EVII Ew and Herald
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
R OFF 'C rt 02CA'i CF THE SC, PITH DA,' AL,P171.7 ,:HLI EVII Ew and Herald November 18, 1965 Vol, 142 No. 46 By VIVIAN L. JOHNSON Brunswick, Maine Ingathering is a term peculiar to Seventh- day Adventists, and judging by the adjectives sometimes used with it, it is not always a popular word. Occasionally, even ministers, overburdened by goals, objectives, and multi- tudinous other problems, sigh as they see In- gathering time roll around again. A few church members shrug off the re- sponsibility as belonging to the minister, the church missionary secretary, and a certain few "talented" people who "do it every year." "It's not for me," they say. (To page 8) Ingathering calls for a great variety of talents and offers rich rewards. HE booh of Hebrews differs from the 13 acknowl- edged Epistles of Paul by being written anony- • PART—1 mously. All of Paul's other letters begin with the personal name of the apostle, in Greek as in our Eng- lish versions, and. are generally accepted as being Authored by The Epistle to the Hebrews, however, 'nowhere identifies its author. Moreover, its literary style differs from that of-the other 13 Epistles to such a marked degree that scholars have questioned whether it could have come, from the pen or the mind of Paul. These considerations pose a fascinating problem for Bible students. If Paul did not compose the letter, who did? e/ Whoever wrote it would need an ability and an authority as great as, or greater than, Paul's in order to produce a book of the caliber of Hebrews. In response to this challenge reputable scholars have advanced sug- gestions, each c f which merits study, although none can to tilt be given more than passing mention in our brief survey. A case has been set forth for authorship by.Paurs early, companion Rumbas - (Actti 37;' 1$:1-4); also for Luke ,the evangelist 'and beloved physician (Col. 4:14; 2 Tim. 4:11), for Aquila and Priscilla (Acts 18:1.3), and for Apollos (Acts 18:24-28). Some of these suggestions are attractive, but all are built on slender foundations tbrews and represent little more than attempts to find a candi- date besides Paul, whose claims are indisputably stronger than those for any of his competitors. These claims we shall now examine in some detail. Who wrote this letter, The title given to the book in our Authorized Ver- sion, "The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews," and to whom was it sent? gives no authentic clue to authorship, because such titles were added long after the original letter was written. But since it'reflects persistent tradition that the great apostle was indeed the writer of the letter, it should be given some weight in any search for the authoi, Qf greater value is, the fact that the Eastern branch of the Christian Church, with its centers at Antioch, Caesarea, erusalem, and Alexandria, accepted the Pauline author- ship of the epistle by the middle of the second, century. One of the East's principal leaders, Clement of Alex- andria (bishop of that city from A.D. 190.203), believed the work- was written by Paul in Hebrew and was then sfated into fine-quality Greek by Luke, the gifted thor of the third Gospel and Acts of the Apostles is <way CI ment accounted for the superiority or e; an 4. e•xover that used by Paul in the main corpus .alithe same time associated the one book. To explain the absence of the apostle's name the undisputed letters of Paul. Not only tiv in the Epistle, he suggested that this was deliber- it contain a higher literary level of skillfu ate because of Hebrew prejudice against Paul constructed sentences and extensive vocabulary, for having spent so much of his life ministering approached in the New Testament only, by to the heathen; also because the apostle to the Luke's Acts of the Apostles, but there is an Gentiles had no desire to pose also as the apostle orderly succession of thought and a serenity of to the Hebrews, seeing that his Lord had been argument that seems far removed from the glow- sent to the chosen people. ing indignations and fervent personal appeals Another prominent church father, Origen (c. of the Corinthian and Galatian Epistles. 185-254), rejected the suggestion that the book Yet, at the same time, are we not compelled is a translation from Hebrew, since so many of to ask whether the man who produced the closely its literary qualities are inherently Greek rather woven reasonings of. Romans and the soaring than Hebrew, and because the bulk of its Old insights of Ephesians was not also capable of Testament references are drawn from the Sep- depicting the sublimities of Christ's celestial tuagint rather than from the Hebrew original. ministry? Who would deny Paul's ability o At the same time, since he regarded the thoughts create the substance of the Epistle to the as distinctly Pauline, he proposed that an ac- Hebrews, especially if the actual writing of the complished writer, such as Luke or Clement of letter be credited to a calmer literary mind than Rome, had recorded from memory the sub- Paul's? stance of the apostle's teachings on the priest- Furthermore, the thought within the Epistle hood of Christ. is genuinely Pauline. The man who wrote In the West support for the Pauline origin of Colossians 1:12-22, 1 Thessalonians 5:23, and Hebrews came more slowly. The book's ano- 2 Thessalonians 2:16, 17 would have little dif- nymity automatically made it an object of sus- ficulty in conceiving Hebrews 1:1-3 and 13:20, 21. picion, and it was not even included-Wthe early We agree with the many commentators, from list of inspired writings as recorded** the Mura- Origen onward, who have seen the thought con- torian Fragment (c. 190). The'Litin church tent and the theological concepts of the beauti father, Tertullian (c. A.D. 160-230), took it to fully written letter as being essentially Paul's. be the work of Barnabas, and it was .not until Further, we derive, support for Pauline author the church councils in the fourth century; be- ship from Ellen. G. White's repeated ascription ginning with Laodicea in A.D. 164, that th West of the Epistle to Paul (see, for example, The followed the East in accepting the Epistle as Great Controversy, pages 347, 411413, and coming from Paul. Patriarchs and Prophets, page 357). We shall Subsequently, Jerome (c. 340-420) adopted therefore'accept the great apostle as the auth the theory that a Hebrew original had been of the letter to the Hebrews. eloquently rewritten in Greek, while Augustine Another problem, scarcely less interesting or of Hippo (354.430) counted the book as one of important than that of authorship, resides to t Paul's "fourteen" Epistles. Thereafter the work question To whom was the letter ad was uncritically ascribed to Paul until the Ren- The only authentic title to the Epistle "eon aissance when some sixteenth-century scholars of two Greek words, Pros Hebraious, meaning reopened the topic of the book's authorship and "To the Hebrews." This address is capable of decided against the claims of Paul. Many critics several interpretations. It could imply that the have, followed their example until it would ap- message was sent to the whole body of HebreW, pear that most present-day commentators leave Christians; but the many personal touches (see no stone unturned to discredit the possibility that chs. 2:3; 13:6, 19, 23, 24) render this untenable. Paul wrote the Epistle. It could refer to the Jewish Christian church in It must be acknowledged that even a cursory erusalem, but it is difficult to imagine the reading of a few of Hebrews' 13 chapters reveals author's writing about the sanctuary to believers that the style is radically different from that of there without mentioning the Temple in. 401 midst; neither would it be likely that 5:12). The congregation could look Chester Beatty Papyri of the third none of them had personally known back on "the former days" when it century include Hebrews between Jesus, as the writer implies in chap- was persecuted (ch. 10:32-34), and it Romans and 1 Corinthians, thereby ter 2:3. possessed a well-developed order of mutely testifying not only to its can- It is more probable that the Epistle officers (ch. 13:7, 17). These points onicity but to its Pauline authorship. was addressed to Christians of Jewish would suggest a fairly advanced posi- We may safely conclude, therefore, origin in one of the great metropolises tion in the apostolic era as the earliest that while the book's anonymity de- of the ancient world—Antioch, Alex- date for its writing. layed its acceptance into the canon of andria, or Rome. Wherever it was, A reasonable terminal date can be inspired Scriptures, its intrinsic qual- the author had already visited those fixed by observing that although the ity led many sections of the church to to whom he was writing, so had per- letter deals thoroughly with the topic treasure and use it from early apos- sonal knowledge of them (ch. 13:19). of the sanctuary and its ordinances, it tolic times. The preponderance of scholarly opin- makes no mention of the destruction This appreciation of the book is ion favors Rome as the letter's desti- of the Jerusalem Temple in A.D.