A Footbridge for Little Lever
Background/Context
The Artist’s Brief
A section 106 fund from a housing development at Cricketers View in Little Lever has been allocated for the introduction of public art into the surrounding area for the benefit of residents of the property and the immediate area.
In July 2010 artist Liam Curtin was appointed to develop a public art proposal for the area.
(To refer to the full brief please see Appendix 1)
People
Artist: Liam Curtin Project Manager: Gaynor Cox
The Steering Group
Councillor Anthony Connell (Little Lever Ward Member) Councillor Maureen Connell (Little Lever Ward Member) Councillor Mary Woodward (Little Lever Ward Member) Paula Connor, Bolton Council Project Officer Gaynor Cox, Bolton at Home Housing Arts Officer
Consultation / Engagement activity
The Consultation Forum
There have been three meetings so far of this group, which is made up of local residents and the Ward Councillors. The aim of the group is to be a sounding board for ideas and to guide the artist in local matters. Essentially it is the main context for the consultation process.
In summary the first meeting on 22nd November 2010 supported the idea of an artwork of some kind in the canal area but firmly discouraged the idea of any permanent floating structure. At the second meeting on 25th January 2011 there was 100 percent support for the artist's recent proposal of a footbridge over the canal which would connect Little Lever with Moses Gate Country Park. The third and most recent meeting of the Consultation Forum, held on 15th March 2011, was arranged to update residents on the progress of the project, and to ascertain and try and address the concerns of residents living in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site.
(For full reports on the Consultation Forum please see Appendix 2)
Ship Shape
One Saturday last October a group of local residents made a decorative floating sculpture by stitching thousands of CD‟s together. The finished result was floated on the canal at the Melrose Basin where it dappled the light and made rainbow reflections in the rippling water. It was a chance for artist Liam Curtin to meet local people and to begin a dialogue with the local community about what sort of permanent feature might improve the area around the canal. See picture below.
Little Lever Local Area Forum
On 16th November 2010 Liam made a short presentation about public art in general, his own work and some ideas about how to develop the project in Little Lever. The presentation was generally well received although a few residents raised concerns about the location of the artwork feeling it needed to be in the town centre where more people could benefit. Fortunately the same residents have been attending The Consultation Forum and are now, through the dialogue of this group, firmly in favour of the latest proposals.
A further presentation was made to the Forum on 14th February 2011. This presentation concentrated on the bridge proposal. The meeting was well attended by local residents and young people from the youth club. The bridge proposal was well received, and a positive article and editor's comment about the project subsequently appeared in the 'Bolton News' on 16th February 2011.
(Bolton News article and editor's 'Comment' - see Appendix 3)
Bridge Naming
An initial consultation activity with residents was undertaken at the Little Lever & Darcy Lever Area Forum. If the project receives Executive Member approval, then wider public consultation and/or bridge naming activities involving local residents and schools will be planned.
The Little Lever Youth Club
Liam has been working with the local youth club where young people have been making models of bridges, particularly using the structural element from Leonardo Da Vinci‟s bridge design which is based on interlocking lengths of wood that stay in place due to gravity - sometimes known as a friction lock bridge. See illustrations below It is hoped that by involving young people in this way they will have a sense of ownership of the bridge and as such encourage their peers to respect it.
The project involves art, some physics, a little maths, some quite hard work but hopefully a lot of fun! See picture below.
The design process can involve the young people of the area. If the Council approves this proposal, local schools will be contacted and, where possible, linked educational activities will be developed.
Officers / Agencies already liaised with / to liaise with
Nigel Hartley: Bolton Council Major Parks Team Leader: Moses Gate Alex Allen: Bolton Council Senior Planning Officer Jon Tuson: Bolton Council Senior Engineering Manager (Structures & Estate Development) Nick Smith: Regeneration Manager, British Waterways Paul Hindle; John Fletcher; Steve Dent: Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal Society Michael Craig: Consultant, GMP Design for Security Suzanne Waymont: The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Chris Waters: Bolton GMP Crime Reduction Officer Janett Sheddon: Bolton Council Safer Communities Officers Frank Warren, Bolton Council Health & Safety Officer GMP South Neighbourhood Policing Team Darren Crook: Bolton Youth Leader Michael Wilkinson: Timber Specialist Joe Curley: Craftsman (with whom Liam will be building the bridge) Outline proposal
A Bridge for Little Lever
After considering a number of options for structures in the canal basin area the idea of a footbridge to connect Little Lever with Moses Gate Country Park was considered. This could be both a useful and decorative object which will add to the picturesque landscape and it would mean that the primary school children along with local residents could access the Country Park on foot and dog walkers could extend their regular walks to include both sides of the canal. Liam is excited about the possibilities of creating something that is decorative in both its form and detail along with being practical and useful.
Aims of the bridge: To provide better access to Moses Gate Country park for residents of Little Lever. To extend the scope of walkers. To provide a focus within the landscape. The bridge, although functional will be an artwork too. It may have decorative details. To provide a viewing platform from which to survey the local scenery The footbridge should have a magical element, a structure about which one might weave a story. The artist wishes to imbue the bridge with romance, for it to be a meeting place, “the place of our first kiss” “he proposed to me on the bridge”
Since the last Consultation Forum meeting held on 15th March 2011 (see Minutes at Appendix 2) Liam has lost some confidence in the original proposed site near the Melrose Basin, as a number of strongly negative comments from the nearest residents were expressed. Whilst these objections are not necessarily valid in terms of denying planning permission, in that they rely on a mere perception that a bridge at this site would attract young miscreants, Liam feels that he would not wish to build a structure in the face of such strong opposition.
Developing a proposal for this site has not been a waste of time however as there are a number of useful lessons to be learned and now a new and better site has emerged as a result of this process.
Alternative Site for a Bridge
The new site is a little further south at Nob End on the site of an old footbridge. The brick and stone abutments are still there and whilst they need some renovating and in some areas rebuilding they present an ideal base for a new bridge. It was the Manchester Bolton & Bury Canal Society that had brought this site to Liam‟s attention, as it ties in with improvements they are making to the area. Diverting the footpath over a newly erected bridge on the site of the former bridge will allow the canal society to clear the arm of the canal that leads to the flight of locks that linked Bolton and Bury to Manchester. This will allow the Canal Society to re-introduce water to this section and achieve another step in their long term goal of renovating the whole canal. The Canal Society has plans to introduce a picnic area near to this site and is keen to see the bridge acting as a focal point and a place of congregation.
(Please see Appendix 4 - email from Paul Hindle, Chairman Designate, Manchester Bolton & Bury Canal Society dated 24th May 2011.)
The brick and stone abutments are very attractive in their form and material and should be restored to their original specification. This traditional base gives the artist an opportunity to make an interesting juxtaposition between old and new.
The Canal Society, though keen to see the footbridge replaced, are happy to give the artist a free hand in the design. Liam is keen to work closely with the Canal Society in order to maximise the potential for landscaping the area.
Another advantage of this site is that due to the existing abutments and the topography of the immediate area the bridge can be built without steps making it accessible to all. The previous bridge design attracted criticism as it required steps to gain the necessary three metre height above the water line.
A bridge on this site will provide a perfect viewing platform for people to see the whole river valley and beyond. The artist will take this into account when considering the design.
As regards the design of the bridge, this has yet to be considered in any depth, there being a need to assess a range of design restraints. (Please see recommendations below.) The new design is likely to be constructed from steel rather than timber given that the span is greater than at the previous site. This also takes into account a number of comments about a wooden bridge being vulnerable to fire.
Local building contractors would be engaged to restore or rebuild the abutments. The bridge is likely to be made in sections by a steel fabricator and installed on site by contractors.
In summary these are the main advantages to the Nob End Site.
1) It fits in with other, long term plans to improve the area. 2) It creates an opportunity to restore the attractive bridge abutments 3) It replaces a former bridge 4) It will be better for the artist and the project to work with highly active partners - the Canal Society have an on-going relationship with British Waterways, the authority who will have to approve the plans 5) The bridge will have disabled access 6) The bridge will make an ideal viewing point to see the river valley and beyond 7) The bridge, if made from steel, will be less vulnerable to vandalism
For more information about the Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal Society please see http://www.mbbcs.org.uk/
Below: the proposed site for the bridge.
Site specifications / considerations
Also see recommendations below
Liam will work with Jon Tuson (Bolton Council Engineer) who has also offered to do the calculations for the structure so that we can accurately determine the gauges of any materials used and guarantee the structure stability.
Bolton Council Senior Planning Officer, Alex Allen, will be consulted with regard to planning considerations attached to the site.
Local police and crime safety officers will be consulted to identify, address and, where appropriate, limit any issues that the bridge may bring.
Maintenance
The bridge will be constructed in such a way as to minimise maintenance.
A commuted sum of less than £5,000 will be handed over to the Council from the budget, for maintenance and testing of the bridge. This will involve a bi- annual visual inspection by Council Engineers and a 6 yearly bridge test.
On completion, officers of the Council will be invited to inspect the bridge and if satisfied ownership will pass to the Council. The artist will stay engaged for a further 12 months to attend to any 'snagging'.
See budget below
Current Budget
Total allocation £89,000.00
12.5 % management fee amount £11,125.00 sub-total £77,875.00
10% contingency amount £7,241.60 sub-total £70,633.40 Minus expenses due to Bolton at Home - Stage 1: room hire, interview fees, printing, St John's ambulance + marquee for consultation event £545.90
Stage 1: consultation & design proposal amount £11,800 sub-total £58,833.40
Stage 2: implementation (including CURRENT STAGE 2 £58,833.40 maintenance / decommissioning budget) BUDGET Plus £7,241.60 contingency, or potential use as commuted sum
Stage 2 Budget £66,075.00 Total available budget including the above mentioned contingency
Materials 16,000.00 Transport 900.00 Planning fees 350.00 Other professional fees including surveys 1,500.00 Equipment hire including on site fencing and 2,200.00 scaffolding, generator, site storage facilities, etc. Foundations and site preparation. 2,000.00 Subcontractors fees (site work and fabrication) 12,000.00 Assistants wages 3,500.00 Workspace rent (3 months) 5,400.00 Maintenance (estimated commuted sum) 3,500.00 Contingency 3,725.00 Artists Fee (including design, fabrication, 15,000.00 coordination, on site management, consultation etc.
Total 66,075.00 A more detailed budget for stage 2 will follow. At the moment until a final design is complete it is difficult to assess exact costs. The budget takes into account the following:-
Materials, transport, labour, subcontractors fees, fees for surveys, engineers fees, artist‟s fee, expenses in association with consultation and planning fees.
Recommendations
Subject to final approval of the scheme by Executive Member for Development, Regeneration & Skills (June 2011), if Bolton Council wishes to progress the idea of developing a bridge for this site then there will be a need to revise the artists brief to include a range of design criteria and restraints.
The artist suggests that the Council should form a group, which would include an Engineer, Planner, representative from British Waterways and others they may wish to include. This group would examine the situation and create a new brief for the artist which will include all the necessary design specifications and consultation processes.
The group will also work with the artist in order to draw up an appropriate timetable for development and construction.
APPENDIX 1
Public Art Scheme: Williams Street, Little Lever, Bolton
Introduction
Housing Percent for Art is seeking an experienced public artist or creative collaboration with demonstrable community engagement and design skills.
Housing Percent for Art - a service located within Bolton at Home, the arms length management organisation (ALMO) managing Bolton Council's housing stock - is currently acting on behalf of Bolton Council to provide a project management service relating to the development and delivery of a number of its public art schemes.
Housing Arts Officers work with communities to help improve their neighbourhoods through arts projects. Housing Percent for Art's objectives are: To help improve the physical and social fabrics of communities To develop opportunities with local cultural industries To encourage closer links between artists, residents and the professionals that shape the environment To work in partnership to develop Borough wide arts and culture projects
Aim
Cricketers View is a large development of private residential properties on Williams Street, Little Lever, Bolton. Through the Council's Development Control Policy Note for the Provision of Public Art (January 2005), a sum has been allocated for the introduction of public art into the surrounding area for the benefit of residents of the property and the immediate area.
Context
Little Lever is an area of Bolton and forms part of Little Lever & Darcy Lever ward, which (according to the 2001 Census) has a total resident population of around 12,000 people and covers an area of 481 hectares.
As the Cricketers View development is very close to the Little Lever town centre, this creates a number of opportunities and potential links.
A number of physical improvements to the town centre are planned through Bolton Council's District Centre Improvement Fund, however the shopping precinct is a relatively poor environment and comprises a high number of vacant units, and the economy and shopping experience would no doubt benefit from an injection of creativity. The public art scheme is therefore an opportunity to raise the profile of Little Lever; to kick-start the reinvigoration of a rather tired and dated high street; and to attract new businesses and users to Little Lever town centre. .
This public art scheme will require consultation with local Members and residents of the Williams Street development. However, this scheme is also an opportunity to engage with local people on a wider scale, particularly with residents and tenants of the adjacent private and social housing estates, with shopkeepers and town centre users, and with young people (through local schools and youth groups).
The Brief
We are looking for an experienced public artist or creative collaboration to undertake research and consultation, prepare a Design Proposal for an appropriate public art scheme, and (subject to approval) ultimately implement that Design Proposal.
A Design Proposal is initially sought for a public art scheme to create a permanent piece of public art; a number of smaller, linked pieces of public art; or a temporary public art event leading to a permanent piece of public art. We are particularly keen to encourage applications from artists working in the medium of light installation.
The public art scheme will consist of two stages.
Stage 1: research, consultation and production of appropriate public art design proposal Stage 2: (subject to approval) implementation of the design proposal
Preparation of this design proposal will include:
Consultation with Members, local residents, Bolton Council and Bolton at Home officers, and other relevant stakeholders Researching and identifying suitable site(s) in the surrounding area Producing an appropriate design specification Identifying all relevant technical issues Preparing a 'Stage 2' budget (including projected maintenance and/or decommissioning considerations and costs) Preparing an implementation schedule
The project may also be a potential opportunity for shadowing/work experience for a new / emerging public artist. The successful candidate must therefore show a willingness and ability to manage that individual.
Budget & Timescale
Total project budget available: £70,000
Stage 1:
Consultation, and preparation and delivery of appropriate public art Design Proposal and design specification.
The contract for this preparatory work will run from July 2010 to the submission of the Design Proposal by 31st October 2010.
The fee for Stage 1 will be agreed on the basis of the daily rate and number of days proposed to: undertake consultation, and to research, prepare and deliver an appropriate public art design proposal and design specification.
The artist is requested to submit a proposed range of fees including number of days proposed to undertake Stage 1 of this project.
Total fee for Stage 1 will need to cover all relevant costs including: Artist fee Materials and expenses Research All costs relating to the production of an appropriate design proposal and specification Travel and accommodation Insurance
Stage 2:
Implementation of Design Proposal - subject to approval by Bolton Council.
Timescale for implementation, fabrication and/or installation to be delivered within the Design Proposal and agreed by Bolton Council prior to commencement of Stage 2.
The total fee for this stage of the project will be determined by the budget delivered within the Design Proposal and agreed by Bolton Council prior to commencement of Stage 2.
The budget will need to cover all relevant costs including: Artist fee Fabrication and installation costs Construction & any ground work Planning fees Transport Travel and accommodation Materials and expenses Insurance
Skills & Experience
You will be a professional, practising artist, with at least three years experience of creating quality and innovative public art works. The appointed artist will be able to demonstrate:
the delivery of comparable projects and the aptitude to deliver this type of work relevant design and technical skills, and demonstrable understanding of the technical issues relating to public art work experience of working with relevant professionals, including planners, architects, health and safety officers, and local government officers experience of influencing key stakeholders in the delivery of public art experience and understanding of working with communities, to collaboratively explore the ideas of residents on a creative, constructive and social level excellent communication and community engagement skills excellent budget and project management skills
For working with children and/or vulnerable adults, you will need to be aware of child protection policy, and will have, or be willing to have, Enhanced CRB Disclosure. You will also need to provide evidence of eligibility to work in the UK, and public liability insurance cover between the value of £2m and £5m.
Management arrangements
This contract is offered on a freelance basis. The selected artist will work as part of a team comprising officers from Bolton at Home, Bolton Council and other relevant agencies that will provide all appropriate support for the preparation of a design proposal.
Monitoring and evaluation
The project will require the provision and/or reporting of monitoring and evaluation information.
You will be required to obtain (and provide on request) details of individuals and groups consulted.
You will be required to attend project update meetings with officers and/or provide update reports at regular intervals.
To apply
You should send a letter of application, including:
a short response to this brief (no more than one side of A4) outlining why you are interested in this commission and what relevant experience you would bring to it CV or other documentation with a summary of previous work details of two references a proposed range of fees including number of days proposed to undertake Stage 1 of this project
Deadline: Applications should be submitted by 5.00 pm on Monday 14th June 2010
Please apply to:
Gaynor Cox Housing Arts Officer Bolton at Home Breightmet UCAN Centre 28-30 Greenroyd Avenue Breightmet Bolton BL2 5DD
01204 333632 [email protected] www.housingpercentforart.org.uk
APPENDIX 2
Little Lever s106 Art Project Consultation Forum Little Lever Community Centre 6.30 - 800 pm, 22nd November 2010
Attending:
Liam Curtin Lead artist Councillor A Connell Councillor M Connell Councillor M Woodward Gaynor Cox Housing Arts Officer (East), Bolton at Home Yolande Baxendale Shadowing artist Sharon McCarthy Resident May Barlow Resident Sandra Jones Resident Graham Bailey Resident Andrew Sproat Resident Paul Richardson Resident R. E. Richardson Resident Helen Ireland Resident (Darcy Lever) Emily Hewson Bolton Council Play & Children's Services (5-19s)
Context
Bolton at Home's Housing Percent for Art service has been asked to project manage an arts project in Little Lever on behalf of Bolton Council. The budget for the arts project has come from a planning agreement related to the Cricketers View residential development on Williams Street, Little Lever.
As the developer of the scheme did not wish to commission specific artwork for the development, a financial contribution was made to the Council to create artwork on a nearby or other appropriate site. As with other similar s106 agreements, Bolton Council has agreed that the site of the artwork must fall within the Ward.
A recruitment panel, involving Gaynor Cox (Bolton at Home Housing Arts Officer), Paula Connor (Bolton Council Project Officer) and the three Ward Members recruited and commissioned artist Liam Curtin in July 2010. Liam has been working in Little Lever since that time to creatively engage and consult with residents of Little Lever, and to research suitable sites, in order to produce a design proposal and specification for an appropriate artwork.
This is the first stage in the process and any proposal will need to have be supported by Ward Members, and be submitted to and approved by Bolton Council's Executive Member for Development, Regeneration and Skills
Introduction
Liam gave a brief presentation regarding his arts background, previous projects and experience.
Liam then gave a brief outline of the ideas and theme for the project so far, particularly focusing on water and the canal. A community event, titled „Ship Shape‟, was held on Saturday 16th October in order to generate residents‟ interest in the project, and a temporary artwork (a 'CD boat') created by the artist working with local residents was launched onto the canal.
Liam initially suggested that the art project could be something usable (a river boat, or a series of boats, for example), or something decorative (like a floating art trail); it could be something permanent or something temporary. However, if there was an overwhelming view from residents against any suggestion, then this will obviously be taken into account.
Anything proposed for the water will need to be licensed, looked after, maintained and stored – these are all things that will be investigated and agreed prior to any final proposal being drawn up. Liam is currently talking to organisations in the area about the possibility of a boat being adopted. A licence was obtained from British Waterways for the „Ship Shape‟ activity.
Residents concerns:
Not a lot of people use the canal and some residents felt the project should be sited more central to the population and housing of Little Lever (which is mostly to the East of the canal). However, it was also suggested that something attractive would attract people to the canal. Councillor M Connell said that a number of people from the other side of Little Lever and from Cricketers View had commented to her positively about activity on the canal.
One resident stated that Bolton Anglers Society had raised concerns that an art work on the canal would interfere with fishing. Liam confirmed that permission would be sought from British Waterways and anglers‟ concerns would be investigated.
Safety was an issue for some residents, particularly regarding teenagers trying to access any work sited in the canal. However, the project could also be an opportunity to educate young people. Emily Hewson suggested contacting the Outdoor Education Team (Emily will provide a contact), who provide trained sailors and watersports activities for children and young people. Councillor Woodward confirmed that Bolton Council would not approve or support any project without considering safety - safeguarding children and young people is a Council priority. It was suggested that focusing on the land adjacent to the canal would be a safer option.
Vandalism was another issue that was raised. However it was suggested that involving young people in consultation and construction of the art work would help to reduce the possibility of the artwork being damaged. Comments were made that very little vandalism had occurred in the town centre and that young people from Little Lever don‟t tend to hang around Little Lever, they go to Bolton. Residents ideas for the canal area:
One resident suggested that attracting people to the canal would benefit residents by encouraging people to be more healthy, to exercise more, and could (for example) contribute to the prevention of obesity.
Restoration of the old boat house building was suggested. However the last estimate for the cost of repairs to the building was £250k and the current art budget is therefore not sufficient. However, a piece of work on the Melrose Basin may kick-start more activity in, and possible regeneration of, the canal area.
One resident suggested something to sit in and watch the world go by. Liam suggested the work could be a pavilion that people could sit it, or a boat house „folly‟, although a boat house would need a boat.
One resident said they would love to see boats back on the canal, and suggested a day- long „Little Lever Regatta‟, possibly as a launch event for the art work.
A number of residents took the view that it is important to seek the views of, and involve young people in the project, and that it is the older generation‟s responsibility to ensure the quality of the work and that the work is of benefit to future generations.
It was suggested that young people would more likely want the artwork to be something that was interactive.
Emily Hewson suggested Liam undertake a separate consultation with young people, involving something „hands-on‟. Ward Members and Emily left the Consultation Forum early in order to attend a meeting at the Youth Centre and said they would make the suggestion to the young people there. Liam said that he had made contact with Little Lever High School, planned to do some workshops with school children, and wanted to involve young people, particularly 'disaffected' young people, in building the art work.
Other suggestions included something suspended over the canal, and a history trail with the boat house as the starting point. A number of residents said that they would like to see something other than a single sculpture. Liam agreed that he wouldn‟t want to produce a clichéd piece of public art, neither would he want to stitch together an art work based on the industrial heritage of the area (local industry, he said, should be documented and recorded but not necessarily celebrated).
Other sites proposed by residents:
The land opposite the entrance to Cricketers View as an alternative site for the project - although this is land designated for housing. The land around Potters Brew at the entrance to Little Lever.
PLEASE NOTE:
Date of next Consultation Forum meeting
Tuesday 25th January 2011, 6.30 to 8.00 pm, at Little Lever Community Centre, Mytham Road, Little Lever
Little Lever Art Project Consultation Forum Little Lever Community Centre 6.30 - 8.00 pm, Tuesday 25th January 2011
Attending:
Liam Curtin Lead Artist Councillor A Connell Gaynor Cox Housing Arts Officer (Bolton East), Bolton at Home Sharon McCarthy Resident Fran & Stan West Resident Graham J Bailey Resident Julie Skinner Resident Flo Cordock Resident H D Ireland Darcy Lever Residents Association Kath Kelly Little Lever West Residents Association R E Richardson Resident M Berry Resident E Cartwright Resident Sandra Jones Resident May Barlow Resident Paul Richardson Resident Andrew Sproat Resident S Dent Manchester, Bolton & Bury Canal Society
Apologies: Councillor M Connell Councillor M Woodward John Fletcher Manchester, Bolton & Bury Canal Society Emily Hewson Bolton Council Play & Children‟s Services Yolande Baxendale Shadowing Artist Dawn Yates-Obé Resident
Liam informed the group that, as suggested at the last meeting, he had visited the Youth Centre to speak to the young people there about the project.
Mr R. Richardson commented that he still had concerns that the siting of the art work at the canal for the project meant that it “wasn‟t for the masses”, as not a lot of people go to the canal. A number of residents disagreed Mr Richardson‟s concerns.
Liam said that the consensus of residents attending the last Consultation Forum in November last year seemed to be that they were happy with the canal as the site of the art work, but they weren‟t happy with anything „floating‟. As a result of that meeting, Liam had reconsidered the proposed artwork.
Liam informed the group that nothing will be constructed on site without planning permission, speaking to a bridge engineer and structural engineer, etc., and (if approval was granted) once construction was completed a Council bridge engineer would inspect the bridge on a regular basis (every 2 years).
Concerns were raised by a number of residents regarding potential vandalism of a bridge, particularly considering the potential increase in footfall. Liam said that we were looking at addressing this in advance by working with some of the young people from the area. Liam also said that vandals would have a job damaging the bridge as, if it was made out of oak timber, it would be tough.
Liam has visited the Youth Centre and has worked with the young people there over the last few weeks, making small models, and at the last session the group made a half-size model bridge (half the size of the width of the canal pinch point, which is 6.2m).
Liam is also considering a bridge-building activity with the young people - possibly building a temporary bridge over the canal similar to Leonardo's military friction bridge. The activity will involve the young people having to use a bit of maths, a bit of physics, a bit of woodwork, etc. There is also the potential to use the activity as a sort of consultation and invite local residents to come along and try it out. Liam has proposed this idea to dog walkers and they like the idea. The temporary bridge will be staffed and supervised at all times, however some more work with the youth group will be required and a group of adults would be needed to help out. Residents suggested contacting the local Scouts Group - contact David Bootland.
Mr Paul Richardson commented that when he said the newsletter that Liam had produced and delivered to properties in the vicinity of the canal, and the idea for the bridge, he was “inspired”. It opens up access to the towpath and to the Country Park from the Redcar Road side of the canal, and thinks it will help to develop that end.
Mr Graham Bailey mentioned that the bridge project would link to getting active / keeping fit, and therefore contribute to the health of the community. It would encourage people to walk, and people could go for longer walks. Dog walkers would be particularly interested, as it would mean they would be able to access both sides of the canal. It won‟t allow people to walk further along the canal, but it would allow people to access the Country Park.
The Canal Society said that they had received loads of positive comments about the temporary „Ship Shape‟ boat and it had attracted a lot more people to the canal.
Liam said that he had wanted to make the work of art usable, and this idea has a number of functions. It‟s not just utilitarian, however, as Liam is also planning it to be a decorative thing in a beautiful landscape, possibly decorated with „jewel-like‟ glass, ceramic and/or enamel pieces, and possibly working with schools to design these. Although we won‟t be expecting the children to make the artwork, it will help to give them a sense of ownership and pride, and therefore help to protect the bridge.
According to British Waterways, the bridge needs to be 3m above the water. This will mean it will act as a viewing platform, and give a much better view of the landscape. It will also has a romantic element for some – “I‟ll meet you by the bridge”.
Liam has spent time making news letters to deliver to properties around the canal in the hope that those residents might keep an eye on the bridge in the future. If no-one loves it, then it won‟t be looked after. Liam will be working hard to make people love the idea.
One resident raised the concern of dog fouling. This is a valid concern, as an increase in the number of people using the area could naturally mean an equivalent increase in dog poo. Liam will be working with the Canal Society regarding cleaning up / tidying up the area, and this issue will be taken into account in discussions with the Council. The Canal Society is currently doing regular tidy-ups in the area, until funding is secured to clean the canal area in future. Residents suggested Community Payback could be contacted, as they had done a fantastic job of clearing footpaths etc around Little Lever recently.
The Council‟s Planning Officer has informed Liam that he will have to produce an ecological survey as part of the project.
Steve from the Canal Society informed the group that there was a working party at Nob End on Saturday/Sunday 29/30 January 2011 and everyone is welcome.
Liam recollected Mr Paul Richardson‟s comment at the last meeting about having a Regatta and activities in the summer at the end of the project at Melrose Basin. Mr Richardson said it would be reminiscent of the TV programme „Midsomer Murders‟, where there is always a carnival or fete – it‟s an idea that‟s been kicking around for a while.
One resident suggested that posts at each end of the bridge be considered in the construction to prevent motorbikes going over.
The question of disabled access was raised. Liam said that we need to look into this more and he has had discussions about this with the Country Park. If ramps are used, it would need a very long ramp because of the gradient required (1:11?). It may not be possible, or impractical - similar to the issue of stiles in the countryside. It will, however, be a „jewel in the landscape‟ for everyone to enjoy. But we will give it as much thought as possible and make it as easy as possible for less able bodied to use.
One resident suggested Liam have a look at the bridge between Bradford Park and Leverhulme.
Using the local scaffolding firm was suggested – possibly approach them and possibly get „at trade‟ prices and publicity for them.
Liam will be presenting an update to the Little Lever & Darcy Lever Area Forum on Monday 14th February 2011, at Mytham Road Primary School, from 6.30 pm. Flyers advertising the Area Forum were distributed to those attending.
Little Lever Art Project & Bridge Proposal Special Community Safety Consultation Forum
Tuesday 15th March 2011 6.30 - 8.00 pm Little Lever Community Centre, Mytham Road
Attending: Councillor Mary Woodward (Chair) Councillor Anthony Connell Liam Curtin Lead artist Joe Curley Lead Artist's Assistant Yolande Baxendale Shadowing Artist Gaynor Cox Arts Officer, Bolton at Home Paula Connor Bolton Council Development & Regeneration Steve Dent Manchester, Bolton & Bury Canal Society PC Gary Howard GM Police PCSO Claire Lindop GM Police Janett Sheddon Bolton Council Community Safety and residents: Patrick Boyce May Barlow David Sillery Sandra Jones Anita Sillery H M Ireland Christine Matthews E Cartwright Lynne Kempster-Lee M Berry Neil King Alan Thomason Andrew Sproat R. E. Richardson Julie Skinner Graham Bailey Flo Cordock
The purpose of the meeting is to update residents on the progress with regard to developing an art project in Little Lever, and also to try to address residents' concerns around potential anti-social and environmental issues regarding a proposed bridge at the pinch point of the canal.
Liam Curtin, lead artist, provided a verbal update on the project, and gave some background to the project for residents that were new to the meeting. Liam has been commissioned by Bolton Council to research, consult with residents and develop a proposal to spend a section 106 contribution from the private 'Cricketers View' development (Williams Street, Little Lever). Liam's initial idea for a boat on the canal was rejected by the first meeting of the consultation forum in November and residents asked Liam to consult with young people in the area. It is hoped that working with young people with help to create ownership and reduce vandalism of the bridge. Liam undertook a number of creative engagement sessions with young people at the Little Lever Youth Centre, and a number of the young people subsequently attended the Little Lever & Darcy Lever Area Forum. Liam reported back to the consultation forum with an idea for a bridge over the canal. The bridge would be decorative as well as functional, whilst also being tough and low maintenance. This idea received positive support from residents attending the meeting but, in order to try to address concerns that residents in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site may have, today's third and extended meeting of the Consultation Forum was arranged.
The Consultation Forum was informed that, if the proposal received approval from the Council, the project team will work with the Neighbourhood Policing Unit and Community Safety Team, and a survey will be undertaken with the assistance of the GMP Design for Security unit. They have received information about the project and have given their initial comments. An ecological survey will also be undertaken. Liam told residents that we are not trying to impose the bridge on them, merely trying to talk about the possibility of a bridge, creating a route from Little Lever to the Country Park.
Liam has had various discussions with Council officers, Councillors, residents, Moses Gate Country Park, British Waterways. The Council had tried to build a bridge over the canal at this site a number of years ago, but lacked the funds needed to do this, and British Waterways agree that there is a need for a bridge. Liam also said that a number of people he had talked to liked the idea of the bridge, particularly walkers, dog walkers and anglers.
A number of concerns were raised and discussed by the Consultation Forum, as follows:
Although the project team had leafleted the estate on a number of occasions, some residents from Ascot Road said that this was the first that they had heard about the project.
One resident informed the meeting that he was against the bridge proposal due to existing anti-social behaviour issues in the area. A number of residents agreed and gave examples of the type of anti-social behaviour that currently occurred in the area, including:
kids leaving carrier bags and rubbish in residents' back gardens; bonfires, and fires being built using bark that has been ripped off the trees while the temporary CD boat was afloat on the canal, one resident said that they went out regularly to prevent kids from trying to damage it and from throwing stones at it a lot of off-roaders - a bridge might turn the site into a 'rabbit run' (Police indicated that they were aware of motorbikes using the towpath) litter - some residents are going down to the canal on a daily basis to clear litter up dog mess (although this is an issue everywhere in Little Lever)
Residents were concerned that anti-social behaviour could increase if the project went ahead and that in summer evenings it would cause young people to congregate. Officers said, however, that there is no evidence to say one way or another that a bridge would make the current problems any worse, and residents agreed that it was a minority of young people causing the problems. One resident who lives opposite the bridge is worried that in summer it will attract 'undesirables' to the area. She also informed the meeting that there are other access paths to the Country Park a short distance (approximately 8 minutes walk) from the site.
Regarding a question about disabled access - Bolton Council stated that they consider it may be unfeasible to facilitate disabled access but Bolton Council are in the process of obtaining legal advice regarding this. One resident said that it would be unlikely that any wheelchairs would be able to access the canal in any case, as the site is regularly waterlogged.
Liam informed the Consultation Forum that, according to British Waterways and building regulations, the bridge needs to be at least three metres in height. Regarding a question about maintenance of the bridge - Liam confirmed that he had had discussions about maintenance and a sum will be set aside for maintenance by the Council (unlike the United Utilities owned Wilsons Bridge, which residents raised as an example). Liam stated that a bridge would be better maintained than an artwork, as bridges have to be inspected and tested regularly by the Council.
One resident said that the only people that wouldn't be able to access the bridge are the residents at Ascot Road that back onto the canal, as the land is overgrown at the rear of their properties. Steve Dent (Canal Society) confirmed that the area at the rear of the properties is not a towpath (there is no right of way and the land belongs to British Waterways) and is not meant to be cleared, but is meant to be left as scrub. Councillor Woodward stated that if the bridge project goes ahead then it could be a trade-off that the scrub is cleared away at the back. The Community Payback scheme, which has done a lot of good environmental work in the area, has already been considered regarding this. Alternatively, Steve Dent suggested that all the residents could get together and clear the land.
Some residents supported the proposed bridge. Comments included:
it would be a feature and that it had been well thought out. we shouldn't just give into those committing anti-social behaviour one resident was worried at first about a floating structure, and had suggested that young people consulted at the first meeting, but a better alternative would be a bridge. one resident said that they think the bridge is a great idea, they were just worried about the consequences.
One resident informed the meeting that the Police are aware of the issues in the area, that they had taken names and the problems seem to have reduced. The Police informed the group that they are currently focusing their attention of anti-social behaviour problems in another area of Little Lever, particularly around Food & Tipple, where most anti-social behaviour (ASB) issues is currently occurring.
The Police also confirmed that ASB issues are always going to occur in the area of a canal, and that they can only react. It is only mere speculation to suggest that ASB will increase with the bridge and the Design for Security team at GM Police will be consulted to try and 'design out' crime, but this type of activity can't be predicted: it is an unknown quantity. Janett Sheddon (Community Safety) suggested consequence management be established if the bridge goes ahead. Litter, anti-social behaviour and other issues would need to be monitored and dealt with.
The Community Safety and Neighbourhood Policing Unit suggested that the GMP Design for Security team, and the new Crime Reduction Adviser be consulted, and that we should keep the Safer Communities Officer and Neighbourhood Policing Team in the loop so they have a working brief regarding what's happening.
Regarding a question of budget cuts and whether the Police would be affected. Police numbers are not expected to be reduced, as they are considered frontline. All proposed cuts will be natural wastage and back office staff.
Police officers asked residents to call and report any issues so that they can manage the problems - they can't stop anti-social behaviour if no one reports it.
Regarding litter - this issue is down to the Council. However, the Police will work with the Enforcement Team and Community Payback to assist with litter problems in the area.
If residents want to report an issue they should ring the Response Team. Residents can phone, email, report through Area Forums or contact the Be Safe Website. If residents think there's danger to life then they should ring 999.
Police officers informed residents that there will be a shift change in summer and they will generally be working afternoons. If there is ASB in the area that is reported then this is monitored and, if not dealt with, then they are taken to task.
Date of Next Meeting
To be advised.
Police contact numbers:
In an emergency you should dial 999.
An emergency is when a crime is being committed or has just been witnessed, there is a risk of injury, or a risk of serious damage to property.
In an non-emergency you should dial 0161 872 5050 or contact the Bolton South Neighbourhood Policing Team on 0161 856 5608
If you have any queries or would like more information regarding this project, please contact Gaynor Cox, Bolton at Home, 01204 333632 [email protected] Consultation Forum & Mailing List
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 1. Paula Connor [email protected] 2. Councillor A [email protected] Connell 3. Councillor M [email protected] Connell 4. Councillor M [email protected] Woodward 5. Liam Curtin 2 Worthing Street Manchester M14 7PP 6. Joe Curley 35 Hurstville Road Manchester M21 8DJ 7. Chris Lloyd Bolton Council Assistant Head [email protected] of Service Performance & Improvement, Environmental Services and resident of Little Lever 8. Yolande Shadowing artist 72 New Heys Way Baxendale Bradshaw Bolton BL2 4AQ 9. Andrew Sproat 19 Worcester Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1DZ
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 10. Sharon 21 Ascot Road McCarthy Little Lever Bolton BL3 1ED 11. Nigel Hartley Major Parks Team Leader Bolton Council - Moses Gate Environmental Services Department Rock Hall Moses Gate Country Park, Hall Lane Farnworth Bolton BL4 7QN 12. John Fletcher Chairman, Manchester, 36 Trawden Avenue Bolton & Bury Canal Bolton Society BL1 6JD 13. Steve Dent Working Party Organiser, 31 Tiverton Close Manchester, Bolton & Bury Canal Society 14. Emily Hewson Positive Activities Little Lever Youth Centre Provision Team Leader Herbert Street Bolton Council Play & Little Lever Children's Services Bolton BL3 1L 15. Helen Ireland Darcy Lever Residents 6 Snow Hill Road Association Darcy Lever Bolton BL3 1SR 16. May Barlow 145 Tong Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1PU
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 17. Sandra Jones 32 Wilby Avenue Little Lever Bolton BL3 1QE 18. Graham Bailey 7 York Avenue Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EU 19. Paul Richardson 24 Ripon Close Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EQ 20. R. E. 38 Aintree Road Richardson Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EQ 21. David & Anita 1 Doncaster Close Sillery Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EG 22. Julie Skinner 11 Holcombe Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EJ 23. Flo Cordock 11 Holcombe Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EJ 24. E. Cartwright 30 Lancaster Drive Little Lever Bolton BL3 1XF 25. Kath Kelly Little Lever West Residents 11 Kershaw Avenue Association Little Lever Bolton BL3 1QS
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 26. The Secretary Little Lever Churches Together King's Centre Market Street Little Lever Bolton BL3 1HN 27. The Sycamore Project Zac's Youth Bar 71 Market Street Farnworth Bolton BL4 7NS 28. Marie McKinney Greenbelt Action Group 42 Newbury Road Secretary Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EA 29. The Secretary Little Lever Cricket Club Victory Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1JB 30. Mrs Berry 90 Aintree Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1ER 31. Mrs Fiddy 11 Worcester Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1DZ 32. Mark Bolton 94 Aintree Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1ER 33. Mr Heaton 89 Aintree Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1ES 34. Ms T Horrocks 17 Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1ED
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 35. Mrs Williams 8 Beverly Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1HB 36. Mrs Fran West + 30 Newbury Road Mr Stan West Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EA 37. Mr & Mrs Hyla 4 Holcombe Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EJ 38. Mr Watson 17 Worcester Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1DZ 39. Jenny Skehan 49 Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 40. Mr S Bolger & 50 Ascot Road Ms A Bolger Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 41. The Occupier 51 Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 42. Christine 52 Ascot Road Matthews Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 43. Mrs Probert 54 Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 44. Mrs J O‟Connell 56 Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 45. Mr R Gibbon & 58 Ascot Road Ms V Gibbon Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 46. Mr Paul Riley & 60 Ascot Road Ms C Riley Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 47. The Occupier 62 Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 48. Mr P Boyce & 64 Ascot Road Ms J Boyce Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 49. Mr J Kempster- 66 Ascot Road Lee & Mrs Lynn Little Lever Kempster-Lee Bolton BL3 1EE 50. Mr N King & Ms 68 Ascot Road E King Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 51. Gemma Doherty 68a Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 52. Mr & Mrs Hill 70 Ascot Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1EE 53. Janett Sheddon Safer Communities Officer Bolton Council Community Safety Team Farnworth Town Hall Market Street Farnworth Bolton BL4 7PD 54. GMP South Neighbourhood boltonsouth.neighbourhoodteam@g Policing Team mp.police.uk 55. GMP South Neighbourhood [email protected] Policing Team 56. PC 06536 Gary GMP South Neighbourhood [email protected]; Howard Policing Team [email protected] 57. PCSO 65044 GMP South Neighbourhood [email protected] Claire Lindop Policing Team 58. GMP South Neighbourhood [email protected] Policing Team 59. GMP Crime Reduction Officer [email protected] 60. Maurice Police Community Support [email protected] Pennington Officer 61. Andrea Police Community Support Parkinson Officer
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 62. Michael Craig Consultant, GMP Design for [email protected] Security g 0161 856 5912 [email protected]
2nd Floor, Charlton House, Chester Road, Old Trafford, Manchester, M16 0GW. 63. Jeff Gibson [email protected] 64. Graham 13 Ascot Road Howarth Little Lever Bolton BL3 1ED 65. Alan Thomason 88 Aintree Road Little Lever Bolton BL3 1ER 66. Lynette Works at Bolton CVS, resident [email protected] Rushmore of Little Lever 67. Dawn Yates- Works for Housing Percent for dawn.yates- Obe Art, resident of Little Lever [email protected] 68. Keely Wilkinson 75 Ladyshaw Road [email protected] Little Lever 69. Margaret Mytham Road CP School [email protected] Simpson [Would like to be involved as over the next 2 years, art and creativity is a key focus for Mytham]
Name Organisation Contact 'Ship Consultation Forum Shape' 16th Oct 22nd 25th 15th 2010 Nov Jan March 2010 2011 2011 70. Claire Hope Masefield CP School [email protected] [Can't attend consultation forum but would like to be kept updated] 71. Claire Hardman Ladywood Special School [email protected] [Expressed interest in their pupils being involved in the consultation / community art project]
APPENDIX 3
APPENDIX 4
From: [email protected] To: [email protected] CC: David Baldacchino
To Whom It May Concern
I support the proposal to re-instate the former ‘Horse Bridge’ (No 50) over Prestolee Top Lock at Nob End. The brick and stone abutments are largely intact, and will give the bridge the required headroom. The bridge would re-instate the original towing path of the canal, and would allow the present path across the infilled lock to be removed. The bridge would provide a superb point from which to view the flight of the six locks. Paul Hindle Chairman Designate Manchester Bolton & Bury Canal Society: www.mbbcs.org.uk