DOCSLIB.ORG

RWANDA Agricultural Survey 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RWANDA Agricultural Survey 2006 RWANDA Agricultural Survey 2006 National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning Unit of Planning, Policy and Capacity Building Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources June 2007 FOREWORD Jointly -funded by both the governments of Rwanda and the Netherlands, The Division of Policy, Planning and Capacity Building in MINAGRI, partnered with the National Statistics Institute of Rwanda, (MINECOFIN), has established an agriculture statistics Service in charge of collecting, analyzing and publishing information pertaining to agriculture sector. In 2006, data collection has covered a representative sample of 1704 farmer households countrywide. Rwanda agricultural profile is extrapolated from results set forth by this survey. This publication describes the methodology used, essential characteristic features of farmer households, use of agricultural inputs and manpower, crop productions, land use, animal farming during the 2006 season. Moreover, these results are compared to data of preceding years. This work is a joint production of a number of people namely: RUZINDAZA Ernest: Head of the Unit of Planning, Policy and Capacity Building in MINAGRI GATERA Emmanuel : ICT Director - NISR; RWAMASIRABO Serge: Analyst, MS Agriculture Economist; NKEZABAHIZI Désiré: Data and Biometrics Analyst, Ph D, A0 Husbandry; NYABYENDA Jean Marie: Statistician MINAGRI Late SHINGIRO Emmanuel: Computer specialist – Statistician. SEMUCYO NT Pascal: Computer Specialist - NIS The team highly pays tribute to heads of households who gave their time generously, and were cooperative to provide necessary information. They should be sure of our deep gratitude. We cannot forget 69 investigators of whom 14 controllers worked tirelessly on field for a quality work. May 11 data typists feel this token of gratitude for a wonderful task accomplished in quite short time. Finally, the team would like to reiterate appreciation to international consultant (David McGill), the MINAGRI and INSR staff, as well as staff who took part in this work. Agriculture Survey Team. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD......................................................................................................................................................................................................ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................................................................iii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................................... 0 1.1 Survey framework........................................................................................................................................................................ 0 1.2 Background....................................................................................................................................................................................... 0 1.3 Justification ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Survey objective ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 CHAPTER II - METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Survey Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Sampling............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3.1 Base Unit.................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.2 Sampling base......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.3 Selecting sample household ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Data Extrapolation........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.5 Yield calculation and farm commodities density ........................................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER III – DATA COLLECTION.................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Survey Questionnaire Description....................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Survey Organization .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Analyzed Parameters .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.4 Concept definition....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.5 Proceeding ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.6 Practical Organization .............................................................................................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER IV RESULTS 2006 .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 4.1. Characteristics of households : 2006 .......................................................................................................................... 13 4.2. Land size................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 4.3. Agricultural inputs ............................................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.3.1 Number of households using improved seeds by crop: ................................................................................ 18 4.3.2 Number of households using the ordinary seeds by crop ........................................................................... 19 4.3.3 Number of households using improved seeds by crop.................................................................................. 19 4.3.3 Number of households using inorganic fertilizers........................................................................................... 20 4.3.4 Number of households using pesticides ................................................................................................................ 20 4.3.5 Agricultural labour:............................................................................................................................................................ 20 4.4. Production in MT of Major Agricultural Crops in 2006 ......................................................................................... 20 4.4.1 Peas production:.................................................................................................................................................................. 21 4.4.2 Peanut and soybean production................................................................................................................................. 22 4.4.3 Sorghum:.................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 4.4.4 Maize production: ............................................................................................................................................................... 23 4.4.5 Rice production:................................................................................................................................................................... 24 4.4.6 Cassava:.................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 4.4.7 Sweet potato: .......................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Struggling to Survive: Barriers to Justice for Rape Victims in Rwanda
    Human Rights Watch September 2004 Vol. 16, No. 10(A) STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE: BARRIERS TO JUSTICE FOR RAPE VICTIMS IN RWANDA I. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................. 4 III. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 7 Sexual Violence during the 1994 Genocide.......................................................................... 7 Rwandan Women in the Post-Genocide Period................................................................10 IV. BARRIERS TO JUSTICE FOR SEXUAL VIOLENCE CRIMES .....................13 Genocide Prosecutions in the Rwandan Legal System.....................................................13 General Context..................................................................................................................13 Legislation Governing Genocide Trials and Gacaca.....................................................14 Cases of Sexual Violence in Genocide Trials and Gacaca Proceedings.....................18 Obstacles to Reporting Sexual Violence .............................................................................22 Victims’ Concerns Regarding Lack of Evidence ...........................................................23 Stigmatization, Retraumatization, and Inadequate Procedural Protections for Witnesses..............................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Page 1 of 16
    Rwanda Page 1 of 16 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Rwanda Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Rwanda is a constitutional republic dominated by a strong presidency. The population was 8.4 million. The largely Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), took power in 1994 and formed a government of National Unity that functioned during the transitional period following the civil war and genocide until 2003, when President Paul Kagame was elected to a seven-year term in largely peaceful but seriously marred elections. The country was affected by continuing instability in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where armed rebel groups continued to operate with impunity despite the presence of a UN peacekeeping mission in the DRC. During the first two months of the year, there were unconfirmed reports from credible sources that Rwanda Defense Forces (RDF) troops were at times present in the eastern part of the DRC, particularly following public threats by the Rwandan president in December 2004, which indicated that the government might send RDF troops into the DRC to attack Hutu rebels deemed a threat to its security. However, the government publicly denied allegations that RDF troops were operating in the DRC. Unlike in the previous year, there were no reports that Rwandan rebels in the DRC, known as the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), conducted attacks in the northwestern region of Rwanda. The FDLR, largely made up of Rwandan Hutus who fled to the DRC in 1994 after the genocide, continued to be led by many individuals responsible for leading the genocide, and it continued to actively oppose the Kagame government.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Assessment
    Rwanda, Country Information Page 1 of 54 RWANDA ASSESSMENT October 2002 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III ECONOMY IV HISTORY V STATE STRUCTURES VIA HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VIB HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VIC HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D: CATEGORISATION OF GENOCIDE CRIMES REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum / human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum / human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=191&title=Rwanda%2C%20Country%20Informati...o 11/25/2002 Rwanda, Country Information Page 2 of 54 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1 The Rwandan Republic is a land-locked country in east-central Africa, just south of the Equator, bordered by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) to the west, Uganda to the north, Tanzania to the east and Burundi to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • American Intervention Policy and the Failure to Act in Rwanda Jeremy Ryan Lund Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Why we were not there: American intervention policy and the failure to act in Rwanda Jeremy Ryan Lund Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Lund, Jeremy Ryan, "Why we were not there: American intervention policy and the failure to act in Rwanda" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12125. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12125 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why we were not there: American intervention policy and the failure to act in Rwanda By Jeremy Ryan Lund A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTERS OF ARTS Major: History Program of Study Committee: Charles Dobbs, Major Professor Tunde Adeleke David Cunningham Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 Copyright© Jeremy Ryan Lund, 2011. All rights reserved. ii Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: From tribal alliances to statehood and civil war 5 Chapter Two: Hopes for peace and thoughts of death: the Arusha Peace Accords, Hutu Power and blueprints for death 24 Chapter Three: A month for each horseman, genocide in Rwanda 42 Chapter Four: What were we thinking? American intervention policy and failure to act in Rwanda 67 Conclusion: A new commitment and a sad failure: America’s commitment to intervention 93 Bibliography: 111 1 Introduction Two monumental events shocked the world in the last decade of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Compromised RIGHTS the Legacy of Rwanda’S Community-Based Gacaca Courts WATCH
    Rwanda HUMAN Justice Compromised RIGHTS The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts WATCH Justice Compromised The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-757-4 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org may 2011 1-56432-757-4 Justice Compromised The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts I. Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 7 To the Rwandan Government ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA COUNTRY ASSESSMENT October 2003 Country Information
    RWANDA COUNTRY ASSESSMENT October 2003 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM RWANDA OCTOBER 2003 CONTENTS 1. Scope of Document 1.1 – 1.4 2. Geography 2.1 – 2.2 3. Economy 3.1 – 3.2 4. History Summary of events since independence 4.1 – 4.2 Outbreak of Civil War 4.3 – 4.4 Genocide of 1994 4.5 – 4.7 RPF takes power 4.8 – 4.22 2003 Presidential Elections 4.23 – 4.29 5. State Structures Constitution 5.1 – 5.3 Citizenship and Nationality 5.4 – 5.6 Political system 5.7 – 5.14 Formation of new parties 5.15 – 5.16 Local elections 5.17 – 5.20 Judiciary 5.21 – 5.22 Anti-corruption commission 5.23 Genocide trials 5.24 – 5.30 Gacaca system 5.31 – 5.40 Legal Rights/Detention 5.41 – 5.44 Death Penalty 5.45 Genocide suspects 5.46 – 5.47 Gisovu project 5.48 Penalties under Gacaca system 5.49 Local and international reaction to Gacaca 5.50 – 5.52 Internal Security 5.53 Rwandan Defence Force 5.54 – 5.57 Rwandan National Police 5.58 – 5.60 Local Defence Force 5.61 – 5.63 Directorate of Military Intelligence 5.64 Prisons and prison conditions 5.65 – 5.71 Cachots 5.72 Military Service 5.73 – 5.74 Conscientious Objectors and Deserters 5.75 Medical Services 5.76 – 5.80 Mental Health 5.81 HIV/AIDS 5.82 – 5.89 People with disabilities 5.90 Educational System 5.91 – 5.94 6. Human Rights 6A. Human Rights issues Overview 6.1 – 6.6 Torture 6.7 – 6.8 Extrajudicial Killings 6.9 – 6.11 Disappearances 6.12 – 6.13 Abuses by Rebel groups 6.14 – 6.16 Human Rights Organisations 6.17 – 6.18 Freedom of Speech and
    [Show full text]
  • Lasting Wounds HUMAN RIGHTS
    Rwanda Lasting Wounds HUMAN RIGHTS Consequences of Genocide WATCH and War on Rwanda’s Children March 2003 Vol. 15, No. 6 (A) RWANDA LASTING WOUNDS: Consequences of Genocide and War for Rwanda’s Children I. Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................1 II. Recommendations.................................................................................................................................................................3 To the Rwandan Government: ..............................................................................................................................................3 To Rwanda’s International Donors and UNICEF: ................................................................................................................4 III. Background..........................................................................................................................................................................5 IV. Children Attacked ...............................................................................................................................................................8 Children Targeted in the Genocide.......................................................................................................................................8 Children as Victims of Combat............................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Conflict and Schooling in Rwanda: Digging Deeper
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Guariso, Andrea; Verpoorten, Marijke Working Paper Armed conflict and schooling in Rwanda: Digging deeper LICOS Discussion Paper, No. 343 Provided in Cooperation with: LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven Suggested Citation: Guariso, Andrea; Verpoorten, Marijke (2013) : Armed conflict and schooling in Rwanda: Digging deeper, LICOS Discussion Paper, No. 343, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, Leuven This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/101056 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Compromised RIGHTS the Legacy of Rwanda’S Community-Based Gacaca Courts WATCH
    Rwanda HUMAN Justice Compromised RIGHTS The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts WATCH Justice Compromised The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-757-4 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org may 2011 1-56432-757-4 Justice Compromised The Legacy of Rwanda’s Community-Based Gacaca Courts I. Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 7 To the Rwandan Government ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • YKM V SSHD [2007] CSIH 55
    FIRST DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION Lord President [2007] CSIH 55 Lord Nimmo Smith XA96/05 Lord Clarke OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by THE LORD PRESIDENT in APPEAL by Y.K.M. Appellant ; against THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent : _______ Act: Bovey, Q.C., Caskie; Drummond Miller Alt: Lindsay; The Office of the Solicitor to the Advocate General 22 June 2007 The appellant's family history [1] The appellant has a tragic family history. He was the third of seven children of Hutu parents who had their home at Rwamagana in the eastern province of Kibungo, Rwanda. Many of his parents' neighbours and friends were Tutsis. Following the death of the Rwandan President in 1994 massacres took place, principally of Tutsis. One of the worst of these occurred in Rwamagana where 5,000 Tutsis, having fled from their homes and gathered at the Catholic church, were attacked by Interahamwe militia; only 200 escaped with their lives. [2] On the evening of 15 April 1994 the appellant, who was then 8 years of age, was at home with the other members of his family. Men arrived there looking for the family's Tutsi neighbours. They believed that the Tutsis were hiding in that home. When they arrived the appellant's parents, his two elder brothers and a cousin were in the living room. The appellant and his younger brothers and sisters were sleeping in a room at the back of the house. They were wakened by the cousin who told them that they should leave the house without making any noise.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01799-3 — Memory and Justice in Post-Genocide Rwanda Timothy Longman Index More Information 365
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01799-3 — Memory and Justice in Post-Genocide Rwanda Timothy Longman Index More Information 365 Index Abega clan, 61 Astrida. See Butare, city of administrative reorganization, 160 – 63 AVEGA, 170 popular opinions of, 214 – 16 purpose of, 161 Bagilishema, Ignace, 208 , 209 , 281 , 285 Aegis Trust, 12 Banyamulenge, 145 Kigali Memorial Centre, 5 , 80 – 81 Bashingantahe , 111 Murambi genocide memorial, 6 , 7 , 8 Belgium African National Congress, 320 colonial rule, 49 – 50 , 82 agricultural policy, 175 – 77 genocide trials, 95 Amnesty International, 29 , 98 post- colonial inl uence, 84 amplii ed silence, 87 Benebekire, 200 Angola Bisesero involvement in Congo war, 146 community, 325 Ansoms, An, 174 , 177 , 180 , 184 genocide massacre, 76 , 77 , 208 , 300 anthem, national genocide memorial, 5 , 77 , 88 , 94 popular reactions to, 218 Bizimungu, Pasteur, 141 , 147 , 154 replacement of, 160 foundation of opposition party, Arbour, Louise, 107 164 , 168 Arendt, Hannah, 98 Bizumuremyi, Bonaventure, 133 Argentina, 14 , 316 Bosnia- Herzegovina, 14 Armenian genocide, 99 Brasilia, 157 Army of the King, 149 Brazil, 14 , 316 arrest Brothers of Charity, 197 under false accusations, 21 , 119 , 123 , Buckley- Zistel, Susanne, 251 131 , 193 , 205 , 210 Bugesera, 67 , 202 of genocidaires , 93 , 149 , 204 , 262 , Bujumbura, 198 284 , 296 Bumba, 207 as intimidation, 29 , 31 , 120 , 142 , Burnet, Jennie, 87 , 231 149 , 156 , 169 , 192 , 203 , 229 , 252 , Burundi, 197 , 198 , 202 , 265 253 , 267 Bashingantahe system in, 111
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Page 1 of 4
    Rwanda Page 1 of 4 Rwanda International Religious Freedom Report 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, while the Government generally respects this right in practice, it fails to prevent local authorities from abusing or restricting religious freedoms. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom during the period covered by this report; however, there were multiple reports that local authorities harassed and detained members of Jehovah's Witnesses and Pentecostal groups. Jehovah's Witnesses continued to have trouble in some provinces with their children being expelled from school. Relations between the Government and the Catholic Church continued to improve. The generally amicable relationship among religions in society contributed to religious freedom. The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom issues with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country has an area of 10,169 square miles, and its population is approximately 8.2 million. A 2001 study conducted by a foreign university reported that 49.6 percent of the population was Catholic, 43.9 percent Protestant, 4.6 percent Muslim, 1.7 claimed no religious affiliation, and 0.1 percent practiced traditional indigenous beliefs. This study indicated a 19.9 percent increase in the number of Protestants, a 7.6 percent drop in the number of Catholics, and a 3.5 percent increase in the number of Muslims from the 1996 U.N. Population Fund survey. The figures for Protestants include the growing number of members of Jehovah's Witnesses and evangelical Protestant groups.
    [Show full text]