Evolution of the Madrean–Tethyan Disjunctions and the North and South American Amphitropical Disjunctions in Plants 1Jun WEN∗ 2Stefanie M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Journal of Systematics and Evolution 47 (5): 331–348 (2009) doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00054.x Evolution of the Madrean–Tethyan disjunctions and the North and South American amphitropical disjunctions in plants 1Jun WEN∗ 2Stefanie M. ICKERT-BOND 1(Department of Botany, MRC-166, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA) 2(UA Museum of the North Herbarium and Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6960, USA) Abstract The present paper reviews advances in the study of two major intercontinental disjunct biogeographic patterns: (i) between Eurasian and western North American deserts with the Mediterranean climate (the Madrean– Tethyan disjunctions); and (ii) between the temperate regions of North and South America (the amphitropical disjunctions). Both disjunct patterns have multiple times of origin. The amphitropical disjunctions have largely resulted from long-distance dispersal, primarily from the Miocene to the Holocene, with available data indicating that most lineages dispersed from North to South America. Results of recent studies on the Mediterranean disjuncts between the deserts of Eurasia and western North America support the multiple modes of origin and are mostly consistent with hypotheses of long-distance dispersal and the North Atlantic migration. Axelrod’s Madrean–Tethyan hypothesis, which implies vicariance between the two regions in the early Tertiary, has been favored by a few studies. The Beringian migration corridor for semiarid taxa is also supported in some cases. Key words amphitropical disjunctions, biogeography, Madrean–Tethyan disjunctions, Mediterranean disjuncts, North–South American disjunctions. Intercontinental disjunctions have long interested organized these disjunctions according to continent biogeographers (e.g. Gray, 1846; Hooker, 1853; Raven, and latitudinal occurrence, and provided selected dis- 1963, 1972; Darlington, 1965; Thorne, 1972; Raven & tribution maps for each category. The 16 categories Axelrod, 1974; Wen, 1999, 2001; Manos & Donoghue, recognized by Thorne (1972) are: (i) Eurasian–North 2001; Donoghue & Smith, 2004; Sanmart´ın & Ronquist, American disjunctions; (ii) amphi-Pacific tropical dis- 2004; Xiang et al., 2004). Raven (1972) recognized sev- junctions; (iii) pantropical disjunctions; (iv) African– eral major patterns of intercontinental disjunctions as Eurasian (–Pacific) disjunctions; (v) Amphi–Indian follows: (i) in the north temperate zone among east- Ocean disjunctions; (vi) Asian-Pacific disjunctions; ern Asia, Europe/western Asia, eastern North Amer- (vii) Pacific Ocean disjunctions; (viii) Pacific–Indian– ica and western North America (the north temper- Atlantic Oceans disjunctions; (ix) American–African ate disjunctions); (ii) between Eurasian and western disjunctions; (x) North American–South American dis- North American deserts with the Mediterranean climate junctions; (xi) South American–Australasian disjunc- (the Madrean–Tethyan disjunctions); (iii) across south- tions; (xii) temperate South American–Asian disjunc- ern South America, Africa, and Australasia (southern tions; (xiii) circum-south temperate disjunctions; (xiv) Gondwanan disjunctions); (iv) between the Neotrop- circum-Antarctic disjunctions; (xv) subcosmopolitan ics and Africa (transatlantic tropical disjunctions); (v) disjunctions; and (xvi) anomalous disjunctions. Each of between the temperate regions of North and South these 16 major patterns of discontinuous biogeographic America (the amphitropical disjunctions); (vi) between distributions was further subdivided by Thorne (1972), temperate South America and Asia; and (vii) across with the third category (the temperate disjunction) hav- all major regions of the tropics (the pantropical dis- ing as many as 12 subcategories. junctions). Thorne (1972) undertook another review of With advances in molecular phylogenetics and new major disjunctions in plants and recognized 16 cate- tools for estimating divergence times, there is now re- gories with an additional 34 subcategories of biogeo- newed interest in studies of biogeographic disjunctions. graphically discontinuous distributions. Thorne (1972) Many analyses have been conducted on the classical temperate eastern Asian–eastern North American dis- junct pattern. This disjunct pattern has also been ex- amined in a broader framework of northern hemisphere Received: 7 August 2009 Accepted: 26 August 2009 ∗ biogeography (Wen, 1999, 2001; Manos & Donoghue, Author for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-202-633-4881; Fax: +1-202-786-2563. 2001; Donoghue & Smith, 2004). The tropical C 2009 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences 332 Journal of Systematics and Evolution Vol. 47 No. 5 2009 disjunctions in plants have been recently reviewed by stimulate additional work on these two patterns of Givnish and Renner (2004) and a few recent studies have disjunctions. explored the origin and evolution of the amphitropical disjunctions between North and South America (Vargas et al., 1998; Wen et al., 2002; Simpson et al., 2005; 1 Madrean–Tethyan disjunctions Moore et al., 2006). The Madrean–Tethyan disjunc- tion has been examined in several studies, including The Madrean–Tethyan disjunctions in plants were those of Fritsch (1996), Liston (1997), and Hohmann noted by Engler (1879), elaborated by Raven (1971, et al. (2006). Classical biogeographic models, such as 1973) and Thorne (1972), and reviewed by Liston Nothofagus Blume exhibiting a southern hemisphere (1997) from a molecular perspective. This disjunct pat- temperate disjunction and Liquidambar L. exhibiting an tern refers to the discontinuous distribution of con- intercontinental disjunction among eastern Asia, west- generic plants and sometimes conspecific taxa be- ern Asia/southern Europe, and eastern North America tween Mediterranean Eurasia and coastal western of the northern hemisphere, have also been re-examined North America. This pattern is sometimes known as with new analytical methods and new data sources (e.g. the Mediterranean–Californian disjunction (Hohmann Cook & Crisp, 2005; Ickert-Bond & Wen, 2006). et al., 2006) because many western North American el- Our understanding of northern hemisphere bio- ements showing this disjunction are largely distributed geography has progressed steadily in the past 15 years, in California. Five major regions have a Mediterranean- especially with regard to the phylogenetic relationships type climate characterized by hot, dry summers and of disjunct lineages and the timing of major biogeo- cool, moist winters. These regions include the Mediter- graphic patterns (Enghoff, 1995; Wen, 1999; Donoghue ranean basin in southern Europe and western Asia, west- et al., 2001; Sanmart´ın et al., 2001). Several disjunctions ern North America, central Chile, the Cape region of within the northern hemisphere have been better docu- South Africa, and southwestern and southern Australia mented and analyzed, such as the disjunctions between (Raven, 1971). Among these areas, the disjunctions be- eastern Asia–eastern North America (Wen,1999, 2001), tween Mediterranean Eurasia and California have been eastern Asia–western North America (Wu, 1983), the better documented, with approximately 35 plant genera trans-Atlantic disjunction (Manchester, 1999), and east- demonstrating such a disjunct pattern and some also ern North America–western North America (Wen et al., extending their distribution ranges to northern Africa 1996, 1998; Xiang et al. 1998). At present, the topic has (Thorne, 1972). Several are disjunct at the species level been actively investigated by systematists, ecologists, or at the level of species pairs (Stebbins & Day, 1967). and paleobotanists (Wen & Stuessy, 1993; Manchester, Three major hypotheses have been proposed to 1999; Wen, 1999, 2001; Donoghue et al., 2001; Li et al., explain the origin of the Mediterranean Eurasian 2001; Manos & Donoghue, 2001; Sanmart´ın et al., 2001; and western North American disjunction (Figs. 1, 2). Donoghue & Smith, 2004; Qian & Ricklefs, 2004; Xi- Axelrod (1973, 1975) proposed a nearly continuous ang et al., 2004; Yi et al., 2004; Li & Xiang, 2005; Nie trans-Atlantic belt of Madrean–Tethyan broadleaf ev- et al., 2005, 2006a, 2006b; Ickert-Bond & Wen, 2006). ergreen sclerophyllous vegetation stretching from west- These recent studies have demonstrated the complex ern North America to central Asia in the early Ter- history of migration, dispersal, and vicariance in the tiary (from the Eocene to the late Oligocene) at low northern hemisphere, as well as multiple origins of the latitudes (Fig. 1). The disjunct pattern in his view is classical disjunct pattern between eastern Asia and east- ancient and originated from floristic migration across ern North America, and suggested morphological stasis the North Atlantic. Conversely, others (Raven, 1972; among the disjunct lineages in the temperate zone (Wen, Raven & Axelrod, 1975) have argued for the origin 1999, 2001; Ickert-Bond & Wen, 2006). of this disjunct pattern via convergent evolution with The present paper reviews advances in studies of some disjunct taxa resulting from long-distance disper- two major disjunct patterns related to northern hemi- sal. Meusel (1969) also argued for the parallel evolution sphere biogeography, namely the Mediterranean dis- of disjunct taxa in Mediterranean-type climates in both junctions between the deserts of Eurasia and western western North America and western Eurasia. Stebbins North America (or the Madrean–Tethyan
Recommended publications
  • Conservation of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Exploring the Linkages Between Functional and Taxonomic Responses to Anthropogenic N Deposition

    Conservation of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Exploring the Linkages Between Functional and Taxonomic Responses to Anthropogenic N Deposition

    fungal ecology 4 (2011) 174e183 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funeco Conservation of ectomycorrhizal fungi: exploring the linkages between functional and taxonomic responses to anthropogenic N deposition E.A. LILLESKOVa,*, E.A. HOBBIEb, T.R. HORTONc aUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Houghton, MI 49931, USA bComplex Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03833, USA cState University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, 246 Illick Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA article info abstract Article history: Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition alters ectomycorrhizal fungal communities, but the Received 12 April 2010 effect on functional diversity is not clear. In this review we explore whether fungi that Revision received 9 August 2010 respond differently to N deposition also differ in functional traits, including organic N use, Accepted 22 September 2010 hydrophobicity and exploration type (extent and pattern of extraradical hyphae). Corti- Available online 14 January 2011 narius, Tricholoma, Piloderma, and Suillus had the strongest evidence of consistent negative Corresponding editor: Anne Pringle effects of N deposition. Cortinarius, Tricholoma and Piloderma display consistent protein use and produce medium-distance fringe exploration types with hydrophobic mycorrhizas and Keywords: rhizomorphs. Genera that produce long-distance exploration types (mostly Boletales) and Conservation biology contact short-distance exploration types (e.g., Russulaceae, Thelephoraceae, some athe- Ectomycorrhizal fungi lioid genera) vary in sensitivity to N deposition. Members of Bankeraceae have declined in Exploration types Europe but their enzymatic activity and belowground occurrence are largely unknown.
  • Genetic and Genomic Tools to Asssist Sugar Beet Improvement: the Value of the Crop Wild Relatives

    Genetic and Genomic Tools to Asssist Sugar Beet Improvement: the Value of the Crop Wild Relatives

    PERSPECTIVE published: 06 February 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00074 Genetic and Genomic Tools to Asssist Sugar Beet Improvement: The Value of the Crop Wild Relatives Filipa Monteiro 1,2*, Lothar Frese 3, Sílvia Castro 4, Maria C. Duarte 1, Octávio S. Paulo 1, João Loureiro 4 and Maria M. Romeiras 1,2* 1 Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculdade de Ciências Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 2 Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 3 Institute for Breeding Research on Agricultural Crops, Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Quedlinburg, Germany, 4 Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Functional Ecology, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) is one of the most important European crops for both food and sugar production. Crop improvement has been developed to enhance productivity, sugar content or other breeder’s desirable traits. The introgression of traits from Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) has been done essentially for lessening biotic stresses Edited by: constraints, namely using Beta and Patellifolia species which exhibit disease resistance Piergiorgio Stevanato, characteristics. Several studies have addressed crop-to-wild gene flow, yet, for breeding Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy programs genetic variability associated with agronomically important traits remains Reviewed by: Martin Mascher, unexplored regarding abiotic factors. To accomplish such association from phenotype- Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und to-genotype, screening for wild relatives occurring in habitats where selective pressures Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), are in play (i.e., populations in salt marshes for salinity tolerance; populations subjected Germany Chiara Broccanello, to pathogen attacks and likely evolved resistance to pathogens) are the most appropriate Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy streamline to identify causal genetic information.
  • Propagation and Cultivation of Arctostaphylos in Relation to the Environment in Its Natural Habitat 291

    Propagation and Cultivation of Arctostaphylos in Relation to the Environment in Its Natural Habitat 291

    Propagation and Cultivation of Arctostaphylos in Relation to the Environment in its Natural Habitat 291 Propagation and Cultivation of Arctostaphylos in Relation to the Environment in its Natural Habitat in California, U.S.A.© Lucy Hart' School of Horticulture, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB U.K. INTRODUCTION The Mary Helliar Travel Scholarship helped to fund a visit to California to study native plants in their natural habitats and in cultivation. Throughout my study I observed Arctostaphylos, commonly known as manzanita, growing naturally and was able to relate the natural habitats to cultivation conditions in botanic gardens and commercial nurseries where I learnt about the propagation and production of members of the genus. Arctostaphylos is a fundamental genus to California, found almost exclusively in the state, with different species occupying a range of habitats. It is a member of the Ericaceae and is closely related to Arbutus, sharing the same subfamily, Arbutoideae. The generic name is derived from two Greek words — arktos meaning bear and stuphule, a grape. The common name, manzanita (popularly used in California today) is Spanish for "little apple" from the appearance of its berry. There are approximately 60 species, of which several have many subspecies due to frequent hybridisations within the genus (Stuart and Sawyer, 2001). This can make identification difficult in areas where species ranges overlap. Schmidt (1973), a manzanita enthusiast, describes her excitement regarding the future possibilities for more horticultural forms from the natural hybridisations, as a "tantalising prospect." KEY HORTICULTURAL FEATURES The genus includes many forms of evergreen, woody shrubs ranging from low, prostrate, mat-forming types to a few which approach tree size.
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List

    State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List

    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report

    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report

    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
  • Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies Bracteata 12.00 $ 15 1G Abutilon

    Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies Bracteata 12.00 $ 15 1G Abutilon

    REGIONAL PARKS BOTANIC GARDEN, TILDEN REGIONAL PARK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Celebrating 78 years of growing California native plants: 1940-2018 **PRELIMINARY**PLANT SALE LIST **PRELIMINARY** Preliminary Plant Sale List 9/29/2018 visit: www.nativeplants.org for the most up to date plant list, updates are posted until 10/5 FALL PLANT SALE OF CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS SATURDAY, October 6, 2018 PUBLIC SALE: 10:00 AM TO 3:00 PM MEMBERS ONLY SALE: 9:00 AM TO 10:00 AM MEMBERSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRY TO THE SALE AT 8:30 AM Qty Size Name Price 10 1G Abies bracteata $ 12.00 15 1G Abutilon palmeri $ 11.00 1 1G Acer circinatum $ 10.00 3 5G Acer circinatum $ 40.00 8 1G Acer macrophyllum $ 9.00 10 1G Achillea millefolium 'Calistoga' $ 8.00 25 4" Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 5.00 28 1G Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' OUR INTRODUCTION! $ 8.00 6 1G Actea rubra f. neglecta (white fruits) $ 9.00 3 1G Adenostoma fasciculatum $ 10.00 1 4" Adiantum aleuticum $ 10.00 6 1G Adiantum aleuticum $ 13.00 10 4" Adiantum shastense $ 10.00 4 1G Adiantum x tracyi $ 13.00 2 2G Aesculus californica $ 12.00 1 4" Agave shawii var. shawii $ 8.00 1 1G Agave shawii var. shawii $ 15.00 4 1G Allium eurotophilum $ 10.00 3 1G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia $ 8.00 4 1G Amelanchier alnifolia var. semiintegrifolia $ 9.00 8 2" Anemone drummondii var. drummondii $ 4.00 9 1G Anemopsis californica $ 9.00 8 1G Apocynum cannabinum $ 8.00 2 1G Aquilegia eximia $ 8.00 15 4" Aquilegia formosa $ 6.00 11 1G Aquilegia formosa $ 8.00 10 1G Aquilegia formosa 'Nana' $ 8.00 Arabis - see Boechera 5 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata - large inflorescences from Black Diamond $ 11.00 1 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri $ 11.00 15 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' $ 11.00 2 1G Arctostaphylos canescens subsp.
  • Site Assessemnt (PDF)

    Site Assessemnt (PDF)

    Site Assessment Report Scotts Valley Hotel SCOTTS VALLEY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA December 29, 2014 Prepared by: On behalf of: Johnson Marigot Consulting, LLC City Ventures, LLC Cameron Johnson Mr. Jason Bernstein 88 North Hill Drive, Suite C 444 Spear Street, Suite 200 Brisbane, California 94005 San Francisco, California 94105 1 Table Of Contents SECTION 1: Environmental Setting ................................................................................... 4 A. Project Location ........................................................................................................................... 4 B. Surrounding Land Use ................................................................................................................ 4 C. Study Area Topography and Hydrology ............................................................................... 4 D. Study Area Soil .............................................................................................................................. 5 E. Vegetation Types .......................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 2: Methods ............................................................................................................... 7 A. Site Visit .......................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Study Limits ..................................................................................................................................
  • Towards an Updated Checklist of the Libyan Flora

    Towards an Updated Checklist of the Libyan Flora

    Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY) Open access Gawhari, A. M. H., Jury, S. L. and Culham, A. (2018) Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora. Phytotaxa, 338 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1179-3155 doi: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/76559/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Identification Number/DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 <https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1> Publisher: Magnolia Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Phytotaxa 338 (1): 001–016 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.1 Towards an updated checklist of the Libyan flora AHMED M. H. GAWHARI1, 2, STEPHEN L. JURY 2 & ALASTAIR CULHAM 2 1 Botany Department, Cyrenaica Herbarium, Faculty of Sciences, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya E-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Reading Herbarium, The Harborne Building, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Read- ing, RG6 6AS, U.K.
  • Qty Size Name 9 1G Abies Bracteata 5 1G Acer Circinatum 4 5G Acer

    Qty Size Name 9 1G Abies Bracteata 5 1G Acer Circinatum 4 5G Acer

    REGIONAL PARKS BOTANIC GARDEN, TILDEN REGIONAL PARK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Celebrating 77 years of growing California native plants: 1940-2017 **FIRST PRELIMINARY**PLANT SALE LIST **FIRST PRELIMINARY** First Preliminary Plant Sale List 9/29/2017 visit: www.nativeplants.org for the most up to date plant list, updates are posted until 10/6 FALL PLANT SALE OF CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANTS SATURDAY, October 7, 2017 PUBLIC SALE: 10:00 AM TO 3:00 PM MEMBERS ONLY SALE: 9:00 AM TO 10:00 AM MEMBERSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE ENTRY TO THE SALE AT 8:30 AM Qty Size Name 9 1G Abies bracteata 5 1G Acer circinatum 4 5G Acer circinatum 7 4" Achillea millefolium 6 1G Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' 15 4" Achillea millefolium 'Island Pink' 6 1G Actea rubra f. neglecta (white fruits) 15 1G Adiantum aleuticum 30 4" Adiantum capillus-veneris 15 4" Adiantum x tracyi (A. jordanii x A. aleuticum) 5 1G Alnus incana var. tenuifolia 1 1G Alnus rhombifolia 1 1G Ambrosia pumila 13 4" Ambrosia pumila 7 1G Anemopsis californica 6 1G Angelica hendersonii 1 1G Angelica tomentosa 6 1G Apocynum cannabinum 10 1G Aquilegia eximia 11 1G Aquilegia eximia 10 1G Aquilegia formosa 6 1G Aquilegia formosa 1 1G Arctostaphylos andersonii 3 1G Arctostaphylos auriculata 5 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 10 1G Arctostaphylos bakeri 'Louis Edmunds' 5 1G Arctostaphylos catalinae 1 1G Arctostaphylos columbiana x A. uva-ursi 10 1G Arctostaphylos confertiflora 3 1G Arctostaphylos crustacea subsp. subcordata 3 1G Arctostaphylos cruzensis 1 1G Arctostaphylos densiflora 'James West' 10 1G Arctostaphylos edmundsii 'Big Sur' 2 1G Arctostaphylos edmundsii 'Big Sur' 22 1G Arctostaphylos edmundsii var.
  • Saddle Bag Mountain Research Natural Area Guidebook

    Saddle Bag Mountain Research Natural Area Guidebook

    United States Department of Agriculture Saddle Bag Mountain Forest Service Research Natural Area Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report Guidebook Supplement 34 PNW-GTR-731 September 2007 Reid Schuller and Ronald L. Exeter D E E R P A U RT LT MENT OF AGRICU D E E P R A U R LT TMENTOFAGRICU The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
  • Maine Coefficient of Conservatism

    Maine Coefficient of Conservatism

    Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity Conservatism Wetness Abies balsamea balsam fir native 3 0 Abies concolor white fir non‐native 0 Abutilon theophrasti velvetleaf non‐native 0 3 Acalypha rhomboidea common threeseed mercury native 2 3 Acer ginnala Amur maple non‐native 0 Acer negundo boxelder non‐native 0 0 Acer pensylvanicum striped maple native 5 3 Acer platanoides Norway maple non‐native 0 5 Acer pseudoplatanus sycamore maple non‐native 0 Acer rubrum red maple native 2 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple native 6 ‐3 Acer saccharum sugar maple native 5 3 Acer spicatum mountain maple native 6 3 Acer x freemanii red maple x silver maple native 2 0 Achillea millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. borealis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. millefolium common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis common yarrow non‐native 0 3 Achillea ptarmica sneezeweed non‐native 0 3 Acinos arvensis basil thyme non‐native 0 Aconitum napellus Venus' chariot non‐native 0 Acorus americanus sweetflag native 6 ‐5 Acorus calamus calamus native 6 ‐5 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry native 7 5 Actaea racemosa black baneberry non‐native 0 Actaea rubra red baneberry native 7 3 Actinidia arguta tara vine non‐native 0 Adiantum aleuticum Aleutian maidenhair native 9 3 Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair native 8 3 Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine native 7 Aegopodium podagraria bishop's goutweed non‐native 0 0 Coefficient of Coefficient of Scientific Name Common Name Nativity
  • APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report

    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report

    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore EIR BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORE PROJECT CITY OF OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: EnviroApplications, Inc. 2831 Camino del Rio South, Suite 214 San Diego, California 92108 Contact: Megan Hill 619-291-3636 Prepared by: 4629 Cass Street, #192 San Diego, California 92109 Contact: Melissa Busby 858-334-9507 September 29, 2020 Revised March 23, 2021 Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 Proposed Project Location .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Proposed Project Description ............................................................................... 6 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS ............................................ 8 2.1 Background Research .......................................................................................... 8 2.2 General Biological Resources Survey .................................................................. 8 2.3 Jurisdictional Delineation ...................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction .................................................... 9 2.3.2 Regional Water Quality