RR-11: the Chemical and Physical Characterization of Recycled Tire Crumb Rubber

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RR-11: the Chemical and Physical Characterization of Recycled Tire Crumb Rubber NTP RESEARCH REPOrt ON THE CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF RECYCLED TIRE CRUMB RUBBER NTP RR 11 JULY 2019 NTP Research Report on the Chemical and Physical Characterization of Recycled Tire Crumb Rubber Research Report 11 National Toxicology Program July 2019 National Toxicology Program Public Health Service U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ISSN: 2473-4756 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA Chemical and Physical Characterization of Recycled Tire Crumb Rubber Table of Contents About This Report............................................................................................................................v Peer Review .................................................................................................................................. vii Publication Details ....................................................................................................................... viii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................................3 Materials ......................................................................................................................................3 Optical Microscopy .....................................................................................................................3 Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy............................3 Thermogravimetric Analysis .......................................................................................................3 Inorganic Analysis ......................................................................................................................4 Headspace Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis for Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds ......................................................................................4 Estimation of Solvent-Extractable Constituents Fraction ...........................................................5 Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Solvent-Extractable Constituents Fraction ..........................................................................................................5 Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Solvent-Extractable Constituents ........................................................................................................................6 Size Fractionation of Crumb Rubber Lot and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Profiling of Fractions ...................................................................................6 Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy of Crumb Rubber Fractions ........................................7 Bioaccessibility In Vitro .............................................................................................................7 Results ..............................................................................................................................................9 Optical Microscopy .....................................................................................................................9 Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy............................9 Thermogravimetric Analysis .......................................................................................................9 Inorganics Analysis .....................................................................................................................9 Headspace Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis for Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds ....................................................................................10 Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Solvent-Extractable Constituents Fraction ........................................................................................................10 Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Solvent-Extractable Constituents Fraction ........................................................................................................11 Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Crumb Rubber Fractions ...................11 Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy of Crumb Rubber Fractions ......................................13 Bioaccessibility In Vitro ...........................................................................................................13 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................14 References ......................................................................................................................................15 Appendix A. Individual and Mixtures of Standards Procured to Identify Crumb Rubber Constituents ........................................................................................................... A-1 ii Chemical and Physical Characterization of Recycled Tire Crumb Rubber Appendix B. Potential Crumb Rubber Constituents Identified in the Literature and Initial Screening Analyses ................................................................................................B-1 Appendix C. Additional Constituents of Crumb Rubber Identified by Various Techniques ......C-1 Appendix D. Settings Used in XCMS Software ......................................................................... D-1 Appendix E. Bioaccessibility Studies .......................................................................................... E-1 Tables Table 1. Elemental Compositiona (Wt %) of Six Individual Crumb Rubber Grains by Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy .....................................................................................17 Table 2. Estimated Levels of Metals in Crumb Rubber Lota .........................................................17 Table 3. Estimated Levels of Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Crumb Rubber Lot by Headspace GC–MSa ................................................................................18 Table 4. Percent of Extractable Crumb Rubber in Various Solventsa ...........................................19 Table 5. Constituents of Crumb Rubber in Methylene Chloride Extract Identified by GC– MS with High Confidencea ..............................................................................................20 Table 6. Constituents of Crumb Rubber in Ethanolic Extract Identified by LC–MS ....................21 Table 7. Average Estimated Levels of Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Various Crumb Rubber Fractions by Headspace GC–MS ..............................................22 Table 8. Elemental Composition (Wt %) of Crumb Rubber Fractions by Energy Dispersive Spectroscopya ................................................................................................23 Table 9. Estimated Blank Biofluid Concentration (Equivalent μg in Extract per g of Crumb Rubber Extracted)a...............................................................................................24 Table 10. Estimated Bioaccessible Constituent Concentration (μg in Extract per g of Crumb Rubber Extracted)a ............................................................................................26 Figures Figure 1. Representative Optical Micrographs of Two Crumb Rubber Regions ..........................28 Figure 2. Representative Scanning Electron Micrographs of the Cut Surfaces of Four Dissected Crumb Rubber Grains ....................................................................................29 Figure 3. Representative Thermogram from Thermo Gravimetric Analysis of Crumb Rubber ............................................................................................................................30 Figure 4. Comparison of GC–MS Chromatograms at Varying Incubation Temperatures in Headspace GC–MS Analysis: (A) Full Scale (B) Expanded Scale................................31 Figure 5. GC–MS Spectra for Methyl Isobutyl Ketone: (A) Standard Spectrum, (B) Crumb Rubber Sample Spectrum, and (C) Library Spectrum .................................32 Figure 6. Comparison of GC–MS Chromatograms of Crumb Rubber Following Extraction with Various Solvents: (A) Full- and (B) Expanded-Scale Chromatograms, and (C) Blank Solvents .......................................................................34 Figure 7. GC–MS Chromatogram of Crumb Rubber Following Extraction with Water ..............35 Figure 8. GC–MS Spectra for the n-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (6PPD): (A) Standard Spectrum, (B) Crumb Rubber Sample Spectrum, and (C) Library Spectrum .....................................................................................................36 iii Chemical and Physical Characterization of Recycled Tire Crumb Rubber Figure 9. LC–MS Total Ion Chromatograms of Ethanol Extract of Crumb Rubber: Comparison of Blank-Subtracted Extract of Crumb Rubber, (A) Positive Ion Mode and (B) Negative Ion Mode .................................................................................37 Figure 10. Comparison of Headspace GC–MS Chromatograms of Various Crumb Rubber Fractions and Unsieved Bulk Material Following Incubation at 100C:
Recommended publications
  • Bromomethane CAS #: 74-83-9 Revised By: RRD Toxicology Unit Revision Date: August 14, 2015
    CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Chemical Name: Bromomethane CAS #: 74-83-9 Revised By: RRD Toxicology Unit Revision Date: August 14, 2015 (A) Chemical-Physical Properties Part 201 Value Updated Value Reference Source Comments Molecular Weight (g/mol) 94.94 94.94 EPI EXP Physical State at ambient temp Liquid Gas MDEQ Melting Point (˚C) 179 -93.70 EPI EXP Boiling Point (˚C) 3.5 3.50 EPI EXP Solubility (ug/L) 1.45E+7 1.52E+07 EPI EXP Vapor Pressure (mmHg at 25˚C) 1672 1.62E+03 EPI EXP HLC (atm-m³/mol at 25˚C) 1.42E-2 7.34E-03 EPI EXP Log Kow (log P; octanol-water) 1.18 1.19 EPI EXP Koc (organic carbon; L/Kg) 14.5 13.22 EPI EST Ionizing Koc (L/kg) NR NA NA Diffusivity in Air (Di; cm2/s) 0.08 1.00E-01 W9 EST Diffusivity in Water (Dw; cm2/s) 8.0E-6 1.3468E-05 W9 EST CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Bromomethane (74-83-9) Part 201 Value Updated Value Reference Source Comments Soil Water Partition Coefficient NR NR NA NA (Kd; inorganics) Flash Point (˚C) NA 194 PC EXP Lower Explosivity Level (LEL; 0.1 0.1 CRC EXP unit less) Critical Temperature (K) 467.00 EPA2004 EXP Enthalpy of Vaporization 5.71E+03 EPA2004 EXP (cal/mol) Density (g/mL, g/cm3) 1.6755 CRC EXP EMSOFT Flux Residential 2 m 2.69E-05 2.80E-05 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) EMSOFT Flux Residential 5 m 6.53E-05 6.86E-05 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) EMSOFT Flux Nonresidential 2 m 3.83E-05 4.47E-05 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) EMSOFT Flux Nonresidential 5 m 9.24E-05 1.09E-04 EMSOFT EST (mg/day/cm2) 2 CHEMICAL UPDATE WORKSHEET Bromomethane (74-83-9) (B) Toxicity Values/Benchmarks Source/Reference/ Comments/Notes Part 201 Value Updated Value Date /Issues Reference Dose 1.4E-3 2.0E-2 OPP, 2013 (RfD) (mg/kg/day) Rat subchronic Tier 1 Source: Complete gavage study EPA-OPP: (Danse et al., Basis: OPP is the more current than IRIS, PPRTV and ATSDR.
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET Bromomethane (R40 B1) SECTION 1
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Bromomethane (R40 B1) Issue Date: 16.01.2013 Version: 1.0 SDS No.: 000010021848 Last revised date: 02.02.2017 1/17 SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1 Product identifier Product name: Bromomethane (R40 B1) Additional identification Chemical name: Bromomethane Chemical formula: CH3Br INDEX No. 602-002-00-2 CAS-No. 74-83-9 EC No. 200-813-2 REACH Registration No. Not available. 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Identified uses: Industrial and professional. Perform risk assessment prior to use. Using gas alone or in mixtures for the calibration of analysis equipment. Using gas as feedstock in chemical processes. Formulation of mixtures with gas in pressure receptacles. Uses advised against Consumer use. 1.3 Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Supplier Linde Gas GmbH Telephone: +43 50 4273 Carl-von-Linde-Platz 1 A-4651 Stadl-Paura E-mail: [email protected] 1.4 Emergency telephone number: Emergency number Linde: + 43 50 4273 (during business hours), Poisoning Information Center: +43 1 406 43 43 SDS_AT - 000010021848 SAFETY DATA SHEET Bromomethane (R40 B1) Issue Date: 16.01.2013 Version: 1.0 SDS No.: 000010021848 Last revised date: 02.02.2017 2/17 SECTION 2: Hazards identification 2.1 Classification of the substance or mixture Classification according to Directive 67/548/EEC or 1999/45/EC as amended. T; R23/25 Xi; R36/37/38 Xn; R48/20 Muta. 3; R68 N; R50 N; R59 The full text for all R-phrases is displayed in section 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils
    Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils V. I. Babushok,a) P. J. Linstrom, and I. G. Zenkevichb) National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA (Received 1 August 2011; accepted 27 September 2011; published online 29 November 2011) Gas chromatographic retention indices were evaluated for 505 frequently reported plant essential oil components using a large retention index database. Retention data are presented for three types of commonly used stationary phases: dimethyl silicone (nonpolar), dimethyl sili- cone with 5% phenyl groups (slightly polar), and polyethylene glycol (polar) stationary phases. The evaluations are based on the treatment of multiple measurements with the number of data records ranging from about 5 to 800 per compound. Data analysis was limited to temperature programmed conditions. The data reported include the average and median values of retention index with standard deviations and confidence intervals. VC 2011 by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce on behalf of the United States. All rights reserved. [doi:10.1063/1.3653552] Key words: essential oils; gas chromatography; Kova´ts indices; linear indices; retention indices; identification; flavor; olfaction. CONTENTS 1. Introduction The practical applications of plant essential oils are very 1. Introduction................................ 1 diverse. They are used for the production of food, drugs, per- fumes, aromatherapy, and many other applications.1–4 The 2. Retention Indices ........................... 2 need for identification of essential oil components ranges 3. Retention Data Presentation and Discussion . 2 from product quality control to basic research. The identifi- 4. Summary.................................. 45 cation of unknown compounds remains a complex problem, in spite of great progress made in analytical techniques over 5.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) (11) 3,855,105 Diveley (45) Dec
    United States Patent (19) (11) 3,855,105 Diveley (45) Dec. 17, 1974 54 THOPHOSPHORYLATING ASATURATED 3,284,540 1 1/1966 D'Alelio.............................. 260/869 HYDROCARBON GROUP 75 Inventor: William R. Diveley, Oakwood Hills, Primary Examiner-Benjamin R. Padgett Del. Attorney, Agent, or Firm-George H. Hopkins 73 Assignee: Hercules incorporated, Wilmington, (57) ABSTRACT Del. Disclosed is a process for making certain organo thio 22) Filed: June 16, 1969 phosphates and dithiophosphates, a number of which 21 ) Appl. No.: 833,741 have utility as insecticides. The process comprises ef fecting by free radical catalysis at about 0-150°C. re Related U.S. Application Data action of an organic compound characterized by a sat (63) Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 514,652, Dec. 17, urated carbon with at least one hydrogen replaceable 1965, abandoned. under free radical conditions, and halo-thiophosphate of the formula: 52 U.S. C. ..... 204/162 R, 204/158 R, 260/329 R, 260/329 P, 260/340.6, 260/347.2, 260/958, 7, OR . 1 / 260/963, 260/971 X-S-P (51) Int. Cl................................................ B01j 1/10 N 58 Field of Search ............ 204/162, 158; 260/329, OR 260/340.6, 347.2,958, 963,971 wherein X is a halo radical, Z is selected from the (56) References Cited group consisting of the oxo and thioxo radicals, and R UNITED STATES PATENTS and R' are organic radicals. 3,256,370 6/1966 Fitch et al........................... 260/972 24 Claims, No Drawings 3,855, 105 2 THIOPHOSPHORYLATING ASATURATED rated carbons, each of which has one or more hydrogen HYDROCARBON GROUP radicals replaceable under free radical conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy
    Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Introduction Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) is one of the so-called hyphenated analytical techniques. As the name implies, it is actually two techniques that are combined to form a single method of analyzing mixtures of chemicals. Gas chromatography separates the components of a mixture and mass spectroscopy characterizes each of the components individually. By combining the two techniques, an analytical chemist can both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate a solution containing a number of chemicals. Gas Chromatography In general, chromatography is used to separate mixtures of chemicals into individual components. Once isolated, the components can be evaluated individually. In all chromatography, separation occurs when the sample mixture is introduced (injected) into a mobile phase. In liquid chromatography (LC), the mobile phase is a solvent. In gas chromatography (GC), the mobile phase is an inert gas such as helium. The mobile phase carries the sample mixture through what is referred to as a stationary phase. The stationary phase is usually a chemical that can selectively attract components in a sample mixture. The stationary phase is usually contained in a tube of some sort called a column. Columns can be glass or stainless steel of various dimensions. The mixture of compounds in the mobile phase interacts with the stationary phase. Each compound in the mixture interacts at a different rate. Those that interact the fastest will exit (elute from) the column first. Those that interact slowest will exit the column last. By changing characteristics of the mobile phase and the stationary phase, different mixtures of chemicals can be separated.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Pyrolysis of Plastic Wastes for the Production of Liquid Fuels for Engines
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for RSC Advances. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 Supporting information for: Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic wastes for the production of liquid fuels for engines Supattra Budsaereechaia, Andrew J. Huntb and Yuvarat Ngernyen*a aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. E-mail:[email protected] bMaterials Chemistry Research Center, Department of Chemistry and Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand Fig. S1 The process for pelletization of catalyst PS PS+bentonite PP ) t e PP+bentonite s f f o % ( LDPE e c n a t t LDPE+bentonite s i m s n HDPE a r T HDPE+bentonite Gasohol 91 Diesel 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Wavenumber (cm-1) Fig. S2 FTIR spectra of oil from pyrolysis of plastic waste type. Table S1 Compounds in oils (%Area) from the pyrolysis of plastic wastes as detected by GCMS analysis PS PP LDPE HDPE Gasohol 91 Diesel Compound NC C Compound NC C Compound NC C Compound NC C 1- 0 0.15 Pentane 1.13 1.29 n-Hexane 0.71 0.73 n-Hexane 0.65 0.64 Butane, 2- Octane : 0.32 Tetradecene methyl- : 2.60 Toluene 7.93 7.56 Cyclohexane 2.28 2.51 1-Hexene 1.05 1.10 1-Hexene 1.15 1.16 Pentane : 1.95 Nonane : 0.83 Ethylbenzen 15.07 11.29 Heptane, 4- 1.81 1.68 Heptane 1.26 1.35 Heptane 1.22 1.23 Butane, 2,2- Decane : 1.34 e methyl- dimethyl- : 0.47 1-Tridecene 0 0.14 2,2-Dimethyl- 0.63 0 1-Heptene 1.37 1.46 1-Heptene 1.32 1.35 Pentane,
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for 2-Butanone Released for Public Comment in May 2019
    Toxicological Profile for 2-Butanone October 2020 2-BUTANONE ii DISCLAIMER Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2-BUTANONE iii FOREWORD This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with guidelines* developed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The original guidelines were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and republished as necessary. The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances described therein. Each peer-reviewed profile identifies and reviews the key literature that describes a substance's toxicologic properties. Other pertinent literature is also presented, but is described in less detail than the key studies. The profile is not intended to be an exhaustive document; however, more comprehensive sources of specialty information are referenced. The focus of the profiles is on health and toxicologic information; therefore, each toxicological profile begins with a relevance to public health discussion which would allow a public health professional to make a real-time determination of whether the presence of a particular substance in the environment poses a potential threat to human health. The adequacy of information to determine a substance's
    [Show full text]
  • Design for the Environment Toolkit: a Competitive Edge for the Future
    Design for the Environment A Competitive Edge for the Future Toolkit Design for Environment Toolkit(DfE) Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance Minnesota Technical Assistance Program (MnTAP) Table of Contents vAbout the Authors...2 vAcknowledgments...3 vPreface...4 vPart One: Introduction to Design for the Environment (DfE)...6 What is DfE?...6 Why DfE?...10 Success in DfE...12 Implementing DfE...13 vPart Two: DfE Matrices and Questions...17 Explanation of the DfE Matrix System..17 Figure: Product DfE Matrix...18 Instructions For Using the DfE Matrix...19 Interpretation of Results...28 Matrix Questions...20 Definitions...30 vPart Three: Reference Information...32 Index of Hazardous Chemical Pollutants (alphabetical listing)...32 Plastics Environmental Risk Information...57 Figure: Recycling Rates and Commodity Price Information....58 Index of Climate Altering Chemicals...59 Polymers....61 Degradable Polymers - Vendor List...62 Part/Materials Suppliers Environmental Survey...65 Additional Resources...66 Works Cited....68 Summary of References...69 Other Vendor Lists Checklist of Printed Resources for Minnesota Businesses Outlets for Industrial Scrap Pallets Alternative Solvent Degreasers Manufacturers of Aqueous Cleaning Equipment Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Cleaners for Metal Part Degreasing Safer Stripping and Cleaning Chemicals for Coatings and Polymers Page 1 About the Authors Jeremy M. Yarwood - Research Specialist, Minnesota Technical Assistance Program (MnTAP) Mr. Yarwood has previously worked with MnTAP advising Minnesota companies in developing environmentally responsible processes. He received his B.S. Civil (Environmental) Engineering summa cum laude from the University of Minnesota. Mr. Yarwood is currently a graduate fellow in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota and plans to obtain a M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Alteration of Volatile Chemical Composition in Tobacco Plants Due to Green Peach Aphid (Myzus Persicae Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Feeding
    Song et al.: Green peach aphid (Myzus persicae Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding alters volatile composition in tobacco plants - 159 - ALTERATION OF VOLATILE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION IN TOBACCO PLANTS DUE TO GREEN PEACH APHID (MYZUS PERSICAE SULZER) (HEMIPTERA: APHIDIDAE) FEEDING SONG, Y. Z.1,2,3 – GUO, Y. Q.1,2 – CAI, P. M.2,3 – CHEN, W. B.1,2 – LIU, C. M.1,2* 1Biological Control Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China e-mail: [email protected] (Song, Y. Z.); [email protected] (Guo, Y. Q.); [email protected] (Chen, W. B.) 2State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fuzhou 350002, China e-mail: [email protected] (Cai, P. M.) 3Department of Horticulture, College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected]; phone: +86-0591-8378-9420; fax: +86-0591-8378-9421 (Received 10th Jul 2020; accepted 6th Oct 2020) Abstract. In response to insect pest herbivory, plants can generate volatile components that may serve multiple roles as communication signals and defence agents in a multitrophic context. In the present study, the volatile profiles of tobacco plants Nicotiana tabacum L., with and without infestation by sap-sucking aphids Myzus persicae Sulzer, were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results revealed that a total of 10 compounds were identified from healthy tobacco plants, and a total of 14 and 16 compounds were isolated from aphid-infested tobacco plants at 24 and 48 hours after infestation, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules; Heats of Formation of Protonated Molecules
    Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules; Heats of Formation of Protonated Molecules Cite as: Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 13, 695 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555719 Published Online: 15 October 2009 Sharon G. Lias, Joel F. Liebman, and Rhoda D. Levin ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules: An Update Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 27, 413 (1998); https:// doi.org/10.1063/1.556018 Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 5648 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913 A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 154104 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344 Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 13, 695 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555719 13, 695 © 1984 American Institute of Physics for the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules; Heats of Formation of Protonated Molecules Sharon G. Lias Center for Chemical Physics, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Joel F. Liebman Department of Chemistry, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Catonsville, MD 21228 and Rhoda D. Levin Center for Chemical Physics. National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 The available data on gas phase basicities and proton affinities of molecules are compiled and evaluated. Tables giving the molecules ordered (1) according to proton affinity and (2) according to empirical formula, sorted alphabetically are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupling Gas Chromatography to Mass Spectrometry
    Coupling Gas Chromatography to Mass Spectrometry Introduction The suite of gas chromatographic detectors includes (roughly in order from most common to the least): the flame ionization detector (FID), thermal conductivity detector (TCD or hot wire detector), electron capture detector (ECD), photoionization detector (PID), flame photometric detector (FPD), thermionic detector, and a few more unusual or VERY expensive choices like the atomic emission detector (AED) and the ozone- or fluorine-induce chemiluminescence detectors. All of these except the AED produce an electrical signal that varies with the amount of analyte exiting the chromatographic column. The AED does that AND yields the emission spectrum of selected elements in the analytes as well. Another GC detector that is also very expensive but very powerful is a scaled down version of the mass spectrometer. When coupled to a GC the detection system itself is often referred to as the mass selective detector or more simply the mass detector. This powerful analytical technique belongs to the class of hyphenated analytical instrumentation (since each part had a different beginning and can exist independently) and is called gas chromatograhy/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Placed at the end of a capillary column in a manner similar to the other GC detectors, the mass detector is more complicated than, for instance, the FID because of the mass spectrometer's complex requirements for the process of creation, separation, and detection of gas phase ions. A capillary column is required in the chromatograph because the entire MS process must be carried out at very low pressures (~10-5 torr) and in order to meet this requirement a vacuum is maintained via constant pumping using a vacuum pump.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism and Kinetics of Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Synthesis from Acetone Over Ion- Exchanged Hydroxyapatite
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title The mechanism and kinetics of methyl isobutyl ketone synthesis from acetone over ion- exchanged hydroxyapatite Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hq4p42d Authors Ho, CR Zheng, S Shylesh, S et al. Publication Date 2018-09-01 DOI 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.07.005 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Catalysis 365 (2018) 174–183 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Catalysis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcat The mechanism and kinetics of methyl isobutyl ketone synthesis from acetone over ion-exchanged hydroxyapatite ⇑ Christopher R. Ho a,b, Steven Zheng a, Sankaranarayanapillai Shylesh a,b, Alexis T. Bell a,b, a Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1462, United States b Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States article info abstract Article history: The synthesis of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) can be carried out by the condensation of acetone in the Received 9 May 2018 presence of hydrogen over a supported metal catalyst. Previous studies have shown that hydroxyapatite Revised 26 June 2018 is an excellent catalyst for condensation reactions. The present investigation was undertaken in order to Accepted 2 July 2018 elucidate the reaction mechanism and site requirements for acetone coupling to MIBK over a physical Available online 18 July 2018 mixture of hydroxyapatite and Pd/SiO2. The reaction is found to proceed by consecutive aldol addition to form diacetone alcohol (DAA), dehydration of DAA to mesityl oxide (MO), and hydrogenation of MO Keywords: to MIBK.
    [Show full text]