Index to Articles in Radwaste Solutions (1994–2001)

Biology and Medicine Good Things Can Happen When the Public Marssim’s Impact on Decommissioning. By The Decay-in-Storage Room at the Einstein Gets Involved: Gaining Public Acceptance of Nancy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 1999: 43. Nuclear Waste Management Activities. By College of Medicine. By George Hamawy and Oh, Give Me A Home . . .: Spent-Fuel Dry Richard G. Telfer. July/Aug. 2000: 45-50. Carl Passler. Mar. 1995: 14-17. Cask Storage Update. By Nancy J. Zacha. Interim Storage Is Not Long-Term Disposal. Stakeholders Can Help: Improving D&D Pol- Jan./Feb. 2001: 48-50. icy Decisions at Rocky Flats. By Jack Hoopes. By John R. Vincenti. Oct. 1994: 71-79. Optimism for 1997: The Cal Rad Forum’s Fall July/Aug. 1999: 45-48. Radioisotopes, Medicine, and Low-Level Conference. By Nicki Hobson. Jan. 1995: 43-46. Taking Pride in Our Work—And Getting the Waste Disposal. By Rosalyn S. Yalow. Jan. Please Release Me . . .: Materials and Site Free- Word Out. By Rhonda Carpenter and Nancy 1994: 48-49. Release Issues. By Nancy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 2000: 55-59. A University Forum on LLW (Harvard, Texas 2001: 46-47. Tell Them What They Want To Know: Design- A&M, Case Western Reserve). Sep. 1995: 32-46. A Range of Colorful Challenges: A Meeting ing a Community Outreach Program. By Dar- Report from Spectrum 2000. By Nancy J. Waste Management by a One-Man Band: Man- rell M. Lankford. Jan./Feb. 1999: 50-53. aging a University and Medical LLRW Pro- Zacha. Nov./Dec. 2000: 46-51. gram. By P. Andrew Karam. Mar./Apr. 2000: Compacts Rocky Starts, Lessons Learned, Midnight 38-42. Crossroads or Dead End: LLW Disposal in the Runs, and Other Scenarios: DD&R Update. By United States. By E. Michael Blake. May/June Nancy J. Zacha. Nov./Dec. 1999: 57-60. Book Reviews 1999: 9-16. Spent-Fuel Storage: Rhetoric, But No Resolu- Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ The Design and Licensing Status of the Central tion. By Nancy J. Zacha. Sep./Oct. 2001: 54-56. Views of Repository Siting, Eds. Riley E. Dunlap, Interstate Compact Facility: An Above-Grade Michael E. Kraft, and Eugene A. Rosa. Reviewed Tackling Decommissioning/Spent-Fuel Issue in LLRW Disposal Facility. By John E. Gunning, by Domenic Forcella. Apr. 1994: 77-78, 86. Traverse City. By Nancy J. Zacha. Sep./Oct. Michael A. Sabbe, Richard F. Schulman, and 1999: 54-59. Waste Is a Terrible Thing to Mind: Risk, Radi- John H. DeOld. July 1997: 27-32. Take My Spent Fuel . . . Please! By Nancy J. ation, and Distrust of Government, by John Interim Storage Is Not Long-Term Disposal. Zacha. July/Aug. 1999: 58-59. Weingart. Reviewed by Nancy J. Zacha. By John R. Vincenti. Oct. 1994: 71-79. May/June 2001: 4. Taking Pride in Our Work—And Getting the Update on LLW Compacts and State Agencies. Word Out. By Rhonda Carpenter and Nancy Whose Backyard, Whose Risk: Fear and Fair- Sep. 1995: 24-31. J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 2000: 55-59. ness in Toxic and Nuclear Waste Siting, by Michael B. Gerrard. Reviewed by Domenic J. Toto, We’re Not in Kansas Anymore. By Nan- Computer Technology Forcella. July 1995: 39-42. cy J. Zacha. July/Aug. 2000: 4. Let’s Model It: Using Computer Simulation to Improve Waste Processing Safety. By Jerry Ward Valley: Heading for the Finish Line and Brokering Fireman. Nov./Dec. 2000: 31-33. Picking Up Speed. By Nicki Hobson. Jan. 1996: The Brokering of Radioactive Waste and the 55-58. Politics of Disposal. By Peter Pastorelle. Jan. Nuclear Waste Takes a TRIP: Electronic Signa- To DOC or Not To DOC: Managing Power 1994: 13-19. ture Technology to Revolutionize Document Tracking. By Ben Groeneveld. Sep. 1998: 20-21. Plant Decommissioning. By Nancy J. Zacha. July/Aug. 1999: 60-61. Buildings and Other Shelters Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Trans- Waste Management Goes Silver: A Report on And the Walls Came Tumbling Down . . . portation Risk Assessment Using a Geograph- the 25th Anniversary Waste Management Con- Rocky Flats Building 779 Closure Project. By ic Information System. By John E. Moore, ference in Tucson. By Nancy J. Zacha. Mark Zachary, Kelly Trice, and Tom Dieter. Gary M. Sandquist, and David M. Slaughter. May/June 1999: 58-64. Sep./Oct. 2000: 56-64. Jan. 1994: 75-76, 78. Waste Management 2001. By Nancy J. Zacha. Closing the Most Dangerous Building in Conferences May/June 2001: 54-58. America. By Greg Meyer and Doug Hamrick. All Dressed Up with No Place To Go: The Dis- What If We Lose Barnwell? By Nancy J. Zacha. Sep./Oct. 1999: 43-48. position of Spent Nuclear Fuel. By Nancy J. July/Aug. 1999: 62-63. D&D . . . and Now Demolition. By Janenne Zacha. Jan./Feb. 1999: 41-42. Where the Elite Meet. Sep./Oct. 2001: 4. Irene Harrington. Sep./Oct. 2001: 24-25. Back to the Future: 9th International High-Lev- Utilizing Tensioned-Fabric Structures for el Radioactive Waste Management Conference. Where the Utilities Go. Nov./Dec. 2000: 4. Waste Processing and Storage Facilities. By By Nancy J. Zacha. July/Aug. 2001: 48-52. The World, WIPP, and Other Waste Issues: A Tom Ruprecht. July 1994: 33-38. Decommissioning Hot Topics. By Nancy J. Meeting Report from Waste Management 2000. Zacha. Sep./Oct. 2001: 47-48. By Nancy J. Zacha. May/June 2000: 64-70. Chemistry East Meets West. By Michael D. Cavanaugh. The Importance of Radiological Data Valida- July/Aug. 2001: 50. Decommissioning/Decontamination tion. By Kendra K. Grega and LeRoy F. Wen- And the Walls Came Tumbling Down . . . rick. Mar. 1995: 28-32. Engaging and Exchanging in Connecticut: 2001 Rocky Flats Building 779 Closure Project. By ANS Executive Conference on Nuclear Facility Mark Zachary, Kelly Trice, and Tom Dieter. Decommissioning and Used Fuel Management. Communications Sep./Oct. 2000: 56-64. By Nancy J. Zacha. Nov./Dec. 2001: 40-45. Analogs and Dialogs: Integrating Natural Ana- Beneficial Reuse of Decommissioned Former log Studies into a National Confidence-Build- Exploring the World of DD&R: Big Issues, Nuclear Facilities. By Lawrence E. Boing. July ing Program. By I. McKinley and T. Tsuboya. Hot Topics, Cost Considerations, and More. 1998: 44-49. Nov./Dec. 2001: 24-27. By Nancy J. Zacha. July/Aug. 2000: 51-54. Biodecontamination of Concrete Surfaces: Oc- Bored Board? Membership and Motivation in Eyes on the Numbers: A Report on Spectrum cupational and Environmental Benefits. By Site-Specific Advisory Boards. By Richard G. ‘98. By Nancy J. Zacha. Nov./Dec. 1998: 47-52. LaMar J. Johnson, Robert D. Rogers, Melinda Telfer. Jan./Feb. 2000: 30-34. Going to the Mountain. By Hugh Curley. A. Hamilton, Lee O. Nelson, Jenny Benson, The Faces of Decommissioning and Site July/Aug. 2001: 52. and Martin Green. Jan. 1998: 28-35. Cleanup: How “People” Issues Affect Work The Good, the Bad, and the Money; Or, What’s The Big Cleanout at Big Rock Point. By Tim Progress. By Lara Harrison. Jan./Feb. 2001: Right and Wrong with Privatization. By Nan- Petrosky. Jan./Feb. 2000: 14-21. 7-12. cy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 1999: 38-40. Bit by Bit . . . Taking It Apart: The Incremen- Giving the Public Its Say: Learning Lessons The Inspector Calls: Inspection Planning, Feed- tal Dismantlement of the Rancho Seco Sec- from the DOE’s Public Participation Program. back, and Results on Decommissioning. By ondary System. By Dennis E. Gardiner and By James L. Creighton. July/Aug. 1999: 38-44. Nancy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 2001: 44-45. John M. Newey. July/Aug. 1999: 9-14. 46 Radwaste Solutions January/February 2002 Building Dismantlement and Site Remediation Decontamination and Melting of Low-Level Getting the Lead Out: Recycling and Decont- at the Apollo Fuel Plant: When Is Technology Waste. By D. W. Clements. Mar. 1997: 36-41. amination at the INEL. By Erik A. Simpson. July 1994: 49-51. the Answer? By Lewis Walton. Jan. 1995: 20-25. Decontamination of Radioactive Concrete: A Catching Up with Clearance Criteria. By Nan- Permanent Solution That’s RCRA Friendly. By Getting Pumped: Lessons Learned from the cy J. Zacha. Sep./Oct. 2001: 57-58. Michael Simmons. Jan. 1994: 25-29. Decontamination and Removal of High-Level Waste Pumps at the West Valley Demonstra- Defueling the ORNL Molten Salt Reactor Ex- Closing the Book: The Decommissioning of tion Project. By William F. Hamel Jr., Kimber- periment Facility. By Michael R. Jugan, An- the Barnwell Nuclear Fuel Plant. By Jim Mc- ly J. Mansfield, and Paul J. Valenti. Jan./Feb. Neil. May/June 2000: 55-63. drew P. Kelsey, Mahmoud H. Haghighi, and E. 1999: 5-14. Paul Larson. Nov./Dec. 1999: 35-39. Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning: Re- A Glitch Caught in Time Saves . . .: Lessons moving Restoring, and Reusing. By Michael D. Determining Endpoints for the Decontamina- Learned during Reactor D&D at Argonne Na- Cavanaugh. Mar./Apr. 2001: 59-61. tion and Decommissioning of Facilities. By tional Laboratory. By Charles R. Fellhauer. Linda Albrecht, Dennis Morgan, Louise Buk- The “Cocooning” of C Reactor: A Hanford Jan./Feb. 2000: 22-29. er, and Don Davis. May 1998: 30-34. Success Story. By John Crigler. Sep./Oct. 1999: Goodbye, Golden Goose: The Effects of Con- 29-31. DfD at Big Rock Point. By Jane Dunshee and necticut Yankee Decommissioning on the Sur- Lisa Wheat. May/June 1999: 28-30. Closing the Most Dangerous Building in rounding Community. By Terry Concannon. America. By Greg Meyer and Doug Hamrick. Dismantling the Recirculation Pump Room at Jan./Feb. 1999: 54-57. Sep./Oct. 1999: 43-48. Big Rock Point. By Janenne Irene Harrington. Handling the Unexpected: Connecticut Yan- Mar./Apr. 2001: 56-58. Cutting Edge Characterization Technologies kee’s Concrete Block Recovery Effort. By for D&D. By Steven J. Bossart and Kenneth M. DOE Pursuing Accelerated Cleanup at Fer- Richard Sexton. Jan./Feb. 1999: 58-59. Kasper. Jan./Feb. 1999: 23-30. nald. By Terry Borgman. Jan. 1996: 42-44. Hanford’s C Reactor Large-Scale Demonstra- tion Project. By James D. Goodenough and Je- D&D . . . and Now Demolition. By Janenne Doin’ the D&D: Dancing to the Regulatory remiah J. McGuire. Mar. 1997: 31-35. Irene Harrington. Sep./Oct. 2001: 24-25. Tune. By John D. Haseltine and Stephen J. Mil- ioti. Jan./Feb. 1999: 44-49. Have Pipe Cleaning System, Will Travel: Inno- The D&D Focus Area: Bringing New Tech- vative, Cooperative Effort at Big Rock Point. nologies to the D&D Toolbox. By William Economic Development at DOE Cleanup By Janenne Irene Harrington. Nov./Dec. 2000: Lupichuk. Mar./Apr. 2001: 43-47. Sites: Whose Job Is It, Anyway? By Katherine N. Probst and Amy S. Fitzgerald. July/Aug. 21-25. Decisions, Decisions, Decisions . . . Better 2000: 55-61. How to “Do” Windows: Refurbishment of D&D Decision-Making through Life Cycle Shield Windows at the West Valley Demon- The End of an Era: Decommissioning Four Analysis. By Katherine L. Yuracko, Bruce E. stration Project. By K. R. Schneider, M. J. Fiz- German Fuel Cycle Facilities. By Helmut Ru- Tonn, Michael I. Morris, and James Bogard. zano, J. L. Drake, and C. Kalkwarf. Jan./Feb. par, Roland Baumann, Peter Faber, Manfred July/Aug. 1999: 31-37. 2001: 37-40. Ruhbaum, and Helmut Schmitt. May/June Decommissioning Fort St. Vrain. By Vincent F. 2000: 28-40. Improved D&D through Innovative Technol- Likar and G. Thomas Howard. Sep. 1995: 54-60. ogy Deployment. By Steven J. Bossart and Engineering and Technology in the Deconstruc- Kenneth M. Kasper. Jan. 1998: 36-40. Decommissioning Hot Topics. By Nancy J. tion of Nuclear Materials Production Facilities. Zacha. Sep./Oct. 2001: 47-48. By Richard S. Kingsley, W. Evans Reynolds, and Innovative Technologies for Asbestos Removal Decommissioning of a Hot Laboratory and David C. Heffner. Jan. 1996: 25-31. and Treatment. By Steven J. Bossart and Ken- neth M. Kasper. Jan. 1998: 10-18. Cyclotron Complex to Green Field. By David EPRI Decommissioning Technology Program. Loughborough, Clive Hamblin, and John By Christopher J. Wood, Carol Hornibrook, Interview with Andrew C. Kadak. By David A. Asquith. Jan. 1995: 47-54. and Robert C. Thomas. July/Aug. 1999: 24-30. Schabes. Jan. 1996: 17-24. Decommissioning One, Operating Two: At San The EPRI DFD Process: Decontaminating Re- Introduction to the theme issue on DD&R: Onofre, Breaking Up Is Hard To Do. By Ray tired Components and Reactor Coolant Sys- Back to the Future, New Technologies, and In- Golden. July/Aug. 2000: 20-23. tems Following Plant Shutdown. By David novative Engineering Practices. By Neil Nor- man and Dennis Bitz. Jan. 1996: 4. Decommissioning the Quehanna Hot Cell Fa- Bradbury, George R. Elder, and Christopher J. cility. By Kenneth M. Kasper and Lee G. Pen- Wood. Sep./Oct. 2001: 16-23. Keeping an Eye on the Bottom Line. By ney. May/June 2001: 44-48. Exploring the World of DD&R: Big Issues, Michael S. Terrell. Sep./Oct. 2000: 30-32. Decommissioning “The Rock:” A Photo Tour Hot Topics, Cost Considerations, and More. Leading the Way in Community Transfer: The of the Big Rock Point Restoration Project. By Nancy J. Zacha. July/Aug. 2000: 51-54. Economic Development and Commercializa- Sep./Oct. 1999: 60-62. The Faces of Decommissioning and Site tion of Mound. By Dottie Atkins. Nov./Dec. 2000: 42-45. Decommissioning: Thinking Through to the Cleanup: How “People” Issues Affect Work End—A Perspective on the End State of De- Progress. By Lara Harrison. Jan./Feb. 2001: Marssim’s Impact on Decommissioning. By commissioning. By Russell A. Mellor. 7-12. Nancy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 1999: 43. Sep./Oct. 2001: 26-28. Fermi-1 Update: Impact of a Decommission- (Mission) Shifting Gears: How to Survive Decommissioning Trojan: A Step-by-Step Tour ing Evaluation and the Decommissioning Rule. Change. By Justin Schulz. Mar. 1995: 33-40. of a Landmark Process. By Stephen Quennoz. By Lynne S. Goodman. Nov. 1997: 45-48. Moving to Another Stage of Life: Shipping, De- May/June 1999: 17-21. The Final Chapter: Planning the Decommis- contaminating, and Final Disposition of the Maine Yankee Large Components. Sep./Oct. Decommissioning Yankee Rowe. By Kenneth sioning of the Barnwell Nuclear Fuel Plant. By 2000: 50-55. J. Heider and Russell A. Mellor. July 1994: 26, Jim McNeil. May/June 1999: 51-57. 27-32. Fostering Community Participation in De- A New Approach for the Deployment of In- novative D&D Technologies. By Lawrence W. Decommissioning’s “Father” Known Best: A commissioning. By Maureen Brown. Sep. 1998: 31-35. Vogel, Stuart L. Claggett, and John R. Duda. Profile of Decommissioning Pioneer Bill Man- May 1998: 24-29. ion. By Janenne Irene Harrington. Jan./Feb. From the Bottom Up: Tank Removal at Trojan. 2001: 41-43. By Brian D. Clark and Roger M. Lewis. A New Start for BNFL: Magnox Reactor De- Mar./Apr. 2000: 22-31. commissioning Strategy. By Paul B. Woollam. The Decontamination and Decommissioning July/Aug. 2001: 28-34. Debate. By Anthony J. Thompson and Michael Fueling Up for the Long Haul: Training for De- L. Goo. Apr. 1994: 32-41. commissioning. By Larry Boing. Jan./Feb. New Technologies in the SRS “Toolbox.” By David Yannitell. July/Aug. 2000: 28-34. Decontamination and Decommissioning of 2001: 25-27. Building 889 at Rocky Flats Environmental Getting “Fired” Up: Size-Reduction with an NRC’s D&D Regulations. By Anthony J. Technology Site. By Kent A. Dorr, Mark E. Oxy Gasoline Torch. By K. A. Szlis, K. R. Thompson. Mar. 1998: 47-54. Hickman, Brian J. Henderson, and Richard J. Schneider, S. W. Chase, J. A. Choroser, and H. Plan Ahead, Establish Support Lines, and Be Sexton. Sep. 1997: 37-40. R. Moore. Sep./Oct. 2001: 10-15. Prepared for Surprises: Lessons Learned from January/February 2002 Radwaste Solutions 47 the BNFP Decommissioning Project. By Jim tabrooks, Sheila G. Clayton, and Richard F. neth A. Broberg and Robert Janke. Sep./Oct. McNeil. Jan./Feb. 2001: 30-36. Farrell. Oct. 1994: 80-85. 2000: 19-23. Planning Ahead: Preparing for the Early Re- Journey to the Center of the . . . Vadose Zone. How Should We Clean Up the Water? Ground- tirement and Decommissioning of Oyster By Mary Beckman. July/Aug. 1999: 55-57. water Remediation Plans at the Paducah Creek. By James E. Hildebrand. Nov./Dec. Gaseous Diffusion Plant. By Gary Bodenstein 1998: 31-36. Dewatering and Mark Gage. Sep./Oct. 2000: 24-29. Planning for Decommissioning: What, How, Decide, Design, and Dewater de Waste: A Blue- Improved Cost-Effectiveness of Remedial Ac- When, and Why? By W. W. Bixby and W. J. print from FitzPatrick. By Dennis E. Robert. tion Plans at Historic Waste Sites in Canada Manion. Sep./Oct. 1999: 66-68. Apr. 1994: 21-22. Through the Use of Waste Segregation Ap- proaches. By Robert W. Pollock and Christo- Radioactive Waste Is Getting Slimed! Micro- pher H. Clement. Nov. 1997: 26-34. bial Janitors Tackle Nuclear Cleanup Problems. Editor’s Note By Deborah Hill. Nov./Dec. 1999: 54-56. The Courts Giveth . . . and the Courts Taketh In Situ Redox Manipulation: Fierce Energy of Away. May/June 1999: 4. Groundwater VOCs and Heavy Metals. By Potential Radioactive Scrap Metal Quantities Mary H. Ace. July/Aug. 2001: 24-27. from Nuclear Power Plants Worldwide. By Good Leadership, Bad Politics, and All That. Leslie A. Nieves and Roger W. Tilbrook. Jan. Sep./Oct. 2000: 4. Innovative Approaches to Environmental 1996: 45-53. Heavy Subject, Light Touch. May/June 2001: 4. Restoration at FUSRAP Opportunity Sites. By James D. Kopotic, Donald E. Dunning, Deb- Recycling and Waste Management Related to Heard in the Halls. Jan./Feb. 1999: 4. bie S. Browning, George M. Stephens, Melissa Decommissioning: German Experiences and Issues and Outtakes. July/Aug. 1999: 4. A. Kucera, and Michael E. Redmon. Nov. 1997: Concepts. By Heinz Peter Berg, Peter Wil- 16-24. helm Brennecke, and Rudolpf Görtz. Mar. It’s About Time. May/June 2000: 4. 1998: 41-46. Low Tech Meeting High Tech: Remediating Knocking About in Knoxville. Nov./Dec. 1999: 4. Two Basins Containing Radioactive Sludge at Remediating the Past and Preparing for the Fu- The New Kid on the Block. Mar./Apr. 2001: 4. ORNL. By Angie Brill, Elizabeth Krispin, ture at Sandia National Laboratories. By Lynn Whitehead, and John Julius. July/Aug. Odds and Ends. Nov./Dec. 2001: 4. Thomas L. Sanders. Jan. 1996: 32-41. 2001: 11-16. Resuming Decommissioning Activities at Fer- Random Thoughts and Musings. March/Apr. On the Lookout for Subsurface Solutions: The mi-1: Problems Encountered and Lessons 1999: 4. DOE’s Subsurface Contaminants Focus Area. Learned. By Danny Swindle, Jon Couillard, The Right Time, the Right Place. Sep./Oct. By Virginia Kay. Nov./Dec. 2000: 26-30. and Lynne Goodman. July/Aug. 1999: 15-19. 1999: 4. Putting Plants to Work: The ANL–West Phy- The Rocky Flats Challenge: Driving Worker So Much Promise . . . So Little Progress. toremediation First-Year Field Season Demon- Exposures As Low As Reasonably Achievable Mar./Apr. 2000: 4. stration. By Scott Lee. May/June 2000: 49-54. during Decommissioning. By Jennifer Thomp- Rehabilitation of the Former British Nuclear son. July/Aug. 2001: 42-47. Solutions, Solutions, We’ve Got Solutions. Jan./Feb. 2000: 4. Weapons Test Site at Maralinga in South Aus- Saving D&D $$$: New D&D Technologies at tralia, Australia. By Robert (Rob) Rawson, Still Hopeful, After All These Years. July/Aug. the INEEL. By Julia Tripp, Richard H. Meser- Caroline Perkins, and Lorimer (Lori) Felling- vey, and Ann-Marie Phillips. Nov./Dec. 2000: 2001: 4. ham. Nov. 1997: 10-15. 36-41. Stop All Waste Work Now! Nov./Dec. 1998: 4. Right in Your Own Back Yard: Onsite Dispos- Status of Chernobyl Decommissioning Efforts. Toto, We’re Not in Kansas Anymore. July/ al of Radioactive Materials. By Barry Koh. By Tom W. Wood, P. Ken Jackson, and Mark Aug. 2000: 4. Sep./Oct. 1999: 22-28. R. Morton. Jan. 1998: 19-27. We Happy Few . . . . Jan./Feb. 2001: 4. Stream Reconstruction: Designing for Natural Striking the Right CORD: Decontamination for Stream Stability. By Robert Spurling and Jason Where the Elite Meet. Sep./Oct. 2001: 4. Decommissioning at Connecticut Yankee. By Darby. Sep./Oct. 1999: 15-21. Where the Utilities Go. Nov./Dec. 2000: 4. Scott Watson, Richard N. McGrath, Horst-Otto Wetlands Restoration at Fernald: Reconstruct- Bertholdt, Edmund Friedrich, William J. Szym- ing Natural History with Ecological Restora- czak, and Ed Ruzauskas. Mar./Apr. 1999: 46-51. Environmental Remediation tion Principles. By Craig Straub. Sep./Oct. To DOC or Not To DOC: Managing Power Building on a Tradition of Environmental Con- 1999: 9-13. cern: The Evolution of Environmental Reme- Plant Decommissioning. By Nancy J. Zacha. Why and When To Use Turnkey Remediation. diation at the Savannah River Site. By W. Dean July/Aug. 1999: 60-61. By Richard H. Wilkinson. Sep./Oct. 1999: 49-53. Hoffman and Bruce Cadotte. Sep./Oct. 2000: To Decommission or Not To Decommission? 9-18. A Guide for Utilities. By Leo Lessard. Sep./ FUSRAP Oct. 1999: 32-36. The Burial Ground Complex at the Savannah The Ashland 2 Cleanup. By Bruce K. Howard, River Site: Large-Scale Remediation. By J. David J. Conboy, Michelle R. Rehmann, and A Video Look in the Pool: Spent-Fuel Charac- Michael Griffith. Nov. 1997: 35-39. terization for Dresden-1 Decommissioning. By Harold R. Roberts. Mar./Apr. 1999: 39-44. Coleman McDonough, Linwood Ray, John J. Cleaning Up Trench 1 at Rocky Flats. Sep./Oct. Villanueva, and Ed Ruzauskas. July/Aug. 1999: 1999: 38-41. High-Level Waste Management 20-23. Cost-Effective Radiological Risk Reduction: A Back to the Future: 9th International High-Lev- el Radioactive Waste Management Conference. Where Are You Going—And How Are You Remediation Case Study. By Lawrence Moos, By Nancy J. Zacha. July/Aug. 2001: 48-52. Going to Get There? Creating a Virtual Orga- Kou-John Hong, and Andrew D. Gabel. Mar. nization for Nuclear Power Plant D&D. By 1998: 62-67. Can-in-Canister Demonstration at DWPF. By Carroll Eichhorn. Jan./Feb. 2000: 52-54. Creating a Desert Oasis: Hanford Gravel Pit Nicholas H. Kuehn III, Jeffery R. Brault, David Converted to Wetland. By Todd Nelson. T. Herman, M. John Plodinec, Mary K. An- The Workings of a Waste Processor: A Rad- drews, Jeffery T. Coughlin, Poh-Sang Lam, and Jan./Feb. 2001: 28-29. waste Magazine Interview with GTS Duratek’s W. Gene Ramsey. May 1997: 20-22, 24, 26. Bob Prince. Nov./Dec. 1999: 40-42. Dedicated to Cleanup: Environmental Reme- Closing High-Level-Waste Tanks at the Savan- diation at Hanford. By Todd A. Nelson. nah River Site. By Thomas B. Caldwell, Paul D. Deep-Sea Burial July/Aug. 2001: 17-23. d’Entremont, Christine A. Langton, Jeffry L. The International Arctic Seas Assessment Proj- The End of Drum Mountain. Nov./Dec. 2000: Newman, Eloy Saldivar, Jr., and Narasimhan ect. By Gordon S. Linsley and Kirsti-Liisa Sjoe- 34-35. Rajendran. Mar. 1998: 19-26. blom. July 1994: 64-68. Ethics, the Environment, and Radioactive Waste. The Costs of Prolonging the Status Quo. By Detection By Claudio Pescatore. Jan./Feb. 2000: 49-51. Kris Sanda. May 1997: 10-12. Improvements to Alpha Continuous Air Mon- Groundwater Re-injection at Fernald: Its Role Getting Pumped: Lessons Learned from the itoring Systems at the WIPP. By H. Bates Es- in Accelerating the Aquifer Remedy. By Ken- Decontamination and Removal of High-Level 48 Radwaste Solutions January/February 2002 Waste Pumps at the West Valley Demonstra- Decommissioning the KNK Compact Sodium- Uranium Mine Cleanup in Australia. Nov./ tion Project. By William F. Hamel Jr., Kimber- Cooled Nuclear Reactor. By Werner Kathol Dec. 1998: 6-13. ly J. Mansfield, and Paul J. Valenti. Jan./Feb. and Volker Ruedinger. Nov./Dec. 1998: 17-24. 1999: 5-14. The End of an Era: Decommissioning Four Legal Issues Historical Fuel Reprocessing and HLW Man- German Fuel Cycle Facilities. By Helmut Ru- Appeals Court: DOE Must Take Spent Fuel or agement in Idaho. By Dieter A. Knecht, M. par, Roland Baumann, Peter Faber, Manfred Pay the Consequences. By Michael A. Bauser. Dan Staiger, Jerry D. Christian, C. Lee Ben- Ruhbaum, and Helmut Schmitt. May/June Sep. 1996: 15-18. dixsen, G. W. (Bill) Hogg, and Julius R. Berreth. 2000: 28-40. Courts Say Take or Pay: Litigation Related to May 1997: 35-47. Engineering for Transportation and Disposal of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Failure to Ac- Modern Alchemy: Solidifying High-Level Nu- Low-Level Radioactive Wastes in Japan. By cept Spent Nuclear Fuel. By Michael A. Bauser. clear Waste. By Christopher C. Newton. July Yutaka Suzuki, Yoshihiro Akagawa, and Hiroo July/Aug. 2000: 15-19. 1997: 42-44, 46-49. Ohno. Oct. 1994: 64-70. The Decontamination and Decommissioning A Team of Seven—The Tanks Focus Area: Pro- The IAEA Radioactive Waste Management Pro- Debate. By Anthony J. Thompson and Michael viding Technical Solutions for Cleaning Up the gramme. By Donald E. Saire. July 1994: 57-63. L. Goo. Apr. 1994: 32-41. DOE’s Radioactive Tank Wastes. By Wayne Getting It Right: New Hampshire’s State-of- Cosby. Sep./Oct. 2000: 43-49. Interim Storage of Low-Level and Intermedi- ate-Level Waste in Finland. May 1998: 18-20. the-Art Nuclear Decommissioning Law. By Vitrification at the West Valley Demonstration Bruce J. Musico and Harold T. Judd. Nov./Dec. Project. By William F. Hamel, Jr., Michael J. The International Arctic Seas Assessment Proj- 2001: 21-23. Sheridan, and Paul J. Valenti. Mar. 1998: 27-40. ect. By Gordon S. Linsley and Kirsti-Liisa Sjoe- blom. July 1994: 64-68. Wrapping Up the Leftovers: Management of Low-Level Waste Management Expended Materials Relating to the West Val- LLRW Volume Reduction in Russia: Processing “And the Train Pulls Out from . . . .” Fernald’s ley Demonstration Project High-Level Waste of Solid and Liquid Waste from Submarine Dis- Waste Pits Cleanup. By Julie Loerch and Dave Virtification Facility. By L. E. Krieger, R. DiB- mantlement. By J. H. Saloio, J. A. Jones, C. A. Lojek. Mar./Apr. 2000: 32-37. iase, W. F. Hamel, and P. J. Valenti. Mar./Apr. Aas, S. J. Simon, R. A. Penzin, and V. P. Tarasov. Assured Storage Facilities: A New Perspective 2000: 12-20. Jan./Feb. 2001: 13-19. on LLW Management. By William F. Newber- Low- and Intermediate-Level Waste Manage- ry, Thomas A. Kerr, and David H. Leroy. Sep. Human Factors ment in Spain. By Pablo Zuloaga. May/June 1995: 13-22. Human Factors in Waste Management. By 2000: 20-26. Assured Storage Integrated Management Sys- Neville Moray. Oct. 1994: 58-63. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management in tems: The Most Frequently Asked Questions. The Faces of Decommissioning and Site Korea. By In Soon Chang. July 1997: 33-37. By William E. Newberry, Thomas A. Kerr, and Cleanup: How “People” Issues Affect Work David H. Leroy. Sep. 1996: 20-25. A New Day for Radioactive Waste Manage- Progress. By Lara Harrison. Jan./Feb. 2001: ment Activities in Korea. By Myung-Jae Song Careful Operations at Envirocare of Utah. 7-12. and Chang-Lak Kim. Sep./Oct. 2001: 36-39. May/June 2001: 11-14 (Mission) Shifting Gears: How to Survive A New Start for BNFL: Magnox Reactor De- The DC Plasma-Arc Furnace: A High-Tem- Change. By Justin Schulz. Mar. 1995: 33-40. commissioning Strategy. By Paul B. Woollam. perature Solution to Waste Treatment. By July/Aug. 2001: 28-34. Ronald W. Goles, William F. Bonner, and Whit- Hydrology ney D. St. Michel. Jan./Feb. 2000: 40-43. Creating a Desert Oasis: Hanford Gravel Pit Nuclear Waste Management in Sweden. By Jan Carlsson. Nov./Dec. 1998: 25-30. The Decay-in-Storage Room at the Einstein Converted to Wetland. By Todd Nelson. College of Medicine. By George Hamawy and Jan./Feb. 2001: 28-29. The Nuclear Waste Program in the United Carl Passler. Mar. 1995: 14-17. Groundwater Re-injection at Fernald: Its Role Kingdom: An Interview with Ian Handyside. Nov./Dec. 1998: 14-15. Crossroads or Dead End: LLW Disposal in the in Accelerating the Aquifer Remedy. By Ken- United States. By E. Michael Blake. May/June neth A. Broberg and Robert Janke. Sep./Oct. Planning Ahead: Tailings Management for 1999: 9-16. 2000: 19-23. High-Grade Uranium Ores with High Arsenic The Design and Licensing Status of the Central and Nickel Content. By Arnaud de Bourayne, In Situ Redox Manipulation: Fierce Energy of Interstate Compact Facility: An Above-Grade Robert Pollock, and John Rowson. May/June Groundwater VOCs and Heavy Metals. By LLRW Disposal Facility. By John E. Gunning, 2000: 42-48. Mary H. Ace. July/Aug. 2001: 24-27. Michael A. Sabbe, Richard F. Schulman, and Journey to the Center of the . . . Vadose Zone. The Plutonium Issue: Materials Science Aspects John H. DeOld. July 1997: 27-32. of Going MOX and Alternative Solutions. By By Mary Beckman. July/Aug. 1999: 55-27. Environmentalism and Low-Level Waste—The Hansjoachim Matzke and Jacques van Geel. Notes from the Vadose Zone. By Joseph R. Aftermath. By Peter J. Pastorelle. May 1995: Mar. 1996: 71-76. Hearst, John R. Brodeur, and John G. 41-51. Post Operational Cleanout Success at BNFL Conaway. July 1994: 74-76, 78. EPRI’s Low-Level Waste Management R&D Sellafield in the United Kingdom. By E. J. A Road Map to Cleanup Success: Hanford’s Program. By Carol Hornibrook. July 1997: 14- Williamson, D. H. Norton, A. F. Hurley, and Groundwater/Vadose Zone Integration Proj- 16, 18, 20. N. P. Houghton. July 1997: 38-41. ect. By Steven P. Sautter and Geoffrey L. Har- Here’s a TIP: The Advanced Resin Cleaning vey. May/June 2001: 31-35. Radioactive Waste Is Getting Slimed! Micro- System Is Success for Grand Gulf. By Philip bial Janitors Tackle Nuclear Cleanup Problems. Theibert. Nov./Dec. 1998: 43-46. Indigenous Peoples By Deborah Hill. Nov./Dec. 1999: 54-56. Heroes for Zeros—Developing a High-Perfor- An Indian Tribal View of the Back End of the Rehabilitation of the Former British Nuclear mance Team. By Christopher A. Lewis. Sep. Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Historical and Cultural Weapons Test Site at Maralinga in South Aus- 1998: 36-39. Lessons. By Mervyn L. Tano, J. Herman tralia, Australia. By Robert (Rob) Rawson, Reuben, Donna Powaukee, and A. David Caroline Perkins, and Lorimer (Lori) Felling- Interim Storage Is Not Long-Term Disposal. Lester. Mar. 1996: 44-47. ham. Nov. 1997: 10-15. By John R. Vincenti. Oct. 1994: 71-79. A Repository on the Doorstep: Finland’s Low- Interim Storage of Low-Level and Intermedi- International and Intermediate-Level Waste Repository at ate-Level Waste in Finland. May 1998: 18-20. Analogs and Dialogs: Integrating Natural Ana- the Loviisa Nuclear Power Station. By Simon Less Means Less: Duke’s Liquid Radwaste So- log Studies into a National Confidence-Build- Rippon. July/Aug. 2000: 26-27. lution. By Tom Shiel. Nov./Dec. 1998: 37-42. ing Program. By I. McKinley and T. Tsuboya. Nov./Dec. 2001: 24-27. Stabilizing the Shelter at Chornobyl. By Marye Let the Private Sector Help. By Charles Judd. Hefty. Nov./Dec. 2001: 32-34. May/June 2000: 14-15. A Cold War Legacy: The Current Status and Challenges of Radioactive Waste Management Taking It Step by Step: Finland’s Decision-in- LLRW Volume Reduction in Russia: Processing in the Russian Navy. By John D. Gerken. Principle on Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear of Solid and Liquid Waste from Submarine Dis- May/June 1999: 31-38. Fuel. By Junahi Vira. Sep./Oct. 2001: 30-35 mantlement. By J. H. Saloio, J. A. Jones, C. A. January/February 2002 Radwaste Solutions 49 Aas, S. J. Simon, R. A. Penzin, and V. P. Tarasov. Cabbages, and Kings. By Peter J. Pastorelle. Poços de Caldas: Testing Models of Radionu- Jan./Feb. 2001: 13-19. Nov./Dec. 1998: 53-54. clide Transport Processes. By Ian G. McKinley. July 1995: 34-38. Low- and Intermediate-Level Waste Manage- ment in Spain. By Pablo Zuloaga. May/June Mine/Mill Tailings Postcards from the Past: Archaeological and In- 2000: 20-26. A Case of Customized Design: DOE UMTRA dustrial Analogs for Deep Repository Materi- Project Disposal Cell Summary. By John C. als. By Bill Miller and Neil Chapman. Jan. 1995: Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management in Lommler, Ping K. Chen, Edward Artiglia, 32-42. Korea. By In Soon Chang. July 1997: 33-37. Frank B. Guros, Barbara Bridgeman, and Low-Level Radwaste Storage Facility at Hope Steven Cox. May/June 1999: 39-50. Packaging Creek and Salem. By Larry C. Oyen, Kristen Planning Ahead: Tailings Management for IAEA Compatibility Regulations Overview. K. Lee, Richard Bravo, and Bruce Bo- High-Grade Uranium Ores with High Arsenic By Charles H. Smith. Apr. 1994: 62-65. vankovich. Jan. 1994: 71-74. and Nickel Content. By Arnaud de Bourayne, Moving the Goal Posts: Another Delay in the Robert Pollock, and John Rowson. May/June Perspectives Ward Valley Land Sale. By Alan D. Pasternak. 2000: 42-38. Decommissioning: Thinking Through to the May 1996: 44-47. UMTRA-A Learning Experience. By John E. End. By Russell Mellor. Sep./Oct. 2001: 26-28. The National Low-Level Radioactive Waste Elmer. Nov. 1996: 43-48. Planning for Decommissioning: What, How, Act: Success or Failure? By Richard F. Paton. Uranium Mine Cleanup in Australia. Nov./ When, and Why? By W. W. Bixby and W. J. July 1997: 21-26. Dec. 1998: 6-13. Manion. Sep./Oct. 1999: 66-68. On-Site Low-Level Waste Storage at D.C. Rethinking the Disposition of Hanford Tank Cook. By Walter T. MacRae. Apr. 1994: 66-70. Minimization Wastes: A Perspective. By Frank L. Parker, Donald E. Clark, and Nabil Morcos. Nov./Dec. On-Site Waste Minimization Programs at Building a Mixed-Waste Prevention Program 2001: 35-39. McGuire Nuclear Station. By Graham T. John- at Comanche Peak. By R. B. McCamey. May son. May 1998: 21-23. 1995: 21-28. The State of Affairs in the Wasteland. By Jack K. Lemley. May/June 1999: 65-66. Pennsylvania’s Community Partnering Plan. A Diablo Canyon Double Feature: When Less By John Burk. Sep. 1996: 43-46. Is Less, by Clint Miller; Consolidation of Waste We’re from the Government, and We’re Here Correlation Factors, by Clint Miller and L.T. To Help Ourselves: Low-Level Waste, the Act, Performance Assessment for Low-Level Ra- Claytor. Mar. 1996: 64-70. Cabbages, and Kings. By Peter J. Pastorelle. dioactive Waste Disposal. By James R. Cook, Nov./Dec. 1998: 53-54. Robert H. Hsu, Elmer L. Wilhite, and Andrew Four Key Elements for Radioactive Waste Min- D. Yu. Sep. 1996: 32-38. imization: Preplanning, Equipment and Facili- ties, Training. By Gene Henry. Jan. 1994: 20-24. Plutonium The Politics of Low-Level Radioactive Waste The Plutonium Issue: Materials Science Aspects Disposal. By Alan Pasternak. May/June 2001: Mixed Wastes of Going MOX and Alternative Solutions. By 16-20. The TRU and Mixed Waste Focus Area: Bridg- Hansjoachim Matzke and Jacques van Geel. Post Operational Cleanout Success at BNFL ing the Gap between Waste Inventory and Dis- Mar. 1996: 71-76. Sellafield in the United Kingdom. By E. J. posal Methodologies. By Jodi Townsend. Plutonium: Requiem or Reprieve. By K. K. S. Williamson, D. H. Norton, A. F. Hurley, and Jan./Feb. 2001: 20-24. Pillay. Jan. 1996: 59-65. N. P. Houghton. July 1997: 38-41. Solidification/Stabilization Treatability Study A Radwaste Magazine Interview: Managing of a Mixed-Waste Sludge. By Roger D. Spence Recordkeeping LLW at the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant. and Ernie F. Stine. Nov. 1997: 40-44. Informing Future Societies About Nuclear July 1997: 10-13. Responding to the New Realities: Thinking Waste Repositories. By Mikael Jensen. Apr. 1994: 53-61. A Repository on the Doorstep: Finland’s Low- outside the Box to Solve the Mixed Waste Prob- and Intermediate-Level Waste Repository at lem. By Gerald Boyd, Mark Gilbertson, Lessons from the Vatican Archives for Repos- the Loviisa Nuclear Power Station. By Simon William Owca, and Edward Rizkalla. May/ itory Recordkeeping. By Suzanne B. Pasztor Rippon. July/Aug. 2000: 26-27. June 2001: 49-53. and Stephen C. Hora. July 1994: 39-47. The Right Thing to Do. By Kathryn V. Haynes. WIPP Marker Development. By Kathleen M. May/June 2000: 16-17. Monitored Retrievable Storage Trauth. Apr. 1994: 46-52. BANANAS, Alligators, and “Hot Rocks That Safe Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste: Shoot Ghost Bullets”: Sitings Along the Path Recycling and/or Reuse Statutory Process Versus Ad Hoc Committees. to an MRS. By Vic Trebules and Dan Kane. By Donna Earley. May/June 2000: 18-19. The Ashland 2 Cleanup. By Bruce K. Howard, Apr. 1994: 23-28. David J. Conboy, Michelle R. Rehmann, and The State of Affairs in the Wasteland. By Jack The MRS and the Mescalero Apaches. By Fred Harold R. Roberts. Mar./Apr. 1999: 39-44. K. Lemley. May/June 1999: 65-66. Peso. Apr. 1994: 29-31. Fernald Scrap Metal Recycling and Beneficial Successful Closure of the Beatty, Nevada Low- Reuse. By Gerald P. Motl and Daniel D. Burns. Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility—An Natural Analogs Jan. 1994: 50-55. Industry First. By Mark S. Cade and James A Analogs and Dialogs: Integrating Natural Ana- Getting the Lead Out: Recycling and Decont- Shaffner. May 1998: 10-12. log Studies into a National Confidence-Build- amination at the INEL. By Erik A. Simpson. ing Program. By I. McKinley and T. Tsuboya. A Team Effort: Reducing the Volume of Low- July 1994: 49-51. Level Radioactive Waste. By Kerry Zimmer- Nov./Dec. 2001: 24-27. Moving to Another Stage of Life: Shipping, De- mann. Sep. 1996: 39-41. Cigar Lake: A Natural Example of Long-Term contaminating, and Final Disposition of the Isolation of Uranium. By Jan Cramer. May Time Can Change Everything: Low-Level Ra- Maine Yankee Large Components. Sep./Oct. 1995: 36-40. dioactive Waste Amid Changing Realities. By 2000: 50-55. John Weisart. May/June 2001: 22-24. Confidence-Building Tools for HLW Reposi- Potential Radioactive Scrap Metal Quantities tories: An Introduction to the Series. By Waste Management by a One-Man Band: Man- from Nuclear Power Plants Worldwide. By Charles McCombie and Ian McKinley. Jan. aging a University and Medical LLRW Pro- Leslie A. Nieves and Roger W. Tilbrook. Jan. 1995: 26-31. gram. By P. Andrew Karam. Mar./Apr. 2000: 1996: 45-53. 38-42. The Fossil Nuclear Reactors of Oklo, Gabon. Recycling Hits the Big Time: Reactor Coolant By John Smellie. Mar. 1995: 18-27. Waste Volume Modeling for a New LLRW Pump Decontamination and Refurbishment at Disposal Facility in Illinois. By Thomas W. Natural Analogs for Yucca Mountain. By Oconee. By Tom Shiel. Jan./Feb. 2000: 44-48. Ortciger, Michael E. Klebe, and Paul Corpstein. William M. Murphy. Nov. 1995: 44-50. Recycling the Cotter Concentrate. By Colleen May 1998: 13-17. Natural Cements: How Can They Help Us T. O’Laughlin, Michelle R. Rehmann, Harold We’re from the Government, and We’re Here Safely Dispose of Radioactive Waste? By W. R. Roberts, and Peter A. Sanders. Mar./Apr. to Help Ourselves: Low-Level Waste, the Act, Russell Alexander. Sep. 1995: 61-69. 1999: 58-66. 50 Radwaste Solutions January/February 2002 The Risk of CERCLA Liability Associated Robotic Inspection of Nuclear Waste Storage Spent-Fuel Storage with DOE-Generated Scrap Metal. By J. Facilities. By Ron Fulbright and Larry M. All Dressed Up with No Place To Go: The Dis- Michael Sowinski Jr. Mar./Apr. 2001: 48-55. Stephens. Nov. 1995: 36-43. position of Spent Nuclear Fuel. By Nancy J. Robotic System Cleans Underground Storage Zacha. Jan./Feb. 1999: 41-42. Reduction Tank at Oak Ridge. By S. Dirk Van Hoesen, Appeals Court: DOE Must Take Spent Fuel or Decreasing Dry Active Waste Generation by Cavanaugh S. Mims, and Barry L. Burks. Mar. Pay the Consequences. By Michael A. Bauser. 50% in One Year. By Steven M. Lorenz. Sep. 1998: 55-61. Sep. 1996: 15-18. 1995: 47-49. Robotics Down on the (Tank) Farm. By Business as Usual . . . Only More So. By Nan- An Operating Philosophy for Volume Reduc- Michele Gerber. Mar./Apr. 1999: 21-25. cy J. Zacha. Nov./Dec. 2001: 9-14. tion. By Frederic J. Mís. Apr. 1994: 42-45. Robots Provide Valuable Tools for Waste Pro- Cost-Saving Potential for Transport and Storage Waste Reduction at the Source—The Next cessing at Millstone Nuclear Power Station. By of Spent Nuclear Fuel Available from Burnup Step. By Katie Redd and Tracy Barker. Sep. Kirk Miles and Kathy Volpe. Mar. 1997: 28-30. Credit. By William H. Lake. Sep. 1997: 35-36. 1995: 50-53. The Visual and Radiological Inspection of a The Costs of Prolonging the Status Quo. By Pipeline Using a Teleoperated Pipe Crawler. By Kris Sanda. May 1997: 10-12. Regulatory Issues Robert F. Fogle, Kevin Kuelske, and Robert A. Catching Up with Clearance Criteria. By Nan- Kellner. July 1996: 42-49. Courts Say Take or Pay: Litigation Related to cy J. Zacha. Sep./Oct. 2001: 57-58. the U.S. Department of Energy’s Failure to Ac- WRAPping It Up at Hanford. By Bryan Kid- cept Spent Nuclear Fuel. By Michael A. Bauser. Cutting the Gordian Knot That Binds WIPP: der and Mark French. Mar./Apr. 1999: 15-19. July/Aug. 2000: 15-19. Sampling and Analysis to Validate Acceptable Does Utility Spent Fuel Storage Affect Local Knowledge on LANL Transuranic, Heteroge- Sampling Property Values? By William C. Metz, Tim Al- neous, Debris Waste. By Stanley T. Kosiewicz, The Importance of Radiological Data Valida- lison, and David E. Clark. May 1997: 27-33. Daniel I. Michael, Paul K. Black, Inez Triay, tion. By Kendra K. Grega and LeRoy F. Wen- and Lawrence A. Souza. Mar./Apr. 2000: 55-64. rick. Mar. 1995: 28-32. The Evolution of Spent-Fuel Waste Packages: Designing the Means to Permanently Dispose of Doin’ the D&D: Dancing to the Regulatory Notes from the Vadose Zone. By Joseph R. U.S. High-Level Nuclear Waste. By Hugh Ben- Tune. By John D. Haseltine and Stephen J. Mil- Hearst, John R. Brodeur, and John G. ton and Judy Connell. Mar./Apr. 2001: 34-42. ioti. Jan./Feb. 1999: 44-49. Conaway. July 1994: 74-76, 78. The Inspector Calls: Inspection Planning, A Forum on the MPC: The Independent Re- Feedback, and Results on Decommissioning. Siting view Group’s Comments on the MPC, by John By Nancy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 2001: 44-45. Informing Future Societies About Nuclear A. Vincent; The Nuclear Waste Technical Re- view Board’s View’s on the MPC, by Dennis L. License Termination, Unrestricted Release Cri- Waste Repositories. By Mikael Jensen. Apr. 1994: 53-61. Price; The NRC Perspective on the MPC, by teria, and More: A Radwaste Magazine Inter- Robert M. Bernero; The MPC System Evalua- view. Jan./Feb. 1999: 20-22. Radioisotopes, Medicine, and Low-Level tion Report, Oct. 1994: 34-49. Waste Disposal. By Rosalyn S. Yalow. Jan. NRC’s D&D Regulations. By Anthony J. 1994: 48-49. Occupational Radiation Dose Assessment for Thompson. Mar. 1998: 47-54. a Non-Site-Specific Spent-Fuel Storage Facili- The Volunteer Approach: A Siting Partnership. Please Release Me . . . : Materials and Site Free- ty. By Jennifer Hadley and Robert G. Eble, Jr. By Domenic Forcella and Ronald E. Gingerich. Release Issues. By Nancy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. Mar. 1998: 10-18. Jan. 1994: 30-35. 2001: 46-47. Oh, Give Me A Home . . .: Spent-Fuel Dry Ward Valley and the Federal Low-Level Ra- Radiation Exposure: Overcoming Vested In- Cask Storage Update. By Nancy J. Zacha. dioactive Waste Policy Act. By Alan D. Paster- terests That Block Good Science. By Stanley E. Jan./Feb. 2001: 48-50. nak. Mar. 1996: 39-43. Logan. Mar./Apr. 2000: 50-54. On-Site Dry Spent-Fuel Storage: Becoming Ward Valley: Heading for the Finish Line and Staged Licensing and the Need to Assure Issue More of a Reality. By Betsy Tompkins. Jan. Picking Up Speed. By Nicki Hobson. Jan. 1996: 1994: 63-70. Closure in New NRC Regulations for Licens- 55-58. ing the Yucca Mountain Repository. By F. Stan- The Owl Creek Energy Project—A Solution for WIPP Marker Development. By Kathleen M. ley Echols. July 1998: 10-14. Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel. By Ivan F. Stu- Trauth. Apr. 1994: 46-52. Streamlining the NRC’s Waste Management art and Robert O. Anderson. Sep. 1998: 26-30. Program. By Margaret V. Federline. Mar. 1996: Private Fuel Storage: Finding Real Solutions for 55-58. Soil Processing Air Classification Methods at the Nevada Test Centralized Spent-Fuel Storage. By Scott WIPP Certification: A DOE Success Story. By Site. By Mark J. Harper, Martin E. Nelson, and Northard. Jan./Feb. 2000: 35-39. George E. Dials. Jan./Feb. 1999: 15-19. Andrew D. Buckon. Oct. 1994: 28-32. Postirradiation Fuel Assembly Dimensions for Building Dismantlement and Site Remediation Transportation and Storage Cask Designs. By Reprocessing at the Apollo Fuel Plant: When Is Technology Douglas A. Williamson. Jan. 1994: 42-47. Taking Another Look at Reprocessing: Design the Answer? By Lewis Walton. Jan. 1995: 20-25. Regulating Dry Cask Storage. A Radwaste So- Considerations for New Facilities. By Ted Bre- lutions Interview with Susan Shankman and itmayer. Sep./Oct. 2001: 49-53. In Situ Redox Manipulation: Fierce Energy of Groundwater VOCs and Heavy Metals. By Randy Hall. July/Aug. 2000: 10-14. Mary H. Ace. July/Aug. 2001: 24-27. Robotics and Remote Systems Removing the K-Basins Fuel: Down Payment Bringing Robotics Technology Down to Earth. Processing Plutonium-Contaminated Soil on on Protecting the Columbia River. By Michele By Brian R. Fuller. Mar. 1997: 23-27. Johnston Atoll. By Kathleen Moroney, John Gerber. Mar./Apr. 2001: 8-24. Moroney III, John Turney, and Nels Johnson. Status of the U.S. Foreign Research Reactor Konan to the Rescue. By Eric Shen, Eric Ger- July 1994: 69-73, 91-92. ber, and Judith Graybeal. Mar./Apr. 1999: 7-14. Spent Nuclear Fuel Program. By Kenneth C. Putting Plants to Work: The ANL-West Phy- Chasey, Ibrahim H. Zeitoun, and Elizabeth Radioactive Waste Sampling Supports Process- toremediation First-Year Field Season Demon- Saris. May 1997 14-19. ing. By Thomas A. Nance. Mar. 1997: 18-22. stration. By Scott Lee. May/June 2000: 49-54. Spent Fuel Management at the Northern States Remote Automatic Control Scheme for Plasma A Road Map to Cleanup Success: Hanford’s Power Company. By John Closs and Lon Arc Cutting of Contaminated Waste. By Aed Groundwater/Vadose Zone Integration Proj- Kress. May 1996: 25-29. M. Dudar, Clyde R. Ward, and Eric M. Kri- ect. By Steven P. Sautter and Geoffrey L. Har- Spent-Fuel Storage: Rhetoric, But No Resolu- ikku. Jan. 1994: 56-62. vey. May/June 2001: 31-35. tion. By Nancy J. Zacha. Sep./Oct. 2001: 54-56. A Remotely Operated Tank Waste Retrieval Status of the Multipurpose Canister Project. By System for ORNL. By B. L. Burks, D. D. Fal- Spent-Fuel Processing J. Pat Hopper. Mar. 1996: 32-38. ter, R. L. Glassell, S. D. Van Hoesen, M. A. EBR-II Spent Fuel Treatment Demonstration Johnson, P. D. Lloyd, and J. D. Randolph. Mar. Project Status. By Robert W. Benedict and Take My Spent Fuel . . . Please! By Nancy J. 1997: 10-16. Harold F. McFarlane. July 1998: 23-27, 30. Zacha. July/Aug. 1999: 58-59. January/February 2002 Radwaste Solutions 51 Transport of Spent Fuel from Reactors to DOE IAEA Compatibility Regulations Overview. The Contract Reform Initiative at the U.S. De- Storage/Disposal Facilities—A Parametric By Charles H. Smith. Apr. 1994: 62-65. partment of Energy. By Jerry L. Bellows. Nov. Study. By E. R. Johnson and P. M. Saverot. Sep. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation 1995: 22-26. 1997: 27-30. Safety History. By James D. McClure. Sep. Courts Say Take or Pay: Litigation Related to The Universal MPC System: The Evolution of 1997: 22-25. the U.S. Department of Energy’s Failure to Ac- NAC Spent-Fuel Technology. By Bill Lee and The National Transportation Program and cept Spent Nuclear Fuel. By Michael A. Bauser. Doug Walker. Sep. 1997: 31-34. Three-Tier Planning. By Kelvin J. Kelkenberg, July/Aug. 2000: 15-19. Paul T. Dickman, Judith A. Holm, and Glenda The D&D Focus Area: Bringing New Tech- Stewardship E. Oakley. Sep. 1998: 15-19. nologies to the D&D Toolbox. By William Long-Term Stewardship—Part I: The Nature Lupichuk. Mar./Apr. 2001: 43-47. of the Problem. July/Aug. 2000: 35-44. Postirradiation Fuel Assembly Dimensions for Transportation and Storage Cask Designs. By The DC Plasma-Arc Furnace: A High-Tem- Long-Term Stewardship—Part II: Analysis and Douglas A. Williamson. Jan. 1994: 42-47. perature Solution to Waste Treatment. By Planning. Sep./Oct. 2000: 34-42. Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Trans- Ronald W. Goles, William F. Bonner, and Whit- portation Risk Assessment Using a Geograph- ney D. St. Michel. Jan./Feb. 2000: 40-43. Technology Notes ic Information System. By John E. Moore, Ceramicrete Radioactive Waste Forms—The DOE’s Decommissioning Policy and Frame- Gary M. Sandquist, and David M. Slaughter. New Kid on the Block. By Arun S. Wagh and work. By Stephen Warren, Jann Buller, and Tra- Jan. 1994: 75-76, 78. Dileep Singh. Jan. 1998: 46-49. cie Gross. Mar. 1996: 82-88. Risk Assessments for Transporting Radioactive First Simulation of PID Controller Helps Val- Emerging Technologies for Environmental Material within Idaho. By Cindy Deng, Steven idate New Hazardous Waste Treatment Tech- Characterization and Monitoring. By Paul W. Oberg, Jerry Downs, Douglas Wells, and Ven- nique. May 1998: 35-37. Wang, Caroline B. Purdy, and Eric M. Light- na Murray. July 1996: 23-26. ner. Nov. 1996: 27-34. MICROBasix Dry Active Radioactive Waste Safe from Start to Finish: The 1100-Mile Jour- Reduction System. By John B. Steward. An Industry Response to Recycle 2000. By Ger- ney of the Yankee Rower Reactor Pressure Ves- July/Aug. 2001: 53-56. ald P. Motl and Val Loiselle. Mar. 1996: 59-63. sel. By Leo Lessard. Mar./Apr. 2000: 44-49. Robotics and Virtual Reality System to Help Managing the DOE’s Weapons Program Legacy: Shipping Saxton’s Large Components. By Stabilize the Chernobyl-4 Reactor. May 1998: The Role of the Efficient Separations and Pro- James E. Hildebrand. Sep./Oct. 1999: 63-65. 39-40. cessing Crosscutting Program in S&P Initiatives. Shipping TRU Waste in Today’s Regulatory By Alexander Livnat. July/Aug. 2001: 35-41. Solucorp and BNL Tackle Mixed Radwaste Climate. By Wesley G. Estill and David L. Lan- Problems. May 1998: 41. The Nuclear Materials Focus Area: Meeting gley. Sep. 1998: 8-10, 12-14. End-User Needs through Technology Devel- Well Simultaneously Samples Groundwater The Shoreham to Limerick Fuel Transfer Proj- opment and Deployment. By Elizabeth Thiel. and Soil Vapor. May 1998: 38. ect. By Rich Wolters, Kevin Theriault, and Bob Sep./Oct. 2001: 40-46. Jones. Oct. 1994: 19-26. Training Nuclear Waste and Radioactive Cleanup: An Fueling Up for the Long Haul: Training for De- Smooth Shipping: Mitigating and Avoiding Issue that Won’t Stay Buried. By Don commissioning. By Larry Boing. Jan./Feb. Conflict in Shipping Radioactive Waste. By Mausshardt. May 1996: 39-43. Ellen L. Watson. Mar./Apr. 1999: 33-38. 2001: 25-27. On the Lookout for Subsurface Solutions: The HAMMERing It Out: Training As Real As It Transport of Spent Fuel from Reactors to DOE DOE’s Subsurface Contaminants Focus Area. Gets. By Jean McKenna, Karin Nickola, and Storage/Disposal Facilities—A Parametric By Virginia Kay. Nov./Dec. 2000: 26-30. Study. By E. R. Johnson and P. M. Saverot. Sep. Richard N. Smith. Jan./Feb. 2000: 8-12. The Risk of CERCLA Liability Associated 1997: 27-30. How to HAMMER Home Hazardous Materi- with DOE-Generated Scrap Metal. By J. als Training. By June Ollero. Oct. 1994: 50-57. Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the High Michael Sowinski Jr. Mar./Apr. 2001: 48-55. Flux Beam Reactor. By Michael Holland, Status of the U.S. Foreign Research Reactor The Electronic Teacher: Considerations for Im- Joseph Carelli, and Thomas Shelton. Jan. 1998: Spent Nuclear Fuel Program. By Kenneth C. plementation of a Computer-Based Training Pro- 41-45. gram. By Mike Nolan. Nov./Dec. 2000: 16-20. Chasey, Ibrahim H. Zeitoun, and Elizabeth Transporting Large Volumes of Residual Ra- Saris. May 1997: 14-19. dioactive Material: FUSRAP Solutions. By Transportation A Team of Seven—The Tanks Focus Area: Pro- Tammy Pressnell, Preston McDaniel, and Jason A Commentary on the 1995 DOT/NRC viding Technical Solutions for Cleaning up the Darby. Sep. 1997: 15-19. Amendments to the U.S. Nuclear Transporta- DOE’s Radioactive Tank Wastes. By Wayne tion Regulations. By Al Grella. July 1996: 31-34. Transportation of Radioactive Materials Is En- Cosby. Sep./Oct. 2000: 43-49. vironmentally Benign—Let’s Quit Analyzing Communicating Safety Every Step of the Way: The TRU and Mixed Waste Focus Area: Bridg- What We Have Learned from the Public. By It to Death. By L. G. Blalock and L. H. Har- mon. July 1996: 38-41. ing the Gap between Waste Inventory and Dis- Ann S. Bisconti. Sep. 1997: 20-21. posal Methodologies. By Jodi Townsend. Compliance Concerns in the U.S. with the New The Universal MPC System: The Evolution of Jan./Feb. 2001: 20-24. DOT/NRC Shipping Regulations. By Clint NAC Spent-Fuel Technology. By Bill Lee and Doug Walker. Sep. 1997: 31-34. Waste Management Policy Development from Miller and Michael Wang. Sep. 1997: 10-12, 14. the AEC to the DOE. By James E. Dieckhon- Cost-Saving Potential for Transport and Storage Waste Maximization: Economical Use of Rail- er. Mar. 1996: 48-54. of Spent Nuclear Fuel Available from Burnup road Transport. By Kenneth M. Grumski. Nov./Dec. 2001: 16-20. Credit. By William H. Lake. Sep. 1997: 35-36. Argonne Cruisin’ Up the River: The Final Journey of the Waste Not, Spend Not: The PUREX Radioac- Fueling Up for the Long Haul: Training for De- Trojan Reactor Vessel. Nov./Dec. 1999: 48-53. tive Nitric Acid Shipping Campaign. By H. R. commissioning. By Larry Boing. Jan./Feb. Penn, W. G. Jasen, and R. A. Duncan. July 2001: 25-27. DOE/EPRI Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Transfer 1996: 16-22. System. By Mikal A. McKinnon, Leroy Stew- Getting It Right At Weldon Spring. By Mar- ard, David C. Koelsch, Albert Machiels, and garet MacDonell, Mary Picel, and John Peter- U.S. Department of Energy Dennis A. Brown. July 1998: 19-21. son. Nov. 1996: 12-18. Engineering for Transportation and Disposal of General A Glitch Caught in Time Saves . . .: Lessons Low-Level Radioactive Wastes in Japan. By Bored Board? Membership and Motivation in Learned During Reactor D&D at Argonne Na- Yutaka Suzuki, Yoshihiro Akagawa, and Hiroo Site-Specific Advisory Boards. By Richard G. tional Laboratory. By Charles R. Fellhauer. Ohno. Oct. 1994: 64-70. Telfer. Jan./Feb. 2000: 30-34. Jan./Feb. 2000: 22-29. Forty-Year-Old Reactive Mixed Waste from The Characterization, Monitoring, and Sensor Putting Plants to Work: The ANL-West Phy- Historic Reactor Is Transported Without Technology Crosscutting Program. By Jerry J. toremediation First-Year Field Season Demon- Mishap. By Charlie G. Dietz. July 1996: 35-37. Lorenz. May/June 2001: 38-43. stration. By Scott Lee. May/June 2000: 49-54. 52 Radwaste Solutions January/February 2002 Fernald Integrated Demonstrations Provide Quick So- Lynn Whitehead, and John Julius. July/Aug. And the Train Pulls Out from . . . .” Fernald’s lutions to Problems of Defense Waste. By 2001: 11-16. Ronald C. Eschenbaum and Felicia R. La Waste Pits Cleanup. By Julie Loerch and Dave Radwaste Source Control By Surgical Strike— Lojek. Mar./Apr. 2000: 32-37. Barge. July 1994: 52-56. A Cost-Effective Strategy. By Dale D. Huff, Breaking the Mold: FERMCO and the DOE Konan to the Rescue. By Rick Shen, Eric Ger- John D. Long, and Alex A. M. C. Naudts. Nov. Embrace Contract Reform. By Jeffrey Ritchie. ber, and Judith Graybeal. Mar./Apr. 1999: 7-14 1996: 20-26. Nov. 1995: 27-30. Removing the K-Basins Fuel: Down Payment A Remotely Operated Tank Waste Retrieval DOE Pursuing Accelerated Cleanup at Fer- on Protecting the Columbia River. By Michele System for ORNL. By B. L. Burks, D. D. Fal- nald. By Terry Borgman. Jan. 1996: 42-44. Gerber. Mar./Apr. 2001: 8-24. ter, R. L. Glassell, S. D. Van Hoesen, M. A. Johnson, P. D. Lloyd, and J. D. Randolph. Mar. Rethinking the Disposition of Hanford Tank Fernald Scrap Metal Recycling and Beneficial 1997: 10-16. Reuse. By Gerald P. Motl and Daniel D. Burns. Wastes: A Perspective. By Frank L. Parker, Jan. 1994: 50-55. Donald E. Clark, and Nabil Morcos. Nov./Dec. Robotic System Cleans Underground Storage 2001: 35-39. Tank at Oak Ridge. By S. Dirk Van Hoesen, Fernald’s New Enriched Uranium Repackag- Cavanaugh S. Mims, and Barry L. Burks. Mar. A Road Map to Cleanup Success: Hanford’s ing Station. Nov./Dec. 2001: 28-31. 1998: 55-61. Groundwater/Vadose Zone Integration Proj- Full Speed Ahead at Fernald. By Kathy Gra- ect. By Steven P. Sautter and Geoffrey L. Har- Stream Reconstruction: Designing for Natural ham. Mar./Apr. 1999: 26-32. vey. May/June 2001: 31-35. Stream Stability. By Robert Spurling and Jason Darby. Sep./Oct. 1999: 15-21. Groundwater Re-injection at Fernald: Its Role Robotics Down on the (Tank) Farm. By in Accelerating the Aquifer Remedy. By Ken- Michele Gerber. Mar./Apr. 1999: 21-25. Technology and Teamwork Equal Empty neth A. Broberg and Robert Janke. Sep./Oct. Tanks. By Belinda Schwart and Karen Billings- 2000: 19-23. Saving Millions by Saving Time. By Jean ley. Sep. 1998: 22-25. McKenna. Jan./Feb. 1999: 31-34. A Project for the Birds: The Habitat Area Proj- ect at Fernald. By Eric Woods and Gary Steg- The Ultimate Hanford Challenge. By Mike Paducah ner. Jan./Feb. 1999: 35-36. Berriochoa. May 1996: 18-24. The End of Drum Mountain. Nov./Dec. 2000: 34-35. Wetlands Restoration at Fernald: Reconstruct- Vitrifying the Hanford Tank Wastes: New Team, New Vision, New Energy. By Sue ing Natural History with Ecological Restora- How Should We Clean Up the Water? Ground- Kuntz. May/June 2001: 26-30. tion Principles. By Craig Straub. Sep./Oct. water Remediation Plans at the Paducah 1999: 9-13. WRAPping It Up at Hanford. By Bryan Kid- Gaseous Diffusion Plant. By Gary Bodenstein der and Mark French. Mar./Apr. 1999: 15-19. and Mark Gage. Sep./Oct. 2000: 24-29. Hanford Cleaning Up Hanford: The Environmental Re- INEEL Rocky Flats search Project. By Linda K. McClain and Getting the Lead Out: Recycling and Decont- And the Walls Came Tumbling Down . . . Joseph F. Nemec. Nov. 1996: 36-41. amination at the INEL. By Erik A. Simpson. Rocky Flats Building 779 Closure Project. By July 1994: 49-51. Mark Zachary, Kelly Trice, and Tom Dieter. The “Cocooning” of C Reactor: A Hanford Sep./Oct. 2000: 56-64. Success Story. By John Crigler. Sep./Oct. 1999: In Situ Buried Waste Stabilization Technolo- Cleaning Up Trench 1 at Rocky Flats. Sep./Oct. 29-31. gies at INEEL. By Guy G. Loomis, Richard K. Farnsworth, and Jim J. Jessmore. July 1998: 1999: 38-41. Creating a Desert Oasis: Hanford Gravel Pit 38-43. Closing the Most Dangerous Building in Converted to Wetland. By Todd Nelson. America. By Greg Meyer and Doug Hamrick. Jan./Feb. 2001: 28-29. Journey to the Center of the . . . Vadose Zone. By Mary Beckman. July/Aug. 1999: 55-27. Sep./Oct. 1999: 43-48. Dedicated to Cleanup: Environmental Reme- Decontamination of Radioactive Concrete: A diation at Hanford. By Todd A. Nelson. Nuclear Waste Takes a TRIP: Electronic Signa- Permanent Solution That’s RCRA Friendly. By July/Aug. 2001: 17-23. ture Technology to Revolutionize Document Tracking. By Ben Groeneveld. Sep. 1998: 20-21. Michael Simmons. Jan. 1994: 25-29. Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Performance Test of a Gamma/Neutron Map- Eyes on the Numbers: A Report on Spectrum the Hanford Waste Tanks. By Elizabeth Heast- ‘98. By Nancy J. Zacha. Nov./Dec. 1998: 47-52. on, Jim Poppiti, Herb Sutter, Dan Knutson, and per on TRU Waste Drums. By Robert J. Gehrke Maureen Hunemuller. Nov./Dec. 1999: 27-34. and Nicholas E. Josten. May 1996: 48-53. 100 and Counting: Rocky Flats is the Nation’s Top Shipper to WIPP. May/June 2001: 36-37. The Good, the Bad, and the Money; Or, What’s Saving D&D $$$: New D&D Technologies at Right and Wrong with Privatization. By Nan- the INEEL. By Julia Tripp, Richard H. Meser- Stakeholders Can Help: Improving D&D Pol- cy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 1999: 38-40. vey, and Ann-Marie Phillips. Nov./Dec. 2000: icy Decisions at Rocky Flats. By Jack Hoopes. 36-41. July/Aug. 1999: 45-48. HAMMERing It Out: Training As Real As It Gets. By Jean McKenna, Karin Nickola, and The Rocky Flats Challenge: Driving Worker Mound Richard N. Smith. Jan./Feb. 2000: 8-12. Exposures As Low As Reasonably Achievable Leading the Way in Community Transfer: The During Decommissioning. By Jennifer Thomp- Hanford: Evolution of a Dinosaur. By John Economic Development and Commercializa- son. July/Aug. 2001: 42-47. Fulton. Nov. 1995: 31-35. tion of Mound. By Dottie Atkins. Nov./Dec. 2000: 42-45. Hanford Environmental Restoration Disposal Sandia Facility: An Operation and Privatization Suc- Remediating the Past and Preparing for the Fu- cess. By Joel A. Eacker and Vernon Dronen. Nevada Test Site ture at Sandia National Laboratories. By July 1998: 32-37. Air Classification Methods at the Nevada Test Thomas L. Sanders. Jan. 1996: 32-41. Site. By Mark J. Harper, Martin E. Nelson, and Hanford’s C Reactor Large-Scale Demonstra- Andrew D. Buckon. Oct. 1994: 28-32. tion Project. By James D. Goodenough and Je- Savannah River remiah J. McGuire. Mar. 1997: 31-35. Building on a Tradition of Environmental Con- ORNL cern: The Evolution of Environmental Reme- Hanford’s Latest Achievements: Mixer Pump Defueling the ORNL Molten Salt Reactor Ex- diation at the Savannah River Site. By W. Dean and New Long-Term Waste Treatment Plans. periment Facility. By Michael R. Jugan, An- Hoffman and Bruce Cadotte. Sep./Oct. 2000: By Harry D. Harmon and Marilyn C. Druby. drew P. Kelsey, Mahmoud H. Haghighi, and E. 9-18. Jan. 1994: 36-41. Paul Larson. Nov./Dec. 1999: 35-39. The Burial Ground Complex at the Savannah How to HAMMER Home Hazardous Materi- Isotopes Facilities Deactivation Project at ORNL. River Site: Large-Scale Remediation. By J. als Training. By June Ollero. Oct. 1994: 50-57. By Robert E. Eversole. Nov. 1997: 49-57. Michael Griffith. Nov. 1997: 35-39. In Situ Redox Manipulation: Fierce Energy of Low Tech Meeting High Tech: Remediating Cadmium Control/Safety Rod Disposal at the Groundwater VOCs and Heavy Metals. By Two Basins Containing Radioactive Sludge at Savannah River Site. By Steve H. McInnis. May Mary H. Ace. July/Aug. 2001: 24-27. ORNL. By Angie Brill, Elizabeth Krispin, 1995: 30-34. January/February 2002 Radwaste Solutions 53 Can-in-Canister Demonstration at DWPF. By Daniel I. Michael, Paul K. Black, Inez Triay, Point 2. By Stephen A. Trovato and John O. Nicholas H. Kuehn III, Jeffery R. Brault, David and Lawrence A. Souza. Mar./Apr. 2000: 55-64. Parry. July 1995: 13-19. T. Herman, M. John Plodinec, Mary K. An- Eyes on the Numbers: A Report on Spectrum Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning: Re- drews, Jeffery T. Coughlin, Poh-Sang Lam, and ‘98. By Nancy J. Zacha. Nov./Dec. 1998: 47-52. moving Restoring, and Reusing. By Michael D. W. Gene Ramsey. May 1997: 20-22, 24, 26. Cavanaugh. Mar./Apr. 2001: 59-61. Improvements to Alpha Continuous Air Mon- Closing High-Level-Waste Tanks at the Savan- itoring Systems at the WIPP. By H. Bates Es- Cruisin’ Up the River: The Final Journey of the nah River Site. By Thomas B. Caldwell, Paul D. Trojan Reactor Vessel. Nov./Dec. 1999: 48-52. d’Entremont, Christine A. Langton, Jeffry L. tabrooks, Sheila G. Clayton, and Richard F. Newman, Eloy Saldivar, Jr., and Narasimhan Farrell. Oct. 1994: 80-85. D&D . . . and Now Demolition. By Janenne Rajendran. Mar. 1998: 19-26. 100 and Counting: Rocky Flats is the Nation’s Irene Harrington. Sep./Oct. 2001: 24-25. Developing a Gamma Spectroscopy System at Top Shipper to WIPP. May/June 2001: 36-37. Decide, Design, and Dewater de Waste: A Blue- the Savannah River Site. By David A. Filler and Ready, Set . . .: A Process for Operational print from FitzPatrick. By Dennis E. Robert. Brian S. Crandall. Nov. 1996: 49-52. Readiness at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. By Apr. 1994: 21-22. The Good, the Bad, and the Money; Or, What’s Joseph L. Epstein. Mar./Apr. 1999: 67-73. Decommissioning One, Operating Two: At San Right and Wrong with Privatization. By Nan- Repackaging a Transuranic Waste Stream for Onofre, Breaking Up Is Hard To Do. By Ray cy J. Zacha. Jan./Feb. 1999: 38-40. WIPP Disposal. By David R. Yeamans, Kapil Golden. July/Aug. 2000: 20-23. Let’s Model It: Using Computer Simulation to K. Goyal, and Matthew J. Roybal. Mar./Apr. Decommissioning “The Rock:” A Photo Tour Improve Waste Processing Safety. By Jerry 2001: 26-32. of the Big Rock Point Restoration Project. Fireman. Nov./Dec. 2000: 31-33. WIPP Certification: A DOE Success Story. By Sep./Oct. 1999: 60-62. The Lowdown on L-Lake: A GIS Evaluation George E. Dials. Jan./Feb. 1999: 15-19 Decommissioning Trojan: A Step-by-Step Tour of Proposed Savannah River Site L-Lake Draw- WIPP Marker Development. By Kathleen M. of a Landmark Process. By Stephen Quennoz. down. By James S. Bollinger and David L. Trauth. Apr. 1994: 46-52. May/June 1999: 17-21. Dunn. Mar./Apr. 1999: 53-57. WIPP-WIPP-Hoo-Ray! World’s First TRU Decommissioning Yankee Rowe. By Kenneth Magazine, Rack, and Canister: Designing the Sa- Disposal Facility Begins Operations, Receives J. Heider and Russell A. Mellor. July 1994: 26, vannah River Site Plutonium Immobilization First Wastes. By Chuan-Fu Wu. May/June 28-32. Program System. By Mitchell W. Stokes, Grego- 1999: 22-27. ry L. Hovis, E. Lee Hamilton, James B. Fiscus, DfD at Big Rock Point. By Jane Dunshee and and Robert H. Jones. July/Aug. 1999: 49-54. Lisa Wheat. May/June 1999: 28-30. Yucca Mountain New Technologies in the SRS “Toolbox.” By A Diablo Canyon Double Feature: When Less Contrasting the WIPP and Yucca Mountain. By David Yannitell. July/Aug. 2000: 28-34. Is Less, by Clint Miller; Consolidation of Waste Chris G. Pflum. July 1995: 25-33. Correlation Factors, by Clint Miller and L.T. Processing High-Level Waste at the Savannah The EIS at a Glance: An Overview of the Claytor. Mar. 1996: 64-70. River Site. By Austin B. Scott, Jr., and Neil R. DOE’s Yucca Mountain Draft Environmental Davis. May 1996: 34-38. Dismantling the Recirculation Pump Room at Impact Statement. Nov./Dec. 1999: 43-47. Big Rock Point. By Janenne Irene Harrington. Radioactive Waste Sampling Supports Process- The Evolution of Spent-Fuel Waste Packages: Mar./Apr. 2001: 56-58. ing. By Thomas A. Nance. Mar. 1997: 18-22. Designing the Means to Permanently Dispose of Doin’ the D&D: Dancing to the Regulatory Remote Automatic Control Scheme for Plasma U.S. High-Level Nuclear Waste. By Hugh Ben- Tune. By John D. Haseltine and Stephen J. Mil- Arc Cutting of Contaminated Waste. By Aed ton and Judy Connell. Mar./Apr. 2001: 34-42. ioti. Jan./Feb. 1999: 44-49. M. Dudar, Clyde R. Ward, and Eric M. Kri- ikku. Jan. 1994: 56-62. Interview with Wesley E. Barnes, Yucca Moun- Engineering for Transportation and Disposal of tain Project Manager. By David A. Schabes. Low-Level Radioactive Wastes in Japan. By July 1995: 20-24. West Valley Demonstration Project Yutaka Suzuki, Yoshihiro Akagawa, and Hiroo Ohno. Oct. 1994: 64-70. Getting “Fired” Up: Size-Reduction with an Natural Analogs for Yucca Mountain. By Oxy Gasoline Torch. By K. A. Szlis, K. R. William M. Murphy. Nov. 1995: 44-50. Fast Track Steam Generator Disposal at Salem Schneider, S. W. Chase, J. A. Choroser, and H. Repository Heat and Hydrological Behavior at Generating Station. By Herb Cruickshank, R. Moore. Sep./Oct. 2001: 10-15. Yucca Mountain. By Thomas A. Buscheck and John Gomeringer, and Robert Killen. Jan. 1998: Getting Pumped: Lessons Learned from the John J. Nitao. Apr. 1994: 71-76. 50-54. Decontamination and Removal of High-Level Fermi-1 Update: Impact of a Decommission- Staged Licensing and the Need to Assure Issue Waste Pumps at the West Valley Demonstra- ing Evaluation and the Decommissioning Rule. Closure in New NRC Regulations for Licens- tion Project. By William F. Hamel Jr., Kimber- By Lynne S. Goodman. Nov. 1997: 45-48. ing the Yucca Mountain Repository. By F. Stan- ly J. Mansfield, and Paul J. Valenti. Jan./Feb. ley Echols. July 1998: 10-14. Five Sites, One Team, One Standard: The En- 1999: 5-14. tergy Approach to Radwaste Management. By Yucca Mountain: Solving an Existing Environ- How to “Do” Windows: Refurbishment of Cyndy Moore. Nov./Dec. 1999: 14-16. Shield Windows at the West Valley Demon- mental Problem. By J. Russell Dyer. July 1998: stration Project. By K. R. Schneider, M. J. Fiz- 16-18. A Forum on the MPC: The Independent Re- zano, J. L. Drake, and C. Kalkwarf. Jan./Feb. view Group’s Comments on the MPC, by John 2001: 37-40. Utilities A. Vincent; The Nuclear Waste Technical Re- Adapt, Be Nimble, Be Open-Minded: Reducing view Board’s View’s on the MPC, by Dennis L. Vitrification at the West Valley Demonstration Price; The NRC Perspective on the MPC, by Project. By William F. Hamel Jr., Michael J. Radwaste Volumes and Costs at Diablo Canyon. By Bill Keyworth. Nov./Dec. 1999: 17-22. Robert M. Bernero; The MPC System Evalua- Sheridan, and Paul J. Valenti. Mar. 1998: 27-40. tion Report. Oct. 1994: 34-49. The Big Cleanout at Big Rock Point. By Tim Wrapping Up the Leftovers: Management of Fostering Community Participation in De- Petrosky. Jan./Feb. 2000: 14-21. Expended Materials Relating to the West Val- commissioning. By Maureen Brown. Sep. 1998: ley Demonstration Project High-Level Waste Bit by Bit . . . Taking It Apart: The Incremen- 31-35. Virtification Facility. By L. E. Krieger, R. DiB- tal Dismantlement of the Rancho Seco Sec- Four Key Elements for Radioactive Waste Min- iase, W. F. Hamel, and P. J. Valenti. Mar./Apr. ondary System. By Dennis E. Gardiner and imization: Preplanning, Equipment and Facili- 2000: 12-20. John M. Newey. July/Aug. 1999: 9-14. ties, Training. By Gene Henry. Jan. 1994: 20-24. Building a Mixed-Waste Prevention Program WIPP From the Bottom Up: Tank Removal at Trojan. at Comanche Peak. By R. B. McCamey. May Contrasting the WIPP and Yucca Mountain. By By Brian D. Clark and Roger M. Lewis. 1995: 21-28. Chris G. Pflum. July 1995: 25-33. Mar./Apr. 2000: 22-31. Business as Usual . . . Only More So. By Nan- Cutting the Gordian Knot That Binds WIPP: Getting It Right: New Hampshire’s State-of- cy J. Zacha. Nov./Dec. 2001: 9-14. Sampling and Analysis to Validate Acceptable the-Art Nuclear Decommissioning Law. By Knowledge on LANL Transuranic, Heteroge- Cleaning an Entire Plant: Full Reactor Coolant Bruce J. Musico and Harold T. Judd. Nov./Dec. neous, Debris Waste. By Stanley T. Kosiewicz, System Chemical Decontamination at Indian 2001: 21-23. 54 Radwaste Solutions January/February 2002 Goodbye, Golden Goose: The Effects of Con- Radwaste Operations at Diablo Canyon: A A Team Effort: Reducing the Volume of Low- necticut Yankee Decommissioning on the Sur- Photo Essay. Nov./Dec. 1999: 23-26. Level Radioactive Waste. By Kerry Zimmer- rounding Community. By Terry Concannon. mann. Sep. 1996: 39-41. Jan./Feb. 1999: 54-57. Recycling Hits the Big Time: Reactor Coolant Pump Decontamination and Refurbishment at Tell Them What They Want To Know: De- Handling the Unexpected: Connecticut Yan- Oconee. By Tom Shiel. Jan./Feb. 2000: 44-48. signing a Community Outreach Program. By kee’s Concrete Block Recovery Effort. By Darrell M. Lankford. Jan./Feb. 1999: 50-53. Richard Sexton. Jan./Feb. 1999: 58-59. Resuming Decommissioning Activities at Fer- To DOC or Not To DOC: Managing Power mi-1: Problems Encountered and Lessons Have Pipe Cleaning System, Will Travel: Inno- Plant Decommissioning. By Nancy J. Zacha. Learned. By Danny Swindle, Jon Couillard, vative, Cooperative Effort at Big Rock Point. July/Aug. 1999: 60-61. By Janenne Irene Harrington. Nov./Dec. 2000: and Lynne Goodman. July/Aug. 1999: 15-19. To Decommission or Not To Decommission? 21-25. Robots Provide Valuable Tools for Waste Pro- A Guide for Utilities. By Leo Lessard. Here’s a TIP: The Advanced Resin Cleaning cessing at Millstone Nuclear Power Station. By Sep./Oct. 1999: 32-36. System Is Success for Grand Gulf. By Philip Kirk Miles and Kathy Volpe. Mar. 1997: 28-30. A Video Look in the Pool: Spent-Fuel Charac- Theibert. Nov./Dec. 1998: 43-46. Safe from Start to Finish: The 1100-Mile Jour- terization for Dresden-1 Decommissioning. By Heroes for Zeros—Developing a High-Perfor- ney of the Yankee Rower Reactor Pressure Ves- Coleman McDonough, Linwood Ray, John J. mance Team. By Christopher A. Lewis. Sep. sel. By Leo Lessard. Mar./Apr. 2000: 44-49. Villanueva, and Ed Ruzauskas. July/Aug. 1999: 1998: 36-39. 20-23. The Search for Something Better: Improve- The Importance of Radiological Data Valida- ments to Radwaste Processing at Oyster Creek. What If We Lose Barnwell? By Nancy J. Zacha. tion. By Kendra K. Grega and LeRoy F. Wen- By Robert J. Artz and Robert J. Hillman. July/Aug. 1999: 62-63. rick. Mar. 1995: 28-32. Nov./Dec. 2000: 9-15. Where Are You Going—And How Are You Interview with Andrew C. Kadak. By David A. The Shoreham to Limerick Fuel Transfer Proj- Going to Get There? Creating a Virtual Orga- Schabes. Jan. 1996: 17-24. nization for Nuclear Power Plant D&D. By ect. By Rich Wolters, Kevin Theriault, and Bob Carroll Eichhorn. Jan./Feb. 2000: 52-54. Keeping an Eye on the Bottom Line. By Jones. Oct. 1994: 19-26. Michael S. Terrell. Sep./Oct. 2000: 30-32. Where the Utilities Go. Nov./Dec. 2000: 4. Spent Fuel Management at the Northern States The Legacy of Three Mile Island: Implications Power Company. By John Closs and Lon Vitrification for Today’s DOE Challenges. By Richard P. Kress. May 1966: 25-29. Coe, Michael S. Williams, and William T. Multiple Aspects of Cold Crucible Melting. By Conaway. May 1996: 30-33. Striking the Right CORD: Decontamination for Antoine Jouan, Jean-Pierre Moncouyoux, Serge Decommissioning at Connecticut Yankee. By Merlin, and Patrice Roux. Mar. 1996: 77-81. Less Means Less: Duke’s Liquid Radwaste So- Scott Watson, Richard N. McGrath, Horst-Otto lution. By Tom Shiel. Nov./Dec. 1998: 37-42. Vitrification at the West Valley Demonstration Bertholdt, Edmund Friedrich, William J. Szym- Project. By William F. Hamel Jr., Michael J. Liquid Waste Processing at Comanche Peak. czak, and Ed Ruzauskas. Mar./Apr. 1999: 46-51. Sheridan, and Paul J. Valenti. Mar. 1998: 27-40. By Lisa M. Hughes-Edwards and Jeffrey M. Edwards. Sep. 1996: 26-30. Stud Cleaning Made Easier: Reducing Time, Ef- Vitrifying the Hanford Tank Wastes: New fort, and Radwaste at the South Texas Project. Team, New Vision, New Energy. By Sue Low-Level Radwaste Storage Facility at Hope By Edward Conaway. July/Aug. 2000. 24-25. Kuntz. May/June 2001: 26-30. Creek and Salem. By Larry C. Oyen, Kristen K. Lee, Richard Bravo, and Bruce Bo- vankovich. Jan. 1994: 71-74. Moving to Another Stage of Life: Shipping, De- contaminating, and Final Disposition of the Maine Yankee Large Components. Sep./Oct. 2000: 50-55. On-Site Dry Spent-Fuel Storage: Becoming More of a Reality. By Betsy Tompkins. Jan. 1994: 63-70. On-Site Low-Level Waste Storage at D.C. Cook. By Walter T. MacRae. Apr. 1994: 66-70. On-Site Waste Minimization Programs at McGuire Nuclear Station. By Graham T. John- son. May 1998: 21-23. An Operating Philosophy for Volume Reduc- tion. By Frederic J. Mís. Apr. 1994: 42-45. Planning Ahead: Preparing for the Early Retire- ment and Decommissioning of Oyster Creek. By James E. Hildebrand. Nov./Dec. 1998: 31-36. Postirradiation Fuel Assembly Dimensions for Transportation and Storage Cask Designs. By Douglas A. Williamson. Jan. 1994: 42-47. Potential Radioactive Scrap Metal Quantities from Nuclear Power Plants Worldwide. By Leslie A. Nieves and Roger W. Tilbrook. Jan. 1996: 45-53. Private Fuel Storage: Finding Real Solutions for Centralized Spent-Fuel Storage. By Scott Northard. Jan./Feb. 2000: 35-39. A Radwaste Magazine Interview: Managing LLW at the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant. July 1997: 10-13. Radwaste Management at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: Where We Are Today (and How We Got There). By C. C. Miller. Nov./Dec. 1999: 8-13. January/February 2002 Radwaste Solutions 55