DOCSLIB.ORG

1999 Instructions for 8804

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1999 Instructions for 8804 Department of the Treasury 1999 Internal Revenue Service Instructions for Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813 Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted. Paperwork Reduction Act Notice. We ask for the information on these forms to carry partner in any tax year must file Forms out the Internal Revenue laws of the United States. You are required to give us the 8804 and 8805 whether or not information. We need it to ensure that you are complying with these laws and to allow distributions were made during the us to figure and collect the right amount of tax. partnership's tax year. The partnership You are not required to provide the information requested on a form that is subject may designate a person to file the forms. to the Paperwork Reduction Act unless the form displays a valid OMB control number. The partnership, or person it designates, Books or records relating to a form or its instructions must be retained as long as their must file these forms even if the contents may become material in the administration of any Internal Revenue law. partnership has no withholding tax liability Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential, as required by section under section 1446. 6103. Publicly traded partnerships must file The time needed to complete and file these forms will vary depending on individual these forms only if they have elected to circumstances. The estimated average times are: pay section 1446 withholding tax based on effectively connected taxable income Form 8804 8805 8813 allocable to its foreign partners. Those that do not make this election and instead Recordkeeping 59 min. 59 min. 26 min. withhold the tax on distributions to their Learning about the foreign partners should see Publicly law or the form 57 min. 54 min. 49 min. Traded Partnerships on page 4. Preparing the form 31 min. 17 min. 16 min. When To File Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS 20 min. 17 min. 10 min. Forms 8804 and 8805 If you have comments concerning the accuracy of these time estimates or Generally, file on or before the 15th day suggestions for making these forms simpler, we would be happy to hear from you. You of the 4th month following the close of the can write to the Tax Forms Committee, Western Area Distribution Center, Rancho partnership's tax year. However, a Cordova, CA 95743-0001. DO NOT send the tax forms to this address. Instead, see partnership that consists entirely of Where To File below. nonresident alien partners must file on or before the 15th day of the 6th month following the close of the partnership's tax Photographs of Missing effectively connected taxable income and year. Children the total tax credit allowed to the foreign File Forms 8804 and 8805 separately partner for the partnership's tax year. from Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return The Internal Revenue Service is a proud File a separate Form 8805 for each of Income, and Form 1065-B, U.S. Return partner with the National Center for foreign partner even if no section 1446 of Income for Electing Large Partnerships. Missing and Exploited Children. withholding tax was paid. Attach Copy A If you need more time, you may file Photographs of missing children selected of each Form 8805 to the Form 8804 filed Form 2758, Application for Extension of by the Center may appear in instructions with the IRS. Time To File Certain Excise, Income, on pages that would otherwise be blank. Foreign partners must attach Form Information, and Other Returns, to You can help bring these children home 8805 to their U.S. income tax returns to request an extension of time to file Form by looking at the photographs and calling claim a credit for their shares of the 8804. Generally, an extension will not be 1-800-THE-LOST (1-800-843-5678) if you section 1446 tax withheld by the granted for more than 90 days. If you recognize a child. partnership. A foreign partnership that need more time, file a second Form 2758 receives a Form 8805 should see Tiered for an additional 90-day extension. The General Instructions Partnerships on page 4. Any U.S. total extension may not be for more than person erroneously subjected to the 6 months except for taxpayers who are Purpose of Forms withholding tax would also receive Form abroad. 8805 from a partnership and should Use Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813 to pay attach it to his or her income tax return. Form 8813 and report section 1446 withholding tax Use Form 8813, Partnership File on or before the 15th day of the 4th, based on effectively connected taxable Withholding Tax Payment (Section 1446), 6th, 9th, and 12th months of the income allocable to foreign partners. to pay the withholding tax under section partnership's tax year for U.S. income tax Use Form 8804, Annual Return for 1446 to the United States Treasury. Form purposes. Partnership Withholding Tax (Section 8813 must accompany each payment of 1446), to report the total liability under section 1446 tax made during the Where To File section 1446 for the partnership's tax partnership's tax year. year. Form 8804 is also a transmittal form File Forms 8804, 8805, and 8813 with: for Form(s) 8805. Who Must File Internal Revenue Service Center, Use Form 8805, Foreign Partner's Philadelphia, PA 19255. Information Statement of Section 1446 All partnerships with effectively connected Withholding Tax, to show the amount of gross income allocable to a foreign Cat. No. 10393W Taxpayer Identifying Number withholding. If a partnership relies in good a properly executed power of attorney, faith on the certification, but it is later provided the power of attorney To insure proper crediting of the determined that the certification was false, accompanies the certification. withholding tax when reporting to the IRS, the partnership will not be held liable for How long to keep the certifications. A a partnership must provide a U.S. payment of the tax, any applicable partnership must keep a certification of taxpayer identifying number (TIN) for penalties, or interest. A certification that nonforeign status until the end of the 5th each foreign partner. The partnership satisfies the requirements of these tax year after the last tax year in which the should notify any of its foreign partners instructions will also satisfy the partnership relied on the certification. without such a number of the necessity requirements for a certificate of Special rule for widely held of obtaining a U.S. identifying number. nonforeign status under section 1445. partnership. In addition to relying on a An individual's identifying number is the Once a partnership learns that the certification of nonforeign status, a widely individual's social security number (SSN) certification is false, it will no longer be held partnership (a partnership that has or individual taxpayer identification entitled to rely on that certification. For more than 200 partners, including a number (ITIN). Any other partner's this purpose, the knowledge of any publicly traded partnership) may rely on identifying number is its U.S. employer general partner will be imputed to the the information provided to it by partners identification number (EIN). partnership to cause a withholding on a Form 1001, Ownership, Exemption, Certain aliens who cannot obtain SSNs liability. The knowledge of one of its or Reduced Rate Certificate; Form W-8, can now apply for ITINs on Form W-7, limited partners will not be imputed to a Certificate of Foreign Status; Form Application for IRS Individual Taxpayer partnership based solely on that partner's W-8BEN, Certificate of Foreign Status of Identification Number. status as a limited partner. For a limited Beneficial Owner for United States Tax liability company or other entity classified Withholding; or Form W-9, Request for Requirement To Make as a partnership for Federal income tax Taxpayer Identification Number and Withholding Tax Payments purposes, any member with authority to Certification. manage or bind the entity is treated as a Also, a widely held partnership may rely A foreign or domestic partnership that has general partner. on a certification under penalties of effectively connected taxable income Also, the partnership will be liable under perjury from a nominee about the allocable to a foreign partner must pay a section 1461 for any failure to pay the nonforeign status of partners owning withholding tax equal to the applicable withholding tax under section 1446 for the partnership interests through the percentage of the effectively connected tax year in which it learned that the nominee. No particular form is required for taxable income that is allocable to its certification is false. However, the this certification, but it should identify the foreign partners. However, this partnership will not be liable for penalties partner for whom the certification is made requirement does not apply to a for failure to make timely payments of and indicate the basis for the certification. partnership treated as a corporation under installments of section 1446 withholding When making a certification, a nominee the general rule of section 7704(a). tax that were due prior to the time it may also rely on a certification of Effectively connected taxable income is learned that the certification was false. nonforeign status or on information defined on page 3. Duration of certification. A partnership provided by Forms 1001, W-8, W-8BEN may rely on a partner's certification of or W-9. A nominee and a partnership may Withholding Agents nonforeign status until the earliest of the not rely on any of those forms after the General partners and limited liability following: date that the forms must be re-executed, company members are jointly and 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us. Contenu archivé L'information archivée sur le Web est disponible à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de dossiers seulement. Elle n’a été ni modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date d’archivage. Les pages archivées sur le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique de communication du gouvernement du Canada, vous pouvez obtenir cette information dans un format de rechange en communiquant avec nous. The Future of Peace Support Operations Paper Submitted to the ISROP Programme at the Department of Foreign Affairs, Canada March 2003 By Jane Boulden Introduction The purpose of this paper is to examine the evolution of peace support operations since the end of the Cold War and on that basis to discuss the possible form future operations might take and the context in which they might be carried out. To do this the paper has five sections. The first section provides background by briefly describing the provisions for peace support in the United Nations Charter, and the nature of the Cold War experience in peace support. In the second section the paper outlines the evolving nature of peace support operations by first tracing the changing nature of peace support operations in the post-Cold War era, and then discussing the accompanying changes in the approach to peace support – the way in which peace support was pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 12. 1999 L 316/32
    L 316/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 12. 1999 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2605/1999 of 9 December 1999 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, between the Member States. Sectoral regulations may also contain codes for groupings of countries; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (4) the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of all the Management Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 Committees concerned, June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1253/ 2 1999 ( ), and in particular Article 13 thereof and the corre- HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: sponding provisions of the other regulations on the common organisation of markets in agricultural products, Article 1 Whereas: Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 is amended as follows: (1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (3), as last 1. In the second sentence of Article 1, the word ‘Annex’ is amended by Regulation (EC) No 1230/1999 (4), estab- replaced by ‘Annex I’. lishes, on the basis of the Combined Nomenclature, an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds; 2. The following Article 3a is added: ‘Article 3a (2) to facilitate the electronic transmission of the data and so reduce costs, the regulations fixing the export refunds The destinations or stable groupings of countries common for each sector should be presented in a more uniform to several market organisations are codified and listed in manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa=Regional Industrial Review African Preparatory Conference for the World Summit on Sustainable Development Nairobi, 15-18 October 2001 UNID9 UNEP
    AM - UNEP African Industrial Workshop Africa=Regional Industrial review African Preparatory Conference for the World Summit on Sustainable development Nairobi, 15-18 October 2001 UNID9 UNEP African Preparatory Conference for the World Summit on Sustainable Development Nairobi, 15-18 October 2001 African Industrial Workshop Africa—Regional Industrial Review 1(0128125 120202 Preface There have been many responses to Agenda 21 and the widespread dissemination of the concept of sustainable development, some of which may not have been expected. The word "sustainability" has been introduced into everyday conversation, but is often used without thought as to its recent history, context and meaning. The passing of a decade since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, provides an opportunity to reflect on the irreversible changes that have occurred within industry and in the regulatory climate within which it operates. This report, prepared for UNEP/UNIDO by Professor C.A. Buckley of the Pollution Research Group of the School of Chemical Engineering at the University of Natal in Durban, South Africa, serves to record some of the major events and changes that have occurred in Africa since UNCED. It also serves to record visions for the future in order to provide a platform for debate and discussion on the way ahead. In 1992, there was a vision and a desire to strive for sustainable development. There were goals and there were challenges, but each region had to define its own way forward. During the next 10 years, the lessons of the past must be learned, and diligence and thoughtfulness must characterize our endeavours.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality
    WPS6371 Policy Research Working Paper 6371 Public Disclosure Authorized Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality An Overview Public Disclosure Authorized Mayra Buvinic Monica Das Gupta Ursula Casabonne Philip Verwimp Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Development Economics Vice Presidency Partnerships, Capacity Building Unit February 2013 Policy Research Working Paper 6371 Abstract Violent conflict, a pervasive feature of the recent global is disproportionately borne by males, whereas women landscape, has lasting impacts on human capital, and children constitute a majority of refugees and the and these impacts are seldom gender neutral. Death displaced. Indirect war impacts on health are more and destruction alter the structure and dynamics of equally distributed between the genders. Conflicts create households, including their demographic profiles and households headed by widows who can be especially traditional gender roles. To date, attention to the gender vulnerable to intergenerational poverty. Second-round impacts of conflict has focused almost exclusively on impacts can provide opportunities for women in work sexual and gender-based violence. The authors show that and politics triggered by the absence of men. Households a far wider set of gender issues must be considered to adapt to conflict with changes in marriage and fertility, better document the human consequences of war and migration, investments in children’s health and schooling, to design effective postconflict policies. The emerging and the distribution of labor between the genders. The empirical evidence is organized using a framework that impacts of conflict are heterogeneous and can either identifies both the differential impacts of violent conflict increase or decrease preexisting gender inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Candonga, Governmentality and Corruption in Post-Conflict Luanda
    The informal city: Candonga, governmentality and corruption in post-conflict Luanda Pétur Waldorff Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada August 2014 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Copyright Pétur Waldorff 2014. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................. iv Glossary ............................................................................................................................... v Accronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................... xiv Abstract ............................................................................................................................ xvii Sommaire ......................................................................................................................... xix Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... xxi Chapter 1. Introduction: Luanda, a City of Contrasts .......................................................... 1 1.1 Luanda and its Musseques ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Instructions 3520
    Department of the Treasury 1999 Internal Revenue Service Instructions for Form 3520 Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted. Contents Page Complete the first part of page 1 and the relevant General Instructions .................. 1 portions of Part I. See the instructions for Part I. 2. You are a U.S. person who, during the current tax Purpose of Form ..................... 1 year, is treated as the owner of any part of the assets of Who Must File ....................... 1 a foreign trust under the grantor trust rules. When and Where To File ................ 2 Complete the first part of page 1 and Part II. See the Joint Returns ....................... 2 instructions for Part II. Inconsistent Treatment of Items ............. 2 3. You are a U.S. person who, during the current tax year, received a distribution from a foreign trust, or a Definitions ........................2–4 related foreign trust held an outstanding obligation issued Penalties .......................... 4 by you (or a person related to you) that you treated as a Who Must Sign ...................... 5 qualified obligation (defined on page 3) during the current tax year. Specific Instructions .................. 5 Complete the first part of page 1 and Part III. See the Period Covered ...................... 5 instructions for Part III. Identification Numbers and Addresses ......... 5 4. You are a U.S. person who, during the current tax Item A ........................... 5 year, received either: Part I ............................ 5 a. More than $100,000 from a nonresident alien individual or a foreign estate (including foreign persons Schedule A .......................
    [Show full text]
  • World Prison Population List Eleventh Edition Roy Walmsley
    World Prison Population List eleventh edition Roy Walmsley Introduction This eleventh edition of the World Prison Population List gives details of the number of prisoners held in 223 prison systems in independent countries and dependent territories. It shows the differences in the levels of imprisonment across the world and makes possible an estimate of the world prison population total. The figures include both pre-trial detainees/remand prisoners and those who have been convicted and sentenced. The information is the latest available at the end of October 2015. The data are presented in two parts. Part one, tables 1-5, sets out prison population totals, rates and trends for each individual country. Part two, tables 6-8, provides data on prison population totals, rates and trends by continent, and includes comparison of male and female prison population levels. The World Prison Population List*, like the World Female Imprisonment List (the third edition of which was published in September 2015) and the World Pre-trial/ Remand Imprisonment List (second edition published in 2014) complement the information held on the World Prison Brief. This is an online database available at www.prisonstudies.org, and is updated monthly. The World Prison Population List is compiled from a variety of sources. In almost all cases the original source is the national prison administration of the country concerned, or else the Ministry responsible for the prison administration. Most of the figures are recent and efforts are continually made to update them and to obtain information on the number of prisoners in the countries on which figures are not currently available (Eritrea, Somalia and the Democratic People’s Republic of (North) Korea) or are incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Case Studies in East Africa
    Combatting Antivaccination Rumours: Lessons Learned From Case Studies In East Africa EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA REGIONAL OFFICE UNITED NATIONS CHILDRENS FUND NAIROBI, KENYA TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword and Lessons Learned 3 Uganda 13 Kenya 32 Tanzania 39 Annex I: The Rumour Campaign against TT in the Philippines 51 Annex II: The Failed Attacks on Polio NIDs, Kinshasa And Measles NIDs, Uganda 53 Annex III: Sources and Notes 56 Annex IV: Press Coverage of the Anti-OPV Campaign, Nigeria, 2003 71 Anti-Vaccination Rumour Campaigns in 7Eastern Africa - UNICEF Foreword The Genesis of Antivaccination Rumours The Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI), set up in 1974, has been one of the largest and best documented public health programmes in history. The present report seeks to fill a gap on the EPI bookshelf by documenting an underreported phenomenon in developing countries, namely, the rise of antivaccination campaigns mounted against vaccination. The vaccination programmes of recent decades have, to a certain extent, been the victims of their success. As morbidity and mortality have declined, so, too, has the African public’s perception of the importance of some vaccine preventable diseases (measles is a notable exception). Fears of side effects and rumours of long term repercussions of vaccination, never entirely absent, have surfaced as vaccination programmes have matured and approached their goals of polio eradication and tetanus elimination. The near disappearance of some EPI target diseases, especially polio and, in some countries, tetanus, has raised the quite natural question “Why vaccinate?” This question has arisen just as political and religious forces opposed to government have a new tool, in the Internet, to provide support to their allegations against vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Aspects of Community Involvement in Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern and Southern Africa
    ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA Hezron Mogaka, Gacheke Simons, Jane Turpie, Lucy Emerton and Francis Karanja March 2001 This publication, and the research upon which it is based, was made possible by a grant funded under the Forestry Research Programme of the United Kingdom Department for International Development for the benefit of developing countries. Project Number R7477/ZF0114: Community involvement in forest management: an analysis of key opportunities and constraints to the responsible involvement of communities and rural people. The findings, interpretations and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and participants at the workshop. They do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, NRI or DFID. Published by: IUCN — The World Conservation Union Copyright: © 2001, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non- commercial purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder, providing the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of the publication for resale or for other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. Citation: H. Mogaka, G. Simons, J. Turpie, L. Emerton and F. Karanja, Economic Aspects of Community Involvement in Sustainable Forest Management in Eastern and Southern Africa. IUCN — The World Conservation Union, Eastern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi ISBN: Produced by: IUCN — The World Conservation Union, Eastern Africa Regional Office Available from: IUCN Eastern Africa Regional Office, PO Box 68200, Nairobi, KENYA Tel: ++254 2 890 605-12 Fax: ++254 2 890 615/407 Email: [email protected] POLICY BRIEF POLICY BRIEF This study investigates the extent to which communities have been provided with economic incentives to become involved in sustainable forest management in Eastern and Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality: an Overview1
    1 H i C N Households in Conflict Network The Institute of Development Studies - at the University of Sussex - Falmer - Brighton - BN1 9RE www.hicn.org Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality: An Overview1 2 3 4 5 Mayra Buvinic , Monica Das Gupta , Ursula Casabonne , and Philip Verwimp HiCN Working Paper 129 October 2012 Abstract: Violent conflict, a pervasive feature of the recent global landscape, has lasting impacts on human capital, and these impacts are seldom gender neutral. Death and destruction alter the structure and dynamics of households, including their demographic profiles and traditional gender roles. To date, attention to the gender impacts of conflict has focused almost exclusively on sexual and gender-based violence. We show that a far wider set of gender issues must be considered to better document the human consequences of war and to design effective postconflict policies. The emerging empirical evidence is organized using a framework that identifies both the differential impacts of violent conflict on males and females (first-round impacts) and the role of gender inequality in framing adaptive responses to conflict (second- round impacts). War’s mortality burden is disproportionately borne by males, whereas women and children constitute a majority of refugees and the displaced. Indirect war impacts on health are more equally distributed between the genders. Conflicts create households headed by widows who can be especially vulnerable to intergenerational poverty. Second-round impacts can provide opportunities for women in work and politics triggered by the absence of men. Households adapt to conflict with changes in marriage and fertility, migration, investments in children’s health and schooling, and the distribution of labor between the genders.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Political and Security Affairs
    Part 1 Political and Security Affairs Regional Issues Middle East Situation in the Middle East The 53rd General Assembly, like its predecessor, failed to adopt a positive resolution expressing support for the achievements of the peace process and calling for international support for the economic and social development of the Palestinian people. The draft resolution was with- drawn by the cosponsors after agreement could not be reached on contro- versial proposed changes to the text. The United States continued to oppose a number of perennial reso- lutions on the Middle East (the Syrian Golan, Question of Palestine, Israeli Settlements, Palestinian Right to Self-Determination, and Israeli Prac- tices). The United States opposes these resolutions because they address permanent status issues that are the subject of negotiations between the parties; they advocate activities or language incompatible with basic prin- ciples of the Middle East peace process; and/or they expend resources that could be used in more productive ways to improve the lives of the Pales- tinian people. UN Interim Force in Lebanon The UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was established by Secu- rity Council Resolution 425 in March 1978 in response to an Israeli opera- tion in southern Lebanon which, in turn, had followed an attack inside Israel by the Palestine Liberation Organization. UNIFIL was deployed in southern Lebanon and, at the end of the year, had a troop strength of 4,475. The Security Council extended the UNIFIL mandate for six-month periods twice in 1998, most recently by Security Council Resolution 1188 on July 30, 1998. UN Disengagement Observer Force The UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) was established after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war to supervise the disengagement of Israeli and Syrian forces on the Golan Heights in accordance with the U.S.-nego- tiated Israeli-Syrian agreement of May 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ambivalence of the Sacred" in Africa
    GIGA Research Programme: Violence, Power and Security ___________________________ The ‘Ambivalence of the Sacred’ in Africa: The Impact of Religion on Peace and Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa Matthias Basedau and Alexander De Juan N° 70 March 2008 www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers GIGA WP 70/2008 GIGA Working Papers Edited by the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies / Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien. The Working Paper Series serves to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior to publication in order to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. Inclusion of a paper in the Working Paper Series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. When Working Papers are eventually accepted by or published in a journal or book, the correct citation reference and, if possible, the corresponding link will then be in- cluded in the Working Papers website at <www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers>. GIGA research unit responsible for this issue: Research Programme: “Violence, Power and Security” Editor of the GIGA Working Paper Series: Anja Zorob <[email protected]> Copyright for this issue: © Matthias Basedau and Alexander De Juan English copy editor: Melissa Nelson Editorial assistant and production: Vera Rathje All GIGA Working Papers are available online and free of charge on the website: www. giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers. Working Papers can also be ordered in print. For pro- duction and mailing a cover fee of € 5 is charged.
    [Show full text]