Copyright 2011 Kwame A. Holmes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Copyright 2011 Kwame A. Holmes Copyright 2011 Kwame A. Holmes CHOCOLATE TO RAINBOW CITY: THE DIALECTICS OF BLACK AND GAY COMMUNITY FORMATION IN POSTWAR WASHINGTON, D.C., 1946-1978 BY KWAME A. HOLMES DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee Professor James R. Barrett, Chair Professor Orville Vernon Burton, co-Chair Associate Professor Siobhan Somerville Professor John D‘Emilio Abstract This dissertation historicizes popular assumptions which frame ―black‖ and ―gay‖ as exclusive urban identities and which brand black urban communities as embodiments of economic failure, disorderly heterosexuality and criminality and gay communities as embodiments of economic success, safety, urban renewal and whiteness. In order to denaturalize these assumptions my dissertation explores the material, political and discursive processes through which two adjacent Washington, D.C. geographies, Shaw and DuPont Circle, came to be understood as ―black‖ and ―gay‖ neighborhoods between the end of World War II and the 1978 mayoral election. The racial and sexual complexity of the populations who lived and traveled through DuPont Circle and Shaw in these years belie the ease with which Washingtonians map and inscribe homogenous racial and sexual identities onto them in the present day. I argue that the social movements formed by black and gay activists after World War II to combat both institutional structures of oppression and stigmatizing discourses that justified oppression became stages for redefinitions of the public meaning of ―black‖ and ―gay‖ in the urban context. As postwar logics of mass consumption and commodification came to dominate the way Americans understood the difference between citizens and non-citizens, black and gay movements used claims to particular neighborhoods to rebrand themselves as deserving participants in American life. However, severe economic stratification between the neighborhoods where ―black‖ and ―gay‖ identities were inscribed made activist coalition between black and gay movements impossible and contributed to popular notions that blackness and gayness operated on the urban landscape in oppositional ways. While there may have been an opportunity for black and gay movements to work together, the politicization of the urban landscape as well as the intensification of racial and economic stratification in the postwar era necessarily limited the kinds of narratives black and gay social movements could tell about who belonged within their political constituency or ii who was truly ―black‖ or ―gay.‖ This project then is less concerned with black and gay activism or agency around specific institutional oppressions. Instead, my dissertation interrogates the possibilities and limitations for stigmatized urban groups to rewrite public discourses that blamed them for the decline of the American city. iii Acknowledgements So often, writing a dissertation feels like a solitary endeavor, but without the support of a ―village‖ of mentors, colleagues, friends and family from around the country this dissertation would not have come to fruition. My thanks here can only scratch the surface of the debt of gratitude I owe and hope to pay forward one day. I must begin by thanking the funding organizations that have supported my research, teaching and writing. Thank you to the Office of Educational Equity, the National Science Foundation‘s GK-12 program, the Illinois Program for Research in the Humanities, the Graduate College at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the Department of History at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I am indebted to the many librarians and archivists who assisted me in my research over the past two years. My thanks to the staffs of the Kiplinger Research Library at the Historical Society of Washington, the Gelman Collection at the George Washington University Library and the Washingtoniana Division at the Martin Luther King Public Library in Washington, D.C. My dissertation would not exist without the work of Mark Meinke. Ten years ago, Mark took it upon himself to found the Rainbow History Project with the explicit goal of ―preserving the history‖ of Washington, D.C.‘s LGBTQ community. While Washington, D.C.‘s queer history has always been rich, prior to the Rainbow History Project, scholars had scant resources to pursue their interests in uncovering and analyzing D.C.‘s queer past. With little help from others, Mark conducted hundreds of interviews, compiled tens of thousands of documents, crafted critical database resources and forged a critical relationship with the Historical Society of Washington. Mark did all of this with little interest in earning acclaim, fortune or even a graduate degree. Rather, he did it for the love of D.C.‘s complex and diverse queer community. I, and every scholar invested iv in LGBTQ history, owes him a debt of gratitude. Thank you Mark, I feel fortunate to call you a friend. Thanks also to Rebecca Dolinsky and Phillip Clarke who have taken over the reins at Rainbow History and who are wonderful stewards of D.C. LGBTQ history in their own right. Throughout my graduate career I have been privileged to be a part of reading groups and interdisciplinary writing seminars that enriched my thinking and afforded me space to air out my ideas. I would like to thank the members of my first research seminar, run by Professor Barrett in the fall of 2004. Many participants in that seminar were regulars at the Working Class History Reading Group, a graduate organized reading seminar that offered me a safe space to present my ideas in their nascent stages. My thanks to the faculty members who were regular participants in the group, Mark Leff and Kathy Oberdeck. As well as the graduate students who hosted our meetings and made up the backbone of its participants. Thank you, Tom Mackaman, Mike Rosenow, Will Cooley, Melissa Rohde, Janine Giordano Drake, Jason Kozlowski, Anthony Sigismondi, Julilly Kohler Hausmann, Stephanie Seawell, Kerry Pimblott, Martin Smith, Emily Pope Obeda, Zachary Sell, Anna Kurhajec and Ian Hartman. During the 2010-2011 academic year I was fortunate enough to be a part of three life changing reading groups. All of which were critical in shaping the direction my dissertation project would take; The Newberry Urban History Seminar, the Queer Studies Reading Group and the Illinois Program for Research in the Humanities fellows‘ seminar. My thanks to Kathryn Wegner who helped me to co-coordinate the Newberry group this year. Though I joined the Queer Studies Reading Group a little late in the game, I am so happy I did. Not only did I learn so much, but I made wonderful friends. Thank you to, Ryan Jones, Peter Campbell, Michelle Salerno, T.J. Tallie, Sarah Cassinelli, Mel Stanfill, Jean Lee, Durell Callier, Ricky Rodriguez, Martin Manalansan and Chantal Nadeau. v I cannot express the unmitigated thrill it was to be chosen as a Nicholson fellow with the Illinois Program for Research in the Humanities. This honor not only offered me the time and space to complete my dissertation, the monthly fellows seminars were laboratories of inspiration. I left each with new ideas and methodological approaches that enriched my work. For that I must thank my 2010-2011 IPRH family, Bruce Levine, Tamara Chaplin, Erik McDuffie, Tim Cain, Ryan Griffis, Audrey Petter, Patricia Goldsworthy-Smith, Nicholas Brown, Urmitapa Dutta, Elizabeth Hoiem, Cory Holding, Nile Blunt, Kristine Nielsen, Jeffrey Droun and Sarah Frohardt-Lane. The graduate faculty in the department of history has been wonderfully supportive of my dissertation project. David Roediger, Eizabeth Pleck and Erik McDuffie were kind enough to read proposals, chapters and conference papers that were integrated into this dissertation. Thank you all for your feedback. Professor Roediger, in particular, went above and beyond the call of duty in supporting my project over the past few years. I am extremely grateful to the group of scholars that sat on my committee and who have mentored me over the past 8 years. John D‘Emilio and Siobhan Somerville brought a wealth of experience and knowledge on queer studies to the table. Their questions, challenges and insights have enriched this project and opened my eyes to its potential in the future. Throughout my tenure through the program I have been fortunate enough to be guided by two co-advisors Vernon Burton and Jim Barrett. Few scholars are more invested in their student‘s success than Professor Burton. He doggedly pursued funding opportunities on my behalf and was always there to hear out my ever shifting ideas about the dissertation project. More than that, Professor Burton opened the doors of his home and family to me from the moment I arrived on campus. Both he and his wife Georganne have stood by me during trying personal times. I will be forever indebted to their grace and kindness. Jim Barrett is not only a model scholar, but represents the kind of academic mentor I aspire to emulate in the future. Equal parts intellectually rigorous and patient Jim gave me the space vi to allow my ideas to develop organically and pushed me only to realize the best possible dissertation within the goals I set for myself. Over the last 8 years I have not only formed relationships with colleagues I have made the closest friends I have in this world. Were I to communicate how special each one of you is to me this acknowledgements page would balloon to the size of a small dissertation chapter. All I will say is that you‘ve each taught me the meaning of friendship in your own way. Thank you for letting me be a part of your lives, Robyn Carter, John Stevenson, Bobby Robinson, William Kinsella, Ian Hartman, Ed Onaci, Sarah Frohardt-Lane, Anna Kurhajec, Brandon Mills, Amy Hasinoff, Julilly Kohler-Hausman, Melissa Prentice, Anthony Sigismondi, Brian Yates and Erica Hill-Yates.
Recommended publications
  • Senate 14807 A
    1963 C0NGRESSI0NAL RECORD- SENATE 14807 A. James D. Mann, 839 17th ·Street NW., A. Sessions & Caminita, 917 15th Street Washington, D;C, NW., Washington, D.C. SENATE B. National Association of Motor Bus B. Floyd A. Segel, 215 West Oregon Street, Owners, 839 17th Street ·NW., Washington, Milwaukee, Wis. T UESDAY, AUGUST 13, 1963 D.C. A. Clifford Setter, 55 West 44th Street, The Senate met at 12 o'clock meridian, A. Morison, Murphy, Clapp & Abrams, the New York, N.Y. and was called to order by the President Pennsylvania Building, Washington, D.C. B. United States Plywood Corp. pro tempore. B. William S. Beinecke, 114 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. The Chaplain, Rev. Frederick Brown A. Laurence P. Sherfy, 1102 Ring Build­ Harris, D.D., offered the following ing, Washington, D.C. prayer: A. Raymond Nathan, 1741 DeSales Street B. American Mining Congress, Ring Build­ NW., Washington, D.C. ing, Washington, D.C. B. Associated Fur Manufacturers, 101 Our Father God, bowing at this way­ West 30th Street, New York, N.Y. side shrine where spirit with spirit may A. Gerald H. Sherman, 1000 Bender Build­ meet, we thank Thee for the ministry A. Raymond Nathan, 1741 DeSales Street ing, Washington, D.C. of prayer through whose mystic doors NW., Washington, D.C. B. Association for Advanced Life Under­ we may escape from the prosaic hum­ B. Glen Alden Corp., 1740 Broadway, New writing, 1120 Connecticut Avenue NW., drum of "day-by-day-ness" and, lifted to York, N.Y. Washington, D.C. a wider perspective, return illumined and empowered.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandspur, Vol 79 No 04, October 25,1972
    University of Central Florida STARS The Rollins Sandspur Newspapers and Weeklies of Central Florida 10-25-1972 Sandspur, Vol 79 No 04, October 25,1972 Rollins College Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cfm-sandspur University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Newspapers and Weeklies of Central Florida at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Rollins Sandspur by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Rollins College, "Sandspur, Vol 79 No 04, October 25,1972" (1972). The Rollins Sandspur. 1427. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cfm-sandspur/1427 "The OTHERS" ' ^ r ,+ ~m_ fr<HI* h m See page 2 and page 4. From The We Get Letters Basement Dear Editor: campaign. And, if they did knowaboui- A national poll, taken in early September, they did), they were and are just asbmi It is my hope that Peter's feature on the Scho­ claimed that 64% of the American electorate devious as many people believed them1 ol for Continuing Studies will shed a bit of light want to re-elect the President for another four on the "other" Rollins-who the people are, why year term. This is a sad situation indeed. Finally, we still have the terriblep^ they are here, how "we" regard them. It seems Surely the American public must understand Vietnam. What it comes down toistfe to me that the Rollins administration has adequ­ that the President is constantly lying to them tinuation and escalation of a policy j;, ately defined their existence and their program about the national and international scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater H Street NE Heritage Trail: Heritage Trail
    On this self-guided walking Hub, Home, tour of Greater H Street, historical markers lead you to: Heart – Swampoodle, whose residents helped build the Capitol GREATER H STREET NE and the White House. HERITAGE TRAIL – The route British forces marched on their way to burn the Capitol and White House. – Gallaudet University, recognized as the center of American Deaf Culture. – Trinidad rowhouses, built on a former brickyard and baseball field. – The small brick storefronts where hundreds of immigrant families got their toe-hold in Washington. – Union Terminal Market, purveyor to the city. – The arena where the Beatles performed their first U.S. concert and Malcolm X spoke. – The performing arts center that is spurring the neighborhood’s most recent renewal. A bustling, working-class neighborhood grew up here alongside the railroad and streetcar. Mom-and-pop businesses served all comers in the city’s leading African American shopping district. Discover how, even aἀer the devastating 1968 civil disturbances, the strong community prevailed to witness H Street’s 21st-century revival. Welcome. In 2005 the Atlas Performing Arts Center opened in a renovated Atlas movie theater. Restaurants and clubs followed, and a new chapter began for the long-neglected H Street, NE, commercial corridor. What stories do these old brick storefronts hold? Follow Hub, Home, Heart: Greater H Street, NE Heritage Trail to meet the entrepreneurial families who lived and ran businesses here. Along the way, learn how the neighborhood became an important transportation hub and a bustling, working-class community. This eepsakek guide summarizes the 18 signs of the city’s 13th Official Walking Tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Recommendation
    STAFF RECOMMENDATION Lucy Kempf NCPC File No. 6863 MEMORIAL TO VICTIMS OF THE UKRAINIAN MANMADE FAMINE OF 1932-33 Reservation 196 New Jersey Avenue, 1st, E and F Streets, NW Washington, DC Submitted by the National Park Service September 25, 2008 Abstract The National Park Service (NPS), on behalf of the Government of Ukraine has submitted a request for site approval for the Memorial to Victims of the Ukrainian Manmade Famine of 1932-1933. The National Park Service’s preferred site, Reservation 196, occupies approximately 3800 square feet of federally owned land and is at the intersection of New Jersey Avenue and 1st Street, NW between E and F Streets. Reservation 196 is identified as site #98 in The Memorials and Museums Master Plan. An alternative site, Reservation 78, is 3100 square feet of federally owned land one block west of Union Station at the intersection of North Capitol Street, Massachusetts Avenue and F Street, NW. The Memorial to Victims of the Ukrainian Manmade Famine is authorized by Public Law 109-340. The National Capital Memorial Advisory Commission (NCMAC), which advises the Department of the Interior on site selection, approved moving Reservation 196 and the alternative, Reservation 78, forward for review by NCPC and the Commission of Fine Arts (CFA). The NPS has developed an Environmental Assessment, which studies both sites as well as a no-action alternative. CFA approved the alternative site, Reservation 78, on September 18, 2008. Commission Action Requested by Applicant Approval of site selection pursuant to Public Law 109-340, and the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Name
    What’s In A Name: Profiles of the Trailblazers History and Heritage of District of Columbia Public and Public Charter Schools Funds for the DC Community Heritage Project are provided by a partnership of the Humanities Council of Washington, DC and the DC Historic Preservation Office, which supports people who want to tell stories of their neighborhoods and communities by providing information, training, and financial resources. This DC Community Heritage Project has been also funded in part by the US Department of the Interior, the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund grant funds, administered by the DC Historic Preservation Office and by the DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities. This program has received Federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the District of Columbia. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its federally assisted programs. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240.‖ In brochures, fliers, and announcements, the Humanities Council of Washington, DC shall be further identified as an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities. 1 INTRODUCTION The ―What’s In A Name‖ project is an effort by the Women of the Dove Foundation to promote deeper understanding and appreciation for the rich history and heritage of our nation’s capital by developing a reference tool that profiles District of Columbia schools and the persons for whom they are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Westinghouse Memorial City of Pittsburgh Historic Landmark Nomination
    “Untitled Photograph,” Carnegie Mellon University Architecture Archives. Westinghouse Memorial City of Pittsburgh Historic Landmark Nomination Prepared by Preservation Pittsburgh 412.256.8755 1501 Reedsdale St., Suite 5003 October, 2018. Pittsbu rgh, PA 15233 www.preservationpgh.org HISTORIC REVIEW COMMISSION Division of Development Administration and Review City of Pittsburgh, Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY HISTORIC NOMINATION FORM Fee Schedule HRC Staff Use Only Please make check payable to Treasurer, City of Pittsburgh Date Received: .................................................. Individual Landmark Nomination: $100.00 Parcel No.: ........................................................ District Nomination: $250.00 Ward: ................................................................ Zoning Classification: ....................................... 1. HISTORIC NAME OF PROPERTY: Bldg. Inspector: ................................................. Council District: ................................................ Westinghouse Memorial 2. CURRENT NAME OF PROPERTY: Westinghouse Memorial 3. LOCATION a. Street: W Circuit Rd. b. City, State, Zip Code: , Pittsburgh, Pa. 15217 c. Neighborhood: Schenley Park 4. OWNERSHIP d. Owner(s): City of Pittsburgh e. Street: 414 Grant St. f. City, State, Zip Code: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219 Phone: (412) 255-2626 5. CLASSIFICATION AND USE – Check all that apply Type Ownership Current Use: Structure Private – home Memorial District Private
    [Show full text]
  • Taste of Dupont 2011 Federal Law Requires Redistricting Every 10 Years Based on DC’S Population Shifts
    Have you Received A Redistricting Primer Your 2011 Membership Card? Taste of Dupont 2011 Federal law requires redistricting every 10 years based on DC’s population shifts. Total population is divided st Tuesday, June 21 , 6 - 10 pm by 8 – the 8 Wards. That number is allowed to vary by DCCA provides each 5% up or down. In the 2011 Census, DC’s population is member with a membership card, Take the opportunity to sample our wonderful Dupont Circle restaurants. 601,723. Ward 2 Councilman Jack Evans, a Co-Chair of the Subcommittee on Redistricting, notes that, after a featuring local Create your own progressive dinner with $5 individual tasting tickets postmodern redeemed at any one of the participating dining establishments, many of decline in 2000, we are once again close to 1990 levels of 606,900 people. impressionist painter which will have specially priced cocktails or wines paired with your Nicolas F. Shi's iconic tasting. $5 for each individual tasting, or a five tasting ticket package for According to the 2010 vs 2000 Census, Wards 1 to 7 Dupont Circle fountain. just $20! Larger ticket packages also available for groups. The card entitles the gained, while Ward 8 lost 215 residents, or 0.3%. After the 2010 Census, Ward 2 exceeded the allowable bearer to discounts at Extended Hours: Now open an hour longer due to popular demand! many Dupont shops and businesses. To range by 939, Ward 7 was below by 386 residents and Ward 8 was below by 742. Thus these three Wards receive your Dupont Circle Citizens Avoid the Long Lines: Tickets purchased online will be mailed and/or held Association card, join or renew your at Will Call at the Dupont Resource Center at 9 Dupont Circle (one-story require redistricting, which the Subcommittee on Redistricting is addressing.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Social Studies Pre-K Through Grade 12 Standards
    SOCIAL STUDIES District of Columbia Social Studies Pre-K through Grade 12 Standards SOCIAL STUDIES Contents Introduction . 2 Grade 4 — U.S. History and Geography: Making a New Nation . 18 Prekindergarten — People and How They Live . 6 The Land and People before European Exploration . 18 Age of Exploration (15th–16th Centuries). 18 People and How They Live . 6 Settling the Colonies to the 1700s . 19 Economics . 6 The War for Independence (1760–1789) . 20 Time, Continuity, and Change . 7 Geography . 7 Grade 5 — U.S. History and Geography: Westward Expansion Civic Values and Historical Thinking. 7 to the Present . 22 Kindergarten — Living, Learning, and Working Together. 8 The New Nation’s Westward Expansion (1790–1860) . 22 The Growth of the Republic (1800–1860) . 22 Geography . 8 The Civil War and Reconstruction (1860–1877). 23 Historical Thinking . 8 Industrial America (1870–1940) . 24 Civic Values . 8 World War II (1939–1945) . 25 Personal and Family Economics . 9 Economic Growth and Reform in Contempory America Grade 1 — True Stories and Folktales from America (1945–Present) . 26 and around the World . 10 Grades 3–5 — Historical and Social Sciences Analysis Skills . 28 Geography . 10 Chronology and Cause and Effect . 28 Civic Values . 10 Geographic Skills . 28 Earliest People and Civilizations of the Americas . 11 Historical Research, Evidence, and Point of View . 29 Grade 2 — Living, Learning, and Working Now and Long Ago . 12 Grade 6 — World Geography and Cultures . 30 Geography . 12 The World in Spatial Terms . 30 Civic Values . 12 Places and Regions . 30 Kindergarten–Grade 2 — Historical and Social Sciences Human Systems .
    [Show full text]
  • 1970 GENERAL ELECTION UNITED STATES SENATOR Republican Richard L
    1970 GENERAL ELECTION UNITED STATES SENATOR republican Richard L. Roudebush 29,713 democrat R. Vance Hartke 32,992 SECRETARY OF STATE republican William N. Salin 29,545 democrat Larry Conrad 31,295 AUDITOR OF STATE republican Trudy Slaby Etherton 29,271 democrat Mary Atkins 31,690 TREASURER OF STATE republican John M. Mutz 28,811 democrat Jack New 31,626 SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION republican Richard D. Wells 27,952 democrat John J. Loughlin 32,688 CLERK OF SUPREME & APPELLATE COURT republican Kendal E. Matthews 29,108 democrat Billie R. McCullough 31,160 JUDGE OF SUPREME COURT 2ND DISTRICT republican Joseph O. Carson 29,242 democrat Dixon W. Prentice 30,922 JUDGE OF SUPREME COURT 5TH DISTRICT republican Frank V. Dice 28,390 democrat Roger O. DeBruler 31,637 JUDGE APPELLATE COURT 1ST DISTRICT republican Paul H. Buchanan, Jr. 29,401 republican Robert B. Lybrook 28,341 democrat Thomas J. Faulconer 31,084 democrat Jonathan J. Robertson 31,354 JUDGE APPELLATE COURT 2ND DISTRICT republican Gilbert Bruenberg 28,796 republican Alfred J. Pivarnik 28,076 democrat Robert H. Staton 31,165 democrat Charles S. White 31,700 REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS 8TH DISTRICT republican Roger H. Zion 33,915 democrat J. David Huber 28,508 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY republican Rodney H. Grove 30,560 democrat William J. Brune 31,141 JUDGE SUPERIOR COURT republican Alfred A. Kiltz 27,171 republican Claude B. Lynn 26,746 democrat Benjamin E. Buente 33,095 democrat Terry D. Dietsch 35,281 STATE SENATOR - VANDERBURGH, POSEY republican Sidney S. Kramer 29,851 democrat Philip H. Hayes 31,361 STATE REPRESENTATIVES republican John Coates Cox 30,018 republican James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Injustice
    Fighting Injustice by Michael E. Tigar Copyright © 2001 by Michael E. Tigar All rights reserved CONTENTS Introduction 000 Prologue It Doesn’t Get Any Better Than This 000 Chapter 1 The Sense of Injustice 000 Chapter 2 What Law School Was About 000 Chapter 3 Washington – Unemployment Compensation 000 Chapter 4 Civil Wrongs 000 Chapter 5 Divisive War -- Prelude 000 Chapter 6 Divisive War – Draft Board Days and Nights 000 Chapter 7 Military Justice Is to Justice . 000 Chapter 8 Chicago Blues 000 Chapter 9 Like A Bird On A Wire 000 Chapter 10 By Any Means Necessary 000 Chapter 11 Speech Plus 000 Chapter 12 Death – And That’s Final 000 Chapter 13 Politics – Not As Usual 000 Chapter 14 Looking Forward -- Changing Direction 000 Appendix Chronology 000 Afterword 000 SENSING INJUSTICE, DRAFT OF 7/11/13, PAGE 2 Introduction This is a memoir of sorts. So I had best make one thing clear. I am going to recount events differently than you may remember them. I will reach into the stream of memory and pull out this or that pebble that has been cast there by my fate. The pebbles when cast may have had jagged edges, now worn away by the stream. So I tell it as memory permits, and maybe not entirely as it was. This could be called lying, but more charitably it is simply what life gives to each of us as our memories of events are shaped in ways that give us smiles and help us to go on. I do not have transcripts of all the cases in the book, so I recall them as well as I can.
    [Show full text]
  • Commemorative Works Catalog
    DRAFT Commemorative Works by Proposed Theme for Public Comment February 18, 2010 Note: This database is part of a joint study, Washington as Commemoration, by the National Capital Planning Commission and the National Park Service. Contact Lucy Kempf (NCPC) for more information: 202-482-7257 or [email protected]. CURRENT DATABASE This DRAFT working database includes major and many minor statues, monuments, memorials, plaques, landscapes, and gardens located on federal land in Washington, DC. Most are located on National Park Service lands and were established by separate acts of Congress. The authorization law is available upon request. The database can be mapped in GIS for spatial analysis. Many other works contribute to the capital's commemorative landscape. A Supplementary Database, found at the end of this list, includes selected works: -- Within interior courtyards of federal buildings; -- On federal land in the National Capital Region; -- Within cemeteries; -- On District of Columbia lands, private land, and land outside of embassies; -- On land belonging to universities and religious institutions -- That were authorized but never built Explanation of Database Fields: A. Lists the subject of commemoration (person, event, group, concept, etc.) and the title of the work. Alphabetized by Major Themes ("Achievement…", "America…," etc.). B. Provides address or other location information, such as building or park name. C. Descriptions of subject may include details surrounding the commemorated event or the contributions of the group or individual being commemorated. The purpose may include information about why the commemoration was established, such as a symbolic gesture or event. D. Identifies the type of land where the commemoration is located such as public, private, religious, academic; federal/local; and management agency.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles “Free DC:” the Struggle For
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles “Free D.C.:” The Struggle for Civil, Political, and Human Rights in Washington, D.C., 1965-1979 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Selah Shalom Johnson 2015 © Copyright by Selah Shalom Johnson 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION “Free D.C.:” The Struggle for Civil, Political, and Human Rights in Washington, D.C., 1965-1979 by Selah Shalom Johnson Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Brenda Stevenson, Chair “Free D.C:” The Struggle for Civil, Political, and Human Rights in Washington, D.C., 1965-1979, illuminates one of the greatest political shortcomings in 20th century America, which was the failure to provide full political enfranchisement for the citizens of Washington, D.C. – the first major American city with a majority African-American population. This project centers on the Free D.C. Movement, a political crusade to fully enfranchise Washingtonians, through grassroots organizing and by pressuring the Federal government to address the political, social, and economic ills that plagued the nation’s capital for nearly a century. Washingtonians’ struggle for full political enfranchisement was one of the most significant goals and significant shortcomings of the 20th century. ii Washington has been an under-researched part of Civil Rights Movement history, even though the city had an instrumental role during this era. My project explores the “Free D.C.” Movement through the lens of residential segregation, employment, and education. I examine how the desire for institutional changes and improvements in these areas helped shape and direct the local movement, and consequently undermined Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]