DOCSLIB.ORG

Midterm Evaluation of Terai Arc Landscape, Sacred Himalayan Landscape and National Conservation Priority Area, Supported by WWF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Midterm Evaluation of Terai Arc Landscape, Sacred Himalayan Landscape and National Conservation Priority Area, Supported by WWF Midterm Evaluation of Terai Arc Landscape, Sacred Himalayan Landscape and National Conservation Priority Area, Supported by WWF Social Welfare Council, GON, Kathmandu Prof. Narbikram Thapa, Team Leader, PhD (Program Expert) Mr. Pasang Lama - Team member (Officer, SWC) Mr. Subash Parajuli – Team Member (Officer, MoF) Mr. Kishorchandra Gautam – Team Member (Regional Director, E.R, MoFSC) Ms. Madhuri Karki (Thapa) – Team Member (Under Secretary, DoF) Mr. Sher Singh Thagunna – Team Member (Joint Secretary, DNPWC) CA Shankar Thapa - Team Member (Financial Expert) November 2017 Acknowledgement The Terai Arc Landscape (TAL), Sacred Himalayan Landscape (SHL) and National Conservation Priority Area (NCPA) Programs midterm evaluation team is grateful to Social Welfare Council (SWC) to entrusting us to carry out the study. We would like to express sincere gratitude to Mr. Dilli Prasad Bhatta- Member Secretary of SWC, Government of Nepal, Mr. Durga Bhattarai -Deputy Director, Mr. Tilak Dhakal – Co-Manager, TAL-PABZ, Mr. Rai Bahadur Rai-Project Manager - LNPBZSP for the support and cooperation during the midterm evaluation process. We would also like to thank the officials of WWF and partners who were supportive as always tirelessly for good coordination and logistics for the successful completion of the midterm evaluation. The study team would like to express heartfelt thanks to all stakeholders particularly the staff members of Chitwan National Park (CNP), Nepal Army based in CNP, Langtang National Park, and District Agriculture Development Office, Rasuwa, Buffer Zone Forestry Users committees, Buffer Zone Forestry Users groups, civil society organizations, women farmers' groups, agricultural cooperatives, Dairy Cooperatives, community-based organizations, private sector etc. who have made the contributions to make the study enriched. WWF Nepal is acknowledged for the photos presented in the cover page of the midterm evaluation report. Last but not the least; we would like to thank all the respondents without whom this midterm evaluation would not have been possible for sparing their valuable time and providing information to us for the completion of the study. Midterm Evaluation Team Kathmandu, Nepal November, 2017 2 | P a g e Table of Contents Acknowledgement ...................................................................................................................................... 1 List of Figures............................................................................................................................................... 7 List of Boxes ................................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 10 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 17 1.1 Projects Background ......................................................................................................................... 17 1.2 Intended Outcomes of the Programs ............................................................................................. 20 1.3 Intended Beneficiaries of the Project .............................................................................................. 21 1.4 Donor Information ............................................................................................................................ 21 1.5 Project Composition ......................................................................................................................... 21 1.6 Financing Arrangements .................................................................................................................. 22 1.7 Objectives of the midterm evaluation ............................................................................................ 23 1.8 Scope of the midterm evaluation .................................................................................................... 23 1.9 Midterm Evaluation Research Questions ...................................................................................... 24 1.10 Midterm evaluation team composition ........................................................................................ 24 1.11 Organization of the study report .................................................................................................. 25 2. METHODOLOGY OF MIDTERM EVALUATION ........................................................................ 26 2.1 Design of the Study ........................................................................................................................... 26 2.2 Approaches to the Study .................................................................................................................. 26 2.3 Selection of the Participants ............................................................................................................. 26 2.4 Source of Data .................................................................................................................................... 26 2.5 Methods of Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 26 2.5.1 Review of Project Documents .......................................................................................... 26 2.5.2 Semi-structured Interviews ............................................................................................. 27 2.5.3 Focus Group Discussion................................................................................................... 27 2.5.4 Case Studies ....................................................................................................................... 27 2.5.5 Key Informant Interview.................................................................................................. 27 2.5.6 Organizational Assessment ............................................................................................. 27 2.5.7 People's Perception Mapping .......................................................................................... 27 2.5.8 Score Ranking .................................................................................................................... 27 2.5.9 Participant’s Observation ................................................................................................. 28 2.5.10 Before and After Situation Mapping ............................................................................ 28 2.6 Analysis of Data ................................................................................................................................ 28 2.7 Work Schedules of the Study .......................................................................................................... 28 2.8 Limitation of the Study .................................................................................................................... 28 3. MIDTERM EVALUATION FINDINGS ............................................................................................. 30 3.1 Effectiveness and Impact ................................................................................................................. 30 3.1.1 Mood Meter Mapping of Rightholders’ Perception towards the TAL and SHL Programs ..................................................................................................................................... 30 3.1.2 Score ranking of major project activities ........................................................................ 31 3.1.3 Terai Arc Landscape ......................................................................................................... 33 3.1.4 Before and Now Situation Mapping in Amaltari, Nawalparashi .............................. 37 3.2 Sustainability ..................................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.1 Shramik Duna Tapari Small Industry ............................................................................ 41 3.2.2 Institutional Sustainability ............................................................................................... 43 3. 2. 4 Prey-base populations of snow leopards in increasing trend ................................... 48 3.2.5 Baghkhor Sustainable Village Nawalparashi ................................................................ 49 3.2.6 Issues and Challenges....................................................................................................... 51 3.2.7 Impact on Pairebeshi, Rasuwa, Buffer Zone of LNP .................................................... 51 3.2. 8 Technical Sustainability................................................................................................... 53 3.2.3 Financial Sustainability .................................................................................................... 56 3.3 Efficiency ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Rasuwa OSOCC Assessment Cell 10.05.2015
    Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Rasuwa OSOCC Assessment Cell 10.05.2015 This report is produced by the OSOCC Assessment Cell based on secondary data from multiple sources, including the Government of Nepal, UNDAC, United Nations Agencies, non-governmental organisation and media sources. I. Situation Overview Rasuwa is one of the worst affected districts by the 25 April earthquake. As of 8 May, 430 people have been reported killed and 753 injured (MoFA 08/05/2015). Most of those that died in the district were killed in an avalanche that buried inhabtants of Langtang village including tourists in the guesthouses. Some remote areas are yet to be reached or accounted for. More than 63% of the district’s territory is at an elevation of more than 3000 meters. Of the remaining territory, most parts are located at an elevation between 1000 – 3000 meters (University of Copenhagen 2005) and parts of Rasuwa were without road access even before the earthquake, further challenging the relief effort. In the first few days after the earthquake very little information was available from Rasuwa. Field reports have gradually come in that help understand thesituation. Initial estimates based on Government data of damaged buildings in the affected districts, suggests that 82% of the population of Rasuwa have been affected by the earthquake. According to Government data, 8,000 buildings were destroyed in the earthquake. This figure is however unconfirmed and represents a preliminary estimate based on the combination of reports from a range of sources providing information on needs at the VDC level1(Please see map below for an illustration of aggregated number of reported people in need).
    [Show full text]
  • UP Flood Situation Report
    Flood Situation Report Date: 3rd & 4th July 2018 Developed by: PoorvanchalGraminVikasSansthan (PGVS) Flood Situation of Uttarakhand: Flash floods triggered by heavy rain and washed away 16 roads and 10 bridges in Uttarakhand’s Pithoragarh district, currently cutting off access to 41 villages with some 18,000 residents. Flood situation in upstream area, Nepal in Sharda River (Mahakali): Due to effects of this, water in Sharda River and also rain fall in upstream areas of Mahakali (Sharda) River, water level arisen in Parigaon DHM station, Nepal with nearest warning level is 5.34 on 2nd July 2018. Currently the water level of the Mahakali (Sharda) River is 4.452 Miter and trend is falling in Parigaon DHM station, Nepal. Details of the water level from 27 June to till date is given below (Pic 1) (Picture 1) Daily water level of Sharda River from 27 June to 3 July 2018 (Source: Website DHM, Nepal) Flood situation in downstream areas of Uttar Pradesh, India: As per flood bulletin ((3rd July 2108)) of irrigation department, the Sharda River is flowing 0.230 Miter above danger level (153.620 Miter) in Paliyakala, Lakhimpur and currently trend of this river is rising. It’s flowing below danger level 1.420 Miter (135.490 Miter) in Shardanagar. The rainfall 171.4 MM in Banbasa, 118 MM in Paliyakalan ad 100 MM in Shardanagar were also contributed in worsening the situation in last three days. As per Dainik Jagran Newspaper (Page no.3), the Banbasa Barrage had discharged 117000 Qu. water. It will affect Mahsi Areas by today evening.
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATION, AWARENESS and FACING DEVELOPMENT in RASUWA Ariel Murray SIT Study Abroad
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2018 MONEY SPEAKS: EDUCATION, AWARENESS AND FACING DEVELOPMENT IN RASUWA Ariel Murray SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Educational Sociology Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, Place and Environment Commons, Tourism Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Murray, Ariel, "MONEY SPEAKS: EDUCATION, AWARENESS AND FACING DEVELOPMENT IN RASUWA" (2018). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2860. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2860 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONEY SPEAKS: EDUCATION, AWARENESS AND FACING DEVELOPMENT IN RASUWA By Ariel Murray (Fig. 1: three of the six hotels in Nagathali, Thuman Ward 6, Rasuwa) Academic Director: Onians, Isabelle Project Advisor: Dixit, Kunda Sending School: Smith College Major: Government Studies; French Studies Primary Research Location(s): Asia, Nepal, Rasuwa, Thuman, Nagathali, Brenthang Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Nepal: Tibetan and Himalayan Peoples, SIT Study Abroad, Spring 2018 Abstract In the Rasuwa district of Nepal, an area affected profoundly by the 2015 earthquake, development and infrastructure have been fast growing both since the natural disaster and the opening of Rasuwa Gadhi as the more formal trade route to and from China.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Forest Policies, Institutions, and Changes in the Resource Condition in Nepal
    136 International Forestry Review 6(2), 2004 A review of forest policies, institutions, and changes in the resource condition in Nepal A.P. GAUTAM, G.P. SHIVAKOTI and E.L. WEBB School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand Email: [email protected] SUMMARY This paper reviews the evolution of forest policies and forestry institutions in Nepal and tracks the accompanying trends of change in the country’s forest cover over the last century. Our objective is to provide an essential foundation to the policy reform process that is underway in Nepal and many other Asian countries. The review shows that before 1957 the Nepalese government’s focus was on conversion of forestlands to farmlands, and extraction of timber for export. After the nationalisation of the forests in 1957 until 1976, policy-making efforts were oriented towards national control of forests through stringent laws and expansion of the forest bureaucracy. This approach failed as evidenced by widespread deforestation and forest degradation across the country during the 1960s through 1980s. Early efforts of the government and donor agencies to rectify the problem through reforestation and afforestation also largely failed, but these efforts paved the way for subsequent initiation of the participatory approach to forest management in the late 1970s. Since then, community-based forest management evolved continuously under the aegis of supportive forest policies and legislations. The present community forestry program has met with notable successes in some areas. However, the program has been confronted with some contentious issues in recent years including a policy debate over the suitability of forests in the southern lowlands (the terai) for community management and sharing of income obtained from community forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcus Moench and Ajaya Dixit ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES FOR
    ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES FOR RESPONDING TO FLOODS AND DROUGHTS IN SOUTH ASIA Marcus Moench and Ajaya Dixit EDITORS Contributors and their Institutions Sara Ahmed Sanjay Chaturvedi and Eva Saroch Shashikant Chopde and Ajaya Dixit and Dipak Gyawali Independent Consultant Indian Ocean Research Group, Sudhir Sharma Institute for Social and Environmental Chandigarh Winrock International-India Transition-Nepal Madhukar Upadhya and Manohar Singh Rathore Marcus Moench Tariq Rehman and Shiraj A. Wajih Ram Kumar Sharma Institute of Development Srinivas Mudrakartha Institute for Social and Environmental Gorakhpur Environmental Action Nepal Water Conservation Studies, Jaipur VIKSAT, Ahmedabad Transition-International Group, Gorakhpur Foundation, Kathmandu ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES FOR RESPONDING TO FLOODS AND DROUGHTS IN SOUTH ASIA Marcus Moench and Ajaya Dixit EDITORS Contributors and their Institutions Sara Ahmed Sanjay Chaturvedi and Eva Saroch Shashikant Chopde and Ajaya Dixit and Dipak Gyawali Independent Consultant Indian Ocean Research Group, Sudhir Sharma Institute for Social and Environmental Chandigarh Winrock International-India Transition-Nepal Marcus Moench Madhukar Upadhya and Manohar Singh Rathore Institute for Social and Tariq Rehman and Shiraj A. Wajih Ram Kumar Sharma Institute of Development Srinivas Mudrakartha Environmental Transition- Gorakhpur Environmental Action Nepal Water Conservation Studies, Jaipur VIKSAT, Ahmedabad International Group, Gorakhpur Foundation, Kathmandu © Copyright, 2004 Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, International, Boulder Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, Nepal No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form without written permission. This project was supported by the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) and the U.S. State Department through a co-operative agreement with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
    [Show full text]
  • Costs and Benefits of Reducing Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Nepal
    ICIMOD Working Paper 2017/5 Costs and Benefits of Reducing Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Nepal 1 About ICIMOD The International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, ICIMOD, is a regional knowledge development and learning centre serving the eight regional member countries of the Hindu Kush Himalayas – Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal, and Pakistan – and based in Kathmandu, Nepal. Globalisation and climate change have an increasing influence on the stability of fragile mountain ecosystems and the livelihoods of mountain people. ICIMOD aims to assist mountain people to understand these changes, adapt to them, and make the most of new opportunities, while addressing upstream-downstream issues. We support regional transboundary programmes through partnership with regional partner institutions, facilitate the exchange of experience, and serve as a regional knowledge hub. We strengthen networking among regional and global centres of excellence. Overall, we are working to develop an economically and environmentally sound mountain ecosystem to improve the living standards of mountain populations and to sustain vital ecosystem services for the billions of people living downstream – now, and for the future. The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE) is a regional network that brings together analysts from different countries in South Asia to address environment- development problems. SANDEE’s activities include research support, training, and information dissemination. Please see www.sandeeonline.org for further information about SANDEE. SANDEE is financially supported by the International Development Research Center (IDRC), The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the World Bank and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD).
    [Show full text]
  • View and Print the Publication
    Forest Fire Prediction Modeling in the Terai Arc Landscape of the Lesser Himalayas Using the Maximum Entropy Method Amit Kumar Verma and Namitha Nhandadiyil Kaliyathan, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India; Narendra Singh Bisht, Arunachal Pradesh Forest Department, India; and Satinder Dev Sharma and Raman Nautiyal, Indian Council of Forestry Research & Education, Dehradun, India Abstract—The Terai Arc Landscape (TAL) is an ecologically important region of the Indian subcontinent, where anthropogenic habitat loss and forest fragmentation are major issues. The most prominent threat is forest fires because of their impacts on the microhabitat and macrohabitat characteristics and the resulting disruption of ecological processes. Moreover, wildfire aggravates conflicts between humans and wildlife in the forest fringe areas. The lack of a proper forest fire monitoring system in the TAL is a major management issue that needs attention for long-term forest viability. Hence, the present study was undertaken using maximum entropy modeling to predict the areas across the TAL at risk of wildfire and to identify key variables associated with fire occurrence. Spatiotemporally independent fire incidence locations along with other environmental variables were used to build the model. The accuracy of the model was assessed using the area under the curve. To evaluate the importance of each variable, a jackknife procedure was adopted. Areas in the projected map were categorized into high fire, marginal fire, and no fire areas. An adaptive forest management strategy can be implemented in the modeled high fire areas to mitigate forest fire and wildlife conflict in the TAL. Keywords: forest fire, maximum entropy, Terai Arc Landscape, Tiger INTRODUCTION biodiversity (Dennis and Meijaard 2001) because of changes in climate and in human use and misuse of A forest fire, whether caused by natural forces or fire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Context of REDD+ in Nepal Drivers, Agents and Institutions
    OCCASIONAL PAPER The context of REDD+ in Nepal Drivers, agents and institutions Naya S. Paudel Dil B. Khatri Dil Raj Khanal Rahul Karki OCCASIONAL PAPER 81 The context of REDD+ in Nepal Drivers, agents and institutions Naya S. Paudel ForestAction Nepal Dil B. Khatri ForestAction Nepal Dil Raj Khanal Federation of Community Forestry Users, Nepal (FECOFUN) Rahul Karki ForestAction Nepal Occasional Paper 81 © 2013 Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved ISBN 978-602-8693-88-2 Paudel, N.S., Khatri, D.B., Khanal, D.R. and Karki, R. 2013. The context of REDD+ in Nepal: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional Paper 81. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Photo by Keso S./Flickr under Creative Common Nagarkot, Central, Nepal CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the authors’ institutions or the financial sponsors of this publication. Table of contents Abbreviations v About the authors vi Executive summary vii Acknowledgements viii Introduction ix 1 Trends and drivers of deforestation and forest degradation 1 1.1 Land use and forest cover change in Nepal 1 1.2 Factors influencing forest cover change 2 1.3 Monitoring of drivers 6 1.4 Mitigation potential of Nepal’s forest management 6 2 Policies and institutions shaping forest cover change 9 2.1 Forest governance 9 2.2 Decentralisation and benefit-sharing 10 2.3 Forest tenure
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This Strategic Plan Is Prepared for the Terai Arc Landscape (TAL) - Nepal Which Covers Part Or Whole of 14 Terai Districts Viz
    1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This Strategic Plan is prepared for the Terai Arc Landscape (TAL) - Nepal which covers part or whole of 14 Terai districts viz. Kanchanpur, Kailali, Bardia, Banke, Dang, Kapilvastu, Rupandehi, Palpa, Nawalparasi, Chitwan, Makwanpur, Bara, Parsa and Rautahat. The plan is prepared in consultation with different stakeholders for a period of ten years from 2004 to 2014. This section provides a background to the landscape, its people and biodiversity, and the conservation and livelihood approach. The TAL is a vast conservation landscape of approximately 49,500 sq km, stretching from Nepals Bagmati River in the east to Indias Yamuna River in the west (Map 1). It links 11 trans boundary protected areas (Table 1), from Parsa Wildlife Reserve in Nepal to Rajaji National Park in India. Map 1: Terai Arc Landscape Table 1: Protected Areas in TAL Protected Areas Area (km2) NEPAL TERAI ARC LANDSCAPE-NEPAL ARC TERAI Parsa Wildlife Reserve 499 2 Royal Chitwan National Park 932 Royal Bardia National Park 968 Royal Suklaphanta Wildlife Reserve 305 INDIA Valmikinagar Wildlife Sanctuary 336 Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary 551 Dudhwa National Park 490 Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary 227 Corbett National Park 520 Sonanadi Wildlife Sanctuary 798 Rajaji National Park 831 Fed by the watershed of the Churia (Siwalik) Hills that runs east to west, the TAL area in Nepal (TAL - The Nepalese portion of Nepal) is so fertile that it is called the rice bowl of the country. Less than 50 years ago, it was a TAL extends over 23,199 contiguous expanse of dense forests and tall grasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Rasuwa (As of 10 May 2017) HRRP
    District Profile - Rasuwa (as of 10 May 2017) HRRP This district profile outlines the current activities by partner organisations (POs) in post-earthquake recovery and reconstruction. It is based on 4W and secondary data collected from POs on their recent activities pertaining to housing sector. Further, it captures a wide range of planned, ongoing and completed activities within the HRRP framework. For additional information, please refer to the HRRP dashboard. FACTS AND FIGURES Population: 43,3001 18 VDCs Damage Status - Private Structures Type of housing walls Rasuwa National Mud-bonded bricks/stone 87% 41% Cement-bonded bricks/stone 10% 29% Damage Grade (3-5) 12,024 Other 3% 30% Damage Grade (1-2) 620 % of households who own 90% 85% Total 12,6442 their housing unit (Census 2011)1 NEWS & UPDATES 1. Out of 1,406 Grievances listed 1,287 were addressed as eligible for Rasuwa District. NRA Rasuwa already circulated details to all respective rural municipality and ward level offices. 2. Batash Foundation has completed 151 houses to its beneficiaries at Yarsa VDC ward 5. Formalhandover program has not been scheduled yet. 3. 37 HHs from Thulogoun VDCs of Rasuwa district have received third tranche of govern- ment subsid with financial and technical support from Nepal Red Cross society /Build Change. HRRP Rasuwa HRRP © PARTNERS SUMMARY AND HIGHLIGHTS3 Partner Organisation Implementing Partner(s) ACF LACCOS 838 25 DEPROCS SHORT TRAINING GIZ GOAL VOCATIONAL TRAINING 300 901 GOAL UON (Targets Achieved) HELVETAS GMTI,CMES Reached Remaining KF LDF LUMANTI 72 Demonstration Constructions in 10 VDCs LWF MANEKOR,BATAS NAF NRCS OM-N 8 VDCs with Household WASH Assistance PPY SAHAS SP OM-N 9,682 beneficiaries enrolled, 86% 15 partners 4 This table indicates the partner organisations and 9,456 beneficiaries received the 1st Tranche, 84% their respective implementing partner(s) KEY CONTACTS DAO OFFICE DDC OFFICE NRA District Office DUDBC OFFICE Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL Nepal Final 2017
    Page | 1 Project Title: Strengthening anti-poaching measures and tiger monitoring in newly extended area of Parsa National Park Project start date: 1 September 2016 Project End Date: 31 August 2017 Reporting Period: 1 September 2016- 31 August 2017. Report Contributors: Dr Hem Sagar Baral (Project Leader-ZSL) Dr Chiranjivi Prasad Pokheral (NTNC) Dr Bhagawan Raj Dahal (Transboundary Tiger Manager – ZSL) Shashank Poudel (NTNC-Parsa Conservation Programme) Tek Raj Bhatt (Programme Officer- ZSL) Prakash Sigdel (Monitoring and Surveillance Officer - ZSL) Sailendra Raj Giri (Field Biologist - ZSL) 0 Securing the future of Nepal’s tigers Final project report Final Report Submitted to 21st Century Tiger Securing the future of Nepal’s tigers Page | 2 Project Title: Strengthening anti-poaching measures and tiger monitoring in newly extended area of Parsa Wildlife Reserve Project start date: 1 September 2016 Project End Date: 31 August 2017 Reporting Period: 1 September 2016- 31 August 2017. Final Report Submitted to 21st Century Tiger Securing the future of Nepal’s tigers Page | 3 List of Abbreviations CNP Chitwan National Park DNPWC Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation GPS Global Positioning System NTNC National Trust for Nature Conservation PNP Parsa National Park SECR Spatially Explicit Capture Recapture SMART Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool TCL Tiger Conservation Landscape ZSL Zoological Society of London Final Report Submitted to 21st Century Tiger Securing the future of Nepal’s tigers Page | 4 Map 1: Protected areas of Nepal Final Report Submitted to 21st Century Tiger Securing the future of Nepal’s tigers Page | 5 A. Project Background Habitat loss and fragmentation, poaching and the decline of prey species populations are the primary global threats to tigers (Karanth and Gopal, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Impact of the Upper Trishuli-1, 216 Mw Hydropower Project on the Indigenous Communities of Rasuwa
    2017 STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF THE UPPER TRISHULI-1, 216 MW HYDROPOWER PROJECT ON THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF RASUWA LEAD RESEARCHERS SUBHA GHALE & SHRADHA GHALE LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION FOR FIELD SUPPORT HUMAN RIGHTS OF NEPALESE BIBA TAMANG, BOM BAHADUR TAMANG INDIGENOUS PEOPLES BUTI TAMANG, KARSANG TAMANG I Published by Lawyers’ Association for Human Rights of Nepalese Indigenous Peoples (LAHURNIP) Anamnagar, Kathmandu P.O. Box 11179 Contact: +977-01-4268510 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lahurnip.org © LAHURNIP 2017 Printed in Nepal ISBN 978-9937-9135-6-0 Design and Layout Ramesh Maharjan, Utkarsha Design Cover Photo Shradha Ghale STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF THE UPPER TRISHULI-1, 216 MW HYDROPOWER PROJECT ON THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF RASUWA FOREWORD This publication provides an assessment of the impact of the Upper Trishuli-1, 216 MW hydropower project on the indigenous Tamang community of Rasuwa district. The study has succeeded in unveiling the situation of Tamang in the project-affected areas, particularly Haku, Ramche and Dhunche of Rasuwa. International human rights instruments pertaining to indigenous peoples (IPs) provide IPs the right to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) and meaningful participation in development projects carried out in their lands and territories. Similarly, private sector actors are also obliged to respect the human rights of affected communities prior to, during and after the implementation of the project. But both the government and private sector often ignore the presence of IPs in the project site and engage in violation of rights of IPs and local communities in the project area. The Upper Trishuli-1 project is a representative case where provisions of international human rights instruments including the principle of FPIC have been violated.
    [Show full text]