DOCSLIB.ORG

Out of Hibern Ation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Out of Hibern Ation A Russian Tu-95MS Bear bomber takes on fuel from an Il- 78M Midas tanker. The iconic turboprop aircraft dominates Russia’s strategic bomber force. Inset: Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin visits the nuclear-powered subma- rine Alexander Nevsky. Russia has seabed and territory claims in the Arctic and has increased its submarine patrols in the icy waters. Out of Hibern ation After two decades of military decline and costly regional wars, Russia is again investing in—and exercising—its strategic forces. By Marc V. Schanz, Senior Editor 56 AIR FORCE Magazine / February 2012 n the wee hours of Aug. 17, 2007, 14 of Russia’s strategic bombers and a number of support aircraft lumbered into the sky from bases across that country. The synchronized launches were the start of long-range patrols well beyond Russia’s borders. IThe otherwise uneventful missions were noteworthy because they marked the resumption of regular strategic training flights, which Russia had mounted only sporadically in the post-Cold War era. “We have decided to restore flights by Russian strategic aviation on a per- manent basis,” Russia’s then-President Vladimir Putin announced, adding that the mission marked the beginning of conducting such patrols “on a regular basis.” In a remark to reporters that was undoubtedly meant for US consump- tion, he said, “We hope our partners will treat this with understanding.” ITAR/Tass photoITAR/Tass by Artyom Korotayev Out of Hibern ation Facing demographic and economic challenges, Russia is slowly rebuilding and refurbishing its strategic forces— occasionally using them to assert its interests. Russia’s conventional power has proved less than decisive in operations ranging from the bloody and costly Chechnya conflicts of the 1990s to the Georgian conflict of 2008. After the Georgia campaign, some retired Russian military officials openly criti- cized the operation, saying troubles with command and control and lack Photo Yevgeniy Kazennov by of appropriate equipment compounded AIR FORCE Magazine / February 2012 57 Yuri Dolgorukiy during sea trials. The submarine will be capable of launching Rus- sia’s Bulava ballistic missile, still in development. Photo by Alexey Victorovich Schekinov other persistent problems to deny Rus- North Atlantic to the Arctic and even revitalization is domestic political sia clear success. the waters near Guam. gain. The moves increase Russian “If they were honest, they would Russia and China both are expanding perceptions of national strength. prefer to have conventional military the amount of area they cover in sur- Russia is carefully trying to rebuild capability—but they don’t,” noted veillance and exercise tracks outside the prestige many officials in govern- Russian military analyst Charles L. their national airspace, but that’s not ment and the military believe the nation Thornton. As recent exercises have particularly alarming to Pacific Air has lost since the end of the Cold War. demonstrated repeatedly, Russia’s Forces chief Gen. Gary L. North. “A lot of the analyses on Russian military clout depends on its strategic “That’s why they call it international activities [assume] Russia is a single forces—and this perception within airspace,” he quipped to reporters at the entity,” said Thornton, the Washington, Russia is driving a renewal of the Air Force Association’s Air & Space D.C., area director of an intelligence country’s strategic arms. Conference this past September. consulting firm, Operational Surveyors Much like the US, Russia plans to “The Russians are out quite a bit, Inc., and a fellow at the Center for revamp its strategic weapons in the extending their long range capabili- International and Security Studies at wake of the April 2010 signing of the ties,” he said. “It gives them an op- the University of Maryland. “There New START agreement. New START portunity to do long-range training. are a lot of different actors inside limits each country to 1,550 deployed Clearly, their maintenance is doing that country; they all have different strategic warheads and 800 delivery much better, their training is doing perspectives. There are both external systems, including both deployed and much better, so they are out there quite national security reasons [for their ac- nondeployed. According to estimates a bit,” North observed. tions] and internal domestic political by the Congressional Research Service, reasons for it.” after New START reductions, Russia Reinvigorating the Triad Thornton, who first worked with the will field about 400 deployed delivery The Russian bomber fleet has in- Russians in the 1990s under the Coop- vehicles and 1,335 deployed warheads creased its participation in both Rus- erative Threat Reduction Program, has (counting each bomber as one warhead). sian and multilateral exercises in the since built extensive contacts among The new nuclear force structure last few years as well, sometimes military officials there. The renewal will be more modern, though. New pairing the Bear with its more modern, of the flying program, he said, is part systems being deployed include the swing-wing jet aircraft counterpart, of Russia’s attempt to reinvigorate its SS-27 intercontinental ballistic missile the Tupolev Tu-160 Blackjack. strategic triad. multiple warhead variant, the RS-24, Despite their age, the bombers still The Strategic Rocket Forces—the which will replace three older missile pack a credible deterrent capability. branch of the Russian military respon- systems. Russia is also moving ahead In October 2008, the exercise Stabil- sible for the country’s ICBMs—has on testing and development of the ity-2008 saw Bears firing live, air always been the prime emphasis of Bulava SS-N-32 sea launched ballistic launched cruise missiles for the first the country’s strategic planning and missile for its submarine fleet and the time since 1984. The Kh-55 cruise mis- doctrine, with submarines second in new Borey-class SSBN, to replace sile, called the AS-15 Kent by NATO, the pecking order. two older systems: the SS-N-18 and is key to the bomber’s longevity and The resumption of the bomber patrols Delta III. place in Russia’s strategic forces, just dovetails with Russia’s planned stra- Russia’s strategic bomber force, as the US B-52 fleet is dependent on tegic modernization. For many years, meanwhile, continues to be dominated standoff cruise missiles for nuclear there were no regular bomber training by the iconic turboprop Tu-95 Bear—a operations. flights, and now the military feels the mainstay of these now-regular patrols With a range of about 2,000 miles, bomber fleet must be brought back up in both the European and Pacific the Kent will keep the Bear fleet to standards. theaters. strategically relevant for years. Each “The bomber link has always been Since the August 2007 announce- Tu-95 can fly patterns from standoff the weakest,” Thornton asserted. ment, Russian bombers have flown distances and hold prospective targets The Russian bombers will receive long-range sorties far from the periph- at risk with at least six cruise missiles. substantial modernization funds, if eries of both its European and Pacific One indisputable purpose of Rus- Russian defense plans are any indica- territory—from Scandinavia and the sia’s strategic exercises and nuclear tion. Russia has 77 Blackjack and Bear 58 AIR FORCE Magazine / February 2012 strategic bombers combined and plans upgrades to the targeting and navigation systems of both aircraft at a rate of two or three per year, concluding in 2015. By the end of the New START pro- cess, Russia’s bomber force will consist Photo Yevgeniy Kazennov by of 13 upgraded Blackjacks and 63 up- graded Bears; one Blackjack, though more modern than the Bear, will be retired before then. Reportedly, Russia plans to replace all of its strategic bombers with a new stealth aircraft in the 2025 to 2030 timeframe—roughly the same window in which the US Air Force wants to field its next long-range strategic bomber. A Tu-160 Blackjack bomber taxis at Engels Air Base in Russia. The modern The Tupolev Design Bureau began swing-wing bomber is sometimes paired with the Bear during Russian and development of the new bomber via a multilateral training exercises. contract with the Defense Ministry in 2009, and the airplane would likely be deployed after New START expires. Routes over the Arctic are a frequent but frankly have little to no impact, In 2010, Putin, who had since become path for Russian bombers on their long- said US Permanent Representative to Prime Minister, said Russia must “think range aviation patrols and represent the NATO Ivo H. Daalder in December. and get down to work on a next genera- most direct route to the North Atlantic, “If there is a desire by Russia to try to tion, long-range aviation complex—our Thornton noted. do this [in order] to intimidate people, new strategic missile carrier” and that Bomber flights have grown in length it’s not working. ... In fact, [it] gives top Russian aerospace industrial priori- and range, even penetrating Western air defense capabilities good training ties should be to design engines, new Europe’s sovereign airspace. to get up in the skies and fly,” he said. materials, and electronics for such a In August, two Royal Netherlands “It’s not seen as a change in the project. Air Force F-16s intercepted a pair of Russian direction,” Daalder said of Russian Bear bombers flying just outside the NATO allies’ opinion of the op- No Strategic Purpose of Dutch airspace without identifying erations. “It has no strategic [purpose Along with the intensified bomber themselves; on the same mission, they behind it.] … They are trying to flights, Russia is increasing its sub- had first been intercepted by Danish modernize their strategic capability; marine patrols in the Arctic, where fighters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History 251 Medieval Russia
    Medieval Russia Christian Raffensperger History 251H/C - 1W Fall Semester - 2012 MWF 11:30-12:30 Hollenbeck 318 Russia occupies a unique position between Europe and Asia. This class will explore the creation of the Russian state, and the foundation of the question of is Russia European or Asian? We will begin with the exploration and settlement of the Vikings in Eastern Europe, which began the genesis of the state known as “Rus’.” That state was integrated into the larger medieval world through a variety of means, from Christianization, to dynastic marriage, and economic ties. However, over the course of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries the creation of the crusading ideal and the arrival of the Mongols began the process of separating Rus’ (becoming Russia) from the rest of Europe. This continued with the creation of power centers in NE Russia, and the transition of the idea of empire from Byzantium at its fall to Muscovy. This story of medieval Russia is a unique one that impacts both the traditional history of medieval Europe, as well as the birth of the first Eurasian empire. Professor: Christian Raffensperger Office: Hollenbeck 311 Office Phone: 937-327-7843 Office Hours: MWF 9:00–11:00 A.M. or by appointment E-mail address: [email protected] Assignments and Deadlines The format for this class is lecture and discussion, and thus attendance is a main requirement of the course, as is participation. As a way to track your progress on the readings, there will be a series of quizzes during class. All quizzes will be unannounced.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #952
    Issue No. 952, 28 October 2011 Articles & Other Documents: Featured Article: U.S. Releases New START Nuke Data 1. 'IAEA Report Can Stymie Iran-P5+1 Talks' 2. German Wavers over Sale of Sub to Israel: Report 3. Armenian Nuclear Specialists Move to Iran for Better Life 4. Seoul, US Cautiously Move on 6-Party Talks 5. N. Korea Remains Serious Threat: US Defence Chief 6. Seoul, Beijing Discuss NK Issues 7. Pentagon Chief Doubts N. Korea Will Give Up Nukes 8. U.S.’s Panetta and South Korea’s Kim Warn Against North Korean Aggression 9. Pakistan Tests Nuclear-Capable Hatf-7 Cruise Missile 10. Libya: Stockpiles of Chemical Weapons Found 11. U.S. Has 'Nuclear Superiority' over Russia 12. Alexander Nevsky Sub to Be Put into Service in Late 2012 13. New Subs Made of Old Spare Parts 14. Successful Test Launch for Russia’s Bulava Missile 15. Topol Ballistic Missiles May Stay in Service until 2019 16. U.S. Releases New START Nuke Data 17. Army Says Umatilla Depot's Chemical Weapons Mission Done 18. Iran Dangerous Now, Imagine It Nuclear 19. START Treaty: Never-Ending Story 20. The "Underground Great Wall:" An Alternative Explanation 21. What’s Down There? China’s Tunnels and Nuclear Capabilities 22. Visits Timely and Important 23. Surgical Strikes Against Key Facilities would Force Iran to Face Military Reality 24. KAHLILI: Iran Already Has Nuclear Weapons Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information.
    [Show full text]
  • EMR 12029 Alexander Nevsky
    Alexander Nevsky Russia under the Mongolian yoke / Arise, you Russian people / The Battle On Ice The Field of the Dead / Alexander’s Entry Into Pskov Wind Band / Concert Band / Harmonie / Blasorchester Arr.: John Glenesk Mortimer Sergeï Prokofiev EMR 12029 st 1 Score 2 1 Trombone + nd 1 Piccolo 2 2 Trombone + 8 Flute 1 Bass Trombone + 1 Oboe (optional) 2 Baritone + 1 Bassoon (optional) 2 E Bass 1 E Clarinet (optional) 2 B Bass st 5 1 B Clarinet 1 Tuba 4 2nd B Clarinet 1 String Bass (optional) 4 3rd B Clarinet 1 Timpani 1 B Bass Clarinet (optional) 1 1st Percussion (Xylophone / Glockenspiel / Snare Drum 1 B Soprano Saxophone (optional) Wood Block) 2 1st E Alto Saxophone 1 2nd Percussion (Cymbals / Bass Drum / Triangle) 2 2nd E Alto Saxophone 1 3rd Percussion (Tam-Tam / Tambourine / Suspended 2 B Tenor Saxophone Cymbal) 1 E Baritone Saxophone (optional) 1 E Trumpet / Cornet (optional) Special Parts 2 1st B Trumpet / Cornet 1 1st B Trombone 2 2nd B Trumpet / Cornet 1 2nd B Trombone 2 3rd B Trumpet / Cornet 1 B Bass Trombone 2 1st F & E Horn 1 B Baritone 2 2nd F & E Horn 1 E Tuba 2 3rd F & E Horn 1 B Tuba Print & Listen Drucken & Anhören Imprimer & Ecouter ≤ www.reift.ch Route du Golf 150 CH-3963 Crans-Montana (Switzerland) Tel. +41 (0) 27 483 12 00 Fax +41 (0) 27 483 42 43 E-Mail : [email protected] www.reift.ch DISCOGRAPHY Cinemagic 39 Track Titel / Title Time N° EMR N° EMR N° (Komponist / Composer) Blasorchester Brass Band Concert Band 1 Terminator (Fiedel) 5’34 EMR 12074 EMR 9718 2 Robocop 3 (Poledouris) 3’39 EMR 12131 EMR 9719 3 Rio Bravo (Tiomkin) 4’22 EMR 12085 EMR 9720 4 The Poseidon (Badelt) 4’02 EMR 12116 EMR 9721 5 Another Brick In The Wall (Waters) 4’14 EMR 12068 EMR 9722 6 Alexander Nevsky (Prokofiev) 9’48 EMR 12029 - 7 I’m Dreaming Of Home (Rombi) 4’38 EMR 12115 EMR 9723 8 Spartacus (Vengeance) (LoDuca) 4’13 EMR 12118 EMR 9724 9 The Crimson Pirate (Alwyn) 5’08 EMR 12041 EMR 9725 Zu bestellen bei • A commander chez • To be ordered from: Editions Marc Reift • Route du Golf 150 • CH-3963 Crans-Montana (Switzerland) • Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • History Is Made in the Dark 4: Alexander Nevsky: the Prince, the Filmmaker and the Dictator
    1 History Is Made in the Dark 4: Alexander Nevsky: The Prince, the Filmmaker and the Dictator In May 1937, Sergei Eisenstein was offered the opportunity to make a feature film on one of two figures from Russian history, the folk hero Ivan Susanin (d. 1613) or the mediaeval ruler Alexander Nevsky (1220-1263). He opted for Nevsky. Permission for Eisenstein to proceed with the new project ultimately came from within the Kremlin, with the support of Joseph Stalin himself. The Soviet dictator was something of a cinephile, and he often intervened in Soviet film affairs. This high-level authorisation meant that the USSR’s most renowned filmmaker would have the opportunity to complete his first feature in some eight years, if he could get it through Stalinist Russia’s censorship apparatus. For his part, Eisenstein was prepared to retreat into history for his newest film topic. Movies on contemporary affairs often fell victim to Soviet censors, as Eisenstein had learned all too well a few months earlier when his collectivisation film, Bezhin Meadow (1937), was banned. But because relatively little was known about Nevsky’s life, Eisenstein told a colleague: “Nobody can 1 2 find fault with me. Whatever I do, the historians and the so-called ‘consultants’ [i.e. censors] won’t be able to argue with me”.i What was known about Alexander Nevsky was a mixture of history and legend, but the historical memory that was most relevant to the modern situation was Alexander’s legacy as a diplomat and military leader, defending a key western sector of mediaeval Russia from foreign foes.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Russian Force Modernization Dr
    Changing Character of War Centre Pembroke College, University of Oxford With Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson Foundation Factors Influencing Russian Force Modernization Dr. Lester Grau and Charles K. Bartles1 September 2018 A wide-spread Russian perception is that Russia is back as a significant Eurasian power whose opinions and desires need to be understood and accommodated. Russia has regained its national pride, confidence and sense of destiny. Russia still feels threatened from the south and the west and is taking political and military steps to deal with that unease. Historically, Russia feels most secure when it has a strong leader and a strong military. Russians are willing to forego much in order to ensure their security. There are perceived internal and external threats to the Russian state and Russia is addressing these through military reform, military restructuring, force modernization, equipment modernization as well as domestic security restructuring and modernization. Understanding those factors that drive these actions facilitates and potential forms of future war may assist understanding Russian official statements and actions. External Factors The Character of Future War Russia and the Soviet Union have always been primarily a ground power, with the Navy and Air Force functioning as supporting services. After the Second World War, the Soviets believed that future modem warfare would closely resemble the battles they had fought in the last years of the war, albeit with nuclear weapons.2 The military that the Russian Federation inherited in the 1990s had a bloated command structure designed for the command and control of literally thousands of divisions, regiments, and battalions, with the vast majority of these units being ‘skeleton units’ manned by small cadres that would help flesh out the unit with conscripts and reservists in the event of a mass mobilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Missile Chronology
    Kazakhstan Missile Chronology Last update: May 2010 As of May 2010, this chronology is no longer being updated. For current developments, please see the Kazakhstan Missile Overview. This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. 2009-1947 March 2009 On 4 March 2009, Kazakhstan signed a contract to purchase S-300 air defense missile systems from Russia. According to Ministry of Defense officials, Kazakhstan plans to purchase 10 batteries of S-300PS by 2011. Kazakhstan's Air Defense Commander Aleksandr Sorokin mentioned, however, that the 10 batteries would still not be enough to shield all the most vital" facilities designated earlier by a presidential decree. The export version of S- 300PS (NATO designation SA-10C Grumble) has a maximum range of 75 km and can hit targets moving at up to 1200 m/s at a minimum altitude of 25 meters.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth Air Force - from B-29S to Icbms a Proud Past…A Bright Future
    Twentieth Air Force - From B-29s To ICBMs A Proud Past…A Bright Future by Major General Tom Neary Commander, Twentieth Air Force THE TWENTIETH AIR FORCE LEGACY As I come to work each day, I pass a picture gallery of the former Commanders of Twentieth Air Force. From it, the faces of great leaders like Hap Arnold, Curtis LeMay, and Nathan Twining remind me of the rich heritage of this numbered air force. The great warfighting organization these magnificent Air Force pioneers organized and led during World War II lives on today as "America’s ICBM Team"--modern day professionals carrying on the legacy of air power excellence born in the South Pacific in 1944. We remain linked to the original Twentieth Air Force in many ways. Pictured are Lieutenant Fiske Hanley, WW II veteran, and Captain Keith McCartney, 341st Space Wing, Malmstrom AFB MT. They are past and present representatives of the thousands of courageous airmen who founded, formed and now carry on our superb legacy. Although separated by five decades of history, Hanley and McCartney understand full well how crucial their missions were, and now are to the security of America. They also share another important linkage in history. While Fiske Hanley’s Twentieth Air Force of 1945 employed nuclear weapons to stop a horrible world war, Captain Keith McCartney stands alert in today’s Capt Keith McCartney in command Twentieth Air Force committed to preventing war at a Minuteman III launch control through nuclear deterrence and professional stewardship console of America’s nuclear arsenal. With our legacy as a preface, I invite you to join me on a journey through Twentieth Air Force--from the South Pacific in 1944, to the ICBM fields of rural America today, and on to our bright future as a relevant and important part of America’s national security team.
    [Show full text]
  • Reagan and the Soviet Union: Competing Military Strategies, 1980-1988
    4 Reagan and the Soviet Union: Competing Military Strategies, 1980-1988 David M. Glantz This essay evaluates the policies and military strategy introduced by U.S. Pres- ident Ronald Reagan vis-à-vis the Soviet Union, within the context of over forty years of intense strategic competition called the Cold War. The Cold War remained “cold” because the two competing countries emerged from the World War as victorious superpower with unchallenged military capabilities and un- precedented territories either under their control or within their spheres of in- fluence. Despite sharply differing ideologies and political systems, the United States and Soviet Union understood the risks and potential costs of war, espe- cially after both became atomic powers by the late 1940s. Both recognized that deliberately unleashing a world war was no longer a rational act. Given this unique constraint, the ensuing completion became a prolonged game of strategic “cat and mouse,” as the two counties jockeyed with each other for a more advantageous position militarily, politically, and economically. The instruments of this game were specific military strategies governing the nature of the competition and setting limits on the countries’ military actions, all of which acknowledged that the nuclear balance was quite literally a mutually-rec- ognized balance of terror. David M. Glantz, “Reagan and the Soviet Union: Competing Military Strategies, 1980-1988,” Essay, Enduring Legacy Project, John A. Adams ’71 Center for Military History & Strategic Analysis, Virginia Military Institute, 2014. 2 Conventional wisdom concerning the Cold War maintains that this “cat and mouse” game played out successfully, that is, relatively peacefully, because neither side was willing to violate the constraints imposed by this balance of ter- ror.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Factors for the New Start Extension1
    CRITICAL FACTORS FOR THE NEW START EXTENSION1 Victor Esin2 In the current circumstances, the preservation of the New START treaty, signed by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and US President Barack Obama in Prague on April 8, 2010, is probably the only realistic chance to ensure an acceptable level of strategic stability in US-Russian relations in the immediate term. The stabilizing influence of this Treaty is obvious because the ceilings on strategic offensive weapons and the transparency measures agreed under New START limit Russian-US rivalry in the area of strategic nuclear arms, when tensions between Moscow and Washington are running high.3 Cooperation in the framework of the New START verification mechanisms, including on-site inspections, has become even more important because following the collapse of the INF Treaty on August 2, 2019, mutual trust is severely undermined. Without an extension, New START is currently due to expire on February 5, 2021. Under the terms of Article XIV of the Treaty, should the parties agree to an extension, such an extension cannot be longer than 5 years. Do the two parties to the Treaty have any motivation to preserve it by means of extension? I believe the answer is yes, for both Russia and the United States. Russia seeks to limit Washington’s freedom to ramp up the US strategic nuclear arsenal so as not to be dragged into another unrestrained nuclear arms race. If the United States were no longer bound by the terms of New START, it would be able rapidly to increase the number of its nuclear warheads installed on deployed ICBMs from the current 400 to 800 thanks to its existing upload potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenstein's "Ivan the Terrible, Part II" As Cultural Artifact Beverly Blois
    Eisenstein's "Ivan The Terrible, Part II" as Cultural Artifact Beverly Blois In one of the most famous Russian paintings, Ilya Repin's "Ivan the Terrible with his murdered son," an unkempt and wild-eyed tsar clutches his expiring son, from whose forehead blood pours forth. Lying beside the two men is a large staff with which, moments earlier, Ivan had in a fit of rage struck his heir-apparent a mortal blow. This was a poignant, in fact tragic, moment in the history of Russia because from this event of the year 1581, a line of rulers stretching back to the ninth century effectively came to an end, ushering in a few years later the smutnoe vermia ("time of trouble") the only social crisis in Russian history that bears comparison with the revolution of 1917. Contemporary Russians tell an anekdot about this painting in which an Intourist guide, leading a group of Westerners rapidly through the rooms of the Tretiakov Gallery in Moscow, comes to Repin's canvas, and wishing, as always, to put the best face on things, says, "And here we have famous painting, Ivan the Terrible giving first aid to his son." The terribilita of the sixteenth century tsar had been modernized to fit the needs of the mid-twentieth century. Ivan had been reinterpreted. In a similar, but not so trifling way, Sergei Eisenstein was expected to translate the outlines of Ivan's accomplishments into the modern language of socialist realism when he was commissioned to produce his Ivan films in 1941. While part one of his film, released in 1945, won the Stalin Prize, First Class, part two, which was very dose to release in 1946, was instead withheld.
    [Show full text]
  • POSITION About the Eleventh International Youth Film
    POSITION About the eleventh international youth film festival "Light to the world", dedicated to the 800th anniversary of the birth of the Holy Grand Duke Alexander Nevsky. (May 12-15, 2021, Yaroslavl oblast) (The date of the final can be changed to an indefinite period in connection with the pandemic) "I am the light of the world; he who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life" (Jn. 8: 12) 1. Objective: to promote the spiritual, moral, Patriotic and aesthetic education of the modern youth. 2. Tasks: - create an environment of healthy creative communication between children's and youth film studios and individual young film enthusiasts; - provide methodological and practical assistance to specialists working in the field of children's and youth film-making, as well as education and upbringing of children and youth; - identify and support gifted children; - identify and support young film enthusiasts and film enthusiasts who make films for children, promote traditional spiritual and moral values, patriotism, and a healthy lifestyle. 3. The organizers of the competition: The festival is co-organized by the Rybinsk diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church and the National copyright holders support Fund (Moscow). The project is being implemented in 2021 using a grant from the President of the Russian Federation for the development of civil society provided by the presidential grants Fund. The festival is supported by the administration of the Yaroslavl region and its subjects, state, commercial and public structures, PIA " Russian chronicle "(Yaroslavl), the center" Sunny " (Rybinsk), the gallery of modern Orthodox art and painting" Under the Holy cover " (Uglich), as well as the media.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle of Novgorod 1016-1471
    - THE CHRONICLE OF NOVGOROD 1016-1471 TRANSLATED FROM THE RUSSIAN BY ROBERT ,MICHELL AND NEVILL FORBES, Ph.D. Reader in Russian in the University of Oxford WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY C. RAYMOND BEAZLEY, D.Litt. Professor of Modern History in the University of Birmingham AND AN ACCOUNT OF THE TEXT BY A. A. SHAKHMATOV Professor in the University of St. Petersburg CAMDEN’THIRD SERIES I VOL. xxv LONDON OFFICES OF THE SOCIETY 6 63 7 SOUTH SQUARE GRAY’S INN, W.C. 1914 _. -- . .-’ ._ . .e. ._ ‘- -v‘. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE General Introduction (and Notes to Introduction) . vii-xxxvi Account of the Text . xxx%-xli Lists of Titles, Technical terms, etc. xlii-xliii The Chronicle . I-zzo Appendix . 221 tJlxon the Bibliography . 223-4 . 225-37 GENERAL INTRODUCTION I. THE REPUBLIC OF NOVGOROD (‘ LORD NOVGOROD THE GREAT," Gospodin Velikii Novgorod, as it once called itself, is the starting-point of Russian history. It is also without a rival among the Russian city-states of the Middle Ages. Kiev and Moscow are greater in political importance, especially in the earliest and latest mediaeval times-before the Second Crusade and after the fall of Constantinople-but no Russian town of any age has the same individuality and self-sufficiency, the same sturdy republican independence, activity, and success. Who can stand against God and the Great Novgorod ?-Kto protiv Boga i Velikago Novgoroda .J-was the famous proverbial expression of this self-sufficiency and success. From the beginning of the Crusading Age to the fall of the Byzantine Empire Novgorod is unique among Russian cities, not only for its population, its commerce, and its citizen army (assuring it almost complete freedom from external domination even in the Mongol Age), but also as controlling an empire, or sphere of influence, extending over the far North from Lapland to the Urals and the Ob.
    [Show full text]