DOCSLIB.ORG

Well Regulation in the South Platte River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Well Regulation in the South Platte River Basin Well Regulation in the South Platte River Basin South Platte River Basin Task Force June 29, 2007 Union Colony Civic Center Greeley, Colorado Dick Wolfe, M.S., P.E. www.water.state.co.us WhatWhat DefinesDefines thethe SouthSouth PlattePlatte RiverRiver System?System? • This physical system is defined by the geographic boundaries of the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado extending from the surface to the base of the alluvial ground water aquifers. InflowInflow –– OutflowOutflow == ChangeChange inin StorageStorage InflowInflow OutflowOutflow Precipitation (snow and Evapotranspiration rain) Evaporation Transmountain water Stream flow out of the imports system Return flows from Depletions associated bedrock ground water with human activities aquifers (NT, NNT) Recharge to bedrock Stream flow into the aquifers system Ground water outflow Ground water inflow ChangeChange inin StorageStorage AlluvialAlluvial storagestorage capacitycapacity (3.4(3.4 MAFMAF unsaturatedunsaturated andand 13.613.6 MAFMAF saturated)saturated) ReservoirReservoir storagestorage capacitycapacity (1.77(1.77 MAFMAF activeactive andand 3.463.46 MAFMAF conditional)conditional) COLORADO HISTORICAL AVERAGE ANNUAL STREAM FLOWS 403,400 311,100 (acre feet) 111,800 E K L 414,300 A E A N T R 404,600 T A S 265,800 A M 99,500 E K L L I L E T E P 1,127,000 IT . O C 1,531,000 L AC 875,600 N HE YAMPA LA PO 634,500 UD RE 334,400 158,800 TTE ST PLA . VRA TH 6 476,300 45,590 IN SOU 31,680 WHITE 54,760 404,400 P 229,200 85,540 NORTH FORK I DER C BOUL REPUBLICAN E 204,400 555,200 27,700 A 329,200 N 185,200 50,050 C BLUE E 33,760 413,200 1 N BEA ICA 28,750 EAGLE R 270,500 BL PU RE N RK 5 879,800 O. FORK O H F At Benkelman, NE ROARING 126,800 UT SO COLORADO FORK 58,146 2,799,000 88,051 63,038 4,500,000 279,70 RK FO 0 NO. 330,500 N I 547,300 A 1,872,000 943,000 T 505,600 N 528,200 U 69,750 2 O F D 699,200 WEST TOWARD PACIFIC OCEAN 8,867,450 af 8,867,450 OCEAN PACIFIC TOWARD WEST 219,800 O GUNNISON L U O A N 125,100 RK af 1,373,000 OCEAN ATLANTIC TOWARD EAST R C AN E S 89,820 E 172,000 O TOMICHI A S P S S M 164,200 A A N P R M A 26,930 H IG 4 G U G 3 E R L 24,933 E 394,300 HUERFANO 18,970 A 653,300 P 153,000 A E 47,020 H R 96,300 IS I 313,200 RI O O G P T RA A A 152,600 N G 593,600 H DE T R 7 A U U K D P O I R S O McELMO R F S 291,20 37,100 O A A L R S O T 0 A 49,640 31,890 F D N A N I IE CONEJOS L & N P J 322,100 P A P U S S S U A MANCO J N A O LA - L M C I AN S H N A M A 268,600 A 235,800 36,890 25,580 446,900 94,180 670,100 173,700 + 291,200 TOTAL LEAVING COLORADO 10,240,500 af Prepared by the Hydrographic Branch (2003 Revision) OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Historic averages obtained from USGS Water-Data Report CO-02 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES State of Colorado, Division of Water Resources, Division 1, South Platte River Drainage. # 76 SEDGWICK Logan Sedgwick 3 Priority Dates 48 NUNN # Of Controlling Larimer 64 STERLING # HOLYOKE Water Rights FORT CO LLINS # # Weld Phillips 4 GREELEY # Early 1860’s # ESTES PARK FORT MORGAN # 65 Late 1860’s YUMA To Early 5 KEENESBURG Morgan # WRAY Boulder # # 1870’s # 2 Yuma BOULDER Washington Early 1880’s 6 1 Adams Gilpin Late 1880’s BENNE TT DENVER # To Mid-1890’s 7 # Clear Creek Denver 9 Arapahoe Jefferson 8 CASTLE ROCK Lincoln # Kit Carson 80 Elbert FLAGLER Douglas # 49 Park 23 El Paso WOODLAND PARK # Teller Cheyenne # Cities Division 1 Boundary N Division 1 Districts Division 1 Counties W E Main Rivers S South Platte River Compact April 27, 1923 Key Provisions • Divides South Platte River Basin into “Upper Section” and “Lower Section • South Platte River Compact applies only in “Lower Section” (Washington County line to State Line, District 64) • Flow of river is measured flow of Julesburg gage plus inflow below gage and above Western Canal diversion • Between April 1 and October 15, Colorado shall not permit diversions with appropriation dates junior to June 14, 1897 when the flow of the river is less than 120 cfs unless the diversions are augmented • Colorado has the right to the full and uninterrupted use of the waters of the South Platte River from October 16 to March 31 SouthSouth PlattePlatte RiverRiver BasinBasin HydrologyHydrology NativeNative flowsflows forfor totaltotal basinbasin estimatedestimated toto bebe 1,400,0001,400,000 acreacre--feetfeet annuallyannually byby thethe USGSUSGS TransmountainTransmountain waterwater providesprovides approximatelyapproximately anotheranother 400,000400,000 acreacre--feetfeet perper yearyear GroundGround waterwater pumpingpumping fromfrom highhigh capacitycapacity alluvialalluvial wellswells locatedlocated alongalong thethe SouthSouth PlattePlatte RiverRiver areare estimatedestimated toto provideprovide overover 500,000500,000 acreacre--feetfeet annuallyannually TotalTotal annualannual surfacesurface waterwater diversionsdiversions equalequal approximatelyapproximately 4,000,0004,000,000 acreacre--feetfeet SouthSouth PlattePlatte RiverRiver BasinBasin IrrigationIrrigation • Approximately 1 million irrigated acres – Approximately 18% is served by ground water only – Approximately 27% is served by a combination of surface and ground water – Approximately 55% is served by surface water only Irrigated Area Along the South Platte River Sedgwick Logan Phillip s Weld Morgan Washington Yuma Clippeddiv1counties.shp Adams Denver Arapahoe N n W E S Linco ln TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1 2 3 R VE 4 RI STEAMBOAT 5 7 YA 6 SPRINGS 6 MPA R 8 IV E ER T T 9 A L P 41 TO COLORADO RIVER BASIN 10 SOUTH 40. DIVIDE HIGHLINE FEEDER DITCH 42 GREELEY 41. SARVIS DITCH 43 TO SOUTH PLATTE BASIN 42. STILLWATER DITCH 43. DOME DITCH 1. WILSON SUPPLY DITCH 44. REDLANDS POWER CANAL 11 2. DEADMAN DITCH 1 3. BOB CREEK DITCH 4. COLUMBINE DITCH 13 12 5. LARAMIE POUDRE TUNNEL 6. SKYLINE DITCH 14 DENVER 7. CAMERON PASS DITCH 5 20 19 18 IVER 22 21 8. MICHIGAN DITCH O R GLENWOOD RAD 9. GRAND RIVER DITCH OLO SPRINGS C 15 10. ALVA B. ADAMS TUNNEL 23 11. MOFFAT WATER TUNNEL GRAND JUNCTION 39 16 12. BERTHOUD PASS DITCH 17 13. STRAIGHT CREEK TUNNEL 40 24 14. VIDLER TUNNEL 15. HAROLD D. ROBERTS TUNNEL 16. BOREAS PASS DITCH 44 17. HOOSIER PASS TUNNEL R DELTA 4 E IV 2 R TO GUNNISON RIVER BASIN 25 ON 36. RED MOUNTAIN DITCH GUNNIS 37. CARBON LAKE DITCH PUEBLO TO ARKANSAS BASIN A 38. MINERAL POINT DITCH MONTROSE RKA 18. COLUMBINE DITCH NSA 39. LEON TUNNEL S R 19. EWING DITCH IVE R 20. WURTZ DITCH D 28 21. HOMESTAKE TUNNEL OL 29 22. CHARLES H. BOUSTEAD TUNNEL OR 23. BUSK-IVANHOE TUNNEL E 24. TWIN LAKES TUNNEL S R 38 25. LARKSPUR DITCH I V 37 26. HUDSON BRANCH DITCH E 36 26 R 3 27. MEDANO PASS DITCH RI 27 O GR AN 30 DE ALAMOSA 31 32 33 7 TO RIO GRANDE BASIN DURANGO 34 28. TARBELL DITCH 29. TABOR DITCH 30. WEMINUCHE PASS DITCH 35 31. PINE RIVER-WEMINUCHE PASS DITCH 32. WILLIAMS CREEK-SQUAW PASS DITCH 33. DON LA FONT DITCHES 1 & 2 Updated June 2005 34. TREASURE PASS DITCH 35. SAN JUAN-CHAMA PROJECT 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 Division 1 Diversions Amount (Ac-Ft) 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 - 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 Total Diversion 1990 Transmountain Diversions 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 South Platte River at Kersey Irrigation Water Year 3500 3000 2500 2000 Flow (cfs) 1500 1000 500 0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Historic* Mean Flow Historic* Min Flow 2006-2007 Mean Flow 2005-2006 Mean Flow *1901-2005 South Platte River at Julesburg Irrigation Water Year 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Flow (cfs) 600 400 200 0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Historic* Mean Flow Historic* Min Flow 2006-2007 Mean Flow 2005-2006 Mean Flow *1902-2005 South Platte River Basin Water Use 2005 Surface Water Use Breakdown Augmentation Recharge 7% 6% Industrial 4% Municipal 21% Irrigation 62% GeneralGeneral WellWell InformationInformation ApproximatelyApproximately 9,0009,000 decreeddecreed highhigh capacitycapacity wellswells inin SouthSouth PlattePlatte RiverRiver basinbasin andand itsits tributariestributaries onon record.record. LessLess inin actualactual existence.existence. HaveHave inventoriedinventoried approximatelyapproximately 7,4007,400 highhigh capacitycapacity wellswells StillStill verifyingverifying useuse ofof remainingremaining 1,6001,600 wellswells (verification(verification isis startingstarting nearnear thethe riverriver andand movingmoving awayaway fromfrom traditionaltraditional irrigatedirrigated areas;areas; itit isis estimatedestimated thatthat 80%80% ofof thesethese wellswells areare inin existence,existence, butbut onlyonly 15%15% areare beingbeing used)used) GeneralGeneral WellWell InformationInformation ForFor 2007,2007, thethe anticipatedanticipated numbernumber ofof DivisionDivision 11 SubstituteSubstitute WaterWater SupplySupply PlansPlans ((““SWSPsSWSPs””)) withwith wellswells thatthat willwill operateoperate inin 20072007 isis approximatelyapproximately 125.125. (This(This onlyonly includesincludes SWSPsSWSPs perper 3737--9292--308,308, C.R.S.,C.R.S., withwith wells.)wells.) ApproximatelyApproximately 1,3001,300 wellswells areare includedincluded inin thesethese 125125 plans.plans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Summit ACP FINAL Report.Pdf
    CO 9 SOUTH SUMMIT ACCESS STUDY SUMMIT COUNTY LINE (MP 77.49) TO BOREAS PASS RD (MP 86.26) DEC 2020 South Summit Colorado State Highway 9 Access and Conceptual Trail Design Study SOUTH SUMMIT COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 9 ACCESS AND CONCEPTUAL TRAIL DESIGN STUDY CO-9: M.P. 77.49 (Carroll Lane) to M.P. 86.26 (Broken Lance Drive/Boreas Pass Road) CDOT Project Code 22621 December 2020 Prepared for: Summit County 208 Lincoln Avenue Breckenridge, CO 80424 Bentley Henderson, Assistant Manager Town of Blue River 0110 Whispering Pines Circle Blue River, CO 80424 Michelle Eddy, Town Manager Town of Breckenridge 150 Ski Hill Road Breckenridge, CO 80424 Rick Holman, Town Manager Colorado Department of Transportation Region 3 – Traffic and Safety 222 South 6th Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Brian Killian, Permit Unit Manager Prepared by: Stolfus & Associates, Inc. 5690 DTC Boulevard, Suite 330W Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Michelle Hansen, P.E., Project Manager SAI Reference No. 1000.005.10, 4000.031, 4000.035, 4000.036 Stolfus & Associates, Inc. South Summit Colorado State Highway 9 Access and Conceptual Trail Design Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Background ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study Coordination ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    Analysis and Technical Update to the Colorado Water Plan Technical Memorandum Prepared for: Colorado Water Conservation Board Project Title: Current and 2050 Planning Scenario Water Supply and Gap Results Date: September 18, 2019 Prepared by: Wilson Water Group Reviewed by: Jacobs, Brown & Caldwell Technical Update Water Supply and Gap Results Table of Contents Section 1 : Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10 Section 2 : Definitions and Terminology ........................................................................................................ 11 Section 3 : SWSI 2010 Water Supply Methodology....................................................................................... 12 Section 4 : Technical Update Water Supply Methodology ............................................................................ 15 4.1 Current/Baseline Water Supply Methodology .......................................................................... 15 4.1.1 CDSS Basin Water Supply Methodology ..................................................................................... 16 4.1.2 Non-CDSS Basin Water Supply Methodology ............................................................................. 19 4.2 Planning Scenario A-E Water Supply Methodology .................................................................. 21 4.2.1 Planning Scenario Water Supply Adjustments ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Colorado Division of Water Resources
    Colorado Division of Water Resources Water Literate Leaders of Northern Colorado • October 02, 2019 • Corey DeAngelis, Division Engineer • Mark Simpson, Poudre Water Commissioner • Jean Lever, Thompson Water Commissioner • Water Resources • Water • Parks and Wildlife Conservation Board • Oil & Gas • Reclamation, Conservation Mining and Safety Commission • State Land Board • Avalanche Information Center • Forestry https://cdnr.us/ • The position of Water Commissioner was created by the Legislature in 1879 • The office of State Hydraulic Engineer was created by the Legislature in 1881 • State Engineer is Governor Appointed • State Engineer’s Office became part of DNR in 1969 www.water.state.co.us Division of Water Resources Roles and Responsibilities • Water Administration – Surface & Underground – Water Court Participation • Interstate Compacts and Decrees • Flow Measurement (Hydrographic Program) • Public Safety (Dams and Wells) • Water Well Permitting • Public Information Service/Record Keeping DWR Water Divisions & Offices Division 1 Water Districts Map South Platte Basin Hydrology • USGS estimates total basin native flows to average about 1,400,000 acre-feet annually • Transmountain water imports average about 400,000 acre-feet annually • Total annual surface water diversions average about 4,000,000 acre-feet annually TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1 2 3 STEAMBOAT 4 6 SPRINGS 5 6 7 30 8 TO COLORADO RIVER BASIN 31 GREELEY SOUTH 30. SARVIS DITCH 32 TO SOUTH PLATTE BASIN 31. STILLWATER DITCH 1. WILSON SUPPLY DITCH 32. DOME DITCH 9 2. DEADMAN DITCH 3. LARAMIE POUDRE TUNNEL 1 4. SKYLINE DITCH 5. CAMERON PASS DITCH 10 6. MICHIGAN DITCH 11 DENVER 7. GRAND RIVER DITCH 5 17 16 15 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Planning Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado
    Wildfire Planning Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Prepared for: The Town of Breckenridge P.O. Box 168 Breckenridge, CO 80424 Prepared by: 130 Ski Hill Road, Suite 100 Breckenridge, CO 80424 October 2015 Wildfire Planning Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Prepared for: The Town of Breckenridge P.O. Box 168 Breckenridge, CO 80424 Prepared by: 130 Ski Hill Road, Suite 100 Breckenridge, CO 80424 October 2015 Cover photograph: Goose Pasture Tarn and Indiana Creek watershed top left, Hayman watershed lower right Wildfire Planning: Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Wildfire Planning: Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Report Organization ...................................................................................................................... 1 Watershed and Geomorphic Characteristics of Indiana Creek ............................................................. 3 2.1 Water-quality Impacts from Wildfire............................................................................................ 3 2.2 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Hydrologic Impacts ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trails Plan | 2009 Town of Breckenridge | Trails Plan
    TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE | TRAILS PLAN | 2009 TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE | TRAILS PLAN TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE TRAILS PLAN Introduction 4 Plan Philosophy 4 Plan Prioritization 5 Plan Goals and Objectives 5 Role of the Plan 5 Plan Assumptions 6 Plan Implementation 6 Plan Organization 6 How This PlanW as Developed 6 Winter and Summer Elements 7 Disclaimer 7 Planning Areas 7 Area 1: Ski Hill Road/Peak 7/8 Base Area 7 Peaks Trailhead and Trails 7 Freeride Park 8 Shock Hill/Nordic Center 8 Cucumber Gulch Preserve 9 Claimjumper/Recreation Center Connection 9 Peak 7 Neighborhood Connection 10 New Nordic World/Peak 6 Expansion 10 Iowa Hill Trailhead 10 American Way Access 10 Area 2: Core/Upper Four Seasons Area 11 Riverwalk Connection 11 Klack Placer 11 The Cedars/Trails End Connection 11 F&D Placer to Burro Connection 12 Maggie Pond Access 12 Four O’Clock Ski Run 12 Timber Trail 12 Maggie Placer Trail 13 Area 3: Breckenridge South 13 Aspen Grove/Aspen Alley Trail 13 Wakefield Trailhead 13 Little Mountain 13 Blue River/Hoosier Pass Recpath 14 The Burro Trail Accesses 14 Bekkedal/Gold King (lots 1&2) to Burro Connection 14 Ski Area Equestrian Trails 14 Now Colorado/Silver Queen Connection 15 Riverwood Trail 15 PAGE 1 TRAILS PLAN | TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE | TRAILS PLAN Area 3: Breckenridge South (continued) Breckenridge Park Estates Trailhead 15 Fredonia Gulch Trailhead 16 Bemrose Ski Circus 16 Wheeler Trail Resurrection 16 Pennsylvania Gulch and Indiana Creek Road Winter Access 16 Spruce Creek Trail Spur 16 Lehman Gulch Trail 17 Monte Cristo
    [Show full text]
  • Boreas Pass Auto Tour Iron Rails: from Bust to Rust
    Boreas Pass Auto Tour Iron Rails: From Bust to Rust This series of auto tours crosses through National Forest lands and private landowners. Some of the historic mining sites may contain mine shafts and other dangerous mine workings, most of which are on private land. Visitors should exercise caution when leaving their vehicles. This 21 ½-mile tour begins 10 miles northeast of Fairplay at the junction of Highway 285 and Park County Road #33. CHRONOLOGY-BOREAS PASS 1803- Louisiana Territory, land west of Mississippi, purchased from the French 1805- John Purcell found gold in Tarryall Creek 1842- John C. Fremont led expedition into South Park to map Platte River 1849- California gold rush 1858-59- Depressed economy after Panic of 1857 sent gold- seekers west 1859- Colorado gold rush; major rind on Tarryall Creek and Blue River 1860-63- Placer mining peaked in South Park, California Gulch and the Blue River Country 1861-65- Civil War 1867- End of most small-claim placer mining 1871- Colorado silver strike 1871- Lechner found coal in South Park 1872- Denver, South Park and Pacific Railway spearheaded by John Evans 1877-79- Leadville silver boom 1879- Denver, South Park and Pacific Railroad reached South Park town of Como 1880- 24,000 people in Leadville, silver capital of the U.S 1882- Denver, South Park and Pacific Railroad reached town of Breckenridge 1884- Denver, South Park and Pacific Railroad reached Leadville over Boreas and Fremont Passes 1905- U.S. Forest Service created within Department of Agriculture 1907- Pike National Forest evolved from South Platte Forest Reserve 1937- Railroad shut down in South Park and over Boreas Pass 1952- Boreas railroad bed converted to an auto road on the Breckenridge side 1956- Boreas railroad bed converted to an auto road on the Como side 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver, South Park & Pacific Railroad
    Denver Public Library, Western History Department. History Western Library, Public Denver W.H. Rau, publisher, from C.S. Ryland Collection. Ryland C.S. from publisher, Rau, W.H. pulls away from the Nathrop Station, by Joseph Collier, courtesy of the the of courtesy Collier, Joseph by Station, Nathrop the from away pulls 1880’s. late the in Canon Platte lower of defile A passenger and cargo train of the Denver, South Park & Pacific Railroad Railroad Pacific & Park South Denver, the of train cargo and passenger A Denver South Park & Pacific 112 threads the narrow narrow the threads 112 Pacific & Park South Denver the original dream was never fully realized. realized. fully never was dream original the railroad system wholly contained within the state, state, the within contained wholly system railroad and the DSP&P became the largest narrow gauge gauge narrow largest the became DSP&P the and Although 335 miles of track were eventually laid laid eventually were track of miles 335 Although South Park & Pacific Railway Company in 1872. 1872. in Company Railway Pacific & Park South Denver’s leading businessmen formed The Denver Denver The formed businessmen leading Denver’s would outweigh the costs, Evans and a group of of group a and Evans costs, the outweigh would the challenge and convinced that the benefits benefits the that convinced and challenge the to achieve a functional rail line. Still undaunted by by undaunted Still line. rail functional a achieve to would require tunneling through tons of solid rock rock solid of tons through tunneling require would Excessive grades and treacherous winter weather weather winter treacherous and grades Excessive wagon roads and even foot trails seemed unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipomopsis Globularis (Brand) W.A
    Ipomopsis globularis (Brand) W.A. Weber (Hoosier Pass ipomopsis): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project March 15, 2005 Susan Spackman Panjabi and David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 8002 Campus Delivery — Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Panjabi, S.S. and D.G. Anderson (2005, March 15). Ipomopsis globularis (Brand) W.A. Weber (Hoosier Pass ipomopsis): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/ipomopsisglobularis.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Dr. Barry Johnston, William Jennings, Tim Hogan, Loraine Yeatts, Dr. Ron Hartman, and Dr. J. Mark Porter. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable, and their insights into the distribution, habitat, taxonomy, and ecology of Ipomopsis globularis were crucial to this project. Thanks also to Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, and Joy Bartlett for assisting with questions and project management. Jane Nusbaum and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Dr. J. Mark Porter provided critical literature on the taxonomic relationships within the genus Ipomopsis. Loraine Yeatts, Tim Hogan, Ron Abbott, Nancy Redner, Benjamin Madsen, and Kim Regier provided valuable insights based on their experiences with I. globularis. Sara Mayben and Benjamin Madsen provided information specific to the South Park Ranger District of the Pike- San Isabel National Forest. Gary Nichols offered insight regarding land use activities in Park County.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical View: Transmount Ain Diversion Development in Colorado
    A HISTORICAL VIEW: TRANSMOUNT AIN DIVERSION DEVELOPMENT IN COLORADO John N. Winchester, P.E.' ABSTRACT As the headwaters for seven major rivers, water resources in Colorado have been diverted for use for over ISO years. Transbasin diversions have been developed to move water from one river basin to another, including transmountain diversions, which move water over the continental divide. Transmountain diversions have historically been developed to provide water for irrigated agriculture and municipal purposes. This paper briefly discusses the development of each of Colorado's 30 transmountain diversions between the Colorado, South Platte, Arkansas and Rio Grande river basins, and provides a summary of diversions for recent years. INTRODUCTION Many people in the Colorado water community have traditionally divided transbasin diversions into two categories: transmountain diversions, which move water from one side of the continental divide to the other, and transbasin, where water is moved between basins that ultimately drain to the same ocean. In addition to surface water diversions, there are also geological formations that allow wells located in one basin to pump water native to another. BACKGROUND Based on the 2000 Census and the Colorado State Engineer's records, the front range of Colorado (the east slope, excluding the North Platte and Rio Grande basins) has 89% of the state's population but only 16% of the state's water (USCB, 2000; SE~, 2000). Because the front range and the eastern plains of Colorado are in a semi-arid environment, transmountain diversions, diversions from one side of the continental divide to the other, have been constructed to move water to the eastern slope to help satisfy the region's demand for water.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Pike and San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Water Transfers Between Basins
    Major Water Transfers Between Basins Michael Sullivan Colorado Division of Water Resources Flood Update High Velocity Flows Moving Big Rocks Colorado’s Major Basins and Subbasins Green Laramie North Yampa Platte White South Platte and Republican Colorado Gunnison San Miguel Arkansas Dolores Rio Grande Mancos San Juan La Plata Conejos TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1 2 3 R VE 4 RI STEAMBOAT 5 7 YA 6 SPRINGS 6 MPA R 8 IV E ER T T 9 A L P 41 TO COLORADO RIVER BASIN 10 SOUTH 40. DIVIDE HIGHLINE FEEDER DITCH 42 GREELEY 41. SARVIS DITCH 43 TO SOUTH PLATTE BASIN 42. STILLWATER DITCH 43. DOME DITCH 1. WILSON SUPPLY DITCH 44. REDLANDS POWER CANAL 11 2. DEADMAN DITCH 1 3. BOB CREEK DITCH 4. COLUMBINE DITCH 13 12 5. LARAMIE POUDRE TUNNEL 6. SKYLINE DITCH 14 DENVER 7. CAMERON PASS DITCH 5 20 19 18 IVER 22 21 8. MICHIGAN DITCH O R GLENWOOD RAD 9. GRAND RIVER DITCH OLO SPRINGS C 15 10. ALVA B. ADAMS TUNNEL 23 11. MOFFAT WATER TUNNEL GRAND JUNCTION 39 16 12. BERTHOUD PASS DITCH 17 13. STRAIGHT CREEK TUNNEL 40 24 14. VIDLER TUNNEL 15. HAROLD D. ROBERTS TUNNEL 16. BOREAS PASS DITCH 44 17. HOOSIER PASS TUNNEL R DELTA 4 E IV 2 R TO GUNNISON RIVER BASIN 25 ON 36. RED MOUNTAIN DITCH GUNNIS 37. CARBON LAKE DITCH PUEBLO TO ARKANSAS BASIN A 38. MINERAL POINT DITCH MONTROSE RKA 18. COLUMBINE DITCH NSA 39. LEON TUNNEL S R 19. EWING DITCH IVE R 20. WURTZ DITCH D 28 21.
    [Show full text]
  • G for Licenses Guaranteed to Hunters Due to Natural Disaster Relief + Number
    AS APPROVED – 01/13/2021 FINAL REGULATIONS - CHAPTER W-0 - GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE II - LICENSE TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS #001 - Hunt Codes A. Hunt Codes are a series of eight sequential letters and numbers which denote the species, sex of animal, unit number, season, and hunt type for each choice shown on the application: 1. Species - The first character of the hunt code is a letter denoting species: A for pronghorn B for black bear C for desert bighorn sheep D for deer E for elk G for mountain goat H for small game or furbearer L for mountain lion M for moose P for greater prairie-chicken S for rocky mountain bighorn sheep T for wild turkey 2. Sex of Animal - The second character of the hunt code is a letter denoting the sex of the animal for which the license is valid: E for either-sex (antlerless or antlered) of animal, as defined in #200 F for antlerless or doe animals, as defined in #200 M for antlered or buck animals, as defined in #200 3. Unit Number - The third through fifth characters are numbers denoting the unit or group of units in which the license is valid. Units are numbered sequentially beginning with the number 1. Zeros appear before the unit number when it is less than three characters in length, i.e. 001, 023, etc. Where the license is valid in more than one unit, the lowest numbered complete unit in the group is used, and the season table shows the complete list of valid units or portions thereof.
    [Show full text]