DOCSLIB.ORG

Floristic Survey of Crawford and Cherokee Counties in Southeast Kansas: an Evaluation of Change Over Five Decades

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floristic Survey of Crawford and Cherokee Counties in Southeast Kansas: an Evaluation of Change Over Five Decades Pittsburg State University Pittsburg State University Digital Commons Electronic Thesis Collection Summer 7-1-2018 Floristic Survey Of Crawford And Cherokee Counties In Southeast Kansas: An Evaluation Of Change Over Five Decades Samantha Pryer Pittsburg State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Botany Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Pryer, Samantha, "Floristic Survey Of Crawford And Cherokee Counties In Southeast Kansas: An Evaluation Of Change Over Five Decades" (2018). Electronic Thesis Collection. 256. https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/etd/256 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Pittsburg State University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis Collection by an authorized administrator of Pittsburg State University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORISTIC SURVEY OF CRAWFORD AND CHEROKEE COUNTIES IN SOUTHEAST KANSAS: AN EVALUATION OF CHANGE OVER FIVE DECADES A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Samantha Lauren Young Pryer Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, Kansas May 2018 FLORISTIC SURVEY OF CRAWFORD AND CHEROKEE COUNTIES IN SOUTHEAST KANSAS: AN EVALUATION OF CHANGE OVER FIVE DECADES Samantha Lauren Young Pryer APPROVED: Thesis Advisor _______________________________________________ Dr. Neil Snow, Department of Biology Committee Member ____________________________________________ Dr. Hermann Nonnenmacher, Department of Biology Committee Member _____________________________________________ Dr. Kristopher Mijares, Department of Chemistry ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to thank all of the landowners who allowed me to do work on their properties and the people who helped me find properties and making contact with local landowners. In particular Janice Harryman, whose help was invaluable in this regard. Special thanks go to Cindy and John Epler, John Foster, Glenn Salsbury, and Bill Reid who helped immensely in showing me around and helping locate properties for research. Without these individuals, this project would never have been possible. Thanks to the Missouri Botanical Garden for use of their Missouri and Illinois Reference Collection as well as the space and tools to help confirm identifications. And also, Jim Solomon and Mary McNamara for making these visits possible. A special thanks also, to Dr. John Pruski who helped identify a difficult specimen and Ron Liesner for helping with family and generic identifications. I would like to extend a huge thank you to Craig Freeman and Caleb Morse for allowing me to report their state record specimens as well as for use of the McGregor Herbarium for help in identification confirmation. And also, a big thank you to Caleb Morse for compiling a list of specimens located in McGregor Herbarium for Crawford and Cherokee counties. This project would not have been possible without the assistance and list of taxa provided by John Kartesz. In addition, Biota of North America (BONAP) was an invaluable tool in this work. A special thank you to American Society of Plant Taxonomists for helping fund this projecect. I am grateful to the committee members, Dr. Hermann Nonnenmacher and Dr. Kris Mijares for their willingness to review this thesis. I am immensely grateful to my advisor, Dr. Neil Snow, for his support and continual guidance. He provided help and guidance throughout this project in so many ways, from helping collect, to identifying difficult specimens, confirming state records, and feedback. Not to mention, of course, the many hours of conversation throughout the years. His instruction, feedback, and example have improved this thesis and have made me a better scientist. Finally, I would like to extend a special thank you to my mother, Irene Young, for her unwavering love and support and for encouraging my passions, even at a young age. I would never have reached this point in my life without her. And also, of course, a big thank you to my husband, Lucas Pryer for his daily support and encouragement through this journey. iii FLORISTIC SURVEY OF CRAWFORD AND CHEROKEE COUNTIES IN SOUTHEAST KANSAS: AN EVALUATION OF CHANGE OVER FIVE DECADES An Abstract of the Thesis by Samantha Lauren Young Pryer This project had two main objectives. The first objective was to document comprehensively the vascular flora of Crawford and Cherokee counties in extreme southeast Kansas. Each county had seen limited collecting in recent decades, though a comprehensive survey had never been done for Cherokee County. PSU student E.S. Gibson summarized the flora for Crawford County in 1963. Fieldwork for the present study occurred mostly in 2014 and 2015. Based on 6500+ newly collected specimens, vouchers from Gibson’s study, and taxa documented by Biota of North America (BONAP) (Kartesz 2017), 1440 taxa are reported, which includes 33 state and 263 county records. The number of records was significantly more than expected. These results, coupled with other recent floristic studies nationally, indicate that current plant distributions in many parts of North America at the state and county levels are less thoroughly documented than many believe. The second objective was to make a five- decade comparison between the taxa Gibson (1963) reported for Crawford County and the values reported here. Its goal was to document changes in vascular plant diversity and report on native and non-native plant species that have moved into the area. The amount of taxonomic and nomenclatural change that has affected vascular plants in Crawford County was assessed. The total vouchered taxa for Crawford County increased by 32.6%, 24.4% of which were native and 8.1% non-native. In the nomenclatural comparison, a 22.6% change in binomial species names was documented. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE …...…………………………………...... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ……..……………………………………………...…… 13 Floristic Survey ……………………………………………………....… 13 Crawford County Comparison ....……...………………………..……… 15 Study Objectives …………………...…………………………………... 16 Study Area ……………………………………………………..……… 17 Climate …………………………………………………………………. 17 Geography ……………………………………………………………… 18 Ozark Plateau …………………………………………..………. 19 Cherokee Lowlands ……………………………………………. 19 Osage Cuestas ………………………………………………….. 20 Land Use ...…………………………………………………...………… 20 Soils …………………………………………………………..……...… 22 III. MATERIALS AND METHODS .………………………………..………… 23 Collecting and Processing ………………………….………………...… 23 Identification of Plant Specimens ……………………………………… 26 Analysis ………………………………………………………….…...… 29 Reporting ……...............................................……………………………31 Taxonomic Comparison with the Results of Gibson ………………...… 31 Nomenclatural Comparison with the Results of Gibson ……………….. 32 IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: FLORA. …………………….…………... 34 Taxonomic Summary ……………………………………………….….. 34 Non-Native and Invasive Taxa ……………………………………...…. 35 Rare and Species of Special Concern ………………………………..… 37 New Records for Kansas ………………………………………...……... 38 Range Expansions …………………………………………….………... 39 Extirpated taxa ……………………………………………………….… 43 Exclusions …………………………………………………………….... 43 Identification Notes …………………………………………………..… 44 Flora Conclusion …………………………………………………….…. 46 V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: GIBSON COMPARISON ……………… 49 v Comparison of Gibson’s List of taxa for Crawford County with the Current List……............………………………………………………... 49 Taxonomic Comparison and Discussion ..………...………...…………. 51 Nomenclatural Comparison and Discussion ………………………….... 54 VI. FUTURE WORK ........................................................................................... 58 REFERENCES .……………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 59 APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………….. 73 APPENDIX A – Flora Tables ……………………………………..…… 74 APPENDIX B – Gibson Tables………………………………………… 78 APPENDIX C – Mis-Identified taxa for Gibson …………..……………81 APPENDIX D – Annotated Checklist………………………………….. 83 APPENDIX E – Updated Modern List of Gibson’s Taxa with Current Nomenclature……………………...…………………………………... 153 vi LIST OF TABLES I. Summary Table ........................................................................................................................ 74 II. Extirpated Taxa ........................................................................................................................ 74 III. State Records ............................................................................................................................ 75 IV. Noxious Taxa ............................................................................................................................. 76 V. Crawford County Summary ................................................................................................ 78 VI. Missing Vouchers for Gibson .............................................................................................. 78 VII. Mis-Identified Gibson Vouchers ....................................................................................... 80 VIII. Modern List of Gibson Taxa ............................................................................................. 153 vii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE ……………………………………………………………………………. PAGE 1. KANSAS COUNTIES MAP …...……………………………………………... 17 2. PHYSIOGRAPHIC MAP OF KANSAS……………………………………….. 17 viii CHAPTER I. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE The collection,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Survey of Plant Distribution in Ohio.* John H
    A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF PLANT DISTRIBUTION IN OHIO.* JOHN H. SCHAFFNER. The following data are presented as a preliminary basis for field work in determining the natural plant areas of Ohio. It is hoped that the botanists of the State will begin active study of local conditions with a view to determine natural or transition boundaries as well as cataloging local associations. The distri- bution lists are based on herbarium material and more than 15 years of sporadic botanizing in the state. Of course, distribution at present indicates to a considerable extent merely the distri- bution of enthusiastic botanists and their favorite collecting grounds. Nevertheless, enough has been done to indicate in a rough way the general character of our plant geography. The kind of data most important in indicating characteristic areas are as follows:— 1. Meteorological data. 2. Geology, including the nature of the surface rock and soil. 3. Physiography and topography. 4. The actual distribution of characteristic species of plants and to some extent of animals. In Ohio, the following important maps may be studied in this connection:— Meteorology. By Otto E. Jennings in Ohio Naturalist 3: 339-345, 403-409, 1903. Maps I-XII. By J. Warren Smith in Bull. Ohio Agr. Exp. Station No. 235, 1912. Figs. 3-14. Geology. By J. A. Bownocker, A Geological Map of Ohio. 1909. Topography. The maps of the topographic survey, not yet completed. Various geological reports. The eastern half of Ohio is a part of the Alleghany Plateau. The western half belongs to the great interior plain. In Ohio, the Alleghany Plateau consists of a northern glaciated region and a southern non-glaciated region.
    [Show full text]
  • 1501:18-1-03 Endangered and Threatened Species
    ACTION: Revised DATE: 10/22/2014 11:54 AM 1501:18-1-03 Endangered and threatened species. (A) The following species of plants are designated as endangered in Ohio. (1) Acer pensylvanicum L., Striped maple. (2) Aconitum noveboracense A. Gray, Northern monkshood. (3) Aconitum uncinatum L., Southern monkshood. (4) Agalinis auriculata (Michx.) Blake, Ear-leaved-foxglove. (5) Agalinis purpurea (L.) Pennell var. parviflora (Benth.) Boivin, Small purple-foxglove. (6) Agalinis skinneriana (Wood) Britt., Skinner's-foxglove. (7) Ageratina aromatica (L.) Spach, Small white snakeroot. (8) Agrostis elliottiana Schultes, Elliott's bent grass. (9) Amelanchier humilis Wiegand, Low serviceberry. (10) Amelanchier interior E.L. Nielsen, Inland serviceberry. (9)(11) Andropogon glomeratus (Walter) Britton, Bushy broom-sedge. (10)(12) Androsace occidentalis Pursh, Western rock-jasmine. (11)(13) Anomobryum filiforme (Dicks.) Solms, Common silver moss. (12)(14) Anomodon viticulosus (Hedw.) Hook. & Taylor, Long tail moss. (13)(15) Arabidopsis lyrata (Linnaeus) O’Kane & Al-Shehbaz, Lyre-leaved rock cress. (14)(16) Arabis patens Sullivant, Spreading rock cress. (15)(17) Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng., Bearberry. (16)(18) Aralia hispida Vent., Bristly sarsaparilla. [ stylesheet: rule.xsl 2.14, authoring tool: i4i 2.0 ras3 May 23, 2014 10:53, (dv: 0, p: 120697, pa: 243620, ra: 421552, d: print date: 10/22/2014 08:00 PM 1501:18-1-03 2 (17)(19) Arethusa bulbosa L., Dragon's-mouth. (20) Aristida basiramea Engelm. ex Vasey, Forked Three-awn grass. (18)(21) Aristida necopina Shinners, False arrow-feather. (19)(22) Aronia arbutifolia (L.) Pers., Red chokeberry. (20)(23) Asplenium bradleyi D. C. Eaton, Bradley's spleenwort.
    [Show full text]
  • JJB 88 3 .Indd
    J. Jpn. Bot. 88: 166–175 (2013) New Combinations in North American Desmodium (Leguminosae: Tribe Desmodieae) Hiroyoshi OHASHI Herbarium, Botanical Garden, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-0862 JAPAN E-mail: [email protected] (Accepted on May 11, 2013) Three species groups in Desmodium of North America: D. ciliare group, D. paniculatum group and D. procumbens group are revised for Flora of North America. Each of them is treated as a single species containing one or two varieties. The following four new combinations are published: D. marilandicum var. ciliare (Willd.) H. Ohashi, D. marilandicum var. lancifolium (Fernald & B. G. Schub.) H. Ohashi, D. paniculatum var. fernaldii (B. G. Schub.) H. Ohashi, and D. procumbens var. neomexicanum (A. Gray) H. Ohashi. Desmodium obtusum (Willd.) DC. is regarded to be a synonym of D. marilandicum var. lancifolium; D. glabellum (Michx.) DC. and D. perplexum B.G. Schub. to be synonyms of D. paniculatum; and D. procumbens var. exiguum (A. Gray) B. G. Schub. to be a synonym of D. procumbens var. procumbens. Key words: Desmodium, Fabaceae, Leguminosae, new combinations, North America. Recently, Desmodium of North America can at least identify it with the group.” Under has been the subject of much study, notably by this framework, Isely recognized D. ciliare Schubert (1940, 1950a, 1950b, 1970) and Isely (Willd.) DC., D. paniculatum (L.) DC. and D. (1983, 1990, 1998). “Desmodium traditionally procumbens (Mill.) Hitchc., along with each is considered a ‘difficult’ genus” (Isely 1990, p. of their related taxa, as species groups. The 163). Isely (1990) further stated that Desmodium difficulty in classifying these groups is, however, contains “groups of species whose taxonomy not satisfactorily solved by this approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants at the UHCC
    Flora Checklist Texas Institute for Coastal Prairie Research and Education University of Houston Donald Verser created this list by combining lists from studies by Grace and Siemann with the UHCC herbarium list Herbarium Collections Family Scientific Name Synonym Common Name Native Growth Accesion Dates Locality Comments Status Habit Numbers Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis fringeleaf wild petunia N forb 269 10/9/1973 Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora violet wild petunia N forb Agavaceae Manfreda virginica false aloe N forb Agavaceae Polianthes sp. polianthes ? forb 130 8/3/1971 2004 roadside Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron radicans eastern poison ivy N woody/vine Apiaceae Centella erecta Centella asiatica erect centella N forb 36 4/11/2000 Area 2 Apiaceae Daucus carota Queen Anne's lace I forb 139-142 1971 / 72 No collections by Dr. Brown. Perhaps Apiaceae Eryngium leavenworthii Leavenworth's eryngo N forb 144 7/20/1971 wooded area in pipeline ROW E. hookeri instead? Apiaceae Eryngium yuccifolium button eryngo N forb 77,143,145 71, 72, 2000 Apiaceae Polytaenia texana Polytaenia nuttallii Texas prairie parsley N forb 32 6/6/2002 Apocynaceae Amsonia illustris Ozark bluestar N Forb 76 3/24/2000 Area 4 Apocynaceae Amsonia tabernaemontana eastern bluestar N Forb Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria yaupon N woody Asclepiadaceae Asclepias lanceolata fewflower milkweed N Forb Not on Dr. Brown's list. Would be great record. Asclepiadaceae Asclepias longifolia longleaf milkweed N Forb 84 6/7/2000 Area 6 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed N Forb 35 6/7/2002 Area 7 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias viridis green antelopehorn N Forb 63, 92 1974 & 2000 Asteraceae Acmella oppositifolia var.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Prairie Dawn-Flower (Hymenoxys Texana) 5-Year Review
    Texas prairie dawn-flower (Hymenoxys texana) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo credit: USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Texas Coastal Ecological Services Field Office Houston, Texas Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 4 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................... 7 2.4 SYNTHESIS .................................................................................................................. 24 3.0 RESULTS....................................................................................................................... 25 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTIONS.................................................... 26 5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 28 Appendix A ................................................................................................................................... 31 Recommendation resulting from the 5-Year Review: .................................................................. 34 Figures Figure 1 Current H. texana county occurrences ............................................................................. 9 Tables Table 1 Renaming of species historically associated with H. texana ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 New Crops & Bioproduct Development
    2006 Program Return to Meetings page 2008 New Crops & Bioproduct Development September 7 – 11, 2008 College Station, Texas Program Keynote Speaker Plenary Session General Crops Oilseeds Medicinal and Nutraceuticals Fibers and Cellulosics Natural Rubber and Resins Poster Session (General Crops) Poster Session (Medicinal and Nutraceuticals) Poster Session (Oilseeds) Poster Session (Natural Rubber and Resins) Poster Session (Fibers and Cellulosics) Top of Page ABSTRACTS Keynote Speaker BIOFUELS IN BRAZIL: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE NEEDS L.L. Nass Embrapa Labex-USA, USDA-ARS-NCGRP, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA The demand for food, fuel, and energy resources continues to increase worldwide. Currently, there are many international efforts aimed at finding renewable, sustainable, and environment friendly solutions for these problems. The spiraling price of petroleum and the adverse effects of using nonrenewable resources are major reasons for increased interest in renewable sources of energy. Brazil is the largest and most populous country in Latin America and ranks fifth in land area and population in the world. Brazil’s location in the tropical and subtropical zones of the world ensures intense solar radiation and year-round water supply for bioenergy production. In addition, the vast untapped land mass allows new land to be used for bioenergy production without reducing the farm area devoted to food production. file:////jomax.paholdings.com/data/azc3home/brandon3662/Desktop/Project%20files/AAIC/08progrm.htm[3/13/2019 1:55:52 PM] 2006 Program Ethanol production in Brazil based on sugarcane has a long, interesting, and turbulent history. Certainly, it is a global model for ethanol production, distribution, and use.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Plant List by Scientific Name
    1404 Citico Rd. Vonore, TN 37885 423.295.2288 office 423.295.2252 fax www.overhillgardens.com 423-295-5003 Avi 423-836-8242 Eileen [email protected] Retail Plant List by Scientific Name Latin Name Common Name Size Price Acer leucoderme Chalk Maple 10 gal $95.00 Acer negundo Boxelder Maple qt+ $16.00 Acer pensylvanicum Striped Maple 2 gal $30.00 Achillea millefolium White Yarrow qt $10.00 Achillea millefolium 'Paprika' Paprika Yarrow qt+ $12.00 Acmella oppositifolia Oppositeleaf Spotflower gal $12.00 Acorus americanus American Sweet Flag qt+ $11.00 Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair Fern gal+ $18.00 Aesculus flava Yellow Buckeye 2 gal $25.00 Aesculus parviflora Bottlebrush Buckeye 3 gal $28.00 Aesculus pavia Red Buckeye gal $18.00 Agarista populifolia (syn. Leucothoe populifolia) Florida Leucothoe 2 gal $25.00 Agastache rupestris Threadleaf Giant Hyssop qt+ $15.00 Aletris farinosa Colic Root qt+ $16.00 Alisma subcordatum American Water Plantain gal+ $16.00 Allium cernuum Nodding Onion qt $10.00 Allium tricoccum Ramps qt $14.00 Alnus incana Speckled Alder 3 gal $28.00 Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 3 gal $25.00 Amelanchier arborea Downy Serviceberry 25/band $15.00 Amelanchier laevis Allegheny Serviceberry 2 gal $25.00 Amelanchier sanguinea Roundleaf Serviceberry 2 gal $30.00 Amelanchier x grandiflora Serviceberry gal $18.00 Amorpha canescens Downy False Indigo gal $16.00 Amorpha fruticosa False Indigo 3 gal $25.00 Amorpha herbacea Hairy False Indigo gal+ $20.00 Amorpha nana Dwarf False Indigo gal $16.00 Amorpha ouachitensis Ouachita False Indigo gal+ $20.00 Ampelaster carolinianus (syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouriensis Volume 28 / 29
    Missouriensis Volume 28/29 (2008) In this issue: Improved Status of Auriculate False Foxglove (Agalinis auriculata) in Missouri in 2007 Tim E. Smith, Tom Nagel, and Bruce Schuette ......................... 1 Current Status of Yellow False Mallow (Malvastrum hispidum) in Missouri Tim E. Smith.................................................................................... 5 Heliotropium europaeum (Heliotropiaceae) New to Missouri Jay A. Raveill and George Yatskievych ..................................... 10 Melica mutica (Poaceae) New for the Flora of Missouri Alan E. Brant ................................................................................. 18 Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) New to Missouri Timothy E. Vogt and Paul M. McKenzie ................................. 22 Flora of Galloway Creek Nature Park, Howell County, Missouri Bill Summers .................................................................................. 27 Journal of the Missouri Native Plant Society Missouriensis, Volume 28/29 2008 1 IMPROVED STATUS OF AURICULATE FALSE FOXGLOVE (AGALINIS AURICULATA) IN MISSOURI IN 2007 Tim E. Smith Missouri Department of Conservation P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0180 Tom Nagel Missouri Department of Conservation 701 James McCarthy Drive St. Joseph, MO 64507-2194 Bruce Schuette Missouri Department of Natural Resources Cuivre River State Park 678 State Rt. 147 Troy, MO 63379 Populations of annual plant species are known to have periodic “boom” and “bust” years as well as years when plant numbers more closely approach long-term averages. In tracking populations of plant species of conservation concern (Missouri Natural Heritage Program, 2007), there are sometimes also boom years in the number of reports of new populations. Because of reports of five new populations and a surge in numbers of plants at some previously-known sites, 2007 provided encouraging news for the conservation of the auriculate false foxglove [Agalinis auriculata (Michx.) Blake] in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]