DOCSLIB.ORG

1999 Instructions 3520

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1999 Instructions 3520 Department of the Treasury 1999 Internal Revenue Service Instructions for Form 3520 Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted. Contents Page Complete the first part of page 1 and the relevant General Instructions .................. 1 portions of Part I. See the instructions for Part I. 2. You are a U.S. person who, during the current tax Purpose of Form ..................... 1 year, is treated as the owner of any part of the assets of Who Must File ....................... 1 a foreign trust under the grantor trust rules. When and Where To File ................ 2 Complete the first part of page 1 and Part II. See the Joint Returns ....................... 2 instructions for Part II. Inconsistent Treatment of Items ............. 2 3. You are a U.S. person who, during the current tax year, received a distribution from a foreign trust, or a Definitions ........................2–4 related foreign trust held an outstanding obligation issued Penalties .......................... 4 by you (or a person related to you) that you treated as a Who Must Sign ...................... 5 qualified obligation (defined on page 3) during the current tax year. Specific Instructions .................. 5 Complete the first part of page 1 and Part III. See the Period Covered ...................... 5 instructions for Part III. Identification Numbers and Addresses ......... 5 4. You are a U.S. person who, during the current tax Item A ........................... 5 year, received either: Part I ............................ 5 a. More than $100,000 from a nonresident alien individual or a foreign estate (including foreign persons Schedule A ........................ 5 related to that nonresident alien individual or foreign Schedule B ........................ 6 estate) that you treated as gifts or bequests, or Schedule C ........................ 6 b. More than $10,735 from foreign corporations or Part II ............................ 6 foreign partnerships (including foreign persons related to such foreign corporations or foreign partnerships) that you Part III ........................... 7 treated as gifts. Schedule A ........................ 8 Complete the first part of page 1 and Part IV. See the Schedule B ........................ 8 instructions for Part IV. Schedule C ........................ 9 Note: You may also be required to file Form TD F Table B .......................... 9 90–22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts. Part IV ........................... 9 Exceptions to filing Form 3520. Form 3520 does not have to be filed to report the following transactions: Country Codes ................... 11–12 ● Transfers to foreign trusts described in sections 402(b), General Instructions 404(a)(4), or 404A. ● Fair market value (FMV) transfers by a U.S. person to a foreign nongrantor trust (or other transfers that are Purpose of Form treated as FMV transfers by reason of the receipt of a U.S. persons file Form 3520 to report: qualified obligation). ● Certain transactions with foreign trusts, and ● Transfers to foreign trusts that have a current ● Receipt of certain large gifts or bequests from certain determination letter from the IRS recognizing their status foreign persons. as exempt from income taxation under section 501(c)(3). A separate Form 3520 must be filed for transactions ● Transfers to, distributions from, and ownership of with each foreign trust. Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans if the trust would qualify for treaty benefits under the Convention Who Must File Between the United States of America and Canada With Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital. However, if File Form 3520 if: for any taxable year you rely on the tax treaty with Canada 1. You are the responsible party for reporting a to avoid information reporting, you are required to disclose reportable event that occurred during the current tax this position pursuant to section 6114. See Pub. 901, year, or you held an outstanding obligation of a related U.S. Tax Treaties. foreign trust (or a person related to the trust) that you ● Distributions from foreign trusts that are taxable as treated as a qualified obligation during the current tax compensation for services rendered (within the meaning year. Responsible party, reportable event, and of section 672(f)(2)(B) and its regulations), so long as the qualified obligation are defined on page 3. Cat. No. 23068I recipient reports the distribution as compensation income See the instructions for Part I, Schedule A, and Part III, on its applicable Federal income tax return. for special rules with respect to obligations made to, or ● Distributions from foreign trusts to domestic trusts that received from, a foreign trust. have a current determination letter from the IRS recognizing their status as exempt from income taxation Foreign trust under section 501(c)(3). A foreign trust is any trust other than a domestic trust. A domestic trust is any trust if: When and Where To File 1. A court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, In general, Form 3520 is due on the date that your income and tax return is due, including extensions. Attach the form to your income tax return. In addition, send a copy to the 2. One or more U.S. persons have the authority to Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, PA 19255. control all substantial decisions of the trust. Form 3520 must have all required attachments to be Grantor considered complete. A grantor is any person who creates a trust or makes a gratuitous transfer of cash or other property to a trust. A Joint Returns grantor includes any person treated as the owner of any Two transferors or grantors of the same foreign trust, or part of a foreign trust's assets under sections 671 through two U.S. beneficiaries of the same foreign trust, may file 679, excluding section 678. a joint Form 3520, but only if they file a joint income tax Note: Where a partnership or corporation makes a return. gratuitous transfer to a trust, the partners or shareholders, as the case may be, are generally treated as the grantors Inconsistent Treatment of Items of the trust, unless the partnership or corporation made The U.S. beneficiary and U.S. owner's tax return must be the transfer for a business purpose of the partnership or consistent with the Form 3520–A, Annual Information corporation. Return of a Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner, filed by the Grantor trust foreign trust unless you report the inconsistency to the IRS. If you are treating items on your tax return differently A grantor trust is any trust to the extent that the assets from the way the foreign trust treated them on its return, of the trust are treated as owned by a person other than file Form 8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment or the trust. See the grantor trust rules below. A part of the Amended Return (Administrative Adjustment Request trust may be treated as a grantor trust to the extent that (AAR)). Get Form 8082 for more details. only a portion of the trust assets are owned by a person other than the trust. Definitions Grantor trust rules Distribution The grantor trust rules are contained in subpart E of Part I of subchapter J (sections 671 through 679). A distribution is any gratuitous transfer of money or other property from a trust, whether or not the trust is treated Gratuitous transfer as owned by another person under the grantor trust rules, A gratuitous transfer to a foreign trust is any transfer to and without regard to whether the recipient is designated the trust other than (a) a transfer for FMV or (b) a as a beneficiary by the terms of the trust. A distribution corporate or partnership distribution. A transfer of property includes the receipt of trust corpus and the receipt of a to a trust may be considered a gratuitous transfer without gift or bequest described in section 663(a). regard to whether the transfer is a gift for gift tax purposes A distribution also includes constructive transfers from (see Chapter 12 of Subtitle B of the Code). a trust. For example, if charges you make on a credit card For purposes of this determination, if a U.S. person are paid by a foreign trust or guaranteed or secured by the contributed property to a trust in exchange for any type assets of a foreign trust, the amount charged will be of interest in the trust, such interest in the trust will be treated as a distribution to you by the foreign trust. disregarded in determining whether FMV has been Similarly, if you write checks on a foreign trust's bank received. In addition, a U.S. person will not be treated as account, the amount will be treated as a distribution. making a transfer for FMV merely because the transferor Also, if you receive a payment from a foreign trust in is deemed to recognize gain on the transaction. exchange for property transferred to the trust or services If you transfer property to a foreign trust in exchange for rendered to the trust, and the FMV of the payment an obligation of the trust (or a person related to the trust), received exceeds the FMV of the property transferred or it will be a gratuitous transfer unless the obligation is a services rendered, the excess will be treated as a qualified obligation (defined on page 3). distribution to you. For example: Gross reportable amount ● If you sell stock with an FMV of $100 to a foreign trust Gross reportable amount is: and receive $150 in exchange, you have received a ● The gross value of property involved in the creation of distribution of $50. a foreign trust or the transfer of property to a foreign trust ● Similarly, if you receive $100 from the trust for services (including a transfer by reason of death); performed by you for the trust, and the services have an ● The gross value of any portion of a foreign trust treated FMV of $20, you have received a distribution of $80.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1999 Instructions for 8804
    Department of the Treasury 1999 Internal Revenue Service Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813 Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted. Paperwork Reduction Act Notice. We ask for the information on these forms to carry partner in any tax year must file Forms out the Internal Revenue laws of the United States. You are required to give us the 8804 and 8805 whether or not information. We need it to ensure that you are complying with these laws and to allow distributions were made during the us to figure and collect the right amount of tax. partnership's tax year. The partnership You are not required to provide the information requested on a form that is subject may designate a person to file the forms. to the Paperwork Reduction Act unless the form displays a valid OMB control number. The partnership, or person it designates, Books or records relating to a form or its instructions must be retained as long as their must file these forms even if the contents may become material in the administration of any Internal Revenue law. partnership has no withholding tax liability Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential, as required by section under section 1446. 6103. Publicly traded partnerships must file The time needed to complete and file these forms will vary depending on individual these forms only if they have elected to circumstances. The estimated average times are: pay section 1446 withholding tax based on effectively connected taxable income Form 8804 8805 8813 allocable to its foreign partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us. Contenu archivé L'information archivée sur le Web est disponible à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de dossiers seulement. Elle n’a été ni modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date d’archivage. Les pages archivées sur le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique de communication du gouvernement du Canada, vous pouvez obtenir cette information dans un format de rechange en communiquant avec nous. The Future of Peace Support Operations Paper Submitted to the ISROP Programme at the Department of Foreign Affairs, Canada March 2003 By Jane Boulden Introduction The purpose of this paper is to examine the evolution of peace support operations since the end of the Cold War and on that basis to discuss the possible form future operations might take and the context in which they might be carried out. To do this the paper has five sections. The first section provides background by briefly describing the provisions for peace support in the United Nations Charter, and the nature of the Cold War experience in peace support. In the second section the paper outlines the evolving nature of peace support operations by first tracing the changing nature of peace support operations in the post-Cold War era, and then discussing the accompanying changes in the approach to peace support – the way in which peace support was pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 12. 1999 L 316/32
    L 316/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 12. 1999 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2605/1999 of 9 December 1999 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, between the Member States. Sectoral regulations may also contain codes for groupings of countries; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (4) the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of all the Management Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 Committees concerned, June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1253/ 2 1999 ( ), and in particular Article 13 thereof and the corre- HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: sponding provisions of the other regulations on the common organisation of markets in agricultural products, Article 1 Whereas: Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 is amended as follows: (1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (3), as last 1. In the second sentence of Article 1, the word ‘Annex’ is amended by Regulation (EC) No 1230/1999 (4), estab- replaced by ‘Annex I’. lishes, on the basis of the Combined Nomenclature, an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds; 2. The following Article 3a is added: ‘Article 3a (2) to facilitate the electronic transmission of the data and so reduce costs, the regulations fixing the export refunds The destinations or stable groupings of countries common for each sector should be presented in a more uniform to several market organisations are codified and listed in manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa=Regional Industrial Review African Preparatory Conference for the World Summit on Sustainable Development Nairobi, 15-18 October 2001 UNID9 UNEP
    AM - UNEP African Industrial Workshop Africa=Regional Industrial review African Preparatory Conference for the World Summit on Sustainable development Nairobi, 15-18 October 2001 UNID9 UNEP African Preparatory Conference for the World Summit on Sustainable Development Nairobi, 15-18 October 2001 African Industrial Workshop Africa—Regional Industrial Review 1(0128125 120202 Preface There have been many responses to Agenda 21 and the widespread dissemination of the concept of sustainable development, some of which may not have been expected. The word "sustainability" has been introduced into everyday conversation, but is often used without thought as to its recent history, context and meaning. The passing of a decade since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, provides an opportunity to reflect on the irreversible changes that have occurred within industry and in the regulatory climate within which it operates. This report, prepared for UNEP/UNIDO by Professor C.A. Buckley of the Pollution Research Group of the School of Chemical Engineering at the University of Natal in Durban, South Africa, serves to record some of the major events and changes that have occurred in Africa since UNCED. It also serves to record visions for the future in order to provide a platform for debate and discussion on the way ahead. In 1992, there was a vision and a desire to strive for sustainable development. There were goals and there were challenges, but each region had to define its own way forward. During the next 10 years, the lessons of the past must be learned, and diligence and thoughtfulness must characterize our endeavours.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality
    WPS6371 Policy Research Working Paper 6371 Public Disclosure Authorized Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality An Overview Public Disclosure Authorized Mayra Buvinic Monica Das Gupta Ursula Casabonne Philip Verwimp Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Development Economics Vice Presidency Partnerships, Capacity Building Unit February 2013 Policy Research Working Paper 6371 Abstract Violent conflict, a pervasive feature of the recent global is disproportionately borne by males, whereas women landscape, has lasting impacts on human capital, and children constitute a majority of refugees and the and these impacts are seldom gender neutral. Death displaced. Indirect war impacts on health are more and destruction alter the structure and dynamics of equally distributed between the genders. Conflicts create households, including their demographic profiles and households headed by widows who can be especially traditional gender roles. To date, attention to the gender vulnerable to intergenerational poverty. Second-round impacts of conflict has focused almost exclusively on impacts can provide opportunities for women in work sexual and gender-based violence. The authors show that and politics triggered by the absence of men. Households a far wider set of gender issues must be considered to adapt to conflict with changes in marriage and fertility, better document the human consequences of war and migration, investments in children’s health and schooling, to design effective postconflict policies. The emerging and the distribution of labor between the genders. The empirical evidence is organized using a framework that impacts of conflict are heterogeneous and can either identifies both the differential impacts of violent conflict increase or decrease preexisting gender inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Candonga, Governmentality and Corruption in Post-Conflict Luanda
    The informal city: Candonga, governmentality and corruption in post-conflict Luanda Pétur Waldorff Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada August 2014 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Copyright Pétur Waldorff 2014. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................. iv Glossary ............................................................................................................................... v Accronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................... xiv Abstract ............................................................................................................................ xvii Sommaire ......................................................................................................................... xix Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... xxi Chapter 1. Introduction: Luanda, a City of Contrasts .......................................................... 1 1.1 Luanda and its Musseques ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Prison Population List Eleventh Edition Roy Walmsley
    World Prison Population List eleventh edition Roy Walmsley Introduction This eleventh edition of the World Prison Population List gives details of the number of prisoners held in 223 prison systems in independent countries and dependent territories. It shows the differences in the levels of imprisonment across the world and makes possible an estimate of the world prison population total. The figures include both pre-trial detainees/remand prisoners and those who have been convicted and sentenced. The information is the latest available at the end of October 2015. The data are presented in two parts. Part one, tables 1-5, sets out prison population totals, rates and trends for each individual country. Part two, tables 6-8, provides data on prison population totals, rates and trends by continent, and includes comparison of male and female prison population levels. The World Prison Population List*, like the World Female Imprisonment List (the third edition of which was published in September 2015) and the World Pre-trial/ Remand Imprisonment List (second edition published in 2014) complement the information held on the World Prison Brief. This is an online database available at www.prisonstudies.org, and is updated monthly. The World Prison Population List is compiled from a variety of sources. In almost all cases the original source is the national prison administration of the country concerned, or else the Ministry responsible for the prison administration. Most of the figures are recent and efforts are continually made to update them and to obtain information on the number of prisoners in the countries on which figures are not currently available (Eritrea, Somalia and the Democratic People’s Republic of (North) Korea) or are incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Case Studies in East Africa
    Combatting Antivaccination Rumours: Lessons Learned From Case Studies In East Africa EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA REGIONAL OFFICE UNITED NATIONS CHILDRENS FUND NAIROBI, KENYA TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword and Lessons Learned 3 Uganda 13 Kenya 32 Tanzania 39 Annex I: The Rumour Campaign against TT in the Philippines 51 Annex II: The Failed Attacks on Polio NIDs, Kinshasa And Measles NIDs, Uganda 53 Annex III: Sources and Notes 56 Annex IV: Press Coverage of the Anti-OPV Campaign, Nigeria, 2003 71 Anti-Vaccination Rumour Campaigns in 7Eastern Africa - UNICEF Foreword The Genesis of Antivaccination Rumours The Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI), set up in 1974, has been one of the largest and best documented public health programmes in history. The present report seeks to fill a gap on the EPI bookshelf by documenting an underreported phenomenon in developing countries, namely, the rise of antivaccination campaigns mounted against vaccination. The vaccination programmes of recent decades have, to a certain extent, been the victims of their success. As morbidity and mortality have declined, so, too, has the African public’s perception of the importance of some vaccine preventable diseases (measles is a notable exception). Fears of side effects and rumours of long term repercussions of vaccination, never entirely absent, have surfaced as vaccination programmes have matured and approached their goals of polio eradication and tetanus elimination. The near disappearance of some EPI target diseases, especially polio and, in some countries, tetanus, has raised the quite natural question “Why vaccinate?” This question has arisen just as political and religious forces opposed to government have a new tool, in the Internet, to provide support to their allegations against vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Aspects of Community Involvement in Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern and Southern Africa
    ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA Hezron Mogaka, Gacheke Simons, Jane Turpie, Lucy Emerton and Francis Karanja March 2001 This publication, and the research upon which it is based, was made possible by a grant funded under the Forestry Research Programme of the United Kingdom Department for International Development for the benefit of developing countries. Project Number R7477/ZF0114: Community involvement in forest management: an analysis of key opportunities and constraints to the responsible involvement of communities and rural people. The findings, interpretations and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and participants at the workshop. They do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, NRI or DFID. Published by: IUCN — The World Conservation Union Copyright: © 2001, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non- commercial purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder, providing the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of the publication for resale or for other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. Citation: H. Mogaka, G. Simons, J. Turpie, L. Emerton and F. Karanja, Economic Aspects of Community Involvement in Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern and Southern Africa. IUCN — The World Conservation Union, Eastern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi ISBN: Produced by: IUCN — The World Conservation Union, Eastern Africa Regional Office Available from: IUCN Eastern Africa Regional Office, PO Box 68200, Nairobi, KENYA Tel: ++254 2 890 605-12 Fax: ++254 2 890 615/407 Email: [email protected] POLICY BRIEF POLICY BRIEF This study investigates the extent to which communities have been provided with economic incentives to become involved in sustainable forest management in Eastern and Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality: an Overview1
    1 H i C N Households in Conflict Network The Institute of Development Studies - at the University of Sussex - Falmer - Brighton - BN1 9RE www.hicn.org Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality: An Overview1 2 3 4 5 Mayra Buvinic , Monica Das Gupta , Ursula Casabonne , and Philip Verwimp HiCN Working Paper 129 October 2012 Abstract: Violent conflict, a pervasive feature of the recent global landscape, has lasting impacts on human capital, and these impacts are seldom gender neutral. Death and destruction alter the structure and dynamics of households, including their demographic profiles and traditional gender roles. To date, attention to the gender impacts of conflict has focused almost exclusively on sexual and gender-based violence. We show that a far wider set of gender issues must be considered to better document the human consequences of war and to design effective postconflict policies. The emerging empirical evidence is organized using a framework that identifies both the differential impacts of violent conflict on males and females (first-round impacts) and the role of gender inequality in framing adaptive responses to conflict (second- round impacts). War’s mortality burden is disproportionately borne by males, whereas women and children constitute a majority of refugees and the displaced. Indirect war impacts on health are more equally distributed between the genders. Conflicts create households headed by widows who can be especially vulnerable to intergenerational poverty. Second-round impacts can provide opportunities for women in work and politics triggered by the absence of men. Households adapt to conflict with changes in marriage and fertility, migration, investments in children’s health and schooling, and the distribution of labor between the genders.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Political and Security Affairs
    Part 1 Political and Security Affairs Regional Issues Middle East Situation in the Middle East The 53rd General Assembly, like its predecessor, failed to adopt a positive resolution expressing support for the achievements of the peace process and calling for international support for the economic and social development of the Palestinian people. The draft resolution was with- drawn by the cosponsors after agreement could not be reached on contro- versial proposed changes to the text. The United States continued to oppose a number of perennial reso- lutions on the Middle East (the Syrian Golan, Question of Palestine, Israeli Settlements, Palestinian Right to Self-Determination, and Israeli Prac- tices). The United States opposes these resolutions because they address permanent status issues that are the subject of negotiations between the parties; they advocate activities or language incompatible with basic prin- ciples of the Middle East peace process; and/or they expend resources that could be used in more productive ways to improve the lives of the Pales- tinian people. UN Interim Force in Lebanon The UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was established by Secu- rity Council Resolution 425 in March 1978 in response to an Israeli opera- tion in southern Lebanon which, in turn, had followed an attack inside Israel by the Palestine Liberation Organization. UNIFIL was deployed in southern Lebanon and, at the end of the year, had a troop strength of 4,475. The Security Council extended the UNIFIL mandate for six-month periods twice in 1998, most recently by Security Council Resolution 1188 on July 30, 1998. UN Disengagement Observer Force The UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) was established after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war to supervise the disengagement of Israeli and Syrian forces on the Golan Heights in accordance with the U.S.-nego- tiated Israeli-Syrian agreement of May 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ambivalence of the Sacred" in Africa
    GIGA Research Programme: Violence, Power and Security ___________________________ The ‘Ambivalence of the Sacred’ in Africa: The Impact of Religion on Peace and Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa Matthias Basedau and Alexander De Juan N° 70 March 2008 www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers GIGA WP 70/2008 GIGA Working Papers Edited by the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies / Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien. The Working Paper Series serves to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior to publication in order to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. Inclusion of a paper in the Working Paper Series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. When Working Papers are eventually accepted by or published in a journal or book, the correct citation reference and, if possible, the corresponding link will then be in- cluded in the Working Papers website at <www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers>. GIGA research unit responsible for this issue: Research Programme: “Violence, Power and Security” Editor of the GIGA Working Paper Series: Anja Zorob <[email protected]> Copyright for this issue: © Matthias Basedau and Alexander De Juan English copy editor: Melissa Nelson Editorial assistant and production: Vera Rathje All GIGA Working Papers are available online and free of charge on the website: www. giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers. Working Papers can also be ordered in print. For pro- duction and mailing a cover fee of € 5 is charged.
    [Show full text]