Dated 9Th April 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dated 9Th April 2021 9TH APRIL 2021 THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE MONTHLY £3.50 How the Civil Service has Coped with Brexit Jill Rutter ad a Brexit unit been set up at referendum. But there are also some decision had been made. the time of the renegotiation – hard questions for the civil service to The replacement of Theresa May by Hor indeed when the ask itself about the extent to which it Boris Johnson has – contrary to what referendum was first floated – it might forced ministers to think through the many expected – made the civil have given an indication of the scale of detailed consequences of their decision service’s life much easier. This was a the task of untangling the UK-EU to put UK membership on the line, not Government with a clear set of relationship. Forty-five years of EU least the very stark implications for the priorities; sovereignty first, economy membership meant not only that the future of the Union in general and second. The installation of David impact of the EU was both deep and Northern Ireland in particular. Frost, a Political Appointee as Chief wide, but also that it was somewhat Negotiator, proved an unlikely boon: it taken for granted and hence poorly Brexit reversed cuts in removed any sense that the civil understood. There was little focus on civil service numbers service (which supplies the rest of the how the border with the EU operated, There was another respect in which the negotiating team) was pursuing its the relationship between EU civil service was not ready for Brexit. own agenda, independent of ministers. membership and devolution within the Since 2009 its size had been on a The Frost team – with its two civil UK, or the implications of the Single steady downward trajectory – and the service deputies – was prepared to Market and Customs Union for trading Government had plans for a further big work more closely with the UK’s EU patterns. reduction after 2015. As Deloitte experts in Brussels than the Robbins “The civil service faced two stated, that was not sustainable in the team ever did. The civil service has challenges: skills and numbers. Brexit face of Brexit. come under fire in 2020 but not due to meant developing capabilities – like Theresa May’s first acts on the Brexit negotiations. trade negotiation – that Whitehall had becoming Prime Minister were to not needed for decades. The civil create two new Government The post-Brexit balance sheet service had to hunt for external talent departments: the temporary So has the civil service survived the to fill gaps.” Department for Exiting the EU ‘existential threat’ from Brexit? And it was not just the EU (DExEU) and the permanent It is bigger. It has attracted new relationship that was poorly Department for International Tr a d e . blood. And it can take pride in the fact understood. Taking Brexit forward The consequences of these so-called that it has supported a Government to also meant understanding the machinery of government changes get the sort of Brexit it wanted. Even if complexity of a relationship with the were, in the words of Philip many will say that the negotiations devolved governments, which was Hammond, ‘not deeply thought could have been handled better, both predicated on a framework of EU through’. The creation of a under May and Johnson, it is clearly membership. Meanwhile, the freestanding Brexit department led to now the politicians who own the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement had inevitable tensions with No.10, which outcome. Down the line, ministers sunk into the background of ultimately wanted to control the may complain that they were not Whitehall’s collective memory. negotiations; and the creation of the warned of unexpected consequences, There is a lot of political blame to new trade department appeared to but the fact that David Frost be handed out for the casual way in signal that the UK would leave the personified the exit negotiations means which politicians approached the EU’s Customs Union before any such Continued on page 2 INSIDE: On going EU payments p 3 - The EU agency that eats well p 3 - The Northern Ireland Protocol p 4 – Crowd funding p 5 - Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) - Letters p 6 VOL 26 NO 8 How the Civil Service has Coped with Brexit Jill Rutter Continued from page 1 The civil service will also have to The danger is that the atmospherics at he will be held responsible for that. find a way of hanging on to what EU the top – the Cummings legacy – mean Ministers, for their part, can take expertise it has left. It will no longer be that top civil servants are too reluctant comfort from confounding Whitehall able tempt good people to Brussels to call out dubious practices and gloomsters like Sir Ivan Rogers, with the lure of being ‘in the room confront ministers with challenging who warned, where it happens’ – or at least not in the advice. “It Could Take 10 Years to do a free main room. The UK will not be trade deal with the EU”. negotiating Kim Darroch’s widgets The Civil Service response to Covid directive, but it will be on an The civil service rose to the challenge The next big challenge from Brexit intelligence gathering mission to find of Brexit, particularly once ministers is to see what the UK can do with its out what the widgets directive might finally made clear what they thought new found powers. Much of the day- say and whether it needs to launch an Brexit meant. The additional challenge to-day task of making Brexit work will influencing strategy to try to stop it of Covid-19 exposed weaknesses – as fall not to Whitehall but to the arm’s harming British interests. well as some surprising strengths – length bodies who have taken over The Trade and Cooperation though only a full-blown public many of the responsibilities formerly Agreement sets up a massive inquiry will make clear how blame exercised by the Commission. T h e superstructure of committees to should be apportioned between government has signed up to give new oversee its operation. Understanding ministers and their civil and public the way the EU operates will still servants. But Brexit and the handling powers to quangos – the Competition matter. The ‘judge over your shoulder’ of Covid-19 both showed up areas that and Markets Authority and the Office guide which warns civil servants of the would benefit from reform, as well as for Environmental Protection among need to think about the risk of judicial new ways of working that need to be them. There is a tricky relationship review, will sit alongside the ‘eurocrat sustained. Ministers may, for example, with these semi-independent bodies to in the corner’, watching to see if the be keen to draw lessons from manage if they are to have enough UK is tilting the level playing field too t h e SUCCESS OF THE VA C C I N E credibility to do their job convincingly. far. There are dangers for the civil TASK FORCE and see whether that But there are also new policies to be service in the gap between the gung-ho model can be applied elsewhere. made, and made work, in areas where optimism of ministers and the reality of Whitehall has not had policy discretion what they have signed up to. At the As the UK heads into a future and associated expertise for decades. moment it is hard to say how outside the EU, the civil service will be Defra made an ALMIGHTY HASH constraining the agreement will prove keen to show that it can help ministers OF IMPLEMENTING CAP to be in practice. And the UK will need as they take back control and show the REFORM (a reform it had advocated) to establish a basis for working Governments of the EU that the UK in the 2000’s, ending up paying a positively with the EU on the shared can indeed make policy better alone. stream of fines to Brussels: will it be interests the Prime Minister repeatedly Ministers, in turn, need to show that able to manage the radically different mentions: the first big test will be the after a bruising period, they can work agricultural support scheme? climate change summit at the end of effectively with their civil servants. There are question marks too over the year. They also need to reassure, by actions trade policy. The Department for The biggest risk to the civil service as well as words, that they still value a International Trade can be quietly is that ministers who claimed, in non-partisan civil service – or initiate a satisfied that it has succeeded in rolling defiance of the economic assessments, public debate on the alternative. over so many of the trade agreements it that the UK will prosper mightily, deal inherited from our years as an EU or no deal, are disappointed when they Jill Rutter is a Senior Research Fellow m e m b e r. But can it deliver to find that Brexit has not given them at UK in a Changing Europe and a ministers’ expectations, not least when massive new levers to deliver their former Treasury Civil Servant. they still seem unwilling to engage wider agenda. If they are just interested This article first appeared on the with the very real trade-offs and in policy as performance art or symbol, website of UK in a Changing Europe, choices they need to make to have a it may not matter that immediate where a fuller report is available.
Recommended publications
  • European Parliamentary Election
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION – EASTERN REGION Thursday, 22 May 2014 STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES NOMINATED AND NOTICE OF POLL The following parties and individual candidates have been and stand nominated An Independence British National Party Christian Peoples Conservative Party – English Democrats – Green Party Labour Party Li beral Democrats NO2EU - Yes to UK Independence from Europe – UK - Fighting Alliance For real change in I’m English, NOT Workers’ Rights Party (UKIP) Independence Now Unsustainable Europe British, NOT Housing Because We EUropean! Care Paul Kevin Wiffen Richard Andrew Perry Carl Shaun Clark Vicky Ford Robin Tilbrook Rupert Read Richard Stuart Howitt Andrew Nicholas Duff Brian Denny Patrick James O’Flynn 9 Cedar Park Gardens Millhouse Hotel 41 Ripon Way 86 High Street Quires Green 17 Merton Road 68 Mawson Road 15 Mount Pleasant 177 Western Road 10 Sunderland Road Chadwell Heath Maldon Road Thetford Balsham Willingale Norwich Cambridge Cambridge Leigh-on-Sea London Romford Langford Norfolk Cambridge Essex NR2 3TT Cambridgeshire CB3 0BL Essex W5 4JY Essex Maldon IP24 1DF CB21 4EP CM5 0QP CB1 2EA SS9 2PQ RM6 4DS Essex England CM9 4SS Karl Berresford Davies Christopher Eric Mark Anthony Clamp Geoffrey Charles Van Charles Vickers Mark Ereira Alex Mayer Josephine Mary Hayes Eleanor Mary Donne Stuart Agnew 54 Mayford Road Livingstone 9 The Oaks Orden 23 Norton Way North Camperdown House Elba 2 Greens Yard 86 Rowenhall Paxfield Farm Balham Millhouse Hotel Ashill The Box House Letchworth Garden City 18
    [Show full text]
  • Spectre of Hate An Explanatory Guide to the Far Right in the UK
    SPECTRE OF HATE An Explanatory Guide to the Far Right in the UK Part of the Cordoba Manuals Series March 2015. ISSN 2048-7711 The Cordoba Foundation is an independent strategic think tank aimed at promoting intercultural dialogue and positive coexistence, through a range of activities including research and publications, training and capacity building, policy briefings and dialogues. The Foundation takes its name from the city of Cordoba. The European metropolis was once a symbol of human excellence and intellectual ingenuity, where cultures, civilisations and ideas thrived. Embodying this spirit, TCF today facilitates the meeting of minds, to advance understanding and respect for one another. Our activities include: Structured consultation and advisory services. Face-to-face interaction with decision-makers and figures of authority. In-house research. Workshops, seminars and debates on pertinent issues. Training and capacity-building. Periodicals and journals. Resourceful website. www.thecordobafoundation.com [email protected] The Cordoba Foundation @CordobaFoundati ISSN 2048-7711 © The Cordoba Foundation 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any way or by any means, without the express permission of The Cordoba Foundation. Date of publication: March 2015. Printed in England. Disclaimer Views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the respective authors/ contributors and do not necessarily represent a corporate view of the publishers. Acknowledgements Special thanks to everyone who contributed material or agreed to be interviewed in this guide. Photo credits William Barylo, Salman Farsi, Rehan Jamil and F. Amin. Cover image: The mural on Cable Street, East End of London depicts the memorable events of 4 October 1936, when a march by Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists was stopped by thousands of local people.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated 31.10.12)
    Police and Crime Commissioners: Who’s running? (updated 31.10.12) This table lists those candidates who are confirmed as standing in the first elections for Police and Crime Commissioners on 15 November 2012. For more information on these candidates, click on their name. To view to view a historical list of all candidates, including unsuccessful candidates and those who withdrew, scroll down to the second table. Force Conservatives Labour Liberal Democrats UKIP Other parties Independent Avon and Somerset Ken Maddock John Savage Pete Levy Sue Mountstevens Bedfordshire Jas Parmar Oliver Martins Linda Jack Kevin Carroll (British Freedom/EDL) Mezanur Rashid Cambridgeshire Graham Bright Ed Murphy Rupert Moss- Paul Bullen Stephen Goldspink (English Ansar Ali Eccardt Democrats) Farooq Mohammed Cheshire John Dwyer John Stockton Ainsley Arnold Louise Bours Sarah Flannery Cleveland Ken Lupton Barry Coppinger Joe Michna (Green Party) Sultan Alam Cumbria Richard Rhodes Patrick Leonard Pru Jupe Mary Robinson Derbyshire Simon Spencer Alan Charles David Gale Rod Hutton Devon and Cornwall Tony Hogg Nicky Williams Brian Blake Bob Smith Graham Calderwood Brian Greenslade Ivan Jordan Tam MacPherson William Morris John Smith Dorset Nick King Rachel Rogers Andy Canning Martyn Underhill Durham Nick Varley Ron Hogg Mike Costello Kingsley Smith Dyfed-Powys Christopher Salmon Christine Gwyther Essex Nicholas Alston Val Morris-Cook Andrew Smith Robin Tilbrook (English Democrats) Linda Belgrove Mick Thwaites Gloucestershire Victoria Atkins Rupi Dhanda Alistair
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasters' Liaison Group (BLG) Meeting, 8 February 2005
    Broadcasters’ Liaison Group (BLG) meeting, 8 February 2005 Note of conclusions and action points Present: Paul Chinnery (Five), Emma Jones (S4C), David Jordan (BBC) (chair), Peter Lowe (BSkyB), Ian McBride (ITV), Lisa McLaughlin (BBC Scotland), Prash Naik (Channel 4), Nick Powell (HTV), Ian Pratt (BBC Wales), Rob Shepherd (BBC), Martin Stott (Five), Derrick Thomson (SMG). In attendance: Jane Harris (Electoral Commission), Tabby Karamat (BBC), Jaron Lewis (BBC). Apologies: Eleanor Aitken (BBC Scotland), Andrew Colman (BBC Northern Ireland), Nerys Hopkins (S4C), Rob Morrison (UTV), Huw Roberts (BBC Wales), Nick Toon (Channel 4). Venue: 28 Portland Place, London 1. MEETINGS WITH POLITICAL PARTIES On 11 January 2005 the group had held separate meetings with representatives of the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democratic parties. The group now met representatives of twelve further political parties from Great Britain who were expected to stand sufficient candidates at elections in 2005 to qualify for a PEB. The main purpose of the meeting was to canvas the views of the parties about how PEB slots are allocated during the 2005 elections, and in particular any forthcoming General Election. Meetings were held with the parties in the following order: 1. Scottish National Party (Peter Murrell) 2. UKIP (Mike Nattrass and Nigel Farage) 3. English Democrats (Robin Tilbrook & 2 others) 4. BNP (Richard Barnbrook, Roderick Gordon and Eddie Butler) 5. English and Welsh Greens (Matt Wooton) 6. Scottish Greens (George Baxter) 7. Scottish Socialist Party (Eddie Truman) 8. Respect (Rob Hoveman) 9. Socialist Labour Party (John Hayball) 10. Operation Christian Voice/Christian Democrat Party (Rev Hargreaves) 11. Veritas (Martin Cole and David Soutter) Plaid Cymru had been invited but did not attend.
    [Show full text]
  • After BREXIT Independence for England? - After Brexit-Independence for England P.1 BREXIT Looks Like It Will finally Happen
    Newsletter ISSUE No. 23 January 2020 Inside this Issue After BREXIT Independence for England? - After Brexit-Independence for England p.1 BREXIT looks like it will finally happen. It would Life exists outside London -Election Planning for 2020 even appear that Boris has a plan. The Development of the Northern (could you be a local Government continues to state that they wish Powerhouse or the 'left behind areas to diverge from the EU rules. The EU of England’ is a priority! If you live in candidate for the English continues to say that this failure to adhere to SE England it is easy to assume that Democrats p.2 the various regulations of the EU will rule out a opportunity is spread equally all over -Thoughts on GE2019 by Trade Deal. So the question is: will the England. We need to address the fact Robin Tilbrook p.2 Government just leave the EU on January 31, that Westminster spends too much - Editorial p.2 2020 under WTO rules. It's clear that the Ports time improving the lot of their own -Tale of a Charitable Trust by in France are preparing for something big as bubble. London needs to stop seeing Graham Moore p.3 separate channels are being built to take UK itself as the centre of the UK -Why Charitable Trusts are only traffic. This is much earlier than required if (accounting for a disproportionate fleecing English taxpayers p.3 we were only leaving fully at the end of 2020 amount of Government spending) and -Hurrah for England p.4 (or later if the EU are to be believed).
    [Show full text]
  • A UKIP View of the Brexit Deal
    5TH FEBRUARY 2021 THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE MONTHLY £3.50 A UKIP view of the Brexit deal Neil Hamilton n an article for UKIP N e i l flourish for another five and a half ‘Partnership Council’ made up of UK Hamilton expressed the wishes of years, with Frau von der Leyen and EU representatives. A l o n g s i d e Imany UKIP members when he gloating that the EU has secured this, it has spawned of a raft of wrote his views on the EU Brexit deal “strong tools to incentivise” the UK to specialised committees. The document entitled, ‘This Brexit deal is better than continue allowing their trawlers into is also scattered with reviews after four remaining, but No Deal would have British waters after 2026. years on many aspects of the been best for Britain’. The “bribe” (as ‘Fishing for Leave’ agreement. We must be sure that this “A deal has been deal has been put it) of a £100m funding package is Council cannot abuse the reviews as an agreed and we are finally over the line. nothing more than a consolation effort. opportunity to return us to EU control. I am pleased that we are no longer British fishermen know that they are I had hoped that we’d cut ourselves subservient to the EU after 47 long being shafted out of the billions that free from rule by bureaucrats. years. But, Boris’s deal - though could be made if we opted now to In a spectacular Tory U-turn, Boris obviously a better outcome than reclaim 100% of our fishing grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Background 26-05-2019 - 15:11 Reference No: 20190516BKG51011
    Background 26-05-2019 - 15:11 Reference No: 20190516BKG51011 European elections 2019: country sheets This booklet contains fact sheets with information on electoral rules, poll opening and closing times and candidates for the 2019 European election in EU member states. Press Service, Directorate General for Communication 1 I 80 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume DUCH GUILLOT EN Press switchboard number (32-2) 28 33000 Background Key data and candidates country-by-country Disclaimer: this is informal background information intended to help journalists covering the work of the European Parliament. Press Service, Directorate General for Communication 2 I 80 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume DUCH GUILLOT EN Press switchboard number (32-2) 28 33000 Background Further information Website: European election results European Parliament elections 2019 press tool kit EP press service contacts Contacts EP Press Service Press Service, Directorate General for Communication 3 I 80 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume DUCH GUILLOT EN Press switchboard number (32-2) 28 33000 Background AUSTRIA – REPUBLIK ÖSTERREICH European elections, 23 - 26 May 2019, country sheet: Austria · Official EE19 website https://www.bmi.gv.at/412/Europawahlen/Euro pawahl_2019 · Other elections/referenda held the same day none · Number of MEPs before/after Brexit 18/19 · Current government ÖVP (EPP) & FPÖ (ENF) since October 2017 ELECTORAL RULES · Obligatory vote no · Number of constituencies 1 · Preferential vote yes · Postal vote yes (2014: 5.6 % of votes)
    [Show full text]
  • Options for an English Parliament
    DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OPTIONS FOR AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT MEG RUSSELL AND JACK SHELDON OPTIONS FOR AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT Meg Russell and Jack Sheldon The Constitution Unit University College London March 2018 ISBN: 978-1-903903-80-3 Published by: The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy University College London 29-31 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU United Kingdom Tel: 020 7679 4977 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit © The Constitution Unit, UCL, 2018 This report is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First published March 2018 Front cover image: © Gareth Young, 2010. Contents List of Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... ix Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... x 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Part 1: Context ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Hate 2017 Download
    H PE STATE OF not hate special A HOPE not hate special report into extremism in Britain and Europe today 2017 HATE www.hopenothate.org.uk The year hate went mainstream HOPE not hate challenges organised hate and Become a intolerance within our society. We mobilise communities by providing a positive alternative to the politics of hate. Friend of For as little as £5 a month you can play your part in ensuring that we continue our work to bring communities together in the face of hate. In return for a small monthly donation, you will receive: H PE n Six issues of the HOPE not hate magazine every year n A copy of all HOPE not hate publications not hate n An annual invitation to a private briefing with the HOPE not hate founder and Chief Executive, Nick Lowles n An invitation to an annual HOPE not hate dinner EDDIE IZZARD BEVERLEY KNIGHT MEERA Syal FIONA PHILLIPS SIMON RIMMER LEVI ROOTS Billy BRAGG SPEECH DEBELLE GLENYS KINNOCK JOIN OUR patRONS OF HOPE NOT hatE I want to become a Friend of HOPE not hate Please complete the details on this form below or visit www.hopenothate.org.uk/friend Pay BY StaNDING ORDER Your details Dear Bank Manager, I want to make a monthly gift to HOPE Title not hate of £5.00 or £ _________ each month until further First name notice, starting immediately, please debit the account below. Last name Your bank details Bank name Address Address Postcode Email Postcode Telephone Account no HOPE not hate will not pass on your details to any third party HOPE not hate will occasionally contact you about our campaigns and Sort code supporter information.
    [Show full text]
  • Dated 7Th February 2020
    7TH FEBRUARY 2020 THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE MONTHLY £3.50 The cost of EU membership e have included the intellectual justification for the figure.] following as a reminder to existence of EEC and later the EU and So let us put that into a naive cash Wall those who wondered the driver for even greater political and figure from the IMF data. why we are leaving the EU. economic union is wholly and entirely UK GDP in 2015 according to the “Many people have questioned the misconceived. That would mean the IMF data was the US dollar equivalent actual cost of EU membership to the whole of Europe has been paying a of US$2.7 trillion. [The IMF figures taxpayers’ of the UK. What follows is heavy price to Brussels and in lost are Gross domestic product based on an attempt to find out! GDP over decades for nothing. It also purchasing-power-parity (PPP)]. This interesting analysis in terms of takes away the rationale for increased UK GDP is projected by the IMF to EU membership, asks how much European social, political, economic rise in 2021 to approaching US$3.4 poorer has the UK become year-on- and military union. Trillion. year in cash terms? And how much There is a better rationale for such For the 2015 figure 13.8% is poorer is the UK today as a union but it is not the one seemingly US$370 Billion extra GDP. consequence of the cumulative effect driving the EU and its foundations are And on the basis of the projection on the nation’s wealth over 46 years of also structurally constitutionally and for 2021, that is an addition to GDP of lower annual growth? What would UK politically inappropriate for such a US$470 Billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Questions in National and EU Courts
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8415, 1 November 2019 Brexit questions in By Vaughne Miller national and EU courts Sylvia de Mars Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Roles of Government and Parliament in the Brexit process 3. The revocability of Article 50 4. UK referendum rules and validity of EU referendum 5. EU procedure infringed EU Treaties? 6. EU citizenship rights: the ‘Amsterdam case’ 7. Extradition to UK using European Arrest Warrant 8. EU trademark protection 9. Future EU-UK relations www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Brexit questions in national and EU courts Contents Summary 4 1. Introduction 6 2. Roles of Government and Parliament in the Brexit process 8 2.1 The Miller case 8 2.2 Elizabeth Webster 9 2.3 Extending Article 50 10 Robin Tilbrook (English Democrats) 10 Barry Legg 12 2.4 Proroguing Parliament 13 Gina Miller 13 Cross-party challenge at Scottish Outer House, Court of Session 13 Supreme Court rules that prorogation was “unlawful” 14 Raymond McCord case 14 3. The revocability of Article 50 16 3.1 What Article 50 says 16 3.2 The Dublin case 17 3.3 Wightman and Others 17 Question for the CJEU 20 UK Government appeals 20 Is primary legislation required to authorise a revocation? 22 The expedited procedure 22 CJEU hearing 22 Advocate General’s Opinion 23 4. UK referendum rules and validity of EU referendum 26 4.1 Harry Shindler 26 CJEU Judgment 27 Appeal is lost 27 4.2 Irregularities in referendum campaigns 27 ‘Good Law Project’ challenge 27 Susan Wilson and Others 30 Marcus Ball v Boris Johnson 31 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2008
    Local Election Results May 2008 Andrew Teale August 15, 2016 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2008 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2012. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file, together with its LATEX source code, is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations9 I Greater London Authority 11 1 Mayor of London 12 2 Greater London Assembly Constituency Results 13 3 Greater London Assembly List Results 16 II Metropolitan Boroughs 19 4 Greater Manchester 20 4.1 Bolton.................................. 20 4.2 Bury.................................... 21 4.3 Manchester............................... 23 4.4 Oldham................................. 25 4.5 Rochdale................................ 27 4.6 Salford................................. 28 4.7 Stockport................................ 29 4.8 Tameside................................. 31 4.9 Trafford................................. 32 4.10 Wigan.................................. 34 5 Merseyside 36 5.1 Knowsley................................ 36 5.2 Liverpool................................ 37 5.3 Sefton.................................. 39 5.4 St Helens................................. 41 5.5 Wirral.................................. 43 6 South Yorkshire 45 6.1 Barnsley................................ 45 6.2 Doncaster............................... 47 6.3 Rotherham............................... 48 6.4 Sheffield................................ 50 3 4 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2008 7 Tyne and Wear 53 7.1 Gateshead............................... 53 7.2 Newcastle upon Tyne........................
    [Show full text]