DOCSLIB.ORG

COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE UPDATE to DECEMBER 6, 2019 (8:30 A.M.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE UPDATE to DECEMBER 6, 2019 (8:30 A.M.) COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE UPDATE TO DECEMBER 6, 2019 (8:30 a.m.) Referred for Action (1) November 29, 2019, regarding “Rodgers Creek Bylaw Changes Questions and Concerns” (Referred to the Director of Planning & Development Services for consideration and response) (2) December 1, 2019, regarding Leaf Blower Noise Complaint (Referred to the Director of Corporate Services for consideration and response) (3) December 4, 2019, regarding “4175 Burkehikk Place, W.V.” (Referred to the Director of Planning & Development Services for consideration and response) Referred for Action from Other Governments and Government Agencies No items. Received for Information (4) Committee and Board Meeting Minutes – Audit Committee meeting May 13, 2019 (5) 73 submissions, November 17 - December 3, 2019 and undated, regarding Proposed: Zoning Bylaw No. 4662, 2010, Amendment Bylaw No. 5044, 2019; Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4985, 2018, Amendment Bylaw No. 5045, 2019; and Phased Development Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 5041, 2019 (Areas 5 and 6 of Rodgers Creek) (Received at the December 3, 2019 public hearing) (6) 4 submissions, November 29 - December 1, 2019, regarding Wireless Technologies (7) 6 submissions, November 29 - December 3, 2019, regarding Proposed Zoning Bylaw No. 4662, 2010, Amendment Bylaw No. 4938, 2019 (5776 Marine Drive - Thunderbird Marina) (Received at the December 3, 2019 public hearing) (8) November 30, 2019, regarding “A job well done” (Sidewalk Maintenance) (9) Vancouver Beideng Society, December 3, 2019, regarding “An Invitation to Chinese New Year Celebration Performance on Jan 25 2020 from Vancouver Beideng Society” (10) December 4, 2019, regarding “Climate and the Money Trail - ” (11) North Van Arts, December 4, 2019, regarding “You’re Invited to North Van Arts’ Holiday Open House” (December 12, 2019) (12) HUB Cycling, December 5, 2019, regarding “December Bike Bulletin” (13) 4 submissions, December 5-6, 2019, regarding Proposed Development Variance Permit 18-037 (4358 Ross Crescent) (Referred to the December 16, 2019 council meeting) (14) December 5, 2019, regarding “Rodenticide use and owl poisonings” (15) December 5, 2019, regarding “CBC News : Uber received more than 3,000 reports of sexual assaults in U.S. in 2018” 3965902v2 Received for Information from Other Governments and Government Agencies No items. Responses to Correspondence (16) Senior Bylaw Enforcement Officer, November 29, 2019, response regarding “Bylaws are not stopping light from flooding into apartments of the elderly” (17) Manager of Current Planning & Urban Design, December 3, 2019, response regarding “Rodgers Creek Bylaw Changes Questions and Concerns” (18) Manager of Current Planning & Urban Design, December 3, 2019, response regarding “Rodgers Creek and Cypress Village” (19) Manager of Current Planning & Urban Design, December 3, 2019, response regarding “No to Rodgers Creek as proposed” (20) Director of Corporate Services, December 5, 2019, response regarding “2195 Gordon” 3965902v2 (1) - -Original Message- From: s. 22(1) Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 11:51 AM To: MayorandCouncil <[email protected]> Subject: Rodgers Creek Bylaw Changes Questions and Concerns Mayor and Council: vote, understand exactly the total impact and details of the Before you please ask yourself this question: “Do I proposed answer believe it would be irresponsible understand exactly the proposals, then I changes?”. If you can not yes I of you, dereliction of your fiduciary duty and an abdication of your duties if you vote yes. I believe there may also be a cause of action against the district of WV because, effectively, by council voting for this proposal, WV is directly or indirectly approving the release of .21 billion cubic feet of CO2 gas into the environment in direct violation of councils own climate emergency declaration which was passed by council and is binding on the district of WV. continue to be confused about exactly what is being promoted I have spent days trying to understand and I by Mayor hope there are no unintended consequences and Council (and/or Planning or British Pacific Properties). I because this is a very complex series of changes made in order to add 491 housing diversification / rental units to this area. It is like the Federal Government introducing sneaky legislation (like for Lavalin) in an omnibus bill designed and intended to confuse WV residents. questions that I would like have I have a series of to answered by staff before next weeks vote. Attached are copies of pages taken from the 26 Sep 2019 report from M. McGuire, Manager of Current Planning & Urban design “Council Report”, that contains a series of recommendations. The attached pages are numbered A to 6 and the numbers on the bottom right is the page number of the Council Report. Except for pages D and E, all other pages are from M. McGuire memo: The top part of page D is derived from page C and these page D summarizes the currently permitted construction as in square footage and number of units. And then compares this to the proposed square footage and number of units. This page D, summary is: My estimated increases are: 1. Carbon Footprint: increase from construction of .21 billion cubic feet of C02. 2. Increase in population: 718 3. Increase in number of vehicles: 445-529; no estimate of the impact on traffic in reports 4. There is NO estimate of the increase in service vehicles traffic nor from construction related traffic 5. No estimate of total new traffic generated directly and indirectly from these additional people at Rodgers Creek Currently Approved: 1,020,776 sq feet of construction Currently Approved: 493 housing units Proposed: 1,224,775 sq feet of construction Proposed: 974 housing units Increase: 203,999 sq feet of construction Increase: 491 housing units Increase: 20% in sq feet of construction Increase: 98% housing units Page E is a partial copy of a British Pacific Properties (BPP) marketing/promotional piece. QUESTION 1: Page F, is the zoning bylaw change. The maximum total floor area column for zoning purposes is 2,079,598 Sq feet of new buildings with maximum of 1,217 housing units. The “sales pitch to citizens” show a maximum 1.224,775 sq feet of permitted construction. Why is the proposed zoning allowing for up to 2,079,598 sq feet of new construction? Please explain this 70% difference. Similarly for the zoning approved housing units of 1.217 vs the proposed 974 housing units (25% increase in housing units)? QUESTION 2: Page E: BPP notes rezoned plan a total of 1,122,800 sq feet of construction and yet the Council Report shows 1,224,775 sq feet. Why the difference [I assume that the Council Report amounts are “correct” in the sense that is what Council is voting on? Is the difference the possible additional construction on WV owned land in the area? QUESTION 3: Page E: BPP total housing units is for 699 homes and 125 rental units for a total of 824 units. Council Report total is 974 housing units a difference of 150 housing units (possible WV future construction?) What, in fact, is council voting on now in the sense that WV is now legally committed to build a 150 rental units on its property in this area? QUESTION 4. On page B, bottom it states: “A proposed amendment to the Development Procedures Bylaw that would allow form and character development permits within Rodgers Creek to be delegated to the Director of Planning...”. I have searched the WV website for “form and character” am unable definition and I to find a of what this means. Does it mean the Director of Planning has the power to, for example, add 5 stories to buildings without approval of council? Council can legally delegate but not abrogate their responsibilities. Please explain. QUESTION 5. On page B, bottom it states: “A proposed amendment to the Noise Bylaw to allow expanded construction hours in Areas 5 and 6 of Rodgers Creek”. Please explain the scope and does this mean residents in the area and along the route will have to tolerate even more noise and inconvenience?? QUESTION 6. Has district staff or BPP done/provided a calculation of the carbon footprint on new construction (i.e. carbon footprint up to the date of occupancy permit) of the proposed 203,999 sq feet of new construction (including roads, sewer, water, trail, etc infrastructure)? If yes, please provide the calculations. If no, why not? QUESTION 7. Has a calculation been done of the total cumulative carbon footprint from date of occupancy and going forward, say 25 years from all of the people living there including from transportation carbon footprint, infrastructure upgrades, heating, lighting, increase in police, increase in road maintenance, sewer capacity upgrades, etc etc? If yes, what is it and if no, why not? QUESTION 8. What legal defence does the district of WV have to defend itself if council votes yes to this proposal and thereby (possibly) performs an illegal act to permit (directly or indirectly) the release of .21 billion cubic feet of CO2 into the atmosphere? Voting yes would be a direct violation of its own passed and declared climate emergency resolutions? At best it would make the passing of this complex set of changes to bylaws illegal and unenforceable? Please explain why voting yes to this complex set of proposals is not illegal and/or leave the district WV open to litigation for breaking its own made laws without changing them first? Thanks s. 22(1) t 2VLLANi DSTRlCT OF WEST VANCOUVER 750 17Th srREEr, WEST V,NGOUVER 60 V7V 3T3 COUNCIL REPORT Date: ptember26, 2019 From; Michelle_MoGuire, Manager of Current Planning & Urban Design Subject: Rodgers Creek Areas 5 & 6 lRezoning 19-020 and Development Permit19-061(ea6orfly) File: 1010-20-19-020 & 1010-20-19-061 RECOMMENDATION THAT opportunities for consultation on the proposed Official Community Ptan amendment, with persons, organizations, and authorities, as outlined in the report from the Manager of Current Planning and Urban Design dated September 19, 2019, be endorsed as sufficient consultalion for purposes of section 475 of the Local Government Act.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mapping Recreational Trails Withing the Lower Seymour Conservation
    Final Project Report Mapping Recreational Trails Within The Lower Seymour Conservation Reserve For: Heidi Walsh April 2001 From: Tony Botica Patrick Kaiser Mark McGough Table of Contents Summary…………………………………………..……………………………………………………..1 Introduction…………………………………………………………..…………………………………..2 Procedure………………………………………………………………………………..……………….4 Results………………………………………………..…………………………………………………..7 Problems………………………………………………………………….……………………………..11 Conclusion…...…………………………………………………………………………………………13 List of Appendices: Appendix 1: Access Road………………………………………………………………………………14 Appendix 2: Baselines 1,2,3……………………………………………………………………………17 Appendix 3: Blair Range………………………………………………………………………………..33 Appendix 4: Bottle Top…………………………………………………………………………………37 Appendix 5: CBC Trail…………………………………………………………………………………43 Appendix 6: Corkscrew Connector…………………………………………………………………..…90 Appendix 7: Corkscrew………………………………………………………………………………...93 Appendix 8: Cut-off Trail……………………………………………………………………………..102 Appendix 9: Dales Trail……………………………………………………………………………….106 Appendix 10: Dales/Blair Range Connector…………………………………………………………..120 Appendix 11: Fork Connector…………………………………………………………………………122 Appendix 12: Incline…………………………………………………………………………………..125 Appendix 13: Lizzie Lake Loop………………………………………………………………………130 Appendix 14: Mystery Creek………………………………………………………………………….134 Appendix 15: Mystery Falls…………………………………………………………………………...155 Appendix 16: Mystery Creek Fork……………………………………………………………………160 Appendix 17: Mushroom Lot………………………………………………………………………….164 Appendix 18: Mushroom Path………………………………………………………………………...167
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Guiding Geology Tour of Stanley Park
    Page 1 of 30 Self-guiding geology tour of Stanley Park Points of geological interest along the sea-wall between Ferguson Point & Prospect Point, Stanley Park, a distance of approximately 2km. (Terms in bold are defined in the glossary) David L. Cook P.Eng; FGAC. Introduction:- Geomorphologically Stanley Park is a type of hill called a cuesta (Figure 1), one of many in the Fraser Valley which would have formed islands when the sea level was higher e.g. 7000 years ago. The surfaces of the cuestas in the Fraser valley slope up to the north 10° to 15° but approximately 40 Mya (which is the convention for “million years ago” not to be confused with Ma which is the convention for “million years”) were part of a flat, eroded peneplain now raised on its north side because of uplift of the Coast Range due to plate tectonics (Eisbacher 1977) (Figure 2). Cuestas form because they have some feature which resists erosion such as a bastion of resistant rock (e.g. volcanic rock in the case of Stanley Park, Sentinel Hill, Little Mountain at Queen Elizabeth Park, Silverdale Hill and Grant Hill or a bed of conglomerate such as Burnaby Mountain). Figure 1: Stanley Park showing its cuesta form with Burnaby Mountain, also a cuesta, in the background. Page 2 of 30 Figure 2: About 40 million years ago the Coast Mountains began to rise from a flat plain (peneplain). The peneplain is now elevated, although somewhat eroded, to about 900 metres above sea level. The average annual rate of uplift over the 40 million years has therefore been approximately 0.02 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Klinaklini Heli-Rafting Planning Your Trip…
    KLINAKLINI HELI-RAFTING PLANNING YOUR TRIP…. Thank you for choosing a R.O.A.M. wilderness rafting and hiking trip. We are very excited that you will be joining us for an unforgettable river trip through some of British Columbia’s most spectacular wilderness. In June of 1997, we put together an expedition team of professional guides for the first descent of this incredible mountain waterway. In August of the same year, we operated the first commercial trip with Men’s Journal magazine covering the event. In 1998, complete with supermodels, we operated the first all-woman descent in conjunction with the Donna Karan Corporation of New York and Marie Claire Magazine. Today, this carefully planned state- of-the-art expedition allows participants to travel where it was once unimaginable. If any of your questions remain unanswered, please don’t hesitate to call. We strive to fully prepare you for what to expect on your trip so you can spend your vacation thinking more about smelling the essence of a forest of old growth cedars or a field of Alpine wildflowers than whether or not you brought the right pair of shoes. The Terrain We Cover Rafting the Klinaklini River offers the adventurous traveller a bounty of images and experiences. Your rafting trip begins at the edge of the great interior plateau of British Columbia’s Chilcotin country, at Klinaklini Lake. This lake is a jewel encircled by pristine wilderness and it’s the perfect habitat for moose, grizzly bears, wolves, cougars and eagles. Enveloped by the peaks and canyons of the Coastal Range, you will be able to see Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • SEDIFLUX Manual
    NGU Report 2007.053 Analysis of Source-to-Sink-Fluxes and Sediment Budgets in Changing High-Latitude and High-Altitude Cold Environments: SEDIFLUX Manual Analysis of Source-to-Sink-Fluxes and Sediment Budgets in Changing High-Latitude and High-Altitude Cold Environments: SEDIFLUX Manual Sedimentary Source-to-Sink-Fluxes in Cold Environments (SEDIFLUX) http://www.ngu.no/sediflux, http://www.esf.org/sediflux Sediment Budgets in Cold Environments (SEDIBUD) http://www.geomorph.org/wg/wgsb.html Analysis of Source-to-Sink-Fluxes and Sediment Budgets in Changing High-Latitude and High-Altitude Cold Environments SEDIFLUX Manual First Edition Editors: Achim A. Beylicha, b & Jeff Warburtonc aGeological Survey of Norway (NGU), Landscape & Climate group, Trondheim, Norway Email: [email protected] bDepartment of Geography, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Dragvoll, Trondheim, Norway cDepartment of Geography, Durham University, UK Email: [email protected] 1 Analysis of Source-to-Sink-Fluxes and Sediment Budgets in Changing High-Latitude and High-Altitude Cold Environments: SEDIFLUX Manual 2 Analysis of Source-to-Sink-Fluxes and Sediment Budgets in Changing High-Latitude and High-Altitude Cold Environments: SEDIFLUX Manual 3 Analysis of Source-to-Sink-Fluxes and Sediment Budgets in Changing High-Latitude and High-Altitude Cold Environments: SEDIFLUX Manual 4 Analysis of Source-to-Sink-Fluxes and Sediment Budgets in Changing High-Latitude and High-Altitude Cold Environments: SEDIFLUX Manual Content Contributors…………………………………………………………...……...…….9 Preface……………………………………………………………………….……..15 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………16 PART A – SEDIMENT BUDGET FRAMEWORKS AND THE QUANTIFICATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSFER IN COLD ENVIRONMENTS………………………………………………………...………..17 Chapter 1 – Introduction and background: Sediment fluxes and sediment budgets in changing cold environments – A summary of key issues…………………………………………………………………..…………...19 Fiona S.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry Huı Now What
    What Now Terry? Huı For 18 years the challenge for Terry Hui and Concord Pacific has revolved around its massive city-within-a-city Expo-land project. With the development almost complete, the next 18 years look a little different by Jim Sutherland portraits by Paul Joseph 58 BCBusiness September 2010 September 2010 BCBusiness 59 Matt Meehan, Concord’s senior vice-president of planning. Yes, at times like these you need a leader like Hui, someone who’s not afraid to lay it all out where the rubber – or the cheekbone – hits the road. Ask a dozen different people for their take on Terry Hui and The moment he steps into a meeting on the you’ll hear a dozen variations on words like “smart,” “creative,” 10th floor of Concord Pacific’s Pender Street headquarters, Terry “thoughtful” and “generous.” Hui professes embarrassment. The windows look north toward “He was always pushing the teams – including the city – to Burrard Inlet, the North Shore mountains and, coincidentally, be more creative,” says Larry Beasley, former co-director of plan- Jimmy Pattison’s suite of offices in a building across the street. ning for the City of Vancouver. Had he the urge, Hui could look over and wave at the other opera- “He’s been invaluable, so competent,” says David Eisenstadt, tor of a Vancouver-based, family-owned consortium with annual president and CEO of Keg Restaurants Ltd., who has recently revenues measured in 10 figures, but right now he has some worked with Hui in pursuing a new site for the Vancouver Art explaining to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography of British Columbia People and Landscapes in Transition 4Th Edition
    Geography of British Columbia People and Landscapes in Transition 4th Edition Brett McGillivray Contents Preface / ix Introduction / 3 PART 1: GEOGRAPHICAL FOUNDATIONS 1 British Columbia, a Region of Regions / 11 2 Physical Processes and Human Implications / 29 3 Geophysical Hazards and Their Risks / 51 4 Resource Development and Management / 71 PART 2: THE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 5 “Discovering” Indigenous Lands and Shaping a Colonial Landscape / 85 6 Boom and Bust from Confederation to the Early 1900s / 103 7 Resource Dependency and Racism in an Era of Global Chaos / 117 8 Changing Values during the Postwar Boom / 137 9 Resource Uncertainty in the Late Twentieth Century / 153 10 The Twenty-First-Century Liberal Landscape / 177 Conclusion / 201 Acknowledgments / 214 Glossary / 215 Further Readings / 224 Photo Credits / 228 Index / 229 Introduction he geography of British Columbia is in constant place on it the features you consider important. This flux. Between 2014 and 2017 alone, the following cognitive mapping exercise reveals individual land- T events occurred, transforming the landscape and scape experiences (which can be shared with others) and the way people engage with it: demonstrates the importance of location. Using maps to answer “where” questions is the easiest aspect of geo- • Heat waves shattered temperature records, and wild- graphical study. fires devasted parts of the province, causing thousands Answering the question “Why are things where they to flee their homes. are?” is more complicated. “Why” questions are far more • Fracking triggered large quakes in the oil and gas difficult than “where” questions and may ultimately verge patch. on the metaphysical.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Flight Vol Libre
    3/97 Jun-Jul free flight • vol libre cover photonotavailableforpdffile Airspace?? Liaison AIRSPACE While you are awaiting your turn to take your annual check flights, you will read Scott McMaster’s report on the meetings that took place around the establishment of the new Ottawa TCA. I believe that we did well. This is my opinion. But what stands out is the superb representation we are all benefitting from. I want to tip my hat to Airspace committee members Scott McMaster and Ian Grant for the leadership and dedication to this important and critical issue. These meetings are totally unsuited for non–profit organiza- tions such as ours. They are sometimes two or three days long, on weekdays of course, forcing people to use hard earned vacation days to participate. In fact, SAC was the only recreational aviation organization present at one of these meetings. Scott, Ian, Jim McCollum and I felt that this first TCA review, while delivering an interim agreement of interest to the Ottawa members, will pave the way for future studies, such as will occur for Calgary and Halifax. At this time, we are looking at adding members to the airspace committee so that this overwhelming workload can be further shared. RECRUITING We practise a wonderful sport, one that gets tremendous people together to share an intellectual and physical challenge with, not against, the forces of nature — harvesting the energy of wind and sun. Collectively we need to offer a product of quality, a challenging learning experience, in a safe environment. In order to achieve this, we need a critical mass at the club level and nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Snow Avalanche Threats and Mitigation Measures in Canada
    CURRENT AND FUTURE SNOW AVALANCHE THREATS AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN CANADA Prepared for: Public Safety Canada Prepared by: Cam Campbell, M.Sc.1 Laura Bakermans, M.Sc., P.Eng.2 Bruce Jamieson, Ph.D., P.Eng.3 Chris Stethem4 Date: 2 September 2007 1 Canadian Avalanche Centre, Box 2759, Revelstoke, B.C., Canada, V0E 2S0. Phone: (250) 837-2748. Fax: (250) 837-4624. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW. Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N4, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW. Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N4, Canada. Phone: (403) 220-7479. Fax: (403) 282-7026. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Chris Stethem and Associates Ltd., 120 McNeill, Canmore, AB, Canada, T1W 2R8. Phone: (403) 678-2477. Fax: (403) 678-346. E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the Public Safety Canada funded project to inventory current and predict future trends in avalanche threats and mitigation programs in Canada. The project also updated the Natural Resources Canada website and map of fatal avalanche incidents. Avalanches have been responsible for at least 702 fatalities in Canada since the earliest recorded incident in 1782. Sixty-one percent of these fatalities occurred in British Columbia, with 13% in Alberta, 11% in Quebec and 10% in Newfoundland and Labrador. The remainder occurred in Ontario, Nova Scotia and the Yukon, Northwest and Nunavut Territories. Fifty-three percent of the fatalities were people engaged in recreational activities, while 18% were people in or near buildings, 16% were travelling or working on transportation corridors and 8% were working in resource industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tjk<Varsity Outdoor Club Journal
    TJk< Varsity Outdoor Club Journal VOLUME XXII 1979 ISSN 0524-5613 7Ae Wiiveuitj of ThitUh Cotumka Vancouver, Canada PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE Paul Hooper March 1980 Having been used to the Canadian Shield wilderness of Ontario and to skiing on a 200 foot mountain of garbage by Toronto International Airport, I was somewhat stunned by B.C.. The first few weeks of my university life were spent with awe as I stumbled around campus observing the benign beauty of the local hills. No longer would I have to drive for three hours to see a good expanse of uninterrupted vegetation or dodge rusty refrigerators while skiing on the garbage hill. I motivated myself to explore these new lands and since then I've seen most parts of the province. The V.O.C. was a motivating force for me ever since the beginning. I was impressed with the organized meetings and started to enjoy the companionship. I soon realized university was more than a place for pushing pencils. The largest push came when I worked for a summer initiating the construction of the Howe Sound Crest Trail under V.O.C. sponsership. The trail crew had more fun than work and a close tie with the V.O.C. resulted. My first minor exploration involved only day hikes with the V.O.C. By the end of the first year, I was tramping around Sphinx Camp with a day pack complete with garbage bag, accessories and a duck hunter sleeping bag. My equipment has changed but the nickname of Colonel Trashbag hasn't.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Heritage Register 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS
    HERITAGE REGISTER 2013 heritage register 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 ‘THE AMBITIOUS CITY’ 5 CHRONOLOGY OF HISTORIC EVENTS 6 HERITAGE REGISTER BUILDINGS 10 HERITAGE REGISTER SITES & STRUCTURES 119 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE FEATURES 124 HERITAGE CHARACTER AND CONSERVATION AREAS 129 INDEX OF BUILDINGS 132 INDEX OF HERITAGE REGISTER SITES & STRUCTURES 134 INDEX OF LANDSCAPE FEATURES 134 INDEX OF CHARACTER AND CONSERVATION AREAS 134 1 heritage register 2013 INTRODUCTION • The North Shore Inventory, 1983 This initial survey was undertaken by the North Shore he City of North Vancouver has a proud legacy of Heritage Advisory Committee, and identifi ed key historic settlement, and was offi cially incorporated as a new sites across the three North Shore municipalities. Tmunicipality in 1907 after it broke away from the District of North Vancouver. As a result of its ongoing growth • The Ambitious City: The City of North Vancouver and development, the City retains many signifi cant examples of Heritage Inventory, 1988-89 historic places that tell the stories of the past and continue to be Involved a comprehensive street-by-street survey of the valued by the community. The City of North Vancouver Heritage entire City, and identifi cation and evaluation of a number Register 2010 is a catalogue of existing heritage resources located of signifi cant sites, undertaken by Foundation Group within City boundaries. This project has provided a comprehensive Designs. update of previous inventory information that identifi es a broad range of historic resources such as buildings, structures, sites and • The Versatile-Pacifi c Shipyards Heritage Report, 1991 notable landscape features. The Heritage Register represents an A comprehensive survey of the industrial buildings ongoing civic commitment to monitor and conserve the City’s of the old Burrard Drydock site, undertaken by F.G.
    [Show full text]
  • And Rescue) for the Ultimate Selfie: How the Use of Social Media and Smartphone Technology Have Affected Human Behaviour in Outdoor Recreation Scenarios
    Search (and Rescue) for the Ultimate Selfie: How the use of social media and smartphone technology have affected human behaviour in outdoor recreation scenarios by Amy Harris B.A. (Hons., English Literature), University of East Anglia, 2003 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication Faculty of Communication, Art & Technology © Amy Harris 2020 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2020 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Amy Harris Degree: Master of Arts Title: Search (and Rescue) for the Ultimate Selfie: How the use of social media and smartphone technology have affected human behaviour in outdoor recreation scenarios Examining Committee: Chair: Sun-ha Hong Assistant Professor Peter Anderson Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Shane Gunster Supervisor Associate Professor Pascal Haegeli Examiner Assistant Professor Resource & Environmental Management Date Defended/Approved: April 7, 2020 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract The practice of outdoor recreation was historically a form of therapy and escape from the rigors of modern industrial daily work-life, and it remains a favored pastime today, with 70% of Canadians and 91% of British Columbia residents participating in “outdoor recreation or wilderness activities”. In recent years, there is a belief that the surge in popularity of hiking is due to beautiful destinations becoming more visible on social media. Further, the proximity of urban centres like Vancouver to such destinations reassures users that the safety benefits of urban technologies including smartphones, will remain accessible and reliable throughout their outdoor exploration and that help is available in the event of an emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    "BEING A GIRL WITHOUT BEING A GIRL": Gender and Mountaineering on Mount Waddingtotty 1926-36 KAREN ROUTLEDGE LIVE IN A CITY SHAPED BY MOUNTAINS. I first realize this while standing on top of one. It is 8:00 AM on the summit of Mount Baker, a Cascade Ivolcano just south of the American border. The summer morning is already scorching; snow glitters and melts at my feet. I am looking at the region where I have spent most of my life, but it has become another planet: alien, stunningly beautiful, yet somehow familiar. The view is dizzying; there's so much light, so much heat, so much air. All around me, peaks are stacked upon peaks, layers of paling blue fading into the sun-bleached sky. The sight of all this land at once is overwhelming. I know this place but not like this. Ironically, while Mount Baker's snow-capped plateau is a prominent landmark to Vancouverites, the city is utterly insignificant from here. Vancouver lies buried somewhere to the northwest, a squat grey mass in a valley of haze and smog, a sprawling city limited by mountains in three directions. I look down at this map made real before me and finally understand the extent to which geography shapes the way we live. The mountains that surround Vancouver are far more than landmarks, sources of income, and tourist beacons. We have changed these mountains and been changed by them. From their slopes and summits, countless city people have glimpsed not only their home from a different perspective but also their own lives, values, and priorities.
    [Show full text]