Pax T Ime Results #4 - 2013 T Ripod Challenge Day 1 - Sat 06-29-2013 T Imed Entries: 141

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pax T Ime Results #4 - 2013 T Ripod Challenge Day 1 - Sat 06-29-2013 T Imed Entries: 141 Milwaukee Region SCCA and Wisconsin A utocrossers Pax T ime Results #4 - 2013 T ripod Challenge Day 1 - Sat 06-29-2013 T imed Entries: 141 Pax Pos. Pos. Class # Driver Car Model T otal Factor Pax T ime Diff. From 1st 1 1 PSS 14 Chris Fenter 2004 Chevrolet Z06 Black 55.907 *0.859 48.024 0.000 0.000 2 1 ESP 97 Eric Thompson 1998 Chevrolet Camaro SS Black 56.793 *0.849 48.217 0.193 0.193 3 2 PSTR 95 Colin Fiedler 2008 Honda S2000 Chicane 57.654 *0.839 48.371 0.154 0.347 4 3 PDSP 41 Tim Aro 1995 Mazda Miata Red 56.581 *0.855 48.376 0.005 0.352 5 4 PSS 4 Chris Shay 2004 Z06 Black 56.417 *0.859 48.462 0.086 0.438 6 5 PDSP 411 Stephen Jones 1995 BMW 325is Black 56.730 *0.855 48.504 0.042 0.480 7 1 DM 197 Jeff Cashmore 1980 Daihatsu Mira Yellow 52.975 *0.918 48.631 0.127 0.607 8 1 STX 2 Lance Keeley 2013 scion frs white 58.818 *0.827 48.642 0.011 0.618 9 6 PSTC 177 Jason Frank 1989 Honda Civic Si Tiger Stripe 59.115 *0.824 48.710 0.068 0.686 10 7 PSTX 175 Preston Jordan 2008 Subaru WRX Black 58.927 *0.827 48.732 0.022 0.708 11 8 PSTS 97 Chris Bailey 1991 Mazda Miata Blue 58.904 *0.829 48.831 0.099 0.807 12 9 PSTS 197 Andrew Canak 1991 Mazda Miata Blue 58.968 *0.829 48.884 0.053 0.860 13 10 PSTS 17 Mark McKnight 1988 Honda CRX Red 58.989 *0.829 48.901 0.017 0.877 14 2 STX 8 Bart Hockerman 2013 Subaru WRB 59.229 *0.827 48.982 0.081 0.958 15 11 PSSP 96 Alex Tziortzis 2002 Corvette Z06 silver 56.411 *0.871 49.134 0.152 1.110 16 12 PSTX 89 Neal Tovsen 1993 BMW 325is Green 59.414 *0.827 49.135 0.001 1.111 17 13 PBSP 13 Brad Moore 1996 Chevy Corvette Silver 57.394 *0.858 49.244 0.109 1.220 18 1 ADS 77 Sam Karp 2013 Subaru WRX Blue 61.268 *0.805350 49.342 0.098 1.318 19 1 STR 53 Mike Leeder 2013 Mazda MX5 Club Red 58.817 *0.839 49.347 0.005 1.323 20 1 FM 40 Jason Hobbs 1999 NovakarF500 Yellow 53.824 *0.917 49.356 0.009 1.332 21 1 RCS 16 Jeff Slater 2007 Mazda Miata MSR Gray 60.805 *0.813150 49.443 0.087 1.419 22 1 FGS 747 John Azevedo 2000 FunPros.com Great White Landshark. um... thatd be white 62.184 *0.795600 49.473 0.030 1.449 23 14 PBSP 3 Marshall Moore 1996 Chevrolet Corvette Silver 57.746 *0.858 49.546 0.073 1.522 24 1 BS 53 Gehren Rall 2008 Honda S2000 CR Yellow 58.645 *0.845 49.555 0.009 1.531 25 3 STX 96 Kevin Schmitz 2013 Scion FR-S White 59.937 *0.827 49.567 0.012 1.543 26 4 STX 196 Ruben 96 2013 Scion FRS White 59.944 *0.827 49.573 0.006 1.549 27 2 RCS 7 Trevor Jones 2013 Subaru BRZ Black 61.008 *0.813150 49.608 0.035 1.584 28 5 STX 75 Steve Garnjobst 2008 Subaru WRX Gray 60.150 *0.827 49.744 0.136 1.720 29 3 RFS 81 Fun Cheng 2010 M3 White 61.509 *0.809250 49.776 0.032 1.752 30 1 STF 61 Todd Freeman 2006 Mini Cooper White 62.760 *0.795 49.894 0.118 1.870 31 4 RBS 4 Jason Kuks 2006 S2k Red 60.579 *0.823875 49.909 0.015 1.885 32 15 PSTC 72 Will Ostrowski 1991 Honda Civic RED 60.626 *0.824 49.955 0.046 1.931 33 5 RDS 79 Todd Moore 2004 BMW 330i Red 62.090 *0.805350 50.004 0.049 1.980 34 2 STR 89 Michael Ron 1999 Mazda Miata MX-5 Silver 59.624 *0.839 50.024 0.020 2.000 35 16 PSTX 9 Ivan Austin 1993 BMW 325is Green 60.496 *0.827 50.030 0.006 2.006 36 1 DS 90 Jocelin Huang 2011 Subaru WRX Black 60.593 *0.826 50.049 0.019 2.025 37 1 CS 235 Ted Juern Mazda Miata 60.083 *0.834 50.109 0.060 2.085 38 6 RDS 12 Carl Kirkesaard BMW 330i 62.269 *0.805350 50.148 0.039 2.124 39 1 XFS 910 Robert Gosda 2007 Ford Mustang GT BlackWhite 60.426 *0.830 50.153 0.005 2.129 40 7 RES 529 Mark Groseth 1995 Mazda Miata R Black 62.142 *0.807300 50.167 0.014 2.143 41 8 RDS 19 Bob Clark 2002 BMW 330ci Silver 62.322 *0.805350 50.191 0.024 2.167 42 2 DS 91 Charles Kim 2011 Subaru WRX Black 60.771 *0.826 50.196 0.005 2.172 43 17 PSTC 77 Josh Kolbach 1989 Civic Si Orange-Blk 60.922 *0.824 50.199 0.003 2.175 44 9 RES 15 Zach Albert 1995 Mazda Miata White 62.297 *0.807300 50.292 0.093 2.268 45 10 RSS 98 Patrick Washburn 2005 Lotus Elise Red 60.148 *0.837525 50.375 0.083 2.351 46 2 BS 95 Todd Cochran 2004 Honda S2000 Silver 59.634 *0.845 50.390 0.015 2.366 47 2 STF 8 Chris Perry 2000 Slow Focus Sedan Crunchy 63.406 *0.795 50.407 0.017 2.383 48 18 PCP 179 Darrell Padberg Ford mustang 58.486 *0.862 50.414 0.007 2.390 49 2 ESP 125 Tony Povletich 1994 Chevy Camaro Z28 1LE Black 59.397 *0.849 50.428 0.014 2.404 50 6 STX 89 Katie Lacey 1993 BMW 325is Green 61.051 *0.827 50.489 0.061 2.465 51 3 STF 15 Eric OSullivan 2012 Mazda3 BluishGreenish 63.517 *0.795 50.496 0.007 2.472 52 2 ASM 46 Dan Hayes 2005 Subaru STi Silver 59.753 *0.845325 50.510 0.014 2.486 53 2 FGS 66 Ken Stefancic 2005 Dodge SRT-4 ACR White 63.506 *0.795600 50.525 0.015 2.501 54 3 FFSP 9 Jeff Marshall 1998 Dodge Neon RT Red 61.856 *0.817050 50.539 0.014 2.515 55 2 XFSAE 10 Michael Rademacher 2013 University of Wisconsin-Madison FSAE White Black 51.120 *0.989 50.557 0.018 2.533 56 11 RES 5 Curtis Jones 1995 Mazda Miata White 62.752 *0.807300 50.659 0.102 2.635 57 7 STX 9 Gretchen Austin 1993 BMW 325is Green 61.288 *0.827 50.685 0.026 2.661 58 3 XSTS 9 Dan Mai 1990 unaumsed Mazda Miata blue 61.173 *0.829 50.712 0.027 2.688 59 1 STC 74 Kyle Klein 1990 honda civic si white 61.595 *0.824 50.754 0.042 2.730 60 3 STR 9 Chris Larson 2000 Honda S2000 Silver 60.564 *0.839 50.813 0.059 2.789 61 12 RDS 9 Omar Akbar-Khan 2004 BMW 330i Red 63.151 *0.805350 50.858 0.045 2.834 62 13 RES 629 Thor Groseth 1995 Mazda Miata R Black 63.012 *0.807300 50.869 0.011 2.845 63 2 DM 97 Denise Cashmore 1966 Lotus 7 - YC3 Yellow 55.426 *0.918 50.881 0.012 2.857 64 14 RSS 597 Andy Seipos 2011 Corvette GS Grey 60.778 *0.837525 50.903 0.022 2.879 65 15 RAS 643 David Finchum 1999 Chevrolet Corvette FRC Finch Federation U.F.F. Enterprise Pewter 61.806 *0.825825 51.040 0.137 3.016 66 1 CM 187 Brandon Lavender 1985 Van Diemen RF85 FF White 56.421 *0.910 51.343 0.303 3.319 67 16 RESP 300 Gregory Fox 2005 Ford Mustang GF Redfire 62.183 *0.827775 51.473 0.130 3.449 68 2 STC 511 josh sanborn 2002 ford zx2 gray 62.494 *0.824 51.495 0.022 3.471 69 17 RBS 71 Paula Scott 2006 Honda S2K Red 62.538 *0.823875 51.523 0.028 3.499 70 19 PFP 47 Mike Tews Dautson 58.751 *0.877 51.524 0.001 3.500 71 18 RES 871 Todd Roops Mazda Miata 63.875 *0.807300 51.566 0.042 3.542 72 19 RSS 59 Rob Bedalis 1990 Chevrolet Corvette White 61.588 *0.837525 51.581 0.015 3.557 73 1 SM 23 bob weir 1999 chevy z28 drk blu 59.510 *0.867 51.595 0.014 3.571 74 4 STR 95 Julie Fiedler 2008 Honda S2000 Chicane 61.567 *0.839 51.654 0.059 3.630 75 3 ASM 26 su xiong 2002 Subaru impreza wrx Red 61.176 *0.845325 51.713 0.059 3.689 76 20 RBS 94 Ian Scott 2006 Honda S2000 Red 62.819 *0.823875 51.755 0.042 3.731 77 1 BM 97 Mary Bahr 1979 LeGrand MK 18 Green 53.837 *0.962 51.791 0.036 3.767 78 21 RES 95 Michael A.
Recommended publications
  • Dolz Applicazione Listino A084 A-084 Tapa A-183 28,20 A112 A
    DOLZ APPLICAZIONE LISTINO A084 A-084 TAPA A-183 28,20 A112 A-112 SAVA JO-4 C/LARGO 59,00 A113 A-113 SAVA JO-4 C/CORTO 37,20 A115 A-115 SAVA JO-4 5730 40,60 A116 A-116 SAVA JO-4 1.000 70,60 A117 A-117 SAVA JO-4 1.000M 67,60 A121 A-121 BMC MARINA 1.5D 39,40 A122 A-122 LEYLAND SHERPA 70,60 A123 A-123 AUSTIN MARINA 62,50 A124 A-124 LEYLAND TM15/TM30 70,60 A131 A-131 ALFA 33 1.8 TD 77,20 A131ST A-131ST ALFA33 1.8TD INTER 51,60 A134 A-134 A.R.ALFETTA GT 85,00 A135 A-135 ALFA ROMEO 1750 101,00 A138 A-138 ALFA ROMEO 2.0 129,00 A139 A-139 ALFA ROMEO ALFA SUD 41,30 A140 A-140 ALFA ROMEO 164 2.0 44,60 A141 A-141 ALFA ROMEO 2.5 TD 54,60 A145 A-145 A.R.ALFETTA 1.5-1.8 55,80 A146 A-146 ALFA 75 2.5 - 3.0 91,00 A147 A-147 ALFA 33 1.8 TD 47,80 A148 A-148 ALFA 164 3.0 6V 84,00 A149 A-149 ALFA 155 1.8 - 2.0 60,50 A150 A-150 VW PASSAT 37,50 A151 A-151 VW PASSAT 35,60 A151RS A-151RS VW PASSAT DIESEL 39,50 A152 A-152 AUDI 100 GASOLINA 54,10 A153 A-153 AUDI 100 LS-GL 54,00 A154 A-154 AUDI 100 DIESEL 52,20 A158 A-158 AUDI 80-90 2000- 58,80 A159 A-159 AUDI 50 LS-50 47,60 A160 A-160 AUDI COUPE 1600- 74,30 A161 A-161 AUDI COUPE 1600 70,30 A161RS A-161RS VW PASSAT DIESEL 73,90 A162 A-162 VOLKSWAGEN LT 4X4 57,00 A164 A-164 VOLKSWAGEN POLO 1.3 48,10 A165 A-165 VOLKSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle Initial Quality in Japan Has Steadily Improved, but Satisfaction Remains Stagnant, J.D
    Vehicle Initial Quality in Japan Has Steadily Improved, but Satisfaction Remains Stagnant, J.D. Power Finds Honda Ranks Highest for Initial Quality for First Time TOKYO: 19 Aug. 2020 — While new-vehicle owners report fewer problems overall with their new vehicle this year and initial vehicle quality has further improved, more problems are reported in two areas than in previous years, according to the J.D. Power 2020 Japan Initial Quality StudySM (IQS), released today. “Initial vehicle quality in Japan has clearly improved due to efforts by every automobile manufacturer,” said Koichi Urayama, director of the automotive division at J.D. Power. “Despite those efforts, however, there’s still work to be done because customer satisfaction has not increased since 2014. It is critical that manufacturers find ways to decrease the number of reported problems with safety features and the advanced technology-related functions. Both of these areas represent emerging quality issues, and such improvements will not only increase initial quality satisfaction among current owners but also among those who switch from other brands. Presenting the market with solutions to these challenges will be the first step toward a competitive advantage strategy.” The study, now in its 10th year, examines problems experienced by owners of new 2020 model-year vehicles during the first 90 days of ownership. Initial quality is determined by the number of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality. Following are some key findings of the 2020 study: The fewest number of problems are reported since the study’s redesign in 2014: Initial quality in 2020 averages 60 PP100.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual Transmission S/N Make,Model Year Price (US$) Grade Engine Km Trans
    Trust Company Ltd., Nagoya, JAPAN TEL: +81-52-219-9024 FAX: +81-52-219-9025 EMAIL:[email protected] Manual Transmission S/N Make,Model Year Price (US$) Grade Engine Km Trans. Drs/Sts Color Chassis Handle 180968 BMW 3 SERIES 2008 6,880 ** 2.0 L Petrol 97,000 MT, 2WD 4d / 5s blue WBAVG76 RHD 182342 DAIHATSU HIJET 2012 4,700 ** 0.66 L Petrol 36,000 MT, 4WD 2d / 2s white S211P RHD 181699 DAIHATSU MIRA 2012 790 ** 0.66 L Petrol 151,000 MT, 2WD 3d / 4s white L275V RHD 182115 DAIHATSU MIRA 2008 890 ** 0.66 L Petrol 138,000 MT, 2WD 5d / 4s beige L275S RHD 182449 DAIHATSU MIRA 2011 790 ** 0.66 L Petrol 179,000 MT, 2WD 3d / 4s silver L275V RHD 179832 DAIHATSU MOVE 2007 650 ** 0.66 L Petrol 183,000 MT, 4WD 5d / 4s white L185S RHD 179697 DAIHATSU TERIOS 2001 2,200 ** 1.3 L Petrol 99,000 MT, 4WD 5d / 5s black J102G RHD 182018 DAIHATSU TERIOS 1998 1,690 ** 1.3 L Petrol 97,000 MT, 4WD 5d / 5s white/silver J100G RHD 180569 HINO DUTRO 2011 15,500 ** 4.0 L Diesel 193,000 MT, 2WD 2d / 3s white XZC710 RHD 180756 HINO DUTRO 2007 12,800 ** 4.0 L Diesel 130,000 MT, 2WD 2d / 3s white XZU554 RHD 181123 HINO DUTRO 2010 12,500 ** 4.0 L Diesel 104,000 MT, 2WD 2d / 3s white XZU508 RHD 178382 HINO RANGER 2006 12,500 ** 6.4 L Diesel 202,000 MT, 2WD 2d / 3s white FD7JKW RHD 180544 HINO RANGER 2006 20,700 ** 6.4 L Diesel 56,000 MT, 2WD 2d / 2s white FC7JJW RHD 178582 HONDA CIVIC 2002 5,500 ** 2.0 L Petrol 100,000 MT, 2WD 3d / 4s white EP3 RHD 180275 HONDA CIVIC 2008 10,900 ** 2.0 L Petrol 102,000 MT, 2WD 4d / 4s white FD2 RHD 179841 HONDA INTEGRA (ACURA INTEGRA)
    [Show full text]
  • Daihatsu Mira E:S Mini Passenger Car Undergoes Minor Model Upgrade Achieves Best Fuel Efficiency for a Gasoline Engine Vehicle*1Of 35.2 Km/L*2
    July 9, 2014 (1/3) Daihatsu Mira e:S Mini Passenger Car Undergoes Minor Model Upgrade Achieves best fuel efficiency for a gasoline engine vehicle*1of *2 35.2 km/L Mira e:S G “SA” Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. (“Daihatsu”) is pleased to announce a minor upgrade to the Mira e:S mini passenger car, which will be released nationwide on Wednesday, July 9. The Mira e:S has been gaining the support of customers in a wide range of age groups as the “third eco-friendly car” that pursues high fuel efficiency and affordability, which are the essence of a mini passenger car. With the latest refinements, the e:S technology has evolved further, achieving improved fuel efficiency. In terms of power train evolution, combustion efficiency has been improved through a higher compression ratio and the adoption of Atkinson cycle technology*3 and a dual injector. In terms of energy management evolution, regenerative power has been increased through the improvement of Eco Power Generation Control, achieving fuel efficiency of 35.2 km/L, the best for a gasoline engine vehicle in all grades of 2WD vehicles. In addition, the Black Interior Package, an option that comes with a black-based interior, including black seat upholstery, has been added to some grades, creating a high quality, relaxing interior space. Daihatsu considers high fuel efficiency and affordability to be the essential features of all mini passenger cars, and it will continue to proactively pursue these aspects. *1: As of July 9, 2014, among gasoline engine cars, excluding hybrids (based on research undertaken by Daihatsu) *2: 2WD vehicles; JC08 mode fuel efficiency (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism inspection value) *3: Internal combustion that achieves improved combustion efficiency by allowing the expansion ratio to be higher than the compression ratio (2/3) Outline ◆Through the evolution of e:S technology, fuel efficiency of 35.2 km/L has been achieved, the highest for a gasoline engine vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Daihatsu Mira Cocoa Mini Passenger Car Undergoes Minor Changes
    August 26, 2014 (1/4) Daihatsu Mira Cocoa Mini Passenger Car Undergoes Minor Changes The fun of finding a favorite vehicle by selecting from 160 different styles and plus α Mira Cocoa Plus X Interior color (Ivory x Brown) Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. is pleased to announce minor changes to the Mira Cocoa mini passenger car, which will be released nationwide on August 26. The Mira Cocoa, under the concept of “My perfect, smart and happy partner,” has been gaining the support of a large number of female customers due to its design, which makes outings enjoyable, and its compact style, offering ease of handling. With the latest minor changes, under the keywords, “Creating vehicles that suit customers’ tastes,” in addition to improvements in the attractiveness of the exterior design, the Mira Cocoa has become a vehicle that achieves the fun of selection and enables customers to express their personalities and individuality by offering 160 variations, the largest number available for a mini passenger car*1, including the selection of a total of 15 body colors*2 and 9 different interior colors*3, and by offering the plus α (special models limited to each region). Moreover, in addition to achieving a fuel efficiency of 29.0 km/L*4 through the application of e:S technology, the fundamental performance of the Mira Cocoa has been improved, including the achievement of a more comfortable ride and high driving tranquility. *1: As of August 2014; based on research undertaken by Daihatsu *2: Excluding the Cocoa L *3: Standard features of the Cocoa Plus X (including Smart Selection SN) *4: 2WD vehicles; JC08 mode fuel efficiency (2/4) Outline Creating vehicles that suit customers’ tastes ◆ In planning and development, the basic specifications were determined based on thorough research into the opinions of female customers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Market for Compact Cars
    a look at The global market for compact cars The search for fuel-saving solutions has led to a trend for acquiring smaller and lighter cars. Small compact cars, whether powered by internal combustion or electric engines, have gained and are continuing to gain market share, in both mature automobile markets such as Europe or Japan and emerging markets such as India. In Europe and in France, automotive A and B segments These cars have the highest market share in Europe, and categorize: this share has been increasing since the 1990s. Today, 4 cars out of 10 sold in Europe are in the A and B segments, I mini cars for the A segment, such as the Fiat 500, compared with 3 out of 10 in the early 1990s (Fig. 1). No Peugeot 108, Renault Twingo and Citroën C-Zero. other range has seen such growth over this period. Very compact, their length varies between 3.1 m and 3.6 m in Europe; The C segment is small family cars, the D segment large family cars, and the H segment luxury saloon cars I supermini cars or “subcompacts” for the B segment, and tourers. such as the Toyota Yaris, Citroën DS3, Renault Clio and Peugeot 208. Slightly bigger than A segment cars, they are still very easy to handle due to their Fig. 2 – Sub-A segment cars length, often under 4 meters, but their 5 seats make Tata Nano Renault Twizy them more versatile. Fig. 1 – Breakdown of the European automobile market by range of vehicles % 9 . 45% 0 4 40% Kia Pop Lumeneo Neoma % % 2 9 .
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 09 Japan Sales.Qxp
    Japan vehicle sales, 4th quarter & YTD Japan’s top 10 sellers (For selected companies) 4th qtr. 4th qtr. 12 mos. 12 mos. 4th quarter 2009 2009 2008 2009 2008 1. Toyota Prius 76,327 DOMESTIC Japan-built ...................................... 395,085 296,210 1,336,340 1,428,193 2. Honda Fit 46,564 Import .............................................. 1,772 3,526 10,079 15,142 3. Suzuki Wagon R* 39,583 Toyota Division ......................... 396,857 299,736 1,346,419 1,443,335 4. Daihatsu Move* 36,796 Japan-built ...................................... 1,667 1,372 7,914 7,300 Minivehicle ...................................... 138,751 145,346 588,301 635,164 5. Suzuki Carry/Every* 34,540 Daihatsu ................................. 140,418 146,718 596,215 642,464 6. Toyota Vitz 33,962 Hino ...................................... 6,421 8,145 24,434 40,666 7. Daihatsu Mira* 31,136 Lexus ..................................... 12,190 5,777 28,167 25,945 TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. ................ 555,886 460,376 1,995,235 2,152,410 8. Daihatsu Tanto* 29,392 Japan-built ...................................... 143,145 89,984 461,738 421,050 9. Daihatsu Hijet* 28,592 Minivehicle ...................................... 39,118 50,252 162,154 200,919 10. Honda Insight 28,427 Import .............................................. 1,291 392 1,624 2,578 HONDA MOTOR CO. .................... 183,554 140,628 625,516 624,547 *Minivehicle with engine under 660cc Japan-built ...................................... 12,072 14,700 59,436 77,823 Source: JADA (car), Zenkeijikyo (minicar) Minivehicle ...................................... 132,264 134,176 552,394 590,280 and FOURIN Inc. Import .............................................. 1,065 1,835 5,399 1,835 SUZUKI MOTOR CO. .................... 145,401 150,711 617,229 669,938 Japan-built .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • User Friendliness of Safety Features Has Large Impact on Quality and Reliability Ratings of New Vehicles, J.D
    User Friendliness of Safety Features Has Large Impact on Quality and Reliability Ratings of New Vehicles, J.D. Power Finds Daihatsu is Highest Ranked Brand Overall for Second Consecutive Year TOKYO: 21 Aug. 2019 — Making new safety features more user-friendly effects overall initial quality, as consumers indicate they are more interested than ever in purchasing vehicles with such features, according to the J.D. Power 2019 Japan Initial Quality StudySM (IQS), released today. “As additional safety features and new technologies are increasingly offered on new vehicles, consumers’ expectations and interest in them increases,” said Atsushi Kawahashi, Senior Director of the Automotive Division at J.D. Power. “Owner ratings on vehicle quality and reliability increases when new vehicles are equipped with such features and technologies. However, when owners have a problem with usability, ratings considerably decrease and may affect repurchase intentions of the brand. Improving user friendliness will not only increase owners’ satisfaction but will also reinforce their trust in such safety features and new technologies, ultimately improving their perceptions of their new vehicle.” Following are some of the key findings of the 2019 study: Overall initial quality in 2019 is on par with 2018, while some brands have fewer problems than in the past. • Initial quality in 2019 remains flat compared with 2018: New-vehicle quality in 2019 averages 66 PP100 (problems per 100 vehicles), one problem fewer than 67 PP100 in 2018. A lower PP100 indicates higher initial vehicle quality performance. There are no significant changes year over year in PP100 for individual problem areas measured in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Daihatsu Dismantles 'Toyota Way'
    JAPAN TOYOTA WAY: Members of the media are shown beneath the Toyota logo at the annual auto show in Detroit this week. The interlocking relationships between carmakers and their suppliers were the basis of Japan’s vaunted “keiretsu” system pioneered by Toyota. REUTERS/MARK BLINCH The keiretsu system, pioneered by Toyota, was once acclaimed as an ingredient in Japan Inc’s success. Could its days be numbered? Daihatsu dismantles ‘Toyota Way’ in changing auto market BY NORIHIKO SHIROUZU SPECIAL REPORT 1 DAIHATSU DISMANTLES TOYOTA WAY IKEDA, JAPAN, JANUARY 14, 2015 hen Daihatsu Motor Co launched the Mira e:S mini- Wcar in 2011, the Toyota affiliate thought it had found a model for emerging markets. The Mira e:S - e for eco, S for smart - was capable of going 30 kilometers on a liter of gasoline (72 mpg) for a sticker price of just 795,000 yen, or $6,637. And indeed, the car was a hit, super-charging Daihatsu’s earnings. A number of improvements – in manu- facturing, engineering, procurement – went into the car. But the real secret to success, says Kosuke Shiramizu, Daihatsu’s chair- man at the time, lay in taking something out of the company’s business model: the vaunted Japanese “keiretsu” system. Shiramizu, now a Daihatsu advisor, says BURNISHING IMAGE: Daihatsu’s redesigned Mir e:S was cheaper and more economical than many of Daihatsu shaved off roughly $1,000 in the its rivals in the micro-minicar market. REUTERS/YUYA SHINO manufacturing costs of the car by disman- tling its keiretsu - an informal but close interlocking business relationship between The Toyota way is the deal with the global auto market’s seismic a manufacturer and its suppliers, cement- high-cost way.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Classification
    Car classification Car classification is subjective since many vehicles fall into multiple categories or do not fit well into any. Not all car types are common in all countries and names for the same vehicle can differ by region. Furthermore, some descriptions may be interpreted differently in different places. Broadly speaking, there are a set of classifications which are widely understood in North America, and another set which are somewhat understood in English-speaking contexts in Europe. Some terms borrowed from non-English languages may have different meanings when used in their native language. Classification systems The following are the most commonly used classifications. Where applicable, the equivalent Euro NCAP classifications are shown. Car rental companies often use the ACRISS Car Classification Code. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has another set of classification rules based on interior passenger and cargo volumes. A similar set of classes is used by the Canadian EPA. In Australia, the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries publishes its own classifications. Car classification American English British English Segment Euro NCAP Examples Microcar Microcar, Bubble car - - BMW Isetta, Smart Fortwo - City car A-segment Daewoo Matiz, Renault Twingo, Toyota Aygo, VW Lupo Supermini Subcompact car Supermini B-segment Hyundai Accent, Ford Fiesta, Opel Corsa, Suzuki Swift Compact car Small family car C-segment Small family car Ford Focus, Toyota Corolla, Opel Astra, VW Golf Mid-size car Large family car
    [Show full text]
  • Gran Turismo 5 As of Today Sony Has Announced the Full Gran Turismo 5
    Gran Turismo 5 As of today Sony has announced the full Gran Turismo 5 car list. It consists of 10000 cars. At launch it will only have 340 cars while the others will be developed in the future. Polyphony Digital will also develop cars for individual clients. That means in the future we could have any car put into the game for a special price. Of course the damage model will be not present in GT5. Below we are attaching the nearly official car list of GT5. Be ready for more info in the close future! 1G RACING/ROSSION AUTOMOTIVE Rossion Q1 Supercar '08 9FF FAHRZEUGTECHNIK 9ff [Cayman S] CCR42 {4.1L, 420hp} '06 9ff [996] 9fT1 Turbo '03 9ff [996] 9f V400 '04 9ff [997] Aero '05 9ff [997] Carrera Turbo Stage I '06 9ff [997] Carrera Turbo Stage II '06 9ff [977] Carrera Turbo Stage III '06 9ff [997] Carrera Turbo Cabrio Stage III '06 9ff [997] Cabrio [650hp] '06 9ff [Carrera GT] =unnamed= '06 9ff [997] TCR84 '07 9ff [997 Turbo] TRC 91 '07 A:LEVEL A:Level BIG '03 A:Level Volga V12 Coupe '03 A:Level Volga V8 Convertible '06 A:Level Impression '05 A&L RACING A&L Racing S2000 '04 AB FLUG Toyota Supra 80 ' Nissan Fairlady Z32 '89 Nissan Skyline GTR R32 ' Nissan Skyline GTR R33 ' Nissan Skyline GTR R34 ' Toyota Supra S900 '01 Toyota Supra 70 ' Mazda RX7 [FD3S] ' Toyota Aristo 161 ' Mazda RX8 ' Toyota Supra Tamura Veil Black S900 ' Toyota Supra Zefi:r MA04S ' ABARTH Abarth Simca ' Abarth Stola Monotipo Concept '98 Abarth 1000 Bialbero ' Abarth OT850 ' Abarth OT1000 ' Abarth OTR1000 ' Abarth OT1300/124 ' Abarth OT1600 ' Abarth OT2000 ' ABD RACING ABD
    [Show full text]
  • Daihatsu and Toyota Announce New Cooperative Business in Indonesia
    September 19, 2012 Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. Toyota Motor Corporation Daihatsu and Toyota Announce New Cooperative Business in Indonesia – Innovative, New Compact Daihatsu and Toyota Models to Open New Market– –Daihatsu to Supply Toyota Under OEM Arrangement– Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. (Daihatsu) and Toyota Motor Corporation (Toyota) announce a new cooperative business in Indonesia, under which the two companies are to respectively market a new Daihatsu-brand and Toyota-brand compact car there. The Daihatsu “Ayla” and Toyota “Agya” have been designed in consideration of the Low Cost Green Car (LCGC) policy, which is currently under Indonesian government review. Daihatsu is to supply Toyota with the Agya under an OEM arrangement. Daihatsu Ayla Toyota Agya Vehicle planning and development is to be carried out by Daihatsu, while production is to take place at the new Suryacipta, Indonesia factory of P.T. Astra Daihatsu Motor, an Indonesian subsidiary of Daihatsu. Both the vehicles are planned for display at the Indonesia International Motor Show (September 20-30, 2012) as models planned for sale in Indonesia. As ASEAN countries increase their importance as core markets for growth, Indonesia, with its continuous high growth, is an extremely important market for Daihatsu and Toyota. Since the start of production in Indonesia in 1968 for Daihatsu and 1971 for Toyota, both companies have leveraged their strengths to deliver optimum vehicles such as the Daihatsu “Xenia”, Toyota “Avanza”, Daihatsu “Terios” and Toyota “Rush” to consumers in Indonesia, as well as continuing to contribute to motorization and the development of the automobile industry. The two new vehicles are based on the expertise cultivated for the Daihatsu “Mira e:S”—representing part of Daihatsu’s efforts in making fuel-efficient, affordable, compact cars.
    [Show full text]