DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations Medal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations Medal United Nations Medal A United Nations Medal is an international decoration awarded by the United Nations Medal United Nations (UN) to the various world countries members for participation in joint international military and police operations such as peacekeeping, humanitarian efforts, and disaster relief.[1] The medal is ranked in militaries and police forces as a service medal. The United Nations awarded its first medal during the Korean War (1950– 1953). Since 1955, many additional United Nations medals have been created and awarded for participation in various United United Nations Medal awarded for service with UNMEE Nations missions and actions around the Type Service medal world. Awarded Service with a designated United Nations peacekeeping for mission Contents Presented the United Nations by United Nations Medal Status Currently awarded United Nations Korea Medal Website http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/sites/medals/index.html United Nations Emergency Force Precedence Medal Next (lower) NATO Medal (in US precedence) United Nations Medal ribbons United Nations Special Service Medal Receipt and wear of UN Medals France, Australia, Canada and New Zealand Ukraine United Kingdom United States Argentina Switzerland See also References External links United Nations Medal The most common United Nations medal is the standard UN decoration known simply as the United Nations Medal. Most countries bestow this award for any action in which a member of the military participated in a joint UN activity. United Nations Medal ribbon bar In situations where a service member participated in multiple UN operations, service stars,[2] campaign clasps,[3] or award numbers are authorized as attachments to the United Nations Medal. These devices vary depending on the regulations of the various armed forces.[4] The UN has authorised the award of numerals to be attached to the medal ribbon. The qualification for these numerals is not to indicate the number of campaigns served in, but rather the number of qualifying periods of service. Which are counted as 180 days after the initial qualifying period of 90 days if the service is performed as 270 days consecutive. For two or more deployments, each deployment has to be at least 90 consecutive days each.[5] United Nations Korea Medal The first United Nations medal to be created was the United Nations Service Medal, also known as the United Nations Service Medal Korea, was awarded to any military service member, of an Armed Force allied with South Korea, who participated in the defense of South Korea from North Korea UN Korea Medal between the dates of 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1953. The military forces of the Netherlands are awarded the medal for service to January 1, 1955, while the armed forces of Thailand and Sweden grant the award to July 27, 1955.[6] United Nations Emergency Force Medal In 1956, to maintain the peace which brought the end of the Suez Crisis the United Nations Emergency Force was established. This was the first Peacekeeping operation of the United Nations.[7] To reward the service of troops from Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, India, UNEF Norway, Sweden and Yugoslavia those troops who completed ninety days of service with the UNEF were awarded the United Nations Emergency Force Medal. The mission lasted from November 1956 until June 1967.[8] It is unique from other United Nations Medals in that instead of saying UN on the obverse, it says UNEF. Subsequent missions did not use the missions abbreviation on its medals. United Nations Medal ribbons In most nations, the standard United Nations Medal is awarded in lieu of a campaign-specific medal. Most operations utilize a different ribbon for each mission, though there have been some notable exceptions. In some countries where the UN Security Council determines a mission in the same geographic region, but changes the mission mandate by way of Security Council Resolution, there may be a number of missions which have identical campaign ribbons and then later will change the ribbon to reflect the changing environment. The United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH) was originally established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 867 on 23 September 1993 and lasted until in June 1996. This mission was an effort to end the conflict and instability caused by the 1991 Haitian coup d'état. Subsequent missions to maintain stability and train the Haitian National Police were undertaken under UNSMIH, UNTMIH, MIPONUH, and MICAH. These subsequent missions all used the same medal as UNMIH.[9] In East Timor, the medals awarded for UNAMET, UNTAET and UNMISET all have the same ribbon.[10] Operation Operation Years Ribbon bar Operation Years Ribbon bar Operation area area Bosnia- 1948– UNTSO Middle East 1995–2002 UNMIBH Herzegovina India, 1949– UNMOGIP Pakistan 1996–1998 UNTAES Croatia Lebanon, 1958 UNOGIL Syria 1996–1997 UNSMIH Haiti 1960–1964 ONUC Congo 1996–2002 UNMOP Croatia West-Papua 1962–1963 UNSF and 1997 MINUGUA Guatemala Indonesia 1963–1964 UNYOM Yemen 1997–1999 MONUA Angola 1964– UNFICYP Cyprus 1997 UNTMIH Haiti India, 1965–1966 UNIPOM 1997–2000 MIPONUH Haiti Pakistan 1973–1979 UNEF II Egypt, Israel 1998 UNPSG Croatia Golan Central 1974– UNDOF Heights 1998–2000 MINURCA African Republic 1978– UNIFIL Lebanon 1998–1999 UNOMSIL Sierra Leone 1988–1991 UNIIMOG Iraq, Iran 1999– UNMIK Kosovo Afghanistan, 1988–1990 UNGOMAP Pakistan 1999 UNAMET East Timor 1988–1991 UNAVEM I Angola 1999–2005 UNAMSIL Sierra Leone 1989–1990 UNTAG Namibia 1999–2002 UNTAET East Timor Central 1989–1992 ONUCA America Democratic 1999–2010 MONUC Republic of 1991–2003 UNIKOM Kuwait, Iraq the Congo Western 2000–2001 MICAH Haiti 1991– MINURSO Sahara Eritrea, 2000–2008 UNMEE 1991–1995 UNAVEM II Angola Ethiopia 2002–2005 UNMISET East Timor 1991–1995 ONUSAL El Salvador 2003–2018 UNMIL Liberia 1991–1992 UNAMIC Cambodia Croatia and 2003–2004 MINUCI Ivory Coast Bosnia and Herzegovina 1992–1995 UNPROFOR 2004–2018 UNOCI Ivory Coast during the Yugoslav Wars 2004–2017 MINUSTAH Haiti 1992–1993 UNTAC Cambodia 2004–2006 ONUB Burundi 1992–1993 UNOSOM I Somalia 2005–2011 UNMIS Sudan 1992–1994 ONUMOZ Mozambique 2006–2012 UNMIT East Timor 1993–1995 UNOSOM II Somalia 2007–2020 UNAMID Sudan Rwanda, 1993–1994 UNOMUR Uganda Central African 2007–2010 MINURCAT 1993–2009 UNOMIG Georgia Republic, Chad 1993–1997 UNOMIL Liberia Democratic 2010– MONUSCO Republic of the Congo 1993–1996 UNAMIR Rwanda 2011– UNISFA Sudan 1993–1996 UNMIH Haiti 2011– UNMISS South Sudan 1994–2000 UNMOT Tajikistan during civil war 2012 UNSMIS Syria 1995–1997 UNAVEM III Angola 2013– MINUSMA Mali 1995–1999 UNPREDEP Macedonia Central 2014– MINUSCA African 1995–1996 UNCRO Croatia Republic 2017–2019 MINUJUSTH Haiti For service in the United 1974– UNHQ Nations Headquarters United Nations Special Service Medal For 90 days of service with a United Nations mission or organization where there is no specific approved United Nations medal, personnel may be eligible for the United Nations Special Service Medal (UNSSM). Some examples of qualifying service are the United Nations Assistance Mission in UNSSM ribbon Iraq, or the United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs Accelerated De-Mining Programme (MADP) in Mozambique. Receipt and wear of UN Medals France, Australia, Canada and New Zealand Some nations, such as France, the Commonwealth of Australia, Canada and New Zealand permit members of the military and police to receive and display multiple United Nations Medals as separate decorations. Ukraine Personnel of the Armed Forces are allowed to wear United Nations medals if they choose to. Such medals shall be worn after National and Presidential decorations, decorations of the Ministry of Defense, decorations of the General Staff, decorations of other military units, Ministries and departments and before decorations of the European Union and NATO in order of award.[11] United Kingdom Other countries, in particular the United Kingdom, permit a service member to receive the relevant United Nations medal and authorization for it to be worn is given by the FCO (Foreign and Commonwealth Office), Numerals may be added to denote multiple tours to one mission, the medals are worn in order of award and take precedence alongside British campaign medals. United States In the United States Armed Forces, prior to 13 October 1995, all US military personnel wore the blue and white United Nations Ribbon regardless of the ribbon awarded. On 13 October 1995, the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) approved a change to the wear policy of the United Nations Medal. Effective on that date, personnel who are awarded the United Nations Medal may wear the first medal and ribbon for which they qualify, adding a bronze service star for subsequent awards of the United Nations Medal for service in a different mission. No more than one UN medal or ribbon may be worn at a time.[12][13] On US uniforms, the UN Medal is worn before the NATO Medal, except for the United Nations Korea Medal, which is worn as a campaign medal just before the Vietnam Campaign Medal. US military personnel are eligible to wear the medal from one of the following United Nations operations as their one approved medal:[14] UN Truce Supervisory Organization in Palestine (UNTSO) UN Military Observers Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) UN Observation Group in Lebanon (UNOGIL) UN Security Forces, Hollandia (UNSFH) UN Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) UN Security Force in West New Guinea [West Irian] (UNSF) UN Iraq/Kuwait Observation Group (UNIKOM) UN Mission
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNICEF DRC Evaluation Report 2007-2011 Programme for The
    ICC-01/04-01/06-3344-Anx23-tENG 12-12-2017 1/88 EK T UNICEF DRC Evaluation Report 2007-2011 Programme for the Reintegration of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Armed Groups in the DRC Sylvie Bodineau May-June 2011 Official Court Translation ICC-01/04-01/06-3344-Anx23-tENG 12-12-2017 2/88 EK T Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1- What has been done................................................................................................................ 10 1.1 Different types of intervention depending on the geopolitical context, the CPAs present and the availability of funding.................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 UNICEF’s role............................................................................................................................ 14 1.3 Situation in June 2011.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multilateral Peace Operations and the Challenges of Organized Crime
    SIPRI Background Paper February 2018 MULTILATERAL PEACE PROJECT SUMMARY w The New Geopolitics of Peace OPERATIONS AND THE Operations III: Non‑traditional Security Challenges initiative CHALLENGES OF was launched with support from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, co‑sponsored ORGANIZED CRIME by Ethiopia, and in continued partnership with the Friedrich‑ jaÏr van der lijn Ebert‑Stiftung (FES). This phase of the initiative seeks to enhance understanding I. Introduction about peace operations and non‑traditional security Multilateral peace operations are increasingly confronting a set of challenges such as terrorism interrelated and mutually reinforcing security challenges that are relatively and violent extremism, new to them, that do not respect borders, and that have causes and effects irregular migration, piracy, which cut right across the international security, peacebuilding and organized crime and environmental degradation. It development agendas.1 Organized crime provides one of the most prominent aims to identify the various examples of these ‘non-traditional’ security challenges.2 perceptions, positions and There are many different definitions of organized crime depending on the interests of the relevant context, sector and organization. The United Nations Convention against stakeholders, as well as to Transnational Organized Crime defines an ‘organized criminal group’ as stimulate open dialogue, ‘a structured group of three or more persons, existing for a period of time cooperation and mutual and acting in concert with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes understanding by engaging key or offences . in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other stakeholders and mapping the material benefit’.3 However, this definition is not unchallenged.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Hansard Acronyms List Remember: Ctrl+F for Quick Searches
    Federal Hansard Acronyms List Remember: Ctrl+F for quick searches A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A 2.5G [the first packet overlays on 2G networks] 2G second generation [the first generation of digital cellular networks, as opposed to analog] 3G third generation [next generation of cellular networks] 3GPP 3G Partnership Project [global standards body to oversee 3G] 4D meat from dead, dying, diseased or disabled animals 4GL fourth-generation language [computers] A&C automation and control A&D admission and disposition; alcohol and drugs A&E accident and emergency A&RMC formerly Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre [now Austin Health] AA anti-aircraft; Alcoholics Anonymous; Athletics Australia AAA Agriculture Advancing Australia; Australian Automobile Association; Australian Archaeological Association; Australian Airports Association AAAA Aerial Agricultural Association of Australia AAAE Australian Association of Automotive Electricians AAAGP Australian Association of Academic General Practice AAALAC Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International AAB Australian Associated Brewers AAC Aboriginal advisory committee; Australian Arabic Council; AARNet Advisory Committee AACAP ATSIC-Army Community Assistance Program AACC Aboriginal Affairs Coordinating Committee [WA]; Australian Association of Career Counsellors AACM Australian Association for Computational Mechanics AACS Australian Associations of Christian Schools [note: Associations—plural] AACV Australian Association of Cattle Veterinarians AAD Australian Antarctic Division [Department of the Environment and Heritage] AADCP ASEAN-Australia Development Cooperation Program [taking over AAECP] AADS advanced air defence simulator AADT average annual daily traffic AaE Australian air Express Pty Ltd AAEC Antarctic Animal Ethics Committee AAECP ASEAN-Australia Economic Cooperation Program [finishes in 2005] AAFCANS Army and Air Force Canteen Service [now known as Frontline Defence Services] AAGP Australian Association of Group Psychotherapists Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • U.N. Peacekeeping Operations in Africa
    U.N. Peacekeeping Operations in Africa September 23, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45930 SUMMARY R45930 U.N. Peacekeeping Operations in Africa September 23, 2019 Many Members of Congress have demonstrated an interest in the mandates, effectiveness, and funding status of United Nations (U.N.) peacekeeping operations in Africa as an integral Luisa Blanchfield component of U.S. policy toward Africa and a key tool for fostering greater stability and security Specialist in International on the continent. As of September 2019, there are seven U.N. peacekeeping operations in Africa: Relations the U.N. Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Alexis Arieff Republic (MINUSCA), Specialist in African Affairs the U.N. Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), the U.N. Interim Security Force for Abyei (UNISFA), Lauren Ploch Blanchard Specialist in African Affairs the U.N. Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), the U.N. Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), the African Union-United Nations Mission in Darfur (UNAMID), and the U.N. Mission for the Organization of a Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO). The United States, as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, plays a key role in establishing, renewing, and funding U.N. peacekeeping operations, including those in Africa. For 2019, the U.N. General Assembly assessed the U.S. share of U.N. peacekeeping operation budgets at 27.89%; since the mid-1990s Congress has capped the U.S. payment at 25% due to concerns that the current assessment is too high. During the Trump Administration, the United States generally has voted in the Security Council for the renewal and funding of existing U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • S/RES/2387 (2017) Security Council
    United Nations S/RES/2387 (2017) Security Council Distr.: General 15 November 2017 Resolution 2387 (2017) Adopted by the Security Council at its 8102nd meeting, on 15 November 2017 The Security Council, Recalling its previous resolutions and statements on the Central African Republic (CAR), in particular resolutions 2121 (2013), 2127 (2013), 2134 (2014), 2149 (2014), 2181 (2014), 2196 (2015), 2212 (2015), 2217 (2015), 2262 (2016), 2264 (2016), 2281 (2016), 2301 (2016), 2339 (2017), as well as resolution 2272 (2016), and its Presidential Statements S/PRST/2014/28 of 18 December 2014, S/PRST/2015/17 of 20 October 2015, S/PRST/2016/17 of 16 November 2016, S/PRST/2017/5 of 4 April 2017 and S/PRST/2017/9 of 13 July 2017, Reaffirming its strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of the CAR, and recalling the importance of the principles of non-interference, good-neighbourliness and regional cooperation, Reaffirming the basic principles of peacekeeping, including consent of the parties, impartiality, and non-use of force, except in self-defence and defence of the mandate, recognizing that the mandate of each peacekeeping mission is specific to the need and situation of the country concerned, and recalling, in this regard, its Presidential Statement S/PRST/2015/22 of 25 November 2015, Recalling that the CAR Authorities have the primary responsibility to protect all populations in the CAR in particular from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and, in this regard, recalling
    [Show full text]
  • Of the United Nations Mission in the DRC / MONUC – MONUSCO
    Assessing the of the United Nations Mission in the DRC / MONUC – MONUSCO REPORT 3/2019 Publisher: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Copyright: © Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2019 ISBN: 978-82-7002-346-2 Any views expressed in this publication are those of the author. Tey should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Te text may not be re-published in part or in full without the permission of NUPI and the authors. Visiting address: C.J. Hambros plass 2d Address: P.O. Box 8159 Dep. NO-0033 Oslo, Norway Internet: effectivepeaceops.net | www.nupi.no E-mail: [email protected] Fax: [+ 47] 22 99 40 50 Tel: [+ 47] 22 99 40 00 Assessing the Efectiveness of the UN Missions in the DRC (MONUC-MONUSCO) Lead Author Dr Alexandra Novosseloff, International Peace Institute (IPI), New York and Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI), Oslo Co-authors Dr Adriana Erthal Abdenur, Igarapé Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Prof. Tomas Mandrup, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, and Royal Danish Defence College, Copenhagen Aaron Pangburn, Social Science Research Council (SSRC), New York Data Contributors Ryan Rappa and Paul von Chamier, Center on International Cooperation (CIC), New York University, New York EPON Series Editor Dr Cedric de Coning, NUPI External Reference Group Dr Tatiana Carayannis, SSRC, New York Lisa Sharland, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Canberra Dr Charles Hunt, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Australia Adam Day, Centre for Policy Research, UN University, New York Cover photo: UN Photo/Sylvain Liechti UN Photo/ Abel Kavanagh Contents Acknowledgements 5 Acronyms 7 Executive Summary 13 Te effectiveness of the UN Missions in the DRC across eight critical dimensions 14 Strategic and Operational Impact of the UN Missions in the DRC 18 Constraints and Challenges of the UN Missions in the DRC 18 Current Dilemmas 19 Introduction 21 Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha)
    OCTOBER 2005 UN OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA) TABLE OF CONTENTS NUMBERS................................................................................................................ 1 A............................................................................................................................. 2 B ........................................................................................................................... 13 C........................................................................................................................... 16 D........................................................................................................................... 28 E ........................................................................................................................... 32 F ........................................................................................................................... 36 G .......................................................................................................................... 40 H........................................................................................................................... 43 I ............................................................................................................................ 47 J............................................................................................................................ 54 K ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Index and Abbreviations DIPLOMATIC BLUEBOOK 2005
    Index and Abbreviations DIPLOMATIC BLUEBOOK 2005 Index <Notes> 1. This index is comprised of terms that can be found in the main text (including charts), columns, and topics. 2. The figures indicate the page numbers on which references to the terms appear. Italicized figures denote terms that appear in the charts, columns or topics. Numbers 13, 15, 18, 19, 34, 42, 43, 45, 46, 49, 50, 52, 54, 56, 57, 150th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic rela- 58, 59, 60, 63, 73, 137, 139, 139, 140, 157, 159, 162, tions between the two countries [Japan and Russia]: 167, 168, 169, 170, 177, 184, 187, 201, 218, 253 87, 91 ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF): 5, 18, 56, 138, 140, 142 1993 Tokyo Declaration: 88 B 386 generation: 32 3R: 9, 172, 174, 185, 187 barrier: 104 3rd Africa-Asia Business Forum: 118, 121 Bills Concerning Responses to Armed Attack Situations: 4th plenary session of the 16th Central Committee: 38 218 9/11 Commission: 66 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC): 153, 156, 157 biometrics: 239 A Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE): 63, 65, 70 abduction: 47, 98, 235, 237, 239 Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative: 114, 115, abduction and murder of a Japanese national: 235 116 abduction cases involving Japanese nationals [in Iraq]: 239 Byrd Amendment: 65, 166 abduction issue: 3, 11, 21, 24, 26, 69, 191, 192 C Abu Dhabi Meeting: 13, 100 Action Plan for Prevention of Terrorism: 140 Central Asia Plus Japan: 14, 87, 93 Additional Protocol: 8, 111, 133, 133, 153, 155, 218 Central Asian Cooperation Organization (CACO): 92, 93 Additional
    [Show full text]
  • Q:\Web\Publications\02-1998 to 2008\DCR\Rhodesia\Rhodes-1.Wpd
    UNIDIR/95/41 UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva Disarmament and Conflict Resolution Project Managing Arms in Peace Processes: Rhodesia/Zimbabwe Paper: Jeremy Ginifer Questionnaire Compilation: LT Col J.W. Potgieter, Military Expert, DCR Project Project funded by: the Ford Foundation, the United States Institute of Peace, the Winston Foundation, the Ploughshares Fund, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the governments of Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Finland, France, Austria, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Argentina, and the Republic of South Africa. UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 1995 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. UNIDIR/95/41 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. GV.E.95.0.28 ISBN 92-9045-109-2 Table of Contents Page Preface - Sverre Lodgaard ...................................... v Acknowledgements .......................................... vii Project Introduction - Virginia Gamba ............................ix Project Staff............................................... xvii List of Acronyms............................................xix Part I: Case Study ..................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................ 3 2. Political and Historical Context of Demilitarization in Zimbabwe-Rhodesia ...................... 5 2.1 The Civil War ....................................... 6 3. The Role of External Intervention in the Demilitarization Settlement .......................... 10 4. Negotiating the Demilitarization Mandate ..................
    [Show full text]
  • The United Nations and Its Agencies: Unequal Financial Allocations, Mistreatment of Israel, and Straying from Its Mandates
    The United Nations and its Agencies: Unequal Financial Allocations, Mistreatment of Israel, and Straying from its Mandates Ran Bar-Yoshafat Tevet 5779 – January 2019 Policy Paper no. 44 Attorney Ran Bar-Yoshafat Deputy Director of the Kohelet Policy Forum Ran is active in the fields of constitutional and international law, and public diplomacy. Ran received a Law degree from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, a Masters in Business from Tel-Aviv University, and a Masters in American Jewish History from Haifa University. The United Nations and its Agencies: Unequal Financial Allocations, Mistreatment of Israel, and Straying from its Mandates Ran Bar-Yoshafat Tevet 5779 – January 2019 Policy Paper no. 44 The United Nations and Its Agencies: Unequal Financial Allocations, Mistreatment of Israel, and Straying from its Mandates Attorney Ran Bar-Yoshafat Printed in Israel, January 2019 ISBN 978-965-7674-55-0 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 United Nations General Assembly (GA) .................................................................. 7 United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) ............................................ 11 Security Council Peacekeeping Operations and Political Missions .........13 Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process (UNSCO) ............17 Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I: All UN Peacekeeping Mandates, 1948-2016
    Appendix I: All UN Peacekeeping Mandates, 1948-2016 Appendix I lists all new mandates for UN peace operations issued per year categorized by Chapter of the UN Charter invoked in the mandate. There are three lists in this appendix: Chapter VI mandates, Chapter VII mandates, and mandates that shifted between Chapter VI and Chapter VII. Missions are listed chronologically and recorded in each category in which they received a mandate. A mission that shifts mandates will therefore appear on all three lists. 1 Appendix I: All UN Peacekeeping Mandates, 1948-2016 Table 1: Chapter VI Mandates (year indicates authorization of mission) Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) (1948) Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) (1949) Emergency Force I (UNEF I) (1956) Observation Group in Lebanon (UNOGIL) (1958) Security Force in West New Guinea (NSF) (1962) Yemen Observation Mission (UNYOM) (1963) Mission of the SG's Representative in the Dominican Republic (DOMREP) (1965) India-Pakistan Observation Mission (UNIPOM) (1965) Emergency Force II (UNEF II) (1973) Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) (1974) Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) (1978) Good Offices Mission in Afghanistan and Pakistan (UNGOMAP) (1988) Iran-Iraq Military Observer Group (UNIIMOG) (1988) Angola Verification Mission I (UNAVEM I) (1989) Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG) (1989) Observer Group in Central America (ONUCA) (1989) Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) (1991) Angola Verification Mission II (UNAVEM II) (1991) Angola Verification Mission III
    [Show full text]
  • Of the 90 YEARS of the RAAF
    90 YEARS OF THE RAAF - A SNAPSHOT HISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY 90 YEARS RAAF A SNAPSHOTof theHISTORY © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. Disclaimer The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defence, the Royal Australian Air Force or the Government of Australia, or of any other authority referred to in the text. The Commonwealth of Australia will not be legally responsible in contract, tort or otherwise, for any statements made in this document. Release This document is approved for public release. Portions of this document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry 90 years of the RAAF : a snapshot history / Royal Australian Air Force, Office of Air Force History ; edited by Chris Clark (RAAF Historian). 9781920800567 (pbk.) Australia. Royal Australian Air Force.--History. Air forces--Australia--History. Clark, Chris. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Office of Air Force History. Australia. Royal Australian Air Force. Air Power Development Centre. 358.400994 Design and layout by: Owen Gibbons DPSAUG031-11 Published and distributed by: Air Power Development Centre TCC-3, Department of Defence PO Box 7935 CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 AUSTRALIA Telephone: + 61 2 6266 1355 Facsimile: + 61 2 6266 1041 Email: [email protected] Website: www.airforce.gov.au/airpower Chief of Air Force Foreword Throughout 2011, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has been commemorating the 90th anniversary of its establishment on 31 March 1921.
    [Show full text]