DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado Division of Water Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colorado Division of Water Resources Colorado Division of Water Resources • Water Literate Leaders of Northern Colorado • September 14, 2017 • Dave Nettles, Division Engineer • Mark Simpson, Poudre Water Commissioner • Jean Lever, Thompson Water Commissioner • Water Resources • Water • Parks and Wildlife Conservation Board • Oil & Gas • Reclamation, Conservation Mining and Safety Commission • State Land Board • Avalanche Information Center • Forestry https://cdnr.us/ • The position of Water Commissioner was created by the Legislature in 1879 • The office of State Hydraulic Engineer was created by the Legislature in 1881 • State Engineer is Governor Appointed • State Engineer’s Office became part of DNR in 1969 www.water.state.co.us Division of Water Resources Roles and Responsibilities • Water Administration – Surface & Underground – Water Court Participation • Interstate Compacts and Decrees • Flow Measurement (Hydrographic Program) • Public Safety (Dams and Wells) • Water Well Permitting • Public Information Service/Record Keeping DWR Water Divisions & Offices Division 1 Water Districts Map South Platte Basin Hydrology • USGS estimates total basin native flows to average about 1,400,000 acre-feet annually • Transmountain water imports average about 400,000 acre-feet annually • Total annual surface water diversions average about 4,000,000 acre-feet annually TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1 2 3 STEAMBOAT 4 6 SPRINGS 5 6 7 30 8 TO COLORADO RIVER BASIN 31 GREELEY SOUTH 30. SARVIS DITCH 32 TO SOUTH PLATTE BASIN 31. STILLWATER DITCH 1. WILSON SUPPLY DITCH 32. DOME DITCH 9 2. DEADMAN DITCH 3. LARAMIE POUDRE TUNNEL 1 4. SKYLINE DITCH 5. CAMERON PASS DITCH 10 6. MICHIGAN DITCH 11 DENVER 7. GRAND RIVER DITCH 5 17 16 15 8. ALVA B. ADAMS TUNNEL GLENWOOD 19 18 9. MOFFAT WATER TUNNEL SPRINGS 12 10. BERTHOUD PASS DITCH 20 11. VIDLER TUNNEL GRAND 12. HAROLD D. ROBERTS TUNNEL JUNCTION 13 14 13. BOREAS PASS DITCH 21 14. HOOSIER PASS TUNNEL DELTA 4 2 22 PUEBLO TO ARKANSAS BASIN MONTROSE 15. COLUMBINE DITCH 16. EWING DITCH 17. WURTZ DITCH 23 18. HOMESTAKE TUNNEL 24 19. CHARLES H. BOUSTEAD TUNNEL 20. BUSK-IVANHOE TUNNEL 21. TWIN LAKES TUNNEL 3 22. LARKSPUR DITCH 25 ALAMOSA 26 27 28 DURANGO 7 29 TO RIO GRANDE BASIN 23. TARBELL 24. WEMINUCHE PASS DITCH 25. PINE RIVER-WEMINUCHE PASS DITCH 26. WILLIAMS CREEK-SQUAW PASS DITCH 27. DON LA FONT DITCHES 1 & 2 28. TREASURE PASS DIVERSION DITCH 29. TABOR DITCH South Platte Water Usage 1980 Surface Water Use Breakdown 2005 Surface Water Use Breakdown Augmentation Recharge Industrial 7% 6% 6% Municipal Industrial 12% 4% Municipal 21% Irrigation 62% Irrigation 82% Ground Water Only Ground Water & Surface Water Surface Water Only 18% 27% 55% Source: Colorado Decision Support System - 2005 SWSI 2010 – South Platte Basin http://cwcb.state.co.us/water-management/water-supply-planning/pages/swsi2010.aspx • Population – Current (2010) – 5.05 million – Projected (2050) – 8.6 to 10 million • Irrigated Area – Current (2010) – 860,000 acres – Projected (2050) Decrease by – 180,000 to 267,000 acres • Municipal & Industrial Supply “Gap” – between 99,000 AF and 360,000 AF – 110,000 – 130,000 AF (With Identified Projects and Process ) Key Water Measurement Terms cfs – a cubic foot of water past a fixed point in one second (second-foot) Acre-foot – one acre covered one foot in depth (1 cfs for 1 day equals approximately 2 acre-feet) – Average surburban family uses about ½ acre-foot of water per year Flume or Weir – specially shaped devices installed in a ditch to measure flow In 1879, Colorado established Water Commissioners to distribute water rights in priority based upon principle of “First In Time... First In Right” Colorado’s Water Administration System The Prior Appropriation Doctrine means those that put the water to use first are entitled to get their water first during periods of water shortage. In Colorado, the priority of a water right is determined by BOTH the date when the water was first put to a beneficial use and the date when the right was decreed by the Water Court. This is opposed to the Riparian Doctrine that recognizes water rights as being attached to lands adjacent to the river or stream. Colorado Average Precipitation U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA National Climatic Data Center Definition of Terms for a Call • Free River – the supply of water in the river exceeds the demand for water by all decreed water users • Call – the demand for water by a user with a decreed water right • Valid Call - recognized and administered by Division of Water Resources – the determination by the Water Commissioner of the most junior right that may divert when the supply of water in the river is less than the demand on the river by all decreed water users (also known as “The Call”) Over-Appropriated South Platte • More water is usually claimed or desired by water users than is available. • Generally experience a water shortage much of the year. • Almost always throughout the summer only water users who have water rights dating from the 1860’s to the 1890’s can divert in-priority. • Plans of augmentation allow replacement of out-of- priority diversions. South Platte River Drainage Water Rights Development # 76 SEDGWICK Logan Sedgwick 3 Priority Dates 48 NUNN Of Controlling • LarimerA # D64 STERLING # HOLYOKE Water Rights FORT COLLINS # # Weld Phillips 4 GREELEY # Early 1860’s • # ESTEAS PA R K C A FORT MORGAN # 65 Late 1860’s YUMA To Early A 5 K E EN E S B U RG M o r g a n #B WRAY Boulder # # 1870’s # 2 Yuma A B OU L D E RB W a s h i n g to n C Early 1880’s 6 1 GilpiAn A d a m s D Late 1880’s BENNETT To Mid-1890’s 7 DENVER # Clear Creek D#enver A Arapahoe J9efferson A 8 CASTLE ROCK Lincoln Kit Carson # Elbert FLAGLER 80 Douglas # 49 Park A 23 El Paso WOODLAND PARK # Teller Cheyenne # Cities Division 1 Boundary N Division 1 Districts Division 1 Counties W E Main Rivers S Plan for Augmentation • Plan to provide replacement water so that diversions by a junior water right user can occur without injuring other water right users. • The junior water right diversion is often associated with a well or a group of wells and replacement is of the depletions of those wells. Change of Water Right • Change in type, place, or time of use • Change in point of diversion • Change from direct application to storage and subsequent application • Change in point of storage • Often, a change of an irrigation right to municipal or augmentation purposes. This may involve new or alternate points of diversion, but not always. Two Recent Trends for Northern Front Range • Expanding Dairy Industry – Leprino cheese factories in Greeley and Ft. Morgan – Private dairies need water supply • Use of Technology – Electronic data loggers – Remote reporting Water Commissioner Responsibilities • Day to Day Administration – Setting the Valid Call Based on Supply and Demand – Assuring Diversions In Priority For Decreed Uses Without Waste – Delivery of Augmentation and Other Water After Assessing Transit Losses – Operating Exchanges – Assuring Diversions Are Measured – Assuring Augmentation and Return Flow Requirements Are Made – Assuring Compliance with Other Decree Conditions in Augmentation and Change Cases • Review of Accounting and Maintenance of Diversion Records.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Summit ACP FINAL Report.Pdf
    CO 9 SOUTH SUMMIT ACCESS STUDY SUMMIT COUNTY LINE (MP 77.49) TO BOREAS PASS RD (MP 86.26) DEC 2020 South Summit Colorado State Highway 9 Access and Conceptual Trail Design Study SOUTH SUMMIT COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 9 ACCESS AND CONCEPTUAL TRAIL DESIGN STUDY CO-9: M.P. 77.49 (Carroll Lane) to M.P. 86.26 (Broken Lance Drive/Boreas Pass Road) CDOT Project Code 22621 December 2020 Prepared for: Summit County 208 Lincoln Avenue Breckenridge, CO 80424 Bentley Henderson, Assistant Manager Town of Blue River 0110 Whispering Pines Circle Blue River, CO 80424 Michelle Eddy, Town Manager Town of Breckenridge 150 Ski Hill Road Breckenridge, CO 80424 Rick Holman, Town Manager Colorado Department of Transportation Region 3 – Traffic and Safety 222 South 6th Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Brian Killian, Permit Unit Manager Prepared by: Stolfus & Associates, Inc. 5690 DTC Boulevard, Suite 330W Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Michelle Hansen, P.E., Project Manager SAI Reference No. 1000.005.10, 4000.031, 4000.035, 4000.036 Stolfus & Associates, Inc. South Summit Colorado State Highway 9 Access and Conceptual Trail Design Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Background ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study Coordination ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Front Range Colorado What's Important to YOU?
    CentralSan Luis Valley Front Colorado Range Colorado What’sWhat’s ImportantImportant to to YOU? YOU? PleasePlease select select your your county: county: Alamosa □Custer Chaffee □El Paso Conejoe □Fremont Costilla □Park Mineral□Teller Rio Grande Saguache TheThe Colorado Colorado Department Department of of Transportation Transportation wantswants to to know know what’swhat’s important important to to you. you. Please completePlease this complete survey beforethis survey December before 15, December 2013, fold, 15, and2013, mail fold, it backand mailto the it backaddress to the printed address at the printed at the bottom of bottomthe survey of theor yousurvey can ortake you the can survey take theat www.coloradotransportationmatters.com.survey at www.coloradotransportationmatters.com . Watch for resultsWatch on for that results website on that website. YourYour input input is is important important – it will— helpit will shape help the shape Statewide the Transportation Statewide Transportation Plan Plan. Fold oneFold one 3. What do you feel makes the Central Front Range 1. Why is transportation important to you? 1. Why is transportation important to you? 3. regionWhat do unique? you feel makes the San Luis Valley unique? ? PlacePlace an anX in X the in thebox boxbeside beside your topyour two top two: Place an X in the box beside your top three Select your top three: Moves Moves people peopleand goods and safely goods safely Urban amenities Urban amenities Supports Supports existing existing businesses businesses Rural living with nearby city amenities Helps economic development Innovation Rural and living creativity with nearby city amenities Helps economic development Gets me to work and/or vital services Agriculture Innovation and creativity Gets me to work and/or vital services Helps me live my life the way I want Freight/shipping Agriculture industry Helps me live my life the way I want Sense of community PLEASE Freight/shipping industry 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    Analysis and Technical Update to the Colorado Water Plan Technical Memorandum Prepared for: Colorado Water Conservation Board Project Title: Current and 2050 Planning Scenario Water Supply and Gap Results Date: September 18, 2019 Prepared by: Wilson Water Group Reviewed by: Jacobs, Brown & Caldwell Technical Update Water Supply and Gap Results Table of Contents Section 1 : Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10 Section 2 : Definitions and Terminology ........................................................................................................ 11 Section 3 : SWSI 2010 Water Supply Methodology....................................................................................... 12 Section 4 : Technical Update Water Supply Methodology ............................................................................ 15 4.1 Current/Baseline Water Supply Methodology .......................................................................... 15 4.1.1 CDSS Basin Water Supply Methodology ..................................................................................... 16 4.1.2 Non-CDSS Basin Water Supply Methodology ............................................................................. 19 4.2 Planning Scenario A-E Water Supply Methodology .................................................................. 21 4.2.1 Planning Scenario Water Supply Adjustments ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2 CCR 601-1A [Editor’S Notes Follow the Text of the Rules at the End of This CCR Document.]
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Commission STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS CATEGORY ASSIGNMENT SCHEDULE 2 CCR 601-1A [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _______________________________________________________________________________ Section One: Introduction 1.1 Authority Section 43-2-147, C.R.S., authorizes the Colorado Department of Transportation ("Department") to regulate vehicular access to or from the State Highway System and establish a functional classification system. The State Highway Access Code, 2 CCR 601-1, ("Access Code") implements the state statute and sets standards for the regulation of access on State Highways. The Access Code is adopted by the Transportation Commission of Colorado ("Commission"). 1.2 Purpose Section Three of the Access Code provides an access control classification system. There are eight separate categories. The State Highway Access Category Assignment Schedule ("the Schedule") assigns to each state highway segment a category pursuant to the requirements of Access Code subsection 2.2 and Section Three. This assignment adoption is by the Commission. The Commission is promulgating rules in response to requests received from local governments and CDOT related to the Schedule. 1.3 Category FR - Frontage Roads Section Two of the Schedule contains the category assignments for all sections of highways specifically assigned by the Commission. By this Schedule, all state highway frontage roads (includes service roads) are assigned category FR, except for those segments specifically listed in Section Two as requested by the local authority in accordance with Access Code subsection 3.13(1). 1.4 How To Read Section Two (A) The following explanations are given to clarify the column headings in Section Two.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Colorado Division of Water Resources
    Colorado Division of Water Resources Water Literate Leaders of Northern Colorado • October 02, 2019 • Corey DeAngelis, Division Engineer • Mark Simpson, Poudre Water Commissioner • Jean Lever, Thompson Water Commissioner • Water Resources • Water • Parks and Wildlife Conservation Board • Oil & Gas • Reclamation, Conservation Mining and Safety Commission • State Land Board • Avalanche Information Center • Forestry https://cdnr.us/ • The position of Water Commissioner was created by the Legislature in 1879 • The office of State Hydraulic Engineer was created by the Legislature in 1881 • State Engineer is Governor Appointed • State Engineer’s Office became part of DNR in 1969 www.water.state.co.us Division of Water Resources Roles and Responsibilities • Water Administration – Surface & Underground – Water Court Participation • Interstate Compacts and Decrees • Flow Measurement (Hydrographic Program) • Public Safety (Dams and Wells) • Water Well Permitting • Public Information Service/Record Keeping DWR Water Divisions & Offices Division 1 Water Districts Map South Platte Basin Hydrology • USGS estimates total basin native flows to average about 1,400,000 acre-feet annually • Transmountain water imports average about 400,000 acre-feet annually • Total annual surface water diversions average about 4,000,000 acre-feet annually TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 1 2 3 STEAMBOAT 4 6 SPRINGS 5 6 7 30 8 TO COLORADO RIVER BASIN 31 GREELEY SOUTH 30. SARVIS DITCH 32 TO SOUTH PLATTE BASIN 31. STILLWATER DITCH 1. WILSON SUPPLY DITCH 32. DOME DITCH 9 2. DEADMAN DITCH 3. LARAMIE POUDRE TUNNEL 1 4. SKYLINE DITCH 5. CAMERON PASS DITCH 10 6. MICHIGAN DITCH 11 DENVER 7. GRAND RIVER DITCH 5 17 16 15 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Planning Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado
    Wildfire Planning Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Prepared for: The Town of Breckenridge P.O. Box 168 Breckenridge, CO 80424 Prepared by: 130 Ski Hill Road, Suite 100 Breckenridge, CO 80424 October 2015 Wildfire Planning Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Prepared for: The Town of Breckenridge P.O. Box 168 Breckenridge, CO 80424 Prepared by: 130 Ski Hill Road, Suite 100 Breckenridge, CO 80424 October 2015 Cover photograph: Goose Pasture Tarn and Indiana Creek watershed top left, Hayman watershed lower right Wildfire Planning: Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Wildfire Planning: Indiana Creek Watershed Breckenridge, Colorado Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Report Organization ...................................................................................................................... 1 Watershed and Geomorphic Characteristics of Indiana Creek ............................................................. 3 2.1 Water-quality Impacts from Wildfire............................................................................................ 3 2.2 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Hydrologic Impacts ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Snowmelt and Rainfall Peak-Flow Data on Selected Foothills Region Streams, South Platte River, Arkansas River, and Colorado River Basins, Colorado
    ANNUAL SNOWMELT AND RAINFALL PEAK-FLOW DATA ON SELECTED FOOTHILLS REGION STREAMS, SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, ARKANSAS RIVER, AND COLORADO RIVER BASINS, COLORADO By John G. Elliott, Robert D. Jarrett, and John L. Ebl ing U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 82-426 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ALBUQUERQUE DISTRICT; U.S. ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT; U.S. ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT; U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, Salt Lake City, Utah; COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD; and the URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Denver, Colorado Lakewood Colorado 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information For sale by: write to: Open-File Services Section Colorado District Chief Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey, MS U.S. Geological Survey, MS 306 Box 25046, Denver Federal Center Box 25^25, Denver Federal Center Lakewood, CO 80225 Denver, CO 80225 (303) 234-5888 CONTENTS Page Glossary------------------------------ ------------ ------ _- ______ _ \y Abstract-------------------------------------------------------------- ----- -j Intreduction----- ---------------------------------------------------------- -j Approach----------------------------------------- ---------- -- ----- 2 Acknowledgments--------------------------------------------------------- 2 Station selection------------------------------------------------------- --- 2 Differentiation between snowmelt- and rainfal1-produced
    [Show full text]
  • TOWN of BRECKENRIDGE OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION Monday, February 11, 2008 BRECKENRIDGE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 150 Ski Hill Road
    TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION Monday, February 11, 2008 BRECKENRIDGE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 150 Ski Hill Road 5:30 Call to Order, Roll Call 5:35 Discussion/approval of Minutes – January 14th 5:40 Discussion/approval of Agenda 5:45 Public Comment (Non-Agenda Items) 5:50 Staff Summary • Peak 6 Expansion Scoping letter • Cucumber Gulch Preserve signage 6:00 Open Space and Trails • Nature Series update • Trails Plan revision • 2008 Work Plan 8:15 Commissioner Issues 8:20 Adjourn For further information, please contact the Open Space and Trails Program at 547.3110 (Heide) or 547.3155 (Scott). Memorandum To: Breckenridge Open Space Advisory Commission From: Heide Andersen, Open Space and Trails Planner III Mark Truckey, Asst. Director of Community Development Scott Reid, Open Space and Trails Planner II Re: February 11, 2008 meeting Staff Summary Peak 6 Expansion Scoping letter At Council’s direction, staff drafted a Peak 6 expansion scoping letter to identify questions and issues of concern that the Town would like to be addressed in the U.S. Forest Service Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed expansion. The draft letter and memo are attached for BOSAC’s review, although this topic will be discussed at the 2/12 Council meeting, rather than the BOSAC meeting. Cucumber Gulch Preserve signage Staff has hired Erin McGinnis of McGraphix to review and design the sign family for the Cucumber Gulch Preserve. We anticipate receiving design work and sample materials from Erin in the coming weeks and may need to schedule a second BOSAC meeting in February (on 2/24) to review Erin’s work.
    [Show full text]
  • National Avalanche Center 2001-2002 Season Roundup
    TH E A Publication of the American Avalanche Association RE V I E W VOLUME 21, NO. 1 • FALL 2002 • US $4.95 On the web at www.a v a l a n c h e . o rg / ~ a a a p National Avalanche Center 2001-2002 Season Roundup Compiled by Janet Kellam ompiler’s note: This article is a compilation of season summaries from the network of Regional Avalanche Centers that receive funding from the US Forest C Service. In the past, we have produced this article in the spring, leaving a gaps with no information from the late spring and summer seasons. TAR is now publishing this roundup in the fall issue, in hopes of providing a more complete summary of avalanche center information. There are two additional Avalanche Centers in the NAC network: UAC/Bear River Avalanche Center-Logan and the Tahoe National Forest Avalanche Center. Their season summaries were unavailable at press time. Forest Service National Avalanche Center Those of us in the FS National Avalanche Center like to think of ourselves as the little center with the big name. The NAC has two employees, Karl Birkeland in Bozeman, Montana and Doug Abromeit in Ketchum, Idaho. The NAC, among other things, provides program guidance and support to local FS avalanche centers, facilitates technology transfer to FS field units, coordinates the FS national avalanche awareness program and manages the FS military artillery program. The past year was a good one. The NAC started the season by hosting the annual fall meeting for US avalanche centers. We held the meeting in Snowbasin, Utah and devoted one day to the nuts and bolts business of running an avalanche center and a second day to cutting edge avalanche technology including several excellent scientific presentations.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails Plan | 2009 Town of Breckenridge | Trails Plan
    TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE | TRAILS PLAN | 2009 TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE | TRAILS PLAN TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE TRAILS PLAN Introduction 4 Plan Philosophy 4 Plan Prioritization 5 Plan Goals and Objectives 5 Role of the Plan 5 Plan Assumptions 6 Plan Implementation 6 Plan Organization 6 How This PlanW as Developed 6 Winter and Summer Elements 7 Disclaimer 7 Planning Areas 7 Area 1: Ski Hill Road/Peak 7/8 Base Area 7 Peaks Trailhead and Trails 7 Freeride Park 8 Shock Hill/Nordic Center 8 Cucumber Gulch Preserve 9 Claimjumper/Recreation Center Connection 9 Peak 7 Neighborhood Connection 10 New Nordic World/Peak 6 Expansion 10 Iowa Hill Trailhead 10 American Way Access 10 Area 2: Core/Upper Four Seasons Area 11 Riverwalk Connection 11 Klack Placer 11 The Cedars/Trails End Connection 11 F&D Placer to Burro Connection 12 Maggie Pond Access 12 Four O’Clock Ski Run 12 Timber Trail 12 Maggie Placer Trail 13 Area 3: Breckenridge South 13 Aspen Grove/Aspen Alley Trail 13 Wakefield Trailhead 13 Little Mountain 13 Blue River/Hoosier Pass Recpath 14 The Burro Trail Accesses 14 Bekkedal/Gold King (lots 1&2) to Burro Connection 14 Ski Area Equestrian Trails 14 Now Colorado/Silver Queen Connection 15 Riverwood Trail 15 PAGE 1 TRAILS PLAN | TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE | TRAILS PLAN Area 3: Breckenridge South (continued) Breckenridge Park Estates Trailhead 15 Fredonia Gulch Trailhead 16 Bemrose Ski Circus 16 Wheeler Trail Resurrection 16 Pennsylvania Gulch and Indiana Creek Road Winter Access 16 Spruce Creek Trail Spur 16 Lehman Gulch Trail 17 Monte Cristo
    [Show full text]
  • MP 245 – 246: Floral Park
    MP 245 – 246: Floral Park The mile between mileage post 250 and 251 may be one of the best example of how complicated the “widening project” for U. S. Highway 40 was in terms of environmental issues and requirements by both the State and Federal government. To meet these requirements: a stream was moved and a wildlife crossing was added along with a new “wetland”. This mile also includes the location of an old campground, a ski run, and where U. S. Highway 40 crosses over the wagon road. Route Mile Marker X Y Longitude Latitude 1U. S. Highway 40 245 432479.42 4404308.42 -105.788552 39.786048 246 432907.07 4404304.72 -105.783557 39.786048 The curve around Floral Park has sometimes been a challenge. Engelmann Peak is in the background of the photo below. Read more information on Engelmann Peak. The top photo is of the Steamboat Stage and the date is not known. The photo on the right is of the Denver- Salt Lake – Pacific Trailways bus in 1939. Photos are provided by and used with permission from the Denver Public Library 1 Taken from the Colorado Department of Transportation’s website: http://apps.coloradodot.info/dataaccess/Highways/index.cfm?fuseaction=HighwaysMain MP 245 – 246: Floral Park (PAW 2012) 1 Where is Floral Park? Floral Park – red arrow Hoop Creek Stone Bridge – blue arrow Summit of the Pass – green arrow Photo provided by and used with permission from Gregg Gargan: Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Photographer A 1948 Denver Parks map lists a campground at Floral Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Index of Biotic Integrity for Southern Rocky Mountain Fens, Wet Meadows, and Riparian Shrublands: Phase 1 Final Report
    Vegetation Index of Biotic Integrity for Southern Rocky Mountain Fens, Wet Meadows, and Riparian Shrublands: Phase 1 Final Report June 9, 2006 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building Fort Collins, CO 80523 Vegetation Index of Biotic Integrity for Southern Rocky Mountain Fens, Wet Meadows, and Riparian Shrublands: Phase 1 Final Report Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 718 Denver, Colorado 80203 Colorado Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife, Wetlands Program 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8. 999 18th Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 80202 Prepared by: Joe Rocchio June 9, 2006 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 254 General Services Building Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Cover photograph: Clockwise (1) Riparian Shrubland, Middle Fork Swan River, Summit County, CO; (2) High Creek Fen, South Park, CO; and (3) Wet Meadow, San Luis Valley, CO. All photos taken by Colorado Natural Heritage Program Staff. Copyright © 2006 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program All Rights Reserved EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The primary objective of the Clean Water Act is to "maintain and restore the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters," which includes wetlands. In order to make informed management decisions aimed at minimizing loss or protecting wetland acreage and function, credible data on the integrity of Colorado’s wetlands need to be collected (U.S. EPA 2002a). An index of biotic integrity is a cost-effective and direct way to evaluate the biotic integrityof a wetland by measuring attributes of the biological community known to respond to human disturbance.
    [Show full text]