Holocaust Basterds http://www.newsweek.com/tarantino 49 48 47 defining or out staking In identity. of issues over potentially or claims, resource or political it. upon the competingclash memories of before at hinted studies memory collective Memory War social taste. c taboos or issues social of discussion generate that conventions cultural or genre some subvert or atta But awards. like buzz critical by and websites, film on reviews user of number the results, office box the ‘game as considered crash. plane Smolensk 2010 the after frenzy media the or 2011 in Lviv in parade Day Victory the like forums, on comments user or traffic web substantial created that events’ ‘memory those on largely been had team Wars “game as relevant” perceived are push they memories the not or whether by power their receive only they which in events, memory of discussions first the in Etkind discourse ritical success, that was perceived to be bending the rules of Holocaust remembrance and remembrance Holocaust of rules the bending be to perceived was that success, ritical

Lebow, Holocaust,” Rewritesthe “Tarantino DanielMendelsohn, Etkind,5. Id ., 10. ., 10. Memory at Wars at Memory — rdems rtcs teeoe re therefore criticism Fredheim’s

50 13 o eape Qetn Taratino’s Quentin example, for — — - fun/

- uh clashes Such 15. 15. hte te e mmr generates memory new the whether 49 e t nie r offline. or online it be

; Be

ched to this consumption is also whether the content of these films reinforce films these of content the whether also is consumption this to ched n Walters, “Debating Inglourious Basterds,” Basterds,” “DebatingInglourious nWalters,

changing’ or ‘identity relevant’ in terms of the number of theatergoers, theatergoers, of number the of terms in relevant’ ‘identity or changing’ team, though they do put the rather memorable label of ‘memory war’ ‘memory of label memorable rather the put do they though team,

ersn te staking the represent - . The concept of memories competing or clashing is not novel to to clashing novel concept competingisnot or ofmemories . The 08

- rewrites - 18/film/quentin 47

hs ol appear would This - -

point The Village Voice Village The holocaust But memory events also include films, which can be can which films, include also events memory But - - — orients this thesis to another major concept of of concept major another to thesis this orients Basterds debating - 15 that memory eve memory that tarantino - 79003

u o vros positions various of out Newsweek discourse. - inglorious wih a bt a ao fnnil and financial major a both was which , ; J. Hoberman, “Quentin Taratino’s Inglourious Inglourious “QuentinTaratino’s Hoberman, ; J. - , August 18, 2009, August , 18, s Film Quarterly Film - inglourious

o i wt te net xrse by expressed intent the with fit to , August 13, 2009, 2009, 13, August , - bastards/ 48

nts are the focus points for points focus the are nts h fcs f h Mmr at Memory the of focus The - basterds , (2009), (2009), , .

- hnig o “identity or changing” - makes — potentially over over potentially - holocaust - the CEU eTD Collection 52 9. 1995), (Winter After and 1989” Before Europe Eastern Histories: Identifying 51 “goodN Russian how for analyzed be can then will that film the surrounding discourse chapterthe of segment a identifying for The methodology a establish literature. the in obvious quite made limitations methodological and studies reception film of discussion brief a entails first which chapter, following the of subject the is This enemy? the of representation that against or for are ‘combatants’ various the why understand to order in analyzed, be Nazi it and film Bondarchuk’s over clash memory the can how becomes, then Bondarchuk’s includes certainly which events, memory various over debate and discourse the over forming andiscourse analysis particularme ofthe surrounding wider the contested, being is memory specific a why discover to order In memory. competing of becomes then the to opposition ones memory because memory because remember. to wants group another what “remembering otherwise.” called, Rev Istvan what forgotten, or accentuated either are details various memories, new

Misztal, 123 Misztal, “Introduction,” Starn, Randolph and Rev, Istvan StephenGreenblatt, h my yblcly ersn a at vn o trauma or event past a represent symbolically may who hs ieaue eiw a teeoe hw ta cletv mmr i Ru in memory collective that shown therefore has review literature This this But azi.” narratives - 124. 124.

Stalingrad by no means a smooth or easy process. What one actor wishes actor one What process. easy or smooth a means no by

commercialization or banalization or commercialization provide s suc o hsoia tuh ht rvds bss o scea identities; societal for basis a provides that truth historical of source a is nltcl interest analytical

n hw hs cahs eut n hne t a parti a to changes in result clashes these how and

, Russia’s foremost Great Patriotic War blockbuster. The question The blockbuster. War Patriotic Great foremost Russia’s , s 51

certain societal roles to those able to claim that they are the only only the are they that claim to able those to roles societal certain

critics and web users are reacting to its depiction of the the of depiction its to reacting are users web and critics

r te agr hms r frames or themes larger the are And the reasons to remember or forget may vary may forget or remember to reasons the And 16

t vle o eoy tde, s el s the as well as studies, memory to value its

of a particular image of the past the of image particular a of Representations mory event. mory event. ;

n/ r eas tee i there because or and/

used

49, “Special Issue: “SpecialIssue: 49, would then would s depiction of the the of depiction s

o construct to cular society’s society’s cular

to forget, is forget, to .

52 require sa is ssia

What the the — s CEU eTD Collection Russia Warin WorldII of Cult the of Nina Tumarkin, 2001); Press, PrincetonUniversity N.J: (Princeton, 54 237 221, 173 “Performing Memory,” Wood, 212; 198, 2011), Press, 53 pr German no that at times suggest to as far so went campaign hate this discourse, its of severity the in fluctuated intent. their in subtle means no by are campaign, propaganda this of examples Il aggressor. or Nazi Him” the “Kill poem against Simonov’s people Soviet the uniting at aimed campaign Stalinist Narrative for points reference likely most potential filmcritics the are materials these since films, these into factored enemy Nazi the how and film on cult the towards oriented is but generally, developed cult documented. well been has authorities Putin. and Brezhnev both under myth societal foundational the as warnarrative the label to as far goneso have scholars Post and Soviet of pillar War major a Patriotic as Great functioned the that denying no is there reasons, political for downplayed been po framing of discussions reference potential (2) and today Russia in formation memory collective Post to contributing materials of kinds the (1) into insight provide and contextualize Narratives Chapter 2: Soviet and Post

Amir Weiner, AmirWeiner, Gill, J. Graeme - The outbreak of war in 1941 led to the rapid establishment of a of establishment rapid the to led 1941 in war of outbreak The meta conflicting highlights chapter This 240. 240.

Making Sense of War: The Second World War and the Fate of the Fate and War World Second War: of The Sense Making Symbols and and Legitimacy Symbols

in their discussions of in their discussions Stalingrad

snr wud e ae aie ta te a o etriain being extermination of war the that alive, taken be would isoners 53

And the cult of the Great Patriotic War as developed by Soviet by developed as War Patriotic Great the of cult the And

(New York: Basic Books, 1994). 1994). Books, (New Basic York:

and the Nazi figure. Though the cult of the war has at has times war cultand ofthe theNaziThough the figure.

in Soviet Politics Soviet in y Eebr’ atce Kl, aog h ms cited most the among “Kill,” article Erenburg’s ’ya 54

The discussion below therefore outlines how the war the how outlines therefore below discussion The Stalingrad 17 - -

narratives of the Great Patriotic War so as to as so War Patriotic Great the of narratives Soviet War Cult - 174; Sperling, “Making the Public Patriotic,” 219 Patriotic,” the Public Sperling,“Making 174;

- (Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Cambridge (Cambridge ;York: New oit mytho Soviet .

The Living & the Dead: The Rise and Fall Fall and Rise The &Dead: the Living The

oy n identity and logy

theRevolution Bolshevik n official n ns sd in used ints

propaganda Konstantin Konstantin — hl it While Western -

Soviet - CEU eTD Collection FilmImag 60 ofHarvar Press Belknap Mass: (Cambridge, 59 58 169 1995), Press, University Indiana Film,”on in War The White: “Black 843; Kenez, Peter 2001), (June 3 no. 106, Review Historical American War,” The Patriotic Great Youngblood, Cinema 57 113. 1992), Press, University Cambridge [England]: (Cambridge 7 Paperbacks 56 189. in Victory!,”for 55 als phenomenon post in featured still were soldiers Nazi war. the on rhetoric cinematic the in divergence of kind “Naz the and citizens German post and sloganeering discourse? Soviet dominated Nazis brutish and liability political a as authorities Soviet by perceived was Germans ‘good’ any of absence the asset, violence women and against children. and (1944), as such time, this at genre the of representative present murderous.and acknowledged aevil, savagewartime caricatured Nazi figure depict thattheseas films feature Of front. trusted. be could Russia, in living Germans Volga those even Germans, no that and them, upon returned be would Nazis the by waged

Beverly Crawford and James Martel, “Representations of Germans and What Germans Represent: American Represent: Germans What and ofGermans “Representations Martel, James and Crawford Beverly Naimark, NormanM. Weiner, Id Stites, Richard Tumarkin, ., ., 113 - a wr im a te nm, u tee ee al were there but enemy, the as films war war , ed. Stephen M. Norris and Zara M. Torlon ZaraM. and Norris Stephen M. ed. ,

This hate campaign was curtailed as victory looked within reach. Rather than beingreach.anthan Rather within victorycurtailedlooked ascampaign hate wasThis — - es and Public Perceptions in the Postwar Era,” in Era,” Postwar in the Perceptions Public es and as described Films monsters. brutish and inhuman, ugly, as enemy Nazi the 116; Peter Kenez, “The Picture of the Enemy in Stalinist Films,” in in Films,” Stalinist in “Theofthe Kenez, Enemy Picture Peter 116; Making Sense of the the War of Sense Making

how could the Sovi the could how 72 feature films made between 1942 and 1945, 48 were war films. war were 48 1945, and 1942 between made films feature 72 The Living &Dead the Living The Russian War Films Russian Zoya The Illustrated History of the Soviet Cinema Soviet the of History Illustrated The Russian Popular Culture: Entertainment and Society since 1900 since Society and Entertainment Culture: Popular Russian 57 o occurring simultaneously in Hollywood film. Hollywood in simultaneously occurring o

Though some of these wartime films mocked or ridiculed Nazis, ridiculed or mocked films wartimethese of some Though

14) socs a rl brai eey h cmis acts commits who enemy barbaric truly a showcase (1944), The Russians in Ge in Russians The - a poaad ta epaie te eaain ewe average between separation the emphasized that propaganda war Culture and Entertainment in in Russia Wartime Entertainment and Culture

, 57, 233; Denise J. Youngblood, “A War Remembered: Soviet Films of the Filmsof Soviet “A Remembered: War Youngblood, DeniseJ. 233; 57, , ets hope to win over the German people if anti if overGermanpeople the win to hope ets , 164 ,

, 73 , i.” - 170; Zorkaia, 182 Zorkaia, 170; 59 - 75; Weiner, 16 75; Weiner, -

165. 165. The immediate post immediate The rmany: A History of the Soviet Zone of Occupation, 1945 Occupation, of Zone Soviet the of History A rmany: d University Press, 1997, 1995), 251 1995), 1997, Press, University d

e (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008), 106; 106; 2008), Press, University (Bloomington:e Indiana 55

18 - 3 189. This vilification also played out on the cinema the on out played also vilification This - She Defends the Motherland Motherland the DefendsShe

165; Neia Markovna Zorkaia, “All for the Front! All thefor Front! “All Zorkaia, Markovna Neia 165; Transatlantic Images and Perceptions: Germany Germany Perceptions: and Images Transatlantic 58

(New York: Hippocrene Books, 1989), 174 1989), Books, (New Hippocrene York:

h ht cmag tu gv wy to way gave thus campaign hate The - o lmss f dcn’ Germans ‘decent’ of glimpses so war Stalinist films therefore present a present therefore films Stalinist war , ed. Richard Stites (Bloomington: Stites (Bloomington: Richard ed. , 60 Insiders and Outsiders in Russian Russian in Outsiders and Insiders

For example, the 1950 film 1950 the example, For - 254. 254. , CambridgeSoviet ,

- Germanimagery (1943), 56

It is widely is It of extreme extreme of thes - 1949 Rainbow e filmse

- and and 175, 175,

— a

CEU eTD Collection 65 P Greenwood 64 597. 2003), 63 sympathetic 62 occasional 61. were 61 there Press University Cambridge York: (New Institute Historical though 1776 since America and brutal,” and “vicious conventionally narrat so the Though in as handily, single war the win less or more to mind strategic superior n but released, T victory. final brought had leadership and policies whose Stalin, and Party the of role the glori from away shifted emphasis The Zhukov. General as such war, the during status and heroic given been demoted had who order those removed short in also he 1947, in workday regular a to holiday national from de Stalin onlydid Not Stalin. by cult war the intervenedIndustry.following behalfheavycriticism fromFilm onits the Ministry ofthe this even released only was Yet film the and time, its Americans. in controversial was portrayal the with ally who Nazis former the to contrast in Army, Red the of soldiers the to sympathetic and friendly are who Germans “decent” featuring further, a humanindividuals. faceless mass, rather than as represented are techniques camera various through who Nazis, of hundreds battling the for Hitler curses child, destruc dead her holding mother, a which in scene one in resulting Berlin of Fall The

his did not mean the end of the war films genre films war the of end the mean not did his Youngblood, Youngblood, Gallagher, MatthewP. as Myth Memory,” and War Patriotic Great “The NinaTumarkin, 110 Films,” Stalinist Enemyin ofthe Picture “The Kenez, Taylor, Richard

ive, on ive, tion he has brought upon the German people. But this same film shows Soviet soldiers Soviet shows film same this But Germanpeople. the upon brought has he tion The curtailing of the hate campaign represents but a piece of a larger drawing down of of drawing aa larger piece campaignrepresentsof down The the but curtailing hate of

ress, 1976), 39 1976), ress, - Russian War Films Russian screen Germans remained as they had in the Stalinist period. Germans remainedGermans period. Stalinist the in had they as remained Germans screen ow Film Propaganda: Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany Russia and Soviet Propaganda: Film - ald huhhv hw e t sm qetoig f hs tlns war Stalinist this of questioning some to led Thaw Khrushchev called

h epai ws on was emphasis the , ed. David E. Barclay and Elisabeth Glaser Elisabeth Barclayand , E. ed. David eit Gra cvlas en sagtrd y hi on government, own their by slaughtered being civilians German depicts The Soviet History of of History Soviet The - 40. 40.

, 95 , - 102; Taylor, 102; fying soldiers and the sacrifice of the Soviet people to people Soviet the of sacrifice the and soldiers fying World War II: Myths, Memories, a Memories, Myths, War WorldII: tln a te ao hr, eitd s sn his using as depicted hero, major the was Stalin Film Propaganda Film - 61 19 mem

The 1949 film The

, 1997). , -

orialize Victory Day by changing its status status its changing byDay Victory orialize 111. 111. though

Schmidt, Publications of the German ofthe German Publications Schmidt, Europ . ,99 , 2nd rev. ed (London: I.B. Tauris, 1998), 1998), Tauris, (London: I.B. ed rev. 2nd , Indeed, w Indeed, - ean Review Review ean 122. 122. Meeting on the Elbe the Meeting on

nd ar films were still being still were films ar

R after Stalin personally Stalin after ealities 11, no. 04 (October (October 04 no. 11, The Fall of Berlin of Fall The

(Westport, Conn: (Westport,

go es evenes 62

. 65 64 63

CEU eTD Collection 167 2002), Basingstoke, Society(Houndmills, Historyand European East and Russian Studies in in Zastoi?,” Ideology of The Socialism: Developed 69 192. 2011), Press, 68 67 Bas (Houndmills, Hutchings in Years,” ofthe Khrushchev 66 summed Union,is Soviet upas followsbyNina Tumarkin: master official the was uninspiringtowhat both unenthusiastic incomparison hadcome and before it. conservativ a as scholarship Western in described commonly socialism,” Stalin. of cult the rebuild Stalinization, de of decade a nearly after not, also could and Revolution, the and Lenin from removed alswas Brezhnev ousted. personally had Brezhnev who Khrushchev, ideologicallyto linked be not would and could Brezhnev foremost, and First authority. Brezhnev’s legitimize par a was cult war the of resurgence The secretaryship. Brezhnev’s Leonid under shape taking ideology Cult War Brezhnev’s on result the largely was This all. at present being not by or individuals blood and flesh than rather airplanes and tanks as screen the from disappearing simply was enemy Nazi the however, Increasingly, film 1961 the in as civilians, German of representations

Id Gill, J. Graeme Youngblood, SovietFilms inthe ofForeigners Representation the Anxiety in and Thaw: Fear “Scant Signof JulianGraffy, the battlefield. ., 202, 211; See the discussion on W on the discussion See 211; ., 202, valiant martyrs ourleadership ofcountry, totheCause, Communist under the FascistBeast wartimeand inhuman its despite practices, thelossof 20million preparedPlans thecountryoverpowering war,andanfor despite att surprise collectivization and[...] rapidunder industrialization Five the first andsecond meta this of core the At battlefield the But - t of a wider search by the Soviet leadership for symbols and myths to shore up and and up shore to myths and symbols for leadership Soviet the by search wider a of t 173. 173. Russian War Films Russian

Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics Soviet in and Legitimacy Symbols

- narrative that took shape in this period, an period, this in shape took that narrative ingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 36. 36. 2008), Macmillan, Palgrave Hampshire: ingstoke, Russia and Its Other(s) on Film: Screening Intercultural Dialogue Intercultural Screening Other(s)ItsFilm: on and Russia

would of these of , 233. 233. ,

narrative stood the Great Patriotic War. The overall plot of plot overall The War. Patriotic Great the stood narrative return estern scholarship during this period in Mark Sandle, “Brezhnev and “Brezhnevand in Sandle, Mark period during this esternscholarship

films films , bigger and louder than ever before, under the official the under before, ever than louder and bigger , 68 placing Brezhnev Reconsidered Brezhnev

nta ti pro ws akd y “developed by marked was period this Instead 20

the emphasis on the on emphasis the

(Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Cambridge (Cambridge ;York: New

d lasted until the collapse of the the of collapse the until lasted d ec t Hm h Enters Who Him to Peace , ed. Edwin Bacon and Mark Sandle, Sandle, Mark and ed.Edwin , Bacon

home front home

Hampshire: Palgrave, Palgrave, Hampshire: e meta e - , ed. Stephen , ed. narrative that narrative , rather than than rather , — 69 ack by presented

- o too far far too o year . 67 66 -

CEU eTD Collection 72 29. 1965 Cult, Personality the and Failureof the War, with. associated or haveinvolved been what litt of inflatethe importance to in or involved never likely was hebattles himselfinto had had Khrushchev and Stalin that renown 1976 71 70 was entertainment. as experienced that productions massive out churning began instead and Thaw. genre films war the of representative like films era Stalinist for preference clear a indicated period Brezhnev early the during filmmakers and Critics behemoths. cinematic true peopleSoviet inthepubli the with resonance popular a found and prominence to returned therefore cult in war The 1965. off, time paid with holiday, national a as Day Victory reinstated and rituals, everyday country the throughout memorials and monuments built regime the as tangible more progressively grandparents. or parents wartime own their through either to, attachment deteriorated health his as up sped that process a medals, and awards 200 over amassed had he life his of end the record service wartime up played partially been have may narrative master this Though

Youngblood, Gill 601. Memory,” as Myth and War Patriotic Great “The Tumarkin,

- great,reverence sowasthat thesacrifice,and sacrifice, for people. ofthe Soviet 1987,” 4; 1987,” Tumarkin, , Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics, Soviet in Legitimacy and Symbols 72 The Brezhnev era war cult also found its voice on film, which led to the production of production the to led which film, on voice its found also cult war era BrezhnevThe from enslavement. Fascist fro Party arose headed Stalin, by Comrade expelled theenemy front as oneand united

with increasing regularity. Moreover, regularity. increasing with The war films genre therefore took a turn away from away turn a took therefore genre films war The m our own territory and thatof savingm ourownterritoryEast and Europe, Europe thus

Russian War Film Russian — h wr ersne a eet ht l Sve ctzn hd some had citizens Soviet all that event an represented war the The Living & Dead Living the The due to Brezhnev’s ego Brezhnev’s to due

c square. 71

s, 144 s, h wr a sil feh eoy ad t lgc became legacy its and memory, fresh a still was war The

n uta the as just And Adrianne Nolan, “‘Shitting Medals’: L.I.Brezhnev, the Great Patriotic Patriotic the Great L.I.Brezhnev, “‘ShittingMedals’: AdrianneNolan, - 70 145. 145.

—

therefore the war cult became a vehicle for Brezhnev to insert insert Brezhnevto for vehicle a became warcult the therefore — , -

193; Lawton, “Toward a New Openness in Soviet Cinema, Cinema, Soviet in Openness Newa Lawton,“Toward 193; 1982” (University of North (Universityof 1982” 132. 132. almost completely disregarded the films of the the of films the disregarded completely almost 21 — Rainbow Brezhnev also lacked the wartime service record and and record service wartime the lacked Brezhnevalso

the state instituted various new traditions and traditions new various instituted state the heroism portrayed and the and portrayed heroism

he had a dispo a had he

evc o eprec, r hog their through or experience, or service

and

treated the war as something to be be to something as war the treated Perso the sition for the theatrical and by and theatrical the for sition

Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2008), 2008), ChapelHill, at Carolina to provide Brezhnev with a with Brezhnev provide to n No. 217 No. n retrospection of the Thaw, the of retrospection — le fighting he may fightinghe le esg f glory of message and the worldand the , declaring them them declaring ,

— CEU eTD Collection 146. 75 74 73 of climax the watch only need One past. the in been had it as enemy Nazi the portraying from deviate not do 1970s and 1960s after or period Soviet late the during depicted was enemy the how of study comprehensive a represent or experimental, such films, 1980s. the and 1970s late the in released was what of some to comparison in loud and “undistinguished,” flat,” “insufferably war’send. hour seven Ozerov’sYury like beingwell the1980s, werereleased into still films epic war audience length however, fatigue, Liberation films. war over comedies or melodramas seeing and before, had audiences representativ also was film this But nations. other all to contrast in message and size its in 25 part

Lawton, “Toward a New Openness in Soviet Cinema, 1976 Cinema, Soviet in Newa Openness “Toward Lawton, Youngblood, Stites, th

anniversary of the end of the war, the film was the epitome of the Brezhnev era war cult war era Brezhnev the of epitome the was film the war, the of end the of anniversary epic epic etr scholar Western perio this in genre the of marker major A Russian Popular Culture Popular Russian rznv Yt ee toe im ta ae rie oe te cnetoa’ im of films ‘conventional’ the over praised are that films those even Yet, Brezhnev. Liberation

was partially inflated by mandatory atten mandatory by inflated partially was

s lm lmvs 1985 Klimov’s Elem as Russian War Films Russian — they were increasingly going to the movie theater less often than they had had they than often less theater movie the to going increasingly were they , with a total run time of nearly 8 hours. Produced to commemorate the the commemorate to Produced hours. 8 nearly of time run total a with , — o Sve fl pit hs fls s hly “conventional,” wholly as films these paint film Soviet of s

the final credits indicate that 20 million Soviets died during the war, the duringdied Soviets million 20 that indicate credits final the , 169 , , 158; Stites, 158; ,

more critical exposé of the war. Unfortunately, there is no no is there Unfortunately, war. the of exposé critical more The Battle for Moscow for Battle The - 170; Youngblood, Youngblood, 170;

Come and See and Come T hese same scholars scholars same hese oe n See and Come Russian Popular Culture Popular Russian 22

RussianWar Films d would undeniably be Yury Ozerov’s Yury be undeniably would d , in which Nazi soldiers burn villager burn soldiers Nazi which in , - 1987,” 20; Youngblood, Youngblood, 20; 1987,” dance for party members. party for dance

released for the 40 the forreleased ae oe aesthetically more are , also argue that s that argue also , 169. 169. , 73 , 142 ,

ned te o ofc for office box the Indeed, e of the fatigue that Soviet Soviet that fatigue the of e - 143, 146. 143, Russian War Films Russian th

ome of these later these of ome anniversary of the anniversaryof

Despite this Despite pleasing or or pleasing — during during s alive alive s , 145 , five - - CEU eTD Collection ( 78 77 kultovyy Smotri,’” 76 of half first the of films war Russian discussing scholars film byWestern about bandied are Realist,” mid to early the pl and aesthetics realist socialist which hadreleased been only a intheaters before month Victory Day. blockbusters, latest the as well as war, the about documentaries melodramas, Stalinist with intermingled Motherland Sky the Chredel’s1969 Vladimir times: multiple aired,sometimes were films Brezhnevera July). in Sunday Day Fatherland the of Defender films war era Soviet television. Victory with coinciding festivals at film contemporary exhibited online; download for and DVD on available widely popular: and accessible films war era Brezhnev and Stalinist one, For on. lives period Soviet the of narrative The Post ofNazisminSovietbrutal history. and horrifyingfilm depictions barns in http://russia.tv/tvp/

The three major networks considered were:( One Channel networks major threeconsidered The Youngblood, was film theworking titleof The - the decade, particularly Nikolai Lebedev’s Nikolai particularly decade, the media, and space cultural Russian the inhabit still films Soviet that fact the Beyond ag years 20 over collapsed Union Soviet the Though

Yr Ozer Yury ; film

REN TV REN and pose with their victims for photographs, to witness arguably one of the most most the of one arguably witness to photographs, for victims their with pose and 77 - ad end yo’ 1977 Bykov’s Leonid and ;

o - A quick review of program schedules for major television networks reveals that reveals networks television major for schedules program of review quick A - Russian War Films Russian Soviet Period: Soviet Redux? Redux? Soviet Period: Soviet voyne includin , accessed May 21, 2015, May21, accessed , ), and the Moscow channel TV Tsentr TV channel Moscow the and ), - 00. hae lk “oe oit” mr Saiit” n “Post and Stalinist,” “more Soviet,” “more like Phrases 2000s.

- On idi ov’s ov’s -

i g a 8 May - fill smotri

Stalingrad

Liberation h arae o ntoa holidays national on airwaves the , 231; Carleto 231; , . Kill Hitler Kill

n My 9 May and ot devices were being reused in Post in reused being were devices ot (February 23), Russia Day (June 12), and Navy Day ( Day Navy and 12), (June Day Russia 23), (February

http://m.ren.tv/novosti/2015 and ; Sergei Bondarchuk’s 1975 1975 Bondarchuk’s Sergei ; . “9 Maya REN ТV Pokazhet Kul’tovyy Fil’m O Voyne ‘Idi I ‘Idi I Voyne O Fil’m Kul’tovyy Pokazhet ТV REN “9Maya . n, “Victory in Death,” 144. 144. Death,” in n,“Victory egy ortkys 2015 Mokritskiy’s Sergey th hr te odes Went Soldiers the There

23 n 04 n 2015 and 2014 in

( http://www.tvc.ru/tvp

http://www.1tv.ru/shed 2002

Day;

Star - and 05 , the first cinematic depiction of depiction cinematic first the , - 07/9

fr instance, for , like 76 eual bodat n state on broadcast regularly , h lnug ad meta and language the o,

- ). ).

maya hy ogt o Their for Fought They

- ), Rossiya 1 1 Rossiya ), itr Dy My 9), (May Day Victory Soviet films, at least in least at films, Soviet

ate o Sevastopol for Battle . 78 - ren

hs fls were films These - tv - pokazhet

h following the Five from Five - Socialist

- the remain remain last - , CEU eTD Collection http://www.rg.ru/2010/05/10/tekst Medvedeva,” D. PF Prezidenta Vystupleniye Svoboda: Voyne,” 66 Posvyaschёnnom Parade, Voyennom Na ystupleniye vMoskve,” Ploshchadi http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/18089 v68 Chest’ Parade “Voyennom Ploshchadi,” Krasnoy PobedyNa Otchizny,” Rubezh 82 81 Post in Power Institutions of Journal 80 in 148. Death,” “Victory Carleton, samebook. the on version based the1949 79 missing went or died had who someone had Russia in family every that state to on went of brunt ha Union Soviet “the the that declared Medvedev President 2010 in terrible: and fascism. Nazi from 2012) 2011, (2010, world whole 20 p the reviewing narrative, or war the to references Nazism, for institution and event sponsored state new every or speech others. to circumstances and pomp greater state Russian the stewardship Putin’s Vladimir under that clear quite it makes scholarship Western narrative. much neededtheSoviet past. reflection on meta Soviet the reproducing evil. and good villains, and heroes between w period, Stalinist the wholesale in was it as war depict films these that view the share years 15 nearly in produced War Patriotic Great the

“My Preklonyaemsya Pered Vsemi, Kto Nasmert’ Stoyal Za Kazhduyu Ulitsu, Kazhdyy Dom, Kazhdyy Kazhdyy Dom, Kazhdyy KazhduyuUlitsu, Za Stoyal Nasmert’ Kto Vsemi, Pered “MyPreklonyaemsya 221, 228 Patriotic,” Public “Makingthe Sperling, Screen,” on Patriotism Russian ‘New’ The Realm: the “Defence of Gillespie, David 361; Lipovetsky, 357 Lipovetsky, 15, it was the sacrifice of the Soviet people that saved Europe (2010, 2014, 2015) or the the or 2015) 2014, (2010, Europe saved that people Soviet the of sacrifice the was it 15, Prezident Rossii Prezident Post just not is it But a the n overview of overview n n h sm trs used terms same the in eyln o Scait els techniques Realist Socialist of recycling fascists - residential address given during the Victory Day parades between 2010 and and 2010 between parades Day Victory the during given address residential 358; Gregory Carleton argues this film is actually more Stalinist in outlook and messagethan and outlook in moreStalinist filmis actually this Gregoryargues Carleton 358; Prezident Rossii Prezident has Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya , , May 9, 2011, 2011, 9, May , wo a trw tre ures f hi fre a Rsi. Medvedev Russia. at forces their of quarters three thrown had who ” re -

adopted numerous Soviet symbols and practices, while also adding also while practices, and symbols Soviet numerous adopted official Victory Day Victory official - Y Godovshchiny Velikoy Pobedy,” Pobedy,” Velikoy Godovshchiny Y Prezident Rossii Prezident - vystuplenia.html - -

, May 9, 2015, 2015, May9, , artv, u atal stunting actually but narrative, Soviet film that maintains Soviet rhetoric and war cult meta cult war and rhetoric Soviet maintains that film Soviet - Soviet Societies Soviet http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/11196

, May 10, 2012, 2012, May , 10, y ia uakn lvs n n fiil discourse. official in on lives Tumarkin, Nina by ; “Rech’ Vladimira Putina Na Voennom Parade Na KrasnoyNa Parade Voennom Na Putina Vladimira ; “Rech’ , May 9, 2014, 2014, May9, , 81 http://kremlin.ru/events/president/tr -

. 245; Wood, “Performing Memory,” 173 “Performing Memory,” Wood, 245;

3 (2005) 3 While this thesis cannot not hope to survey ever survey to hope not cannot thesis this While 24 Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya - commemorations reveal commemorations Y Godovshchine Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy Otechestvennoy v Velikoy Pobedy Godovshchine Y

80 http://www.rg.ru/2012/05/10/putin

n on s, hs fls r nt only not are films these so, doing In . .

79 82 http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20989

—

Mark Lipovetsky Mark And that sacrifice was both immense both was sacrifice that And Prezident Rossii Prezident first and foremost foremost and first

, May 10, 2010, May , 10, ht ay schol many what

, May 9, 2013, 2013, 9, May , anscripts/49438 that the Soviet meta Soviet the that

and David Gillespie David and ; “Pobeda I ; “Pobeda - 179. 179. clear a - rech.html r se as see ars

d taken the taken d t a near a ith ; “Parad ; “Parad The The binary ;

on on

In a ; - - CEU eTD Collection Memory,” 83 officially changed all tocommemorate w example, for who, commenters alongside war the won sacrifice Russia’s claimingthat users ‘nationalist’see to non with interact online. least very the at War, Patriotic Great the of memory” “cosmopolitan a forming are population Russian asp elite cultural and public the in 2000s Revisited War and brutal terrible rather enemy, than a as period: Soviet the in were they as of conceived overwhelming are Nazis, even But speeches. six these Germany from partisans including anti the that declared “deadly” was that force” “dark and a (2013); represented arrogant” bloody, “misanthropic, were plans whose (2012); power” and cynical “terrible a and “aggressive” were that “barbarians” were Nazis (2010); civilization” ideology an was Nazism campaign: hate wartime War.” resulting blows,” cruel most enemy’s the took Union “Soviet the that fact the to 2015 in and victory, for died had that “millions” the 2014to in Nazism,” of country“ourbrunt the to taking 2012 similarreferencesmade in Putin battlefield the

Elena Trubina, “Past Wars in the Russian Blogosphere: On the Emergence of Cosmopolitan Cosmopolitan of Emergence the On Blogosphere: theRussian in “Past Wars Trubina, Elena ects of the war. Elena Trubina of Ural State University State Ural of Trubina Elena war. the of ects Though Soviet era rhetoric remains engrained in engrained remains rhetoric era Soviet Though R

Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media Central and European Eurasian Russian, in Studies Icons: Digital frne t Nazism to eferences be savd o et, r en ild n h con the in killed been or death, to starved been , - 83 Russians than ever before. ever than Russians

This is the result of result the is This - Hitler coalition opposing this dark force had included partisans, partisans, included had force dark this opposing coalition Hitler

has any

also

given

victims ofcircumstance orpolitics. victims n hs sm addresses same these in downplay Stalin’s role or claim that Victory Day should be be should Day Victory that claim or role Stalin’s downplay displayed —

the one and only positive reference to Germans in any of any Germansin to reference positive only and one the that,

ar dead, ar much

t s ut eiet ht emn, specifically Germans, that evident quite is it in the “the decisive battles of the Second World Second the of battles decisive “the the in willingness

On Russian blog Russian On 25 greater access to information and information to access greater

21) Yt i 21, rsdn Ptn also Putin President 2015, in Yet, (2015). and ofthe those Union. notjust Soviet ,

wih etoe te onain of foundations the destroyed “which

and an interest in probing the darker darker the probing in interest an and contemporary

would not be out of place in the the in place of out be not would

has argued has s and forums, it is it forums, and s etain ap. President camps. centration

discourse, the Russian the discourse,

that , no. 4 (2010), 4 no. ,

se gments of the the of gments other Russian Russian other now chances to chances possible

- 76. 76. the the

CEU eTD Collection http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/95322/box 89 88 87 86 85 308. Post in WartimeSubjectivity War: 84 the consumption. domestic than rather circuit, festival international films, the of radical most The praised. quarters some in but controversial, was Nazi new this that suggest does begun in occur take recognized had Friedländer Saul films such in blurred being enemy traditional between Finn. a actually is here ‘Fritz’ the in though too, being human a is enemy 2002 Rogozhkin’s Train contain face.’ human period Soviet the of ‘beasts’ narrative. Post distinctly a forging therefore and war, the of narrative Soviet the subverting be command. high Soviet by taken missteps before: treated been never had that topics with dealt and to alluded that 2000s the in released were miniseries television

“Sbory/ Posledniy Poyezd,” Poyezd,” “Sbory/ Posledniy 170. “GuidingStars,” Norris, Youngblood, 118 Sulkin, 176; “GuidingStars,” Norris, 176. Norris, 298; Baraban, 218 Films, Russian War Youngblood,

film apparently took in a little over 1,000 USD in Russia. in USD 1,000 over little a in took apparently film stands s Norris’ discussion of the reception of these types of films is not very detailed, but it but detailed, very not is films of types these of reception the of discussion Norris’ reflection of kind this But

the first allusions to Soviet mass rape mass Soviet to allusions first the 85

ot udmnal cagd ee s h rpeetto o Germans. of representation the is here changed fundamentally Most 86 Russian War Films Russian u as out

Denise Youngblood, for example, believes that the 2005 miniseries 2005 the that believes example, for Youngblood, Denise h Cuckoo The Russia’s rapidlyRussia’s industry. film developing domestic the h Ls Train Last The

KinoPoisk is Rsin im o vr ae Nz protagonist. Nazi a have ever to film Russian first

. and hero as well as victims and perpetrators, perpetrators, and victims as well as hero and - penal , 223; Norris, “Guiding Stars,” 171; Sulkin, 119. Sulkin,119. 171; “Guiding Stars,” Norris, 223; , S Soviet Russian Films,” Films,” Russian Soviet

are eemingly then the then eemingly

- ly o ti toe f oig o elz ta the that realize to coming of trope this on plays in Western media as early as the late 1960s 1960s late the as early as media Western in . 223; Norris, Norris, 223; , n.d., accessed May 29, 2015, 29, May accessed n.d., , replaced in replaced atlos wrie cannibalism, wartime battalions,

is - 120. 120. o lmtd o h Itre. fuh f a fls and films war of flush A Internet. the to limited not

per t hv be mr oine towar oriented more been have to appears

These films have been argued by film scholars to scholars film by argued been have films These Blockbuster History Blockbuster 26 several of these films films these of several , while ,

Canadian Slavonic Papers Slavonic Canadian kind of kind Aleksey

shift in shift , 115 , 89

Norris is quick to qualify that qualify to quick is Norris

KinoPoisk data indicates that indicates data KinoPoisk German Jr.’s 2003 Jr.’s German - discourse that discourse 141; Elena Baraban, “Forget the Baraban, Elena 141; with “an enemy with a a with enemy “an with

n te roac and arrogance the and

54, 3 no. 54,

T a tu blurred thus was he dividing line dividing he had apparently had – 4 (2012), (2012), 304 4 scholars like like scholars 87

Aleksandr h Nazi The

The Last Last The Echelon Russian - ds the the ds Soviet Soviet -

CEU eTD Collection 2011), 92 91 90 the of results the regarding analysis. 5, Chapter in discussed be will themes potential other and negatively. or positively Stalingrad portrayals by characters such of portrayals sympathetic of inclusion the by disrupted been has Nazi of discussions presentedand thepossibilitykind ofrepresentationthe war. established a of for new thereby and war, the of narrative Soviet traditional the challenge did Germans, of portrayals that splash of kind the countrymen.” the of portrayal the against KinoP another protagonist,while included film the for page Norris. to according print in the about stereotypes’ ‘habitual from departing for had film the

Su Id 179. “GuidingStars,” Norris,

o en eey im ae fe 2002 after made film every means no . -

35, “Patsifizm ili ekzistentsial’nyye uzhasy mazhora v pubertate,” Comment, Comment, vmazhora pubertate,” uzhasy ekzistentsial’nyye “Patsifizm ili 35, www.kinopoisk.ru/film/95322 oisk page, starting after 2010, after startingpage, oisk h discuss The

. Film critics (or audience members) may then pull from these films these from pull then may members) audience (or critics Film . C . limited critical response. The review in review The response. critical limited 92 iis il iey measure likely will ritics Stalingrad

The issue here is simply that this film was not intended to and did not make not did and to intended not was film this that simply is here issue The o aoe suggests above ion Stalingrad

But the discussion of the Nazi is not only limited to this dichotomy, this to limited only not is Nazi the of discussion the But

and its Nazi. Evidently Nazi. its and

labeled 90

ft emn’ h sm pol wo “ild ilos f our of millions “killed who, people same the German,’ ‘fat

n comment one The fo The .

was. But it, and the other films that contained sympathetic contained that films other the and it, But was. the same figure a figure same the suggest the same dichotomy, with one user Su user one with dichotomy, same the suggest ur comments Norris found on found Norris comments ur

potential Stalingrad had

27 ih glowing with

go Nzs’ nme have number a Nazis,’ ‘good

from the literature, the Soviet motif of evil of motif Soviet the literature, the from

German frames “

blasphemy. gis wa hs oe before, come has what against Isk usstvo Kino usstvo

f mind of enemy, is the only one seemingly one only the is enemy, rie o Gra J.s Nazi Jr.’s German for praise ” 91

Comments written on theon written Comments

The Last Train Last The , which praised the film the praised which , KinoPoisk that could be used in in used be could that , (February 19, 19, (February ,

included such such included

in discussing in - 35 railing 35 ’s

— kino.ru either while CEU eTD Collection http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2314393 95 news/culture/2009/11/10/n_1423016.shtml 94 2012/0 93 Bondarchuk that fact the despite playa Nazi. Tarantino’s Schweiger Til that is reports media early from evident more much changed is what However, roles filming. and script and first the between characters individual how clear not is it though, snippet this Beyond by Katya, lead, female o “Well, supposedlyreacting:German soldiers, the of rape the of depiction and on reliance script’s original the in involved source in review A team. production the joined Grossman’s Vasiliy on 2009. in point some at consideration funding years apparently writing researchingthefirst script, tot and draft submitted between Film an Nazi character, overview the Kahn. film’s of Peter Stalingrad Chapter 3:Background on

And Stalingrad,” Na Deneg Prosit Bondarchuk “Fëdor Gollivuda,” masshtabe “V Naralenkova, Oksana rey Plakhov, “V Raskopkakh Stalingrada,” Stalingrada,” Raskopkakh “V reyPlakhov, 2/08/stalingrad

Production Estimates for the films budget were consistently reported a reported consistently were budget films the for Estimates filmed remainder the with 2011 of fall the in days 17 over place took shooting Initial Before May May , principally production its Inglourious Basterds Inglourious

and delving - July 2012. July site.html Stalingrad

no h methodology the into ie n Fate and Life

’s production, that Snezhkin had been particularly shocked at shocked particularly been had Snezhkin that production, ’s —

However, screenwriter However, G a — and the film’s producers had not yet firmly decided whether whether decided firmlyyet not had producers film’s the and .

turned down an offer to star in the film since he refused to refused film since he the in offer tostar an turned down .

; ra atr h pae te oe f uo tgiz in Stiglitz Hugo of role the played who actor erman the role the Russian statethe roleRussian played the in , though it was heavily edited once Sergey Snezhkin Snezhkin Sergey once edited heavily was it though , Kommersant.ru Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya Gazeta.ru Kommersant’ 94 28 ti thesis this ,

This original script was at least partiallybased least at was script original This ne cannot show how the fascists…our girls.”fascists…our the how show cannotne

Stalingrad , November 10, 2009, 2009, 10, November ,

, October 9, 2013, 9, 2013, October , Il’ya

sug , February 9, 2012, February2012, , 9, il now will

Til’kin reportedly spent nearly 3 nearly spent reportedly Til’kin et, ae o a anonymous an on based gests, round 28 round

provide background on on background provide http://www.gazeta.ru/ that he governmenthefor http://www.rg.ru/ - 30

production m illion illion USD ;

and and 95 ,

CEU eTD Collection no http://www.vedomosti.ru/library/articles/2 Infantil’no»,” uniqueness. theon characters’ emphasis special withextra film warconforming genre was a but drama, simplya notwas filmthat the qualified http://www.rg.ru/2012 102 O for range 101 100 bondarchuk.html 99 2013, 27, September Print, RBK Kirill, Sirotkin 98 97 http://www.rg.ru/2010/07/07/stalingrad 96 one to trying was he emphasized Bondarchuk Likewise, which people,” “about film a rather s of anniversary abo press the of much although And War. er and thunder his stolen Nikita like 2010, Mikhalkov’s in released films war of spat the over worried initially he that asserted been always film. war of kind new a represent to meant was IMAXwar, could something only deliver. experie and grittiness true the in audience the immersing of goal Bondarchuk’s fulfill to IMAX in film to made was decision the Rodnyanskiy Aleksandr producer to According Ledbedev’s Nikolai until production IMAX domestic made it since announcement, release and film to tated

Lyudmila Bezrukova, “Kamni i kadry,” i “Kamni Bezrukova, Lyudmila “Stalingrad i smurfov kul’t molodezh’, zluyu pro Bondarchuk F. Bondarchuk, Fyodor Gollivuda.” masshtabe “V Naralenkova, Oksana 3D,” v fil’m‘Stalingrad’ cnyat’ podumybaet Bondarchuk “Fëdor

. Oksana Naralenkova, “V masshtabe Gollivuda,” Gollivuda,” masshtabe “V Naralenkova, Oksana Infact, Id

. 99

in February 2012 that he was not filming a “ a filming not was he that 2012 February in

His worry turned into relief, however, since these films were nothing like his script.his like nothingwere films these since however, relief, into worryturned His Such statements plays into wider claims made by the production team that team production the by made claims wider into plays statements Such the film had to be limitedly released in St. Petersburg in September in order to meet the calendar meet theto calendar in order September in in Petersburg St. released limitedly be to had film the scar consideration. The film was only widely released in Russia on October 10, 2013. 10, October on in Russia widelyreleased filmonly was The consideration. scar Vedomosti un b te u 2 Sun the by Burnt o iet wr fi war a direct to .

the /02/08/stalingrad cul ate Bnacu atvl downplayed actively Bondarchuk battle, actual , February 10, 2012, 2012, 10, February ,

n IMAX in

See oded public enthusiasm for another film about the Great Patriotic Patriotic Great the about film another for enthusiasm public oded

Anton Dolin, “Aleksandr R “Aleksandr AntonDolin,

Stalingrad m wih msl hd ee seen.” never had myself I “which lm - -

anons.html site.html

D ni Fbur 2012 February until 3D 012/02/10/aleksandr_rodnyanskij_soznanie_russkoj_auditorii_infantil n Aesnr Kott’s Aleksandr and Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya ut the film hyped that hyped film the ut e a nt iig o ees fr the for release to aiming not was he http://top.rbc.ru/viewpoint/27/09/2013/879170.shtml . In a separate interview producer Aleksandr Rodnyanskiy Aleksandr producer interview separate Ina . 97 .

Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya

usas is IA production IMAX first Russia’s

Bondarchuk odnyanskiy: «Soznaniye Russkoy Auditorii Auditorii «SoznaniyeRusskoy odnyanskiy: colossal , April 28, 2011, 2011, April 28, , Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya lgt Crew Flight rs Fortress Brest

, February 9, 2012, February2012, , 9, movie about the Great War,” but War,” Great the about movie . - declared that his that declared Stalingrad p tvn Spielberg’s Steven up 96

hs a isl a historic a itself was This http://www.rg.ru/2011/04/28/ http://www.rg.ru/2011/04/28/ this

s eesd n 2016. in released is 98 would , July 7, , ” v 3D, interview by 3D, v” wih ol have could which , .

101 odrhk also Bondarchuk

— e specifically He initial goal initial 70

mark the 70 the mark 2010, 2010,

n is onl its and th

Stalingrad jubilee. .

Saving Saving nce of of nce had had 102 100 th y

CEU eTD Collection http://www.rg.ru/2014/05/08/stalingrad.html 106 Kirill, Sirotkin 105 http://www.rg.ru/2013/ 104 103 Fund”) “Cinema (hereinafter Cinematography National to Support Economic Stalingrad context, For production. film Russian a for sum astronomical an remains USD million 30 of budget estimated Bondarchuk’s government. Russian the from Russian successful over by watched production; IMAX only and first Russia’s film: historic a such been had film the since in tune to people urged 1 Rossiya on broadcast 10. of were a positive reviews critics’ of half over that citing premiere, the following days the in film the defend to quick was Rodnyanskiy audiences, and critics from reactions mixed certainly were many the days 11 only after 2013 of film grossing highest big. off paid evidently wereopinion Ryan Private

Susanna Al’perina, “‘Stalingrad’: novyy front,” front,” novyy Al’perina,“‘Stalingrad’: Susanna interview by 3D, v “Stalingrad” i smurfov kul’t molodezh’, zluyu pro Bondarchuk F. Bondarchuk, Fyodor front,” novyy “‘Stalingrad’: ValeriyKuznetsov, Id .

105 Stalingrad a filming of gambit Bondarchuk’s

Stalingrad nd reviewers on KinoPoisk.ru scored the film higher than average than higher film the scored KinoPoisk.ru on reviewers nd

nedobrozhelateli nedobrozhelateli war filmwar had normally received normally had State Support State RBK but , youths between 12and 25. , September 27, 2013, 2013, 27, September , s nros ucs ws ae osbe y eakbe iaca support financial remarkable by possible made was success enormous ’s 10/21/kino ie t tuh Russia’s touch to aimed in Russian s iaca sces n pplrt wr ald t we te im was film the when to allude were popularity and success financial ’s

on May 9, 2014. Press materials announcing the television premier television the announcing materials Press 2014. 9, May on Stalingrad Stalingrad

- [ill site

distribution -

- wishers] wishers] anons.html only a few million from million few a only http://top.rb was .

6 million million 6 103 n unprecedented an rig epe o t se h film the see to not people urging .

. Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya

Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya

new kind of war film for the youngest generation youngest the for film war of kind new 106

c.ru/viewpoint/27/09/2013/879170.shtml theatergoing audience, which which audience, theatergoing 30

— usas haeges and theatergoers; Russians despite , May 8, 2014, May , 2014, 8, , as , , October 21, 2013, 2013, 21, October ,

iaca success, financial the Federal Fund for Social and Social for Fund Federal the most most Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya Russian war films films war Russian . — in 104

overall 7.2 out out 7.2 overall .

a the was becoming Bondarchuk huh there Though

—

n a and reported, befo most

th lso re re ’s ’s e e

CEU eTD Collection sovetFonda,” “Popechitel’skiy 110 8. 2010), 109 central_partnership_snimet_film_o_lve_yashine partnership,’” ‘Tsentral http://izvestia.ru/news/559639 108 War,” 107 million 6 (approximately rubles million 250 roughly granted was which of each Pictures, Tri Studio Mikhalkov’s including selected, In were budget. companies annual Fund’s Cinema the of share film a given and television to related corporations broadcasting state several from CEOs and ministers; V President to advisor anTolstoy, Vladimir Federation; Russian included: generally answer would support re the with council, this of fruits pro and protect to safeguards establishing and effective more film national for support state making Putin. Vladimir Minister Prime by chaired personally and Governmen the 2008 December In state. the by supported and funded were films how in occurring were changes Bank, and 1; Rossiya network television corporations state estimated his of entirety these recoup not did usually

“History and Mission,” Mission,” and “History Federation Russian the in Industry Film The «Stalingrad za Putinu “«Spasibo Yusipova, Larisa and Bondarchuk Fyodor World the Second at LookBack Russia and Screen: Ukraine theon Silver Wars “Memory SerhyYekelchyk, Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies European Journal of New Zealand and Australian of which the of

ing major 2009, in government the from funding sought Bondarchuk that time the At oe h Rsin im nuty Te olwn December following The industry. film Russian the mote

h pouto, itiuin n ehbto of exhibition and distribution production, the . 110 directly to the Government of Russia, and has a Board of Trustees that has that Trustees of Board a has and Russia, of Government the to directly

These Trustees are responsible for choosing top national film studios to be to studios film national top choosing for responsible are Trustees These : 10 million USD from the Cinema Fund; Cinema the from USD million 10 :

state Vedomosti Nikita Mikhalkov, Chairman of the Union of Cinematographers of the the of Cinematographers of Union the of Chairman Mikhalkov, Nikita t Council for the Development of Russian Cinematography was founded founded wasCinematography Russian of Development the for Council t Cinema Fund Cinema

is a majorityis shareholder

30 million 30 ; Kseniya Boletskaya and Aleksey Rozhkov, “Fil’m O L’ve Yashine snimet snimet YashineL’ve “Fil’m O Rozhkov, Aleksey and Boletskaya ; Kseniya Fond Kino Fond , May 16, 2013, 2013, May16, ,

costs

, n.d., accessed May 29, 2015, May29, accessed n.d., , - salsigo h ieaFn, hc a tse with tasked was which Fund, Cinema the of establishing

, n

after release after either directly from the state or through investment from investment through or state the from directly either oehr na 20 near somewhere d., accessed May 29, 2015, 2015, May29, accessed d.,

(Strasbourg: E (Strasbourg: .

http://www.vedomosti.ru/lifestyle/articles/2013/05/16/ http://www.vedomosti.ru/lifestyle/articles/2013/05/16/ 31

. 107 . 108

Yet, Bondarchuk eventually recei eventually Bondarchuk Yet, uropean Audiovisual Observatory, September September Observatory, Audiovisual uropean

5, no. 2 (2013), 5. 5. 2 no. (2013), 5,

ilo USD million 109 national http://eng.fond

http://fond at least at 00 fr xml, ih film eight example, for 2010,

This council was charged with charged was council This ladimir Putin; various deputy various Putin; ladimir - »,” e n Bnacu’ Art Bondarchuk’s and Te

Izvestia films

6 million USD from the from USD million 6 -

kino.ru/fund/structure/ witnessed the apparent apparent the witnessed - kino.ru/fund/mission/ rm usas VTB Russia’s from . The Cinema Fund Fund Cinema The . , October 28, 2013, 28, October , ved .

; the CEU eTD Collection 2013, 115 http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2013/05/22/peskov_nepravda_chto_surkovskoe_nasledie_eto_ploho 114 http://ria.ru/culture/20090417/168379405.html 113 112 111 Zvyagintsev’s Andrei as such state, the of goals ideological supposed the to counter run to funding provided state the though evenAnd did blockbuster, patriotic major he a that mention to though manage films, unworthy funding for task to him take to Fund Cinema the of head Medins Vladimir Culture of Minister the announcement, values.” national and to funded spiritual it “affirmative films promote expected it that stance government’s the reaffirmed Peskov Dmitriy release. its following and production film’s 2009. that known well Bondarc is it go, connections Bondarchuk’s deep how about interviewer the by model. set small a and script” a Bon days darkest that said Izvestia supporting in involved inlate 2009orsome point 2010. at Fund Cinema the from USD million 10 guaranteed was Bondarchuk that given budget, euros).

Id nasledi Surkovskoye chto Nepravda, “Peskov: “Izvest «Stalingrad».” za Putinu “«Spasibo Yusipova, Larisa and Bondarchuk Fyodor Federation Russian the in Industry Film The .; “Medinskiy: Fond kino dolzhen proizodit’ patrioticheskiye blokbastery,” blokbastery,” patrioticheskiye proizodit’ dolzhen kino “Medinskiy: Fond .; www.rg.ru/2013/05/22/medinskiy 113 111 t hud e oe ta sbtnil hne ocre i sae im oiy uig the during policy film state in occurred changes substantial that noted be should It personally was Putin Vladimir that suggestion some least at gave Bondarchuk

that no one interfered on his behalf tosecure interferedhisbehalf his that noone on nyy rezhissër Fëdor Bondarchuk vstupil v partiyu ‘Yedinaya Rossiya,’” Rossiya,’” ‘Yedinaya vpartiyu vstupil Bondarchuk Fëdor rezhissër nyy huk has been an active and formal member of Putin’s United Russia party since since party Russia United Putin’s of member formal and active an been has huk

Stalingrad t s paet hwvr ta te iea Fund Cinema the that however, apparent, is It darchuk apparently turned to the Prime Minister when when Minister Prime the to turned apparently darchuk

could not have been made made been have not could

Stali ngrad

112

- anons.html

Though Wie Bondarchuk While . . , 17. 17. ,

ye . - Bondarchuk only bl only Bondarchuk

eto plokho,” plokho,” eto In May 2013, May In 32

films that have been considered anti consideredbeenhave that films

withou Stalingrad Vedomosti

loan from VTB loan 114 k Vaii Ptns support Putin’s Vladimir t claimed i

a gvn upr otie f this of outside support given has y announced he had met with the the with met had he announced y

Vladimir Putin’s Press Secretary Secretary Press Putin’s Vladimir

fw as eoe Peskov’s before days few A usters in a follow a in usters , May 22, 2013, 2013, May , 22, , would soon be released. be soon would Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya uig n neve with interview an during

RIA Novosti RIA , in his next breath his next he , in Stalingrad , April 17, 2009, 2009, April 17, , - up question up

- , May 22, May22, , w regime or regimeor — as “on as n his in

115 ly ly

CEU eTD Collection 120 119 «Stalingrad»,” “Medinskiy,Putin, Rassledovaniy Politicheskikh 118 spb.ru/news 117 http://news.yahoo.com/oscar 116 thepost amiss with as such which further theaters in being it despite film, the watched had Putin President whetherknow not did he that interviewsame the in admitted policy. and funding film state surrounding climate current the under that interview an in acknowledged publically Bondarchuk even And media. social Russian on shared widely apparently was bread.” of piece a for Motherland “ which,in film a was claimed reportedly aide the which film, the overaide Putin a byrebuked with displeased was beca sacked been actually had Demidov that online speculation some least link not did press mainstream from the resigned While office. Trustees, of Board Fund’s Cinema the on point one at and film of charge Cultur of Minister Deputy Demidov, Ivan released, was film the after weeks few a only 2013, November In expected. had Kremlin the what not was film the that rumblings media viewing domestically. film recent usa slir lo lk iit, n Rsin women Russian and idiots, like look soldiers Russian

Id «Stalingrad».” za Putinu “«Spasibo Yusipova, Larisa and Bondarchuk Fyodor LiveJournal, ministra,” portfelya Medinskomu mozhet stoit’ “Fil’m ‘Stalingrad’ api_x, iz uvolili “Demidova “Oscar .

Putin Putin concedes hl Saiga ws etil nt esrd tee ee t es sm independent some least at were there censored, not certainly was Stalingrad While Legend - Tipped ‘Leviathan’ Released in Russia, Defying Complaints,” Complaints,” Defying in Russia, ‘Leviathan’ Released Tipped /comments15184.htm Leviathan had No. 17 No.

that Putin had attended screenings for Bondarchuk’sfilm for had 2005 attendedthat Putin screenings stated he stated - premiere particularlygovernment, reaction ofsilence. the Putin’s - za Bondarchuka,” Bondarchuka,” za Stalingrad , the state is also willing to take action to censor or ban such films from films such ban or censor to action take to willing also is state the , 116 . 120 - , (November 2, 2013), 2013), 2, , (November

tipped

At the very least then all of this suggests that something appeared something that suggests this of all then least very the At greatly enjoyed, as well as several other films released in 2013, in released films other several as well as enjoyed, greatly . Polit.ru

leviathan . 117

for over a week. After some further probing, Bondarchuk probing, further some After week. a over for 118

There were also claims that Vladimir Medinsk Vladimir that claims also were There , November 5, 2013, 2013, 5, November , APN Severo APN Stalingrad

Though this appears to be nothing more than rumor, it rumor, than more nothing be to appears this Though - released www.api - 33 - russia Zapad

ol nt ae eevd h fnig t had it funding the received have not would Stalingrad - - x.livejournal.com/11 defying , December 8, 2013, 2013, December 8, , http://polit.ru/article/2013/11/05/al051113 - complaints r pottts ray o el the sell to ready prostitutes, are

Yahoo News Yahoo to this resignation, there was at was there resignation, this to -

110437155.html 78.html www.apn , 119 use Vladimir Putin Putin Vladimir use ; Andrey Levkin, Andrey ; Agentstvo Agentstvo

odrhk also Bondarchuk - 9 th i . y had been had y

Company

e in e , CEU eTD Collection zreniya, 122 2013, 11, October 11.10.13 ot kino Industriya ‘Stalingrade’. O Bondarchuk Fёdor Kretschmann, Tomas Tsulaya, Dariko 121 has Kahn tuberculosis. apparently before Masha visited andcanned brings her food. of died who Christina, wife his resembles she because her visits featuring scene first the In Russian. with communicate actually cannot he that Masha, woman, Russian a with romance a mainly is story his protagonists, Russian other the and importantthat is for me.” “In because, Rodnyanskiy. pro with film the discussing from on up picked also had interviewer the hope” no and exit “no had who character, the of complexity the of because role the to drawn was he that interview one in indicated Kretschmann production officers. Nazi playing German 1993 the in role first his since history long a has who soldiersRussian defendingseek theGermans tocontrol. thehouse the of leader film’s the Gromov, Captain of to foil a quarter as functions He one minutes. 33 roughly over or runtime, slightly for onscreen film, the in character central a is Kahn Pet Hauptmann film: the in character Nazi major the on background some provide Stalingrad Stalingrad

Thomas Kretschmann, Ya eshchë raz okunut’sya v etu istoriyu, raskryt’ eë s drugoy storony, s russkoy tochki tochki srusskoy storony, sdrugoy eë vraskryt’ etu istoriyu, okunut’sya raz eshchë Ya Thomas Kretschmann, by interview nedezhdy»,” i net netvykhoda geroya «U moyego Krechmann: “Tomas Thomas Kretschmann, Kommersant’ This complexity plays out onscr out plays complexity This Kretschmann, Thomas actor German the to went eventually Kahn Peter of role The surrounding controversy the on discourse the examining is thesis this that Given , particularly its depiction of the Nazi, it is both appropriate and necessary here to to here necessary and appropriate both is it Nazi, the of depiction its particularly , Stalingrad 121 KinoPoisk ’s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPKBoYDCa_0

In another interview Kretschmann explained that he took the role of Kahn, of role the took he that explained Kretschmann interview another In Nazi Figure: Peter Kahn Kahn Peter NaziFigure: , October 4, 2013, 4, October , , August 20, 2013, 2013, 20, August ,

my character is not a Nazi monster, but rather a living person, and person, living a rather but monster, Nazi a not is character my

122

http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2305706 the two [33:45 to 37:55] Kahn tries to explain that he that explain to tries Kahn 37:55] to [33:45 two the http://www.kinopoisk.ru/interview/2225733/ een. Though Kahn is pitted against Captain Gromov Gromov Captain against pitted is Kahn Though een. 34

—

h sek n Gra, n h no he and German, no speaks she .

, Fil’m Pro, YouTube, YouTube, ,Fil’m Pro, ; — Pёtr Fёdorov, Fёdorov, Pёtr ducer Aleksandr Aleksandr ducer something that that something Stalingrad er Kahn. er

of CEU eTD Collection teenager, a only clearly recruit, young a of presence the acknowledges Kahn assault first the to 1:16:20]. [1:11:10 idiot” mindless a into officer best myturned whore] “[this Russian position: Russian the assault successfully not does he if execution with threatened is he where headquarters, returns blatantly but motorcycle, armored an on cars train to on herded being career his than Masha about more cares clearly Kahn But officer. an as failed has Kahn that claim the to leads and “speechless” Henze renders by discovered later is Kahn the gives following soliloquy: and Masha, nude a to next bed, Masha’s on sitting depicted is Kahn thereafter clothe her tears forcefully and floor, picks her thearrives dialogue, upoff without room,hergrabs knife hands, inher andfrom the Russians storm the square and the the ablaze, set is bus the After doing!” you are name God’s in “What out, yells and square the enters Kahn torched, is bus the Before 44:50]. to [40:55 bus a of inside alive a be to daughter and mother Jewish a selects then colonel Nazi The ‘demonstration.’ a for square the onto Masha, including dwellers, which in The last third of the movie involves t involves movie the of third last The love. forbidden a mind to brings point this after screen on portrayed relationship The ainto beast. [53:10 know you not victory, You You’re for back. fighting people. the in you someone shoot against who’d war bandits, all wage You’re honor. to of nothing impossible It’s hero… A hero. a me to Born Cross. Iron an of Recipient Kahn. Pr respected Peter animal. filthy this at look a Take He complex. housing Masha’s entering dirty, and bloodied shown, next is Kahn th events the of aware not is Kahn that clear is It brtetat Henze Oberstleutnant

ussian stock. Field Marshall Paulus…invited me to lunch once. He called He once. lunch to me Paulus…invited Marshall Field stock. ussian

ensuing German results ina battle retreat. - 54:55] 54:55] Oberstleutnant want revenge. I came here as a soldier…you’ve turned me turned soldier…you’ve a as here came I revenge. want Kh’ cmadn ofcr odr al ueos city numerous all orders officer, commanding Kahn’s ,

off s — wo final assaults on the Russian position. During position. Russian the on assaults final wo “sacrifice to the old Gods,” having them burned them having Gods,” old the to “sacrifice

35 imd n lw oin [46:10 motion slow in filmed ez half Henze

— at would transpire directly after this, this, after directly transpire would at he not only saves her from a crowd crowd a from her saves only not he - rse i Msas om whic room, Masha’s in dressed

75] Shortly 47:50]. her to the Nazi the to her h CEU eTD Collection consequently sideof a(and thewar, theGerman at romanticized) human indeed times face. his Russians, romance the opposing in plot overall the to central certainly is he While rage. great and love great of capable is who and war the with disillusioned become has who individual sa a means no by advancing German forces. the destroy to position own their on in call Russians the that fire artillery by demolished is slump even and standoff a in other each wound mortallytwo The Gromov. for searches activelyand tanks, several of support the with finally house the on assault the leads enraged, Kahn, motion. slow in shot and music somber with set scene a is Masha them, a between being for characters Russian the of one by head the in tenderness shot deliberately much after Unfortunately, her. with life his begin can he battle the after that so safety to Masha ferry to tries then Kahn 1:35:50]. to [1:35:36 love toone Kahnfinally another. cries War!Damn country! Damned “Damned out building!” theirexpress thetwo lap, his Masha’sin headwith room, Masha’s in chance.finalSitting one retreat. troops the as down gunned soldier young this has film The reinforcements. of part as sent been has who This character is unlike anything seemingly shown in Soviet film. Certainly, Kahn is Kahn Certainly, film. Soviet in shown seemingly anything unlike is character This

with Masha and his musings are not. Instead, these aspects give him, and and him, give aspects these Instead, not. are musings his and Masha with Kahn is again rebuked as a disgrace to the Wehrmacht, though he is given is he though Wehrmacht, the to disgrace a as rebuked again is Kahn n. u h i dpce hr a a a, ih als n emotions and faults with man, a as here depicted is he But int.

into one another, until the house house the until another, one into “German whore” “German — —

CEU eTD Collection ofMethod,” Problems CulturalHistory: and MemoryStudies,” 102 Challenges,” Researchfor Solutions Methodological 16 2011), Macmillan, Palgrave Age Media New a in Memory Collective in Introduction,” Editors’ Memory: “On Media Zandberg, Eyal and Meyers, Oren Eric in Studies,” Memory Collective Commonin 123 after, during, talked always have people that proposition the to book her of chapter entire of one Staiger, research, Janet audience of years 25 despite that remarked research, reception film contemporary of state the on reflecting in Allen, C. Robert paradigm. research deficient a reveals field the of overview in methodologies reception of adoption the for pushed Studies Reception analysisapproach below. outlined critic film examine the and research and body data and formation memory film to related processes internalization. about questions larger answering metho and theory the that highlighting by gap perceived this rectify to attempted have scholars Several regard. this literature in deficiency the serious a studies, suggests memory collective for path research natural a like seems vehicles Chapter 4: Methodology

Mark A. Wolfgram, “The Memory “The A. Mark Wolfgram, - 104, 106; Wulf106; 104, Langenbacher, Bill Niven, and Ruth Wittlinger (Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2012), 56 2012), Books, Berghahn (Oxford: Ruth and Wittlinger Niven, Bill Langenbacher, reception studies and audience research audience and receptionstudies hl shlr o cletv mmr lk Wl Kntie ad ln ofn have Confino Alon and Kansteiner Wulf like memory collective of scholars While react and receive films of consumers how understanding While conducting an analysis. This analysis. an conducting 123

History and Theory and History

Kansteiner, “Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective ofCollective Critique A Methodological in Memory: “Finding Meaning Kansteiner,

methodological limitations and constraints and limitations methodological Since this project is focused on the discourse surrounding a film, it it film, a surrounding discourse the on focused is project this Since ’ eiw of reviews s’

17); Mark A. Wolfgram, “The Process of Collective Memory Research: Memory ofCollective Process “The A. Mark Wolfgram, 17);

the biggest names in reception, still felt, “the need to devote an an devote to need“the felt, still reception, in names biggest the -

Market Dictum: Gauging the Inherent Bias in Different Data Sources Data inDifferent Bias the Inherent Gauging Dictum: Market 41, no. 2 (May 2002): 180, 195 180, (May 2 no. 2002): 41, , ed. Motti Neiger, Oren Me Oren Neiger, ed.Motti , Stalingrad

The American Historical Revi Historical American The Dynamics of Memory and Identity in Contemporary Europe Contemporary in Identity and Memory of Dynamics

chapter German Politics and Society and Politics German

wih ee hn nlzd sn te thematic the using analyzed then were which , in 37

choosing

first outl first

yers, and Eyal Zandberg (New York: (New York: Zandberg Eyalyers, and an appropriate method for locating a a locatingfor method appropriate an the study of collective memory, an an memory, collective of study the ds of reception studies could aid in aid could studies reception of ds - 197; 197; ines the state of reception studies reception of state the ines

ew of the field. The thesis The field. the of Alon Confino, “Collective Memory “CollectiveMemory AlonConfino, , 1997, 1395 1997, ,

On Media Memory: Memory: Media On 25, no. 81 (Spring 2007): (Spring 2007): no. 25, 81 - - 57; Motti Neiger, Neiger, 57; Motti 1399. 1399. o uh cultural such to

looks tolooks ps to opts , ed. , CEU eTD Collection Filmof Reception Practices The Spectators: Co Kiss,”in 127 46. 1999), SagePublications, in Paradigms,” Rival between AudienceResearch Media Worlds? ofBoth Best “The Schrøder, 32; Kim Christian 1999), Publications, in Audiences,” Tro The Retrospect: in Research Reception and “Audience Gray, 14; Ann 1999), Publications, in Studies,” ofReception 2008 Press, University (Edinburgh Michael Pickering ed. in Counts,” “Why Counting Deacon, David 217; 2013), Publications, 126 Cultural Memory and Cinema Ginger: in as CulturalMemory,” Memory “Cinema Kuhn, Annette 2; 2011), Routledge, NY: in Introduction,” 125 124 re a remains basic most its at film a of audience the Though before. ever than complex more is audience both been fanzines, reviews, comments, online entries, diary andblogs. to endeavor researchers which in leaves,” tea the “reading deems Jenkins Henry what involves generate. studies such data and samples involved costs the to due mainly abandoned, been essentially has reactions their recording and individuals ofphysicallyHowever,film. methods observing peoplespecifically watchingthe physical the outside thetheater.contours ofthe screen or studies. the movies.” watching before) said, also have might she (and ach of any research team, the traditional identifiers of audience such as sharing a medium, a sharing as such audience of identifiers traditional the team, research any of ach

- Allen,48 L. John An Modernity: and Audiences “Cinema, Meers, Philippe and Maltby, Richard DanielBiltereyst, History,” Film American “Relocating Allen, C. Robert study audiences by analyzing what was left behind after a viewing: letters to the editor, the to letters viewing: a after behind left was what analyzing by audiences study published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press, 2000), 167; Staiger, Janet 167; 2000), Press, University Oxford by America of States the United in published result away ofthe(thecenter as shift film) thetext ofanalysis recent the from inreception This type of contextual approach has its has approach contextual of type This reception film recent More

Reinventing Film Studies Film Reinventing 125

Sullivan, Sullivan,

- enriched collective of receivers of collective 81; Henry Jenkins, “Reception Theory and Audience Research: The Mystery of the Vampire’s the Vampire’s of Mystery The AudienceResearch: and Theory “Reception HenryJenkins, 81;

o to og h fed ipy i nt ae ht a hpeig eod the beyond happening was what care not did simply field the long too For Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda The Audience: Media the Rethinking Cinema Audiences and Modern and Audiences Cinema and serious concerns over the representativeness and generalizability of the the of generalizability and representativeness the over concerns serious and Media Audiences: Effects, Users, Institutions, and Power and Institutions, Users, Effects, Audiences: Media and problematized b problematized and

Rethinking the Media Audience: The New Agenda The Media Audience: the Rethinking

Rethinking the Media the Rethinking , ed. Linda Williams and Christin and Linda Williams ed. ,

(New York: New York University Press, 2002), 3 2002), Press, University York New York: (New , most of whom are generally unobservable or beyond the beyond or unobservable generally are whom of most , studies have centered on studying the audience, or more more or audience, the studying on centered have studies

(New York: New York University Press, 2000), 43 2000), Press, University York (New New York: y the advent of the Internet the of advent the y ity: An Introduction ity:An 126

Audience: The New Agenda The Audience:

38 nta, ot otmoay uine research audience contemporary most Instead, ),92

Cultural Studies Cultural

advantages and disadvantages and advantages - 93; Pertti Alasuutari, “Introduction: Three Phases Three “Introduction: Alasuutari, Pertti 93; , ed. Pertti Alasuutari (London: Sage Sage Alasuutari (London: ed. , Pertti e Gledhill (London : New York: Arnold; NewYork: (London : Gledhill e , ed. Daniel Biltereyst (Oxon ; New York, York, New (Oxon ; DanielBiltereyst ed. , Research Methods for Cultural Studies Cultural for Methods Research 124

127 But this seemingly sorry state is state sorry seemingly this But

20, no. 1 (2006): 57. (2006): 57. 1 no. 20, , ed. Pertti Alasuutari (London: Sage Sage (London: Alasuutari ed. , Pertti

(Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE SAGE Calif: (ThousandOaks, , ed. Pertti Alasuutari (London: ed. , (London: Alasuutari Pertti . . For one, the concept of of concept the one, For Dreaming of Fred and and Fred of Dreaming - 4. 4.

uble withuble -

55. 55. which ,

Perverse Perverse have have , CEU eTD Collection University York NewYork: 130 129 128 Post the in particularly posters, online about data demographic basic identify to able being of issues made only creating and fan videos fiction. their own And writers. screen s doing are and they increasingly producers directors, on loose let to quick are fans wrong, goes producers media traditional andmessages media traditional supplementing produ active to spectator passive from shifted definitively has audience of concept the which in culture,” “participatory a to turn a of claims to led and mind, one’s speaking of costs the decreased also generally have provides anony The scale. unprecedented an on members audience other with connect to them allowing hated, or loved they films and to blogs dedicated wikis, all webpages rooms, chat forums, from away clicks few a merely now are members h subset or layer aaudience of modern today. sample. been outdated rendered have measures audience traditional audiences, potential diverse and disparate such Withpark. the in gym or the at while phone their on or tablet, their with metro the on laptops, at films consuming increasingly also are they movies, the to going certainly revolution. digital the by dismantled been have time or place, v te en wt wih uine members audience which with means the ave

Sullivan, 216 Sullivan, Sullivan,217. 193; Kansteiner, DenisMcQ But while all of this material is a treasure trove for reception studies, its existence has existence its studies, reception for trove treasure a is material this of all while But has audience of concept as just And 129

At best, film reception methodologies may be able to provide insight into a single a into insight provide to able be may methodologies reception film best, At uail, - 219; Henry 219; Jenkins, Audience Analysis Audience — and it is next to impossible for any r any for impossible to next is it and representativeness and generalizabi and representativeness Press, 2006), 149 2006), Press,

o by creating their own multi own their creating by o

Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture Participatory Gamers: Exploring and Bloggers, Fans,

(Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1997), 1 1997), SagePublications, Calif: Oaks, (Thousand - 153. 153. cer.

130

39 become become

uh uine ae en s otaitn and contradicting as seen are audiences Such

ics and discuss more convoluted in the digital age digital the in convoluted more lity all the more complicated. complicated. more the all lity esearcher to claim a representative a claim to esearcher - media products, going so far as to as far so going products, media

iy n acs te Internet the access and mity neat ih im. Audience films. with interact 128

hl pol ae still are people While — - 2; Alasuutari, 6. 6. Alasuutari, 2; when something when

home on their on home

(New Even

, s , o - CEU eTD Collection an Eurasian LiveJournal,” on Membership Group Political “Examining MacLeod, Heather 31; 2011), Routledge, NewYork: (London ; Rulyova Natalia and Hutchings, Stephen Beumers, Birgit in Russia,” in Elections http://download.yandex.ru/company/ya_russian_regions_report_2013.pdf 2013) (Yandex, Regions” Russia’s in the “Developmentof Internet 2014); Routledge, (London: Edition Kindle Communication NewMedia of Politics and Culture 132 New Media Central and European Eurasian Russian, 131 1 first the only results include not did Yandex on ranges media social Russian of studies most in tool a as ( function search blog Russian Yandex’s using with results (1) thesis: this for unmanageable simply was material this access to trying in arose that issues technical the 5, over produced “Germans” and “Bondarchuk” “Stalingrad,” rich quite hypothetically is approach this Conclusion, the in detail more in discussed As sites. e discourseand tostudy why. Stalingrad urban youngresearcher of realm the largely students still and is professionals expensive, less becoming and regions the Russi the in And etc. another; over entry blog given a of significance the operationalize to how results; engine search of hundreds excluding are that settings other or privacy of what deleted, or moderated t various generates also it accessible, possible. not simply is space, Soviet ffort

Michael S Gorham, Inguun Lunde, and Martin Paulsen, “Int Paulsen, Martin and Lunde, Inguun Gorham, Michael S ofMemory,” Language the and Diasporas Digital Wars: “Web EllenRutten, —

a search on the popular blogging platform blogging popular the on search a n xlrn te osblt o aayig nie omns n usa sca media social Russian on comments online analyzing of possibility the exploring in In sifting through possible subjects of study, this project this study, of subjects possible through sifting In d Central European New Media European Central d

f nie icus i ta country. that in discourse online of audience 00 an Federation social media and Internet use, though rapidly expanding into into expanding rapidly though use, Internet and media social Federation an LiveJournal Globalisation, Freedom and the Media the and Freedom Globalisation,

has

ostensibly —

known dates on LiveJournal were not appearing in date ranges date in appearing not were LiveJournal on dates known

asn qetos f ersnaiees n smls o any for samples and representativeness of questions raising results

become the become

1, no. 1 (2009), 14 1 no. 1, 131 ee accessible were echnical and methodological issues: what has been been has what issues: methodological and echnical

, ed. Michael S Gorham, Inguun Lunde, and Martin Paulsen, MartinPaulsen, and Lunde, Inguun Michael ,Gorham, ed. S that had been had that n tog mtra mgt t is se readily seem first at might material though And , no. 4 (2010), 172 4 no. (2010), , 40 https://blogs.yandex.ru/

132 ; (2) search(2) ; question of which of question

LiveJournal.ru using the terms (in Russian) Russian) (in terms the using LiveJournal.ru

The larger larger The roduction,” in roduction,” - after Communism: The PastFuture The as Communism: after 16. 16.

sn LvJunls erh function search LiveJournal’s using

found found Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Studies Russian, in Icons: Digital es conducted for overlapping date overlapping for conducted es - 173. 173. ; Daphne Skillen, “The Next General General Next “The Skillen, ; Daphne 740 question in Digital Russia: The Language, Language, The Russia: Digital

spent considerable time and and time considerable spent

Digital Icons: Studies in in Studies Icons: Digital previous searches; and (3) (3) and searches; previous results in April 2015. But 2015. April in results sub ) - , which has been used used been has which ,

segment of segment of of o t suy the study to how the wider wider the , ed. ed. , , , CEU eTD Collection Research Consumer 135 Arts,” Performing Popular and in Highbrow Mediation Cultural Publics: “Critics and Wesley 104; Shrum, 2003), Bud and Power, Critics,Star ofFilm BoxEffects Office The Reviews? 134 133 decision members’ audience of predictor a bot and choice as audience act to argued been have reviews film Rather, study. reception go even subvert, beyond, what therun or critics film say in w interact and pan, critics that films see to choose do consumers whims, the have they audience as same the not is film a to response critical social in film a seen yet situations. not have who those for reference of frames provide and film, the which through go a become have reviews film generates, it material the through reaction audience analyzing and context historical p literature film studies analyzing: reception in worthwhile equally but manageable more arguably Critics Film and Film Reviews thesis i surrounding discourse of amount vast seemingly a is there how know and tools right the with that suggest to is here issues these raising in aim The Google. to attempt an despite

Jenkins, 170; Morris B. Holbrook, “Popular A “Popular B.Holbrook, Morris 170; Jenkins, 169 Jenkins, 164. 68, Staiger, Kuhn,5; American Journal of of Sociology Journal American s merely scratching. But this should not suggest that film reviews are not a worthwhile endeavor of of endeavor worthwhile a not are reviews film that suggest not should this But is that research studies reception of focus traditional another chose instead thesis This 134

- But it should be clear from the outset, as outset, the from clear be should it But 171; Suman Basuroy, Subimal Chatterjee, and S. Abraham Ravid, “How Critical Are Critical Are Critical “HowCritical Ravid, and Abraham S. Chatterjee, Subimal SumanBasuroy, 171; oe to power

26, no. 2 (September 1999): 146. 1999): 2 no. (September 26,

public forms or reinforces its opinions or expectations about a particular particular a about expectations or opinions its reinforces or forms public ii ti fnto by function this mimic

completely -

to staple. to

bihd n h 20s msl amd t salsig socio establishing at aimed mostly 2000s, the in ublished , 97, no. 2 (Sept. 1991), 352. 352. 1991), 2 no. (Sept. 97, ,

133 nlec te ass o hi on esnl ats and tastes personal own their to masses the influence

This is mainly because film reviews act as a conduit a as act reviews film because mainly is This ppeal versus Expert Judgments of Motion Pictures,” Pictures,” Motion Judgmentsof Expert versus ppeal

construct Henry Jenkins rightfully cautions, th cautions, rightfully Jenkins Henry response.

- ing gets,” up toafilm’s release.

a Custom Search Engine on on Engine Search Custom a Journal of Marketing of Journal Stalingrad 135 - making

While critics While ith films ith h an influencer of of influencer an h —

online, which this which online,

claims that have have that claims reviews. In the the In reviews.

may believe may in waysthat in

67 (October (October 67 Journal of of Journal at - - CEU eTD Collection 138 137 Marketing of Journal Budgets,” and Power, Critics,Star EffectsOffice of Film Box The Reviews? AreCritical “HowCritical Ravid, Data,” Matter? Reviews “DoOnline Whinston, Andrew B. Gu,and Bin Duan, Moviegoers,” on Critic Ratings and 136 will scholars later since media, mass contemporary in imagery Nazi studying in example, for that a selected, and located were discussed of devoid was material this of much Unfortunately, liter from studies reception published recently Body Data the Identifying increasingly theability have to‘” also are reviews these using norms or memories identit national of ideals of even potentially and memory collective and moods, values, response. audience sensibiliti culture’s their guarding are who makers” “taste or keepers” “gate as described been have reviewers film way, this In readers. of logic and tastes norms, to This to speak effectively to able be to needs reviewer a successful, be to often is this reviewers professional supported. empirically been

Holbrook, 146 Holbrook, Criticism,” withFilm Problem “The Charles Taylor, 560; Tsao, Wen and be framed in a way so as to as so waya in framed be and tr o Nz iaey n as ei t slc a aporae olcin method collection appropriate an select to media mass in imagery Nazi on ature

the material was more or less or more was material the implies that film reviews retain a cultural resonance, since a successful review successful areviewsresonance,since cultural a retainfilm that implies Decision Support Systems Support Decision - Chin Tsao, “Which Type of Online Review Is More Persuasive? The Influence of Consumer Reviews Reviews Consumer Influence of The Persuasive? More Is Review ofOnline “WhichType Tsao, Chin In order to identify the corpus of online of corpus the identify to order In - 147; Shrum,351 147;

67 (October 2003), 103 2003), (October 67 138

Therefore, film reviews film Therefore,

transform

culturally specific specific culturally

45 (2008): 1009 (2008): 45 136 -

352. 352. Electron

Regardless of why a reviewer pens a review a pens reviewer a why of Regardless like,” share and commentand ontheselike,”reviews. very share

cherry discuss how a particular film particular a how discuss ing ing revolves around around revolves ic Commerce Research Commerce ic

- 104. 104. n approach that leaves that approach n ; as public displays of the socially acceptable norms norms acceptable socially the of displays public as ; no cul ie o fl discussion film of sites actual into - – picked 1010; Suman Basuroy, Subimal Chatterjee, and Chatterjee, Subimal Suman 1010; Basuroy,

nme of number a 42 themes and frames and themes may

. Such an approach creates a major handicap, major a creates approach an Such . y; Stalingrad

and act as a window into a particular culture’s particular a into window a as act financial i financial any discussion of how of discussion any as mediums for discussion of societal of discussion for mediums as Dissent

14, no. 4 (December 2014): 563; Wenjing Wenjing 563; 2014): 4 no. (December 14,

coal journals scholarly

- film reviews the thesis looked to looked thesis the reviews film

An Empirical Investigation of Panel ofPanel Investigation An Empirical

, Fall 2011, 8 Fall 2011, , nterest the reader with reader the measures against the against measures that can can that

his or her or his and incentive and es while also mediating also while es 1.

though the film reviews film the

, since readers readers since ,

as well as the the as well as the impre the analyzed. readership.

S. AbrahamS. — must play must — in order in cultural and for and ssion ssion And And 137 .

CEU eTD Collection 2015, SiteOverview,” “Kinopoisk.ru: Yahoo. Ebay both and of ahead but directly Twitter, 142 141 475 (Summer2010): 140 1 2007): (Fall 139 individual as well Amazon. of websites Ru with popular extremely is site The Russian website Russian outside North America, inlanguagesEnglish. or other than published criticisms those eliminating after 119 to reduced later was which reviews, total film 2007 the for reviews locate to index, review film online an (MRQE), Engine Query Review Movie the on relied Hughey Reception.” Reviewers’ and Film Savior White “The article: his in Hughey W. Matthew bo data the national publicationswere not,simply goes unstated. publications. nine include to film German 2004 the of reception American the on article Bathrick’s David example, For unsatisfying. approach Other 2000s. the from films war Russian on article Stars” “Guiding analysis whole the replicate to having without are, opinions and reactions such widespread or representative how just gauging for loss a at be

As of May 2015, the site was thewas22 the site AsMay2015, of Id Reception,” Reviewers’ Film and Savior White “The Hughey, MatthewW. ofDownfall,” Reception U.S. The It? Is “WhoseHi/story Bathrick, David ., ., 482. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/kinopoisk.ru Since the MRQE does not include Russian language reviews, the thesis turned to the to turned thesis the reviews, language Russian include not does MRQE the Since exactly detailing by shortcomings such overcome and avoid to aims thesis This

composite of the major English major the of composite in

– the Russian Federat Russian the y a lctd n cntand I de s b tkn a apoc smlr t similar approach an taking by so does It constrained. and located was dy 142 16. 16. Downfall

KinoP

– KinoP

96. film subpages, which include p include which subpages, film

ik nlds h lts nw on news latest the includes oisk

focuses only on reviews from the “elite press,” indicated by footnote by indicated press,” “elite the from reviews on only focuses ikr, hc cud et e ecie t a etr adec as audience Western a to described be best could which oisk.ru,

139

ion according to web traffic analysis traffic web to according ion Why exactly only these nine these only exactly Why nd

Freedom Writers Freedom most visited page in the Russian Federation, a few ranks below fewa ranks Federation, Russian the mostin visited page - language film websites IMDb and IMDb websites film language ssian web users, ranking among the most visited visited most the among ranking users, web ssian .

. Hughey’s MRQE search resulted in resulted search MRQE Hughey’s . roduct —

hs s h cs wt Sehn Norris’ Stephen with case the is this oetc n itrainl films international and domestic ion information, box information, ion 141 were selected, while other major other while selected, were

New German Critique German New Symbolic Interacti Symbolic

from Alexa, a subsidiary subsidiary a Alexa, from Alexa

, accessed May1 accessed , Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten - es were just as just were es office figu office on

33, no. no. 3 33, 34, no. 102 102 no. 34,

how 0, 0, 131 131 as , res 140 o a ,

CEU eTD Collection include not actually did sites ofthese Several ajvideo.ru. (12) and kinouho.livejournal.com; (11) releasesoon.ru; kino womankino.ru; (6) (5) 144 143 crosscheck Russian additional categor the to and Federation reli again thesis the such identify to order In KinoPoisk. from content in substantially differ not did reviews thesis remained inaccessible. Vremya Novoye coding eventual for printed and accessible were 58 KinoPoisk, on reviews distinguish reviews 59 these publication negative 23 and positive deemed review thereview’scases source page orinsome to highlight short a provides and date, publishing and author publication, the indicates blurb Each negative. or positive is review Tomatoes Rotten of reminiscent Gazeta.ru) (Lenta.ru, newspapers online major Stone magazines including sources, media Russian various from reviews online of list and

12 Russian sites were identified this way: (1) megacritic.ru; (2) Bucwar.ru; (3) kinotom.com; (4) yaokino.ru; (4) kinotom.com; Bucwar.ru;(2) (3) megacritic.ru; way:this (1) wereidentified Russian sites 12 (2013),” “Kritika/Stalingrad a film rating set as a percentage out of 100. This rating This 100. of out percentage a as set rating film a , GQ ogt to sought Though Staling

and , author, and publishing date publishing and author, , 144 n smlf te icsin f h rsls n olwn chapters following in results the of discussion the simplify and

rad However, only one of these sites, M sites, these of one only However, Variety

hs rves r reviews these

was set behind a paywall, and despite purchasing a subscription, the article the subscription, a purchasing despite and paywall, a behind set was ’s KinoPoisk KinoPoisk ’s ofr wehr other whether confirm was was d pn lx wb rfi dt. n iiig h rsls t results the limiting In data. traffic web Alexa upon ed websites - ), major Russian Russian major ), interior.ru; (7) vkadrenet.ru; (8) kioobzor.net; (9) media (9) kioobzor.net; vkadrenet.ru; (8) (7) interior.ru;

assig

KinoPoisk e a ietfe (.. Rve 1, eiw 48 Review 17, Review (e.g., identifier an ned

eoe t film to devoted rating came to 61%, based on 59 reviews 59 on based 61%, to came rating peet sbtnil aa body data substantial a epresent , with a green or red background box box background red or green a with , y .

143 Iskusstvo , accessed May 6, 2015, 2015, May6, accessed ,

A table listing table A r ut fo te piece the from quote or newspapers , is , usa f Russian

provide 44 Kino . A blurb for each review is provi is review each for blurb A .

were identified identified were / egacritic.ru .

( d as Appendix A to this to A Appendix as d these 59 reviews, 59 these ilm

Obzory Vedomosti http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/468196/press/ eiw ests ht opl film compile that websites review

is generated based on a compiled a on based generated is

[Art/ , utilized a r a utilized , , along Iz

themselves of and in vestiya Film/ o ue n a in use for

- news.ru; (10) news.ru; to indicate to ih ln t te full the to link a with with

, , 36 of which were which of 36 , — ating score system score ating Reviews Kommersant the Revi

thesis. Each thesis. . te Russian the o ) in order to to order in ) review’s title, review’s ded in a style style a in ded

(like f hs 59 these Of

whether the the whether ew 39 from 39 ew

, several ], potential Rolling ), and ),

sites, the ,

of .

CEU eTD Collection 2012). Publications, SAGE 146 145 http://www.alexa.com/topsites/category/Top/World/Russian/ Obzory > Kino > Iskusstvo > Russian > World > All Categories Sites in: Category “Top down. apparentlytaken had been or filmreviews, actual Analysis step by supplemented discourses around particular film. this racial contesting and reproducing theoretically were that points reference cultural represented priori.” a understand “readers assumed, identified reviewer he codes themes, the overarching constructing how in another categorized one Hughey complemented process, coding the of stage third sec pre been had which of many read first a reviews: film collected a implemented Hughey Hughey’s on relied again thesis this framework, a such constructing In conceptualized. be to needed framework analytic an all, at if figure, Nazi the of depiction Analysis Thematic 74 of which by were accessible author. the reviews, total 75 to amounted therefore body data final The listing. KinoPoisk the as format cross Nonetheless Megacritic.ru’s on used aggregate an on based

Greg Guest, Kathleen M. Kathleen Guest, Greg 484. Hughey, ondary literature; and a second in order to mark those codes directly in the text. During the During text. directly thosecodes the tomark a inthe inorder second ondary and literature; - hc me check poes iia t Hge’ i ad is Hughey’s to similar process A how understand to order In . 146

, an additional 16 additional an , Furthermore, the themes Furthermore,the

thod A .

- of compiled third compiled of

MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey, Namey, E. Emily and MacQueen, by three stage coding process, process, coding stage three al o tee 16 these of table

tp ntutos rm h rsac manual research the from instructions step Stalingrad - selected for confirmation based on language and topics from his from topics and language on based confirmation for selected

film reviews were were reviews film ,” ,” Alexa - hog i odr o dniy n rfn ptnil codes, potential refine and identify to order in through and meta and , accessed May 5, 2015, 2015, May5, accessed ,

hs fl rves ee icsig Bondarchuk’s discussing were reviews film these ae ee ulctv o te KinoP the of duplicative were page - party reviews like KinoPoisk. Many of the reviews the of Many KinoPoisk. like reviews party

eiw i provided is reviews 45 - themes themes

opted here, though the methodology was was methodology the though here, opted

Искусство incorporated in incorporated Applied Thematic Analysis Thematic Applied involving two read two involving 145 here will be based on the discussion of discussion the on based be will here

For Hughey, these these Hughey, For / Кино s pedx B Appendix as / to the data body usin body data the to Обзоры meta Freedom Writers Freedom - . - throughs of his 119 119 his of throughs themes

ple Thematic Applied (Thousand Oaks, CA: Oaks, (Thousand

ik results. oisk meta which , in h same the -

themes article. article. g this this g the the

CEU eTD Collection grouped then were codes These codes. specific represented that numbers with marked and also R interacting. were codes the how of readout visual a facilitate to text actual online c these in discussion the example, for Does, right. own their in analyzed be could therefore and film, the over discourse the in involvement and texts these with interaction readers’ represent review title; Kahn, review’s the Peter in character Nazi the to references the including surrounding discourse overall the establishing in useful be could patterns, and solely not was existence toconfirming ofjustthese oriented theeightcodes. andcodes potential discernable all discoveringat aimed thesis the However, issue. white’and (8 and narrative; war the humanityto adds Nazi Bondarchuk’s (7) screen; (6 article; Stars” “Guiding his in Norris Stephen by discussed films in Nazi’ ‘good the of depiction to made references (5) veterans; of memory the disgraces Nazi Bondarchuk’s (4) Hollywoodesque; is Nazi Bondarchuk’s (3) Nazism; glorifies Nazi Bondarchuk’s (2) films; Soviet ‘great’ like Ch in discussion pre been already had codes potential of number A book.’ ‘code a in down written and identified werecodes potential and read first a conducting relationand thememories narratives to of discourse the how and figure Nazi the taken directly directly taken , if any; any; if , After this fi this After read first the Moreover, and reviews the of printing and gathering the involved analysis the of step first The omments mirrorthe same codes foundinthereviews? and whether or or whether and ) apter 2 apter declaration of a need to explore the dark or shady elements of the war on war the of elements shady or dark the explore to need a of declaration from each article and placed into into placed and article each from rst reading, a second reading was initiated initiated was reading second a reading, rst - through of the of through . Potential codes included: (1) claims that Bondarchuk’s movie is not is movie Bondarchuk’s that claims (1) included: codes Potential . - omltd n cud e hce fr n h tx based text the in for checked be could and formulated - through also aimed t aimed also through not the article the not entire data set. During this read this During set. data entire surrounding that figure is being discussed, likely in likely discussed, being is figure that surrounding

the war overviewed the war 2 inChapter 46

allowed for comments. These comments can comments These comments. for allowed

the ‘codebook,’ with the text highlighted text the with ‘codebook,’ the o identify other potential indicators that indicators potential other identify o h ye o itrs sdi the in used pictures of types the

in order to order in - through initial patterns patterns initial through ) war is not a ‘black a not waris )

. mark codes in the in codes mark

elevant text was text elevant n the on

CEU eTD Collection chapter. f disce into igure amongst film critics. The results of the analysis are discussed in the subsequent subsequent the in discussed are analysis the of results The critics. film amongst igure

rnable themes, which revealed several underlying anxieties anxieties underlying several revealed which themes, rnable 47

in discussing the Nazi Nazi the discussing in CEU eTD Collection oe neetn ta “u by” Cds “oe yptei portrayal”; sympathetic “more good”; is Germans “Killing [Codes: theme Die” [Codes: must Nazis “All the labelled colloquially boys” “our “romantic/Shakespearian than interesting more “ son”; and father S to references different a for “made (3) state”; foreigners”] for “made patriotism”; the instill to “made Oscars”; please the for “made generation”; to “made [Codes: made was movie the why mo Russian for foil sexuality girls”; our “German raped “Germans years”; 50 in rape wartime of discussion “First motif”; girls followin the included which themes, into grouped be could codes these of most reading, second the During codebook. Identified Themes and Codes warRussia’s narrative. three least at the of a revealed process coding only claims Such screen.” on war the of image the of history the in point turning “a insinuated, that underscoring were critics many that established clearly themes and codes These codes. these from discernable Chapter 5: Analysis shore up the choice of Stalingrad as an memory event worth studying worth event memory an as Stalingrad of choice the up shore discussion of that figurethat of was discussion uig h frt edn o te aa oy 4 iiil oe wr witn no the into written were codes initial 40 body, data the of reading first the During themes major the and process coding the of results the discusses first chapter This - usa Hlyod Romance”; Hollywood Russian meta ve drco Sre Bnacu, ydrs ahr Cds “oprsn of “comparison [Codes: father Fyodor’s Bondarchuk, Sergei director oviet - They Fought for the Motherland the for Fought They themes at play in the critics’ discourse over discourse critics’ the in play at themes

Nazi”; “Germans are exotic”]; (5) opposition to any ‘good Nazis,’ Nazis,’ ‘good any to opposition (5) exotic”]; are “Germans Nazi”; data body rich in references to the Nazi figure, though the though figure, Nazi the to references in rich body data Stalingrad g: (1) the relationship between Kahn and Masha [Codes: “Two [Codes: Masha and Kahn between relationship the (1) g: rals”; “love story aspect disappointing”]; (2) attempts to explain to attempts (2) disappointing”]; aspect story “love rals”;

not

a a “game a was particularly verbose. However, the analysis uncovered the However, particularlyverbose.

Msa oe te ai; “victim Nazi”; the loved “Masha 48

”; “ ”; - hnig eet o, s eiw 26 Review as or, event, changing” They Fought for Katya for Fought They

the Nazi figure Nazi the . Beyond this, the the this, Beyond .

”]; (4) German German (4) ”]; and change and ; “German ”; majority s to s CEU eTD Collection 147 like film, the trashed that reviews those even And did.” he that and cinema, Russian of t Bondarchukwanted “Fyodor asserts, 41 Review Russia;” while before;” known never has cinema our promotion, in massive a “Such declares, 34 Review shot ever expensive most the is film “the claims, 58 Review unprecedented: screens. 2,000 some at on opened had and USD million 30 of budget a had film the that highlight reviews of number a Moreover, format. that of use film’s the the of all foremost, and First subject. research worthwhile a as reception Stalingrad of the Great War inRussia Patriotic 2000s, the of films the to can Soviet the with comparisons to, limited not was but include, indeed did figure Nazi of discussion the that show clearly above outlined themes the and codes these “ Post other to references (11) and movie?”]; cult”; war era Brezhnev “di the [“referencing film Soviet Western to comparisons to (10) “comparisons directors”]; films”; American to “comparisons influence”; [“Hollywood of [“trivialization hi portrayal of inappropriateness (8) war”]; the into humanity “inserting humanism”; Western to “reference [Codes: humanism of values Western of introduction o box “record about facts and claims (6) Nazism”]; of “glorification White Tiger White story”; “strangeness”; “liberal influence”; “too soon”]; (9) references to Hollywood Hollywood to references (9) soon”]; “too influence”; “liberal “strangeness”; story”;

Reviews 8, 15, 27, 34, 40, 41, 50, 74. 74. 41, 40, 34, 50, 27, 15, 8, Reviews frn ta Sve cnn; Sve Nzs ee ifrn” “o e ed hs id of kind this need we “do different”; were Nazis “Soviet canon”; Soviet than fferent This body of film reviews added considerable support to choosing to support considerable added reviews film of body This ”; “Aleksey German and German “Aleksey ”; ffice”; “turning ffice”;

as “Gameas IMAX, with nearly all explicitly stating it was Russia’s first production in production first Russia’s was it stating explicitly all nearly with IMAX,

as was expected from the literature the from expected was as - -

point”; “mega point”; Changer”

The Last Train Last The

- blockbuster”; “unprecedented controversy”]; (7) controversy”]; “unprecedented blockbuster”; 49 - oit im [oe: “ [Codes: films Soviet

o direct the most massive film in the historythe in film massive most the directo 147 ”; “Post ”;

T hese Stalingrad -

id of kinds Soviet film canon”]. Theref canon”]. film Soviet on t on he nearly 70 years of a cult a of years 70 nearly he s infcne [Codes: significance ’s un b te Sun the by Burnt ubr wr simply were numbers

reviews Stalingrad Stalingrad referenced referenced

and its and on or or on

ore, ore, 2 ’s ”; CEU eTD Collection 149 148 Natal’ Author nomination.” ‘Oscar’ its recall to and globally ‘Stalingrad’ filmthe of distribution the of ban the demanding are they which in Culture, of Ministrythe to positi Citadel film industry domestic the in event significant very a as film this positions bad or good is picture buffs.” Sheyderov David “Incidentally, Critic continued, v this movie Russian of community entire the excite to continue it about disputes the but weeks, down quieting not are Bondarchuk, Fyodor of review it choking delig from reaction stormy a such to rise gives which cinema, our from emerged film Film encouragesreaders andGermans” tosee [ “Certainly necessarythen itis saying.” are what tounderstand people nation of history the in mega milestone next the is this Stalingrad, film the “However, declared: 8, Review

a ntcal mr lkl ta te otoes apc wud e raised. be would aspect controversy the that likely more noticeably was Review 1. Review1. 7. 5, 6, 4, 1, Reviews ht to vigorous protest.” In those reviews published nearly two weeks after the premiere, the after weeks two nearly published reviews those In protest.” vigorous to ht ons. Review 4 begins, “Almost 18 thousand people signed an online petition, addressed petition, online an signed people thousand 18 “Almost begins, 4 Review ons. ) were over thishotly. notdeliberated eiw 4 n 6 o vn ate i dsusn ti ptto b atal saig out staking actually by petition this discussing in farther even go 6 and 4 Reviews For the things of viewers expected were Samara them be. notasthey to due tothe factexhibition, and ‘positive that its afflicted hero Kahn.’ istheGerman Samarapassedeven where a they demanding petition, thebanning of Thegenerally nemesis Kahnresponse a drew city publically, particularly inthe of hot,indeed, createdSo thatit an online petition: once And –

Stalingrad vn iia ihlo’ sadlu sqes to sequels scandalous Mikhalkov’s Nikita even

Stalingrad Stalingrad

] has garnered praises or curses,” while Review 35, titled “Stalingrad: titled 35, Review while curses,” or praises garnered has ] claimed,

hit theaters, people seemed to be saying a lot. Review 51 notes: 51 Review lot. a saying be to seemed people theaters, hit

Dsusos n h rcnl rlae fl ‘Stal film released recently the on “Discussions al cinema and the next candidate for the Oscar. In general In Oscar. the for candidate next the and cinema al – ”

50 the film has been in theaters for more than two two than more for theaters in been has film the Stalingrad

: “Only so often in recent years recenta : “Only has often in so

un B te Sun the By Burnt ery controversyery whether this of Stalingrad 148 - 149 ya Afanas’eva Afanas’eva ya blockbuster, a a blockbuster,

(

Exodus Pravda.ru’s ingrad,’ of of ingrad,’

from

and and - CEU eTD Collection 150 development positive or interesting an actually is figure this 4, Review like critics, some For Kahn ofPeter Discussion Critics’ bet history, Motherland’s the grandfathers,the soulsofourcrippleI children. and ontheRunet.” petition signed the of out sacrifice a “made have, producers the and Bondarchuk that stating by review his concludes He mythology. national Russia’s destroying the of part the on stunt PR calculated potentially a as petition this sees first author the while But significant thefilm is to opposition other from reviews negative rather of number a cites I faith.“good this And, patrioticFritz” filmthis.”fear, can could no shake fix no and soldiers, Soviet of deeds the and Victory Great the in confident were people Soviet he concludes She reaction.” pained very a society in causes War Patriotic Great the narrative: of events Soviet the about thetalk to today outside attempt any war “absolutely the revisit to unwilling are who public, and audience lame Afanas’eva Instead, guilty.” not is Bondarchuk Fyodor “But film, the defends Afanas’eva But Nazism.’” of glorification blatant a as ‘appears film the that is petition, the signed who viewers, disgruntled of complaint main “The continues,

Review6. rdcr, e hn rus a i dsusd n rae dti blw that below, detail greater in discussed is as argues, then he producers, Review 4 and 6 therefore draw the battle lines of the discussion over the ‘good Nazi.’ ‘good the over discussion the of lines battle the draw therefore 6 and 4 Review Stalingrad fuddy outdated as critics p the channel to order in producers, picture’s the of stunt th PR conceived cunningly a is this that inconceivable not is It for award. film Oscar the for funding state bid film’s of the off call to abroad, and Federation Russian the in film the allocation of distribution the considered boards, and life their considered and Stalingrad», film the fund to decided who individuals the liable hold «to demands: the with Culture of Ministry Kondrash Alexandr by written 6, Review

signatur of collection the began there Runet the On ’s chancesa ofbecoming nominee.

- duddies […] and international scandal only increases increases only scandal international and […] duddies also beinggenerated online: 51

ov, takes a rather different line. Kondrashov Kondrashov line. different rather a takes ov, r review on a rather somber note: “But the “But note: somber rather a on review r 150

‘major’ ‘major’ - long expulsion from commissions from expulsion long s the blame on the Russian Russian the on blame the s

rtc, n te cam that claims then and critics, rotest and expose the film’s the expose and rotest s ne a etr o the to letter a under es e film; to ban the the ban to film; e

Stalingrad

ray our our ray

is CEU eTD Collection soldiers. Nazi other Kahn or Peter whichwereofof 10 webpage, film’s Stalingrad the from stills production of22 gallerya included Review60 the of wasstill production the 47 and 22 inReview both used image only The cases. some prominently in featured werestill Kahn ofPeter pictures 151 6); (Review scum” “fascist 67); (Review adversary” noble “a 5); (Review loves” and rejoices grieves, passionate, is who personality, vivid completely a as viewers the to “depicted 45); (Review tantam the “not 56): 51, (Review tragic 50); (Review “antihero 25); (Review valiant fascination Kahn of descriptions short include reviews Nazi’ ‘good the Stalingrad scree featured still reviews nine those of three said, That film. the in characters through am anxieties certain revealing process the in and figure this over head to coming is War Patriotic Great the over meta these of discussion The interference. how on another and war the on take the of found cha perceived the and figure Nazi the of discussion the how on is here emphasis the Rather, Nazi.’ ‘good the against or for is review a whether simply on not is below focus the But nation. Russian the of sacrifice wartime the and war Post in

Reviews 20, 22, 24, 47, 53, 60, 62, 68, and 74 made no reference in the Nazi figure in their text. However, text.However, in their figure Nazi in the made reference no 74 and 68, 62, 60, 53, 47, 24, 22, 20, Reviews ational myth is being presented and framed. and presented being is myth ational reviews - Of Soviet war films, while for others, like Review 6, it is an insul an is it 6, Review like others, for while films, war Soviet Stalingrad ’s Nazis quite prominently. quite Nazis ’s : intelligent (Review 58); “a fascist James Bond” (Review 4); brave (Review 23); (Review brave 4); (Review Bond” James fascist “a 58); (Review intelligent : the fsit nae” (Revi invader” “fascist

considered here suggested at least two least at suggested here considered 4 accessible 74

n h rem the in .

ong Russian film critics with the state of Russia’s war cult as presented as cult war Russia’s of state the with critics film Russian ong

iig 5 eiw vre widely varies reviews 65 aining

eiw, ny ie ae o eta rfrne o h Nazi the to reference textual no made nine only reviews, - mortally wounded Peter Kahn and Captain Gromov glaring at one another. another. oneglaring at CaptainGromov Kahn and Peter wounded mortally fascist” (Review 35); “a romantic hero, a European knight” knight” European a hero, romantic “a 35); (Review fascist”

w 66); ew 151 the ‘good Nazi’ is Nazi’ ‘good the

But - themes below presents how the clash of memory memory of clash the how presents below themes

52 the actual length and depth of the discussion of discussion the of depth and length actual the

bte ta ohr rte, u sil Fritz” a still but Fritzes, other than “better

that that

The ount evil ount nge the ‘good Nazi’ Nazi’ ‘good the nge signaled

meta kinds of responses of kinds the work of work the - themes, one of a need for a fresh a for need a of one themes, Overall, .

- doer, but not the good German good the not but doer, varying

t to the memory of the the of memory the to t foreign influence and and influence foreign h majority the levels of disgust disgust of levels expressed in expressed brings

to Russia’s Russia’s to sos of nshots

f these of some or

CEU eTD Collection 153 152 claim comes ather abruptly rather the end piece of mythology. war Russia’s a represented s Yet pantheon. glorious this of short fell question in review the that meant usually which canon, A New Myth wartime rape also was Masha apparent dilute generation, War Patriotic meta could did that those figure. same “one withah as 16); (Review hero” a as practically dies and film the of minutes final the until up lives “he (Reviewa Fritz” “generallyextraordinary” 14); complex and and “psychopathic (Review 11);

Review 32. Review32. Reviews - themes: (1) that the ‘good Nazi’ represents a new development in the myth of the Great the of myth the in development new a represents Nazi’ ‘good the that (1) themes:

vrl reviews everal h mt o te ra Ptitc a. e dsuso ws not was discussion Yet War. Patriotic Great the of myth the by thestate. Ionly this, believe,can considered a be breakthrough inRussian HeRussians. ideals eventhatbothhold of suggests military And and virtue. honor thejunglenot dive into ideology intobadGermans and dividethe of good soldiers or Andhere isworthgiving[…] it credit proper tothe director, maj the of One drawing were critics film Russian then Clearly binary. A third meta third A binary. 31, 32, 49. 49. 32, 31, and (2) that this figure represents the product of foreign of product the represents figure this that (2) and

uman face” (Reviewaout waruman face” 9);and“burntdog” 61). (Review And while not every review discussed the ‘good Nazi’ Nazi’ ‘good the discussed review every not while And and collaboration and

oiie breakthrough positive eesr fr eiaiig h mmr o Rsin arfc for sacrifice Russian of memory the revitalizing for necessary eetd which detected, 153

e considered be

or codes themes identified i identified themes codes or use

152 d

In the case of Maria Tokmashev’s review Tokmashev’s Maria of case Inthe this same code to do the opposite, arguing that that arguing opposite, the do to code same this

- . theme based around the relationship between Peter Kahn and Kahn Peter between relationship the around based theme

asd int raised de o h cds involved, codes the to due , r unn pit in point turning or rsig lis bu ti fl’ dpcin of depiction film’s this about claims eresting 53

: 15 n

reviews was referencing to the Soviet Soviet the to referencing was reviews drastically different drastically the eeomn of development o represent to

Bondarchuk,who interests and interests for in war cinema, fundedwarcinema, - only depth RIA Novosti RIA

ecin t the to reactions iie t this to limited

, two opposing opposing two a number of of number a

Post values that values Stalingrad , sucha , - did a Soviet

new new

CEU eTD Collection 155 154 Nazi,’ which interpretation ofthe war Stalingrad World reimaging ofthe war: of films war previous what explaining in repeated is line same That film “The mytho Nazi’ ‘good the how discussing in farthest in motif Nazi’ ‘good the cult that impression the then, review this in least At

Id R , but , eview 49. eview49. .

logy needs t that

War andWar masters mission. this less than between the soldiers of the forties and viewers of the 2010s. This is not a not is This 2010s. the generationalan anthropological but one. barrier, of viewers and forties the of soldiers the between than less the between but horrible, sounds It other. each from they than time that from those from we war, the on take epic truly a produce to order in on: goes myth Stalingrad epic film the degenerate: ( to began the to 70s film war Stagnation ofofficiale pinnacle “Liberation” thetriumphand already was During us. opposed humane more kinder, were we because won we relaxed: were policies Marxist Thaw were the During we Stalinists. general in and party, ruling our by declared was victory 49 Review «In August 44» was specifically seen as seen specifically was howev , « warring German warring Stalingrad

for

A last “At I Sve fl tee ee aiu tetet o te a: ni te Thaw, the until war: the of treatments various were there film Soviet n Bykov

90s lost the main thing main the lost 90s Bykov, Dmitry by written , ak ti bek rm the from break this marks r rpeet a ra wt te oit period Soviet the with break a represents er,

the ‘good Nazi’ Nazi’ ‘good the mr me more , “Bondarchuk’s film opens a new era in conceptualization of theSecond new film opensera a “Bondarchuk’s inconceptualization » o be embracedo

) or to shock theviewer with egregious( ortoshock cruelty) — represents t s osbe o omlt te e eeet udr hc the which under element, key the formulate to possible is it pn a e ea n h understand the in era new a opens

Reviews 3 Reviews metaphysica s

although without any further elaboration, further any without although and Russian and

cfl w wr i te is pae epe ad h inhuman the and people, place first the in were we rciful; an element supported by the state. While the While state. the by supported element an a needed 1 ” .

not only added to the positive development of the war the of development positive the to added only not

and 49 and

Bykov l: apparently a gap apparentlyl: a50 of

s –

deadlocked around Stalingrad around deadlocked the point: point: the dose of humanity.Bykovdose

54 does then then suggests this meta this suggests

oit continuum Soviet

iue ersns h frain f new a of formation the represents figure

recalls not invoke state support, they support, state invoke not it 155 continued to exploit critical subjects critical exploit to continued the Soviet canon

ing -

60 - f h Scn Wrd War.” World Second the of theme from its its from theme

years necessary.” is by “ : the 2010 lacked 2010 the

se […] “War film of thefilm of “War […] se

continues: continues: introducing

«Come See» and the Now begins a new new a begins Now : the difference was was difference the

author

must must discussion of discussion very

arguably go arguably differ more more differ

was under under was h ‘good the - Leninist — subtitle:

[new] a true true a ). 154

CEU eTD Collection 157 156 film: mythology. Tsyrkun “Nina Nazi h that canon a purpose. into life new breath to needed one myth, war the on take new a promotes successful film the dichotomy, evil and good and politics obvious its of war the the frivolous a being necessary.” is but difficult, be will this to Taking Mars. war the because empha Bykov terms motif: of the‘good Nazi’ Trojan the invokes Bykov

Review 31. Review31. Id my . ’

as th of the Great Patriotic War. By returning the role of hero to the people and stripping stripping and people the to hero of role the returning By War. Patriotic Great the of th midst of the war became the pinnacle, imbued with evangelical motives of martyrdom martyrdom of motives evangelical with imbued pinnacle, the became war the of midst Donskoy’s Mark time. a for it preserved film war and 1930s, Tsyrkun Nina burn Russian the finaleseizedindeath’s together,and embra theGerman in adversaries; formidable and equal rather but monsters, caricatured not are Germans this about what won,but why‘we’ about this Bondarchuk didn’tfilm were notvictorious. w assign to Skoybedy like propagandists today’s of attempts the counters He better.” are “we that not is theme main the but conciliation, isn’t there film Bondarchuk’s In dead. the when is “Troy” of scene Achil best the but right, were Achaeans the that understand, we […]

the film is not abou not is film the – a turning point in the war myth. myth. war the in point turning a

on and we will establish order,’ establish will we and on

this film is about how about is film this

” battle made of people; about how about people; of made battle

epol nesadtedfeec ewe caasadToas although Trojans, and Achaeans between difference the understand poorly We 157 les and the old man Priam weep together, mourning Hector, Patroclus, and all and Patroclus, Hector, mourning together, weep Priam man old the and les victory tot ie that: sizes oit im eeoe a eakbe yhlgcl rdto wy ak n the in back way tradition mythological remarkable a developed film Soviet

sru luce it a icsin f h mtooia apcs f Soviet of aspects mythological the of discussion a into launches Tsyrkun ak aot hs im wih s aig th laying is which film, this about talks story element story ’s review for review ’s

he grandfathers; he Tee s o utfcto o Nzs o aooy o Stalinism for apology or Nazism of justification no is “There t fascism or about Stalinism.” Rather this is, “ is, this Rather Stalinism.” about or fascism t War

n xliig ht odrhk a dn wt hs im in film his with done has Bondarchuk what explaining in functions Achilles

Isskusstvo Kino Isskusstvo

Invoking the Oscar race, the article’s the race, Oscar the Invoking which which after nearly 70 yearsafter nearlyVictory 70 after

and Hector head to head talked with Athena an Athena with talked head to head Hector and for Bykov here as a symbol that will rehabilitate will that symbol a as here Bykov for 55

great pressure gives rise to the to rise gives pressure great

looks like unwarrantable back unwarrantable like looks

echoes Bykov’s discussion of the of discussion Bykov’s echoes

T he ‘good Nazi’ ‘good he e beginning of a new war war new a of beginning e Rai A new movie about about movie new A nbow

motif, rather than rather motif, the squeal is ‘ the squealis superman. The The superman. - lead slapping. You You slapping.

ce. filmed in the in filmed - ad lost its its lost ad 156 in

claims, ‘ good We d , CEU eTD Collection 160 159 158 before period revitalize mythology, notworked isalreadywhich out,but isstill developing.” end war’s after passed have decades many so that now only new “This concludes, author the As enemies. Russian his like just revenge for desire a rage, a into him drives death Masha’s And on living is “He warrior: a just than more is Kahn But includes twoprominentNazis, one givenrole:a human contemporarycinema glance, first At

Id Id Id . . .

Therefore, both both Therefore, appear as tohim barb voice to to falls it who he evidently officer career almostkinosbornikov figure a colonel, out, points author the as actually, But thi nationalitie various of ones young no are there squad the in that curious (its humanity of elements all of deprived is who enemy, the confronting of corethe the Accordingly ethnicities). various sure, be to of, (composed nation the of characters superiority given the as unconditionallyof thought is patriotism and “patriotic,” of synonym under remain end, to myth a like guardian the by replaced LarisaShepit’ko’s was splash was last mythologism Eventually […] of fulfillment Calvary to ascending of and

s type ofproject the war cult for today. for cult war the myth becomes the image of the soldier the of image the becomes myth Stalingrad Nevertheless, in the film are two Germans, who have faces. One of them is a is them of One faces. have who Germans, two are film the in Nevertheless, looks officially project,” national “big a as up set film, Bondarchuk’s Fyodor , considering himself as Alexander the Great, calling soldiers to India. to soldiers calling Great, the Alexander as himself considering , (« Stalingrad - In the Fog In the epic narrative, the heroes of which, as it pertains to them, from beginning from them, to pertains it as which, of heroes the narrative, epic -

Pruss an anysort of mythological thevein aspectin of [wartime short films]. A lotus eater and eater lotus A films]. short [wartime R

, as defined by defined as , eviews ideological government order. The tradition dissipated, faded, the the faded, dissipated, tradition The order. government ideological — a Ptr an rm “nobility,” from Kahn Peter ian

all entirely Russkies. arians, whowage revenge.arians, for war »). does not appear to be the likely successor successor likely the be to appear not does

158 31 and 49 promote the ‘good Nazi’ as the the as Nazi’ ‘good the promote 49 and 31

Both

crctr dm na i te prt f the of spirit the in near damn caricature a h cneta dmnn ie o te im Te Russians The film. the of idea dominant conceptual the

take on the bloody events, of co of events, bloody the on take

reviews suggest that the war cult in the Post the in cult war the that suggest reviews Burnt by the Sun 2 Sun the by Burnt «TheAscent» 56 Stalingrad

- 159 signs. signs. - savior

, and today only Sergei Loznitsa is its is Loznitsa Sergei only today and , screen in psychological withdrawal.” withdrawal.” psychological in screen

u “ainl tdy ons s a as sounds today “national” But -

deliverer without fear or reproach, reproach, or fear without deliverer is

are o a eivl ideology medieval a of carrier ; or surprisingly this is the beginning of a new new a of beginning the is this 160 a the

beast beast

s, as would be expected in expected be would as s, Rainbow patriotic war films films war patriotic

urse, became possible possible became urse, […] The second is a is second The […] different, in that it that in different, needed : n r in

eturning element boyevyk - Soviet genre It is It to to to ,

CEU eTD Collection 162 discussion.” separate th of death ultimate the ascertain in Post depictions “universal” have to such soon too that it is 35, ofReview the case in Nazi,’ and ‘good ofthe thepresentation 161 which House, Pavlov’s Surrendered an Oscar Western foreign, a of introduction creation. and figure are reviews only the not are they though weekly business the History Our and story. sacrifice war’s the remember must who audience, the to closer potentially and human more new pumps Nazi’ ‘good the of aspect new this wants author neither But too. away fade can war of the thememory that tobe wouldappear underlyinga issues the message, lacks point” or “a generally,

Review 6. Review6. inappropriateness an suggest reviews 66. and 40, These 36, in 35, Reviews expressed is Similarsentiment end of Russia’s hold on its foundational myth. myth. foundational its on hold Russia’s of end

Kondrashov man Priam together wee them, beat who which in war, the about important» longer no is correctness ideological myth new a creating for conceptually […] Kondrashov Aleksandr myth new this saw critics other But — In these reviews these In

ad grownad ae h saks cam aot h Nz figure Nazi the about claims starkest the make among process undermining the Dmitriy - Soviet film. Review 29 concludes: “With the release of “Stalingrad” it is necessary to to necessary it is “Stalingrad” of the “Withrelease concludes: Review 29 film. Soviet

for an Oscar? an for magazine magazine

invokes invokes the most most the

stale. stale. yo, n o te is (n, t em, last seems, it (and, first the of one Bykov, are t are

the e Soviet tradition of war film. Why and how it came to pass is the subject for a for subject ispass the to it came how Why and war film. of Soviettradition e This is important. If the memory of the war can become banal andbecomebanal can war the important.Ifmemoryof the is This Odnako in introducing hisreview o be o descriptive ” is written as a kind of rebuttal of kind a as written is ”

inclusion of the of inclusion reviews p, mourning Hector, Patroclus ’s

regard element review, “Stalingrad Pizza, or How Bondarchuk Jr. Jr. Bondarchuk How or Pizza, “Stalingrad review, , are , sac

o xrs sc sentiment such express to ed as ed pieces in the e the in pieces the clearest examples clearest the red red not as the savior the as not into Russia’s historic victory in an attempt to win to attempt an in victory historic Russia’s into life into the war myth and helps to make the war the make to helps and myth war the into life memory of thememory war of 57

‘good Nazi’ motif in motif Nazi’ ‘good Trojans and and Trojans

: Reviews

, which is to say that say to is which ,

—

ntire instead, the implication is implication the instead,

, but as but , Achaeans data body data

». 6 and 8, both 8, and 6 of Bykov’s of being a Hollywood import or or import Hollywood a being

162 of this line of ar of line this of .

s a sign of the beginning the of sign a . Stalingrad 161 :

in discussing the Nazi the discussing in « to

Achilles and the old the and Achilles oee, hs two these However, , rie te film the praised ), piece «our historical or or historical «our fascists and those and fascists

published

is seen as the the as seen is (Review 49 (Review gumentation, that this that in the in

in in of of ),

CEU eTD Collection 164 163 B contracts.” signing the anticipating if as languor death film: the of about obsessed theenemy with Russian revenge are proved out. head the in shot be to her for only Masha, girl Russian the save to tries German this end, the in And the presentation of own.” their kill They cruel. wild, “stupid, arehere Russians The far. too German Post late the in released films infiltrate this Kondrashov, to According German film: “sullen of Even barbarians,Khan.” Genghis istheportrayal worse in asofRussians horsemen Sc for save absent, completely almost Wes in Russian the of representation the discusses then Kondrashov petition, the and film the surrounding controversy the discussing After ut Kondrashov continues,ut Kondrashov and thereal sets believesis what issue: up he

Id Id . .

The review The remorse.without “Wh the theme on reflect doesn’t he (granted, anguished loving, is he explain, actor, his as well as director His personality. complex a reveals “sisters,” raping father”, and “mothers Ge The captain. the but compassion, of worthy and propaganda Nazi OnthemAmericans? areall hope, they are savio by misguided tragic are Germans heroes, nurses. the rape and wounded [German] the off finish Russians - — Russian co Russian

hc t Knrso ses ahr esls: “ senseless: rather seems Kondrashov to which Heroism and wartime sacrifice in Bykov’s analogy becomes a kind of joke here. joke of kind a becomes analogy Bykov’s in sacrifice wartime and Heroism

“And the Homeric conclusion: Patroclus entwines with Hector in an ambrosial an in Hector with entwines Patroclus conclusion: Homeric the “And

apmn Kh (hms rtcmn) oss rae smah ta our than sympathy greater rouses Kretschmann) (Thomas Kahn Hauptmann Germa in how And the German the t m dig ee i Saiga, low a Stalingrad, in here, doing I am at - returns production) and in Mikhalkov’s Mikhalkov’s in and production) rman is truly macho (ours is lesser). The fascist bugger, who kills our kills who bugger, fascist The lesser). is (ours macho truly is rman 164

enemy ykov ipa o ‘od ai’ n ‘a Rsin’ a bgn to begun had Russians’ ‘bad and Nazis’ ‘good of display ny? In the landmark serial “Our Mothers and Fathers” the Fathers” and Mothers “Our serial landmark the In ny? ’s , Peter Kahn: Kahn: , Peter - Greek myth Greek Soviet period, with films like films with period, Soviet ide’ Ls, n hc Rsin odes per as appear soldiers Russian which in List, hindler’s 58 in a better tomorrow tomorrow better a in

tern film. In American film, the Russian is Russian the film, American In film. tern

analogy. Citadel rs. 163 . But with But . n te od of words the And

Kondrashov - life, executioner?) executioner?) life, ”

of 4 Days in May in Days 4 Stalingrad, it has gone gone has it Stalingrad,

Russian But equally as bad is bad asequally But

sums up the finale the up sums - h Germans the emn gas German He is also also is He

(A 2011 2011 (A CEU eTD Collection 166 165 of motif: inclusion the‘goodNazi’ cl is Dumagame officials kindofpatriotic was asthe needed that inthegaming Russian industry. Company countering at Russia New of chapter full a devotes actually Norris Stephen past. Russia’s for disrespect Bondarchuk’s as sees Puchkov what around focused has dislike This review. and known people 600,000 Hi “ 8: Review with piece scathing out ofOscarconsideration. stating Kondrashov before, noted as end, the Motherland the to made sacrifice the Kondrashov, to According

story.” a blogger is soldier, former and who translator found Puchkov Norris, Norris, Id . al nt fn of fan a not early

that what if the Germans attacked our country, killed 27 million of our countrymen? From countrymen? our of million 27 killed country, our attacked Germans the if what Germall liberal that thetoo. Thatthedream is of idiots he case, this in videogame a develop to inspired not apparently was Puchkov Though equally an penned “Goblin,” moniker the by goes also who Puchkov, Dmitriy television broadcasting, golden calf, Emmy. the the the take who gods, pagan worship they There shame.acknowledge anymore) authors Blockbuster History in the New Russia the in History Blockbuster . 166 , which costs Russia its faithfulness to its veterans and the souls of its children. its of souls the and veterans its to faithfulness its Russia costs which , well

he signed the petition the signed he to Puchkov’s production of a video game, video a of production Puchkov’s to

uho’ gm bcm a eaiey oet ucs ad a ee ctd by cited even was and success modest relatively a became game Puchkov’s

, Of course, in a progressive and modern film, the German occupiers are people people are occupiers German the film, modern and progressive a in course, Of Than

odrhks eso o te Soviet the of version Bondarchuk’s - who send us back to that time and time that to back us send who are subscribed to his to subscribed are documented displeasure of Bon of displeasure documented an s o mti Bykov; Dmitriy to ks understanding Stalingrad

Stalingrad

to ban the distribution o distribution the ban to

of good and evil. Conscience and sin. and Conscience evil. and good of ihr Oe set ht ohrd uho ms ws the was most Puchkov bothered that aspect One either.

felt this was was this felt YouTube page page YouTube , 143 ,

he Mreig n Seuaig n u Rset for Respect our on Speculating and Marketing : - 59 156; Norris, “Patriot Games,” 82 Games,” “Patriot Norris, 156; a through saw

darchuk and his films, saying as saying films, his and darchuk just just se Hollywoo se to alone - too much and much too country fhn a i hs 05 film 2005 his in War Afghan The Truth abo Truth The 165

f the film in Russia and to take it it take to and Russia in film the f . h Gek esg o te film’s the of message Greek the

Puchkov also maintains a well a maintains also Puchkov

ans be shown as people too. So too.So as people shown ans be

where there where d gods was the history of the the of history the was gods d Blockbuster History in the the in History Blockbuster concludes his review his concludes ut 9 ut success online - 93. 93. th Where they do not do they Where guise

is not yet not is Company

of the of

mu ch in his in ch , aimed , — (or not (or Oscar, over over

by 9 In th -

CEU eTD Collection 169 168 167 suggestion The prizes? and favor re and corrupted cult. war the for a foreignpurpose, Forbombshell. thistheywould atgive oncea ofOscars.” sack the to cellar the into and crept Gromov officer reconnaissance Hauptmann German the that Puchkov wish Academy. “I the claims: specifically sarcastically audience, international an to appealing of service tam this that implies Puchkov war? of thewarvision onRussia’s big screen. foreign a of importation the of end, the of beginning the simply is Nazi’ ‘good This Russia. as perceived generally countries those in shape taking war the of memory the with film Bondarchuk’s equates Puchkov patriotism, and heroism Russian promoting of Instead Indeed,abandonment goes memory. ofPuchkov the Soviet onto an thinking, in shift a reflects This figure. Nazi’ ‘good this with war the of memory alien an propagate producers, of army his and Bondarchuk like ‘liberals,’ Russian Puchkov, For

Id Id Review8. . .

Both Reviews 6 and 8 describe the “good Nazi” Nazi” “good the describe 8 and 6 Reviews Both the of memory a such promoting from gain Bondarchuk does What for? what But the in doing such. already are they as Vlasovites, and Balt to Nazis begin the will of they march after day the the applaud And decorations. and symbols Soviet outlaw they will tomorrow and films, feature in shit this with seams the at pull they Today […] youryouforget dead, with Eur familiar about own become You home. at dogs and kids mothers, and fathers left murderers the how aboutand muse genocide the about forget Let’s victim. the with murderer the and defender, the life for families, their for Motherland, the for fought who Russians the than worse not are Germans these end the in perspective, idiot’s the

ics and Ukraine. It is wonderful, that the state gives money for the shooting of shooting the for money gives state the that wonderful, is It Ukraine. and ics 168

s hs h sg o tig t come to things of sign the this Is

- imaged in the style and terminology of the West, in order to curry Western curry to order in West, the of terminology and style the in imaged

Oscar glory,Oscar

from

and inthe proces

they fervently loved each other each loved fervently they eig with pering

these two reviews, as well as Review as well as reviews, two these

— usa ntoa mtooy s l i the in all is mythology national Russian u hrtg and heritage our s suggestan as the corruption of the war narrative narrative war the of corruption the as . Let’s equate the aggressor with aggressor the equate Let’s . 169

anxiety the over trajectory of

say:

opean values. wartime —

now that would be a a be would that now s

sacrifice being being sacrifice 34, 167

35 and 65, and 35

against CEU eTD Collection “Stalingrad,” x/f 64: Fil Siniy 171 170 comments andtheblogosphereRussian wider delve could that here limitations space and qu a is this But denizens. Runet of number Puc that reach the Stalingrad of indication some provide of they kind some bots, not Internet and persons, real from are likes and views these of all that Assuming date. same the of as likes 35,356 and views 1,150,099 garnered YouTube on uploaded video VKontakte. on shares 326 and Facebook on shares 535 as well as views, review the of reco wasbody,Puchkov’s data the reviewsin other the of majority the Unlike popularity. and reach particular a had have to review, Puchkov’s humanism defenders. heroic the as footing same the on rapists Russian the Hollywood to sacrifice to forced being are Russians Nazi,’ ‘good adoptingthe the of inclusion Ch campaign Nazis! are characters that is

Siniy Fil 64: x/f “Stalingrad,” x/f 64: Fil Siniy Review65. anging the war narrative to conform conform to narrative war the anging this this uh anxiety Such inhumans] sympathy: be slightest the even me from evoke unifor Nazi everyone a who wears not does aristocrat German the […]

sacrifice :

destroyed ruthlessly and as soon as possible in order that these these that order in possible as soon as and ruthlessly destroyed has therefor ‘good Nazi’ ‘good a. n te so ta toe iw my ae tuk cod ih sizeable a with chord a struck have may views those that show they And had.

. As of May 30 May of As . ‘good Nazi ‘good

and are even notgiven tokill time one goodperson. the Indeed, R Indeed, Russian vr h taetr of trajectory the over e put Russia onthewrongput Russia etrack. representation is inappropriate is representation

Oper.ru Video, 2013, Video, Oper.ru

, YouTube Video, 2013, Video, YouTube ’ thus turns our attention away from what really matters: matters: really what from away attention our turns thus ’

, 2015 this video, hosted on oper.ru, had registered 1,380,641 registered had oper.ru, on hosted video, this 2015 , heroism eview 65 goes so far so goes 65 eview

for some for or play play or m and honestly fights for the vile ideology, needs to ideology,fights to needs them andhonestlyvile for in http://kino.oper.ru/video/view.php?t=582 estion for another project another for estion 61 . to the war cult cult war the

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLWlyANDov0

actual aud actual universalist to Western sensibilities, epitomized by the the by epitomized sensibilities, Western to rded and embedded below the text version text the embeddedbelow andrded This

as to use language straight from straight language use to as , at its most basic level, because these these because level, basic most its at ,

turn to turn ience commentary, either in either commentary, ience

per, t es i te ae of case the in least at appears, message that puts murderers and and murderers puts that message

universalism or Western or universalism 170 —

one without the t the without one kvs rtcs of criticism hkov’s nelyudi 171

. The very same very The

memory of memory [monsters,

the hate hate the ‘

us. online - like ime ’

; In CEU eTD Collection 173 172 only butalso for raped toliveharassment. her, made her in impossible without it complex Instead that claims 63 desire as described traitor fascists by raped were women that fact the about talking started finally we but development positive opin my in good,is and bad into people divide to difficultvery is it which in war, the of ambiguity theme film’s the that stated also she uniform, Nazi the wearing anyone for sympathy motif noted as which, during t story love simple outline ro the regarding theme particular of codes figure Nazi the between relationship sexual the concerning Loving the Invader: Victim or Traitor?

Reviews 2, 50, 63. 63. 50, 2, Reviews Review65. the ion, revealed as too as revealed ion,

. s to the Motherland, but rather unfortunate victims ofthe butrathers totheMotherland, victims war.” unfortunate regarding the regarding 74 total reviews. Again, as with the disc the with as Again, reviews. total 74 in

, Rev This boldest the Arguably meta dueling two these Beyond the film’s plot. plot. film’s the he warhe “Masha had no choice no had “Masha Stalingrad iew

claim that Masha was a victim was stated in other in stated was victim a was Masha that claim a “victim a . Masha was not was Masha

27 before

motif

bluntly states bluntly

love storylove Nt ny i cii Seln Stepnova Svetlana critic did only Not . : “On the one hand, it is good, even if it is after a half a after is it if even good, is it hand, one the “On : ” However, , , and ,

in Review 50, who is who 50, Review in was trite

raised a debate over debate a raised

an left

and aspect suffering from Stockholm Stockholm from suffering . d clearest articulation of this debate comes from comes debate this of articulation clearest d ” , “No one d one “No , mance was mance

several reviews several largely She was unable to protect herself from this Nazi, who not who Nazi, this from herself protect to unable was She s econdary.” and rape scene rape and un - impressed with the inclusion of the ‘good Nazi’ ‘good the of inclusion the with impressed themes, addressed efends Masha, she has no family. no has she Masha, efends 62

ussion of the Nazi figure, the discussion of this this of discussion the figure, Nazi the of ussion tragically left to left tragically But, this theme this But,

framed this issue as something as issue this framed concepts like concepts

in the film wereeventuallyfilm the in the analysis also uncovered uncovered also analysis the

rather syndrome and Russian women. women. Russian and

briefly and often often and briefly

tt ta se ol hv no have could she that state be the object of object the be in the film at least led to one to led least at film the in victimhood and collaboration and victimhood reviews , as others had suggested had others as , 172

as well as - century of delay, of century just in order to order in just ” — Kahn’s Kahn’s marked . A number of number A And

173 more than a than more they are not are they Review 65 Review

Masha is Masha

of Review a third third a

every every “the : in 20 in . ,

CEU eTD Collection 174 these theme turnupelsewhere will in understandable captor Nazi the with treason? it is love or circumstances, in falling is war: the of memory decades, that given ‘love the over discussion the underscore h hardship and stress extreme under react circumstances? Holocaust and war the of discussions collabor onscreen,Borovkov,sleepingforwaswith the enemy moreacapital offense. orless sniper theRussian the bulletof when joy, felt even I honestly, speaking “And, died: she that happy was Borovkov end the In irritating character: critic film pls stain ae h bs o it of best the make situation opeless

Review 16. Review16. Nazi’ ‘good the Thus, film the of ininhumaneto live conditions?! end the at d family, her all exterminated and who Germans same the German, the for Petya. affectionately him calling falls mistress, his becomes downright end) the in espionage family, ( reason apparent without who officer, German Masha saw critic film every not But to ad itmod during victimhood and ation this meta this hs ujc ws en s taboo a as seen was subject this iu Borovkov Timur

u te ot riaig n h fl i te usa gr, h fvrt o the of favorite the girl, Russian the is film the in irritating most the But

What are the boundaries of acceptable behavior acceptable of boundaries the are What - theme regarding wartime rape points to points rape wartime regarding theme

—

explicitly figure is the audience thinking of the Nazi enemy in this same way in this Nazi enemyis theaudienceof thinking

cut the thread of her existence.” her thethread of cut The question once again becomes whet becomes again once question The

in ? h war. the 174 Stalingrad ? Was Masha supposed to die fighting, or facing a facing or fighting, die to supposed Masha Was ? declared declared hs ae agr qu larger are These - story’ between the German and the Russian the and German the between story’ —

as ht ol yu ae done have you would what 63 the ht a nt en ad been not had that

ned ti meta this Indeed,

victim n Review in

raises raises physical abuse, threats of reprisals on reprisals of threats abuse, physical . S . issues regarding the boundaries of of boundaries the regarding issues e another emingly ignoring the rape scene, rape the ignoring emingly sin aot h wr narrative war the about estions estroyed her city and forced her her forced and city her estroyed 16 Regardless ofwhattranspir Regardless

in war and how do people people do how and war in that Masha was the most most the was Masha that

- point of contention in the in contention of point hm ses natural seems theme rse fr n for dressed her or not this meta this not or her As If these are not are these If As

n the in al five early

se . same And, ed ed . to

CEU eTD Collection mythology Soviet whic element, human the becomes film war the of focus characters, accessible and sympathetic more with humanity of dose a as well as values production Hollywood in adding By narrative. national stale a into life o mythologynationalin its update to sorely needs Russia critics, Forthese sacrifice. wartime Russia’s commemorate will that films of generation next or point turning an project a such supporting fundingand in complicit be can state the how unexplainable simply is it lens, of type this under critics prese in than awards film in interested more elite cultural a by Russia upon hoisted being is which import, foreign a as some by seen is Nazi’ ‘good the hand, one the On thereof. lack its or merit its for figure material of anda meta revealedthemes number surrounding discourse wider much a of portion significant “an face.”with ahuman enemy romantic, sympathetic, noble, like terms with reviews in described character a Kahn, Peter Hauptmann of inclusion the by disrupted being was Nazis, brutal its with war, the of with blockbuster In of War. clash Patriotic Great the the in of myth found the be over memories would answer the that argued above analysis and discussion film Conclusion te mns raue Fr te fl critics, film other For treasure. man’s other Stalingrad h bd o fl rves nlzd o ti tei poet ersns sal but small a represents project thesis this for analyzed reviews film of body The 2013 Bondarchuk’s Fyodor in figure Nazi the why answer to attempted thesis This

the largest domestic box domestic largestthe eeae te otoes i hd codn t te usa pes The press. Russian the to according had it controversy the generated . And yet others focused on the relationship between this ‘good Nazi’ and a a and Nazi’ ‘good this between relationship the on focused others yet And .

vn te tu’ sec o te a fr uue eeain. o some For generations. future for war the of essence ‘true’ the rving

— how can they fund such trash? But one man’s trash is is trashman’s one But trash? such fund theycan how - office gross in Russian history, the Soviet narrative history, Soviet Russian the in officegross 64 - t hemes being used to discuss this ‘good this being usedhemes Nazi’ todiscuss Stalingrad h provides the basis for a new Post new a for basis the provides h Stalingrad s ai culy ersns the represents actually Nazi ’s Stalingrad namely a tt fne mega funded state a , . Nevertheless, this this Nevertheless, . rder to breathe new breathenew to rder

‘good Nazis,’ Nazis,’ ‘good and as and the - - CEU eTD Collection to attempting first in blogosphere Russian the on discourse for searching effort and time Chapt in discussed As reviews. film these on comments they at been somepoint had archived by app example, for not 41, Review possible. always was them accessing comments, these code and translate to trying in constraints time sheer the Beyond review. actual the than longer even sometimes commentaries, detailed and tw or one perhaps short, relatively were comments these of some Though comments. 2,179 of total a was there blogs 55 these On enabled. had comments have to found were blogs 74 the of 55 example, for process, coding the During rich. if at all? of reviews elsewhere, film reproduced Russian amongst found lens and themes the not become here question key The with. contend not may or may reviews film many that oversight editorial or restrictions count word and formatting the to beholden necessarily film Bondarchuk’s surrounding However, post in Nazism War.Patriotic more something became therefore lens, different under viewed and interpreted character, same The head? the thi dark of all did Or another past? Russia’s of aspect discussing in step first the onscreen shown was what Was beauty. Russian h dsuso of discussion The B over discourse the where place one are comments Online This

this approach only scratches only approach this hss a sgetd n poie eiec o te hfig ersnain of representation shifting the on evidence provided and suggested has thesis

- oit usa fl ad o fl ciis eevd hs go Nz’ figure. Nazi’ ‘good this received critics film how and film Russian Soviet — h ojc o cmeig lis vr h ntoa nraie f h Great the of narrative national the over claims competing of object the or are Russian audiences talking about the ‘good Nazi’ in other ways, other in Nazi’ ‘good the about talking audiences Russian are or Stalingrad — dsore ht n te mdus r ult i not is outlets or mediums other in that discourse a

s etil mc lre ta js tee ,0 o so or 2,000 these just than larger much certainly is

the surface o surface the Vedomosti s simply suggest collaboration, worthy of a bullet to bullet a of worthy collaboration, suggest simply s 65 arently had 322 comments at one time, though time, one at comments 322 had arently

and nolonger viewable. f what is clearly a much larger much a clearly is what f r4 hs hssset considerable spent thesis this 4, er o lines, many were rather verbose verbose rather were many lines, o ondarchuk’s Nazi appears Nazi ondarchuk’s Stalingrad

s whether or or whether s

are discou being being rse

CEU eTD Collection ye question, The triumph? greatest nation’s Russian the remember to children our leave atrocities is in as progress technological or revolution sexual the over the corrupting was some for crisis. Stalingrad different radically so was Nazism with experience its because largely consideration, from excluded was generally) societies democratic in living audiences the to due is West the Hollywoodand in image Nazi the of longevity cinematic and ubiquity the that suggested has literature Nazis’ ‘screen Though West. the of confines the beyond it expanding by media contemporary in and sampling. representativeness of terms traditional in establish to impossible near or difficult often are r Holocaust or formation identity national like issues consequential understand to want truly researchers If online. occur to continue will and do clashes memory such But overcome. be previo As sets. data know technical time, the have not did simply thesis this But “Germans.” “Stalingrad,” “Bondarchuk,” terms: search specific LiveJou site, blogging popular one just on 2015 April in search preliminary A reactions. and segments audience potential identify emembrance in the Russian Federation, they will need to begin delving into materials that materials into delving begin to need will they Federation, Russian the in emembrance responsible

The data body revealed a debate over a perceived turning point in Russian film, whic film, Russian in point turning perceived a over debate a revealed body data The Nevertheless, this thesis has also contributed to the li the to contributed also has thesis this Nevertheless,

for , the discussion of the Nazi figure was was figure Nazi the of discussion the , -

so for discussions over foreign cultural influence, discussions over unstated Nazi unstated over discussions influence, cultural foreign over discussions for

- long usly discussed, there are many methodological and technical concerns to to concerns technical and methodological many are there discussed, usly

. ignored The analysis here arguably supports that supposition. At least in in least At supposition. that supports arguably here analysis The very very , and and , - how and resources to sift through such potentially enormous potentially such through sift to resources and how roots of Russia’s foundational myth. Rather than anxieties anxieties than Rather myth. foundational Russia’s of roots discussions discussions Nazi rnal.ru, resulted in 5,740 blog entries using fairly fairly using entries blog 5,740 in resulted rnal.ru, , the case of Russia (or the former Eastern bloc bloc Eastern former the (or Russia of case the , figure’s ability to play on the fear and fantasies of fantasiesof andfear the on play to abilityfigure’s 66

of inexorably linked to inexorablylinked h nx generation next the the terature on depictions of Nazism of depictions on terature West, Stalingrad the Post the — ht eay o we do legacy what - Soviet identity Soviet ’s ‘good Nazi’ ‘good ’s h t CEU eTD Collection for future basis a provided has hopefully, and, gap, this bridging begin to attempted least at has thesis Post sc that suggested strongly has thesis this films, these in appearance an make that Nazis screen of type the of Regardless fall. this released as are films: set War Patriotic Great three least at be will there alone 2015 In Nazis. screen of numbers ample with wider reception of reviews these beyond found anxieties same the are these whether to turns again, Panfilov’s 28 Men 28 Panfilov’s Quiet - Soviet war cult will remain stunted and deficient without without deficient and stunted remain will cult war Soviet And for the foreseeable future, Russian cinema will likely continue to be inundat be to continue likely will cinema Russian future, foreseeable the for And , which were which , fruitful The Battle of Sevastopol of Battle The stu Stalingrad dies. , which has a has which , both

released in April shortly before this the this before shortly April in released

or any depicting film Nazism. other Russian Nazis and 300

- and a remake of the Soviet classic Soviet the of remake a and esque infused online ad campaign and is due to be be to due is and campaign ad online infused esque 67 holarly understanding of the trajectory of the the of trajectory the of understanding holarly

tdig uh figures. such studying sis was submitted, as well well as submitted, was sis The Dawns The —

in the the in Here This This ed ed CEU eTD Collection “Bondarchuk «Stalingrad».LarisaBondarchuk,«Spasibo za and Fyodor, Putinu Yusipova.Izvestia, Bondarchuk, F.Bondarchuk Fyodor. kul’t smurfov i“Stalingrad” pro zluyu molodezh’, v3D. Bommes,and Michael,ofResidence’: Patrick The Wright.In and Public “‘Charms thePast.” Boletskaya,Kseniya, Aleksey “Fil’m and Rozhkov. Boletskaya,Kseniya. “«Stalingrad» Blacker,In Etkind. “Introduction.”and Uilleam, Alexander Biltereyst, Maltby,Meers. Richard Daniel, Audiences “Cinema, and Modernity: Philippe Bezrukova,Lyudmila. “Kamniikadry.” Bathrick, Hi/storyTheIsDavid.It? U.S.Reception “Whose of Downfall.” Basuroy, Chatterjee, Ravid.“HowAre Subimal andCritical Abraham Suman, Critical S. Baraban, theWartimeSubjectivity “Forget War: Elena. inPost “Fil’mapi_x. ‘Stalingrad’Medinskomu mozhetstoit’ portfelyaLiveJournal. ministra.” Al’perina, “‘Stalingrad’: novyy Susanna. front.” Allen, Robert C.“Relocating American Film History.” Alasuutari, Pertti.Three “Introduction: InReception Phases ofStudies.” “9 Maya REN ТV Bibliography April 20,2015. October 28,2013. http://top.rbc.ru/viewpoint/27/09/2013/879170.shtml Interview Kirill by Sirotkin GregorBill 253 McLennan, Schwarz, and Sutton, David Making Studi Histories: m_o_lve_yashine http://www.vedomosti.ru/lifestyle/articles/2013/05/16/central_partnership_snimet_fil p polmilliarda http://www.vedomosti.ru/ne York: Palgrave 2013. Macmillan, Europe Daniel Biltereyst, 1 Introduction.”An In http://www.rg.ru/2011/04/28/bondarchuk.html. Critique of Marketing Reviews Slavonic PapersCanadian api AgentstvoRassledovaniy Politicheskikh http://www.rg.ru/2014/05/08/stalingrad.html 88. 1999. Publications, Media Agenda Audience: TheNew o 21, 2015. artnership.’” - voyne x.livej

v , edited Blacker, by Uilleam andJulie Alexander Etkind, ed -

? The Office Box Star? Power,Budgets.” Effects and ofFilm Critics, 34, no.102(Fall 2007): 1 idi ournal.com/1178.html http://m.ren.tv/novosti/2015 ë t p - . s i okazhet okazhet

67 (October 2003): 103 smotri VTB Vedomosti

http://

http://izvestia.ru/news/559639

– p . 16. Oxon ; New York,Routledge,16. Oxon ; NY: 2011. eregovory k

Cinema Audiences and Cinema

ria.ru/culture/20110516/375267863.html ul’tovyy es inHistory , May 16,2013.

54, no.3 . RBK September Print, 27, 2013. wspaper/articles/2013/10/15/stalingrad v zyal zyal f . o il’m il’m

Rossiyskaya Gazeta

inansirovanii ‘Stalingrada.’”inansirovanii – p , edited by Pertti Alasuutari,, edited 1 by Pertti 16. olmilliarda.” – - o – 4 (2012): 295 WritingPolitics and -

68 17. v 05

, November 2,2013., November oyne ’Idioyne

Rossiyskaya Gazeta -

07/9 . Modernity: AnModernity: Introduction o

- L’ve

maya Cultural Studies Cultural . Vedomosti

– s motri".” Y 317. Memory and Theory inEastern Memory andTheory - . , April 28, 2011. , April 28,2011.

ren ashine

- Soviet Russian Films.” Russian Soviet –

- tv 302. Routledge, 2013. , edited by Johnson, Richard - , October 15, , October 2013. pokazhet REN TV REN s , May 8, 2014. , May nimet ‘Tsentralnimet .

RIA Novosti RIA

Fedo 20, no.1(2006): 48 – Rethinking the Rethinking

21. Londo21. - New German vzyal . Accessed May - r kultovyy , 1 , edited by, edited – - 24. New . Accessed n: Sage Journal -

film - – CEU eTD Collection GraemeGill, J. Gillespie, David. on “Defence Patriotism Russian The ofthe ‘New’ Screen.” Realm: Gallagher, Friedman,ImagesLester“Darkness D.AmericanIn Visible: Nazis in of Film.” Friedländer, Saul. “F “F Alexander.Etkind, “Mapping Memory.” Ellman, Michael, “Soviet Deat S. andMaksudov “Ekranizatsiya Duan,and Bin AndrewB.“Do Wenjing, Online Gu, Whinston. Reviews Matter? Dolin, Anton.“Aleksa “DevelopmentInternet Regions.” Russia’s in Yandex, ofthe 2013. “Demidova iz uvolili Deacon,David.In Counting “Why Counts.” Crawford,Beverly, Martel. and ofGermansand James Germans “Representations What Alon.Confino, “Collective Memory and Cu Cohen ——— Carleton, Gregory.Done “History Right:Dynamics and in War ofTriumphalism Buttsworth,and eds. Sara, Maartje Abbenhuis, ë ë dor Bondarchuk dor Bondarchukfil’m ‘Stalingrad’ cnyat’ podumybaet v3D.”dor - Pfister, Laurel.Pfister, Its theSecondLost Warand “Claiming World Generation: Unsere CambridgeUniversity Press, 2011. Journal ofPower Institutions Post in Greenwood Conn: Press,Westport, 1976. State UniversityYorkNew Press, of Albany, 2004. Darkness, onScreen EvilandSlime Thomas.Indian Bloomington: http://www.gazeta.ru/news/culture/2009/11/10/n_1423016.shtml 2010. Europe Novosti 16. InvestigationEmpirical of Panel Data.” _russkoj_auditorii_infantilno http://www.vedomosti.ru/library/artic Vedomosti http://download.yandex.ru/company/ya_russian_regions_report_2013.pdf spb.ru/news/commen by MichaelPickering, 89 Institute.HistoricalYork: New Cambridge University 1997. Press, David E.Barclay Glaserand Elisabeth ImagesTransatlantic ImagesRepresent:Film American In thePostwar and Perceptionsin Era.” Public American Review Historical Studies ofMütter, Unsere Emotion.” thePolitics and Väter no. 1(2010): 135 . “Victory Narratives Annihilation Today.” inDeath: inRussia Contemporary Culture.” Russian inPost Nazism

Matthew P. Matthew http://www.rg.ru/2010/07/07/stalingrad

- . Accessed 20,2015. April r 50, no.1(February 104 2014): Asia Studies SymbolsPolitics andLegitimacy inSoviet omana ‘Dukhless’ ‘Dukhless’ omana , February2012. 10, Reflections of Nazism:AnEssay of and DeathReflections onKitsch p - rosit rosit za za Bondarchuka.” ndr Rodnyanskiy: «Soznaniye Rodnyanskiy:Infantil’no».”ndr Auditorii Russkoy - The Soviet History of World WarWorld TheII: Soviet History ofMyths, Memories, War Culture Popular – 68. d

eneg 46, no.4(1994): 671 ts15184.htm

and Perceptions:and America Germany since 1776 – n 104. Edinburgh Press, 2008. University a Stalingrad.” s , 1997.

p .

a1993. University Press, oliticheskim oliticheskim

APN Severo Slavic Review . Eastern European Memory StudiesEastern

http://ria.ru/culture/20111209/511291318.html

, edited by Murray Pomerance, 255 ltural History: ltural ProblemsofMethod.” - . Santa Barbara, Praeger, CA: 2010. Research Method les/2012/02/10/aleksandr_rodnyanskij_soznanie Soviet 69 - – Schmidt. Publications ofthe Publications GermanSchmidt. 23. theMirror: Representations in of Monsters Decision Support Systems Support Decision

hs in theGreaths in War: A Patriotic Note.” Gazeta.ru

–

p 80. Societies odtekstom - - Zapad anons.html

70, no.3(Fall70, 2011): 615 . Cambridge ; York: New

, November 10,2009. Seminar: A Journal ofGermanic , December2013. 8,

3 (2005). s for Cultural Studies Cultural s for

v yydet G.” v2012 .

Rossiyskaya Gazeta

History &History Memory . Translated by Weyr .

45 (2008): 1007 45 (2008):

, October 2010. a – nd 71. Albany:71. Bad: Infamy,

www.apn . – , edited by, The

- RIA

36.

R An , edited ealities The

, July .

– -

22,

7, .

CEU eTD Collection Henry.Jenkins, “Izvestnyyre dinamika“Internet vRossii: proniknoveniya.LetoMay 2014/FOM.” Accessed 6,2015. Hutchings,Nataliaand Rulyova. “Commemorating Stephen, Past/performing the thePresent: Hutchings, “Introduction.” Stephened. In C., Hughey, Savior Film Matthew “TheWhite andReviewers’ W. Reception.” Holbrook, Morris“Popular B. AppealJudgments ofMo Expert versus Hoberman, “QuentinInglouriousBasterds Fun.” Taratino’s Makes J. Revisionism Holocaust “Historyand Mission.” Higson,In ofNational “The Andrew. Concept Cinema.” Haynes, Michael.“CountingGreat Deaths Soviet the War: in A Patriotic Note.” Hake, Sabine. Gusejnov, Gasan. IstvanGreenblatt, Rev, and Stephen, Randolph Starn.“Introduction.” Gray,“Audience ReceptionRetrospect:with Audiences.” Ann.and Research The in Trouble “ScantGraffy, Julian. Sign and Fear ofThaw: Anxiety Foreigners inthe Representation in LiveIdentityGorny, Impact Eugene.ofCultural“Russian The Journal: Development onthe Godeanu NewUniversity York Press, 2006. April 17,2009. http://fom.ru/SMI NY: Routledge, 2008. Rulyova, ed. 1st Routledge Serie Signals Conflicting (de)construction ofIn Nationhood.” Russian Telev Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave 2008. Macmillan, Intercultural Interaction of Consumer Research 18/film/quentin VoiceThe Village kino.ru/fund/mission/ 52 Alan Williams, Studies The UniversityMadison, Wis: 2012. Press, ofWisconsin London:Routledge,Kindle Edition. Communication Blogosphere.”In 1995): 1 Issue:SpecialIdentifying Histories: Eastern Europe(Winter Beforeand 1989 After London:37. 1999. Sage Publications, In Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave 2008. Macmillan, Screening Dialogue Intercultural the Soviet Films oftheKrushchevIn Years.” Internet Creativity Inof a Virtual Community.” European Studies Interpretation:Excessive Contextuali - Kenworthy, and Oana Popescu Oana, Rethinking the Media Audience: the MediaRethinking TheNew Agenda ision Coverageision the SecondWarVictory of World and Celebrations the zhissër Fëdor Bondarchuk Fëdor vpartiyuzhissër vstupil ‘Yedinaya Rossiya.’” Screen Nazis: Cinema, History, andDemocracy Screen Nazis:

55, no.2(20 – Fans, Bloggers, andGamers:Fans, Bloggers, 14.

“Divided by Some Web: a Characteristics Common Russian ofthe

33, no.3(Summer 2010): 475

D ialogue - http://www.ria.ru/culture/20090417/168379405.html , editedLunde, byInguun Gorham, Michael S Paulsen, and Martin Cinema Fund tarantino Digital Russia: The Language, Culture and Politics of New of TheLanguage,CultureandPolitics Russia: Media Digital

- , August 18, 2009. 18, , August 44, no.3(2014): 225 – , 212 i , edited byBirgitNatalia Hutchings, Beumers,C. and Stephen - 67. New Rutgers Brunswick, N.J.: University Press, 2002. internet/11740 03): 303 .

. Studies inCentral. Studies andEasternHoundmills, Europe.

26, no.2(September 144 1999): 26, – 61. VDM Verlag, 2009. - s - inglourious – A Creative History of the Russian Internet: the Russian A Creative Studi History of . Accessed May 31,2015. 9.

s on Russian and EastNew and Europeans onRussian York, Studies. , edited by Stephen Hutchings, 27

2014. http://www.villagevoice.com/2009 zing 3Weeks 4 Months, and 2Days.”

70 Russia Exploring Participatory Culture Exploring - – - basterds Sandu. “From Representation to Sandu. Minimalist 48.

–

96.

The Post The and Its Other(s) onFilm: Screening Russia andItsOther(s) onFilm:Russia

makes Film andNationalism , edited by A Pertti

- Soviet Media: Russian . Wisconsin Film Studies. Film Studies. . Wisconsin - – holocaust http://eng.fond

55.

Representations tion Pictures.”tion - revisionism – 46. Houndmills, 46. Houndmills, Symbolic .

- . New York: , edited by lasuutari, 22 - RIA Novosti RIA 08 Europe - Journal of Journal

es in -

49, no. fun/ - Asia .

– .

CEU eTD Collection MacLeod, GroupLiveJournal.” Political “Examining Membership Heather. on MartinMachtans, A.Ruehl. and Karolin, Lipovetsky, “Post Mark. «Stalingrad».”Levkin, Andrey.“Medinskiy, Putin, Lebow, RichardNed.In Europe.” “TheMemoryinPostwar ofPolitics aLawton,“Toward New Anna.Cinema, 1976 OpennessSoviet in Valeriy.Kuznetsov, “‘Stalingrad’ stal samymkass Memories,Kuntsman, Adi.“Online Digitalandthe Conflicts War.” Cybertouch of Kuhn, Annette.MemoryIn “Cinemaas Cultural Memory.” “Kritika/ Stalingrad (2013).” ——— Kretschmann, T “ Germany Nazi Kingsepp, Our Devil?: as “HitlerIn Eva. Media.” inMainstream ——— Kenez, Peter. “Bl Kansteiner, “Finding Wulf. inMemory:A Methodological Meaning ofCollective Critique ——— K inopoisk.ru.” 26. Eurasian Studies inRussian, European and Central NewMedia sincePolitics 1945 356 the Recent Period.” http://polit.r Fogu.Claudio DukeDurham: University Press, 2006. Memory Europ inPostwar IndianaMidland Book.Press, 1989. Bloomington: University Cinema inthe Soviet UnionandEasternEurope anons.html Rossiyskaya Gazeta 1 Icons: European andCentral Eurasian StudiesinRussian, NewMedia MemoryCinema andCultural http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/468196/press/ http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2305706 tochki zreniya. October4,2013. Kommersant’, . Ya eshchë raz okunut http://www.kinopoisk.ru/interview/2225733/ Interview by Tsulaya. Dariko ButtsworthAbbenhuis, 29 andMaartje inPost Nazism the Mirror: of Representations Indiana 2008. University Press, Cinema In. “The Films.” Picture Enemy ofthe inStalinist Press, 1995. WartimeRussia Memory Studies.” University 2000. Press, New York: Reinventing Studies Film . “Reception Theoryand Audience TheIn Research: Mystery Vampire’s Kiss.” ofthe – 12.

– 77.

homas. Tomas Krechmann: «U Krechmann:homas. Tomas moyegogeroya inetnedezhdy».net vykhoda edited byZara M.Norris Torlone, and 96 Stephen M. Alexa ack and White: TheIn onFilm.” War White: and ack .

Arnold ; Co Arnold ; u/article/2013/11/05/al051113

. Accessed 10,2015. May . , edited by 157 Stites, Richard - Sots: TransformationsSots: the Realism ofSocialist in Popular Culture of History andTheory . Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. , October 21, 2013. , October The Slavic and East European JournalSlavic andEastEuropean The KinoPoisk ’syaeturaskryt’ istoriyu, v eësdrugoy storony, srusskoy

- published inthe UnitedStates of America by Oxford , edited by Linda Williams and Christine Gledhill. London :, edited Gledhill. andChristine byLinda Williams e , edited by Richard Ned Lebow,, edited Ned byKansteiner, Richardand Wulf KinoPoisk , 1

. Accessed May. Accessed 6,2015. – 15. New York: N York:15. New H itler itler 71

– 41, no. 2 (May 2002): 179 41, no.2(May 2002): http://www.rg.ru/2013/10/21/kino 52. Santa Barbara,52. Santa 2010. Praeger, CA: , August 2013. 20,

. - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/kinopoisk.ru

. Films from Germany:Films from Cinema and History,

ovym fil’momgoda.” rossiyskim

. Polit.ru

– - War PopularCulture 75. Bloomington:Indiana University

Culture andEntertainment Culture in , edited Goulding. byDaniel, J. Insiders and Outsiders in Russian Russian in Insiders andOutsiders ewUniversity York Press, 2002. , November2013. 5, Dreaming ofFredandGinger:Dreaming

1987.” In 1987.” 48, no.3(Autumn 2004):

– 112. Bloomington: The Politics of Politics The

1, no.1(200 – 97. , edited by Sara Post New Wave Post New

, no. 4 (2010): , no. Digital Icons:Digital Monsters in - site Digital Digital 9): 13 -

–

CEU eTD Collection ——— ——— Norris, Stephen M. Nolan,L.I. Adrianne. “‘Shitting Medals’: Neiger, and Oren Eya Motti, Meyers, “Narodnyy prazdnik Naralenkova, masshtabe Oksana.“V Gollivuda.” Naimark, Norman M. “My p Petr. “Minis Morozov, Mitchell, Charles P. BarbaraMisztal, A. Ivo. Mijnssen, Identit “TheVictory Myth andRussia’s Mendelsohn, Dani patrioticheskiye“Medinskiy:Fond proizodit’ kinodolzhen blokbastery.” McQuail, Denis. Magilow, T.VanderLugt, H.,Kristin Daniel Elizabeth Bridges, and eds. InMagilow, H.“Introduction.” Daniel reklonyae New Media Communism.” Co TheRussian . “Patriot Games: NinthCompanyand 1, no.2(2007): 163 II War World Films andHistorical Memories.” . “GuidingThe Comet Stars: Bloomington:Indiana University 2008. of the Personality 1965 Cult, Neiger, Eyal Palgrave and OrenMeyers, Zandberg.York: New 2011. Macmillan, In http://fom.ru/Proshloe/10430 http://www.rg.ru/2012/02/08/stalingrad 1995. 1945 http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/49438 k рубежом сталинград www z Bondarchuka t na Company,Inc., 2009. Miniseries 2000 Portrayals,through 1940 England: University Open Press, 2003. (2010): 6 http://www.newsweek.com/tarantino Gazeta InternationalGroup, 2012. Publishing ImageNazi inLow Bridges, 1 and Culture ayavku azhdyy On Media Collective Media Memory: Age Memory inaNew - .

1949 change , May 22,2013. msya pered vsemi,ktonasmert’ stoyal z n r – - Audience Analysis ubezh ubezh a ‘Oskar’.” – отозвать 9. . Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of HarvardMass: Belknap 1997, University. Cambridge, of Press, Press el. “Tarantino Rewritesel. “Tarantino theHolocaust.” , no. 8 (2012): 67 , no.8(2012): 18. New York, NY: Continuum International NY: York, Continuum 18. New 2012. Group, Publishing - , edited by H. Magilow, Daniel Kristin T.Vander Lugt,and Elizabeth Blockbuster History in the New Russia: Movies,Blockbuster Historyinthe NewRussia: Memory, andPatriotism

ф Theories ofSocialRemembering Theories . The Hitler Filmography: Worldwide FeatureWorldwide The Hitler Filmography: FilmandTelevision - org -

The Russians in Germany: in The Russians A 9 maya.” 2012. (FOM),9 OpinionFoundation Public 2, May terstvo Kul’tury prokatZapretit’ RF: f бондарчука Digital Icons:Digital European andCentral Eurasian StudiesinRussian, o / erritorii RF;erritorii tchizny.” p - / - министерство Brow Cinema and Culture – заявку 89.

Change.org www.rg.ru/2013/05/22/medinskiy

- Prezident Rossii - на . Thousand Oaks, Calif: . Thousand Calif: Oaks, на - – - . like Rise oflike Rise Russia: theWar Film Putin’s in Recent 1982.” North University Carolina of Hill, at Chapel

l Zandberg. “On Media Memory: Editors’ Introduction.” MediaZandberg. “On Memory:l Editors’ 96. Zapretit’ etogo prokat fil’ma r za

- - оскар территории Nazisploitation! The Nazi ImageNazisploitation! inLow

. Accessed April 18,2015. . Accessed April Press, 2012.

- Brezhnev, культуры - # rewrites

72 share

- site.html

Rossiyskaya Gazeta . Jefferson, North Carolina:& McFarland . , May9, 2015. - History ofthe Soviet Zone ofOccupation,

рф

- the Great andFailure the War, Patriotic . TheorizingMaidenhead, Society. -

. New York, NY: Continuum рф holocaust y.” - Studies in Russian andSoviet inRussian Cinema Studies запретить . a -

запретить

k Russian Analytical Digest Analytical Russian Newsweek . azhduyu

Sage 1997. Publications,

il’ nvergent Culturesafter ma ‘Stalingrad’ F.ma ‘Stalingrad’ - 79003 - anons.html - прокат - u прокат , August 13,2009. August , , February, 9,2012. litsu, litsu, ubezhom, , edited by Motti Motti , edited by .

Nazisploitation! The Nazisploitation! Rossiyskaya - этого k - azhdyy фильма .

- Brow CinemaBrow

- Otozvat’ Otozvat’ фильма , no.72 d

- om,

- за - .

CEU eTD Collection Sherlock, Thomas.“Destroying Past, Creating aUncertainIn Settled an Future.” Schrøder, Media Kim “TheBestAudience Christian. Both Worlds? of Research between “Sbory/ Posledniy Sandle, Mark. “BrezhnevIdeology andIn DevelopedThe Socialism: Zastoi?” of Ellen,Rutten, Julie Fedor, andZvereva, Vera eds. ——— Ellen.Rutten, Language “Web Digital Wars: and Diasporas ofMemory.” the Rohdewald, Stefan. “Post Richardson, Michael“Sexual Devianceand D.theNakedBody Representations inCinematic “Rech’ VladimiraPutina Rau, Petra. Pёtr Fёdorov, Kre Tomas “PobedaID. Medvedeva.” PF Svoboda: Vystupleniye Prezidenta Andrey.Plakhov, “V “Peskov: Nepravda, “Parad Pobedy “Pamyat’ o VelikoyMay OpinionFoundation Otechestvennoy.”Public (FOM), 8,2013. Osborn, Andrew.“Medvedev CreatesHistory Commission.” InOlick, Jeffery K.“Introduction.” Creating anUncertainCreating Future Narratives intheSoviet Unionand Post Pertti Alasuutari, 38 In Paradigms.”Rival http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/95322/box Palgrave, 2002. and East EuropeanHistoryand Basingstoke, Society. Houndmills, Hampshire: Reconsider Wars Post in Alexander Etkind, and InWars.” . “Why DigitalOverlook Memory EasternMemory Not Should Europe’s Studies 76. Eurasian Studies inRussian, andCentral Language Studies Ukrainethe Second WarinRussia, World Lithuania.” and InternationalNew NY: York, Continuum 2012. Group, Publishing edited byDaniel Kristin T.VanderLugt, H.Magilow, Bridges, 38 andElizabeth Inof Nazis.” G Edinburgh 2013. University Press, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPKBoYDCa_0 11.10.13 10, 2010. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2314393 e_nasledie_eto_ploho http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2013/05/22/peskov_nepravda_chto_surkovsko http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20989 http://fom.ru/Proshloe/10913 2009, sec. Business. Durham: Duke UniversityPress, 2003. in Transformations National azeta

Our Nazis: RepresentationsOur Nazis: andFilm FascisminContemporary Literature of , May 10,2012. n . a Krasnoy

Fil’m YouTube, Pro, 11, October 2013 h Memory and Theory inEastern Europe Memory andTheory ed ttp://www.rg.ru/2010/05/10/tekst p oyezd.” - c Nazisploitation! The Nazi I The Nazi Nazisploitation! , edited by Edwin Bacon and Mark Sandle,Edwin 165 edited Bacon and by Mark , Socialist States Socialist hto Surkovskoyehto r askopkakh Stalingrada.”askopkakh

n ts - 44, no.2(2008): 173 Soviet RemembranceSoviet the HolocaustNational of and a chmann, Fёdor Bondarchuk p – http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124277297306236553 KinoPoisk v loshchadi.” loshchadi.” 68. Lond Rethinking theMediaRethinking Audience: TheNew Agenda . oennom

Julie http://www.rg.ru/2012/05/10/putin States of Memory: Continuities, Conflicts, Memory:States of Continuities, and Fedor, 219 . London:. 2013. Routledge, . Retrospection

. NewNY: York, Palgrave M

on: Sage Publications, 1999. on: Sage Publications, p . Accessed May. Accessed 31,2015. n arade aslediye Prezident

n 73

– a Krasnoy a – - Kommersant.ru 31. New York:New Palgrave 31. mage inLow

. Soviet Russia: DestroyingSoviet aSettled Russia: Past, 84. .

- European NewMedia

, edited by, edited K.Olick, Jeffery 1 Memory,Web andNewMedia: Conflict e Rossii

- to vystuplenia.html .

lokho.” o ‘Stalingrade’ . , May 9,2014. , edited byUilleam, Blacker, p loshchadi vMoskve.” . -

Wall Street Journal Brow CinemaBrow andCulture

, October 2013. 9, Vedomosti

- Rossiyskaya Gazeta Forum for Modern Forum forModern

rech.html acmillan, 2007. – . 87. Studies in Russian inRussian 87. Studies

. Industriya . Industriya , no. 4 (2010): 171 , no.4(2010): Macmillan, 2013. Macmillan,

, May, 22, 2013. .

Digital Icons:Digital , edited byedited , Memories of – , May 21, Historical Historical

Brezhnev Rossiyskaya 16. 16.

. k

ino , May – , o . 54. t –

CEU eTD Collection Van “ Gorp, Jasmijn. ——— Tumarkin, Nina. and “The Great WarMemory.” as Patriotic Myth Tsao, Wen Trubina, Elena.“Past intheRussianBlogosphere: Wars of Cosmopolitan OntheEmergence “TheIndustry Federation.” Russian Film inthe Strasbourg: European Audovisual Taylor, Richard. Taylor, withFilm Charles.Criticism.” Problem “The L.Sullivan, John Oleg.Sulkin, “Identifying theEnemyIn Film.” Russian inContemporary Su Richard. Stites, Nazi ExploitationStiglegger, in beyondand Marcus.theCinema Evil? of “Cinema Good the “Stalingrad.” Staiger, Janet. ——— Sperling, Va Daphne.Skillen, GeneralIn “TheRussia.” Next Elections in 64:x/fSiniy Fil “Stalingrad.” 64:x/fSiniy Fil “Stalingrad.” Wesley.Shrum, and MediationinHighbrow Cultural Publics: “Critics Popular and - 35. “Patsifizm ili35. “Patsifizm ekzistentsial’nyye vpubertate.” mazhora uzhasy Comment. 1991 NewBasic 1994. Books, York: . 04 (October 595 2003): Research Consumer ReviewsRatingsCritic andonMoviegoers.” Media Memory.” m+EN.pdf/f04caaf1 http://www.obs.coe.int/documents/205595/552774/RU+Film+Industry+2010+Nevafil Observatory,2010. September I.B. SAGECalif: Publications, 2013. 113 Cinema Russian Outsiders in February 19,2011. Soviet Bridges, 21 and Culture Its1970s and InHeritage.” University 2000. Press, Idea.” . “TheLast ofa Refuge Patriotism, Scoundrel: Laruelle, 218 and Reassertion Nationalism Russian theNational ofRussia Hutchings,and Natalia Rulyova, 21 Media Communism: after Future The Pastas http://kino.oper.ru/video/view.php?t=582 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLWlyANDov0 Performing Arts.” The Living & ofWorld The Living ofthe Cult War II Dead: andFall in Russia TheRise the - – Chin. “Which Type “Which Chin. The Online Is Review of Influence Persuasive? More of Tauris, 1998. Tauris, - 26. Bloomington:Indiana University Press, 2008. lerie. “Making the Public Patriotic: Militarism and“Makinglerie. Patriotic:Militarism Anti thePublic 2005.” KinoPoisk , no.4(2010): 63 Nations andNationalism Nations Paperbacks Cambridge1992. 7.CambridgeUniversity Press, [England]: Perverse Reception Theof Film Spectators: Practices Russian Popular Culture: Entertainment PopularCulture: Russian andSociety since1900

Film Propaganda: SovietGermany andNazi Russia Film Propaganda: 14, no. 4 (December 2014): 14, no.4(December Media Audienc Media Digital Icons: Studies inRussi Icons:Digital – , edited by H.Magilow, Daniel Kristin T.Vander Lugt,and Elizabeth 37. New York, NY: Continuum International NY: York, Continuum 37. New 2012. Group, Publishing Media, Culture &Media, Culture Society – InvertingFilmas Policy: Nation Builder Film inPost 71. New York: Routledge, York: 71. New 2009. . Accessed May. 31,2015.

American Journal ofSociology American http://www.kinopoisk.ru/fil - 151a

Oper.ru Video, 2013. YouTube Video, 2013. – – 611. 85. es: Effects, Users, Institutions, and Power Institutions, es: Users, Effects, - 41bf Nazisploitation! The Nazi Image inLow Nazisploitation!

, edited by Stephen M. Norris and Zara, editedM.Norris and by Stephen M.Torlone, -

9a8d 9, no.2(2003): 235

– - 36. London ;New York:36. Routledge, 2011. 53b861a4171d 559 74

33, no. 2 (2011): 243 33, no.2(2011):

. an, Eurasian European andCentral New –

83. http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/468196/ , edited byBirgit Beumers, Stephen Dissent

Militarism andtheMilitarism Russian National m/95322

, 1991. – . .

53. , Fall 2011.

Globalisation, FreedomGlobalisation, andthe

. Electronic CommerceElectronic

European Review European , edited by Marlène – - . New York:. New New York Militarism in Russia.” InMilitarism inRussia.” . 2nd rev. ed. London: ed.. 2ndrev. 58.

Insiders and Insiders - . Thousand Oaks, - Soviet Russia, Russia, Soviet Brow CinemaBrow . Cambridge KinoPoisk

11, no.

. .

, CEU eTD Collection Zorkaia, “AllInFront! Victory!” for Markovna. Neia the Allfor ——— “AYoungblood, War Remembered: Films J. oftheGreat War.” Denise Patriotic Soviet Yekelchyk, “MemoryLook Screen: Serhy. Silver and onthe Wars Russia Back Ukraine at ElizabeWood, ——— Wolfgram, A. “TheMemory Mark “Russia John. Wendle, Moves toBan ofWWII Criticism Win.” Weiner, Amir. “Utterly James Ward, Redeeming ‘Naziwithout J. Science’Beyond Value? Social Walters, Ben.InglouriousBasterds.” “Debating “Vystupleniye “Voyennom the Soviet Cinema of Kansas, 2006. . American Review Historical no. 2(2013): 4 the Second War.” World Russia.” 13. Research Challenges.” . “TheCollective for Memory of Process Methodological Research: Solutions Wittlinger, 55 Europe Identity inContemporary Data SourcesIn inCollective Memory Common Studies.” 2015. Re 92 Culture In Cinema.”Exploitation http://www.filmquarterly.org/2009/12/talking http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/11196 OtechestvennoyVoyne.” 2013. Russian War Russian Onthe Cinema Films: – volution

112. New York: Continuum International 112. New York: Group, Publishing Continuum 2012. p http://content.time.com/ http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/18089 arade v th A. “Performing Memory: Vladimir Putin andthe Putin Celebrationth A.“PerformingVladimir of WWII Memory: in n Making Sense of War: The Second WorldWar: War oftheMaking Bolshevik of TheSecond Fate Sense andthe , edited H.Magilow, by Kristin T.VanderLugt,and Daniel Elizabeth Bridges, a The Soviet andPost voyennom p voyennom . Princeton, N.J: Princeton. Princeton, University N.J: 2001. Press, – c – 68. Oxford: Berghahn Books,68. Oxford: 2012. hest’ 68 hest’ 13.

, 167

arade, – German Politics andSociety Politics German - Y 93. New York: Books, Hippocrene 1989. Austra Prezident Rossii Nazisploitation! Nazisploitation! The Nazi Image inLow g - odovshchiny Velikoy Pobedy.” Market Dictum: GaugingInherentMarket Dictum: Bias the inDifferent

106, no. 3 (June 2001):106, no.3(June 839 - p Soviet Review time/world/article/0,8599,1896927,00.html osvyaschёnnom 66 osvyaschёnnom lian andNewZealandlian Journal ofEuropeanStudies , editedLan by Eric Front, 1914 Front, 75

Film Quarterly Film , May 2011. 9,

38, no. 2(2011): 172 38, no. - point - - 2005 Y

. -

. debating 25, no.81(Spring 102 2007):

genbacher, Bill Niven, andgenbacher, Bill Ruth Niven, g

odovshchine Pobedy vVelikoyodovshchine . Lawrence:. University Press , 2009. – Time The Illustrated HistoryThe of Illustrated 56. Dynamics of MemoryDynamics of and Prezident Rossii Prezident

. Accessed19, April inglorious –

- 200. Brow CinemaBrow and

- bastards/ .

, May 9, The . –

5, CEU eTD Collection Romanized BGN/PCGN 176 175 Review 7 Review 6 Review 5 Review 4 Review 3 Review 2 Review 1 Identifier Review Appendi

Three versions of the title are p versionstitleare ofthe Three 2015 as ofMay31, available listing Original

175

Okolo «Stalingrada» Okolo «Сталинграда» Около House] Surrendered Pavlov’s Bondarchuk, theson, orHow[Stalingrad Pizza, «Dom Pav kak Bondarchuk Stalingradskaya ili pitstsa, сдал «ДомПавлова» как Бондарчук или пицца,Сталинградская Stalingrad Need[Does Russia a Such “Stalingrad”? Rossii Nuzhen li takoy "Сталинград"? Нужен России ли такой Insults Some [WhyFilm the kogo Pochemu “Stalingrad” fil’m оскорбляет кого "Сталинград" фильмПочему of the film and Spielberg: AnAnalysis Unionof[The Brezhnev «Stalingrad» Spilberga: fil’ma analiz Coyuz Brezhneva i фильма «Сталинград» Спилберга: анализ Союз Брежнева и [Ordered Prikazano выжатьПриказано only[Not a movie] Ne kino tol’ko кино Не только Review Title x A - to oskorblyaet Russia :

Table of to Squeeze

?] lova» vyzhat’ Stalingra n; and (3) author’s n;(3) and

] 176

rovided in the following order: in the order: following rovided

Stalingrad

syn sdal syn sdal

d ]

]

- - сын то

KinoPoisk :

http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/468196/press

English translation English Echo Moskvy Iskusstvo Kino VM.ru Publication Review Chaskor.ru Odnako Pravda.ru RIA Novosti 76

(1) Cyrillic Russian title in bold in Cyrillic title Russian (1)

AggregatedReviews

inbrackets

Kirichenko Nikolay Arkhangel’skiy Andrey Roshina Yekaterina Author Review Chantsev Aleksandr Kondrashov Aleksandr Yevseyev Anton Afanas’eva Natal’ya .

;

(2) Oct 31 Nov 1 Nov 13 2013) Date Oct 23 Oct 24 Oct 29 Oct 30

t itle in

(All

CEU eTD Collection Review 16 Review 15 Review 14 13 Review 12/ Review 11 Review 10 Review 9 Review 8

nachalo etopust’ budettol’ko O fil’me “Stalingrad” будет начало только это "Сталинград" О фильме Praise or Scold: [Bondarchuk’sFilm: nel’zya khvalit’ Fil’m Bondarchuka: rugat’ никакой Он нельзя хвалить.ругать Бондарчука: Фильм Bondarchuk’s Stalingrad] [For Us He isFolksy: «Сталинград Бондарчука» « Бондарчука» «Сталинград простоват,«Для нас он Stalingrad «Stalingrad»: iprotiv za против за «Сталинград»: и ofWar theWorlds] [FyodorBondarchuk and mirov FëdorBondarchuk ivoyna миров война Бондарчук Федор и Foundation] House [A without fundamentaDom bez фундамента Дом без and[Ashes Diamonds] Pepel almaz i Пепел алмаз и for History] Speculating onour Respect [ istorii na nashem k uvazhenii and prochaya spekulyatsiya «Stalingrad историиуважении к нашем на спекуляция прочая и маркетинг «Сталинград»: [About Stalingrad Dlya nas onprostovat nas Dlya

Stalingrad

: : Marketing and »

Pros andPros Cons : marketing

Neither] — ]

пусть To —

Novosti Moskovskie IzvestiyaNovyye Zavtra Odnako Odnako Odnako Afisha.ru Colta 77

Gladil’shchikov Igor’ Matizen Viktor Malashenkov Il’ya Belokurova, Anastasiya (Goblin) Puchkov Dmitriy Borovkov Timur Andrey Sorokin Limonov Eduard Igor’ Gulin Koretskiy/ Vasiliy

Oct 15 Oct 16 Oct 17 Oct 18 Oct 13 Oct 13 Oct 14 Oct 14

CEU eTD Collection Review 23 Review 22 Review 21 Review 20 Review 19 Review 18 Review 17

« обратно в ади «Сталинград»: Stalingrad [Review + Trailer: « Retsenziya + treylep: «Сталинград» Рецензия +трейлер: Beauty Stalingrad ofthe [Films vyzhivaniya krasota « Fil’my nedeli: выживания» «Философы: Урок красота», «Великая «Сталинград», недели: Фильмы R Special Effects, andina [BondarchukI ne popal spetseffektami, nov Bondarchuk kontuzil сердце не попал в но спецэффектами, контузил Бондарчук Stalingrad [In theT V okopakh “Stalingrada” "Сталинграда" окопах В [On Id кино Идет народное… New T Stalingrad [FyodorBondarchuk’s novogo vremeni “Stalingrad”: geroi Staryye F герои нового времени СтарыеБондарчука: Фёдора"Сталинград" Beginning] Stalingrad theFilm [About Stalingrad Stalingrad Stalingrad ё age ё dor Bondarchuk'sdor t kino narodnoye...t kino N

Misses ational ime] ime] , »,« The Philosophers renches of renches of

] : Oldheroes for a — ] , Filosofy

»: » »,« The Great

» ] ] This is This is Just the

W C v ad i obratno v ad iobratno njur

Velikaya Velikaya inema...] eek:

ed by :

Urok Urok cerdtse

]

Gazeta Rossiyskaya Gazeta Rossiyskaya Novaya Gazeta Tribuna MK Variety Russia The Village 78

OlegKoryakin Valeriy Kichin D’yakova Yelena Mariya Bezruk Nikita Kartsev Stepanov Vasiliy Kurganskaya Nastya

Oct 11 Oct 11 Oct 12 Oct 13 Oct 11 Oct 11 Oct 11

CEU eTD Collection Review 32 Review 31 Review 30 Review 29 Review 28 Review 27 Review 26 Review 25 Review 24

s veikim3D IMAX“Stalingrad”: velikiy IMAX великий"Сталинград": Motherland] a Bride,[As Love We the lyubim Kak nevestu rodinumy любим мы невесту родину Как [Thus Tak nobedim победим Так [Silentgrad] Saylentgrad Сайлентград E [In Stalingrad’s V raskopkakh Stalingrada Сталинграда раскопках В R Germans: [Bondarchukagainst the vykhodit vprokat nemtsev: Bondarchuk protiv впрокатвыходит немцев: «Сталинград» против Бондарчук [ gradStilen град Стилен Oscar] Stalingrad. the Huntfor [Andrey Sidorchik: « « Andrey Sidorchik: «Оскара» Охота «Сталинград». на Сидорчик: Андрей Bill Nighy] [Blondes, Brunettes and Nayi Blondinki, bryunetki iBill Найи Билл брюнеткиБлондинки, и Back] [ Stalingrad Snazzy G Oskara Stalingrad xcavations] xcavations] eleased]

We AreWe Victorious

великим 3 великим

« Stalingrad rad] Stalingrad : ToHell and

. Okhota na Okhota na .

D »

]

Fakty Argumenty i Vedomosti Fakty Argumenty i Reporter The Hollywood RIA Novosti Iskusstvo Kino GQ Interfax.ru Kommersant 79

Menyshenina Yelena OlegZintsov Sidorchik Andrey Semen Kvasha Tokmasheva Mariya Nina Tsyrkun Nikita Kartsev Ziborov Nikolay Plakhov Andrey

Oct 10 Oct 10 Oct 11 Oct 11 Oct 9 Oct 9 Oct 9 Oct 9 Oct 9

CEU eTD Collection Review 43 Review 42 Review 41 Review 40 Review 39 Review 38 Review 37 Review 36 Review 35 Review 34 Review 33

[DefenseImmersed] Oborona spogruzheniyem с погружениемОборона Stalingrad [Sergey Minayev: «Stalingrad» Sergey Minayev: «Сталинград» Сергей Минаев: [ Oni srazhalis’ za Katyu сражалисьОни заКатю [300 300 po 300 по A Citadel «Oskar nazvaniyem pod Tsitadel’ «Оскар» названием под Цитадель [ Stalingrad Сталинград Technological R [In pealizma tekhnologicheskogo V zhanre реализма технологического жанреВ Stalingrad] [In theR V al’kovakh Stalingrada Сталинграда альковах В Germans] [ “Stalingrad”: inemtsy kino немцы кино "Сталинград": и [ Stalingrad: krupnyyplan план крупныйСталинград: [ Stalingrad Сталинград with Great 3D] IMAX[Stalingrad: Great Stalingrad Theyfor Fought Katya Stalingrad Stalingrad Stalingrad

the

in Stalingrad]

- - G

stalingraski сталинградски » ecesses of enre of

Entitled

]

] : Film and : AClose ]

ealism] ealism]

“

Oscar -

up]

]

”

Ekspert.ru (Ogonëk) Kommersant’ Fontanka Trud.ru Rolling Weekend Kommersant’ Vzglyad (vz.ru) Lenta.ru Gazeta.ru Novoye Vremya TimeOut.ru 80

Stone

Surikov Vyacheslav Arkhangel’skiy Andrey Igor’ Shusharin Pavlyuchik Leonid Kondukov Aleksandr Lidiya Maslova Minayev Sergey Obolonkov Sergey Lyashchenko Vladimir Galitskaya Ol’ga Denis Ruzayev

Oct 7 Oct 7 Oct 8 Oct 8 Oct 9 Oct 4 Oct 7 Oct 7 Oct 7 Oct 7 Oct 7

CEU eTD Collection Review 51 Review 50 Review 49 Review 48 Review 47 Review 46 Review 45 Review 44

прокат выходит прокат сражались:Они в gentlemen] film for respectable [ dlyagospod solidnykh “Stalingrad”: solidnyyfil’m господсолидных фильм солидный для "Сталинград": War] World Understanding a New Era in The Film [An osmyslenii Vtoroy mirovoy novuyu epokhu v « ANTICHNAYA: IDËT VOYNA мировой в осмыслении Второй новую эпохуоткрывает «Сталинград» АНТИЧНАЯ: Фильм ВОЙНА ИДЕТ [I am inpain] not Mne ne bol’no Мне не больно LittleAn Artificial World] [Bondarchuk’s – “Stalingrad”Bondarchuka мирок искусственный Бондарчука "Сталинград" Bed] [Enemyin at and the Gates Vrag uvorotvposteli i впостелии уворот Враг Video Attraction] [ videoattraktsion “Stalingrad”: eto ne видеоаттракцион не это "Сталинград": German...] is [What nemtsyChto khorosho хорошо немцу Что Stalingrad Stalingrad Stalingrad

iskysstvennyy mirok

Antique War

Good to the

Stalingrad

: arespectable No is : This »

otkryvayet -

the

Stalingrad

Fil’m

Second Second

On:

Opens

Iskusstvo Kino Gazety (ng.ru) Nezavisimoy Pravda Komsomol’skaya M24.ru Vedomosti RBK Daily RIA.ru Profile.ru (Kinoart.ru) 81

Yelena Borisova Dar’ya TyrkinStas Ivan Raspopov Anton Dolin Latysheva Marina Solntseva Alena Dmitriy Bykov Stisho va

Oct 4 Oct 4 Oct 4 Oct 4 Oct 4 Oct 4 Oct 4 Oct 4

CEU eTD Collection Review 58 Review 57 Review 56 Review 55 Review Review 53 Review 52 54

«Stalingrad» Prem’era nedeli: «Сталинград» Премьера недели: Project [This «Stalingrad»Eto proyekt «Сталинград» проект Это Stalingrad Wermacht: Briefly about Shame for[A theWhole «Stalingrade» vermakhta. o Korotko dlyaPozor vsego «Сталинграде» вермахта. всего для Позор Defended His [FyodorBondarchuk «Stalingrad» svoy FëdorBondarchuk otstoyal «Сталинград» свой отстоял БондарчукФедор Not Fail Expectati Film[The obmanul ozhidaniya Fil’m “Stalingrad” ne ожиданияне обманул "Сталинград"Фильм About theGreat War] Great[Another Movie velikoy voyne Eshchëfil’m o odinvelikiy фильм войне овеликой великий Еще один Hell] [ preispodney Stalingrad: iz Parni преисподнейиз Парни Сталинград: R Bondarchuk’s [They fought: Fyodor Fëdora Bondarchuka vykhodit Oni srazhalis’: vprokat Бондарчука Федора«Сталинград» Stalingrad eleased]

] Stalingrad Stalingrad : Menfrom Коротко о

Stalingrad

Stalingrad St

alingrad

ons] ons]

Did

]

Radiovesti.ru Afisha Empire (Film.ru) Sobaka.ru Fontanka.ru Snob.ru Izvestia.ru 82

. ru

Anton Dolin Kuvshinova Mariya IvanovBoris Bunygin Dmitriy Vyshenkov Yevgeniy Rutkovskiy Vadim Yusipova Larisa

Oct 2 Oct Oct 3 Sept 23 Sept 28 Oct 2 Oct 2

CEU eTD Collection Review 59

[Gifts of theMagi][Gifts Dary volkhov волхвов Дары Stalingrad [Premeire ofthe Week: ]

Seance.ru 83

Denis Gorelov

Sept 19

CEU eTD Collection 177 Review 67 Review 66 Review 65 Review 64 Review 63 Review 62 Review 61 Review 60 Identifier Review Appendix B:

Original listOriginal 177

ing available as of May 31, 2015 as ofMay31, available ing

[ Stalingrad Сталинград MoneyHasn’t Come [ NE DOSHLI Stalingrad: F ДЕНЬГИДОШЛИ! НЕ ФЁДОР, Сталинград: intheBushes[Piano Royal’ vkystakh Рояль вкустах Farwell [Review of rebyata “Stalingrad”. Proshchayte, Retsenziya kfil’mu Прощайте, ребята "Сталинград". Рецензияфильму к [Saving Private Katya] ryadovuyuSpasti Katyu рядовуюСпасти Катю UnassailableFortress] [ krepost’ «Stalingrad» неприступная «Сталинград»: Stalingrad FyodorBondarchuk’s [Life,Fate: Death and Bondarchuka «Stalingrad» Zhizn', smert' isud'ba: Бондарчука Федора«Сталинград» смерть судьба:Жизнь, и [ Stalingrad Сталинград Title Review Stalingrad Stalingrad Stalingrad Stalingrad

Guys]

Table of

]

] : Fyodor, the : An ] Stalingrad

: nepristupnaya :

Fëdora Fëdora

DOR, DENGI

крепость

] ]

MegaCritic.ruReviews

http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/468196/press

84 Weburg.net Tramvision.ru Newslab.ru Publication Review Kino portal.ru) govno.com(Kg Kino Ruskino.ru Kinonews.ru Kinoafisha.ru

- - teatr.ru

- Kirill Ilukhin Kirill Chekulayev Aleksandr Mezenov Sergey Author Review Filippov Aleksey Lushchinskiy Yuriy Stepnova Svetlana Volokhov Roman Kazantsev Aleksandr

Oct 11 Oct 10 Oct 11 2013) Date Oct 8 Oct 17 Oct 22 Oct 12 Oct 7

(All

CEU eTD Collection Review 75 Review 74 Review 73 Review 72 Review 71 Review 70 Review 69 Review 68

Disgrace the Russian Land?] Land?] Disgrace Russian the [ russkoy?zemli « русской? землипосрамим Не«Сталинград»: Bondarchuk] Cinematography’s[Russian kinematografa Bondarchuk rossiyskogo кинематографа российскогоБондарчук War] [New Film aboutan Old Novoye kinoostaroy voyne войне остарой Новое кино [ tselom “Stalingrad”: i Vobshchem целом и Вобщем"Сталинград": [ Stalingrad Сталинград [ Oni Srazhalis’za Stalingrad Сталинград сражалисьОни за [ Stalingrad: Prevozmogli Превозмогли Сталинград: [ «Stalingrad» Retsenziya kfil’mu «Сталинград» Рецензияфильму к St Stalingrad Stalingrad Theyfor Fought Stalingrad Stalingrad Review of Stalingrad alingrad

: Do We Not : DoWe : Overall] ] : They » Stalingrad

: ne pocramim ne pocramim :

Prevailed

]

] ]

85 Ovideo.ru Uralweb.ru Ovideo.ru Kinokadr [email protected] Proficinema.ru Kino.myvi.ru Kinoafisha.ru

Malyukov Maxim Oleg Petrov Alyonushkina Vera Korneyev Roman Boris Grishin FainaFardo Shirokikh Anton Egorova Ol’ga

Oct 10 Oct 11 Oct 11 Oct 9 Oct 9 Oct 2 Oct 10 Oct 8