Macdiarmid's Poetry and Politics in Montrose

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Macdiarmid's Poetry and Politics in Montrose View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository@Napier ‘Genius in a Provincial Town’: MacDiarmid’s Poetry and Politics in Montrose Scott Lyall In Scottish Studies Review 5.2 (Autumn 2004), 41−55. Focusing on the Scots lyrics of Sangschaw (1925) and Penny Wheep (1926), this article explores the ways in which Christopher Murray Grieve’s activities in Montrose as a journalist with the Montrose Review and as an independent member of the local council helped enable the finding of his artistic voice, Hugh MacDiarmid. Using previously unpublished archival material from the Montrose Review, this article argues that his early modernist poetry in Scots and the radical politics that he pursued both locally and nationally were valuably stimulated by his daily engagement with the Montrose community, principally through his work as a journalist and councillor. The article examines the under-researched area of MacDiarmid’s professional working life, emphasising his vigorous localism during almost a decade in the Angus town in the 1920s. It aims to deepen our sense of a civic commitment to Montrose that facilitated his internationalist vision of an independent Scotland through a dynamic commingling of the local, the national and the universal. The MacDiarmid of Lucky Poet (1943) may have believed himself to be a ‘genius in a provincial town’ while living in Montrose – writing scornfully in A Drunk Man Looks at the Thistle (1926) that his fellow townsfolk ‘continue / To lead their livin’ death’ – but his period there also displays a dedicated striving to serve and radically transform the place in which he wrote much of his best poetry and envisioned a Scottish political and cultural renaissance.1 1 MacDiarmid had two spells in Montrose. He was demobilised from the British army as a non-combatant in 1919 and went to St Andrews where his first wife Peggy was living. From the university town, MacDiarmid found employment as a reporter in Montrose with the local newspaper, the Montrose Review. He left his first stint in Montrose in October 1920 to work as a private tutor at Kildermorie Lodge in Ross and Cromarty. In November 1920, the poet and propagandist of the Scottish renaissance had already begun what Alan Bold calls ‘the first step in a campaign strategically masterminded by Grieve’, publishing a new group of Scottish poets in the first series of the anthology Northern Numbers.2 He also edited and wrote much of the Scottish Chapbook and began working on articles that would later be collected as the controversial Contemporary Scottish Studies (1926), his modernist blast at Scotland’s cultural kailyard. However, aged twenty-eight and married to Peggy, he was tempted back to the Review in April 1921 by the promise of increased wages. His second period in Montrose, which became the focus of the Scottish renaissance, saw MacDiarmid even more surely ‘enter heart and body and soul into a new Scots Nationalist propaganda’ that he had planned as early as October 1916 from ‘somewhere in Macedonia’.3 MacDiarmid’s modernist manifesto for Scottish cultural and political regeneration, ambitiously implemented during the 1920s from the seemingly peripheral setting of Montrose, was mapped out during the First World War. Supposedly fighting for the rights of small nations, the British were also bloodily dealing with the Irish rebels of Easter 1916. MacDiarmid wanted a nationalist movement that would enable Scotland to find its true identity, not as a provincialised handmaiden to the imperialism administered in Ireland, but as an independent nation radically opposed to the metropolitan and capitalist values of the big battalions. 2 Subsequently helping to form the National Party of Scotland in 1928, his important visit that year to Dublin, where he met Éamon de Valera and W.B. Yeats, confirmed his wish for a Celtic confederacy against British imperialism. Inspired by the Irish Republicans to advance the Scottish nationalist cause, MacDiarmid was also radically politicised by the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. In 1920 (the year in which the Communist Party of Great Britain was founded) in his first period in Montrose, C.M. Grieve gave a lecture to the local branch of the Independent Labour Party (ILP) on ‘Lenin – The Man and His Message and Methods’.4 Grieve joined the ILP in 1908 when he was unsuccessfully training to be a teacher in Edinburgh. In 1911 he became a junior reporter with the Edinburgh Evening Dispatch, but his radical journalism didn’t find expression until later the same year with the Monmouthshire Labour News in South Wales. He then worked briefly as a reporter in Clydebank and Renfrew (1912), Cupar (1912) and Forfar (1913), before the war of 1914-18 intervened. MacDiarmid believed his ‘out-and-out Radicalism and Republicanism’ came from his upbringing in small-town Langholm, where he was born in 1892.5 However, it was not until he moved to Montrose in the 1920s that his radical Scottish nationalism found its most propitious place from which to be practiced. Effectively and ingeniously, MacDiarmid’s managed to interrelate his political and cultural activities in Montrose through his occupation as a journalist. The Scots lyric poetry of Sangschaw and Penny Wheep, while not directly political in content, is the creative manifestation of the cultural and political ideas that MacDiarmid propagandised through the pages of various periodicals such as the Scottish Nation and in the Montrose Review. Established in 1811, the Montrose Review is one of the oldest weekly newspapers in Scotland. When MacDiarmid worked there this eight- 3 page Liberal newspaper would appear every Friday. Like most provincial papers, it fused mainly local concerns with reports of the most significant national and international events. MacDiarmid’s job was that of editor-reporter. According to Bold, this meant that he ‘wrote most of the contents’.6 Tempting as this may be to believe, the very structure of the Review and indeed all newspapers, wherein particular subject areas are assigned to individuals with the requisite knowledge and experience, makes it unlikely. It would be a surprise if MacDiarmid was found to be the author of the weekly round-up of farming news, ‘Poultry Notes’. The most obvious difficulty in identifying MacDiarmid’s contribution to the Montrose Review is the anonymity of the articles. His hand can only be discerned by what must pass for educated guesswork. As we shall see, the probability of an article being by MacDiarmid centres on its purposiveness and radical ideas. Though one cannot be sure of his authorship, the material cited here from the Review is characteristic of his concerns. As Glen Murray states, ‘The principle of putting controversial and sometimes quite arcane ideas before a wide audience in the columns of a newspaper was one he used repeatedly.’7 MacDiarmid’s journalism substantially aided his industrious push for political and cultural change in Scotland. Throughout 1923, the year Grieve’s first book Annals of the Five Senses was published, the Montrose Review carried syndicated articles from the Scottish Nation, a literary, cultural and political journal devoted to Scottish interests that MacDiarmid helped to establish in that year. Syndicated articles were sold to a number of different publications to be printed simultaneously. This allowed for a larger, non-specialist readership to be reached, multiplying the potential impact of one piece. For MacDiarmid, this was crucial in his propaganda programme for Scottish renaissance. He would struggle to win a wide readership for ideologically 4 nationalist and short-lived intellectual journals such as the Scottish Nation, the Scottish Chapbook and the Northern Review.8 However, by 1928, the polyphonic MacDiarmid claimed that through ‘a special bureau formed for the purpose (in connection with the Scottish Home Rule Movement)’, he was reaching up to forty local weekly newspapers across Scotland by means of syndication.9 He further boosted his nationalist concerns in the Montrose Review by commenting on his own activities in different sections of the newspaper. For instance, in ‘Round the Town’ from 25 May 1923 we have a writer, probably MacDiarmid, congratulating C.M. Grieve on the Scottish Nation: It is inconceivable that Scotsmen and Scotswomen will not welcome their new weekly. By all the tokens, it is assured of such a vigorous measure of support as will give it a long and healthy life and so reward the public spirit and enterprise of its promoters. No one who believes that mind is greater than matter can afford to miss a copy of ‘The Scottish Nation’ – if for nothing else than the fact of its promise of forcing the pace in the strife to compel an unrepresentative Parliament in which an alien, although neighbouring country is a ‘Predominant’ partner to hand over to Scotland her right to manage Scottish affairs in her distinctively Scottish manner.10 Such self-promotion must have been invaluable when launching the Scottish Nation. From a provincial setting, MacDiarmid was aiming to become the voice of a new internationalist Scotland. He also made his radical voice heard in the council chamber of Montrose. MacDiarmid began working for Montrose Town Council on 13 March 1922 on a 5 provisional basis, replacing Councillor James Davidson who had resigned.11 In November of that year, C.M. Grieve sought the votes of the people of Montrose in the Municipal Election with this address in the Montrose Review: Journalism rightly-conceived is a training in the understanding of public affairs and in the formulation and expression of opinion. Journalists have rendered public service to Montrose before. Having been requested to stand for the Town Council, it will be my earnest endeavour, if returned, to worthily follow these precedents. I am opposed to ‘secret diplomacy’ in public affairs.
Recommended publications
  • Walter Scott and the Twentieth-Century Scottish Renaissance Movement
    Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 35 | Issue 1 Article 5 2007 "A very curious emptiness": Walter Scott nda the Twentieth-Century Scottish Renaissance Movement Margery Palmer McCulloch University of Glasgow Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation McCulloch, Margery Palmer (2007) ""A very curious emptiness": Walter Scott nda the Twentieth-Century Scottish Renaissance Movement," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 35: Iss. 1, 44–56. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol35/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Margery Palmer McCulloch "A very curious emptiness": Walter Scott and the Twentieth-Century Scottish Renaissance Movement Edwin Muir's characterization in Scott and Scotland (1936) of "a very cu­ rious emptiness .... behind the wealth of his [Scott's] imagination'" and his re­ lated discussion of what he perceived as the post-Reformation and post-Union split between thought and feeling in Scottish writing have become fixed points in Scottish criticism despite attempts to dislodge them by those convinced of Muir's wrong-headedness.2 In this essay I want to take up more generally the question of twentieth-century interwar views of Walter Scott through a repre­ sentative selection of writers of the period, including Muir, and to suggest pos­ sible reasons for what was often a negative and almost always a perplexed re­ sponse to one of the giants of past Scottish literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Macdiarmid and Sorley Maclean: Modern Makars, Men of Letters
    Hugh MacDiarmid and Sorley MacLean: Modern Makars, Men of Letters by Susan Ruth Wilson B.A., University of Toronto, 1986 M.A., University of Victoria, 1994 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Susan Ruth Wilson, 2007 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Dr. Iain Higgins_(English)__________________________________________ _ Supervisor Dr. Tom Cleary_(English)____________________________________________ Departmental Member Dr. Eric Miller__(English)__________________________________________ __ Departmental Member Dr. Paul Wood_ (History)________________________________________ ____ Outside Member Dr. Ann Dooley_ (Celtic Studies) __________________________________ External Examiner ABSTRACT This dissertation, Hugh MacDiarmid and Sorley MacLean: Modern Makars, Men of Letters, transcribes and annotates 76 letters (65 hitherto unpublished), between MacDiarmid and MacLean. Four additional letters written by MacDiarmid’s second wife, Valda Grieve, to Sorley MacLean have also been included as they shed further light on the relationship which evolved between the two poets over the course of almost fifty years of friendship. These letters from Valda were archived with the unpublished correspondence from MacDiarmid which the Gaelic poet preserved. The critical introduction to the letters examines the significance of these poets’ literary collaboration in relation to the Scottish Renaissance and the Gaelic Literary Revival in Scotland, both movements following Ezra Pound’s Modernist maxim, “Make it new.” The first chapter, “Forging a Friendship”, situates the development of the men’s relationship in iii terms of each writer’s literary career, MacDiarmid already having achieved fame through his early lyrics and with the 1926 publication of A Drunk Man Looks at the Thistle when they first met.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Macdiarmid, Author and Publisher J.T.D
    Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 21 | Issue 1 Article 7 1986 Hugh MacDiarmid, Author and Publisher J.T.D. Hall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Hall, J.T.D. (1986) "Hugh MacDiarmid, Author and Publisher," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 21: Iss. 1. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol21/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J.T.D. Hall Hugh MacDiarmid, Author and Publisher In his volume of autobiography, Lucky Poet, Hugh MacDiarmid declared that at an early age he had decided that his life's work would not follow a conventional pattern and would exist outside the scope of ordinary professional activities: I was very early determined that I would not 'work for money', and that whatever I might have to do to earn my living, I would never devote more of my time and my energies to remunerative work than I did to voluntary and gainless activities, and actes gratuits, in Gide's phrase.1 It is perhaps not surprising that his chosen field was literature. In the same volume, MacDiarmid claimed that a "literary strain" had been struggling to the fore over several generations on both sides of the family. If his home background was thus conducive to literature, he also found ample encouragement in the resources of the local library in Langholm which were available to him, and which he consumed with an omnivorous appetite.2 Early writings were occasionally rewarded by prizes in literary competitions, or accorded the ultimate accolade of publication.3 MacDiarmid's teachers at Broughton School were aware of his great talents, and 54 J.T.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Macdiarmid
    Studies in Scottish Literature Volume 18 | Issue 1 Article 13 1983 The ompletC e MacDiarmid Ruth McQuillan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation McQuillan, Ruth (1983) "The ompC lete MacDiarmid," Studies in Scottish Literature: Vol. 18: Iss. 1. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol18/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you by the Scottish Literature Collections at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in Scottish Literature by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ruth McQuillan The Complete MacDiarmid My first reaction on buying Hugh MacDiarmid's Complete Poems 1 at Christmas 1978 for what now seems the incredibly low price of £15 was one of disappointment. Disappointment first that Dr. Aitken, whom the poet long ago appointed as his "bibliographer and rembrancer," and whom he had chosen to edit in company with Michael Grieve the definitive edition of his published work, had included no bibliographical notes. And secondly disappointment because of the technical defects of Martin Brian & O'Keefe's production. The title-page is creased in the binding (though I am assured other early purchasers were luckier than I); ink is regret­ tably scarce on several pages of the Sangschaw poems, and again in sections of In Memoriam ,James Joyoe; and the type­ setting of the page-heading "Hitherto Uncollected Poems" is not well or spaced. And yet the fly leaf bears the proud boast: "Printed in Scotland by Robert MacLehose & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of a Gaelic World in the Work of Neil M. Gunn and Hugh Macdiarmid
    Paterson, Fiona E. (2020) ‘The Gael Will Come Again’: Reconstruction of a Gaelic world in the work of Neil M. Gunn and Hugh MacDiarmid. MPhil(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/81487/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] ‘The Gael Will Come Again’: Reconstruction of a Gaelic world in the work of Neil M. Gunn and Hugh MacDiarmid Fiona E. Paterson M.A. (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Scottish Literature School of Critical Studies College of Arts University of Glasgow June 2020 Abstract Neil Gunn and Hugh MacDiarmid are popularly linked with regards to the Scottish Literary Renaissance, the nation’s contribution to international modernism, in which they were integral figures. Beyond that, they are broadly considered to have followed different creative paths, Gunn deemed the ‘Highland novelist’ and MacDiarmid the extremist political poet. This thesis presents the argument that whilst their methods and priorities often differed dramatically, the reconstruction of a Gaelic world - the ‘Gaelic Idea’ - was a focus in which the writers shared a similar degree of commitment and similar priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • \223Hugh Macdiarmid\224 Was the Pseudonym Used by the Critic Christ
    Papers on Joyce 5 (1999): 3-13 “A Joyce Tae Prick Ilka Pluke”: Joyce and the Scottish Renaissance DAVID CLARK Universidade da Coruña For the writers of the movement which came to be known as the Scottish Literary Renaissance in the 1920s and 1930s, Joyce, as the most outstanding figure in contemporary Irish letters, stood as an obligatory point of reference. If Joyce greatly influenced writers throughout the world, this influence was doubly felt in small countries like Galicia and Scotland which considered themselves to be historically and culturally linked in some way to Ireland. 1 Irish literature in general marked the ideal state to which the Renaissance writers aspired for Scotland, and Joyce provided the bridge between tradition and modernity which they considered necessary for the regeneration of Scottish culture in the face of the desired political independence. Within such a framework, the novelist Neil Gunn and the poet Hugh MacDiarmid both hailed Joyce as the prototype for a resurgence in Scottish letters, offering at times a distorted perspective of Joyce’s work in order to comply with their wider pragmatic vision. “Hugh MacDiarmid” was the pseudonym used by the critic Christopher Grieve, a literary maverick who thrived on controversy and who represents, without a doubt, the most important figure of Scottish letters that the twentieth century has produced, both for his own massive, heterogeneous, if somewhat erratic, literary output and also for the enormous influence he had on the Scottish writers of his own and of succeeding generations. Grieve had been impressed by the fragments of Ulysses which had been published in the Little Review , edited by Margaret Anderson, from 1918, and had been able to obtain one of Sylvia Beach’s 1,000 copy limited edition of the finished work on publication.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOTTISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE: from HUGH MACDIARMID to TOM LEONARD, EDWIN MORGAN and JAMES ROBERTSON A
    ТEME, г. XLIV, бр. 4, октобар − децембар 2020, стр. 1549−1562 Оригинални научни рад https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME201008093K Примљено: 8. 10. 2020. UDK 821.111'282.3(414).09-1"19" Ревидирана верзија: 5. 12. 2020. Одобрено за штампу: 5. 12. 2020. SCOTTISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE: FROM HUGH MACDIARMID TO TOM LEONARD, EDWIN MORGAN AND JAMES ROBERTSON a Milena Kaličanin University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy, Niš, Serbia [email protected] Abstract The paper deals with the Scottish literary revival that occurred in the 1920s and 1930s. The leading theoretical and artistic figure of this movement was Hugh MacDiarmid, a Scottish poet whose main preoccupation was the role of Scots and Gaelic in shaping modern Scottish identity. Also called the Lallans revival – the term Lallans (Lowlands) having been used by Robert Burns to refer solely to the notion of language, the movement’s main postulates included the strengthened cultural liaisons between Scots and Gaelic (and not Scots and English as was the case until then). In the preface to his influential anthology of Scottish poetry, The Golden Treasury of Scottish Verse (1941), MacDiarmid bluntly stated that the prime aim of Scottish Literary Renaissance was to recharge Scots as a stage in the breakaway from English so that Scottish Gaelic heritage could properly be recaptured and developed. Relying primarily on MacDiarmid’s theoretical insights, it is our purpose to track, explore and describe the Scottish Literary Renaissance’s contemporary echoes. The paper thus focuses on the comparative analysis of Hugh MacDiarmid’s poetry, on the one hand, and the poetry of its contemporary Scottish creative disciples (Tom Leonard, Edwin Morgan and James Robertson).
    [Show full text]
  • The Asymmetry of British Modernism: Hugh Macdiarmid and Wyndham Lewis', Modernist Cultures, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Asymmetry of British Modernism Citation for published version: Thomson, A 2013, 'The Asymmetry of British Modernism: Hugh MacDiarmid and Wyndham Lewis', Modernist Cultures, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 252-271. https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2013.0064 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3366/mod.2013.0064 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Modernist Cultures Publisher Rights Statement: © Thomson, A. (2013). The Asymmetry of British Modernism: Hugh MacDiarmid and Wyndham Lewis. Modernist Cultures, 8(2), 252-271. 10.3366/mod.2013.0064 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 The Asymmetry of British Modernism: Hugh MacDiarmid and Wyndham Lewis Alex Thomson Devolution in the United Kingdom has begun to affect our understanding of modern literary history, if only because the tendency silently to conflate English with British has been made increasingly problematic. This is particularly marked in the case of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Roseanne Watt
    AA MY MINDIN: MOVING THROUGH LOSS IN THE POETIC LITERARY TRADITION OF SHETLAND Roseanne Watt Division of Literature and Languages University of Stirling Scotland UK Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Abstract Shetland literature is often defined by loss – the loss of language, of a way of life, of a place within time itself. Shetland writers have historically responded to this landscape of loss through a stringent need for the preservation of tradition. This thesis is an attempt to understand that response, and to frame my own creative practice in dialogue with this tradition, whilst trying to create something new within it. In particular I will discuss the influence of Norn on this narrative of loss, and how the language came to be framed in death has contributed to this atmosphere of loss and desire for preservation. The Shetland poet Robert Alan Jamieson has written eloquently and insightfully on these matters; as such, the bulk of this thesis is given over to a critical reading of his collections, with a view to understanding his response, and through this coming to an understanding my own. Part of this thesis is creative practice, and the films produced in that regard can be viewed online following instructions contained within; the final part of the thesis is a critical framing of this practice using the framework built by the thesis prior to that point. 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, to my supervisors, Professor Kathleen Jamie and Dr Sarah Neely; your encouragement, knowledge, enthusiasm and kindness over the years has helped me gain confidence in my own abilities as a writer and filmmaker, allowing me to produce work which I am very proud of.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh Macdiarmid in Context
    Hugh MacDiarmid in Context Alan Riach Hugh MacDiarmid died in 1978. I met him three times during the last year of his life, here at Brownsbank, when he was in his mid-80s. He was one of the very great poets of the twentieth century and he brought about enormous and difficult changes in his native country. He came out of the nineteenth century. He was born in the Scottish Borders in 1892. He served in the Royal Army Medical Corps in the First World War. He survived that and was relieved from service suffering from cerebral malaria. He survived that and became a full-time journalist in Scotland, but when his first marriage broke down he suffered extreme psychological alienation and physical breakdown. He survived these. With his second wife and a young son he went to live on the Shetland island of Whalsay, far north of mainland Scotland. Their staple food was mackerel and mushrooms. He survived that, returning to Glasgow during World War II. Surviving that, he and his wife settled in the Borders once again. Throughout his adult life, his voice was raised in protest at injustice and inadequacy everywhere, but especially in Scotland: and so he made a lot of enemies. He was a lyric poet, a satirical poet, a meditative and philosophical poet, and finally an epic poet. He lived in relative poverty for most of his long life. He came out of the nineteenth century – literally. He came out of a world in which certain individual men had taken upon themselves a kind of comprehensive understanding of society, an attempt to understand the workings of the social world in all their complexity: the great Victorian sages, Thomas Carlyle, John Ruskin, Matthew Arnold.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Scotland in Hugh Macdiarmid's Glasgow Poems
    Béatrice Duchateau Université de Bourgogne Urban Scotland in Hugh MacDiarmid’s Glasgow poems Hugh MacDiarmid is nowadays considered to be one of the greatest Scottish poets of the twentieth century. His poems, books and articles paved the way for the Scottish Renaissance and participated in the modernist movement. Although MacDiarmid is sometimes still thought a parochial poet, probably due to the fact that his work on urban pre- dicaments has been largely forgotten, he dealt at length with the city of Glasgow in the 1930s. On the isle of Whalsay (Shetland), in 1934, facing financial difficulties and a nervous breakdown, he “was writing a new long poem, to be titled “The Red Lion”, projected as an urban counter- part to A Drunk Man, dealing with the slums of Glasgow and the whole range of contemporary working class” (Bold, 1990, p. 373). In 2005, the independent Scottish scholar and poet John Manson made new discove- ries about this planned Glasgow sequence: “The Red Lion” was never published in full and it may now be impossible to discover all the constituent parts which were intended and “their proper setting” […]. “In the Slums of Glasgow” and “Nemertes” were published in 1935. “Third Hymn to Lenin” and “The Glass of Pure Water” were both originally seen as “Glasgow” poems and parts of “The Red Lion”. Several poems entitled “Glasgow” and “Glasgow is like the Sea” also belong to the project. (J. Manson, 2005, pp. 123–4) In 2007, John Manson discovered the existence of a typed manuscript entitled “Glasgow 1938” in the University of Delaware Library, USA: it is a 20-page long poem with annotations by MacDiarmid himself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voice of the People Hamish Henderson and Scottish Cultural Politics Corey Gibson Chapter 1
    THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE HAMISH HENDERSON AND SCOTTISH CULTURAL POLITICS COREY GIBSON CHAPTER 1 The Flytings It is perhaps ill-mannered for a visitor to intervene in a debate between two such masters of ‘flyting’ (surely a folk-art in itself) as Mr Henderson and Mr MacDiarmid. (Thomas Crawford, letter to The Scotsman, 25 January 1960) (TAN, p. 99) From late 1959 through to early 1968, Hamish Henderson and Hugh MacDiarmid engaged in a series of public debates on Scottish literature, folk art, and politics that were to become known as their ‘Flytings’. They com- prised three separate disputes: ‘The Honour’d Shade Flyting’ (1959–60), ‘The Folksong Flyting’ (1964), and ‘The 1320 Club Flyting’ (1968). Though other contributors were involved, Henderson and MacDiarmid were the most prom- inent participants, and their particular conflicts provided the debates with their most dynamic and resonant episodes. Other notable parties included academ- ics and authors such as the Marxist literary critic, David Craig; the nationalist, classicist, and poet, Douglas Young; the critic and pioneer of modern Scottish literary studies, Thomas Crawford; the poet, Stewart Conn; and Scots lan- guage poets, Tom Scott and Sydney Goodsir Smith. Yet this series of impas- sioned debates has garnered almost no critical attention.1 Existing material on the ‘Flytings’ comes substantially from those whose remit is simply to survey Henderson’s long and varied career. As such, the ‘Flytings’ are approached, straightforwardly, as the public dimension of his complex relationship with MacDiarmid. The debates have become part of Henderson’s reputation as a ‘folk-hero’ and are seen – like most of Henderson’s creative and critical work – in biographical terms, as context for the political and cultural vision of this ‘father’ of the Scottish folk revival.
    [Show full text]