DOCSLIB.ORG

Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Contents Introduction 3 Key findings 4 Building permits and application analysis 6 Unutilised building permits 8 Revitalisation is the important trend in Warsaw 9 The race for height 10 Warsaw’s Office Market 12 Śródmieście: Is a central location the future? 13 Wola on the rise 15 Construction numbers are decreasing in Mokotów 17 No new building permits in Ochota 19 Office stock in Włochy 20 Revitalised schemes are dominant in Praga office stock 21 Non-business districts 22 What will Warsaw of the future look like? 23 Methodology 25 Contacts 26 2 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Introduction Welcome to the second edition of the Deloitte Warsaw Crane Survey. The Warsaw office market has reached maturity after three decades of spectacular development. Since 1990, when the supply was very limited following the fall of communism, now the stock of modern office space has grown to more than 5.6m sqm. However, in the two editions of our What? survey, one of the most interesting findings has been the decreasing number of building permits issued for office developments. Is this a sign The Crane Survey measures the volume of office development in Warsaw. We have analysed all of an approaching slowdown? Has the impact of COVID-19 affected the number of projects underway and the volume of construction work on building permits for schemes with a GLA over office projects in Warsaw? 2,500 sqm issued in the last eleven years. The Deloitte Warsaw Office Crane Survey 2021 We have also looked at other administrative decisions. How? is a barometer of business activity in Poland’s capital, These include WZ decisions, defining the conditions We have taken a street-level view of Warsaw in which we examine Warsaw’s current office stock and under which a development may be launched. Although to monitor all office construction underway, future potential supply. As current stock is easy to track 60% of the city is not yet covered by local plans, we can verifying our observations with data from the using abundant market data we decided in the first take into account most of Warsaw’s land area by looking Architecture & Planning Department of Warsaw edition to focus on future as well as current office stock. at WZ decisions. This allows us to investigate future City Administration and our in-house real estate The Crane Survey is unique in analysing the modern office projects in most of the city. experts. stock in all Warsaw’s districts with a special focus on building permits and administrative decisions. Through The two building permits issued for large schemes When? a collaboration with the City of Warsaw, we have also confirm the trend seen in the last few years: that The survey covers the last 11 years (2010-2020). analysed the building permits issued during the last developers are building larger and higher schemes. We 11 years, giving us a complete overview of the trends can see more revitalisation and mixed-use projects. influencing developer activities. Where? We hope you find this report a valuable tool for Dominik Stojek The report covers all districts within Warsaw’s The Crane Survey measures the volume of office understanding the Warsaw office market. Partner Associate city administrative boundaries. development in Warsaw. We have analysed the building Real Estate Advisory permits issued during the last decade for schemes with Who? a gross leasable area (GLA) of more than 2,500 sqm. The report is addressed to all real estate market players, including developers, investment funds, advisors, investors, financial and administrative institutions. 3 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Key findings • The 2020 data confirms that the pandemic has • After record-breaking 2016, when around 400,000 sqm • The low occupancy rate across several new projects, strengthened the existing slowdown in Warsaw’s of new stock was delivered, the market saw three combined with the second-highest amount of office market for new office projects. In the previous edition of consecutive years of decline in the delivery of modern stock to come to market in a single year (after the the Warsaw Crane Survey, we reported that 17 building office stock. In 2020 at more than 300,000 sqm, we record-breaking 2016), is likely to reduce future planned 2 permits for office and service projects were issued saw the the second-highest amount of new office supply. new building permits for office projects in 2020 in 2019, 7 of which were for modern office stock. In stock delivered to the Warsaw market in a single year. • The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced tenants’ (7 in 2019) 2020, only two such building permits were issued: the Furthermore, according to construction schedules, decisions to postpone or halt much planned expansion Skanska project located at Łucka Street (former the new stock planned for 2021 will exceed last year’s and many new lease agreements. This may stretch yet Impexmetal), next to Art.Norblin; and The Bridge results. further the gap between net demand and the new stock 0 new applications for office building permits filled of Ghelamco, located next to Warsaw Spire scheme. • While the average vacancy rate across Warsaw is to be delivered this year. in 2020 There is a significant discrepancy between numbers of around 10%, several office schemes that either opened issued building permits (2 vs. 7 in 2019), however the in recent months or will be delivered in 2021 have difference in GLA is only 10% lower. This confirms our relatively high vacancy rates of more than 40%. ca. 62,000 conclusions from the last report - we are building fewer estimated GLA of building permits for office but larger projects. projects issued in 2020 (-27% y/y) Correlation of building permits and projects commissioning Number of building permits and planned GLA for modern office buildings 100% 700 000 700 000 45 of building permits issued in 2020 are located in 40 Wola district 600 000 600 000 35 500 000 500 000 30 over 300,000 ) 400 000 ) 400 000 25 stock delivered to the market in 2020 300 000 300 000 20 GLA (sqm GLA (sqm 15 over 380,000 200 000 200 000 10 stock forecasted to be delivered to the market 100 000 in 2021 100 000 5 0 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 over 5.6m total modern office stock in Warsaw GLA of issued building permits GLA of commissioned projects GLA Number of buildings 4 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Average period between obtaining building permit and building commissioning Building permits obtained by developers in terms of GLA 5 The most building permits in the last 11 years were issued for Wola district (47) with a total 17% 4 Ghelamco leasable area of 1.1 million sqm HB Reavis 3 Skanska 12% 16 building permits, issued before 2016, where 2 Echo Investment construction works still did not start 50% PHN 1 9% Karimpol 27 office projects with a building permit, at the inne 0 planning or construction stage (as of 31/12/2020) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 5% 3% 4% On-going investment processes (considering time from obtaining building permit and commisioning of a building) Warsaw’s Top 6 GLA of building permits obtained by developers in the last 11 years 1 500 000 100 GLA (sqm) Number of projects Ghelamco 449 000 13 80 1 000 000 HB Reavis 290 000 7 60 Skanska 226 000 12 40 500 000 Echo Investment 135 000 7 20 PHN 91 000 3 0 0 Karimpol 70 000 2 2010 20112012 2013 2014 20152016 2017 20182019 2020 GLA Number 5 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Building permits and application analysis Building permits analysis indicators including applications for building permits and According to the market and report methodology, only development conditions (hereinafter referred to as WZ two building permits for modern office developments decision). were issued in 2020. The first of these was for the Skanska 40% project located at Łucka Street (formerly Impexmetal - At least five applications for WZ decisions appeared in The area covered by local plans in Warsaw. ca. 15,000 sqm), next to the Art.Norblin scheme. 2020 for office projects or mixed-use developments WZ decisions apply in 60% of the Warsaw area. including an office element. Developers are currently 26% of plans are under preparation. The second permit, issued in mid-December 2020, was preparing new projects, which will be realised once the for The Bridge (ca. 47,000 sqm), the new office project of current market slowdown is over. However, none of Ghelamco, formerly known as Bellona Tower. applications for building permits we saw were for new Intraco Prime office schemes. This may indicate a longer slowdown for Drucianka During analysis we did not notice any new application for construction in the years ahead. Plac Grzybowski a building permit. The Bridge There are signs of a shift of focus in older projects, away Development conditions from offices to other uses such as residential or hotel. Łucka 5/7 Dobra To help us predict future construction trends, as well as the building permits issued we looked at other Lixa (next phase) Towarowa 22 Złota 58/64 Dor Plaza Building permits by year for buildings commissioned in 2020 P180 9 8 7 6 5 Equinix 4 3 Construction started 2 Issued building permits 1 Issued WZ Decisions 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Application of WZ Decision 6 Warsaw Crane Survey 2021 Building permits replaced by residential function Office function replaced by residential Construction work has not started on the Libero Tower During our analysis of the Crane Survey’s findings, we saw Echo Investment is planning to develop a primarily (Burakowska St.), although a permit has been issued.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyright © London Branch of the Polish Home Army Ex-Servicemen Association Copying Permitted with Reference to Source and Authors
    Copyright © London Branch of the Polish Home Army Ex-Servicemen Association Copying permitted with reference to source and authors www.polishresistance-ak.org Article 4 Dr Tadeusz Kondracki, The Warsaw Uprising The Red Army entered Poland in January 1944, in pursuit of the Germans. The Soviets refused to recognise the legitimate Polish authorities loyal to the Polish Government-in-Exile based in London. Thus, as they progressed, they disarmed the Home Army (AK) detachments they met along the way which remained loyal to their government. This persuaded the Polish authorities to return to a concept that had been shelved earlier, of staging an uprising in the capital – Warsaw. The Commander-in-Chief of the Home Army, General Tadeusz Komorowski (pseudonym “Bór”) was to explain later: “Fighting everywhere, we could not remain passive on our own land… The nation that wants to live in freedom cannot be passive at moments when its fate is being decided.” On July 26, 1944, the Polish Government-in-Exile authorized General Bór-Komorowski and its Home Delegate – J S Jankowski, to commence armed action with the aim of liberating Warsaw. Soviet radio-stations were also calling for an uprising. With news of the Soviet forces approaching the city, on July 31, 1944, General Bór-Komorowski gave the order to rise up. This order was given to Colonel Antoni Chrusciel (pseudonym: “Monter’) who issued an order setting the time of the uprising to commence at 17.00 hours on August 1, 1944. The Home Army forces of the Warsaw District numbered about 50,000 soldiers of whom 23,000 were combat-ready.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Current Situation of Post-Industrial Sites in Urban Areas of Three Functional Zones: Capital City of Warsaw
    D.T1.1.4-5-6 Analysis of the current situation of post-industrial sites in urban areas of three functional zones: Capital City of Warsaw, the City of Plock and the City of Radom together with the city of Pionki Version 1 Subtitle 12 2016 Authors: Institute of Urban Development Aleksandra Jadach-Sepioło, Ph.D. Dominika Muszyńska-Jeleszyńska, Ph.D. Katarzyna Spadło, M.Sc. 2 Index Subtitle ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Version 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 1 12 2016 ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. GENERAL BACKGROUND AND LOCATION OF THE POST-INDUSTRIAL SITES ................................... 3 2. DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED DEGRADED AREAS ................................................................ 21 2.1. Historic background ................................................................................................................... 21 Source: zbiory własne autora. ............................................................................................................... 35 2.2. Environmental issues and critical aspects .................................................................................. 36 2.2.1 Air quaility ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rozkład Jazdy I Mapa Linii Dla: Kolej R1
    Rozkład jazdy i mapa linii dla: kolej R1 R1 Warszawa — Skierniewice Wyświetl Wersję Na Przeglądarkę kolej R1, linia (Warszawa — Skierniewice), posiada 5 tras. W dni robocze kursuje: (1) Grodzisk Maz.: 00:25 - 21:51 (2) Skierniewice: 03:51 - 23:25 (3) Warszawa Wschodnia: 03:40 - 22:35 (4) Żyrardów: 04:03 - 17:51 Skorzystaj z aplikacji Moovit, aby znaleźć najbliższy przystanek oraz czas przyjazdu najbliższego środka transportu dla: kolej R1. Kierunek: Grodzisk Maz. Rozkład jazdy dla: kolej R1 48 przystanków Rozkład jazdy dla Grodzisk Maz. WYŚWIETL ROZKŁAD JAZDY LINII poniedziałek 00:25 - 21:51 wtorek 00:25 - 21:51 Dęblin 6 Dworcowa, Dęblin środa 00:25 - 21:51 Rokitnia Stara czwartek 00:25 - 21:51 Życzyn piątek 00:25 - 21:51 sobota 00:25 - 19:51 Mika niedziela 00:25 - 19:51 Wygoda Grabniak Sobolew Informacja o: kolej R1 Kierunek: Grodzisk Maz. Leokadia Przystanki: 48 Długość trwania przejazdu: 49 min Podsumowanie linii: Dęblin, Rokitnia Stara, Życzyn, Łaskarzew Przystanek Mika, Wygoda, Grabniak, Sobolew, Leokadia, 91 Warszawska, Poland Łaskarzew Przystanek, Wola Rowska, Ruda Wola Rowska Talubska, Garwolin, Pilawa, Augustówka, Zabieżki, Chrosna, Kołbiel, Celestynów, Stara Wieś, Pogorzel Warszawska, Śródborów, Otwock, Świder, Józefów, Ruda Talubska Michalin, Warszawa Falenica, Warszawa Miedzeszyn, Warszawa Radość, Warszawa Garwolin Międzylesie, Warszawa Anin, Warszawa Wawer, 35 Ogrodowa, Wola Rębkowska Warszawa Gocławek, Warszawa Olszynka Grochowska, Warszawa Wschodnia, Warszawa Pilawa Stadion, Warszawa Powiśle, Warszawa Śródmieście, Warszawa
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw in Short
    WarsaW TourisT informaTion ph. (+48 22) 94 31, 474 11 42 Tourist information offices: Museums royal route 39 Krakowskie PrzedmieÊcie Street Warsaw Central railway station Shops 54 Jerozolimskie Avenue – Main Hall Warsaw frederic Chopin airport Events 1 ˚wirki i Wigury Street – Arrival Hall Terminal 2 old Town market square Hotels 19, 21/21a Old Town Market Square (opening previewed for the second half of 2008) Praga District Restaurants 30 Okrzei Street Warsaw Editor: Tourist Routes Warsaw Tourist Office Translation: English Language Consultancy Zygmunt Nowak-Soliƒski Practical Information Cartographic Design: Tomasz Nowacki, Warsaw Uniwersity Cartographic Cathedral Photos: archives of Warsaw Tourist Office, Promotion Department of the City of Warsaw, Warsaw museums, W. Hansen, W. Kryƒski, A. Ksià˝ek, K. Naperty, W. Panów, Z. Panów, A. Witkowska, A. Czarnecka, P. Czernecki, P. Dudek, E. Gampel, P. Jab∏oƒski, K. Janiak, Warsaw A. Karpowicz, P. Multan, B. Skierkowski, P. Szaniawski Edition XVI, Warszawa, August 2008 Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport Free copy 1. ˚wirki i Wigury St., 00-906 Warszawa Airport Information, ph. (+48 22) 650 42 20 isBn: 83-89403-03-X www.lotnisko-chopina.pl, www.chopin-airport.pl Contents TourisT informaTion 2 PraCTiCal informaTion 4 fall in love wiTh warsaw 18 warsaw’s hisTory 21 rouTe no 1: 24 The Royal Route: Krakowskie PrzedmieÊcie Street – Nowy Âwiat Street – Royal ¸azienki modern warsaw 65 Park-Palace Complex – Wilanów Park-Palace Complex warsaw neighborhood 66 rouTe no 2: 36 CulTural AttraCTions 74 The Old
    [Show full text]
  • Acta 114.Indd
    Acta Poloniae Historica 114, 2016 PL ISSN 0001–6829 Aleksander Łupienko Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences MILITARY ASPECTS IN THE SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT OF POLISH CITIES IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY* Abstract Military issues were deemed vital in the European politics of the nineteenth century. The aim of this article is to trace the most important implications of the ‘military bias’ of state authorities in the border region between the three empires (Germany, Russia and Austria – later the Austro-Hungarian Empire) which occupied the Central and Eastern part of the continent. Military authorities sometimes exercised a particularly strong infl uence upon urban policy. The two major issues addressed in this article are the fortifi cations (their creation, strengthening, and spatial development) which infl uenced urban sprawl – though perhaps not so much as is maintained in the scholarly literature – and the development of railways. The directions and tracks chosen for the railways were also infl uenced by the military plans, which in turn often differed much from the visions of the urban offi cials who made up the administration of the city. Keywords: urban development, nineteenth-century cities, Polish territories, forti- fi cations, railroads In 1898 a great Polish-Jewish entrepreneur, whose wealth came mainly from railroad investments, published in Petersburg a six-volume work Budushchaya Voĭna, translated into many languages (in English it was published under the title: Is War Now Impossible?1). In this work he * The paper is a result of research into the functioning of urban architecture in the Polish territories (1850–1914). The project is fi nanced from the means of the National Science Centre (decision no.
    [Show full text]
  • Europan 15 Warsaw
    EUROPAN 15 WARSAW Dęby Młocińskie - local nature conservation site The Huta ArcelorMittal Warszawa steelplant Warszawa The HutaArcelorMittal 2 Młociny neighbourhood industrial spur Skłodowskiej-Curie bridge Smelting Shop Ventilation shaft The “Galeria Młociny” Shopping Centre rolling mill Wierzbno neighbourhood Metro Młociny Metro Młociny city centre steel plant gas pipeline former rolling mill Wawrzyszew neighbourhood areas after demolition electrical substation former finishing house warehouse air-separation plant Project site Project shelterbelt trees 3 landfill Table of contents Introduction 5 Description of the immediate surroundings 24 Warsaw 6 Northern Municipal Graveyard in Warsaw 24 Nature and climate 7 Wrzeciono estate 25 Industrial and brownfield sites in Warsaw 8 Wawrzyszew and Wolumen 25 Strategic site 10 Placówka 26 Natural context 10 Młociny Estate 26 Huta Warszawa 11 “Galeria Młociny” Shopping Centre 27 Timeline 14 Project area 28 Air pollution 18 Zone B 28 Land and subsoil water pollution 18 Zone C 29 Noise 18 Project guidelines 28 Architecture and urban planning in Huta 18 Strategic site area 30 Art and monuments in Huta 20 Project area 30 Traffic conditions 22 Railway line 22 Metro Młociny hub 23 R-4 “Żoliborz” tram depot 23 4 Introduction Once located in the distant outskirts of Warsaw, The competition aims to select the best proposals the area of former Huta Warszawa (Warsaw for the integration of the strategic site with the rest Steelworks) has become a quality location for housing of the city, and the best vision of a flexible, multifunctional, projects, as the city continues to develop and expand. open and harmonious spatial structure that engages The continued operation of the steelworks, coupled in dialogue with its urban and social contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafał Rudziński President of the Board of Robert Bosch and Representative of Bosch Group in Poland
    1/2020 Executivewww.executive-club.com.pl MAGAZINE SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY SUMMIT Report from the 5th edition of the conference REAL ESTATE FOCUS Interview with Ronan Vaspart, Director of MIPIM RAFAŁ RUDZIŃSKI PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF ROBERT BOSCH AND REPRESENTATIVE OF BOSCH GROUP IN POLAND Drodzy Czytelnicy Witamy w pierwszej edycji kwartalnika wydawanego przez Executive Club. Z nowym rokiem odświeżyliśmy formułę magazynu. Zmieniła się szata graficzna i tytuł, co naszym zdaniem lepiej podkreśla charakter magazynu. Wierzymy, że ta zmiana przypadnie Państwu do gustu. Wydanie, które mają Państwo w rękach, jest wyjątkowe z jeszcze jednego powodu. Jako Executive Club zostaliśmy partnerem medialnym MIPIM 2020 – największego na świecie wydarzenia poświęconego nieruchomościom i inwestycjom, które odbywa się w połowie marca w Cannes. W związku z tym przygotowaliśmy dedykowany dział o nazwie „Real Estate Focus”. Znajdą w nim Państwo wiele inspiracji i trendów dotyczących szeroko pojętego rynku nieruchomości. Jednym z ekspertów w tej sekcji jest Ronan Vaspart, dyrektor MIPIM, z którym udało się nam porozmawiać o tematyce tegorocznego wydarzenia i tajemnicach organizowania tak dużych wydarzeń, jak MIPIM. Wywiady z czołowymi polskimi i zagranicznymi przedsiębiorcami są nieodłącz- nym elementem naszego magazynu. Wśród nich znajdą Państwo również wywiad z Panem Rafałem Rudzińskim, Prezesem Zarządu Robert Bosch i Przedstawicie- lem Grupy Bosch w Polsce, który zgodził się gościć na okładce tego wydania. Rozmawialiśmy m.in. o działaniach firmy Bosch w obszarach zrównoważonego i odpowiedzialnego biznesu oraz o wyzwaniach, przed jakimi stoi branża. „Okiem eksperta” i „Relacje” to dwie ostatnie sekcje naszego magazynu. W pierw- szej z nich wybrani eksperci omawiają najbardziej aktualne zagadnienia z perspektywy przedsiębiorstwa, takie jak: proptech, transformacja cyfrowa i oddziaływanie firm na środowisko.
    [Show full text]
  • Wykaz Identyfikatorów I Nazw Jednostek Podziału Terytorialnego Kraju” Zawiera Jednostki Tego Podziału Określone W: − Ustawie Z Dnia 24 Lipca 1998 R
    ZAK£AD WYDAWNICTW STATYSTYCZNYCH, 00-925 WARSZAWA, AL. NIEPODLEG£0ŒCI 208 Informacje w sprawach sprzeda¿y publikacji – tel.: (0 22) 608 32 10, 608 38 10 PRZEDMOWA Niniejsza publikacja „Wykaz identyfikatorów i nazw jednostek podziału terytorialnego kraju” zawiera jednostki tego podziału określone w: − ustawie z dnia 24 lipca 1998 r. o wprowadzeniu zasadniczego trójstopniowego podziału terytorialnego państwa (Dz. U. Nr 96, poz. 603 i Nr 104, poz. 656), − rozporządzeniu Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 sierpnia 1998 r. w sprawie utworzenia powiatów (Dz. U. Nr 103, poz. 652) zaktualizowane na dzień 1 stycznia 2010 r. Aktualizacja ta uwzględnia zmiany w podziale teryto- rialnym kraju dokonane na podstawie rozporządzeń Rady Ministrów w okresie od 02.01.1999 r. do 01.01.2010 r. W „Wykazie...”, jako odrębne pozycje wchodzące w skład jednostek zasadniczego podziału terytorialnego kraju ujęto dzielnice m. st. Warszawy oraz delegatury (dawne dzielnice) miast: Kraków, Łódź, Poznań i Wrocław a także miasta i obszary wiejskie wchodzące w skład gmin miejsko-wiejskich. Zamieszczone w wykazie identyfikatory jednostek podziału terytorialnego zostały okre- ślone w: − załączniku nr 1 do rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 15 grudnia 1998 r. w sprawie szczegółowych zasad prowadzenia, stosowania i udostępniania krajowego rejestru urzędo- wego podziału terytorialnego kraju oraz związanych z tym obowiązków organów admini- stracji rządowej i jednostek samorządu terytorialnego, obowiązującego od dnia 1 stycz- nia 1999 r. (Dz. U. z 1998 r. Nr 157, poz. 1031), − kolejnych rozporządzeniach Rady Ministrów zmieniających powyższe rozporządzenie w zakresie załącznika nr 1 (Dz. U. z 2000 Nr 13, poz. 161, z 2001 r. Nr 12, poz. 100 i Nr 157, poz.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Evaluer Index 2020 English
    2020 EVALUER INDEX ANALYSIS OF TRANSACTION PRICES AND FORECASTS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL MARKET IN POLAND PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MARKET Table of content INTRODUCTION ANALYSIS OF THE RESIDENTIAL MARKET IN 2019 page 3 page 4 RESIDENTIAL WARSAW page 8 CRACOW page 12 MARKET WROCLAW page 14 IN POLAND POZNAN page 16 TRI-CITY page 18 LODZ page 20 KATOWICE AND THE SILESIAN AGGLOMERATION page 22 page 6 REGIONAL CITIES page 24 ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING COSTS PERMITS ISSUED OF DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS page 26 page 27 FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2020 OF EMMERSON EVALUATION AND EVALUER ACTIVITIES page 28 page 29 2 Introduction Dear Readers, We are pleased to present to you the seventh edition of the Evaluer Index report on the residential market in Poland. This year, as in previous years, we focused on the markets of the largest Polish cities. We have analyzed price changes that have occurred over the past year in over 30 locations. We have described in detail the markets of the 7 major agglomerations: Warsaw, Cracow, Wroclaw, Poznan, Tricity, Lodz, Katowice and the Silesian Agglomeration, as well as selected regional cities. The results of our analysis clearly show that 2019 was another re- cord year in terms of housing price increases. At present, the COVID-19 pandemic has put an end to several years of boom on the housing market, which still continued in the first two months of this year. Apart from the tra- ditional analysis of last year’s indicators and current trends, we decided to look at the previous editions of the Evaluer Index, which we have been pub- lishing since 2014 and summarize 6 years of very good market conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • NSB Core the Impact of the E75 Railway Line Modernisation on the Development of the Warsaw Metropolitan Area
    NSB CoRe The impact of the E75 railway line modernisation on the development of the Warsaw Metropolitan Area Case study The impact of the E75 railway line modernisation on the development of the Warsaw Metropolitan Area Project North Sea Baltic Corridor of Regions (NSB CoRe) Prepared by: Mazovian Office for Regional Planning Director: Ph.D. Elżbieta Kozubek Authors: Under supervision of: Piotr Brzeski – project manager (to 12.2017) Ph.D. Elżbieta Kozubek – project manager (since 12.2017) Ph.D. Katarzyna Jędruszczak – deputy project manager (to 03.2018) Project team NSB CoRe: Michał Banak (08.2017-12.2017) Bartłomiej Drąg Beata Gochnio Agata Kucharska Michał Jamróz (since 12.2017) Agnieszka Olbryś (to 08.2017) Sebastian Pawłowski Dariusz Piwowarczyk Piotr Szpiega Ph.D. Łukasz Zaborowski Drawings: Danuta Aleksandrowicz Elżbieta Daciek Michał Jamróz Grzegorz Jurczak Dariusz Oleszczuk Grażyna Zaciura Translation: GROY Translations Proofreading: Barbara Jaworska-Księżak Warsaw 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Rail Baltica .................................................................................................................. 5 1.2. Aim of the analysis ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3. Scope of analysis ......................................................................................................... 7 1.4. Study methods
    [Show full text]
  • Society Register
    ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 4 (4) 2020 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 4 (4) 2020 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan SOCIETY REGISTER 2020 / Vol. 4, No. 4 ISSN: 2544-5502 | DOI: 10.14746/sr EDITORIAL TEAM: Mariusz Baranowski (Editor-in-Chief), Marcos A. Bote (Social Policy Editor), Piotr Cichocki (Quantitative Research Editor), Sławomir Czapnik (Political Science Editor), Piotr Jabkowski (Statistics Editor), Mark D. Juszczak (International Relations), Agnieszka Kanas (Stratification and Inequality Editor), Magdalena Lemańczyk (Anthropology Editor), Urszula Markowska-Manista (Educational Sciences Editor), Bartosz Mika (Sociology of Work Editor), Kamalini Mukherjee (English language Editor), Krzysztof Nowak-Posadzy (Philoso- phy Editor), Anna Odrowąż-Coates (Deputy Editor-in-Chief), Aneta Piektut (Migration Editor). POLISH EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Agnieszka Gromkowska-Melosik, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland); Kazimierz Krzysztofek, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Roman Leppert, Kazimierz Wielki University (Poland); Renata Nowakowska-Siuta, ChAT (Poland); Inetta Nowosad, University of Zielona Góra (Poland); Ewa Przybylska, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland); Piotr Sałustowicz, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Bogusław Śliwerski, University of Lodz (Poland); Aldona Żurek, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland). INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Tony Blackshaw, Sheffield Hallam University (United King- dom); Theodore Chadjipadelis, Aristotle University Thessaloniki (Greece); Kathleen J. Farkas, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); Sribas Goswami, Serampore College, University of Calcutta (India); Bozena Hautaniemi, Stockholm University (Sweden); Kamel Lahmar, University of Sétif 2 (Algeria); Georg Kam- phausen, University of Bayreuth (Germany); Nina Michalikova, University of Central Oklahoma (US); Jaroslaw Richard Romaniuk, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); E.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals Steadily Improve As Lease Rates Rise
    MARKETVIEW Warsaw Offices, Q4 2016 The record volume of space under construction at the end of 2016 5,05 M sq m 14.2% 227,000 sq m 52,100 sq m *Arrows indicate change from the corresponding quarter in the previous year. Figure 1. Building completed in 2016 The Tides (Q4) Q22 (Q2) Warsaw Spire A (Q2) The Tides Property Group Echo Investment Ghelamco Source: CBRE / PORF, Q4 2016 Figure 2. Office market statistics Summary Stock 5,045,400 sq m 2016 completions 417,700 sq m 2017 forecasted completions 360,600 sq m Space under construction 855,900 sq m Vacancy rate 14.2% 2016 take-up 757,700sq m Source: CBRE / PORF, Q4 2016 Q4 2016 CBRE Research © 2017 CBRE sp. z o.o. | 1 MARKETVIEW Figure 3. Completions, absorption and vacancy rate in Warsaw Completions (’000 sq m) Absorption (’000 sq m) Vacancy rate (%) 450 25% 400 350 20% 300 15% 250 200 10% 150 100 5% 50 0 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: CBRE / PORF, Q4 2016 Figure 4. Top 10 largest projects under construction in Warsaw PLANNED ZONE BUILDING OWNER SIZE (SQ M) COMPLETION Q3 2020 CBD Varso HB Reavis 142,000 Q1 2020 CC The Warsaw HUB Ghelamco 84,500 Q3 2019 CC Mennica Legacy Tower Golub GetHouse & Mennica Polska 49,600 Q3 2017 SW West Station II HB Reavis 36,500 Q2 2018 US Business Liner Universale International 28,100 Q3 2017 US D48 Penta Investments 26,000 Q2 2018 CC Copernicus Square WhiteStar/ Tristan Capital Partners 21,300 Q4 2017 CC Generation Park X Skanska Property Poland 21,000 Q3 2017 SE Bobrowiecka 8 Castor Park 20,000 Q1 2018 W Proximo II Hines 20,000 Source: CBRE 2016 Figure 5.
    [Show full text]