Ireland Teeters on the Brink of a Financial and Economic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ireland Teeters on the Brink of a Financial and Economic 30TH JANUARY 2009 THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE FORTNIGHTLY £1.50 It’s time to be rude about the EU - everyone else is! Many now recognise that the aspirations of the EU vastly exceed its competence and also grasp - though they have been slow to do so - that the appointment of a permanent presidency will not solve the problem n numerous occasions in the past which does not look like being anytime country with a population of only five Oeurofacts has pointed to the sheer soon. million and the one most adversely uselessness of the European Union in a “Many Israeli leaders believe that affected by the Russian decision to cut crisis. The interesting thing is that the the EU does not have much to offer off gas supplies, should have decided rest of the world, including many past their security and therefore pay little that it could not rely on the EU to admirers of the European project, is attention to the EU in times of crisis,” protect its interests during the crisis. It now coming to the same conclusion. it said. signalled its lack of confidence in the A front-page article in the In the case of the energy crisis in Commission by sending its own International Herald Tr i b u n e f r o m Eastern Europe Brussels put its mission to Moscow. Associated Press - which can normally credibility conspicuously on the line In Central Europe it was long argued be relied upon to reflect majority by launching a high-profile diplomatic that small countries would have greater opinion on foreign policy issues - initiative to get the gas flowing. influence in the world as part of a declared on 17th January: President Barroso is reported to have larger entity, and that EU membership “Who listens to the EU these days? talked to Prime Minister Putin at least would provide protection against Not Russia and Ukraine, who ignore four times and also talked to his Russian bullying and intimidation. Europe’s pleas to resume gas deliveries Ukrainian counterpart, Yu l i a Eastern and Central Europeans know to Western Europe. Nor Israel, whose Tymosehnko. Mirek Topolanek, the different and this is bound to colour relentless assault on the Gaza strip prime minister of the Czech Republic, their attitudes towards the wider continued amid EU demands for which now holds the rotating EU European project. They sought EU moderation.” presidency, visited Moscow and Kiev. membership on the basis of a fatal It seems that those busy not listening But after eight days of negotiating it misconception: they now know that even include European member states. became clear that Moscow, like Israel when the going gets tough you are on At the height of EU attempts to and China (which abruptly cancelled your own, and the EU can even get in negotiate a peace settlement in Gaza the China-EU summit scheduled for your way. both Nicolas Sarkozy and German 2008 because it saw little value in the foreign minister Frank Steinmeier meeting) has a clear preference for Large Bloc launched their own missions drawing dealing with nation states. accusations of grand-standing from Andrew Wilson, a senior fellow at the The argument that the national one another as well as from Brussels European Council on Foreign interest is best enhanced by officials. Relations complained to the membership of a large bloc has echoes International Herald Tr i b u n e: of those which have figured Security Role “Moscow was very rude to EU officials prominently in the ongoing debate and has been very sceptical of the between British eurosceptics and their During the same week the pro-EU Czechs. They may be waiting for big opponents. It is still routinely London-based Centre for European EU members to step in.” advanced by officials at the FO, and it Reform produced a report which is this belief which stands in the way of acknowledged that the EU would have Adversely Affected the robust assertion of national little clout in the Middle East until it interest, although no other EU member could “play a relevant security role” - It was also striking that Slovakia, a Continued on p.2 INSIDE: EU fight against corruption p.2 - Ken Clarke: what kind of Big Beast? p.2 - Ireland teeters on the break of a financial catastrophe p.3 - As the recession takes hold Brussels continues to build its empire p.4 - Working Time Directive to cost Britain billions p.4 - British MEPs to receive huge pay increase p.4 - Review of “After Tamerlane The Rise & Fall of Global Empires 1400-2000 p.5 - Dave talks tough on Europe p.6 VOL 14 NO 8 EU fight against corruption ‘makes no difference’ ach year the EU spends millions to and justice. (EUBAM) which was set up in Ehelp fight corruption, human Asylum and migration projects were September 2005 to help the two t r a fficking and smuggling in the the least satisfactory, with projects countries manage their 1,200 km long Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus - all facing huge delays, especially in the common border was successful “from aspiring members of the EU - but Ukraine. a technical point of view”. But, not according to a report from the Mr Uczkiewicz singled out two being a peace keeping mission, it could European Court of Auditors the money former military sites which the not solve the problem of the frozen is having little impact.* authorities were supposed to refurbish conflict in Moldova’s separatist region Often the projects launched by the and equip as migrant accommodation of Transnistria, say the auditors. EU seemed to be used more for self- centres for 1,260 persons, with an EU EUBAM found that Transnistria was publicity by local politicians and contribution of €3.8 million. By the a safe haven for smugglers, human officials than for the public good, Jacek end of 2006, several months after the traffickers and tax evasion. The report Uczkiewicz, a member of the Court of scheduled completion date, the project also noted that due to the level of Auditors said at a press conference had still not even started. corruption in the prosecutors’ offices 15th January: The only clear improvement observed smugglers were frequently released “The visibility of the projects seemed was found in the management of and were immediately able to return to to be designed for the prestige of the borders, although the goal of achieving their trade. officials, not for the citizens,” said Mr standards “approximating to European Uczkiewicz. good practice” was still a long way *Special Report No 9/2008: The The report covers the expenditure of from being achieved. effectiveness of EU support in the area €166 million during the period 2000- The European Border A s s i s t a n c e of freedom, security and justice and 2005 in the area of freedom, security Mission to Moldova and Ukraine Ukraine. Ken Clarke: what kind of Big Beast? ill Kenneth Clarke turn out to be Cameron’s attitude to party discipline wishes to be seen as modern, even Wa loyal, trustworthy and which is bound to jar with eurosceptic “post-modern” and “cool”. His new industrious member of the Tory front sensibilities. Those who have signed shadow Business Secretary is none of bench? All things are possible in up to the Better Off Out Campaign - these things. He stands for the same politics, and so eurofacts, whose views and they include at least one obvious beliefs as when he entered politics as a on this matter readers will not find contender for a front-bench post - young Bow Grouper 40 years ago. He difficult to discern, stands ready to eat continue to be told that their careers are believes in big government, the its hat. For Mr Cameron it would seem doomed until such time as they recant. welfare state - and ‘Europe’. No to be enough that Clarke is deemed to In contrast, the Great Ken, a man who matter that two of these have been be “a Big Beast”. wants Britain to join the euro, and who tested almost to destruction and the Of course eurosceptics are bound to once said he looked forward to the time third is in decline even before its be irritated by Clarke’s return to front- when Parliament had no more powers completion date. bench politics, but Mr Cameron’s allies than a county council and who marked It may not be the kind of ‘Big Beast’ are quick to point to his promotion of his return to the centre stage by saying the political correspondents are talking eurosceptics such as Eric Pickles and that he hadn’t changed his views one about but we suspect that the Great Mark Francois as proof of their iota, has been given a starring role. Ken will come to resemble a large and leader’s eurosceptic-ish leanings. There is one other oddity about his ageing sea creature left stranded on the H o w e v e r, there is one aspect of appointment. Mr Cameron apparently beach after the retreat of the tide. Continued from p.1 Time to be rude about the EU appears inhibited in this way. that neither the replacement of the complained that the British political On our letters page (p.6) one of our rotating presidency with a permanent class, having lost sight of the national readers complains that the British have presidency nor other forms of interest long ago, blindly rush off to been discouraged from robustly institutional tinkering - will overcome please their EU masters when a robust defending their interests as the result of the problems arising from competing “ * * * o f f” message would serve us “a paralysis of courtesy”.
Recommended publications
  • European Parliamentary Election
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION – EASTERN REGION Thursday, 22 May 2014 STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES NOMINATED AND NOTICE OF POLL The following parties and individual candidates have been and stand nominated An Independence British National Party Christian Peoples Conservative Party – English Democrats – Green Party Labour Party Li beral Democrats NO2EU - Yes to UK Independence from Europe – UK - Fighting Alliance For real change in I’m English, NOT Workers’ Rights Party (UKIP) Independence Now Unsustainable Europe British, NOT Housing Because We EUropean! Care Paul Kevin Wiffen Richard Andrew Perry Carl Shaun Clark Vicky Ford Robin Tilbrook Rupert Read Richard Stuart Howitt Andrew Nicholas Duff Brian Denny Patrick James O’Flynn 9 Cedar Park Gardens Millhouse Hotel 41 Ripon Way 86 High Street Quires Green 17 Merton Road 68 Mawson Road 15 Mount Pleasant 177 Western Road 10 Sunderland Road Chadwell Heath Maldon Road Thetford Balsham Willingale Norwich Cambridge Cambridge Leigh-on-Sea London Romford Langford Norfolk Cambridge Essex NR2 3TT Cambridgeshire CB3 0BL Essex W5 4JY Essex Maldon IP24 1DF CB21 4EP CM5 0QP CB1 2EA SS9 2PQ RM6 4DS Essex England CM9 4SS Karl Berresford Davies Christopher Eric Mark Anthony Clamp Geoffrey Charles Van Charles Vickers Mark Ereira Alex Mayer Josephine Mary Hayes Eleanor Mary Donne Stuart Agnew 54 Mayford Road Livingstone 9 The Oaks Orden 23 Norton Way North Camperdown House Elba 2 Greens Yard 86 Rowenhall Paxfield Farm Balham Millhouse Hotel Ashill The Box House Letchworth Garden City 18
    [Show full text]
  • Spectre of Hate An Explanatory Guide to the Far Right in the UK
    SPECTRE OF HATE An Explanatory Guide to the Far Right in the UK Part of the Cordoba Manuals Series March 2015. ISSN 2048-7711 The Cordoba Foundation is an independent strategic think tank aimed at promoting intercultural dialogue and positive coexistence, through a range of activities including research and publications, training and capacity building, policy briefings and dialogues. The Foundation takes its name from the city of Cordoba. The European metropolis was once a symbol of human excellence and intellectual ingenuity, where cultures, civilisations and ideas thrived. Embodying this spirit, TCF today facilitates the meeting of minds, to advance understanding and respect for one another. Our activities include: Structured consultation and advisory services. Face-to-face interaction with decision-makers and figures of authority. In-house research. Workshops, seminars and debates on pertinent issues. Training and capacity-building. Periodicals and journals. Resourceful website. www.thecordobafoundation.com [email protected] The Cordoba Foundation @CordobaFoundati ISSN 2048-7711 © The Cordoba Foundation 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any way or by any means, without the express permission of The Cordoba Foundation. Date of publication: March 2015. Printed in England. Disclaimer Views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the respective authors/ contributors and do not necessarily represent a corporate view of the publishers. Acknowledgements Special thanks to everyone who contributed material or agreed to be interviewed in this guide. Photo credits William Barylo, Salman Farsi, Rehan Jamil and F. Amin. Cover image: The mural on Cable Street, East End of London depicts the memorable events of 4 October 1936, when a march by Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists was stopped by thousands of local people.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated 31.10.12)
    Police and Crime Commissioners: Who’s running? (updated 31.10.12) This table lists those candidates who are confirmed as standing in the first elections for Police and Crime Commissioners on 15 November 2012. For more information on these candidates, click on their name. To view to view a historical list of all candidates, including unsuccessful candidates and those who withdrew, scroll down to the second table. Force Conservatives Labour Liberal Democrats UKIP Other parties Independent Avon and Somerset Ken Maddock John Savage Pete Levy Sue Mountstevens Bedfordshire Jas Parmar Oliver Martins Linda Jack Kevin Carroll (British Freedom/EDL) Mezanur Rashid Cambridgeshire Graham Bright Ed Murphy Rupert Moss- Paul Bullen Stephen Goldspink (English Ansar Ali Eccardt Democrats) Farooq Mohammed Cheshire John Dwyer John Stockton Ainsley Arnold Louise Bours Sarah Flannery Cleveland Ken Lupton Barry Coppinger Joe Michna (Green Party) Sultan Alam Cumbria Richard Rhodes Patrick Leonard Pru Jupe Mary Robinson Derbyshire Simon Spencer Alan Charles David Gale Rod Hutton Devon and Cornwall Tony Hogg Nicky Williams Brian Blake Bob Smith Graham Calderwood Brian Greenslade Ivan Jordan Tam MacPherson William Morris John Smith Dorset Nick King Rachel Rogers Andy Canning Martyn Underhill Durham Nick Varley Ron Hogg Mike Costello Kingsley Smith Dyfed-Powys Christopher Salmon Christine Gwyther Essex Nicholas Alston Val Morris-Cook Andrew Smith Robin Tilbrook (English Democrats) Linda Belgrove Mick Thwaites Gloucestershire Victoria Atkins Rupi Dhanda Alistair
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasters' Liaison Group (BLG) Meeting, 8 February 2005
    Broadcasters’ Liaison Group (BLG) meeting, 8 February 2005 Note of conclusions and action points Present: Paul Chinnery (Five), Emma Jones (S4C), David Jordan (BBC) (chair), Peter Lowe (BSkyB), Ian McBride (ITV), Lisa McLaughlin (BBC Scotland), Prash Naik (Channel 4), Nick Powell (HTV), Ian Pratt (BBC Wales), Rob Shepherd (BBC), Martin Stott (Five), Derrick Thomson (SMG). In attendance: Jane Harris (Electoral Commission), Tabby Karamat (BBC), Jaron Lewis (BBC). Apologies: Eleanor Aitken (BBC Scotland), Andrew Colman (BBC Northern Ireland), Nerys Hopkins (S4C), Rob Morrison (UTV), Huw Roberts (BBC Wales), Nick Toon (Channel 4). Venue: 28 Portland Place, London 1. MEETINGS WITH POLITICAL PARTIES On 11 January 2005 the group had held separate meetings with representatives of the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democratic parties. The group now met representatives of twelve further political parties from Great Britain who were expected to stand sufficient candidates at elections in 2005 to qualify for a PEB. The main purpose of the meeting was to canvas the views of the parties about how PEB slots are allocated during the 2005 elections, and in particular any forthcoming General Election. Meetings were held with the parties in the following order: 1. Scottish National Party (Peter Murrell) 2. UKIP (Mike Nattrass and Nigel Farage) 3. English Democrats (Robin Tilbrook & 2 others) 4. BNP (Richard Barnbrook, Roderick Gordon and Eddie Butler) 5. English and Welsh Greens (Matt Wooton) 6. Scottish Greens (George Baxter) 7. Scottish Socialist Party (Eddie Truman) 8. Respect (Rob Hoveman) 9. Socialist Labour Party (John Hayball) 10. Operation Christian Voice/Christian Democrat Party (Rev Hargreaves) 11. Veritas (Martin Cole and David Soutter) Plaid Cymru had been invited but did not attend.
    [Show full text]
  • After BREXIT Independence for England? - After Brexit-Independence for England P.1 BREXIT Looks Like It Will finally Happen
    Newsletter ISSUE No. 23 January 2020 Inside this Issue After BREXIT Independence for England? - After Brexit-Independence for England p.1 BREXIT looks like it will finally happen. It would Life exists outside London -Election Planning for 2020 even appear that Boris has a plan. The Development of the Northern (could you be a local Government continues to state that they wish Powerhouse or the 'left behind areas to diverge from the EU rules. The EU of England’ is a priority! If you live in candidate for the English continues to say that this failure to adhere to SE England it is easy to assume that Democrats p.2 the various regulations of the EU will rule out a opportunity is spread equally all over -Thoughts on GE2019 by Trade Deal. So the question is: will the England. We need to address the fact Robin Tilbrook p.2 Government just leave the EU on January 31, that Westminster spends too much - Editorial p.2 2020 under WTO rules. It's clear that the Ports time improving the lot of their own -Tale of a Charitable Trust by in France are preparing for something big as bubble. London needs to stop seeing Graham Moore p.3 separate channels are being built to take UK itself as the centre of the UK -Why Charitable Trusts are only traffic. This is much earlier than required if (accounting for a disproportionate fleecing English taxpayers p.3 we were only leaving fully at the end of 2020 amount of Government spending) and -Hurrah for England p.4 (or later if the EU are to be believed).
    [Show full text]
  • A UKIP View of the Brexit Deal
    5TH FEBRUARY 2021 THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE MONTHLY £3.50 A UKIP view of the Brexit deal Neil Hamilton n an article for UKIP N e i l flourish for another five and a half ‘Partnership Council’ made up of UK Hamilton expressed the wishes of years, with Frau von der Leyen and EU representatives. A l o n g s i d e Imany UKIP members when he gloating that the EU has secured this, it has spawned of a raft of wrote his views on the EU Brexit deal “strong tools to incentivise” the UK to specialised committees. The document entitled, ‘This Brexit deal is better than continue allowing their trawlers into is also scattered with reviews after four remaining, but No Deal would have British waters after 2026. years on many aspects of the been best for Britain’. The “bribe” (as ‘Fishing for Leave’ agreement. We must be sure that this “A deal has been deal has been put it) of a £100m funding package is Council cannot abuse the reviews as an agreed and we are finally over the line. nothing more than a consolation effort. opportunity to return us to EU control. I am pleased that we are no longer British fishermen know that they are I had hoped that we’d cut ourselves subservient to the EU after 47 long being shafted out of the billions that free from rule by bureaucrats. years. But, Boris’s deal - though could be made if we opted now to In a spectacular Tory U-turn, Boris obviously a better outcome than reclaim 100% of our fishing grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Background 26-05-2019 - 15:11 Reference No: 20190516BKG51011
    Background 26-05-2019 - 15:11 Reference No: 20190516BKG51011 European elections 2019: country sheets This booklet contains fact sheets with information on electoral rules, poll opening and closing times and candidates for the 2019 European election in EU member states. Press Service, Directorate General for Communication 1 I 80 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume DUCH GUILLOT EN Press switchboard number (32-2) 28 33000 Background Key data and candidates country-by-country Disclaimer: this is informal background information intended to help journalists covering the work of the European Parliament. Press Service, Directorate General for Communication 2 I 80 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume DUCH GUILLOT EN Press switchboard number (32-2) 28 33000 Background Further information Website: European election results European Parliament elections 2019 press tool kit EP press service contacts Contacts EP Press Service Press Service, Directorate General for Communication 3 I 80 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume DUCH GUILLOT EN Press switchboard number (32-2) 28 33000 Background AUSTRIA – REPUBLIK ÖSTERREICH European elections, 23 - 26 May 2019, country sheet: Austria · Official EE19 website https://www.bmi.gv.at/412/Europawahlen/Euro pawahl_2019 · Other elections/referenda held the same day none · Number of MEPs before/after Brexit 18/19 · Current government ÖVP (EPP) & FPÖ (ENF) since October 2017 ELECTORAL RULES · Obligatory vote no · Number of constituencies 1 · Preferential vote yes · Postal vote yes (2014: 5.6 % of votes)
    [Show full text]
  • Options for an English Parliament
    DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OPTIONS FOR AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT MEG RUSSELL AND JACK SHELDON OPTIONS FOR AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT Meg Russell and Jack Sheldon The Constitution Unit University College London March 2018 ISBN: 978-1-903903-80-3 Published by: The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy University College London 29-31 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU United Kingdom Tel: 020 7679 4977 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit © The Constitution Unit, UCL, 2018 This report is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First published March 2018 Front cover image: © Gareth Young, 2010. Contents List of Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... ix Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... x 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Part 1: Context ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Hate 2017 Download
    H PE STATE OF not hate special A HOPE not hate special report into extremism in Britain and Europe today 2017 HATE www.hopenothate.org.uk The year hate went mainstream HOPE not hate challenges organised hate and Become a intolerance within our society. We mobilise communities by providing a positive alternative to the politics of hate. Friend of For as little as £5 a month you can play your part in ensuring that we continue our work to bring communities together in the face of hate. In return for a small monthly donation, you will receive: H PE n Six issues of the HOPE not hate magazine every year n A copy of all HOPE not hate publications not hate n An annual invitation to a private briefing with the HOPE not hate founder and Chief Executive, Nick Lowles n An invitation to an annual HOPE not hate dinner EDDIE IZZARD BEVERLEY KNIGHT MEERA Syal FIONA PHILLIPS SIMON RIMMER LEVI ROOTS Billy BRAGG SPEECH DEBELLE GLENYS KINNOCK JOIN OUR patRONS OF HOPE NOT hatE I want to become a Friend of HOPE not hate Please complete the details on this form below or visit www.hopenothate.org.uk/friend Pay BY StaNDING ORDER Your details Dear Bank Manager, I want to make a monthly gift to HOPE Title not hate of £5.00 or £ _________ each month until further First name notice, starting immediately, please debit the account below. Last name Your bank details Bank name Address Address Postcode Email Postcode Telephone Account no HOPE not hate will not pass on your details to any third party HOPE not hate will occasionally contact you about our campaigns and Sort code supporter information.
    [Show full text]
  • Dated 7Th February 2020
    7TH FEBRUARY 2020 THE REALITY BEHIND EUROPE MONTHLY £3.50 The cost of EU membership e have included the intellectual justification for the figure.] following as a reminder to existence of EEC and later the EU and So let us put that into a naive cash Wall those who wondered the driver for even greater political and figure from the IMF data. why we are leaving the EU. economic union is wholly and entirely UK GDP in 2015 according to the “Many people have questioned the misconceived. That would mean the IMF data was the US dollar equivalent actual cost of EU membership to the whole of Europe has been paying a of US$2.7 trillion. [The IMF figures taxpayers’ of the UK. What follows is heavy price to Brussels and in lost are Gross domestic product based on an attempt to find out! GDP over decades for nothing. It also purchasing-power-parity (PPP)]. This interesting analysis in terms of takes away the rationale for increased UK GDP is projected by the IMF to EU membership, asks how much European social, political, economic rise in 2021 to approaching US$3.4 poorer has the UK become year-on- and military union. Trillion. year in cash terms? And how much There is a better rationale for such For the 2015 figure 13.8% is poorer is the UK today as a union but it is not the one seemingly US$370 Billion extra GDP. consequence of the cumulative effect driving the EU and its foundations are And on the basis of the projection on the nation’s wealth over 46 years of also structurally constitutionally and for 2021, that is an addition to GDP of lower annual growth? What would UK politically inappropriate for such a US$470 Billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Questions in National and EU Courts
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8415, 1 November 2019 Brexit questions in By Vaughne Miller national and EU courts Sylvia de Mars Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Roles of Government and Parliament in the Brexit process 3. The revocability of Article 50 4. UK referendum rules and validity of EU referendum 5. EU procedure infringed EU Treaties? 6. EU citizenship rights: the ‘Amsterdam case’ 7. Extradition to UK using European Arrest Warrant 8. EU trademark protection 9. Future EU-UK relations www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Brexit questions in national and EU courts Contents Summary 4 1. Introduction 6 2. Roles of Government and Parliament in the Brexit process 8 2.1 The Miller case 8 2.2 Elizabeth Webster 9 2.3 Extending Article 50 10 Robin Tilbrook (English Democrats) 10 Barry Legg 12 2.4 Proroguing Parliament 13 Gina Miller 13 Cross-party challenge at Scottish Outer House, Court of Session 13 Supreme Court rules that prorogation was “unlawful” 14 Raymond McCord case 14 3. The revocability of Article 50 16 3.1 What Article 50 says 16 3.2 The Dublin case 17 3.3 Wightman and Others 17 Question for the CJEU 20 UK Government appeals 20 Is primary legislation required to authorise a revocation? 22 The expedited procedure 22 CJEU hearing 22 Advocate General’s Opinion 23 4. UK referendum rules and validity of EU referendum 26 4.1 Harry Shindler 26 CJEU Judgment 27 Appeal is lost 27 4.2 Irregularities in referendum campaigns 27 ‘Good Law Project’ challenge 27 Susan Wilson and Others 30 Marcus Ball v Boris Johnson 31 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2008
    Local Election Results May 2008 Andrew Teale August 15, 2016 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2008 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2012. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License”. This file, together with its LATEX source code, is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations9 I Greater London Authority 11 1 Mayor of London 12 2 Greater London Assembly Constituency Results 13 3 Greater London Assembly List Results 16 II Metropolitan Boroughs 19 4 Greater Manchester 20 4.1 Bolton.................................. 20 4.2 Bury.................................... 21 4.3 Manchester............................... 23 4.4 Oldham................................. 25 4.5 Rochdale................................ 27 4.6 Salford................................. 28 4.7 Stockport................................ 29 4.8 Tameside................................. 31 4.9 Trafford................................. 32 4.10 Wigan.................................. 34 5 Merseyside 36 5.1 Knowsley................................ 36 5.2 Liverpool................................ 37 5.3 Sefton.................................. 39 5.4 St Helens................................. 41 5.5 Wirral.................................. 43 6 South Yorkshire 45 6.1 Barnsley................................ 45 6.2 Doncaster............................... 47 6.3 Rotherham............................... 48 6.4 Sheffield................................ 50 3 4 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2008 7 Tyne and Wear 53 7.1 Gateshead............................... 53 7.2 Newcastle upon Tyne........................
    [Show full text]