DOCSLIB.ORG

New Civil Engineer APRIL 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Inside: Contractors face rail cuts p16 Cumbria fl ood recovery p50 New Civil Engineer APRIL 2018 1993: TWYFORD DOWN 2018: STONEHENGE? WITH MORE CONTROVERSIAL PROJECTS IN THE PIPELINE, 25 YEARS ON WE EXPLORE HOW ENGINEERS CAN BUILD PUBLIC SUPPORT In the UK, 2.44 million properties are at risk of flooding by rivers and seas. 3 million more are at risk from surface water. Source: Institution of Civil Engineers DO YOU CHOOSE TO SINK OR THINK? Join the debate about the future of drainage iPad 9:45 AM 100% HOME LEARN MORE CONTACT Time is running out to share your thoughts on the Future of Drainage. IT’S TIME TO THINK NOT SINK Welcome to the drainage brain storm, an initiative to promote ‘out of the box’ thinking around the connected challenges posed by flood waters, climate change and urban development. To the open question ‘What is the future of drainage?’ enter your ideas, suggestions or answers in CHOOSE TO THINK the box provided. Your response can be as short or as detailed as you wish. Then click submit and NOT SINK complete your details. We’ll enter all contributions into a draw to win one of two iPad Pros. It’s time to think not sink. Enter your thoughts on the future of drainage below THOUGHT STARTERS I think the future of drainage is… Is it time to stop talking and act? What role could information technology play? Is managing water quality as vital as water quantity? Are SuDS the answer? Join the conversation at: futureofdrainage.co.uk NEXT Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookie Policy 60650_31 NCE April Issue.indd Pg1 06/03/2018 10:01 New Civil Engineer MAJOR PROJECTS MUST PUT CUSTOMERS FIRST MARK HANSFORD EDITOR here is much engineering excitement this month about ance the need to deliver desired improvements for customers, while proposals for a high speed rail version of the M25, as also being sensitive to the needs of affected local communities? proposed by Expedition. There is also excitement As we discuss this month, there is a real need to make the public feel T about a bridge between Scotland and Northern Ireland, that projects are “done with them, not to them”. proposed by the Scottish Government. Tim Jones has much to do with the solution. He is in charge of Both are bold ideas, and both have engineering and economic merit. delivering the Lower Thames Crossing for Highways England and he is But while we engineers are getting giddy about these tantalising of the mistakes of the past. As he tells us this month: “I think what we grands projets, the public is getting excited in rather different ways did to Twyford Down was absolutely outrageous. It is the worst piece of about another bunch of projects. civil engineering I think I have ever seen in my life”. In Sheffield the outrage about the city council’s tree felling policy in the name of a £2bn PFI highways improvement programme has taken another turn for the worse this month, with the latest attempt to fell one It is not so inconceivable that tree requiring 33 police officers and 20 security staff to deter protesters. And there is no sign of a let up in public fury, with a funding-raising we could see the return of concert fronted by Pulp front man Jarvis Cocker selling out in minutes. scenes witnessed at Twyford Down The day job for Sheffield’s contractor Amey’s engineers really cannot be a great one right now. and then at the Newbury bypass Those engineers are not alone, as tempers are flaring in north west London, where an ancient woodland is soon to be bulldozered in the back in the early 1990s name of High Speed 2. There, a High Court injunction has just been granted to bar eight protesters from demonstrating on the site of the “ Colne Valley viaduct. Good luck with that – Sheffield’s got one of those One of the challenges presented by the current planning regime is and it has not done much good. that debate about the need for major schemes is taken away from pub- This is serious stuff. If you follow the right people on Twitter you’ll lic inquiries, with that decision already having been made through a soon see there are plenty more protest groups gearing up for action. national policy statement. Debate about those is aimed at professionals The mood has changed and it is not so inconceivable that we could see and it leaves the public feeling left out. the return of scenes witnessed at Twyford Down (our cover image) and One proposal on the table is for a French-style commission for public then at the Newbury bypass back in the early 1990s. engagement, which would act as a forum for debating major schemes at And this is all before we get stuck into the truly controversial the earliest possible stage. It was introduced in France in the late 1980s schemes that are coming up, mainly sitting on Highways England’s to- when it – like the UK – was having problems with protests against major do list. They include the Lower Thames Crossing, which will drive a six schemes – in its case its high speed rail network. or eight lane highway through the Kent countryside; the £260M Arun- As we report this month, it has served France – and French engineers del bypass running through the South Downs in West Sussex, and then – well. With the mood now one of protest, we might be well advised to the daddy of them all, the £1.6bn A303 Stonehenge tunnel. encourage our political paymasters to take a look. So how do engineers, and those that we advise, act to ensure we bal- l Mark Hansford is New Civil Engineer’s editor APRIL 2018 | NEW CIVIL ENGINEER 3 Contents NEW CIVIL ENGINEER APRIL 2018 MAGAZINE OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS 03 Comment, 31 World View Report: Analysis & News Customer Focus 06 Lighthouse: We must act to make construction sector more secure 08 The Edit: HS1 to HS2 link proposed 09 The Edit: London City airport deck extension 12 Analysis: Engineers’ salaries rise 14 Analysis: Carillion fallout 18 Your View: Climate change 22 The Interview The industry is waking up to the fact that the public often feels alienated from decisions which determine what infrastructure is built. It also feels isolated from information which can help them travel more e ciently. This report examines how the industry can respond 22 Yorkshire Water’s Nevil Muncaster 32 Overview: How can the industry 40 What can be done to improve on innovations and its £1.1bn alliance better engage with the public, communication with transport users framework when planning major construction projects? 44 Debate: Changing attitudes to road 24 The Response: Wavin’s Martin works over the last 20 years Lambley on why innovation is good 4 NEW CIVIL ENGINEER APRIL 2018 New Civil Engineer Get news delivered daily Weekly Wrap and analysis delivered weekly with our newsletters. Sign-up at newcivilengineer.com Story of the week: A technical investigation into bridge collapses in South East Asia 16 Special 26 Business CONTRIBUTORS Report Culture Katherine Smale p16 Rail special report [email protected] Twitter @katsmaleNCE Jess Clark 26 Civic Engineers focuses on social p28 Tax and R&D 16 Tier 1 rail contractors are moving [email protected] out of rail enhancements work as value and engineering for people Twitter @jclarkjourno Network Rail refocuses spending 28 SMEs: How to get R&D tax credits 50 Tech 60 ICE Excellence Record Emily Ashwell p26 Civic Engineers [email protected] Jackie Whitelaw p32 Customer Focus 50 Engineers are painstakingly rebuiding 61 Engineering cities, Big Bang fair, Fiona McIntyre p50 Cumbria bridge a Cumbrian bridge which su ered Sustainable development goals, fi [email protected] serious scour during the 2015 fl oods Northern Powerhouse Twitter @fi onaMcNCE APRIL 2018 NEW CIVIL ENGINEER 5 Lighthouse ICE VIEWPOINT We must act to make the construction sector more secure he national debate overnight. There may well be some and news cycles can uncomfortable truths. Carillion’s be fickle and hard Construction represents over collapse should T to predict. However, 6% of the national economy; our one thing we can say social and economic well-being is be the canary down for sure, is that if it were not for the fundamentally underpinned by an domination of Brexit in the public’s efficient, effective infrastructure the mine. We must imagination then infrastructure system; and for every pound we would be at the front of everyone’s BY ART WE spend as a nation on infrastructure, take proper account mind. MASTER we generate £3 of economic activity. “of what has occurred Following a variety of high WHAT WOULD In essence, good infrastructure profile issues, from the Grenfell MASTER US allows society to be more tower tragedy to the collapse of productive and for its people to Carillion, our sector has been facing have better lives, and earn more. significant challenges. We should This means it is incumbent on us to canary down the mine. We must not shy away from tackling these make sure that the sector, which is take proper account of what has simply because other items have so hugely important, is as secure as occurred and take the appropriate taken primacy. Simply because they it can be. action. are not on the tip of everyone’s The current makeup of the Arguably more important, we tongues does not mean they are not industry means that most of the are divorcing deliverers from serious.
Recommended publications
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia

    Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia

    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
  • PLATFORM Is Published By: the Stourbridge Line User Group, 46 Sandringham Road, Wordsley, Stourbridge, West Midlands, DY8 5HL

    PLATFORM Is Published By: the Stourbridge Line User Group, 46 Sandringham Road, Wordsley, Stourbridge, West Midlands, DY8 5HL

    Issue 18 December 2019 Worcester Shrub Hill will be getting faster services on the route to London this month using bi-mode trains. Up to the 1960s, this route was the domain of GWR Castle Class locomotives such as 7029 Clun Castle, seen at Shrub Hill on 24 August. CONTENTS 2 A Winter Of Discontent ? 4 Bridging The Missing Link … An Update 4 News In Brief 5 A Time To Consolidate 6 A New Community Rail Partnership 7 Promises, Promises, Promises 8 Christmas Photo Quiz - Name The Film PLATFORM is published by: The Stourbridge Line User Group, 46 Sandringham Road, Wordsley, Stourbridge, West Midlands, DY8 5HL - 1 - www.stourbridgelineusergroup.info A WINTER OF DISCONTENT ? by Roger Davis If you believe Ben Elton’s BBC2 This poor bloke’s comedy series Upstart Crow, the been waiting since speech that starts “Now is the winter 1557 for a Stratford train of our discontent” was written by William Shakespeare one night when his train from Moor Street to Stratford was cancelled, the following service terminated at Whitlocks End, and he was forced to complete his journey on a replacement stagecoach service. While this is a corruption of the truth, many rail passengers in the (Radio Times) West Midlands are asking whether we really are heading towards a winter of discontent to follow what has been an autumn of discontent. West Midlands Railway has admitted that problems exist and has pointed to “an over-ambitious timetable enhancement in May 2019”. This is certainly true on the Chase Line between Walsall and Rugeley Trent Valley where the extension of services to London Euston has resulted in regular late running and an unacceptable level of cancellations north of Walsall.
  • Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future

    Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future

    Infrastructure for Business Flying into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying into the Future Flying into the Future têáííÉå=Äó=`çêáå=q~óäçêI=pÉåáçê=bÅçåçãáÅ=^ÇîáëÉê=~í=íÜÉ=fça aÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMNO P Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ________________________________________ 5 1. GRowInG AVIATIon SUSTAInABlY ______________________ 27 2. ThE FoUR CRUnChES ______________________________ 35 3. ThE BUSInESS VIEw oF AIRpoRT CApACITY ______________ 55 4. A lonG-TERM plAn FoR GRowTh ____________________ 69 Q Flying into the Future Executive summary l Aviation provides significant benefits to the economy, and as the high growth markets continue to power ahead, flying will become even more important. “A holistic plan is nearly two thirds of IoD members think that direct flights to the high growth countries will be important to their own business over the next decade. needed to improve l Aviation is bad for the global and local environment, but quieter and cleaner aviation in the UK. ” aircraft and improved operational and ground procedures can allow aviation to grow in a sustainable way. l The UK faces four related crunches – hub capacity now; overall capacity in the South East by 2030; excessive taxation; and an unwelcoming visa and border set-up – reducing the UK’s connectivity and making it more difficult and more expensive to get here. l This report sets out a holistic aviation plan, with 25 recommendations to address six key areas: − Making the best use of existing capacity in the short term; − Making decisions about where new runways should be built as soon as possible, so they can open in the medium term; − Ensuring good surface access and integration with the wider transport network, in particular planning rail services together with airport capacity, not separately; − Dealing with noise and other local environment impacts; − Not raising taxes any further; − Improving the visa regime and operations at the UK border.
  • Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport

    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport

    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport 30 August 2017 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Department for Transport’s information and use in relation to Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Business Case. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 108 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5159267 Document ref: v4.0 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Interim draft for client Rev 1.0 - 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft for client Rev 2.0 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft addressing Rev 3.0 - 22/08/2017 client comment Rev 4.0 Final 30/08/2017 Client signoff Client Department for Transport Project Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Document title Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme: KO1 Final Business Case Job no. 5159267 Copy no. Document reference Atkins Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme | Version 4.0 | 30 August 2017 | 5159267 2 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 12 1.1. Background 12 1.2. Report Structure 13 2. Scope of the Appraisal 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Scenario Development 14 3. Timetable Development 18 3.1. Overview 18 4. Demand & Revenue Forecasting 26 4.1. Introduction 26 4.2. Forecasting methodology 26 4.3. Appraisal of Benefits 29 4.4.
  • High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead?

    High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead?

    High Speed Two: Full Speed Ahead? The UK government has given the “green light” to the High Speed Two (HS2) rail project in its entirety, following the outcome of the Oakervee Review, ending months of speculation over the future of the scheme. Phase 2b of the project, linking Crewe to Manchester and Birmingham to Leeds via Sheffield, is subject to further review. It now forms part of an ambitious “High Speed North” integrated masterplan, including Northern Powerhouse Rail and other local rail improvements. What will this mean for landowners, occupiers and others who are directly affected by the HS2 scheme? Time will tell. However, the announcement is likely to be welcomed, as it provides certainty that the project will now proceed, although concerns over the long-term plans for delivery of Phase 2b will persist. HS2 Limited’s remit will be to “…focus solely on getting On all fronts, the government’s announcement gives phases 1 and 2A built on something approaching on time grounds for optimism. The government has pledged to learn and on budget” and, in respect of Phase 2b, new “delivery lessons from Phase 1 and improve how the project is being arrangements” will be put in place, but not before “…an delivered, highlighting the need for better communication and integrated plan for rail in the north” has been introduced. engagement with local communities impacted by the scheme. Grand plans no doubt, but close attention will be paid to the detail, including the enabling legislation required to deliver Major concerns will also remain over the delivery of the Phase 2a of the project and future plans for the design and scheme, including timescales for completion of each phase, delivery arrangements for Phase 2b.
  • 125Mph Test Heralds Midland Main Line Upgrade | Transport Briefing Page 1 of 2

    125Mph Test Heralds Midland Main Line Upgrade | Transport Briefing Page 1 of 2

    125mph test heralds Midland Main Line upgrade | Transport Briefing Page 1 of 2 Welcome [email protected] Log out Search the site ENTER TEXT HERE Front page News & analysis Intelligence & resources Agenda & monitors Power 200 Subscribe About 125mph test heralds Midland Main Line upgrade East Midlands Trains: Class 222 Posted 03/07/12 completed inaugural 125mph run Trains on the Midland Main Line on Midland Main Line will be able to run at 125mph from December 2013. On Sunday (1 July) East Midlands Trains successfully completed two 125mph runs on the route, 15mph faster than the current top line speed of 110mph and the first time a diesel train has operated at 125mph on the MML. British Rail's gas turbine Advanced Passenger Train has previously travelled at 125mph along the line. Network Rail granted special permission for a Bombardier-built Class 222 Meridian to operate at its maximum speed along an eight and a half mile stretch of the Midland Main line RELATED ARTICLES between Bedford and the site of the former Ampthill station. HLOS and SoFA published by Scottish Government The high speed test was set up to research the effects of travelling at 125mph on the Inskip reveals rail wish lists for CP5 and CP6 line's infrastructure as Network Rail continues with a line improvement programme Funding agreed to link Swanage to rail network designed to cut journey times between London St Pancras and cities in the East Beccles loop will double east Suffolk line trains Midlands. 125mph passenger services are expected to begin with the timetable Hants pursues Waterside rail line reopening change in December 2013.
  • Report-Cannock Railway Station

    Report-Cannock Railway Station

    Item No. 14.1 Report of: Head of Economic Prosperity Contact Officer: Dean Piper / Debbie Harris Contact Number: 01543 464223 Portfolio Leader: Economic Development & Planning Key Decision: Yes Report Track: Cabinet: 28/01/21 Cabinet 28 January 2021 Cannock Railway Station 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 The report presents to Cabinet the Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC) for a transformational upgrade of Cannock Railway Station and sets out the implications and potential next steps. 1.2 The report also provides Cabinet with an update on a set of planned improvements to enhance the Station in the short-term which the Council is implementing in partnership with Staffordshire County Council, West Midlands Rail and West Midlands Trains. 2 Recommendation(s) 2.1 That Cabinet notes the Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC) for the transformational upgrade of Cannock Railway Station as attached at Appendix 1. 2.2 That Cabinet agrees that Options A and C as set out in the SOBC should be selected as the two shortlisted options to be developed further. 2.3 That Cabinet authorises the Head of Economic Prosperity in consultation with the Portfolio Leader for Economic Development and Planning, to work in partnership with West Midlands Rail Executive and Staffordshire County Council to develop the Outline Business Case and delegate authority to the Head of Economic Prosperity to decide on the timing and procurement strategy for this work. 2.4 That Cabinet authorises the Head of Economic Prosperity in consultation with the Head of Finance and the Portfolio Leader for Economic Development and Planning to submit relevant bids for external funding to secure investment to support the upgrade of the Station.
  • Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015

    Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015

    Crossrail 2 factsheet: Services between Berrylands and Hampton Court New Crossrail 2 services are proposed to serve all stations between Berrylands and Hampton Court, with 4 trains per hour in each direction operating directly to, and across central London. What is Crossrail 2? Crossrail 2 in this area Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway serving London and the wider South East that could be open by 2030. It would connect the existing National Rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire with trains running through a new tunnel from Wimbledon to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate. Crossrail 2 will connect directly with National Rail, London Underground, London Overground, Crossrail 1, High Speed 1 international and domestic and High Speed 2 services, meaning passengers will be one change away from over 800 destinations nationwide. Why do we need Crossrail 2? The South West Main Line is one of the busiest and most congested routes in the country. It already faces capacity constraints and demand for National Rail services into Waterloo is forecast to increase by at least 40% by 2043. This means the severe crowding on the network will nearly double, and would likely lead to passengers being unable to board trains at some stations. Crossrail 2 provides a solution. It would free up space on the railway helping to reduce congestion, and would enable us to run more local services to central London that bypass the most congested stations. Transport improvements already underway will help offset the pressure in the short term. But we need Crossrail 2 to cope with longer term growth.
  • HOUSE of LORDS Parliamentary Debates

    HOUSE of LORDS Parliamentary Debates

    2 Volume Index to the HOUSE OF LORDS Parliamentary Debates SESSION 2014–15 7th July, 2014—26th September, 2014 (VOLUME 755) £00·00 Obtainable on standing order only The first time a Member speaks to a new piece of parliamentary business, the following abbreviations are used to show their party affiliation: Abbreviation Party/Group CB Cross Bench Con Conservative Con Ind Conservative Independent DUP Democratic Unionist Party GP Green Party Ind Lab Independent Labour Ind LD Independent Liberal Democrat Ind SD Independent Social Democrat Lab Labour Lab Ind Labour Independent LD Liberal Democrat LD Ind Liberal Democrat Independent Non-afl Non-affiliated PC Plaid Cymru UKIP UK Independence Party UUP Ulster Unionist Party No party affiliation is given for Members serving the House in a formal capacity, the Lords spiritual, Members on leave of absence or Members who are otherwise disqualified from sitting in the House. © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2015, this publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 7th July, 2014—26th September, 2014 1 - INDEX TO THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES OFFICIAL REPORT INDEX FOR SESSION 2014–15, Volume 755 7th July, 2014—26th September, 2014 EXPLANATION OF ARRANGEMENT AND ABBREVIATIONS Dates of proceedings are indicated by numerals in brackets. Volume numbers are shown in square brackets. Bills: Read First, Second or Third Time = 1R, 2R, 3R. Column numbers in italics refer to Written Answers. - - A417: A436: Advisory Bodies: Ahmad of Wimbledon, Lord— Question, [755] (26.9.14) WA466. Questions, [755] (8.7.14) WA23.
  • Introduction Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail)

    Introduction Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail)

    9th September 2013 Railfuture Oxford to Cambridge (East West Rail) campaign Briefing note on route options for the Central Section from Bedford to Cambridge Introduction The government and the Office of Rail Regulation have approved the upgrading and rebuilding of the railway between Oxford and Bedford, the Western Section of East West Rail. Railfuture is a long-term campaigner for the completion of the East West Rail project to Cambridge and into East Anglia. The Eastern Section of the route is already in use from Norwich and Ely to Cambridge via the soon to be opened Cambridge Science Park station; from Ipswich via Bury St Edmunds and Newmarket to Cambridge; and from Stansted Airport to Cambridge. Map 1: The East West Rail Link Between Bedford and Cambridge some of the original route is lost to development and population growth in the region has occurred away from the original stations. The question of corridor and route selection is therefore a key factor in making the case for the Bedford to Cambridge (Central) section of East West Rail. Railfuture is assessing the candidate corridors that have been identified by the East West Rail (EWR) Consortium. An early conclusion is that routes for possible approaches to the two nodes, Bedford and Cambridge, should be agreed and protected at an early stage, such is the pace of growth and development. Page 1 of 10 9th September 2013 Purpose The purpose of this document is to set out the options for EWR route options for the approach to Cambridge from the west. The options for Bedford will be covered by another document.
  • Lane End, Northern Gateway, Flintshire

    Lane End, Northern Gateway, Flintshire

    Imperial West Lane End, Northern Gateway, Flintshire Transport Assessment ational Curtins Ref: 078461-CUR-00-XX-RP-TP-001-V01 Revision: V01 Issue Date: 15 March 2021 Intern Sophos Client Name: Lane End Developments Construction Ltd Curtins Consulting Limited 17-19 Whitworth Street West Manchester M1 5WG Tel: 0161 236 2394 Email: [email protected] www.curtins.com CIVILS & STRUCTURES • TRANSPORT PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • INFRASTRUCTURE • GEOTECHNICAL • CONSERVATION & HERITAGE • PRINCIPAL DESIGNER Birmingham • Bristol • Cambridge • Cardiff • Douglas • Dublin • Edinburgh • Glasgow • Kendal • Leeds • Liverpool • London • Manchester • Nottingham 078461-CUR-00-XX-RP-TP-001-V01 Lane End, Northern Gateway, Flintshire Transport Assessment Control Sheet This report has been prepared for the sole benefit, use, and information for the client. The liability of Curtins with respect to the information contained in the report will not extend to any third party. Author Signature Date Fred Frempong BSc (Hons) MSc MCIHT 15 March 2021 Principal Transport Planner Reviewed Signature Date Aaron Tilley CMILT FCIHT 15 March 2021 Associate Authorised Signature Date Alex Vogt BSc (Hons) MSc FCIHT 15 March 2021 Director of Transport Planning Rev V01 | Copyright © 2021 Curtins Consulting Ltd Page i 078461-CUR-00-XX-RP-TP-001-V01 Lane End, Northern Gateway, Flintshire Transport Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................
  • Hsuk London Terminal Strategy

    Hsuk London Terminal Strategy

    HSUK LONDON TERMINAL STRATEGY In the development of high speed rail systems, the issue of terminal location and onward distribution of passengers assumes almost as much importance as the more obvious question of route. The new lines are designed to carry large volumes of passengers on trains operating at high frequencies, and these factors combine to create major flows arriving at city terminals which must then be efficiently dispersed onto the local public transport networks. This demands full integration of high speed and local systems, with optimised transfer at dedicated and fit-for- purpose terminals. These issues apply at all UK cities where high speed lines are planned, but are most acute in London, where passenger flows are greatest, and congestion in the existing public transport system is most critical. The following diagrams review existing central London connectivity issues, and compare and contrast the London terminal solutions proposed for HS2, and for the alternative High Speed UK proposals. For precise details of the core High Speed UK proposals (as included in the cost estimates), see the ‘200k’ series of plans. LTS1 : LONDON MAIN LINE NETWORK CIRCA 1963 LTS2 : EXISTING CENTRAL LONDON RAIL NETWORK INCLUDING CROSSRAIL SCHEME These diagrams show the rail network of central London, dominated by the classic terminus stations of the Victorian era. These are mostly reliant for onward connectivity upon the Tube network, which tended to form ‘nodes’ around the busier/more important termini. However, the change from main line to Tube is inherently inefficient, with passengers forced to detrain en masse, and with massive congestion occurring especially at rush hours.