DOCSLIB.ORG

Toxicological Profile for 2-Butanone Released for Public Comment in May 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toxicological Profile for 2-Butanone Released for Public Comment in May 2019 Toxicological Profile for 2-Butanone October 2020 2-BUTANONE ii DISCLAIMER Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2-BUTANONE iii FOREWORD This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with guidelines* developed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The original guidelines were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and republished as necessary. The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances described therein. Each peer-reviewed profile identifies and reviews the key literature that describes a substance's toxicologic properties. Other pertinent literature is also presented, but is described in less detail than the key studies. The profile is not intended to be an exhaustive document; however, more comprehensive sources of specialty information are referenced. The focus of the profiles is on health and toxicologic information; therefore, each toxicological profile begins with a relevance to public health discussion which would allow a public health professional to make a real-time determination of whether the presence of a particular substance in the environment poses a potential threat to human health. The adequacy of information to determine a substance's health effects is described in a health effects summary. Data needs that are of significance to the protection of public health are identified by ATSDR. Each profile includes the following: (A) The examination, summary, and interpretation of available toxicologic information and epidemiologic evaluations on a toxic substance to ascertain the levels of significant human exposure for the substance due to associated acute, intermediate, and chronic exposures; (B) A determination of whether adequate information on the health effects of each substance is available or in the process of development to determine levels of exposure that present a significant risk to human health of acute, intermediate, and chronic health effects; and (C) Where appropriate, identification of toxicologic testing needed to identify the types or levels of exposure that may present significant risk of adverse health effects in humans. The principal audiences for the toxicological profiles are health professionals at the Federal, State, and local levels; interested private sector organizations and groups; and members of the public. This profile reflects ATSDR’s assessment of all relevant toxicologic testing and information that has been peer-reviewed. Staffs of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other Federal scientists have also reviewed the profile. In addition, this profile has been peer-reviewed by a nongovernmental panel and was made available for public review. Final responsibility for the contents and views expressed in this toxicological profile resides with ATSDR. Patrick N. Breysse, Ph.D., CIH Christopher M. Reh, Ph.D. Director, National Center for Environmental Health and Associate Director Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2-BUTANONE iv *Legislative Background The toxicological profiles are developed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA or Superfund). CERCLA section 104(i)(1) directs the Administrator of ATSDR to “…effectuate and implement the health related authorities” of the statute. This includes the preparation of toxicological profiles for hazardous substances most commonly found at facilities on the CERCLA National Priorities List (NPL) and that pose the most significant potential threat to human health, as determined by ATSDR and the EPA. Section 104(i)(3) of CERCLA, as amended, directs the Administrator of ATSDR to prepare a toxicological profile for each substance on the list. In addition, ATSDR has the authority to prepare toxicological profiles for substances not found at sites on the NPL, in an effort to “…establish and maintain inventory of literature, research, and studies on the health effects of toxic substances” under CERCLA Section 104(i)(1)(B), to respond to requests for consultation under section 104(i)(4), and as otherwise necessary to support the site-specific response actions conducted by ATSDR. 2-BUTANONE v VERSION HISTORY Date Description October 2020 Final toxicological profile released May 2019 Draft for public comment toxicological profile released December 2010 Addendum to the toxicological profile released July 1992 Final toxicological profile released 2-BUTANONE vi CONTRIBUTORS & REVIEWERS CHEMICAL MANAGER TEAM G. Daniel Todd, Ph.D. Julie Melia, Ph.D., D.A.B.T. Jenny S. Crisman, B.S. Lisa D. Ingerman, Ph.D., D.A.B.T David W. Wohlers, Ph.D. ATSDR, Office of Innovation and Analytics, SRC, Inc., North Syracuse, NY Toxicology Section, Atlanta, GA REVIEWERS Interagency Minimal Risk Level Workgroup: Includes ATSDR; National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); National Toxicology Program (NTP). Additional reviews for science and/or policy: ATSDR, Office of Community Health and Hazard Assessment; ATSDR, Office of Capacity Development and Applied Prevention Science; ATSDR, Office of Science; NCEH, Division of Laboratory Science; NCEH, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice. PEER REVIEWERS 1. G.A. Shakeel Ansari, Ph.D.; Professor, Department of Pathology; University of Texas Medical Branch; Galveston, Texas 2. F. Peter Guengerich, Ph.D.; Tadashi Inagami Professor of Biochemistry; Department of Biochemistry; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Nashville, Tennessee 3. Dale Hattis, Ph.D.; Research Professor, George Perkins Marsh Institute; Clark University; Worcester, Massachusetts These experts collectively have knowledge of toxicology, chemistry, and/or health effects. All reviewers were selected in conformity with Section 104(I)(13) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended. ATSDR scientists review peer reviewers’ comments and determine whether changes will be made to the profile based on comments. The peer reviewers’ comments and responses to these comments are part of the administrative record for this compound. The listing of peer reviewers should not be understood to imply their approval of the profile's final content. The responsibility for the content of this profile lies with ATSDR. 2-BUTANONE vii CONTENTS DISCLAIMER .............................................................................................................................................. ii FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................... iii VERSION HISTORY ................................................................................................................................... v CONTRIBUTORS & REVIEWERS ........................................................................................................... vi CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ x CHAPTER 1. RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH ................................................................................ 1 1.1 OVERVIEW AND U.S. EXPOSURES ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 SUMMARY OF HEALTH EFFECTS........................................................................................... 1 1.3 MINIMAL RISK LEVELS (MRLs) .............................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 2. HEALTH EFFECTS ........................................................................................................... 10 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 DEATH ........................................................................................................................................ 27 2.3 BODY WEIGHT .......................................................................................................................... 27 2.4 RESPIRATORY .......................................................................................................................... 28 2.5 CARDIOVASCULAR ................................................................................................................. 30 2.6 GASTROINTESTINAL ............................................................................................................... 31 2.7 HEMATOLOGICAL ................................................................................................................... 31 2.8 MUSCULOSKELETAL .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)
    Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 78-93-3 Hazard Summary Methyl ethyl ketone is used as a solvent. Acute (short-term) inhalation exposure to methyl ethyl ketone in humans results in irritation to the eyes, nose, and throat. Limited information is available on the chronic (long-term) effects of methyl ethyl ketone in humans. Chronic inhalation studies in animals have reported slight neurological, liver, kidney, and respiratory effects. No information is available on the developmental, reproductive, or carcinogenic effects of methyl ethyl ketone in humans. Developmental effects, including decreased fetal weight and fetal malformations, have been reported in mice and rats exposed to methyl ethyl ketone via inhalation and ingestion. EPA has classified methyl ethyl ketone as a Group D, not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity. Please Note: The main sources of information for this fact sheet are EPA's Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl Ketone (1) and EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (6), which contains information on inhalation chronic toxicity of methyl ethyl ketone and the RfC and oral chronic toxicity and the RfD. Uses The primary use of methyl ethyl ketone is as a solvent in processes involving gums, resins, cellulose acetate, and cellulose nitrate. (1) Methyl ethyl ketone is also used in the synthetic rubber industry, in the production of paraffin wax, and in household products such as lacquer and varnishes, paint remover, and glues. (1) Sources and Potential Exposure Methyl ethyl ketone has been detected in both indoor and outdoor air. Methyl ethyl ketone can be produced in outdoor air by the photooxidation of certain air pollutants, such as butane and other hydrocarbons.
    [Show full text]
  • Methyl Isopropyl Ketone Safety Data Sheet According to Federal Register / Vol
    Methyl isopropyl ketone Safety Data Sheet according to Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations Date of issue: 05/25/2015 Version: 1.0 SECTION 1: Identification 1.1. Identification Product form : Substance Substance name : Methyl isopropyl ketone CAS-No. : 563-80-4 Product code : (US) W1814 Formula : C5H10O Synonyms : 3-Methylbutane-2-one / Isopropyl methyl ketone / Methyl-2-butanone, 3- / 2-Acetylpropane / 3- Methylbutanone-2 / 3-Methylbutanone / 3-Methylbutan-2-one / 3-Methyl-2-butanone / 2- Butanone, 3-methyl- / Butan-2-one, 3-methyl- 1.2. Recommended use and restrictions on use No additional information available 1.3. S upplie r Synerzine 5340 Hwy 42 S Ellenwood, Georgia 30294 - USA T 404-524-6744 - F 404-577-1651 [email protected] - www.synerzine.com 1.4. Emergency telephone number Emergency number : Infotrac 1-800-535-5053 (Contract# 102471) Dial +1-352-323-3500 when outside the US SECTION 2: Hazard(s) identification 2.1. Classification of the substance or mi xt ure GHS -US classification Flammable liquids Category H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapour 2 Specific target organ toxicity H336 May cause drowsiness or dizziness (single exposure) Category 3 Hazardous to the aquatic H402 Harmful to aquatic life environment - Acute Hazard Category 3 Full text of H statements : see section 16 2.2. GHS Label elements, including precautionary statements GHS-US labeling Hazard pictograms (GHS-US) : Signal word (GHS-US) : Danger Hazard statements (GHS-US) : H225 - Highly flammable liquid and vapour H336 - May cause drowsiness or dizziness H402 - Harmful to aquatic life Precautionary statements (GHS-US) : P210 - Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources.
    [Show full text]
  • References on Use of CO2 for Medical
    Some References on the Use of CO2 for Medical Entomology Survey Becker N et al. Comparison of carbon dioxide, octenol and a host-odour as mosquito attractants in the Upper Rhine Valley, Germany. Med Vet Entomol 1995;9:377-80. Abstract: Field studies were conducted in the Upper Rhine Valley to determine the responses of mosquitoes to CDC traps baited with either CO2, octenol, light or paired combinations of these. Among eight mosquito species caught, the attractant effect on trap catches was studied in the four most abundant: Aedes vexans, Ae. rossicus, Ae. cinereus and Culex pipiens. Traps baited only with light or octenol caught few mosquitoes, whereas many were caught by traps baited with CO2 alone or in combination with either of the other candidate attractants. CO2 baited traps, with or without light, caught the most Aedes. The combination of CO2 and octenol attracted most Cx pipiens, but this apparent synergy was not significant. Using a caged hamster compared to CO2 as bait in a CDC light-trap with only intermittent fan suction, the hamster attracted less mosquitoes than CO2 emitted at a rate of 225 g/h on days 1 and 2, whereas on days 3 and 4 the smell from the hamster's cage became significantly more attractive than this rate of CO2 for all species of mosquitoes. Canyon DV, Hii JL. Efficacy of carbon dioxide, 1-octen-3-ol, and lactic acid in modified Fay- Prince traps as compared to man-landing catch of Aedes aegypti. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1997;13:66-70. Abstract: The attractants 1-octen-3-ol and lactic acid significantly decreased catches of Aedes aegypti in Townsville, Australia, by 50% in a controlled laboratory environment and by 100% in the field when compared to carbon dioxide baited bidirectional Fay-Prince trap catches.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone’ (HEPB)
    SCCS/1582/16 Final version Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety SCCS OPINION ON Ethylzingerone – ‘Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone’ (HEPB) (Cosmetics Europe No P98) The SCCS adopted this Opinion by written procedure on 7 April 2017 SCCS/1582/16 Final Opinion on Ethylzingerone - ‘Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone’ (HEPB) - Cosmetics Europe No P98 About the Scientific Committees Three independent non-food Scientific Committees provide the Commission with the scientific advice it needs when preparing policy and proposals relating to consumer safety, public health and the environment. The Committees also draw the Commission's attention to the new or emerging problems which may pose an actual or potential threat. They are: the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) and the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) and are made up of external experts. In addition, the Commission relies upon the work of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the European Centre for Disease prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). SCCS The Committee shall provide Opinions on questions concerning all types of health and safety risks (notably chemical, biological, mechanical and other physical risks) of non-food consumer products (for example: cosmetic products and their ingredients, toys, textiles, clothing, personal care and household products such as detergents, etc.) and services (for example: tattooing, artificial sun tanning, etc.). Scientific Committee members Ulrike Bernauer, Laurent Bodin, Leonardo Celleno, Qasim Chaudhry, Pieter Jan Coenraads, Maria Dusinska, Janine Ezendam, Eric Gaffet, Corrado Lodovico Galli, Berit Granum, Eirini Panteri, Vera Rogiers, Christophe Rousselle, Maciej Stepnik, Tamara Vanhaecke, Susan Wijnhoven.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Evaluation of Thermochemical Properties of C1–C4 Species; Updated Group-Contributions to Estimate Thermochemical Properties
    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Critical evaluation of thermochemical properties of C-1-C-4 Title species: updated group-contributions to estimate thermochemical properties Author(s) Burke, S. M.; Simmie, J. M.; Curran, Henry J. Publication Date 2015-01-05 Burke, S. M., Simmie, J. M., & Curran, H. J. (2015). Critical Publication evaluation of thermochemical properties of C-1-C-4 species: Information updated group-contributions to estimate thermochemical properties. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 44(1), 013101. Publisher AIP Publishing Link to publisher's http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4902535 version Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6119 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4902535 Downloaded 2021-09-25T06:51:18Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. C1–C4 thermochemical properties: updated group additivity groups Critical evaluation of thermochemical properties of C1–C4 species; updated group-contributions to estimate thermochemical properties. S. M. Burke, J. M. Simmie, and H. J. Currana) Combustion Chemistry Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland (Dated: 26 September 2014) A review of literature enthalpies of formation and molar entropies for alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, hydroperox- ides, and their associated radicals has been compiled and critically evaluated. By comparing literature values the overall uncertainty in thermochemical properties of small hydrocarbons and oxygenated hydrocarbons can be highlighted. In general there is good agreement between heat of formation values in the literature for stable species, however there is greater uncertainty in the values for radical species and for molar entropy values.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism and Kinetics of Methyl Isobutyl Ketone Synthesis from Acetone Over Ion- Exchanged Hydroxyapatite
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title The mechanism and kinetics of methyl isobutyl ketone synthesis from acetone over ion- exchanged hydroxyapatite Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hq4p42d Authors Ho, CR Zheng, S Shylesh, S et al. Publication Date 2018-09-01 DOI 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.07.005 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Catalysis 365 (2018) 174–183 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Catalysis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcat The mechanism and kinetics of methyl isobutyl ketone synthesis from acetone over ion-exchanged hydroxyapatite ⇑ Christopher R. Ho a,b, Steven Zheng a, Sankaranarayanapillai Shylesh a,b, Alexis T. Bell a,b, a Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1462, United States b Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States article info abstract Article history: The synthesis of methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) can be carried out by the condensation of acetone in the Received 9 May 2018 presence of hydrogen over a supported metal catalyst. Previous studies have shown that hydroxyapatite Revised 26 June 2018 is an excellent catalyst for condensation reactions. The present investigation was undertaken in order to Accepted 2 July 2018 elucidate the reaction mechanism and site requirements for acetone coupling to MIBK over a physical Available online 18 July 2018 mixture of hydroxyapatite and Pd/SiO2. The reaction is found to proceed by consecutive aldol addition to form diacetone alcohol (DAA), dehydration of DAA to mesityl oxide (MO), and hydrogenation of MO Keywords: to MIBK.
    [Show full text]
  • Dose–Response Assay for Synthetic Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Attractant Using a High-Throughput Screening System
    insects Article Dose–Response Assay for Synthetic Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Attractant Using a High-Throughput Screening System Dae-Yun Kim 1, Theerachart Leepasert 2, Michael J. Bangs 1 and Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap 1,* 1 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart Univeristy, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; [email protected] (D.-Y.K.); [email protected] (M.J.B.) 2 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Entomological surveillance is important to evaluate vector management inter- ventions. However, collecting adult mosquitoes using direct human bait is controversial and often discouraged because of potential infection risk. Alternatively, active and passive trapping methods are available. Female mosquitoes detect human host cues such as body heat, carbon dioxide, and other volatile body emanations using olfactory sensilla to direct movement to a host. Attractive chemical lures have been identified and evaluated using a variety of olfactometric methods to in- crease trap production and efficiency. In this study, we evaluated a simple olfactometer without need of airflow. To ‘optimize’ a commercial mosquito attractant, 10 different doses of product, the TM Biogents-lure (BG-lure ), were compared. Results showed dose-dependent responses with 0.005 g with the highest attraction for Aedes aegypti, while doses of 0.2 g and above produced a repellent Citation: Kim, D.-Y.; Leepasert, T.; response. There was no significantly different response behavior between permethrin-susceptible Bangs, M.J.; Chareonviriyaphap, T. and -resistant Ae. aegypti. Culex quinquefasciatus showed significantly different responses compared Dose–Response Assay for Synthetic to Ae.
    [Show full text]
  • Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
    Issued: Data Sheet 19-Sep-2005 Product Name Methyl isobutyl ketone Product Code S1215 Asia Pacific Product Category Ketones CAS Registry 108-10-1 Number EINECS Number 203-550-1 Alternate Name 2-methyl-2-pentanone, hexanone, MIBK Description Methyl isobutyl ketone, MIBK, a medium boiling ketone is a stable water-white liquid. Like acetone and MEK, it displays strong solvent power for cellulose esters vinyl polymers and copolymers, and most natural and synthetic resins. MIBK is a medium evaporating solvent with excellent solvency characteristics and with a high tolerance for hydrocarbon diluents. Sales Property Unit Min Max Method Specification Purity % m/m 99.5 ASTM D3329 Water % m/m 0.05 ASTM D1364 Methyl isobutyl carbinol mg/kg 1000 ASTM D3329 Mesityloxide + mg/kg 1000 ASTM D3329 Isomesityloxide Dimethylketone mg/kg 1000 ASTM D3329 Appearance Cl & FFSM ASTM D4176 Color Pt-Co 10 ASTM D1209 Density @20°C g/mL 0.799 0.802 ASTM D4052 (4) Refractive Index @20°C 1.395 1.397 ASTM D1218 (4) Acidity as Acetic acid % m/m 0.005 ASTM D1613 Non Volatile Matter g/100mL 0.002 ASTM D1353 Distillation, IBP °C 114.0 ASTM D1078 (4) Distillation, DP °C 117.0 ASTM D1078 (4) (1) Guaranteed, (2) Typical, (3) Report Only, (4) Guaranteed spec with typical result Product as produced complies with DIN 53247, ASTM D 1153 and ACS 9th edition. Typical Properties Property Unit Method Value Density @20°C kg/L ASTM D4052 0.800 Cubic Expansion Coefficient @20°C (10^-4)/°C - 12 Refractive Index @20°C - ASTM D1218 1.396 Distillation, IBP °C ASTM D1078 114.0 Distillation,
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of a Crumb Rubber
    Abstract 2415 The National Toxicology Program Synthetic Turf/Recycled Tire Crumb Rubber Research: Characterization of a Crumb Rubber Lot for Use in in Vitro and in Vivo Studies Tim Cristy1, Georgia Roberts2, Brian Burback1, Scott Masten2 and Suramya Waidyanatha2 1Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH; 2Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 ABSTRACT METHODS AND INSTRUMENTATION RESULTS RESULTS ANALYSES OF VOLATILES (PPM) BY HEADSPACE GC-MS Optical Microscopy: An Olympus SZX12 stereo microscope with an Olympus DP-71 camera Artificial turf athletic fields have been growing in popularity due to decreased ANALYSIS FOR INORGANICS a (Tokyo, Japan). Compound Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Match Score (%) maintenance required relative to conventional fields. Crumb rubber (CR) used as an Element Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 3.48 3.21 3.35 98.6 infill in artificial turf has brought public health concerns in recent years. The National Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS): Zinc (%) 1.62 1.74 1.68 Aniline 0.980 1.12 1.05 99.6 JEOL 7600-F (JOEL, Tokyo, Japan) and Apollo X silicon drift detector (EDAX, Mahwah, NJ). Silicon (%) 0.898 0.966 0.932 Benzothiazole 0.753 0.684 0.719 94.0 Toxicology Program (NTP) is conducting research to improve the understanding of Toluene 0.441 0.415 0.428 100.0 Thermogravimetric Analysis: Pyris 1 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) thermal gravimetric Aluminum (%)
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Listed Wastes Table 1: Maximum Concentration of Contaminants For
    EPA Listed Wastes Table 1: Maximum concentration of contaminants for the toxicity characteristic, as determined by the TCLP (D list) Regulatory HW No. Contaminant CAS No. Level (mg/L) D004 Arsenic 7440-38-2 5.0 D005 Barium 7440-39-3 100.0 D0018 Benzene 71-43-2 0.5 D006 Cadmium 7440-43-9 1.0 D019 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.5 D020 Chlordane 57-74-9 0.03 D021 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 100.0 D022 Chloroform 67-66-3 6.0 D007 Chromium 7440-47-3 5.0 D023 o-Cresol 95-48-7 200.0** D024 m-Cresol 108-39-4 200.0** D025 p-Cresol 106-44-5 200.0** D026 Cresol ------------ 200.0** D016 2,4-D 94-75-7 10.0 D027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 7.5 D028 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.5 D029 1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4 0.7 D030 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 0.13* D012 Endrin 72-20-8 0.02 D031 Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.008 D032 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 0.13* D033 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 0.5 D034 Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 3.0 D008 Lead 7439-92-1 5.0 D013 Lindane 58-89-9 0.4 D009 Mercury 7439-97-6 0.2 D014 Methoxychlor 72-43-5 10.0 D035 Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 200.0 D036 Nitrobenzene 98-95-3 2.0 D037 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 100.0 D038 Pyridine 110-86-1 5.0* D010 Selenium 7782-49-2 1.0 D011 Silver 7740-22-4 5.0 D039 Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 0.7 D015 Toxaphene 8001-35-2 0.5 D040 Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 0.5 D041 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 400.0 D042 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 2.0 D017 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 1.0 D043 Vinyl Chloride 74-01-4 0.2 * Quantitation limit is greater than the calculated regulatory level.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromatographic Separations of Niobium, Tantalum, Molybdenum, and Tungsten Lionel Herbert Dahmer Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1966 Chromatographic separations of niobium, tantalum, molybdenum, and tungsten Lionel Herbert Dahmer Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Analytical Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Dahmer, Lionel Herbert, "Chromatographic separations of niobium, tantalum, molybdenum, and tungsten " (1966). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5355. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5355 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfihned exactly as received 67-5577 DAHMER, Lionel Herbert, 1936- CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATIONS OF NIOBIUM TANTALUM, MOLYBDENUM, AND TUNGSTEN. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ph.D., 1966 Chemistry, analytical University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CHROyiATOGRAPHIC SEPARATIONS OP NIOBIUM TANTALUM, MOLYBDENUM, AND TUNGSTEN by Lionel Herbert Dahmer A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Analytical Chemistry Approved : Signature was redacted for privacy. In Cha lor V/ork Signature was redacted for privacy. Heâi of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. De^t of Gr&duate College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa 1966 ii TABLE OP CONTEXTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 PART I. CATION EXCHANGE SEPARATION OF MOLYBDENUM, 8 TUNGSTEN, NIOBIUM, AND TANTALUM PROM OTHER METAL IONS LITERATURE SURVEY 9 EXPSRIKSITAL 10 Apparatus 10 Reagents 10 Separation Procedure 12 Analysis of Column Effluents 14 Results and Discussion 15 PART II.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D MEK Product Brochure
    Appendix D MEK Product Brochure PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 1 of 2 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone, MEK) O ll MW = 72.11 CH3CCH2CH3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone, Chemical Abstracts Registry Number 78-93-3 Wiswesser Line Formula Chemical Notation 2V1 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) is a accounts for its largest use. Other important applications are as clear, colorless, low-boiling organ- Nitrocellulose lacquers consume an extraction solvent for the ic liquid with a typical ketone large volumes of Methyl Ethyl dewaxing of lube oil and as an odor. It is a fast evaporating sol- Ketone and solubilization of intermediate in the production of vent with an evaporation rate simi- acrylic coatings also contributes to antioxidants, perfumes and cata- lar to ethyl acetate. Although not the overall use of Methyl Ethyl lysts. Methyl Ethyl Ketone is also as volatile as acetone, Methyl Ketone by the surface coatings used by the hard wood pulping Ethyl Ketone is similar to acetone industry. MEK is preferred as a industry and in the production of in many respects. It is miscible lacquer solvent, because high con- smokeless powder. It is routinely with most organic solvents and is centrations of resins possessing used in printing inks, degreasing an excellent solvent for most natu- superior aliphatic and aromatic and cleaning fluids and as a com- ral and synthetic resins. diluent tolerance can be readily ponent of the solvent system used achieved as low viscosity solu- in producing magnetic tape. Methyl Ethyl Ketone is a highly tions. versatile organic compound but Methyl Ethyl Ketone as a chemi- finds its greatest utility as a sol- Methyl Ethyl Ketone is also com- cal intermediate will undergo the vent in the surface coatings indus- monly used as a solvent for rubber typical reactions associated with try.
    [Show full text]