DOCSLIB.ORG

Christian Philosophy 18/4/06 12:39 Pm Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Christian Philosophy 18/4/06 12:39 pm Page 1 Christian Philosophy A–Z Daniel J. Hill and Randal D. Rauser R and Daniel PHILOSOPHY A–Z SERIES GENERAL EDITOR: OLIVER LEAMAN al D. R These thorough, authoritative yet concise alphabetical guides introduce the J. Hill central concepts of the various branches of philosophy.Written by established philosophers, they cover both traditional and contemporary terminology. au ser Features & Christian Philosophy A–Z • Dedicated coverage of particular topics within philosophy • Coverage of key terms and major figures • Cross-references to related terms. Daniel J. Hill and A handy guide to the major figures and issues in Christian philosophy from Chri Randal D. Rauser Augustine to the present. This volume covers a broad historical sweep and takes into account those stian Philosophy A–Z non-Christian philosophers that have had a great impact on the Christian tradition. It concentrates, however, on the issues that perplex Christian philosophers as they seek to think through their faith in a philosophical way and their philosophical beliefs in the light of their faith. Examples of the topics discussed are the question of whether and how God knows the future, whether we actually know that God exists, and what Athens has to do with Jerusalem.The leaders of the recent revival of Christian analytic philosophy, especially Alvin Plantinga, Nicholas Wolterstorff, William Alston and Robert Adams are also included. This book will be of interest to those studying Christian philosophy and to Christians seeking to think philosophically about their faith. Daniel J. Hill is Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Liverpool. Randal D. Rauser is Assistant Professor of Historical Theology,Taylor Seminary, Edmonton,Alberta, Canada Cover design: River Design, Edinburgh Edinb Edinburgh University Press 22 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LF barcode www.eup.ed.ac.uk ur gh ISBN 0 7486 2152 0 P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHY A–Z i P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 Volumes available in the Philosophy A–Z Series Epistemology A–Z, Martijn Blaauw and Duncan Pritchard Ethics A–Z, Jonathan A. Jacobs Indian Philosophy A–Z, Christopher Bartley Jewish Philosophy A–Z, Aaron W. Hughes Philosophy of Religion A–Z, Patrick Quinn Forthcoming volumes Aesthetics A–Z, Fran Guter Chinese Philosophy A–Z,BoMou Feminist Philosophy A–Z, Nancy McHugh Islamic Philosophy A–Z, Peter Groff Philosophical Logic A–Z, J. C. Beall Philosophy of Language A–Z, Alessandra Tanesini Philosophy of Mind A–Z, Marina Rakova Philosophy of Science A–Z, Stathis Psillos Political Philosophy A–Z, Jon Pike ii P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 Christian Philosophy A–Z Daniel J. Hill and Randal D. Rauser Edinburgh University Press iii P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 C Daniel J. Hill and Randal D. Rauser, 2006 Edinburgh University Press Ltd 22 George Square, Edinburgh Typeset in 10.5/13 Sabon by TechBooks India, and printed and bound in Finland by WS Bookwell A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN-10 0 7486 2212 8 (hardback) ISBN-13 978 0 7486 2212 2 (hardback) ISBN-10 0 7486 2152 0 (paperback) ISBN-13 978 0 7486 2152 1 (paperback) The rights of Daniel J. Hill and Randal D. Rauser to be identified as authors of this work have been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. iv P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 Contents Series Editor’s Preface vii Introduction ix Acknowledgements xiii Christian Philosophy A–Z 1 Bibliography 201 v P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 This book is lovingly and gratefully dedicated to our respective parents. vi P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 Series Editor’s Preface One of the things that Christian philosophy has going for it is a central text, the New Testament, written in Greek. Greek is a highly appropriate language for philosophy, abstract and capable of fine conceptual distinctions, something the more concrete and basic Hebrew of the Old Testament had diffi- culty accomplishing. The traditional conflict between Athens and Jerusalem, between philosophy and religion, was often thus muted in Christianity since their religion was from the start pretty firmly established in Athens, at least linguistically speaking. The development of Christian philosophy was rapid since even in the early Christian communities the growth of the religion took place in a cultural environment where phi- losophy also flourished. Ever since then the ideas and issues of Christianity have been extensively explored using the var- ious philosophical techniques that have arisen within differ- ent philosophical traditions. It is often difficult to understand what is going on in Christian philosophy, though, since the blend of philosophy and religion may make the reader unsure precisely what argument is being presented, or how it is sup- posed to work. It is the aim of Daniel Hill and Randal Rauser’s guide to the vocabulary of the debate to throw light on this and other aspects of Christian philosophy, and we hope that readers will find it useful in gaining a pathway through this interesting intellectual territory. Oliver Leaman vii P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 viii P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 Introduction Fifty years ago a scan of bookshop shelves would have been as likely to find a dictionary of terms for alchemy as one for Christian philosophy. Indeed, one might well have thought that, though of course there were some Christian philosophers then, they were doomed to the same fate as the dodo. But, in a stunning reversal, today Christian philosophy is among the most vibrant areas of philosophy. While the story of that change is still being written, there are a few key factors. On the negative side, the last fifty years have seen the demise of some historically formidable opponents to Christian philoso- phy, most perspicuously logical positivism and classical foun- dationalism, and this demise is due in significant part to the work of Christian philosophers. On the positive side, there has been a revitalisation of Christian philosophy from a num- ber of sources, including the renewal of Catholic philosophy after the broadening of the Second Vatican Council as evi- dent, for instance, in the diversity of the American Catholic Philosophical Association. Another significant factor is the work of several key philosophers coming out of (or sympa- thetic to important features of) the Dutch Calvinist tradition. Philosophers such as Alvin Plantinga, Nicholas Wolterstorff and William Alston (who, though not a Calvinist, has sympa- thy with the broad approach of Plantinga and Wolterstorff) have provided a formidable body of original philosophical work, all in accord with, or explicitly building upon, their Christian convictions. This new vibrancy led to the founding ix P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 x INTRODUCTION of the Society of Christian Philosophers in 1978 and the es- tablishment of its journal Faith and Philosophy in 1984. One of the first articles to be published in this journal, Plantinga’s seminal address ‘Advice to Christian Philosophers’ (Plantinga 1984), has served as a clarion call to a new generation to ap- proach philosophy without apology from a distinctively Chris- tian perspective. And Christian philosophers continue to do so. Although North America has seen the greatest growth in Christian philosophy, there has been a slower revival in other English-speaking countries, particularly in the UK. In England, Oxford University has, and London University’s King’s College had until recently, a ‘named chair’ for philosophy of religion held by an eminent Christian philosopher: the chair at Oxford was held recently by Richard Swinburne, who was followed by Brian Leftow; and the chair at London was held most recently by Paul Helm. Each of these has done much to advance the field of Christian philosophy in the UK, not least through the British Society for Philosophy of Religion, which developed out of the UK Society of Christian Philosophers. All this means that while alchemy remains an obscure footnote in the history of science, Christian philosophy has emerged as one of the liveliest fields in current philosophy. For that reason, the need grows for a manageable reference guide for students and the interested layperson to the specific tasks and concerns of Christian philosophy, and it is to that need that this book is aimed. Unfortunately, the task of composing a dictionary is a pre- carious one, as one is bound to leave out certain terms, move- ments, positions, or individuals that one or more readers will view as an egregious omission. The best way to respond to inevitable disappointment is to be clear on our criteria for including the particular definitions that we have. In short, we have included particular terms, movements, theories and individuals based on two criteria: either they put forward a P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: FCG EUBK021-Hill/Rauser May 30, 2006 17:22 INTRODUCTION xi distinctively Christian philosophy or they suggest a distinc- tively Christian reply.
Recommended publications
  • Dem Göttlichen Ganz Nah

    Dem Göttlichen Ganz Nah

    Otium Studien zur Theorie und Kulturgeschichte der Muße Herausgegeben von Elisabeth Cheauré, Gregor Dobler, Monika Fludernik, Hans W. Hubert und Peter Philipp Riedl Beirat Barbara Beßlich, Christine Engel, Udo Friedrich, Ina Habermann, Richard Hunter, Irmela von der Lühe, Ulrich Pfisterer, Gérard Raulet, Gerd Spittler, Sabine Volk-Birke 8 Andreas Kirchner Dem Göttlichen ganz nah „Muße“ und Theoria in der spätantiken Philosophie und Theologie Mohr Siebeck Andreas Kirchner, geboren 1983; Studium der Philosophie und der Kath. Theologie/ Religionsgeschichte; 2013–16 Doktorand, seit 2017 PostDoc im Sonderforschungsbereich 1015 Muße. Diese Publikation entstand im Rahmen des Sonderforschungsbereichs 1015 Muße (Teil­ projekt A2: Muße als Lebensform in der Spätantike: „Theorίa“ und monastische Tradi­ tion) und wurde durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gefördert. ISBN 978­3­16­155950­1 / eISBN 978­3­16­155951­8 ISSN 2367­2072 (Otium) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen National bibliographie; detaillierte bibliographische Daten sind im Internet über http:// dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. © 2018 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen. www.mohr.de Dieses Werk ist seit 06/2020 lizenziert unter der Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung – Nicht kommerziell – Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International“ (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Eine vollständige Version des Lizenztextes findet sich unter: https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de. Das Buch wurde von epline in Böblingen aus der Minion gesetzt, von Hubert & Co. in Göttingen auf alterungsbeständiges Werkdruckpapier gedruckt und gebunden. Den Umschlag entwarf Uli Gleis in Tübingen. Umschlagabbildung: Sarcophagus of a learned magistrate surrounded by Muses and philosophers, ca. 280 CE. Rome: Museo Gregoriano Profano, Vatican Museums, inv. 9504 (Ausschnitt).
  • Infinite Ethics

    Infinite Ethics

    INFINITE ETHICS Nick Bostrom Faculty of Philosophy Oxford University [Published in Analysis and Metaphysics, Vol. 10 (2011): pp. 9-59] [This is the final version. Earlier versions: 2003, 2005, 2008, 2009] www.nickbostrom.com ABSTRACT Aggregative consequentialism and several other popular moral theories are threatened with paralysis: when coupled with some plausible assumptions, they seem to imply that it is always ethically indifferent what you do. Modern cosmology teaches that the world might well contain an infinite number of happy and sad people and other candidate value-bearing locations. Aggregative ethics implies that such a world contains an infinite amount of positive value and an infinite amount of negative value. You can affect only a finite amount of good or bad. In standard cardinal arithmetic, an infinite quantity is unchanged by the addition or subtraction of any finite quantity. So it appears you cannot change the value of the world. Modifications of aggregationism aimed at resolving the paralysis are only partially effective and cause severe side effects, including problems of “fanaticism”, “distortion”, and erosion of the intuitions that originally motivated the theory. Is the infinitarian challenge fatal? 1. The challenge 1.1. The threat of infinitarian paralysis When we gaze at the starry sky at night and try to think of humanity from a “cosmic point of view”, we feel small. Human history, with all its earnest strivings, triumphs, and tragedies can remind us of a colony of ants, laboring frantically to rearrange the needles of their little ephemeral stack. We brush such late-night rumination aside in our daily life and analytic 1 philosophy.
  • Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013

    Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013

    PETER GEACH Peter Thomas Geach 1916–2013 PETER GEACH was born on 29 March 1916 at 41, Royal Avenue, Chelsea. He was the son of George Hender Geach, a Cambridge graduate working in the Indian Educational Service (IES), who later taught philosophy at Lahore. George Geach was married to Eleonore Sgnonina, the daughter of a Polish civil engineer who had emigrated to England. The marriage was not a happy one: after a brief period in India Eleonore returned to England to give birth and never returned to her husband. Peter Geach’s first few years were spent in the house of his Polish grandparents in Cardiff, but at the age of four his father had him made the ward of a former nanny of his own, an elderly nonconformist lady named Miss Tarr. When Peter’s mother tried to visit him, Miss Tarr warned him that a dangerous mad woman was coming, so that he cowered away from her when she tried to embrace him. As she departed she threw a brick through a window, and from that point there was no further contact between mother and son. When he was eight years old he became a boarder at Llandaff Cathedral School. Soon afterwards his father was invalided out of the IES and took charge of his education. To the surprise of his Llandaff housemaster, Peter won a scholarship to Clifton College, Bristol. Geach père had learnt moral sciences at Trinity College Cambridge from Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore, and he inducted his son into the delights of philosophy from an early age.
  • Select Bibliography

    Select Bibliography

    SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY Agnoletto, Sara, “La Calumnia di Apelle: recupero e riconversione ecfrastica del trattato di Luciano in Occidente,” La Rivista di Engramma, 42, luglio–agosto, 2005; http://www .engramma.it/engramma_v4/rivista/saggio/42/42_saggiogalleria.html. Alberti, Leon Battista, I libri della famiglia, in Opere Volgari, ed. C Grayson, Bari, 1960. ——, On Painting, trans. J.R. Spencer, New Haven & London, 1966. Alciati, Andrea, Emblemata, Augsburg, 1531; Alciato at Glasgow, 22 editions of Alciato from 1531 to 1621, Glasgow Emblem Website: http://www.emblems.arts.gla.ac.uk. Alexander, Jonathan James Graham (ed.), The Printed Page, Italian Renaissance Book Illu- mination 1440–1550, London, 1944. ——, Italian Renaissance Illumination, London, 1977. D’Alverny, Marie-Thérèse, “Le cosmos symbolique du XIIIe siècle,” Archives d’histoire doc- trinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge, vol. 28, 1953, 31–81. Ames-Lewis, Francis, “Early Medicean Devices,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, XLII, 1979, 122–43. Arad, Lily, “From Creation to Salvation in the Embroidery of Girona,” Miscellània Litúrgica Catalania, 12, 2004, 59–88. Aries, Philippe, Western Attitudes Towards Death from the Middle Ages to the Present, Lon- don, 1974. Ariotti, Piero E., “Toward Absolute Time: The Undermining and Refutation of the Aristo- telian Conception of Time in the 16th and 17th Centuries,” Annals of Science, 30, 1973, 31–50. ——, “The Concept of Time in Western Antiquity,” in Julius Thomas Fraser & Nathaniel M. Lawrence (eds.), The Study of Time, II, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1975, 69–80. Aristotle, Physics, trans. by Philip H. Wicksteed & Francis M. Cornford, London, 1963. Armstrong, Arthur Hilary & Robert Austin Markus, “Time, History, Eternity,” in Christian Faith and Greek Philosophy, London, 1960, 116–34.
  • "Why Adams Needs to Modify His Divine-Command Theory One More Time"

    "Why Adams Needs to Modify His Divine-Command Theory One More Time"

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Asbury Theological Seminary Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 5 1-1-1994 "Why Adams Needs to Modify His Divine-Command Theory One More Time" Stephen J. Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Sullivan, Stephen J. (1994) ""Why Adams Needs to Modify His Divine-Command Theory One More Time"," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 11 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol11/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. "WHY ADAMS NEEDS TO MODIFY HIS DIVINE­ COMMAND THEORY ONE MORE TIME"* Stephen J. Sullivan Robert Merrihew Adams has twice modified the divine-command theory of morality in interesting and plausible ways. The resulting theory says that rightness and wrongness consist respectively in agreement and disagreement with the commands of a loving God, and that a causallhistorical account of the reference of moral terms is correct. I argue, first, that Adams's theory must face up to the objection that it depicts morality-implausibly-as arbi­ trary; second, that the account of reference he accepts does not permit him to adopt either of two natural strategies for rebutting the objection; and finally, that this account does allow him recourse to a third, somewhat less natural strategy which requires modifying the theory one more time.
  • The Problem of Evil

    The Problem of Evil

    The Problem of Evil PHIL6305 New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Defend Conference January 2-6, 2017 Office: Dodd 112, extension #3245 [email protected] Assistant: Katy Platt [email protected] Seminary Mission Statement The mission of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary is to equip leaders to fulfill the Great Commission and the Great Commandments through the local church and its ministries. Course Description The course introduces students to contemporary philosophical issues related to the Christian concept of God and the problem of evil. Issues addressed include the nature of evil, the cause of evil, the intelligibility and coherence of the Christian concept of God in light of evil, solutions offered by various world religions to the problem of evil, as well as representative solutions offered by a selection of contemporary philosophers addressing the topic of evil. The thrust of the course will focus upon personal reading, research, and writing. Core Value and Key Competency The primary core value of the Seminary addressed in this course is Doctrinal Integrity. The primary key competency in ministry addressed is Christian Theological Heritage. The core value for the 2016-2017 academic year is Characteristic Excellence. Core Values Addressed The course will address the core value of Doctrinal Integrity directly and Spiritual Vitality indirectly. Reflection on the problem of evil is intimately related to reflection on the nature and existence of God as well as to considering the doctrine of creation. The vitality of one’s spiritual life is directly related to the degree of trust one places in God, which derives from one’s understanding of God’s nature.
  • HRP Vol 18 Text Vf

    HRP Vol 18 Text Vf

    EPISTEMOLOGY Identity,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 41 Le temps retrouvéA la recherche du temps perdu, Le temps retrouvé 43 Untimely Meditations, By Duncan Pritchard 44 45 Essays and Lectures as best I can the actual methodology employed by analytical 46 view there has been a tendency in the recent debate about the 47 He does not, of course, give reason the same place in our nature as Kant does (he replaces M The Gay Science is that analytical philosophers do when they do philosophy, and this is especially Le temps retrouvé, Le Côté de Guermantes particular, I claim that once we understand the methodology actually employed 51 To the Lighthouse by analytical epistemologists properly then we will see that it is not as exposed 1 A Sketch of the Past, 53 A Sketch of the Past 54 Proust holds that one is for the most part completely closed down by habit: “habit hides almost the whole universe from us throughout our lives,” Le temps retrouvé, 55 56 Collected Tales, Sketches, Speeches – As we will see below, I think this way of describing the methodology of 57 Late Night Thoughts on Listening to Mahler’s Ninth Sympthony (London: Routledge, the philosophical data provided by intuition, I still think we need to recognise The Myth Makers, Much of the focus when it comes to the role of intuition in epistemology is on our intuitive responses to cases, where we are asked to form an intuitive extensional intuitions Duncan Pritchard joined the University of Edinburgh’s philosophy department in 2007 as the new Chair in Epistemology.
  • Conversation with Duncan Pritchard

    Conversation with Duncan Pritchard

    APhEx 15, 2017 (ed. Vera Tripodi) Redattore: Federica Berdini N° 15 GENNAIO 2017 I NTERVISTE Conversation with Duncan Pritchard by Michel Croce Duncan Pritchard is Chair in Epistemology at the University of Edinburgh and Director of Edinburgh’s Eidyn research centre. He is certainly one of the most influential contemporary epistemologists. His main research inter- ests include topics such as the problem of skepticism, the problem of the na- ture and value of knowledge, extended knowledge, and social epistemology. He is author and co-author of several books, editor of the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism and Oxford Bibliographies: Philosophy, and principal investigator of several international research projects hosted at Eidyn. His latest book, Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing, published by Princeton University Press in 2015, provides a novel strategy to address the skeptical challenge. In this Periodico On-line / ISSN 2036-9972 Michel Croce – Conversation with Duncan Pritchard broad interview, Pritchard reveals the theoretical origin of his latest work and illustrates the connections between the main topics he explored in his massive research activity. He also offers interesting anecdotes concerning his personal experience as an academic and insightful advices to those who are willing to pursue a philosophy curriculum. 1. Dear Duncan, thank you very much for accepting my invitation to tell the readers of APhEx something about your work. We’ll have time to discuss in detail various aspects of your philosophy, but let me start with a brief bio- graphical question about your interest in philosophy and in becoming an academic.
  • SOCRATES in the CLASSROOM Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S

    SOCRATES in the CLASSROOM Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S

    SOCRATES IN THE CLASSROOM Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S. Pihlgren Socrates in the Classroom Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S. Pihlgren Stockholm University ©Ann S. Pihlgren, Stockholm 2008 Cover: Björn S. Eriksson ISSN 1104-1625-146 ISBN (978-91-7155-598-4) Printed in Sweden by Elanders Sverige AB Distributor: Stockholm University, Department of Education To Kjell with love and gratitude. Contents Contents ........................................................................................................ vii Preface ............................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 3 1.1 Philosophizing and teaching ethics ..................................................................... 4 1.2 Some guidance for the reader ............................................................................ 5 1.3 Considerations ................................................................................................... 8 2 Research Goals and Design .................................................................. 9 2.1 Classroom interaction ......................................................................................... 9 2.2 Studying Socratic interaction ............................................................................ 10 2.3 Research questions .........................................................................................
  • Summary the Purpose of the Dissertation Is to Present The

    Summary the Purpose of the Dissertation Is to Present The

    Summary The purpose of the dissertation is to present the abductive argument of Richard Swinburne in favor of theism. Richard Swinburne was born on December 26, 1934. He is a British philosopher, a retired professor of the University of Oxford, where he held the position of Nolloth Professor of the Philosophy of the Christian Religion (Oriel College). He has devoted all his philosophical activity to the justification of the Christian faith – he has intended to show that it is rational to believe in God. The main thesis of the dissertation is that Swinburne’s concept of theism does not remain consistent with the assumption that God is perfectly good. This inconsistence comes from the fact that human experience of suffering cannot be reconciled with God’s perfect goodness, especially assuming that God allows or causes the suffering. The structure of the work corresponds to the logical construction of Swinburne’s line of reasoning. The first chapter – Methodology of Philosophy – describes the main philosophical methods Swinburne uses in presenting his arguments. It is divided into two parts: the first one (Theory of Explanation) primarily presents the Swinburne’s construction of the concept of coherence, which is a prerequisite for considering any theory as probable or true. Moreover, this part discusses Swinburne’s dual explanatory theory, according to which two types of explanation are possible: (1) scientific, based on the analysis of unintentional causation, and (2) personal, based on the analysis of intentional causation. At the same time, Swinburne tries to show that it is not possible to explain certain phenomena in the world only by means of scientific explanation.
  • PETER Geach's Views of Relative Identity, Together With

    PETER Geach's Views of Relative Identity, Together With

    SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES By jAMES CAIN ETER Geach's views of relative identity, together with his Paccount of proper names and quantifiers, 1 while presenting what I believe is an inwardly coherent and consistent account, presents us with radical consequences regarding what arguments are to be accepted as valid. For example, consider the argument: ( 1) All men are mortal Fido is a man Thus, Fido is mortal in which 'Fido' names a dog. While this would normally be thought to be a valid argument with a false premise, we shall see that on Geach's theories it turns out to be invalid. In fact for every form of general categorical syllogism we can produce an argument of that form which on Geach's theories turns out invalid. 1 I will only be concerned with the theory of restricted quantifiers worked out in the main body of Reference and Generality, third edition {Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980), not with either his theory of unrestricted quantifiers or the method of interpreting restricted quantifiers mentioned in the appendix to Reference and Generality. 84 ANALYSIS Let us see how this situation arises. We first look briefly at Geach's semantics. According to Geach every proper name is associ­ ated with a criterion of identity which could be expressed using a substantival term; e.g., 'Fido' is, let's say, associated with the criterion of identity given by 'same dog': this can be expressed by saying that 'Fido' is a name for a dog (we may go on to say that it is a name of a dog if it is non-empty; Reference and Generality p.
  • Richard Swinburne's Arguments for Substance Dualism

    Richard Swinburne's Arguments for Substance Dualism

    Richard Swinburne’s arguments for substance dualism. MA by Research in Theology and Religion David Horner September 2018 Richard Swinburne’s arguments for substance dualism. Submitted by David Horner to the University of Exeter as a dissertation for the degree of MA by Research in Theology and Religion in September 2018 This dissertation is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the dissertation may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this dissertation which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 1 Acknowledgements. I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr Jonathan Hill and Dr Joel Krueger for their support and encouragement in the writing of this dissertation and for their patience in trying to keep me on the straight and narrow. I want to acknowledge the many conversations, on this and other topics, I have had with my friend and philosopher, Dr Chris Boyne, who sadly died in June of this year. I thank all my other chums at The Bull, Ditchling, for listening to my metaphysical ramblings. And finally, I thank my wife, Linda, for once more putting up with this kind of thing. 2 Abstract This dissertation is a contribution to debates in the philosophy of mind and of personal identity. It presents a critical account of arguments for substance dualism to be found in Richard Swinburne’s Mind, Brain, and Free Will (2013).