(CE:2322B-2324A) WISSA WASSEF (1873-1931), Egyptian Politician

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(CE:2322B-2324A) WISSA WASSEF (1873-1931), Egyptian Politician (CE:2322b-2324a) WISSA WASSEF (1873-1931), Egyptian politician. He was born in Tahta in Upper Egypt. In 1880 his family moved to Cairo, where Wissa finished his secondary education in foreign language schools, which then were numerous in Cairo. His achievement won him a scholarship to France in 1889. In Paris he was admitted to the Ecole normale primaire de Versailles. Three years later he joined the Ecole normale supérieure de St. Cloud, where in 1894 he obtained the teaching qualifications from these schools. Back in Egypt, he became a teacher of science at Ra’s al-Tin School in Alexandria. An ardent patriot, he watched the heavy hand applied by the British colonial administration as all schools came under the supervision of British inspectors. Harassed by one of the inspectors, the young Wissa decided to study law as a means of combating British policies toward education. In the summer of 1902 he departed for France to take his exams. Consequently, he resigned his post as teacher and was the first Egyptian to be admitted as a lawyer before the Mixed Tribunal in Cairo. In 1904 he started publishing articles in English in The Egyptian Gazette, established a private law practice, and joined the faculty of the French School of Law in Cairo. In 1925 he resigned from the Mixed Tribunal and devoted himself entirely to politics. Wissa Wassef joined the Egyptian Nationalist Party in 1906, inspired by the leader Mustafa Kamil, whose ideas and ideals he shared. He was the first Egyptian Christian to join the party and was followed by a colleague, Murqus Hanna, later to become one of its executive members. He was stigmatized by the Coptic community for joining a party that advocated allegiance to the Ottoman empire, an unacceptable choice to the Copts, whose rights had been completely ignored by the Sublime Porte (government offices in Istanbul during the reign of the sultan). On 16 June 1908, in a series of articles in the organ of the Nationalist Party, Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Aziz Jawish attacked the Copts, accusing them of considering "Islam a foreign religion in its own country." Wissa Wassef and Murqus Hanna resigned from the party as religious tensions rose. The assassination of Boutros Ghali Pasha by a fanatic Muslim led to the convening of the COPTIC CONGRESS OF ASYUT in March 1911. When the Wafd Party, headed by SA‘D ZAGHLUL, came into existence soon after the armistice in 1918, the Copts sought to be represented in it, and the choice fell on Wissa Wassef, who declined in favor of Wasif Boutros Ghali. Differences with the British colonialists soon led to the exile of Sa‘d Zaghlul and members of his party to Malta. Wissa Wassef was recruited as counselor to the group because of his oratorical skills, his perfect French, and his thorough knowledge of the "Egyptian question." Following that meeting, he was unanimously proclaimed full member of the Wafd and thereafter actively participated in the struggle against British rule. When Sa‘d Zaghlul was deported to the Seychelles for a second term of exile (1921-1923), Wissa Wassef along with Wasif Ghali took control of the Wafd and advocated Egypt's boycott of all British goods. In response British authorities incarcerated Wissa Wassef. After being released a few days later, he again incited the population to fight the British occupiers, whereupon he was arrested once more, brought before a military court, and sentenced to death. The sentence was later commuted to seven years in prison and a fine of five thousand pounds. He in fact served ten months and paid a fine of fifteen hundred pounds. His liberation, together with the return of Sa‘d Zaghlul and other detainees from the Seychelles, relaxed the tension between British authorities and Egyptian nationalists. Martial law was abrogated and the constitution promulgated on 19 April 1923 was accepted by the Wafd. Elections gave the Wafd a landslide victory and Wissa Wassef became deputy of Matariyyat al- Manzalah in the Delta, where he owned land. The proposal of his nomination as minister of education was rejected by King FOUAD on the ground that a Christian could not head an Islamic institution such as Al-Azhar University. After the assassination of the sirdar, Parliament was closed and new elections ordered. The Wafd was once again victorious and, although Sa‘d Zaghlul was rejected as prime minister by the British, he won the presidency of the Chamber of Deputies. Serving with him as vice-presidents were Wissa Wassef and MUSTAFA AL- NAHHAS. Wissa Wassef championed many social, educational, and cultural projects. When Sa‘d Zaghlul died on 24 August 1927, Wissa Wassef was nominated as his successor as speaker of the House. Wissa Wassef decided to pursue the cause of an independent Egypt internationally. In August 1928 he went to Berlin via Paris, despite obstacles set up by the government of Egypt to stop him and the group he headed from attending the twenty-fifth Inter- parliamentary Conference. This was an occasion for him to attack the intolerable meddlings of the British colonialists in Egypt's parliamentary affairs. Subsequent to his speech of 24 August, it was unanimously decided to call that day the Day of the Oppressed Nations. The following day, 25 August 1928, an act condemning suspension of parliamentary governments was signed by representatives of thirty-eight nations, including Britain. That day was called the Egyptian Day. At the conference that followed in London in July 1930, the secretary-general of the Parliamentary Union emphasized international concern over parliamentary freedoms, citing Egypt's stand at the 1928 Berlin conference as an example of success. Some sort of stabilization seemed to follow with the coming to power of the Labour Party in London in May 1929, which authorized new elections in Egypt. The Wafd won by a landslide— 230 of the 235 seats—and the opening parliamentary session on 11 June 1930 gave a vote of confidence to Wissa Wassef, reinstating him with a comfortable majority as president of the Chamber of Deputies. In thanking his colleagues, he made a plea to all patriots to join hands in working toward national unity. These events, however, met with opposition from King Fouad causing Nahhas Pasha to resign. Sidqi Pasha was nominated in his stead and issued new decrees restricting parliamentary activities. When protests followed, Sidqi Pasha ordered the doors of Parliament to be locked with chains. Wissa Wassef was put under house arrest. Outmaneuvering the guards around his house, however, he reached the Parliament buildings, where members of the House were already gathered. He ordered the guards to break the chains, which had been installed in violation of the constitution, denouncing this step as illegal interference by Sidqi Pasha. He then read the decrees issued by Sidqi Pasha to the assembled members of Parliament, who renewed their allegiance to the constitution. Wassef then called a meeting of Parliament for 21 July. This won him the epithet the "Chain-breaker." The situation in Egypt was reaching an explosive state, as was made apparent by Wissa Wassef in the Interparliamentary Conference held in London on 14 July 1930, as well as at a meeting of the League for Human Rights on July 30 of that year in Paris. Meanwhile, a new constitution issued in October 1930 without a referendum was denounced by the Wafd and the Liberal Movement, who decided to boycott the elections of May 1931. Violent demonstrations followed these events. On 27 May 1931, Wissa Wassef died of food poisoning, said by some to have been intentional. His funeral was attended by over a million people, proof of the popularity he had gained. [See also: Political Parties.] BIBLIOGRAPHY ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Rafi‘i. Thawrat Sanat 1919. Cairo, 1946. Ahmad, J. M. The Intellectual Origins of Egyptian Nationalism. London and New York, 1960; repr., 1968. Darwin, J. Britain, Egypt and the Middle East: Imperial Policy in the Aftermath of War, 1918-1922. London, 1961. Ghali, M. B. The Policy of Tomorrow. Washington, 1953. Muhammad Ahmad Amin. Dirasat fi Watha’iq Thawrat 1919. Cairo, 1963. Quraishi, Z. M. Liberal Nationalism in Egypt: Rise and Fall of the Wafd. Allahabad, 1967. Rifaat, M. The Awakening of Modern Egypt. Lahore, 1976. Tignor, R. Modernization and British Rule in Egypt, 1882-1914. Princeton, N.J., 1966. CÉRÈS WISSA WASSEF.
Recommended publications
  • History-Writing and Nation-Building in Nasser's Egypt Mona Arif
    Shorofat 1 Constructing the National Past: History-Writing and Nation-Building in Nasser’s Egypt Mona Arif is a scholarly refereed series specialized in humanities and social sciences, Shorofat 1 and issued by the Futuristic Studies Unit, Strategic Studies Program at the Bibliotheca Alexandrina. Board Chair Mostafa El Feki Editor-in-Chief Khaled Azab Shorofat 1 Editors Omneya El Gamil Aia Radwan Language Revision Perihan Fahmy Graphic Design Mohamed Shaarawy Constructing the National Past History-Writing and Nation-Building in Nasser’s Egypt Mona Arif The views in Shorofat represent the views of the author, not those of the Bibliotheca Alexandrina. Futuristic Studies Unit Bibliotheca Alexandrina Shorofat 1 Constructing the National Past: History-Writing and Nation-Building in Nasser’s Egypt Bibliotheca Alexandrina Cataloging-in-Publication Data Arif, Mona. Constructing the national past history-writing and nation-building in Nasser’s Egypt / Mona Arif. – Alexandria, Egypt : Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Futuristic Studies Unit, 2017. Pages ; cm. (Shorofat ; 1) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 9782-448-452-977- 1. Nasser, Gamal Abdel, 19182 .1970-. Egypt -- History -- 19521970-. I. Futuristic Studies Unit (Bibliotheca Alexandrina) II. Title. II. Series. 962.053--dc23 2017853316 ISBN: 978-977-452-448-2 Dar El-Kuttub Depository No.: 20671/2017 © 2017 Bibliotheca Alexandrina. All rights reserved. COMMERCIAL REPRODUCTION Reproduction of multiple copies of materials in this publication, in whole or in part, for the purposes of commercial redistribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Bibliotheca Alexandrina. To obtain permission to reproduce materials in this publication for commercial purposes, please contact the Bibliotheca Alexandrina, P.O. Box 138, Chatby 21526, Alexandria, Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing with Fire. the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian
    Playing with Fire.The Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian Leviathan Daniela Pioppi After the fall of Mubarak, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) decided to act as a stabilising force, to abandon the street and to lend democratic legiti- macy to the political process designed by the army. The outcome of this strategy was that the MB was first ‘burned’ politically and then harshly repressed after having exhausted its stabilising role. The main mistakes the Brothers made were, first, to turn their back on several opportunities to spearhead the revolt by leading popular forces and, second, to keep their strategy for change gradualist and conservative, seeking compromises with parts of the former regime even though the turmoil and expectations in the country required a much bolder strategy. Keywords: Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood, Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, Arab Spring This article aims to analyse and evaluate the post-Mubarak politics of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in an attempt to explain its swift political parable from the heights of power to one of the worst waves of repression in the movement’s history. In order to do so, the analysis will start with the period before the ‘25th of January Revolution’. This is because current events cannot be correctly under- stood without moving beyond formal politics to the structural evolution of the Egyptian system of power before and after the 2011 uprising. In the second and third parts of this article, Egypt’s still unfinished ‘post-revolutionary’ political tran- sition is then examined. It is divided into two parts: 1) the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF)-led phase from February 2011 up to the presidential elections in summer 2012; and 2) the MB-led phase that ended with the military takeover in July 2013 and the ensuing violent crackdown on the Brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • •C ' CONFIDENTIAL EGYPT October 8, 1946 Section 1 ARCHIVE* J 4167/39/16 Copy No
    THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOYERNMENT •C ' CONFIDENTIAL EGYPT October 8, 1946 Section 1 ARCHIVE* J 4167/39/16 Copy No. LEADING PERSONALITIES IN EGYPT Mr. Bowker to Mr. Bevin. (Received 8th October) (No. 1051. Confidential) 53. Ibrahim Abdul Hadi Pasha. Sir, Cairo, 30th September, 1946 54. Maitre Abdel Hamid Abdel Hakk. With reference to Mr. Farquhar's despatch 55. Nabil Abbas Halim. No. 1205 of-29th August, 1945, I have the honour 56. Maitre Ahmed Hamza. to transmit a revised list of personalities in Egypt. 57. Abdel Malek Hamza Bey. I have, &c. 58. El Lewa Mohammed Saleh Harb Pasha. JAMES BOWKEE. 59. Mahmoud Hassan Pasha. 60. Mohammed Abdel Khalek Hassouna Pasha. 61. Dr. Hussein Heikal Pasha. Enclosure 62. Sadek Henein Pasha. INDEX 63. Mahmoud Tewfik el-Hifnawi Pasha. 64. Neguib el-Hilaly Pasha. I.—Egyptian Personalitits 65. Ahmed Hussein Effendi. 1. Fuad Abaza Pasha. 66. Dr. Tahra Hussein. 2. Ibrahim Dessuki Abaza Pasha. 67. Dr. Ali Ibrahim Pasha, C.B.E. 3. Maitre Mohammed Fikri Abaza. 68. Kamel Ibrahim Bey. 4. Mohammed Ahmed Abboud Pasha. 69. Mohammed Hilmy Issa Pasha. 5. Dr. Hafez Afifi Pasha. 70. Aziz Izzet Pasha, G.C.V.O. 6. Abdel Kawi Ahmed Pasha. 71. Ahmed Kamel Pasha. 7. Ibrahim Sid Ahmed Bey. 72. ,'Lewa Ahmed Kamel Pasha. 8. Murad Sid Ahmed Pasha. 73. Ibrahim Fahmy Kerim Pasha. 9. Ahmed All Pasha, K.C.V.O. 74. Mahmoud Bey Khalil. 10. Prince Mohammed All, G.C.B., G.C.M.G. 75. Ahmed Mohammed Khashaba Pasha. 11. Tarraf Ali Pasha.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Policy of Egypt Under Hosni Mubarak
    Mubarak Matters: The Foreign Policy of Egypt Under Hosni Mubarak by Eric Fillinger SIS Honors Capstone Supervised by Professors Kristin Smith Diwan and Linda Lubrano Submitted to the School of International Service American University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with University Honors in International Studies Bachelor of Arts Degree May 2009 Abstract The goal of this research is to identify how Egypt defines its national interest and how it uses its foreign policy to promote this interest during the presidency of Hosni Mubarak. The capstone paper achieves this objective through an examination of three case studies—the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War, the 1991 Persian Gulf War, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Neoclassical realism is the primary theoretical framework for the project, combined with insights from analyses of foreign policy decision making. The use of both research traditions provides a more complete understanding of how Mubarak executes foreign policy. Such a study is needed because available scholarly work on the topic of Egyptian foreign policy during Mubarak’s time in office is scarce and is not focused on Egypt’s definition of its national interest. Research for the project was conducted with primary sources, such as newspaper editorials and documents from the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as scholarly articles that analyze and critique Egyptian foreign policy. The results indicate that Egyptian foreign policy is determined by Mubarak’s desire to guarantee the influence and power of Egypt throughout the region, as well as a need for Mubarak to guarantee the security of his regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundary Dispute Between Kuwait and Iraq Has It Subsided?
    LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY THE BOUNDARY DISPUTE BETWEEN KUWAIT AND IRAQ HAS IT SUBSIDED? By MAHA ALKENAEE A thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Affairs School of Arts and Sciences August 2011 L E B A N E S E A M E R I C A N U NIVERSITY School of Arts and Sciences - Beirut Campus Thesis Approval Form Student Name: Maha Alkenaee I.D. #: 200400150 Thesis Title The Boundary Dispute Between Kuwait and Iraq Has it Subsided? Program : Master of Arts in International Affairs Department : Social Sciences School : School of Arts and Sciences ii iii iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research would not have been possible without the help and assistance of many persons. I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Sami Baroudi who has been a great support throughout all stages of my postgraduate studies. I am also deeply grateful to all of my professors in the Lebanese American University from whom I have learned an abundant amount of knowledge. v To my loving family vi THE BOUNDARY DISPUTE BETWEEN KUWAIT AND IRAQ HAS IT SUBSIDED? Maha Kenaee Abstract This thesis attempts three related tasks. First, it surveys the historic record which provides uncontestable evidence that Kuwait was never part of the Ottoman Empire and thus never formed a single administrative or political unit with Iraq or part of it. Second, it traces the turbulent history of Kuwait‟s relationship with Iraq ever since the latter achieved independence in 1932; arguing that this turbulent relationship invited the intervention of regional and international players due to the strategic importance of Kuwait, especially since the discovery of oil.
    [Show full text]
  • President Clinton's Meetings & Telephone Calls with Foreign
    President Clinton’s Meetings & Telephone Calls with Foreign Leaders, Representatives, and Dignitaries from January 23, 1993 thru January 19, 20011∗ 1993 Telephone call with President Boris Yeltsin of Russia, January 23, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin of Israel, January 23, 1993, White House Telephone call with President Leonid Kravchuk of Ukraine, January 26, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, January 29, 1993, White House Telephone call with Prime Minister Suleyman Demirel of Turkey, February 1, 1993, White House Meeting with Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel of Germany, February 4, 1993, White House Meeting with Prime Minister Brian Mulroney of Canada, February 5, 1993, White House Meeting with President Turgut Ozal of Turkey, February 8, 1993, White House Telephone call with President Stanislav Shushkevich of Belarus, February 9, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with President Boris Yeltsin of Russia, February 10, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with Prime Minister John Major of the United Kingdom, February 10, 1993, White House Telephone call with Chancellor Helmut Kohl of Germany, February 10, 1993, White House declassified in full Telephone call with UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, February 10, 1993, White House 1∗ Meetings that were only photo or ceremonial events are not included in this list. Meeting with Foreign Minister Michio Watanabe of Japan, February 11, 1993,
    [Show full text]
  • No Longer Dhimmis: How European Intervention in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Empowered Copts in Egypt
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences 2012 No Longer Dhimmis: How European Intervention in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Empowered Copts in Egypt Patrick Victor Elyas University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Part of the Islamic World and Near East History Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, and the Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Elyas, Patrick Victor, "No Longer Dhimmis: How European Intervention in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Empowered Copts in Egypt" 01 January 2012. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/156. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/156 For more information, please contact [email protected]. No Longer Dhimmis: How European Intervention in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Empowered Copts in Egypt Abstract This paper will examine how European intervention in Egypt from Napoleon's occupation in 1798 to the departure of the monarchy in 1952 changed the social landscape of the country. Through Napoleonic decrees, diplomatic pressure, influence on the Mohammad Ali dynasty, and the expansion of European missionary education in Egypt, European involvement in Egyptian affairs was essential in allowing Copts and other Christians to reverse centuries
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Fromcairo Bi-Monthly Perioidical/Sixth-Special Issue /November 2015
    letter fromCairo Bi-monthly Perioidical/Sixth-Special Issue /November 2015 Egypt in Security Council to support Africa & World Peace 1 العدد الخامس اكتوبر" 2015 " Bi-monthly PerioidicalSixth-Special Issue /November 2015 Table of contents Letter from Cairo A Bi-Monthly Periodical on the p 4 current political, economic, and cultural developments in Egypt Urgent causes await Egypt and top priority Issued by Foreign Information Sector State Information Service given to African, Arab Arab Republic of Egypt & development issues Board Chairman Ambassador p 13 Salah A Elsadek President Sisi: Your confidence in Egypt’s role will be Editor-in-Chief well-placed Abdel Mo'ti Abu Zeid Executive Editor Nashwa Abdel Hamid p 18 Egyptian senior diplomat, Editors Dr. Boutros Boutros Mostafa Ahmady Ghali Layout p 23 Nisreen Ahmed The pyramids and Cairo Tower in blue on the 70th anniversary of the UN SIS Website: http://sis.gov.eg Email: [email protected] 2 Editorial Egypt’s uncontested non-permanent seat at UN Security Council is a well-deserved win Egypt won a non-permanent member seat at the United Nations Se- curity Council (UNSC) for the 2016-2017 term. In the voting session, Egypt secured the votes of 179 of the 193 nations entitled to vote at the UN. Egypt ran for the North Africa seat unopposed and now represents Africa along with Senegal. This is the sixth time Egypt is voted as a non- permanent Security Council member. The Foreign Ministry has put its full weight behind the campaign. Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry flew to New York in April to promote Egypt’s cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt: the Trial of Hosni Mubarak Questions and Answers
    Egypt: The Trial of Hosni Mubarak Questions and Answers May 2012 Hosni Mubarak, 84, became president of Egypt after the assassination of Anwar Sadat in October 1981, and served until he was ousted on February 11, 2011, following the large- scale pro-democracy protests that began on January 25 (the “January 25 protests”). A career military officer and commander of the Egyptian Air Force, he had been named vice- president in 1975. 1. What are the charges against Mubarak? Mubarak is charged with complicity in the murder and attempted murder of hundreds of peaceful demonstrators protesting his rule in Cairo, Alexandria, Suez, and several other Egyptian governorates between January 25 and January 31, 2011, under Articles 40(2), 45, 230, 231, and 235 of the Egyptian Penal Code. Although there were further injuries and deaths in the continuing protests against Mubarak’s rule after January 31 and prior to his departure, the charges only concern events though January 31. Article 40(2) establishes criminal liability for any person who agrees with another to commit a crime that takes place on the basis of such agreement. Article 45 defines “attempt” as the beginning of carrying out an act with the intent to commit a crime. Articles 230 and 231 provide that the death penalty is the punishment for premeditated murder. Article 235 specifies that the accomplices to premeditated murder shall be sentenced to death or life in prison. That said, it should be noted that Penal Code article 17 gives the court discretion to substitute a prison sentence for a death sentence and a lesser sentence for a sentence of life in prison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suez Company's Concession in Egypt, 1854-1956: Modern Infrastructure and Local Economic Development
    The Suez Company's Concession in Egypt, 1854-1956: Modern Infrastructure and Local Economic Development Caroline Piquet Enterprise & Society, Volume 5, Number 1, March 2004, pp. 107-127 (Article) Published by Cambridge University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/53850 Access provided by University of Chicago (6 Jun 2017 19:33 GMT) Khh005.fm Page 107 Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:55 AM The Suez Company’s Concession in Egypt, 1854–1956: Modern Infrastructure and Local Economic Development CAROLINE PIQUET For over a century in Egypt, the Suez Canal Company reflected the role of the concession in European economic expansion overseas. Concession was a European business practice widespread in Egypt; it was an institution inherited from a system of privileges for Europeans since the Middle Ages. It promised a way for Egypt to adopt modern infrastructures and receive needed European help for digging the canal. The results of the Suez Company are indis- putable: the desert of the Suez Isthmus became a lively economic region with active ports, growing cities, and an expanding labor force. And the region was linked to the rest of the country by a new road network. At the same time, however, the concession sys- tem denied Egypt full benefit of this infrastructure. The canal served the financial and strategic interests of the company, not the interests of the local economy. This outcome embodied all the contradictions of the concession system: on the one hand, conces- sions were a necessity for modern infrastructure development in Egypt; on the other, they were a hindrance to further national eco- nomic development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Copts
    The American University in Cairo School of Global Affairs and Public Policy (GAPP) The Other Copts: Between Sectarianism, Nationalism and Catholic Coptic Activism in Minya A Thesis submitted to the Middle East Studies Center In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (M.A.) in Middle East Studies By Ana Carol Torres Gutiérrez Under the supervision of Dr. Sandrine Gamblin Spring 2017 The American University in Cairo School of Global Affairs and Public Policy "The Other Copts: Between Sectarianism, Nationalism and Catholic Coptic Activism in Minya” A thesis submitted by Ana Carol Torres Gutiérrez to the Middle East Studies Centre Spring 2017 In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Middle East Studies has been approved by: Dr. Sandrine Gamblin Thesis Adviser _______________________________________________ Affiliation _________________________________________________ Dr. Reem Saad Thesis Second Reader ________________________________________ Affiliation _________________________________________________ Dr. Adam Duker Thesis Third Reader _________________________________________ Affiliation _________________________________________________ Dr. Robert Mason Department Chair _____________________________ Date: ____________ Nabil Fahmy, Ambassador Dean of GAPP _____________________________ Date: ____________ ii Abstract The Other Copts: Between Sectarianism, Nationalism and Catholic Coptic Activism in Minya Ana Carol Torres Gutiérrez Under the supervision of Dr. Sandrine
    [Show full text]
  • Boutros Ghali Pasha — a Controversial Politician of British-Era Egypt
    Boutros Ghali Pasha — a controversial politician of British-era Egypt ROLAND GÖMÖRI UNIVERSITY SZEGED Introduction In the history of Egypt under British occupation, one of the more influential figures of the period was Boutros Ghali Pasha. Having been the first Coptic prime minister of Egypt, and having assumed influential positions in Egyptian affairs beforehand, his life and legacy need to be examined in detail in order to better understand the Egyptian politics of the era. The legacy of Boutros Ghali is certainly contentious: while some Coptic historians re- gard him as a politician who always had Egyptian interests in mind, Egyptian nationalists of the era accused him of being troublingly sympathetic towards the British occupiers. Being assassinated by a fervent nationalist, his untimely demise stirred up waves in the already tense Egyptian political atmosphere that would last for years. In the following essay, the author will attempt to thoroughly present the career of the aforementioned Coptic Egyptian statesman, and through it, answer the main issue regarding Boutros Ghali: was he an Egyptian nationalist or a collaborator with the British? Or perhaps neither, assuming the most ungrateful position of mediator, trying to settle differences be- tween the interested parties in order to avoid conflict. His early life Boutros Ghali was born in 1846, but according to Goldschmidt, the information about his birthplace is far from being unambiguous: he was either born in Cairo, or in Maymun - a small village in the Beni Suef governorate, the same governorate where the Ghali family possessed land. His father was the steward of the estate of Egyptian prince Mustafa Fadil.1 Boutros Ghali received extensive education.
    [Show full text]