DOCSLIB.ORG

Rwandan Hiv/Aids Data Synthesis Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rwandan Hiv/Aids Data Synthesis Project TRAC Plus Center for Treatment and Research on AIDS, Malaria, Tuberculosis and Other Epidemics RWANDAN HIV/AIDS DATA SYNTHESIS PROJECT Final Report 1 PREFACE Public health practitioners frequently must make programmatic decisions with data that are less than perfect. The main reason to use such data is because few well-conducted, high-quality studies exist that can answer an everyday public health question directly, and often we rely instead on imperfect surveillance data to guide our actions. This lack of data has been of concern for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in Rwanda, where the scale-up of international resources has required rapid responses in planning and targeting prevention and treatment programs. In recent years in Rwanda, there has been a proliferation of HIV surveillance data, including sentinel surveillance in pregnant women, demographic and health surveys, and behavioral surveillance in youth, truck drivers, and sex workers. There also has been an increase in the number of quantitative and qualitative research studies, as well as an accumulation of local and national expertise. Despite this increase in available information, no method for synthesizing the data and no consistent way to analyze or interpret diverse data has been available. In the absence of time and resources to conduct the perfect study to guide programmatic and policy decision making, the important question of how can we use existing data to achieve similar purposes remains. The Center for Treatment and Research on HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Tuberculosis and other epidemics (Trac Plus), in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention––Global AIDS Program (CDC-GAP) Rwanda and with technical assistance from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), conducted an HIV data triangulation exercise to answer high priority questions using existing data sources in Rwanda. This exercise, funded by the Presidential Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), aimed to better define at-risk populations by geography and risk behavior and to determine the reach and intensity of corresponding programmatic responses. This report describes the steps involved in the triangulation exercise, presents the main findings of the triangulation process, and provides a launching point for next steps, including additional data collection and future research questions to be answered through triangulation. The true success of this exercise has been the integral participation of Rwandans, and we hope that the recommendations in this report will be used to strengthen HIV prevention efforts and improve the quality of life for Rwandan people living with HIV/AIDS. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Coordinating Committee for Data Triangulation and Modes of Transmission would like to thank the following: Trac Plus and CDC-GAP Rwanda for support in planning and conducting the HIV data triangulation exercise in Rwanda. This work would not have been possible without the scientific expertise and logistical support of the people in these organizations. The Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, for technical and logistical support. For their leadership and support of the triangulation process, the Committee would like to thank the Triangulation Sub-Working Group members: Hinda Ruton, Adeline Kabeja, Eugenie Kayirangwa, Gakunzi Sebaziga, and François Ndamage (in memoriam). For their technical assistance, the Committee would like to thank Stephanie Taché, Jonathan Aberle-Grasse, Willi McFarland, Heidi Frank, Hilary Spindler, Karen White, Roger Myrick, Lily Asrat, and Irene Iuppa. For participation in the Triangulation Stakeholders Meeting, the Committee would like to thank the Triangulation Task Force: the Center for Infectious Disease Control (CIDC), Center for Treatment and Research on HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Tuberculosis and other epidemics (Trac Plus); Commission Nationale de Lutte Contre le SIDA (CNLS); Institut National de Statistique (INS), the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Family Health International (FHI), Population Services International (PSI), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Ecole de Santé Publique de l‘Université Nationale du Rwanda (School of Public Health of the Rwanda National University). For their involvement in the Triangulation Technical Working Group, especially in refining the top questions from 10 to two, the Committee would like to thank Michael Kramer, Anita Asiimwe, Noni Gachuhi, Justus Kamwesigye, Eugenie Kayirangwa, Félix Ndagije, Elevanie Nyankesha, François Ndamage, Adeline Kabeja, Catherine Kayitesi, Hinda Ruton, Emilien Nkusi, Elisabetta Pegurri, Jessica Price, Janine Condo, Gatarayiha Philip, Gakunzi Sebaziga, Claire Nyiransabimana, Laurence Nyiramasarabwe, and François Sobela. 3 Acronyms ADB African Development Bank AIDS Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome ANC Antenatal care ART Antiretroviral therapy ARV Antiretroviral BSS Behavioral surveillance survey CDC-GAP US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Global AIDS Program CHK Centre Hospitalier Kigali CNLS Commission Nationale de Lutte Contre le SIDA (National AIDS Control Commission) CSW Commercial sex worker CVCT Couples voluntary counseling and testing DHS Demographic and Health Survey (conducted every five years in Rwanda by ORC-Macro) DRC Democratic Republic of Congo EPP Estimation and projection package FHI Family Health International FY Fiscal year GAMET Global AIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Team GLIA Great Lakes Initiative in AIDS HIV Human immunodeficiency virus INS Institut National de Statistique (National Institute of Statistics) MARPS Most-at-risk populations 4 MOH Ministry of Health MSF Médecins Sans Frontières (doctors without borders) MSM Men who have sex with men NASA National AIDS spending assessment NEC National Ethics Committee NGO Nongovernmental organization NHA National Health Accounts OGAC Office of the US Global AIDS Coordinator PEPFAR Presidents Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief PLACE Priorities for local AIDS control efforts PLWHA People living with HIV/AIDS PMTCT Prevention of mother-to-child-transmission PNLS National Program for the Fight Against AIDS PSF Project San Francisco PSI Population Services International STI Sexually transmitted infection THIS Tanzania HIV/AIDS Indicator Survey Trac Plus The Center for Treatment and Research on HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Tuberculosis and other epidemics UCSF-PPHG University of California, San Francisco–Prevention and Public Health Group UNAIDS The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS UNGASS United Nations General Assembly Special Session UNICEF United Nations Children‘s Fund 5 USAID The United States Agency for International Development VCT Voluntary counseling and testing WHO World Health Organization 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the processes, findings, and recommendations of the Rwanda Triangulation Project, 2008. ―Triangulation‖ aims to synthesize data from multiple sources to strengthen the understanding of complex health issues and help make evidence-based public health decisions. The methodology of triangulation involves overlapping data on prevalence, risk behaviors, cofactors, and programmatic response for a specific subpopulation or geographic area of concern. Triangulation was applied to data from Rwanda to answer two over-arching questions: What are the differences in HIV prevalence among different population groups over time? What are the potential causes for these differences? Are there gaps in HIV/AIDS programmatic coverage according to prevalence and/or need? The Rwanda Triangulation Project was carried out from December 2007 to September 2008. The project was launched with a stakeholder meeting to identify relevant questions. These questions were prioritized, data sources were identified, and a task force was created. Four months were devoted to compiling and analyzing data. Over 100 independent sources of information on the HIV epidemic in Rwanda were found, including demographic and health surveys, HIV behavioral surveillance data, quantitative and qualitative research studies, and programmatic reports. A final workshop was held in Kigali in September 2008 to conduct training on the methods of triangulation, interpret the data, and make recommendations. Participants at the final triangulation workshop in September 2008 examined a multitude of HIV/AIDS-related indicators at the national, new province, and former province levels to understand epidemic patterns by geography. Data from sentinel surveillance at antenatal clinics (ANCs) were used as the basic gauge of HIV prevalence trends, while the 2005 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) was used to look at magnitude of HIV prevalence. Using the ANC data, the DHS data, and potentially corroborative data from other sources, participants were charged with identifying regional (new province) epidemic patterns. Participants categorized the epidemic by ―concerning‖ and ―reassuring‖ using the national DHS indicators as a basis for comparison. Data gathered from the Great Lakes Initiative in AIDS (GLIA) show that indicators of risk in Rwanda appear to be substantially lower than those in other GLIA countries, such as Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. National data indicate low and apparent decline in HIV prevalence between 2003 and 2005, with a plateau after 2005, based on ANC and DHS HIV prevalence data. Although the HIV epidemic in Rwanda appears stable and declining, there are significant urban-rural differences in ANC prevalence. Urban sites
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rhode Island M Edical J Ournal
    RHODE ISLAND M EDICAL J OURNAL SPECIAL SECTION GLOBAL HEALTH GUEST EDITORS: ADAM C. LEVINE, MD, MPH; ALISON S. HAYWARD, MD, MPH SEPTEMBER 2019 VOLUME 102 • NUMBER 7 ISSN 2327-2228 RHODE ISLAND M EDICAL J OURNAL 16 Little Rhody Goes Global ADAM C. LEVINE, MD, MPH; ALISON S. HAYWARD, MD, MPH GUEST EDITORS 17 Addressing Global Human Rights Violations in Rhode Island: The Brown Human Rights Asylum Clinic ODETTE ZERO, BA, MD-ScM ‘22; MARGA KEMPNER, BA, MD ‘22; SARAH HSU, BA, MD-ScM ‘22; HEBA HALEEM, BA, MD ‘22; ELIZABETH TOLL, MD; ELIZABETH TOBIN-TYLER, JD, MA A. Levine, MD, MPH A. Hayward, MD, MPH 21 Obstetric Fistula Repair in Sub-Saharan Africa: Partnering to Create Sustainable Impact for Patients and Trainees AMITA KULKARNI, MD; ANNETTA MADSEN, MD; SARAH ANDIMAN, MD; ARLENE NISHIMWE, MD; B. STAR HAMPTON, MD 25 A Collaborative Family Planning Program in Rural Uganda Utilizing Community Health Workers ALISON S. HAYWARD, MD, MPH; KELSEY BROWN, MD’22 28 Tele-ECHO for Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Rural Kenya: A Feasibility Study LINDSAY DREIZLER, MD’21; GRACE W. WANJIKU, MD, MPH 32 Building and Sustaining Partnerships in Health Workforce and Research Capacity in Rwanda STEPHANIE C. GARBERN, MD, MPH; KYLE D. MARTIN, MD; CATALINA GONZALEZ- MARQUES, MD; OLIVIER FÉLIX UMUHIRE, MD; DORIS LORETTE UWAMAHORO, MD; ADAM R. ALUISIO, MD, MSc; ADAM C. LEVINE, MD, MPH 36 Developing a Novel Mobile Health (mHealth) Tool to Improve Dehydration Assessment and Management Rwandan emergency medicine residents and inter- in Patients with Acute Diarrhea in Resource-Limited Settings national faculty outside of the ambulance entrance MONIQUE GAINEY, MS, MPH; MEAGAN BARRY, MD, PhD; at the Kigali University Teaching Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Health Care Sector and Business Opportunities in Rwanda
    Report on the Health Care Sector and Business Opportunities in Rwanda Kristina Leuchowius for SWECARE FOUNDATION September 2014 Table of Contents Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................................................... I Preface .............................................................................................................................................................................................. II 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 General .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Why Rwanda? ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Health is a prioritized sector ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.3 Health sector bottlenecks and needs ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.4 Perception of Swedish technology and health sector .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Health Systems
    Strengthening health systems Evidence-informed approaches and lessons learned from Rwanda ‘Institutional Support to Ministry of Health – Phase IV’ (Minisanté IV) Program Capitalization and Knowledge Management: generating lessons from program implementation and translating them into concrete actions at managerial and technical levels for increased ownership, evidence-based policy development and sharing of good practices This booklet is a product of the Ministry of Health in Rwanda in collaboration with the ‘Institutional Support to Ministry of Health – Phase IV’ (Minisanté IV) Program through support from the Belgian Development Agency. The book capitalizes on the work done within the BTC- Rwanda partnership and reflects on different components such as health system strengthening, Strengtheningmaternal health, mental health, urban health, health health technologies and ecologicalsystems interventions, decentralization and aid modalities reflections. It is also a reflection on the value of results achieved and the progress made through the whole institutional support process while providing an appreciation of the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and impact of planned Evidence-informedinterventions. In addition, this book is seen approaches as an intensive sharing and and learning lessons opportunity in order to draw useful lessons for other similar interventions, new policies and strategies in other learnedcountries and future from partnerships Rwanda in Rwanda. Strengthening health systems Evidence-informed approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of Death and Predictors of Childhood Mortality in Rwanda: a Matched Case-Control Study Using Verbal Social Autopsy Neil Gupta1,3,4* , Lisa R
    Gupta et al. BMC Public Health (2018) 18:1378 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6282-z RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Causes of death and predictors of childhood mortality in Rwanda: a matched case-control study using verbal social autopsy Neil Gupta1,3,4* , Lisa R. Hirschhorn2, Felix C. Rwabukwisi3, Peter Drobac1,3,4, Felix Sayinzoga5, Cathy Mugeni5, Fulgence Nkikabahizi5, Tatien Bucyana5, Hema Magge1,3, Daniel M. Kagabo3, Evrard Nahimana3, Dominique Rouleau3, Amelia VanderZanden6, Megan Murray1,4 and Cheryl Amoroso3 Abstract Background: Rwanda has dramatically reduced child mortality, but the causes and sociodemographic drivers for mortality are poorly understood. Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study of all children who died before 5 years of age in eastern Rwanda between 1st March 2013 and 28th February 2014 to identify causes and risk factors for death. We identified deaths at the facility level and via a community health worker reporting system. We used verbal social autopsy to interview caregivers of deceased children and controls matched by area and age. We used InterVA4 to determine probable causes of death and cause-specific mortality fractions, and utilized conditional logistic regression to identify clinical, family, and household risk factors for death. Results: We identified 618 deaths including 174 (28.2%) in neonates and 444 (71.8%) in non-neonates. The most commonly identified causes of death were pneumonia, birth asphyxia, and meningitis among neonates and malaria, acute respiratory infections, and HIV/AIDS-related death among non-neonates. Among neonates, 54 (31.0%) deaths occurred at home and for non-neonates 242 (54.5%) deaths occurred at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Research the Health-Related Millennium Development Goals (Mdgs)
    Open Access Research The health-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 2015: Rwanda performance and contributing factors Médard Nyandekwe1, Jean Baptiste Kakoma1, Manassé Nzayirambaho1,& 1University of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda &Corresponding author: Manassé Nzayirambaho, University of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda Key words: Rwanda, Millennium Development Goals, Health-related targets Received: 23/10/2016 - Accepted: 06/08/2018 - Published: 26/09/2018 Abstract Introduction: The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 2015 are the eight international development goals adopted by the Millennium Summit of the United Nations in 2000 to which Rwanda is signatory. In 1990, Rwanda was at least one of the Sub-Saharan Africa countries with poor performance on health-related MDGs indicators. To date, despite the setbacks caused by the 1994 genocide, impressive performance is registered. The objective of the study is to document Rwanda gradual progress to achieving the health-related MDGs 2015 targets from 1990 to 2014/2015. Methods: The study is retrospective and comparative documenting the period of 1990 to 2014/15. Results: The performance of Rwanda on health-related MDGs 2015 targets is impressive despite the negative effects of the 1990-1994 civil wars and the 1994 genocide against Tutsi on 1990's levels. In effect, out of 17 health-related MDGs indicators, eleven (11) registered "remarkable" performances, i.e. reached global levels or fastened Vision 2020 targets attainment, two (2) registered "good performances", i.e. reached basic or revised own targets exhibiting overall impressive performance, while four (4) "weaknesses" are observed, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggling to Survive: Barriers to Justice for Rape Victims in Rwanda
    Human Rights Watch September 2004 Vol. 16, No. 10(A) STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE: BARRIERS TO JUSTICE FOR RAPE VICTIMS IN RWANDA I. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................. 4 III. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 7 Sexual Violence during the 1994 Genocide.......................................................................... 7 Rwandan Women in the Post-Genocide Period................................................................10 IV. BARRIERS TO JUSTICE FOR SEXUAL VIOLENCE CRIMES .....................13 Genocide Prosecutions in the Rwandan Legal System.....................................................13 General Context..................................................................................................................13 Legislation Governing Genocide Trials and Gacaca.....................................................14 Cases of Sexual Violence in Genocide Trials and Gacaca Proceedings.....................18 Obstacles to Reporting Sexual Violence .............................................................................22 Victims’ Concerns Regarding Lack of Evidence ...........................................................23 Stigmatization, Retraumatization, and Inadequate Procedural Protections for Witnesses..............................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of PEPFAR's Contribution (2012-2017) to Rwanda's Human Resources for Health Program (2020)
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/25687 SHARE Evaluation of PEPFAR's Contribution (2012-2017) to Rwanda's Human Resources for Health Program (2020) DETAILS 270 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-67205-4 | DOI 10.17226/25687 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on the Evaluation of Strengthening Human Resources for Health Capacity in the Republic of Rwanda Under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR); Board on Global Health; Health and Medicine Division; National FIND RELATED TITLES Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2020. Evaluation of PEPFAR's Contribution (2012-2017) to Rwanda's Human Resources for Health Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25687. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Evaluation of PEPFAR's Contribution (2012-2017) to Rwanda's Human Resources for Health Program Evaluation of PEPFAR’s Contribution (2012–2017) to Rwanda’s Human Resources for Health Program Committee on the Evaluation of Strengthening Human Resources for Health Capacity in the Republic of Rwanda Under the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Board on Global Health Health and Medicine Division A Consensus Study Report of PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS Copyright National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sector Performance Report FY 2019-2020
    Rwanda Health Sector Performance Report 2019-2020 TABLE OF CONTENT FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENT ......................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. viii LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. HEALTHCARE SERVICE DELIVERY .............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Outpatient department (OPD) visits in health facilities ..................................................................... 3 1.2. Hospitalization .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Access to clinical laboratory services ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Page 1 of 16
    Rwanda Page 1 of 16 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Rwanda Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Rwanda is a constitutional republic dominated by a strong presidency. The population was 8.4 million. The largely Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), took power in 1994 and formed a government of National Unity that functioned during the transitional period following the civil war and genocide until 2003, when President Paul Kagame was elected to a seven-year term in largely peaceful but seriously marred elections. The country was affected by continuing instability in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where armed rebel groups continued to operate with impunity despite the presence of a UN peacekeeping mission in the DRC. During the first two months of the year, there were unconfirmed reports from credible sources that Rwanda Defense Forces (RDF) troops were at times present in the eastern part of the DRC, particularly following public threats by the Rwandan president in December 2004, which indicated that the government might send RDF troops into the DRC to attack Hutu rebels deemed a threat to its security. However, the government publicly denied allegations that RDF troops were operating in the DRC. Unlike in the previous year, there were no reports that Rwandan rebels in the DRC, known as the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), conducted attacks in the northwestern region of Rwanda. The FDLR, largely made up of Rwandan Hutus who fled to the DRC in 1994 after the genocide, continued to be led by many individuals responsible for leading the genocide, and it continued to actively oppose the Kagame government.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Assessment
    Rwanda, Country Information Page 1 of 54 RWANDA ASSESSMENT October 2002 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III ECONOMY IV HISTORY V STATE STRUCTURES VIA HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VIB HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VIC HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D: CATEGORISATION OF GENOCIDE CRIMES REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum / human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum / human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=191&title=Rwanda%2C%20Country%20Informati...o 11/25/2002 Rwanda, Country Information Page 2 of 54 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1 The Rwandan Republic is a land-locked country in east-central Africa, just south of the Equator, bordered by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) to the west, Uganda to the north, Tanzania to the east and Burundi to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014‑2018 Rwanda
    WHO COUNTRY COOPERATION STRATEGY 2014-2018 RWANDA WHO Country Cooperation Strategy 2014-2018 1 Contents Abbreviation............................................................................................................. 4 Preface...................................................................................................................... 7 Executive summary....................................................................................................8 1. Introduction.........................................................................................................11 2. Health and development challenges and national response ................................13 2.1. Macroeconomic, political and social context .....................................................13 2.2. Major determinants of health.............................................................................14 2.3. Health status of the population..........................................................................18 2.4. National responses to health challenges............................................................21 2.5. Health systems and services..............................................................................21 2.6. Contributions of Rwanda to the global health agenda.......................................24 2.7. Summary............................................................................................................26 3. Development cooperation and partnerships........................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Health Guidelines and Requirements Are an Attempt to Provide You with a GENERAL INFORMATION
    Rwanda: Post-Genocide Restoration and Peacebuilding TABLE OF CONTENTS Although no information sheet can address every conceivable contingency, the following health guidelines and requirements are an attempt to provide you with a GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................. 2 standard, which if followed, should optimize good health PREVENTION OF INSECT-BORNE ILLNESSES ................. 2 during your stay abroad. PREVENTION OF FOOD- AND WATER-BORNE You may find that local customs and practice, as well as ILLNESSES ..................................................................... 4 varying US physicians’ approaches, at times conflict with OTHER DISEASES .......................................................... 5 these guidelines. It is essential that you review these health guidelines and requirements with your physician, IMMUNIZATIONS ......................................................... 7 to discuss individual issues such as pre-existing medical IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE ......................................... 7 problems and allergies to specific drugs. Any further questions or concerns should be directed to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta (www.cdc.gov/travel) or to your own physician. PREVENTION OF INSECT-BORNE ILLNESSES Malaria Malaria is present in Rwanda and Uganda and prophylaxis is recommended. CDC guidelines suggest that prevention of malaria is possible if you carefully follow personal protective measures as described below and take one of the following antimalarial
    [Show full text]