Biodiversity20assesment20study.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity20assesment20study.Pdf Foreword This report provides an assessment of biodiv ersity and socio-economic features of the Durmitor/Tara/Prokletije landscape and its surrounding area, as a basis for development of the Conservation Action Plan (CAP) and for sustainable development. A joint project team from NGO Green Home, Podgorica, Montenegro, and World Wide Fund for Nature Mediterranean Programme (WWF MedPO) coordinated the development of this report. We w ould like to thank the project sponsor Margarethe und Rudolf Gsell Foundation. The project team hopes that this report w ill be a base for future cooperation with numerous stakeholders in the Northern Montenegro Green Belt area in achiev ing biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. Northern Montenegro Green Belt Team - 2006 Acknowledgements: This report is a result of cooperativ e work of project partners and consultants. We would like to thank the WWF MedPO staff for providing support through the whole process of the report dev elopment, especially to Marco Pagliani, Cristoph Stein and Francesca Antonelli. Thanks to our consultants for CAP Pedro Regato and Serena Arduino, and to Mileta Bojovic, our GIS consultant. We also thank USAID/CHF Department for providing Biodiversity maps of Montenegro, Maja Zitkovic for editing and revising the report, and Stev an Nelevic for the cover page design. The last, but not the least, w e would like to thank all the consultants who were engaged in development of the report, and who are mentioned below. Project team: WWF MedPO: Marco Pagliani, Pedro Regato, Serena Arduino, Cristoph Stein, Francesca Antonelli NGO Green Home: Natasa Durakovic, Darko Pajovic, Gorana Miskovic, Svjetlana Mujovic Consultants and Report Authors: Danilo Mrdak, Department of Biology, University of Podgorica – fish, high mountain lakes Danka Petrovic, Department of Biology, University of Podgorica – vascular plants Vladimir Pesic, Department of Biology, University of Podgorica – butterflies Biljana Gligorovic, NGO Green Home – agriculture Dejan Iv anovic, Organisation for protection, treating and hunting – big mammals Dragan Roganovic, The Republic Institute for the Nature Protection, Podgorica –- forests Branislav Peric, Mycological Society of Montenegro, Podgorica – fungi Jelena Perunicic, Centre for Entrepreneurship and Economical Development, Podgorica – socio-economic analyses Jelena Martinovic, NGO Green Home – stakeholder and development plans CONTENT List of abbreviations and acronyms CAP Conservation Action Plan CEESP Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy CEL Commission on Environmental Law CHF Community, Habitat and Finance CITES Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species EAP Ecoregional Action Plan ERC Ecoregional Conservation EU European Union FLU Functional Landscape Unit GB Green Belt GEF Global Environmental Facility GIS Geographic Information System GTZ German Technical Cooperation IBA Important Bird Area IUCN The World Conservation Union NGO Non-governmental organisation NMGB Northern Montenegro Green Belt NP National Park MAB Man and Biosphere Programme M&E Monitoring and evaluation OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PPNDP Programme for the Protection ad Development of National Parks PPNP Physical Plan for National Parks PSR Pressure-State-Response ROSTE Regional Bureau for Science and Technology in Europe SNV Netherlands Development Organisation UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNESCO United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization USAID United States Agency for International Development WHS World Heritage Site WWF MedPO World Wide Fund for Nature Mediterranean Programme 1. Introduction 2. Project background 2.1. International background: The Global 200 2.1.1. The Global 200 map 2.1.2. WWF’s new strategic approach: Ecoregional Conservation 2.1.3. Adapting the strategy to the Mediterranean: The Mediterranean Ecoregions 2.1.4. Addressing the root causes of desertification: The Green Belt Programme 2.2. Regional background 3. Green Belt objectives 4. The Green Belt zone 4.1. The ecoregional context 4.2. Boundaries and natural units of the Green Belt zone 5. Green Belt socio-economic analysis 5.1. Introductory notes 5.2. Macro-economical settings in Montenegro 5.3. Development trends 5.3.2. Socio-demographic profile 5.3.3. Education level 5.3.4. National structure 5.4. Socio-economic profile 5.4.1. Forest exploitation 5.4.1.1. Timber production 5.4.1.2. Aromatic and medicinal plants 5.4.1.3. Bee-keeping 5.4.1.4. Hunting 5.4.1.5. Cattle breeding 5.4.2. Agriculture 5.4.3. Tourism 5.4.4. Mining industry 5.4.5. Handicrafts 5.4.6. Traffic 5.4.7. Water resource management 5.4.7.1. Rivers and lakes 5.4.7.2. Water supply 5.4.7.3. Sewage system and wastewater treatment 5.4.7.4. Hydro energy 5.4.7.5. Fishing 5.4.7.6. Bottling plants for drinking water 5.4.8. Waste disposal 6. Green Belt biodiversity analysis 6.1. Introductory notes 6.2. Biodiversity assessment methodology and criteria 6.2.1. Target species 6.2.2. Target habitats 6.2.3. Mapping and evaluation of biodiversity 6.3. Priority conservation targets 6.3.1. Target habitats 6.3.2. Target species 7. Priority Areas identification for Green Belt conservation 7.1. Biodiversity assessment results 7.2. Biodiversity scoring methodology 7.3. Priority areas identification 7.4. Priority areas and legal protection 7.5. Core zones 7.6. Ecological corridors 7.7. Transboundary issues 8. Green Belt threats assessment 8.1. Unsustainable use of natural resources by local people 8.2. Illegal hunting 8.3. Tourism pressure 8.4. Illegal construction 8.5. Air pollution 8.6. Threats emanating in the wider watershed of the Tara River basin 8.7. Waste 8.8. Soil 8.9. Forest 8.10. Species 9. Root causes of biodiversity loss 10. Strategic guidelines 10.1. Introduction 10.2. Strategic guidelines for the Green Belt Action Plan 11. A conceptual model for monitoring and evaluation 11.1. Introduction 11.2. Monitoring and evaluation of the ecoregional conservation 12. Stakeholders and opportunities 12.1. National and local public institutions 12.2. Legislation 12.3. Development plans by economic sectors 12.4. International organisations 13. Green Belt partners’ vision 13.1. Joint vision 13.2. Priority conservation landscapes in bio-geographical context ANNEXES 1. Introduction 1. Introduction The Durmitor Massif/Tara River/Prokletije Mountains is one of the most important landscapes in Montenegro in terms of its biological diversity. The significance of this area has been recognized globally, as well as at the national level by designation of protected area statuses. Durmitor National Park was declared as the UNESCO World Heritage Site (WHS) in 1980, while the larger area of Durmitor including the Tara Riv er Basin carries the designation of a Biosphere Reserve under the UNESCO Man and Biosphere Programme (MAB). The whole area has also been identified by the WWF's Forest Hot Spot Initiative as one of the 10 most important forest areas in the Mediterranean region. The landscape of Durmitor Massif/Tara River/Prokletije Mountains is part of the Dinaric Mountain range and spreads from western Montenegro to northern Albania. It is a land of mountains shaped by glaciers - the massif of Durmitor alone has 18 glacial lakes above 1,500m, and karstic phenomena, cut by deep and narrow rivers, including Europe’s longest (82 km) and deepest canyon (1,300 m) formed by the Tara River. With more than a hundred w aterfalls, springs and deep caves, the Tara River represents a natural treasure on a global scale. The region includes some of the best-preserv ed forests in south-eastern Europe. The Durmitor massif hosts one of the last virgin black pine forests in Europe - with trees 50m high and over 400 years old. Durmitor is also home to more than 1,500 plants - one third of the Montenegrin flora - many of which are rare and endemic. Further, the 255 endemic plant species of Prokletije Mountains makes this region outstanding at the European level. The whole region is a haven for large carnivores such as wolf, brown bear and lynx. Durmitor hosts 37 mammal and 163 bird species, while the presence of more than 200 bird species makes Prokletije one of the most significant ornithological areas in Europe. Moreover, the Prokletije is recognized as an Important Bird Area (IBA) at the global level. At the national lev el, this unique landscape includes several protected areas: • Durmitor National Park (32,100 ha) established in 1952; and • Biogradska Gora National Park (5,650 ha) established in 1952. The Tara River Basin in its entirety carries no designation as a protected area at the national lev el, except its outstanding canyon, the second largest canyon in the world after Colorado. The segment of the Tara canyon is included within the Durmitor National Park – meaning it is also part of the UNESCO WHS. The Biosphere Reserve includes larger Tara River Basin area with a surface of 1,823,000 ha. These globally recognized biodiversity values are subject to many threats, such as forest fires, hydro-electric power plants, excessive road construction, unsustainable tourism and ov erexploitation of natural resources (i.e. logging). Massive abandonment of pastures, agricultural lands and small villages in the mountains is in high progress since no income generating activities are motivating young generations to stay in this region. The land abandonment is resulting with the disappearance of traditional livestock grazing and cultiv ation of land. 1 - 1 1. Introduction Local environmental and development organisations and WWF MedPO have joined forces and reacted to this critical situation, setting up the Durmitor/Tara/Prokletije Green Belt (GB). The project The project “Conserving the Biological Diversity of South-western Balkans: Transboundary Nature Conservation in the Landscape of the Durmitor Massif/Tara River/Prokletije Mountains (Montenegro and Albania)”, implemented by WWF MedPO and its local partner, Green Home NGO, is part of a larger Mediterranean ecoregional conservation initiative, called “Addressing the Root Causes of Desertification: The Green Belt Programme”.
Recommended publications
  • Bijelo Polje - Kulturna Ruta 1
    20km 2.4 8 km 6.8 km 1 9 6.0 km 10 2 6 5 3 4 Bijelo Polje - kulturna ruta 1. Crkva svetog Petra 2. Gradska džamija 3. Zavičajni muzej 4. Park pjesnika 5. Kuća Rista Ratkovića 7 6. Glavni gradski trg 7. Crkva svetog Nikole u Nikoljcu 8. Stari most na Bistrici i crkva u Voljavcu 9. Selo Bistrica 10. Manastir svetog Nikole u Podvrhu novac kovan na ovim prostorima, koji je svoje mjesto našao čak i u Danteovoj Danas se tu nalazi monumentalni Crkva Presvete Bogorodice u Voljavcu, sagrađena krajem 12. vijeka, jedna je Crkva Svetog Apostola Petra Božanstvenoj komediji. Blaga numizmatičke, arheološke, istorijske, etnološke spomenik posvećen borcima od prvih zadužbina velikog župana Stefana Nemanje u ovom kraju. Crkva je Središte oko kog je prije osam stotina godina i umjetničke zbirke, smještena su u zgradi iz 1905. godine koja je i sama Narodnooslobodilačke borbe, koji bila poznata i po bogatim vinogradima, a još i danas pored nje raste čuvena počelo da se razvija i širi naselje nalazi se svojevrsni spomenik kulture. podsjeća brojne prolaznike na dugovječna vinova loza. upravo ovdje, na mjestu gdje je humski knez Drugi svjetski rat i žrtve koje je ovaj Miroslav 1196. godine podigao crkvu Svetog kraj podnio u borbi protiv fašizma. I Apostola Petra. Tipičan primjer preplitanja pola tone teška zvijezda petokraka romanske i vizantijske arhitekture, crkva je Park pjesnika Selo Bistrica Kada bi se pravila književna mapa najbolje se vidi baš sa Glavnog Idilični pejzaži ovog sela u dolini više puta prepravljana i dograđivana, da bi Crne Gore, bjelopoljski kraj, zavičaj gradskog trga.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Northeastern Montenegro
    Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 1(13) MOVEMENT POPULATION IN THE SECOND OF XX AND BEGINNING OF XXI CENTURY: THE CASE NORTHEASTERN MONTENEGRO Goran Rajovi ć, Jelisavka Bulatovi ć, Researchers College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Belgrade, Serbia E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Phone: 0038161/19-24-850, 003861/ 3082651 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes population trends northeast of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. The population has increased in the period 1948- 2003 to 2.16%, but with a tendency to decline from 1981. The population in are period 1981- 2003, decreased by 14,674, or 21.16 %. Parameters of natural population indicate a negative trend. So the natural increase in 2003 in the municipality was Andrijevica - 4.6 ‰, in the municipality of Plav 4.21 ‰, and Berane 9.29 ‰, significantly lower than in the beginning of the seventies. Population migration indicates uneven density and population concentration. The existence of a large number of settlements up to 500 populations (81) is not suitable for modern flow to vital economic development of the region. KEYWORDS Northeastern Montenegro; Density of population; Natural change; Migration. Northeastern Montenegro covers an area of 1486 km² and the population census in 2003 there lived 54 658 inhabitants, or 36.8 in/ km². It covers three municipalities: Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. The paper provides a review and interpretation of the basic parameters of population trends northeastern of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. Unlike the nineties of the last century, the population of the region during the seventies, moving out to a much lesser extent, we can explain the material well-being of the former Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Households in Montenegro Basic Information About Montenegro
    RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IN MONTENEGRO BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT MONTENEGRO Area 13.812 km2 Time zone GTM +1 Population 622.000 Largest lake Skadar Lake Climate Mediterranean Capital city Podgorica Deepest canyon Tara (1.300 m) Average air temperature 27.4oC (summer) Historical capital Cetinje National parks Durmitor, Biogradska Gora, Maximum Currency Euro Skadar Lake, Lovćen, o sea temperature 27.1 C Seacoast 293 km Prokletije Average number of Number of beaches 117 Largest bay Bay of Kotor sunny days per year 240 Lenght of beaches 73 km Swimming season 180 days Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovina Kosovo Croatia CONTENTS Albania Skadar Adriatic Sea Lake Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 North region .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Central region ........................................................................................................................................ 60 South region .......................................................................................................................................... 74 0 10 20 km Legend ................................................................................................................................................ 84 Montenegro is located in southeast Europe, on the Balkan Even though small in surface area (13.800 km2), it is Peninsula. The capital
    [Show full text]
  • Ostvarivanje Potencijala Za Zeleni Rast ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LV Broj 6 Jun 2019
    Međunarodna konferencija Zeleni dani 2019 Ostvarivanje potencijala za zeleni rast ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LV Broj 6 Jun 2019. Broj ISSN 0350-5340 Godina LV Željko Macanović Radovan Radulović Dragan Čavor poljoprivrednik iz Pljevalja Montenomaks Control & Logistics Niksen Čavor Lider u organskoj Pouzdanost, efikasnost i Njeguški prušut proizvodnji višedecenijsko iskustvo sa crnogorskih žitarica čine temelj uspješnosti farmi IMPRESUM 3 Broj 6 Jun 2019. Sadržaj Izdavač: Privredna komora Crne Gore Novaka Miloševa 29/II Podgorica 81000, Crna Gora Tel: +382 20 230 545 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.privrednakomora.me Redakcijski odbor: Predsjednica: Ljiljana Filipović Članovi: Danilo Gvozdenović, Pavle D. Radovanović, Mitar Bajčeta, Željko Baltić, Novica Bulatović, prof. dr Mladen Perazić, dr Nina Drakić, Tanja Radusinović, Zoran Nikolić Urednica: Milka Pižurica Međunarodna konferencija Zeleni dani 2019 Novinar: Igor Perović 6 Ostvarivanje potencijala za zeleni rast Prevod: Dragana Domazetović, Maja Šćepanović Drobnjak Adresa Redakcije: Privredna komora Crne Gore/Glasnik Novaka Miloševa 29/II Željko Macanović, a farmer from Pljevlja Podgorica 81000, Crna Gora 32 Leader in the organic grain production Tel: +382 20 230 439 Radovan Radulovic, executive director of Montenomaks Control & Logistics e-mail: [email protected] 40 Reliability, efficiency and decades of experience are the foundation of Dizajn: our success Privredna komora Crne Gore 60 Senad Brka, President of the Business Association „Business Centre“ Jelah-Tešanj Striving for higher quality
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Ministry of Tourism and Environment SUSTAINABLE TOURISM INDICATORS AND DESTINATION MANAGEMENT Regional Workshop Kolašin, Montenegro, 25-27 April 2007 FINAL REPORT CONTENTS Foreword by Mr. Predrag Nenezic, Minister of Tourism and Environment of Montenegro 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 3 2 SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN MONTENEGRO AND THE BJELASICA AND KOMOVI REGION ........................................................................................... 5 3 WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS AND VISITS...................................................... 11 4 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ........................................................................ 17 5 IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES AND INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN BJELASICA AND KOMOVI.............................................................. 21 6 MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT PROCESSES ........................................... 41 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE WORKSHOP............ 43 8 BASELINE INDICATORS FOR TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTHERN MOUNTAIN REGION OF MONTENEGRO ...................................... 45 ANNEX A: FORMS............................................................................................................ 49 Form 1 - Field visit evaluation sheet ............................................................................. 49 Form 2 - Situation analysis worksheet .......................................................................... 51 Form 3 - Sustainability
    [Show full text]
  • Best Hikes of Montenegro Expedition
    YOUR ECOTOURISM ADVENTURE IN MONTENEGRO Best Hikes of Montenegro Expedition Expedition description: In a small Balkan country, named for its mysterious “Black Mountains” (Monte-negro), you will find a land of rugged beauty - towering peaks, deep canyons and primeval forests. This 9-day hiking expedition aims to showcase the best trails in the most stunning surroundings - including places where few have been before! Towering mountain ridges, picturesque river canyons, pristine glacial lakes and a chance to spot some rare and endangered wildlife. Our experienced team will take you on a real adventure! Includes Komovi Massif, Biogradska National Park, wild and beautiful Mokra and Visitor – the hidden jewel of Prokletije National Park. Expedition details: Group: 3-7 people Departure dates: June 20-28, August 15-23 Fitness level required: Good Email: [email protected]; Website: www.montenegro-eco.com Telephone: +382(0)20 664 741; Mob|Viber|Whatsapp: +382(0)69 123 078 / +382(0)69 123 076 Adress: Njegoševa 9 - 81000 Podgorica - Montenegro Our team speaks English, French, German, Bahasa, Dutch and Montenegrin|Serbian|Bosnian|Croatian! YOUR ECOTOURISM ADVENTURE IN MONTENEGRO Full itinerary: DAY 1 – BIOGRADSKA GORA Arrival in Podgorica airport. Transfer to first accommodation. On the way we’ll visit Morača monastery from 13th century and stop by to marvel the beauty of the lake in the heart of Biogradska Gora National Park. Accommodation – Bjelasica area (halfboard + pocket lunches). DAY 2 – BJELASICA GLACIAL LAKES – EASY HIKE (Easy hike - mainly grassland, the very ascent with a bit of rocky terrain) Something relaxing to start the expedition on the meadows of this lovely mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Drina Euroregion
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of cross-border cooperation along the Serbian–Croatian border Drina Euroregion Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. The development of the cross-border cooperation .............................................................. 7 2.1 Establishment of the Drina Euroregion ......................................................................... 8 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 11 3.1 The Serbian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion .................................. 11 3.2 The Serbian–Croatian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................. 12 3.3 The Croatian–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion ................................ 12 3.4 The Montenegrin–Bosnian border section of the Drina Euroregion......................... 13 3.5 The Montenegrin–Serbian border section of the Drina Euroregion ......................... 14 3.6 Geographic features of the Drina Euroregion area .................................................... 15 3.7 Administrative units – members ................................................................................. 20 4. Organisational and institutional structure, operation ......................................................... 28 Assembly ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Economic Growth Project
    USAID Economic Growth Project BACKGROUND The USAID Economic Growth Project is a 33-month initiative designed to increase economic opportunity in northern Montenegro. Through activities in 13 northern municipalities, the Economic Growth Project is promoting private-sector development to strengthen the competitiveness of the tourism sector, increase the competitiveness of agriculture and agribusiness, and improve the business-enabling environment at the municipal level. ACTIVITIES The project provides assistance to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, local tourist organizations, and business support service providers, as well as municipal governments to stimulate private sector growth. The project is: Strengthening the competitiveness of the tourism sector It is promoting the north as a tourist destination by supporting innovative service providers, building the region’s capacity to support tourism, assisting coordination with coastal tourism businesses, and expanding access to tourist information. Improving the viability of agriculture and agribusiness It is restoring agriculture as a viable economic activity by supporting agricultural producers and processors from the north to capitalize on market trends and generate more income. Bettering the business-enabling environment It is identifying barriers to doing business and assisting municipalities to execute plans to lower these obstacles by providing services and targeted investment. RESULTS 248 businesses have received assistance from Economic Growth Project (EGP)-supported activities. Sales of items produced by EGP-supported small businesses have increased by 15.8 percent since the project began. Linkages have been established between 111 Northern firms, as well as between Northern firms and Central and Southern firms. 26 EGP-assisted companies invested in improved technologies, 29 improved management practices, and 31 farmers, processors, and other firms adopted new technologies or management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Series in Physical Environment 2
    Springer Series in Physical Environment 2 Managing Editor D. Barsch, Heidelberg Editors I. Douglas, Manchester' F. Joly, Paris M. Marcus, Tempe· B. Messerli, Bern Advisory Board F. Ahnert, Aachen' V. R. Baker, Tucson R. G. Barry, Boulder' H. Bremer, Knln D. Brunsden, London' R. U. Cooke, London' R. Co que, Paris Y. Dewolf, Paris' P. Fogelberg, Helsinki· O. Franzle, Kiel I. Gams, Ljubljana' A. Godard, Meudon' A. Guilcher, Brest H. Hagedorn, Wiirzburg' J. Ives, Boulder S. Kozarski, Poznan' H. Leser, Basel' J. R. Mather, Newark J. Nicod, Aix-en-Provence' A. R. Orme, Los Angeles G. 0strem, Oslo' T. L. Pewe, Tempe· P. Rognon, Paris H. Rohdenburgt, Braunschweig· A. Semmel, Frankfurt/Main G. SUiblein, Bremen' H. Svensson, K0benhavn M. M. Sweeting, Oxford' R. W. Young, Wollongong Ognjen Bonacci Karst Hydrology With Special Reference to the Dinaric Karst With 119 Figures Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Professor Dr. OGNJEN BONACCI Civil Engineering Institute Faculty of Civil Engineering Sciences University of Split 58000 Split, V. Maslese b.b. Yugoslavia Translated by Zjena Vidovic-Culic ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83167-6 e-ISBN-13: 978-3-642-83165-2 DOl: 10.1007/978-3-642-83165-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Bonacci, Ognjen, 1942- Karst hydrology, with special reference to the Dinaric karst. (Springer series in physical environment ; 2) Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Hydrology, Karst. 2. Hydrology, Karst-Dinaric Alps. I. Title. II. Series. GB843.B66 1987 551.49 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illus­ trations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and stor­ age in data banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Kolašin Turistički Vodič
    tourist guide turistički vodič www.kolasin.me BAKOVIĆA KLISURA MOJKOVAC 2 BAKOVIĆI DRIJENAK 2 ROGOBORE RADIGOJNO BABLJAK 2 BREZA Kolašin SELIŠTA BAŠANJE pješačke staze BRDO KOLAŠIN 1450 3 KOLAŠIN 1600 SCAN WITH QR hiking trails CODE READER POLJE Kolašin-Barutana-Kukunovac-Kolašin BOTANIČKA 1 BAŠTA Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l. 1 Najviša tačka: 1311 m Highest Point: 1311 m 1 DULOVINE Ukupni uspon: 369 m Total ascent: 369 m 1 1 GORNJI PAŽANJ Dužina staze: 9.75 km Trail length: 9.75 km Vrijeme potrebno za turu: 3 h How long it takes: 3 h BARUTANA 1 VLADOŠ Kolašin-Radigojno-Bakovića klisura-Kolašin PODGORICA Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l. 1 1 DURUTOVAC Najviša tačka: 998 m Highest Point: 998 m Ukupni uspon: 56 m 2 Total ascent: 56 m KUKUNOVAC Dužina staze: 8.9 km Trail length: 8.9 km Vrijeme potrebno za turu: 2 h How long it takes: 2 h Kolašin-Bašanje brdo-Kolašin Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l. Najviša tačka: 1081 m Highest Point: 1081 m Ukupni uspon: 139 m 3 Total ascent: 139 m Dužina staze: 2,4 km Trail length: 2,4 km Vrijeme potrebno za turu: 1 h How long it takes: 1 h BAKOVIĆA KLISURA MOJKOVAC 2 BAKOVIĆI DRIJENAK 2 ROGOBORE RADIGOJNO BABLJAK 2 BREZA Kolašin SELIŠTA BAŠANJE pješačke staze BRDO KOLAŠIN 1450 3 KOLAŠIN 1600 hiking trails POLJE Kolašin-Barutana-Kukunovac-Kolašin BOTANIČKA 1 BAŠTA Početak staze: 942 mnm Trail beginning: 942 m a.s.l.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001
    CG/CP (8) 5 REV Standing Committee Report on the observation of the early parliamentary elections in Montenegro, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 22 April 2001 Rapporteur : Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic) Adopted by the Standing Committee on 31 May 2001 --------------------------- At the invitation of Mr Svetozar Marovic, President of the Montenegrin Parliament, and of the Yugoslav authorities, through their Consul General in Strasbourg, the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE) was invited to observe the early parliamentary elections held on 22 April 2001. The elections were called by the President of the Republic of Montenegro on 20 February, following the People's Party's withdrawal from the governing coalition and the Montenegrin Parliament's decision to dissolve itself. At its meeting of 7 March 2001, the Bureau of the Congress decided to send an observer delegation comprising Mr Tomas JIRSA (Czech Republic, L, Head of the delegation), Mrs Ayse Bahar CEBI (Turkey, L), Mr Fabio PELLEGRINI (Italy, L), Mr Constantinos TATSIS (Greece, R) and Mrs Lea TOLONEN (Finland, R), accompanied by Mr Alessandro MANCINI and Miss Sylvie AFFHOLDER (Congress Secretariat). Meanwhile, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe had appointed six observers: Mr Andreas GROSS (Switzerland, SOC), Mrs Vera SQUARCIALUPI (Italy, SOC), Mr Lauri VAHTRE (Estonia, EPP), Mr Claude FREY (Switzerland, LDR), Mr Cevdet AKÇALI (Turkey, EGD) and Mr Pierre GOLDBERG (France, UEL), accompanied by three members of its Secretariat. The Council of Europe delegation worked closely with the election observation mission appointed by the OSCE/ODIHR and wishes to thank Mr Vulchanov, Head of the Mission, and his team for their assistance and logistical support.
    [Show full text]