DOCSLIB.ORG

The Business and Technology of the Sheffield Armaments Industry 1900

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Business and Technology of the Sheffield Armaments Industry 1900 The business and technology of the Sheffield Armaments industry 1900-1930 CORKER, Chris Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/15579/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version CORKER, Chris (2016). The business and technology of the Sheffield Armaments industry 1900-1930. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University. Repository use policy Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in SHURA to facilitate their private study or for non- commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk The Business and Technology of the Sheffield Armaments Industry 1900-1930 Christopher John Corker A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2016 Abstract This exploration of the Sheffield armaments industry focuses on four in-depth case studies of John Brown, Cammell-Laird, Thomas Firth and Hadfields to examine the business and technology of the industry. It builds on the work of Tweedale and Trebilcock on Sheffield and armaments, and advances the argument that during the period of study from 1900 to 1930, the city was one of the most important centres for armaments research and production anywhere in the world. The business of the armaments industry is explored through an examination of the evolving links the industry had with the Government against the backdrop of an uncertain trading environment, and the managerial connections established between the state and private industry. Also explored are the collaborative, collusive and independent defensive measures enacted by the industry to counter uncertainty in the industry, through collaborative business arrangements and various approaches to entering international markets for armaments. An examination of the business of the armaments industry also highlights the value of the technological investment made by the industry. At the centre of exploring the technology of the armaments industry, a reconstruction of its technological history is undertaken using patent and archival records, highlighting the nuances and research dead-ends of development in the industry. Of central importance is the notion of spin-off and the interactions between armaments and metallurgical developments in the creation of a pool of knowledge to be utilised for future research into alloy steels, and the notion of path-dependent technological research. Also advanced is the concept of an innovation system centred on Sheffield, and an exploration of the important national and international links advanced by the industry. i Acknowledgements With any large project there are many people who have assisted along the way, and I apologise for any omissions. In history at Sheffield Hallam I would like to thank my supervisors Merv Lewis and Roger Lloyd-Jones for their assistance during the production of the thesis. Also at Sheffield Hallam a number of friends and colleagues from across the university have offered their support during my studies, including Mike Bramhall, Alison McHale, Anne Nortcliffe, Chris Short, Chris Hopkins, Christine O‟Leary, Manny Madriaga, and the late Dave Cotton. I would also like to thank my colleagues at the York Management School for their continued support, especially Simon Mollan, Kevin Tennent, Phil Garnett, Shane Hamilton, Matthew Hollow, Alex Gillett, Bill Cooke, Simon Sweeney, Beatrice D‟Ippolito, and Bob Doherty. Elsewhere, I would like to thank Sarah Holland at Nottingham University for her continued advice, support and friendship, James Fenwick at DeMontfort University who has offered an independent view of the research since its commencement, Joe Lane at the London School of Economics for intellectually stimulating discussions on knowledge and industrial districts, and Dan Spence at the University of the Free State, South Africa, for support and advice in the early days of the research. Thanks also go to participants at conferences in York, Sheffield, Lancaster and Montreal for their feedback on various elements of the research; to Jo Osborne for assisting in the design of the diagrams in the work, and for taking the time to interpret my hand-drawn versions; and to the staff at Sheffield Archives, Sheffield Local Studies Library, Kelham Island Archive, and Wirral Archives Service, without whom this research would not have been possible. Finally I would like to thank my family for their continued encouragement since the commencement of my studies, my parents John and Yvonne, brother Philip and his partner Charlotte, and especially to my fiancée Hollie, who has stuck by me through the highs and lows of the entire project and offered unconditional support and love at all times, despite hearing more about armour piercing projectiles than anyone ever should. ii Candidates Statement The objectives of this research were as follows. Using four case studies, the research set out to examine the technological development of armaments, the industrial district in which the Sheffield armaments industry was situated, the marketing involved and the connections developed to home and foreign governments by members of the industry, and the specialised management required for armaments research, production, and marketing, across the period 1900-1930. To achieve this, the archival business records and patents of the case studies were consulted. Published sources have been referenced throughout with footnote citations and are included in the bibliography in full. iii Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Armaments Technology 1900-1914 – The Evolution of the 28 Armour Piercing Projectile Chapter 2: Armaments Technology 1900-1914 – Armour, Metallurgy 66 and Innovation Systems Chapter 3: Business, Marketing and Special Relationships – Armourers 94 and the British Government 1900-1914 Chapter 4: Defence against Uncertainty – Director Networks, 139 Collaboration and International Business 1900-1914 Chapter 5: Technological Development in War and Peace 1914-1930 169 Chapter 6: The Business and Management of Armaments 1914-1930 201 Conclusion 242 Appendix A: List of Patents used in the Study 248 Appendix B: Hadfields‟ and Firth‟s British Government Projectile 255 Orders 1900-1914 Appendix C: Hadfields‟ and Firth‟s British Government Projectile 265 Orders 1920-1930 Appendix D: Brown‟s Monthly Armour Orders 1904-1924 271 Bibliography 272 iv List of Tables Table 3.1: Allocation of Naval and War Office Orders to Ordnance 96 Factories and the Trade 1899-1914 Table 3.2: Allocation of Armament Orders to Ordnance Factories and 97 the Trade 1905-1913 Table 3.3: Allocation of Projectile Orders to Ordnance Factories and 98 the Trade 1905-1913 Table 3.4: Hadfields‟ Directors 1900-1914, and directors who continued 100 1914 Table 3.5: Brown‟s Directors 1900-1914, and directors who continued 104 1914 Table 3.6: Firth‟s Directors 1900-1914, and directors who continued 104 1914 Table 3.7: Cammell‟s Directors 1900-1914, and directors who 106 continued 1914 Table 3.8: Cammell‟s Sheffield Works (Cyclops, Grimesthorpe, 114 Penistone) Invoiced Output, Profit and Dividends 1900-1913 Table 3.9: Cammell‟s Profits on Armour Sales at Cyclops Works West 116 Forge 1900-1913 Table 3.10: Cammell‟s Output Of Armour Over 2” thick, West Forge 116 Cyclops Works 1911-1914 Table 3.11: Brown‟s Atlas Works Invoiced Output, Profit and Dividends 117 1900-1914 Table 3.12: Summary of Brown‟s Armour Orders 1904-1914 118 Table 3.13: Brown‟s Armour Production Costs 1906-1911 119 Table 3.14: Hadfields‟ Turnover, Profits and Dividends 1897-1913 122 Table 3.15: Hadfields‟ Work Invoiced and Average Value Per Ton Of 124 Output Table 3.16: Hadfields‟ Armaments Work As A Proportion Of Total 124 Output Table 3.17: Hadfields‟ Invoiced Output For British Army and Navy 128 1900-1914 Table 3.18: Hadfields-British Admiralty Shell Prices 1911 130 Table 3.19: Firth‟s Sales, Profit and Dividends 1899-1913 131 v Table 3.20: Firth‟s British Government Projectile Orders 1900-August 132 1914 Table 3.21: Cammell‟s Shell Orders From British Government, 1900- 135 1914 Table 3.22: Cammell‟s Shell Plant Profits and Losses 1910-1914 135 Table 4.1: Brown-Cammell-Firth-COW Network Cross Directorships To 144 1914 Table 4.2: Firth‟s Foreign Customers for Projectiles 1906-1913 160 Table 4.3: Firth‟s Italian Shell Orders, 1906-1913 161 Table 4.4: Hadfields‟ Foreign Projectile Orders 1909-August 1914 164 Table 4.5: Hadfields‟ Imperial Japanese Navy Orders 1909-August 165 1914 Table 6.1: Admiralty Expenditure on Armaments 1920-1930, and 207 Proportion to Trade (£m) Table 6.2: Capacity to be Retained for Weekly Projectile Production at 212 Hadfields and Firth, 1922-1930 Table 6.3: Brown‟s Atlas Works Invoiced Output, Profit and Dividends 215 1914-1930 Table 6.4: Summary of Brown‟s Armour Orders 1915-1924 217 Table 6.5: Brown‟s Armour Sales and Production 1915-1930 218 Table 6.6: Cammell‟s Sheffield Works (Cyclops, Grimesthorpe, 219 Penistone) Invoiced Output, Profit and Dividends 1914-1928 Table 6.7: Cammell‟s Production and Profits on Armour Sales at 221 Cyclops Works West Forge 1914-1928 Table 6.8: Cammell‟s Production and Profits on Shell Sales at 221
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Heritage Impact Assessment and Historic Buildings Appraisal of the Rising Sun, Bamford, Derbyshire
    An Heritage Impact Assessment and Historic Buildings Appraisal of the Rising Sun, Bamford, Derbyshire ARS Ltd Report 2017/151 OASIS archaeol5-304640 December 2017 Compiled By: Emma Grange and Michelle Burpoe Archaeological Research Services Ltd Angel House Portland Square Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1HB Checked By: Clive Waddington MCIfA Tel: 01629 814540 Fax: 01629 814657 [email protected] www.archaeologicalresearchservices.com A Heritage Impact Assessment and Historic Buildings Appraisal of the Rising Sun, Bamford, Derbyshire A Heritage Impact Assessment and Historic Buildings Appraisal of the Rising Sun, Bamford, Derbyshire Archaeological Research Services Ltd Report 2017/151 December 2017 © Archaeological Research Services Ltd 2017 Angel House, Portland Square, Bakewell, Derbyshire, DE45 1HB www.archaeologicalresearchservices.com Prepared on behalf of: GiGi Developments Ltd Date of compilation: December 2017 Compiled by: Emma Grange and Michelle Burpoe Checked by: Clive Waddington MCIfA Local Planning Authority: Peak District National Park Authority Site central NGR: SK 19489 82837 i A Heritage Impact Assessment and Historic Buildings Appraisal of the Rising Sun, Bamford, Derbyshire EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Research Services Ltd was commissioned by GiGi Developments Ltd to carry out a heritage impact assessment and historic buildings appraisal of the former Rising Sun Public House and Hotel, Bamford, Derbyshire. This heritage impact assessment and historic buildings appraisal has been commissioned ahead of the submission of a planning application for the proposed redevelopment of the site for hotel use with associated car parking to the side and rear. The assessment has identified that the majority of the Rising Sun complex is of a later date than the 18th century and is largely of little historical or architectural significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ARMAMENTS FIRMS, THE STATE PROCUREMENT SYSTEM, AND THE NAVAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN EDWARDIAN BRITAIN Professor Roger Lloyd-Jones History Department, Sheffield Hallam University Dr. Myrddin John Lewis History Department, Sheffield Hallam University This article examines the relationship between Britain’s armament firms and the state’s procurement system, presenting a case for a Naval Industrial Complex (NIC) in the years immediately before the Great War. It argues that in Edwardian Britain a nuanced set of institutional networks were established between the Admiralty and a small elite group of armament manufacturers. The NIC demonstrates the close collaboration between the armament firms supplying the Admiralty and between the Admiralty and an elite group of private contractors. This article concludes that the NIC did not lead to profiteering by contactors, and they did supply the warships and naval ordnance that enabled Britain to out build Germany in the naval race. This paper examines the relationship in Britain between the armaments industry and the military institutions of the state during the years preceding the Great War, when there were intensifying international tensions, and concerns over Britain’s defense capabilities. Through an assessment of the War Office (WO) and Admiralty procurement system, we apply John Kenneth Galbraith’s theory that businesses may establish institutional networks as “countervailing powers” to mediate business-state relations and, thus, we challenge the proposition that the state acted as a “monopsonist,” dominating contractual relations with private armaments firms.’ We argue that during the years prior to the war, Britain’s Naval Industrial Complex (MC) involved a strengthening collaboration between the British Admiralty and the big armament firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 MARCHISIO, GIULIO How to cite: MARCHISIO, GIULIO (2012) Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7323/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 Giulio Marchisio This thesis analyses the rise of private armaments firms in Great Britain and in Italy from mid-19th century to the outbreak of the First World War, with a focus on naval armaments and military shipbuilding. During this period, the armaments industry underwent a radical transformation, moving from being based on public-owned arsenals and yards to being based on private firms – the system of military procurement prevalent today.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham Sheffield
    S T E A D L To Penistone AN S NE H E LA E L E F I RR F 67 N Rainborough Park N O A A C F T E L R To Barnsley and I H 61 E N G W A L A E W D Doncaster A L W N ELL E I HILL ROAD T E L S D A T E E M R N W A R Y E O 67 O G O 1 L E O A R A L D M B N U E A D N E E R O E O Y N TH L I A A C N E A Tankersley N L L W T G N A P E O F A L L A A LA E N LA AL 6 T R N H C 16 FI S 6 E R N K Swinton W KL D 1 E BER A E T King’s Wood O M O 3 D O C O A 5 A H I S 67 OA A W R Ath-Upon-Dearne Y R T T W N R S E E E RR E W M Golf Course T LANE A CA 61 D A 6 A O CR L R R B E O E D O S A N A A S A O M L B R D AN E E L GREA Tankersley Park A CH AN AN A V R B ES L S E E D D TER L LDS N S R L E R R A R Y I E R L Golf Course O N O IE O 6 F O E W O O E 61 T A A F A L A A N K R D H E S E N L G P A R HA U L L E WT F AN B HOR O I E O E Y N S Y O E A L L H A L D E D VE 6 S N H 1 I L B O H H A UE W 6 S A BR O T O E H Finkle Street OK R L C EE F T O LA AN H N F E E L I E A L E A L N H I L D E O F Westwood Y THE River Don D K A E U A6 D H B 16 X ROA ILL AR S Y MANCHES Country Park ARLE RO E TE H W MO R O L WO R A N R E RT RT R H LA N E O CO Swinton Common N W A 1 N Junction 35a D E R D R O E M O A L DR AD O 6 L N A CL AN IV A A IN AYFIELD E OOBE E A A L L H R D A D S 67 NE LANE VI L E S CT L V D T O I H A L R R A E H YW E E I O N R E Kilnhurst A W O LI B I T D L E G G LANE A H O R D F R N O 6 R A O E N I O 2 Y Harley A 9 O Hood Hill ROAD K N E D D H W O R RTH Stocksbridge L C A O O TW R N A Plantation L WE R B O N H E U Y Wentworth A H L D H L C E L W A R E G O R L N E N A
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Armour Steel
    May 26, 2021 Clad in Steel: The Evolution of Armour Steel A little over a century ago, the armed forces of the British Empire received a new type of land-based military vehicle. The British Admiralty led the vehicle’s development in the utmost secrecy. To justify the connection with the Royal Navy, the invention was called a “landship” in official documents. As the Admiralty also managed oil production and processing, it decided to codename this vehicle the “tank” to mislead adversaries. This name is still used for self-propelled tracked armoured combat vehicles. Nowadays, armed forces around the world have hundreds of different types of tanks and other self-propelled vehicles. A key feature that they share is an armoured hull made of specialty grade steel . This protects the crew and critical parts from bullets, shells and other devastating effects. Over the past 100 years, one of the main challenges for designers has been to reduce the weight of armoured vehicles while increasing the level of protection that they provide. Aside from products for military use, civilian applications for armoured vehicles have also been developed. At the beginning of the 20th century, steel plates were used to reinforce the carriages of royalty and high-ranking officials. Today, armoured vehicles are used by heads of state, businesspeople, sport stars and entertainers. They are also used by government agencies and security services, as well as by banks for cash collection and transportation. Below, we discuss what armour is, how these steels evolved, as well as the role that Ukraine played in these developments.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN ARCHAEOLOGY TODAY YORK ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST MAGAZINE Issue 4
    NORTHERN ARCHAEOLOGY TODAY YORK ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRUST MAGAZINE Issue 4 This issue: Arrochar Templeborough Lenton Priory Contents issue 4 November 2013 Welcome! In this issue we travel far and wide, from the majestic landscapes of Loch Long and Loch Lomond to Normandy, where the Friends of YAT investigated Norman architecture in a recent study tour. Hidden Heritage of a Landscape Vengeful Vikings and Reckless Rustlers 1 Closer to home, Trent & Peak Archaeology report on their recent work at Lenton Priory, a little-known house of the Cluniac order in Nottingham, while Lenton Priory, Nottingham 6 within York itself a small site at the former Purey Know Thy Place-Setting Cust Hospital gives us an intriguing glimpse of the Roman fortress of Eboracum and the buildings which Moralising Plates from Hungate 10 succeeded it. Purey Cust, York 15 Carrying on the Roman theme, we also hear from ArcHeritage about the re-evaluation of the fort at Templeborough Roman Fort 18 Templeborough following excavations in 2006–8. Following in the Footsteps of William 23 A Golden Oldie! Oral History update 28 Production & design: Lesley Collett Northern Archaeology Today is published twice a year: UK subscriptions £10.00 per year, Overseas subscriptions £14.00 (sterling) per year. To subscribe please send a cheque (payable to York Archaeological Trust) to: Christine Kyriacou, York Archaeological Trust, 47 Aldwark, York, YO1 7BX or telephone 01904 663000 with credit card details. Northern Archaeology Today is published by York Archaeological Trust. Editorial and contributors’ views are independent and do not necessarily reflect the official view of the Trust. Copyright of all original YAT material reserved: reproduction by prior editorial Cover picture: Walkover Survey on the isthmus between permission only.
    [Show full text]
  • Templeborough to Rotherham Flood Alleviation Scheme – Resolution to Commence a Compulsory Purchase Order 4
    ROTHERHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL – REPORT TO MEMBERS 1. Meeting: Cabinet Member for Economic and Development Services 2. Date: 22 January 2007 3. Title: Templeborough to Rotherham Flood Alleviation Scheme – Resolution to commence a compulsory purchase order 4. Programme Area: Economic and Development Services 5. Summary The implementation of the Templeborough to Rotherham Flood Alleviation Scheme (TRFAS) is a key project underpinning achievement of the Town Centre Renaissance Charter goals in terms of riverside uses. In order to carry out the scheme the diversion of the DOGSTAR gas main (Distribution Of Gas Stocksbridge Templeborough Aldwarke Roundwood) needs to be undertaken in the preferred alignment which is the cart track on the north side of the freight rail line at Centenary Riverside area. Despite extensive enquiries and searches, ownership of this track is uncertain and needs to be resolved in a timely manner. This report seeks a resolution to commence the procedures for the making of a Compulsory Purchase Order (“CPO”) in order to provide a wayleave for the gas main diversion for Corus, the owner of the pipe. This Resolution is a formal part of the CPO process. The purpose of this report is to inform the Cabinet Member of the progress of the TRFAS and to seek authority to pursue a CPO to facilitate the acquisition of interests and rights needed provide the preferred diversion alignment for the DOGSTAR gas main, part of the implementation of the TRFAS. 6. Recommendations 1. That approval is given to the making of a Compulsory Purchase Order pursuant to the provisions of Section 226(1)(a) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990(“TCPA”) ( as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004) and having regard to the Human Rights Act 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Breer Andrew 1253669
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ British Industrial Policy Concerning the Heavy Ordnance Industry, 1900–1917 Breer, Andrew Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 British Industrial Policy Concerning the Heavy Ordnance Industry, 1900–1917 A Thesis Presented in Fulfilment for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Subject of WAR STUDIES By Andrew Breer King’s College, London University of London September 2015 Word Count: 99,865 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank
    Langsett Reservoir Newhill Bow Broom Hingcliff Hill Pilley Green Tankersley Elsecar Roman Terrace Upper Midhope Upper Tankersley SWINTON Underbank Reservoir Midhopestones Green Moor Wortley Lea Brook Swinton Bridge Midhope Reservoir Hunshelf Bank Smithy Moor Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank Gosling Spring Street Horner House Low Harley Barrow Midhope Moors Piccadilly Barnside Moor Wood Willows Howbrook Harley Knoll Top Cortworth Fenny Common Ings Stocksbridge Hoober Kilnhurst Thorncliffe Park Sugden Clough Spink Hall Wood Royd Wentworth Warren Hood Hill High Green Bracken Moor Howbrook Reservoir Potter Hill East Whitwell Carr Head Whitwell Moor Hollin Busk Sandhill Royd Hooton Roberts Nether Haugh ¯ River Don Calf Carr Allman Well Hill Lane End Bolsterstone Ryecroft Charltonbrook Hesley Wood Dog Kennel Pond Bitholmes Wood B Ewden Village Morley Pond Burncross CHAPELTOWN White Carr la Broomhead Reservoir More Hall Reservoir U c Thorpe Hesley Wharncliffe Chase k p Thrybergh Wigtwizzle b Scholes p Thorpe Common Greasbrough Oaken Clough Wood Seats u e Wingfield Smithy Wood r Brighthorlmlee Wharncliffe Side n Greno Wood Whitley Keppel's Column Parkgate Aldwarke Grenoside V D Redmires Wood a Kimberworth Park Smallfield l o The Wheel l Dropping Well Northfield Dalton Foldrings e n Ecclesfield y Grange Lane Dalton Parva Oughtibridge St Ann's Eastwood Ockley Bottom Oughtibridg e Kimberworth Onesacr e Thorn Hill East Dene Agden Dalton Magna Coldwell Masbrough V Bradgate East Herringthorpe Nether Hey Shiregreen
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter June 2013 Contentsadvertisement HDA Newsletter June 2013 Page
    Huntington’s Disease Association Newsletter June 2013 ContentsAdvertisement HDA Newsletter June 2013 Page Message From The Chair 3 Message from the Chief Executive 4 June 2013 Newsletter Information 5 JHD Summary 6 Major Roche-Isis deal boosts Huntington’s disease gene silencing 7 Summary of prevalence of adult HD 10 Train HD Six Monthly Report 10 Liver changes in Huntington’s disease patients suggest more ‘whole body’ research needed 11 Is a new technique set to revolutionize Huntington’s disease genetic testing? 14 Impact Award 18 John Heald, former ChairmanW elcomeand Director of theto HDA 19 Awareness Week 2013 19 Recognition is the name; e-petition is the game 21 NHS Changes - Hopes & Fearsthe 69th 23 Tracing hd – a personal story 24 Personal Independence Payment issue 25 Yoga and HD 26 Young Adult Weekend 2013 of the 28 Fundraising 29 Scroll of Honour Newsletter 46 Branch Update 52 Support Groups and Branches of the HDA 53 News from the RCA Team 65 Staff Contact Details 74 Tributes 75 Forthcoming Events 2013 83 Opinions and recommendations appearing in articles within this Newsletter may not necessarily represent those of the Association. Items which include details of accommodation and services are printed in good faith. Complaints: If you are not satisfied with the services we provide please tell us. You can either do so verbally or contact Head Office for a copy of our Complaints Procedure together with the necessary form. Confidentiality and your right to be heard will be maintained. Editorial Panel: Panel: Sally Phoenix,Cath Stanley, Cath Stanley, Bill Brenda Crowder Stevenson, and Eleni Becky Zacharius Davis Message from the Chair 2013 has started where we Bakewell, Financial Accountant and our dear left in 2012; I have been friends and supporters; Professor Sarah extremely busy working Tabrizi, Professor of Clinical Neurology and with your Executive Dr Ed Wild, Clinical Lecturer in Neurology, Council Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Armour Pdf Free Download
    ARMOUR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Catriona Clarke,Terry McKenna | 32 pages | 26 Jan 2007 | Usborne Publishing Ltd | 9780746074749 | English | London, United Kingdom Armour Thyroid (thyroid tablets, USP) Home Page Keep using this medicine as directed, even if you feel well. You may need to take thyroid medication for the rest of your life. Call your doctor if you notice any signs of thyroid toxicity, such as chest pain, fast or pounding heartbeats, feeling hot or nervous, or sweating more than usual. If you need surgery, tell the surgeon ahead of time that you are using desiccated thyroid. You may need to stop using the medicine for a short time. Take the missed dose as soon as you remember. Skip the missed dose if it is almost time for your next scheduled dose. Do not take extra medicine to make up the missed dose. If you also take cholestyramine Prevalite , Questran or colestipol Colestid , avoid taking these medications within 4 hours before or after you take desiccated thyroid. Avoid taking an antacid within 4 hours before or after you take desiccated thyroid. Some antacids can make it harder for your body to absorb desiccated thyroid. Get emergency medical help if you have signs of an allergic reaction: hives ; difficult breathing; swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat. Common side effects may include temporary hair loss especially in children. This is not a complete list of side effects and others may occur. Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects. Armour Thyroid side effects in more detail. Tell your doctor about all medicines you use, and those you start or stop using during your treatment with desiccated thyroid, especially:.
    [Show full text]
  • Chris Corker
    The business and technology of the Sheffield Armaments industry 1900-1930 CORKER, Christopher John Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/15579/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/15579/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. The Business and Technology of the Sheffield Armaments Industry 1900-1930 Christopher John Corker A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2016 Abstract This exploration of the Sheffield armaments industry focuses on four in-depth case studies of John Brown, Cammell-Laird, Thomas Firth and Hadfields to examine the business and technology of the industry. It builds on the work of Tweedale and Trebilcock on Sheffield and armaments, and advances the argument that during the period of study from 1900 to 1930, the city was one of the most important centres for armaments research and production anywhere in the world. The business of the armaments industry is explored through an examination of the evolving links the industry had with the Government against the backdrop of an uncertain trading environment, and the managerial connections established between the state and private industry.
    [Show full text]