Lobbying for the People. Oxymoron Or Common Sense?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lobbying for the People. Oxymoron Or Common Sense? JANUARY 2014 YEAR VI NUMBER 1 Representative democracy or participative democracy? 70% of those who answered a Eurobarometer words, to lobby in the public interest. This is why The question is misleading if posed in such poll in 2009 gave one of the following reasons: we are so enthusiastic about the initiative by Prof. strict alternative terms: a representative system lack of trust or interest in politics generally, no Alemanno and the start-up eLabEurope, whose implies the existence of public opinion. But can confidence that the vote would lead to change, mission is not simply to inform people about EU a person say he is free simply because he has lack of knowledge about the European Union, institutions by setting up an open online course, helped elect an Assembly which doesn’t consult the (amazingly incorrect!) impression that EU but to create a Regulatory Policy Clinic (an him before regulating his rights and obligations? Institutions do not affect people’s daily life. Never absolute novelty in Europe) to give students the Rousseau gave this answer: “The … people before has technology been able to provide such technical and cultural tools they need to become believes itself to be free; it is gravely mistaken; real time information and ideas, so it is ironic lobbyists on behalf of the community. Although it is free only during election of members of that this coincides with a time when citizens fully aware that crowdsourcing democracy cannot Parliament; as soon as the members are elected, are least aware of decision-making mechanisms replace representative democracy, active citizens the people is enslaved. It is nothing. In the brief and, in particular, do not realise how important and professional politicians, each in their own moment of its freedom the … people makes it is to raise their voice in order to influence the field, have a huge task ahead of them to revive such a use of that freedom that it deserves to activities of the Institutions. The result is that participation and restore the electorate’s faith in lose it”. Very seldom has this point of view been after the decline of big, political mass parties, the idea that democracy can lead to change. so widespread: it is so popular that people seem the silent majority of ordinary citizens is (and to no longer appreciate the “brief moment of feels) underrepresented. There are two ways to freedom” they are granted. As a striking example, react to this state of affairs: either to give way the turnout in European elections between to despair for the “spreading plague of lobbying 1979 and 2009 fell by over 20 percentage organisations”, or to work to create fertile fields points: it declined in Italy from 85% to 65%, in which to cultivate new forms of democratic Mariella Palazzolo @Telosaes and in the EU from 62% to 43%. Why? Over participation, suited to our liquid society. In other Telos is a member of the FIPRA network ALEMANNO LOBBYING FOR THE PEOPLE. OXYMORON OR COMMON SENSE? Citizens, especially the young, should exercise oversight on elected personnel and contribute to their work. In short, time is now to lobby in the public interest. Telos: In Europe we are facing a paradox: the interest of the citizens in politics is reviving - also thanks to the economic downturn - but the demand for participation seems to be channeled into an uprising against politics. Is this the signal of an irreversible crisis, or rather a signal of hope for our democracies? Alberto Alemanno: Today, the intellectual pendulum is swinging back to the belief that State action is needed to regulate human affairs. As the only institution standing between individuals and non-State actors, such as corporations and banks, the State - in the aftermath of one of the largest failures of the free market - is indeed poised to prompt citizens’ interest and possibly regain some legitimacy in their eyes. In these circumstances, we witness some sudden demand for political participation, civic engagement and political control over the elected. The re-emerging State is called upon to operate in a very different societal environment than in the past. Empowered by a growing access to a wealth of information induced by the rapidly evolving landscape of connectivity, citizens are ready to exercise control over their representatives in ways that have been unknown until recently. The question therefore is not whether citizens should be involved in governmental affairs, but how to channel their individual and collective contributions. In these circumstances, any claim denouncing the state of despair of democracy appears farfetched. While peoples’ trust in the political system and representatives has eroded - and, as many fear, it is likely to keep on eroding in the future, their interest in politics is resuming. Hence the need to re-think the State in order to update it to the new digital age. Today, access to information has improved to such an extent that allows citizens, as individual or groups, to directly have a say. You are promoting a pioneering educational initiative to encourage the civic engagement of young people: could you explain to us what that is about? Due to the rapidly evolving landscape of connectivity and communications technology, the individuals’ experience of both social and civic life is transformed today. In these newly created circumstances, citizens, especially the young, should not abandon faith in political institutions, but rather exercise oversight on elected officials, and meaningfully contribute to these representatives’ work. In short, time is now to lobby in the public interest. It is under this slogan that eLabEurope, one of the first civic start-ups active on the European scene, promotes civic engagement and participation through an unconventional mixing and matching of academic research and consultancy in the public interest. eLabEurope currently encompasses three major initiatives aimed at educating, experimenting and empowering Europe. In particular, eLabEurope developed - in co-operation with HEC Paris, Stanford-based Coursera and with the support of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Understanding Europe - Why it Matters and What it Can Offer You, the first MOOC devoted to Europe and its decision-making Alberto Alemanno is a legal scholar. He is currently Jean Monnet Professor of Law at HEC Paris and Global Clinical Professor at the New York University School of Law, where he is the Faculty Director of the HEC-NYU Regulatory Policy Clinic. Prior to join the HEC faculty, he clerked for Judge Allan Rosas and Judge Alexander Arabadjiev at the Court of Justice of the European Union and for Enzo Moavero Milanesi at the European General Court. Alemanno is the Founder and CEO of eLabEurope, a civic start up committed to promote civic engagement by experimenting new forms of participatory democracy and nonprofit advocacy in the public interest in Europe and beyond. During the last decade, Alemanno’s research has been focused on the relationship between the regulatory competence of States in furtherance of domestic policies such as public health and food safety, and the preservation of a liberal international trade framework. He is also interested in exploring the role of law in regulating lifestyle choices by integrating the insights of behavioural research in areas such as alcohol, tobacco and nutrition. Alemanno was selected among the 2014 European Young Leaders by the program “40under40” run by EuropaNova and Friends of Europe. Alemanno earned a Laurea in Law from the University of Turin, LLM degrees from Harvard Law School and the College of Europe, and a PhD in International Law and Economics from Bocconi University. Alemanno was born in 1975. He is married, with a daughter and a passion for dressage and running. He lives in Paris, but his haven of rest is his homeland, Monferrato. process. The course aims at popularising the intricacies of the European Union system to promote greater awareness of the opportunities it offers citizens. The EU Regulatory Policy Clinic - built upon the American law clinic model - is the result of a partnership between my two Universities: New York University School of Law and HEC Paris. It is the first clinic devoted to experimenting the various channels of participatory democracy existing in the EU. It focuses especially on the different avenues enabling citizens not only to gain access to the EU decision-making process but also to analyse, critique and support legislative and regulatory proposals. Also we are developing, in partnership with RegulationRoom at Cornell University, a digital platform aimed at boosting civil society’s participation into the EU decision-making process. As a consequence of the spreading of social media, political participation has gradually departed from its traditional forms towards a more direct, almost immediate engagement. Which role will the professional politicians have in the forthcoming democracy in crowdsourcing? Will the agenda of future political leaders be dictated by Twitter? Italian citizens, like those living in any other OECD country, are now more educated and capable of following public affairs than ever before, in particular thanks to digital tools. Yet conventional forms of political participation, having declined considerably, struggle in capturing this demand for participation. Thus, the influence of digital and networked media is conducive to the reconsideration of the traditional practices of civic engagement. In particular, crowdsourcing, a participatory method to engage citizens in political processes, offers exciting possibilities for democracy. Citizens can take part - typically online - in brainstorming, discussing, developing, and even implementing decisions that used to be the domain of political and expert élites. As recently witnessed by the Italian political scene, filling the gap between the inherent elitism of political life and the reality of citizens’ lives may be a rewarding electoral strategy. Yet, as epitomised by the experience gained by the 5 Star Movement, turning the ensuing political capital into political action reveals a different ball-game.
Recommended publications
  • ECHO,Conference,-,Speaker,Profiles
    Dr Alberto Alemanno is Jean Monnet Professor of Law at Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) Paris and Global Clinical Professor at New York University School of Law. Alberto’s research has been centered on the role of - and need for – evidence and public input in domestic and supranational policymaking. In particular, he has been focusing on and promoting the study of the emerging law and policy of risk regulation in both the EU and the WTO legal orders. He has explored, in particular, the use of scientific evidence and behavioural research - as drawn from psychology, cognitive sciences and economics - in regulatory decision-making and in the judicial review of science-based measures by courts. At present, he is working on the legal implications and potential contribution of behavioural research in policymaking across policy areas. Due to his commitment to bridge the gap between academic research and policy action, he regularly provides advice to a variety of NGOs and governments across the world as well as international organizations, such as the the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the World Health Organisation, on various aspects of European Union law, international regulatory cooperation, international trade and global health law as well as evidence-based policymaking. Originally from Italy, Alemanno is a graduate of the College of Europe and Harvard Law School. He holds a PhD in International Law and Economics from Bocconi University. Prior to entering academia full-time, he clerked at the Court of Justice of the European Union, worked as a Teaching Assistant at the College of Europe in Bruges and qualified as an attorney at law in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimitry Vladimirovich Kochenov & Graham Butler
    THE JEAN MONNET PROGRAM J.H.H. Weiler, Director Gráinne de Burca, Director Jean Monnet Working Paper 2/20 Dimitry Vladimirovich Kochenov & Graham Butler The Independence and Lawful Composition of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Replacement of Advocate General Sharpston and the Battle for the Integrity of the Institution NYU School of Law New York, NY 10011 The Jean Monnet Working Paper Series can be found at www.JeanMonnetProgram.org All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. ISSN 2161-0320 (online) Copy Editor: Danielle Leeds Kim © Dimitry Vladimirovich Kochenov & Graham Butler 2020 New York University School of Law New York, NY 10011 USA Publications in the Series should be cited as: AUTHOR, TITLE, JEAN MONNET WORKING PAPER NO./YEAR [URL] The Independence and Lawful Composition of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Replacement of Advocate General Sharpston and the Battle for the Integrity of the Institution Dimitry Vladimirovich Kochenov1 & Graham Butler2 Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 The Brexit Prelude: EU primary law, the Statute of the CJEU, and the rule of law .......... 9 Act I: Member States move to dismiss AG Sharpston, and replace her with Mr. Rantos (Brussels, Sept 2, 2020) ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biographies of Participants
    Biographies of Participants Annual Colloquium on Fundamental Rights Media Pluralism and Democracy 26-27 November 2018 Justice and Consumers The biographies were sent by the participants. The European Commission is not responsible for the content. ACHEN Christopher H. Chris Achen holds the Roger Williams Straus Chair of Social Sciences at Princeton University. His primary research interests are public opinion, elections, and the realities of democratic politics. He is the author or co-author of six books, including Democracy for Realists (with Larry Bartels) in 2016, which has received widespread discussion and several awards. He has also published many articles. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and has received fellowships from the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, the National Science Foundation, and Princeton's Center for the Study of Democratic Politics. He was the founding president of the Political Methodology Society, and he received the first career achievement award from The Political Methodology Section of The American Political Science Association in 2007. He has served on the top social science board at the American National Science Foundation, and he was the chair of the national Council for the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) from 2013-2015. He is also the recipient of awards from the University of Michigan for lifetime achievement in training graduate students and from Princeton University for graduate student mentoring. AFANASJEVA Sonja Sonja Afanasjeva is policy officer in the Secretariat of the Young European Federalists (JEF Europe). Working closely with the Executive Board, she carries out advocacy work towards the European institutions and civil society, in Brussels and beyond, in order to further promote the idea of a free, united and democratic Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement System Alberto Alemanno Harvard Law School, [email protected]
    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Conferences, Lectures, and Workshops Student Conference Papers 4-3-2004 Private parties and WTO Dispute Settlement System Alberto Alemanno Harvard Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/lps_clacp Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, and the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Alemanno, Alberto, "Private parties and WTO Dispute Settlement System " (2004). Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers. Paper 1. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/lps_clacp/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences, Lectures, and Workshops at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Private parties and WTO Dispute Settlement System Who bears the costs of non -compliance and why private parties should not bear them Alberto ALEMANNO “The duty to keep a contract … means a prediction that you must pay damages if you do not keep it-and nothing else ” Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The path of the law , 10 HARVARD L. R. 457 (1897) 1. Introduction The WTO system, by providing rules addressed to both States and private parties, represents the most sophisticated legal framework ever conceived to govern global trade1. Unlike many other international organizations, the WTO has a dispute settlement system characterized by compulsory jurisdiction, strict time frame, automatic decision-making process 2, and is based on a two -tier mechanism of panels of first instance and an Appellate Body (AB).
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Study on the European Commission
    HIDING A FOREST BEHIND THE TREES Transparency, integrity and accountability at the European Commission This in-depth report is an update to the 2014 Transparency International EU study on the EU integrity system Transparency International EU (TI EU) is a regional office of the global anti-corruption movement, Transparency International. Working closely with the International Secretariat in Berlin, Germany, TI EU leads the movement’s EU-focused advocacy in close cooperation with over 100 national chapters worldwide, but particularly with the 23 chapters in EU Member States. TI EU’s mission is to prevent and address corruption and promote integrity, transparency and accountability in EU institutions and in EU internal and external policies, programmes and legislation. www.transparency.eu Authors: Angels Giménez Bofarull, Leo Hoffmann-Axthelm, Matilde Manzi Editor: Leo Hoffmann-Axthelm Design: www.beelzePub.com Photography: Cover: Flags flown at half-mast in front of the Commission’s Berlaymont HQ by European Parliament, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 9: © Daniel Dumbrava via Unsplash Page 10: © Richard Parmiter, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 13: © European Parliament, licensed under CC BY 2.0 Page 15: Illustration © Wannapik Studio Page 18: © Ula Kuzma via Unsplash Page 19: © Quinn Dombrowski, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 Page 20: © Quinn Dombrowski, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 Page 22: © Daniel Dumbrava via Unsplash Page 29: licensed under CC0 Public Domain Page 32: © beasty, via Unsplash Page 34: © Susan Yin, via Unsplash Page 36: © Christian Schnettelker, licensed under CC BY 2.0 Page 38: © European Union Page 41: © Christian Schnettelker, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 Page 42: © Szilas, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.5 Page 48–49: © European Parliament, licensed under CC BY-NC ND 2.0 Page 50: © European Parliament, 2020 Page 51: © Jim Killock, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 Page 52: © Jakob Braun, via Unsplash © 2021 Transparency International EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberto Alemanno Is Jean Monnet Professor in European Union Law and Risk Regulation at HEC Paris
    Alberto Alemanno is Jean Monnet Professor in European Union Law and Risk Regulation at HEC Paris. He is also Global Clinical Professor at New York University School of Law where he directs the HEC-NYU EU Regulatory Policy Clinic and a scholar at the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University Law Center. Prior to joining the HEC faculty, he clerked at the Court of Justice of the European Union, worked as a Teaching Assistant at the College of Europe in Bruges and qualified as an attorney at law in New York. He is one of the leading experts in the areas of EU law and policy, regulation, transparency and open government. He is an emerging public interest lawyer. Alemanno regularly provides advice to a variety of organizations, such as the World Health Organisation, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the UN International Trade Centre, the European Commission, the European Parliament, the European Food Safety Authority and the European Court of Auditors as well as governments across the world on various aspects of European Union law, WTO law and international health law. He has published extensively in the areas of EU law, risk regulation and global health, including the books Trade in Food – Regulatory and Judicial Approaches in the EU and the WTO (Cameron May, 2007), Governing Disasters – The Challenges of Emergency Risk Regulation (Edward Elgar, 2011), Better Business Regulation in a Risk Society (Springer, 2013), Foundations of European Food Law & Policy – The First Ten Years of the European Food Safety Authority (Ashgate, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • EU After Covid Materials
    Center on European Union Law presents The European Union after COVID-19 November 9, 2020 12 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. EDT Zoom Webinar CLE COURSE MATERIALS Table of Contents 1. Speaker Biographies (view in document) 2. CLE Materials The European Union after COVID-19 CLE Panel Discussion Boot, Arnoud W. A. et al. (2020) : The Coronavirus and financial stability, SAFE Policy Letter, No. 78, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, Frankfurt a. M. (view in document) Alemanno, Alberto. The European Response to COVID-19: From Regulartory Emulation to Regulatory Coordination (2020) (view in document) Renda, Andrea; Castro, Rosa. Skadden. Towards Stronger EU Governance of Health Threats after COVID-19 Pandemic (2020) (view in document) World Trade Organization. The Trips Agreement and COVID019. (15 October, 2020) (view in document) The European Union after COVID-19 Speaker Bios Professor Alberto Alemanno Department of Law, HEC Paris Alberto Alemanno is Jean Monnet Professor in European Union Law & Policy and one of the leading voices on the democratization of the European Union. His research has been centered on how the law may be used to improve people’s lives, in particular through the adoption of power-shifting reforms countering social, economic, and political inequalities within European societies and beyond. He has written extensively on risk regulation, public health, consumer rights, food policy as democratic innovation and participatory democracy. Due to his commitment to bridge the gap between academic research and policy action, Alberto was named Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2015 and Ashoka fellow in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Management of Global Emergencies Studies in EU External Relations
    EU Management of Global Emergencies Studies in EU External Relations Edited by Marc Maresceau (Ghent University) Editorial Board Marise Cremona (European University Institute) Günter Burghardt ( former EU ambassador Washington) Alan Dashwood (University of Cambridge) Frank Hoffmeister (European Commission) Pieter Jan Kuijper (University of Amsterdam) VOLUME 8 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/seur EU Management of Global Emergencies Legal Framework for Combating Threats and Crises Edited by Inge Govaere and Sara Poli LEIDEN | BOSTON Aerial photo of Norway. © Przemyslaw Wasilewski, available at http://www.iStock.com. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data EU management of global emergencies : legal framework for combating threats and crises / edited by Inge Govaere and Sara Poli. pages cm. — (Studies in EU external relations ; v. 8) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-26832-6 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-90-04-26833-3 (e-book) 1. Emergency management—Law and legislation--European Union countries. 2. War and emergency legislation— European Union countries. 3. Emergencies—Law and legislation—European Union countries. 4. Crisis management in government—European Union countries. 5. Terrorism—Law and legislation—European Union countries. I. Govaere, Inge, editor of compilation. II. Poli, Sara, editor of compilation. III. Title: European Union management of global emergencies. KJE7520.E97 2014 344.2405’34—dc23 2014014580 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual ‘Brill’ typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, ipa, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 4875-0451 isbn 978 90 04 26832 6 (hardback) isbn 978 90 04 26833 3 (e-book) Copyright 2014 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modernisation of State Ai
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99226-6_3 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Biondi, A., & Stefan, O. (2018). The Notice on the Notion of State Aid: Every light has its shadow. In B. Nascimbene, & A. Di Pascale (Eds.), 'The Modernisation of EU State Aid Control - Evolution and Perspectives of the EU Rules on State Aids and Services of General Economic Interest' Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-99226-6_3 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]