DOCSLIB.ORG

Next Generation European Research Vessels Current Status and Foreseeable Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EUROPEAN Next Generation Position Paper 25 MARINE BOARD European Research Vessels Next generation European Research Vessels Current Status and Foreseeable Evolution European Marine Board IVZW Belgian Enterprise Number: 0650.608.890 Wandelaarkaai 7 I 8400 Ostend I Belgium Tel.: +32(0)59 34 01 63 I Fax: +32(0)59 34 01 65 E-mail: [email protected] www.marineboard.eu EMB_PP25_Research_Vessels_binnenwerk_v9.indd 1 18/11/19 16:57 NEXT GENERATION EUROPEAN RESEARCH VESSELS European Marine Board The European Marine Board provides a pan-European platform for its member organizations to develop common priorities, to advance marine research, and to bridge the gap between science and policy in order to meet future marine science challenges and opportunities. The European Marine Board was established in 1995 to facilitate enhanced cooperation between European marine science organizations towards the development of a common vision on the strategic research priorities for marine science in Europe. Members are either major national marine or oceanographic institutes, research funding agencies, or national consortia of universities with a strong marine research focus. In 2019, the European Marine Board represents 33 Member Organizations from 18 countries. The Board provides the essential components for transferring knowledge for leadership in marine research in Europe. Adopting a strategic role, the European Marine Board serves its member organizations by providing a forum within which marine research policy advice to national agencies and to the European Commission is developed, with the objective of promoting the establishment of the European Research Area. www.marineboard.eu European Marine Board Member Organizations UNIVERSITÉS MARINES Irish Marine Universities Consortium National Research Council of Italy MASTS 2 POSITION PAPER 25 Next Generation European Research Vessels Current Status and Foreseeable Evolution European Marine Board IVZW Position Paper 25 This Position Paper is a result of the work of the European Marine Board Expert Working Group on Next Generation European Research Vessels (WG Research Vessels, see Annex 1), co-organized with the European Research Vessel Operators (ERVO – see Box 1.1 for more information). Coordinating Authors, and WG Chair and Co-Chair Per Nieuwejaar and Valérie Mazauric Contributing Authors Christian Betzler, Mafalda Carapuço, André Cattrijsse, Franco Coren, Juanjo Danobeitia, Colin Day, Aodhan Fitzgerald, Stefan Florescu, Jose Ignacio Diaz, Michael Klages, Erica Koning, Olivier Lefort, Giuseppe Magnifico, Øystein Mikelborg, Lieven Naudts Additional Contribution Riccardo Codiglia, Michele Rebesco, Andrea Caburlotto, Luc van Hoof, Lorenza Evangelista, Jan Opderbecke Series Editor Sheila JJ Heymans Publication Editors Paula Kellett, Cláudia Viegas, Britt Alexander, Joke Coopman, Ángel Muñiz Piniella External Reviewers Glenn Nolan, Geraint West, Bruce Appelgate, Rob Christie Internal Review Process The content of this document has been subject to internal review, editorial support and approval by the European Marine Board Member Organizations, the membership of the European Research Vessel Operators (ERVO) and the Ocean Facilities Exchange Group (OFEG). Suggested reference Nieuwejaar, P., Mazauric, V., Betzler, C., Carapuço, M., Cattrijsse, A., Coren, F., Danobeitia, J., Day, C., Fitzgerald, A., Florescu, S., Ignacio Diaz, J., Klages, M., Koning, E., Lefort, O., Magnifico, G., Mikelborg, Ø., Naudts, L. (2019) Next Generation European Research Vessels: Current Status and Foreseeable Evolution. Heymans, JJ., Kellett, P., Viegas, C., Alexander, B., Coopman, J., Muñiz Piniella, Á. [Eds.] Position Paper 25 of the European Marine Board, Ostend, Belgium. 140pp. ISBN: 978-94-92043-79-5 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3477893 www.marineboard.eu [email protected] Design Zoeck October 2019 Disclaimer: To our knowledge, all photos presented in this publication have appropriate permission and credits. If you find an error, please inform the EMB Secretariat. 3 NEXT GENERATION EUROPEAN RESEARCH VESSELS Foreword Many of the global challenges facing the world today – climate change, food and water security, health and well-being, and economic development – are driving the ever-greater need for science to help understand and ultimately address these challenges. The natural, and in particular the marine sciences, have a significant role to play, and the research vessel fleet is called upon to deliver data and support globally important scientific research. Science has used ships as instruments for research since at least the 1700s, and the evolution of usage from instrument to laboratory can be traced through history. Today’s research vessels have been shaped to become complete research support platforms by the demand for scientific knowledge, fast-paced technological development and the increasing need for new ocean observations. Given the context in which Europe’s research vessel fleet is now operating, and the rapid developments in technology such as smart sensors and autonomy seen in recent years, it was timely to review the current status of the fleet and its ability to deliver the data that is needed. It is more than 10 years since the first EMB Position Paper on research vessels was published, and a lot has changed in that time. In particular, new research frontiers have arisen, especially in the deep sea and Polar regions, placing a new set of demands on the capabilities of vessels. This Position Paper provides a review of the current European research vessel fleet, its capabilities and equipment, assessing its ability to support science across the globe now and into the future. It also takes a wider vision, assessing the importance of these vessels in the ocean and earth observing landscape. This review includes not only technological but also human capabilities, looking at training needs for crew and technicians to ensure they can continue to deliver on critical science needs. It also considers the ways in which the current European fleet is managed. This Position Paper sets out recommendations for how the fleet will need to develop in the future to ensure that it will continue to provide the same high level of support to science globally, as well as highlighting ways in which management could be made more efficient. It is aimed at national- and European-level policy makers and funders, as well as the marine science community and the research vessel operator community. On behalf of the EMB membership, I would like to sincerely thank the members of the EMB Research Vessels expert working group (Annex 1) for their enthusiasm and drive in producing this publication. I would particularly like to thank working group Chair Per Nieuwejaar and co-Chair Valérie Mazauric for their dedication to delivering this excellent document, as well as the chapter leaders Lieven Naudts, Olivier Lefort, André Cattrijsse, Erica Koning and Giuseppe Magnifico. I would also like to thank ERVO for proposing to revisit this topic and for their collaboration in producing this document. Finally, I note with thanks the efforts of the EMB Secretariat in ensuring that this publication was delivered successfully, in particular Paula Kellett, Sheila JJ Heymans and Cláudia Viegas. I hope that this publication will help carry the European research vessel fleet into a new and exciting era of exploration, which will inspire interest in science across wider society. Gilles Lericolais Chair, European Marine Board IVZW October 2019 4 POSITION PAPER 25 Table of Contents Foreword 4 Executive Summary 6 1. Introduction 8 2. Research vessels as a platform and interface for ocean technology 12 2.1 Current status and foreseeable evolution of the European research vessel fleet 14 2.2 A wide range of portable and exchangeable associated instruments 27 2.3 Current status of the European research vessel fleet capabilities 31 3. Deep sea 52 3.1 The deep-sea in the context of research vessels 54 3.2 Concept of deep-sea research vessels 54 3.3 Working examples of today’s deep-sea cruise activities 56 3.4 Current capabilities of the European deep-sea research fleet and trends for its evolution 59 4. Polar regions 64 4.1 Current capabilities of Polar research vessels 66 4.2 Operational and scientific requirements for Polar research vessels 74 4.3 Towards strengthened and enhanced collaboration, access and interoperability 77 4.4 Future trends 78 5. Towards an end-to-end European Ocean Observing System (EOOS): A research vessel perspective 80 5.1 Where do research vessels sit in the EOOS landscape? 82 5.2 Engaging with the EOOS process 84 6. Training the next generation of professionals 88 6.1 Sea-going research in the 21st century: changing science and personnel skill requirements 90 6.2 Landscape of training initiatives 90 6.3 Survey set-up and results 92 6.4 Interpretation of survey results 93 7. Management processes in the countries and partnerships developed in Europe 96 7.1 Current status of research vessel management processes 98 7.2 Collaborations and partnerships at European level 102 8. Looking ahead 106 References 108 Glossary 110 List of Abbreviations 115 Annex 1 Members of the European Marine Board Working Group on Next Generation Research Vessels (WG Research Vessels) 118 Annex 2 Additional contributing authors 118 Annex 3 Stakeholder interaction 119 Annex 4 European research vessel fleet 122 Annex 4.1 Current European research vessel fleet (2019) 122 Annex 4.2 European research vessel fleet as presented in EMB Position Paper 10 (2007) 125 Annex 5 Large EXchangeable
Recommended publications
  • Cloud and Precipitation Properties from Ground-Based Remote-Sensing Instruments in East Antarctica

    Cloud and Precipitation Properties from Ground-Based Remote-Sensing Instruments in East Antarctica

    The Cryosphere, 9, 285–304, 2015 www.the-cryosphere.net/9/285/2015/ doi:10.5194/tc-9-285-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Cloud and precipitation properties from ground-based remote-sensing instruments in East Antarctica I. V. Gorodetskaya1, S. Kneifel2,3, M. Maahn2, K. Van Tricht1, W. Thiery1, J. H. Schween2, A. Mangold4, S. Crewell2, and N. P. M. Van Lipzig1 1Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium 2Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany 3Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 4Observations Department, Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Uccle, Belgium Correspondence to: I. V. Gorodetskaya ([email protected]) Received: 6 June 2014 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 28 July 2014 Revised: 23 December 2014 – Accepted: 5 January 2015 – Published: 11 February 2015 Abstract. A new comprehensive cloud–precipitation– Large accumulation events (> 10 mm w.e. day−1) during the meteorological observatory has been established at Princess radar-measurement period of 26 months were always associ- Elisabeth base, located in the escarpment zone of Dronning ated with snowfall, but at the same time other snowfall events Maud Land (DML), East Antarctica. The observatory con- did not always lead to accumulation. The multiyear deploy- sists of a set of ground-based remote-sensing instruments ment of a precipitation radar in Antarctica allows for assess- (ceilometer, infrared pyrometer and vertically profiling pre- ing the contribution of the snowfall to the local SMB and cipitation radar) combined with automatic weather station comparing it to the other SMB components.
  • EMB PP25 Research Vessels

    EMB PP25 Research Vessels

    EUROPEAN Next generation Position Paper 25 MARINE BOARD European Research Vessels Next generation European Research Vessels Current status and Foreseeable Evolution Cover Photo: View from the L'Atalante afterdeck while the ship is maneuvering. The L'Atalante is a research vessel of the French oceanographic fleet operated by Ifremer. This operation named Cassiopée, took place in the Pacific Ocean in 2015. Credit: © Ifremer/Ird - N. Lamande European Marine Board IVZW Belgian Enterprise Number: 0650.608.890 Wandelaarkaai 7 I 8400 Ostend I Belgium Tel.: +32(0)59 34 01 63 I Fax: +32(0)59 34 01 65 E-mail: [email protected] www.marineboard.eu EMB_PP25_Research_Vessels_cover_11mm.indd 1-3 17/10/19 21:51 NEXT GENERATION EUROPEAN RESEARCH VESSELS European Marine Board The European Marine Board provides a pan-European platform for its member organizations to develop common priorities, to advance marine research, and to bridge the gap between science and policy in order to meet future marine science challenges and opportunities. The European Marine Board was established in 1995 to facilitate enhanced cooperation between European marine science organizations towards the development of a common vision on the strategic research priorities for marine science in Europe. Members are either major national marine or oceanographic institutes, research funding agencies, or national consortia of universities with a strong marine research focus. In 2019, the European Marine Board represents 33 Member Organizations from 18 countries. The Board provides the essential components for transferring knowledge for leadership in marine research in Europe. Adopting a strategic role, the European Marine Board serves its member organizations by providing a forum within which marine research policy advice to national agencies and to the European Commission is developed, with the objective of promoting the establishment of the European Research Area.
  • IRSO 2019 Agenda (Final V11)

    IRSO 2019 Agenda (Final V11)

    2019 IRSO 32nd Meeting Agenda - October 7-11, 2019 Host- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Hobart, Tasmania Meeting venue: Hotel Grand Chancellor, 1 Davey Street, Hobart Thursday 3rd October-2019 – Brisbane, Queensland, Optional Tour of RV Investigator – Ben Arthur (CSIRO) has emailed details to those of you who have indicated you will attend. Monday 7th October – Hobart Time Event Comments Topic - “From Paper to Platform” An overview of MFP Software 13:00 - 15:30 Workshop - Optional Workshop located at CSIRO, 3-4 Castray Esplanade Hobart A chance to catch up with other members 16:00 - 17:30 Pre-Registration & afternoon tea icebreaker Harbour View Mezzanine Level - Hotel Grand Chancellor Please be prompt 17:45 - 18:00 Bus departs Hotel Grand Chancellor Harbour View Mezzanine Level - Hotel Grand Chancellor Drinks and canapes provided 18:00 - 19:00 Welcome Reception – Government House Dress code - Suit or jacket and tie for men and smart dress/suit for women. 19:00 - 19:15 Bus returns to Hotel Grand Chancellor Free evening V11 Day1 IRSO Meeting –Tuesday 8th October-2019 Duration Time Theme Topic Owner Comments (Mins) 08:00 30 Registration Registration - Mezzanine Level – Grand Chancellor CSIRO 08:30 5 IRSO Day 1 - Welcome and admin matters Erica Koning/Greg Foothead 08:35 5 Welcome to Hobart - Introduction to hosts CSIRO - Toni Moate 08:40 15 Tasmanian Aboriginal Council Welcome to participants Toni Moate Opening of 32nd IRSO and 08:55 15 Round table introduction of participants All Business 09:10 5 Adoption
  • Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson Ship Specifications

    Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson Ship Specifications

    VESSELS SUPPORTING OCEAN EXPLORATION AND RESEARCH Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson The R/V Thomas G. Thompson is owned by the U.S. Navy Office of Naval Research and is operated by the Ship Specifications School of Oceanography at the University of Washington. The Thompson measures 274 feet in Length: 273 ft (Global Class) length and draws 19 feet with a full load. Normal Draft: 17 ft cruising speed for the ship is 11 knots. Speed: 11 knots Range: 11,300 nm Endurance: 60 days Core Capabilities Berthing: 22 crew, 38 mission personnel The Thompson is equipped for multidisciplinary Commissioned: 1991 research projects involving large science parties. The Sonar Systems: 30 kHz Kongsberg EM 302 vessel can berth up to 36 scientific personnel, 21 multibeam sonar, 3.5 kHz Knudsen 3260 sub‐ officers and crew, and two marine technicians. bottom profiler, ADCP Laboratory space includes a large dry lab, wet lab, two Other Capabilities: Designed for interoperability bioanalytical labs, and a “hydro” lab. The hydro lab of projects, including full ocean depth CTDs, AUVs, is where scientists typically direct any ROV and AUV and deep ocean ROVs operations. The Thompson has three winches, three cranes, and an A‐Frame for launching scientific equipment. It is also equipped with an EM 302 multibeam sonar system, sub‐bottom profiler, ADCP system, and CTD/rosette. A number of ROV and AUV systems have been deployed from Thompson. OER Use Thompson is one of the primary vessels that OER has used to support major expeditions in remote regions of the Pacific Ocean. The vast majority of these expeditions were identified through the competitive peer review proposal process.
  • Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004

    Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004

    Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004 Institute of the North • U.S. Arctic Research Commission • International Arctic Science Committee Arctic Ocean Marine Routes This map is a general portrayal of the major Arctic marine routes shown from the perspective of Bering Strait looking northward. The official Northern Sea Route encompasses all routes across the Russian Arctic coastal seas from Kara Gate (at the southern tip of Novaya Zemlya) to Bering Strait. The Northwest Passage is the name given to the marine routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans along the northern coast of North America that span the straits and sounds of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Three historic polar voyages in the Central Arctic Ocean are indicated: the first surface shop voyage to the North Pole by the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Arktika in August 1977; the tourist voyage of the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Sovetsky Soyuz across the Arctic Ocean in August 1991; and, the historic scientific (Arctic) transect by the polar icebreakers Polar Sea (U.S.) and Louis S. St-Laurent (Canada) during July and August 1994. Shown is the ice edge for 16 September 2004 (near the minimum extent of Arctic sea ice for 2004) as determined by satellite passive microwave sensors. Noted are ice-free coastal seas along the entire Russian Arctic and a large, ice-free area that extends 300 nautical miles north of the Alaskan coast. The ice edge is also shown to have retreated to a position north of Svalbard. The front cover shows the summer minimum extent of Arctic sea ice on 16 September 2002.
  • The Australian Naval Architect

    The Australian Naval Architect

    THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 HMAS Adelaide preparing to embark United States Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles during Exercise Rim of the Pacific 18 (RIMPAC 2018), Hawaii, in July. HMAS Adelaide unexpectedly took a lead role in the amphibious phase of RIMPAC when the US Navy assault ship planned for that role suffered mechanical problems and remained in Pearl Harbour for most of the exercise. HMAS Adelaide led HMA Ships Success, Melbourne and Toowoomba across the Pacific to take part in this major exercise which involved 25 nations, 46 surface ships, five submarines, 17 land forces, and more than 200 aircraft and 25 000 personnel. This major international exercise is held every two years (RAN photograph) THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Journal of The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (Australian Division) Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 Cover Photo: CONTENTS An impression of BAE Systems’ Global Com- 2 From the Division President bat Ship — Australia, selected as the preferred 3 Editorial design for Australia’s new frigates 4 Letter to the Editor (Image courtesy Department of Defence) 4 Coming Events The Australian Naval Architect is published four times per 5 News from the Sections year. All correspondence and advertising copy should be 15 Classification Society News sent to: The Editor 17 From the Crows Nest The Australian Naval Architect 18 General News c/o RINA PO Box No. 462 36 The Acquisition of a Multi-role Aviation Jamison Centre, ACT 2614 Training Vessel for the Royal Australian AUSTRALIA Navy — Alex Robbins email: [email protected] 39 Upgrade or Replace: A Cost Comparison The deadline for the next edition of The Australian Na- val Architect (Vol.
  • Document View

    Document View

    Document View http://proquest.umi.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/pqdlink?index=1&s... Databases selected: Multiple databases... Salmon farms destroying wild salmon populations in Canada, Europe: study ALISON AULD . Canadian Press NewsWire . Toronto: Feb 11, 2008. Abstract (Summary) The authors, including the late Halifax biologist Ransom Myers, claim the study is the first of its kind to take an international view of stock sizes in countries that have significant salmon aquaculture industries. The paper didn't look to the causes of the declines, which have been discussed in a series of studies over the last decade that have linked disease, interbreeding of escaped salmon and lice from farmed fish with reductions. Full Text (618 words) Copyright Canadian Press Feb 11, 2008 HALIFAX _ Salmon farming operations have reduced wild salmon populations by up to 70 per cent in several areas around the world and are threatening the future of the endangered stocks, according a new scientific study. The research by two Canadian marine biologists showed dramatic declines in the abundance of wild salmon populations whose migration takes them past salmon farms in Canada, Ireland and Scotland. ``Our estimates are that they reduced the survival of wild populations by more than half,'' Jennifer Ford, lead author of the study published Monday in the Public Library of Science journal, said in Halifax. ``Less than half of the juvenile salmon from those populations that would have survived to come back and reproduce actually come back because they're killed by some mechanism that has to do with salmon farming.'' The authors, including the late Halifax biologist Ransom Myers, claim the study is the first of its kind to take an international view of stock sizes in countries that have significant salmon aquaculture industries.
  • Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Cruise News E/V Nautilus Telepresence Exploration of the U.S

    Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Cruise News E/V Nautilus Telepresence Exploration of the U.S

    Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Welcome to the 14th edition of Deep-Sea Life (a little later than anticipated… such is life). As always there is bound to be something in here for everyone. Illustrated by stunning photography throughout, learn about the deep-water canyons of Lebanon, remote Pacific Island seamounts, deep coral habitats of the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico, Southeast USA and the North Atlantic (with good, bad and ugly news), first trials of BioCam 3D imaging technology (very clever stuff), new deep pelagic and benthic discoveries from the Bahamas, high-risk explorations under ice in the Arctic (with a spot of astrobiology thrown in), deep-sea fauna sensitivity assessments happening in the UK and a new photo ID guide for mesopelagic fish. Read about new projects to study unexplored areas of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Azores Plateau, plans to develop a water-column exploration programme, and assessment of effects of ice shelf collapse on faunal assemblages in the Antarctic. You may also be interested in ongoing projects to address and respond to governance issues and marine conservation. It’s all here folks! There are also reports from past meetings and workshops related to deep seabed mining, deep-water corals, deep-water sharks and rays and information about upcoming events in 2020. Glance over the many interesting new papers for 2019 you may have missed, the scientist profiles, job and publishing opportunities and the wanted section – please help your colleagues if you can. There are brief updates from the Deep- Ocean Stewardship Initiative and for the deep-sea ecologists amongst you, do browse the Deep-Sea Biology Society president’s letter.
  • Acanthistius Patachonicus

    Acanthistius Patachonicus

    456 NOAA First U.S. Commissioner National Marine Fishery Bulletin established 1881 of Fisheries and founder Fisheries Service of Fishery Bulletin Abstract—The Argentine sea bass Early life history of the Argentine sea bass (Acanthistius patachonicus) is one of the most conspicuous and abundant (Acanthistius patachonicus) (Pisces: Serranidae) species in the rocky-reef fish assem- blage of Northern Patagonia, which 1 sustains important recreational Lujan Villanueva Gomila (contact author) and commercial activities, such as Martín. D. Ehrlich2,3 scuba diving, hook-and-line fish- Leonardo A. Venerus1 ing, and spear fishing. We describe the morphological features of eggs, Email address for contact author: [email protected] larvae, and posttransition juveniles of A. patachonicus and summarize 1 abundance and distribution data Centro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT) for larvae collected on the Argen- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) tine shelf (between ~40°S and 44°S). Boulevard Brown 2915 Eggs and yolk-sac larvae came from Puerto Madryn an in vitro fertilization experiment. Chubut, U9120ACD Argentina Larger larvae were distinguished by 2 Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP) relevant morphological features, in- P.O. Box 175 cluding the development of the oper- Mar del Plata cular complex and head spination, Buenos Aires, B7602HSA Argentina meristics, and pigmentation pattern. 3 Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA) The early stages of A. patachonicus CONICET are similar to those of the koester Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (A. sebastoides) and of the western Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) wirrah (A. serratus), the other 2 spe- Intendente Güiraldes 2160 cies of Acanthistius whose larval de- Ciudad Universitaria velopment has been described.
  • 20 Years of the German Small-Scale Bottom Trawl Survey (GSBTS): a Review

    20 Years of the German Small-Scale Bottom Trawl Survey (GSBTS): a Review

    Senckenbergiana maritima 37 (1) 13 – 82 Frankfurt am Main 30.03.2007 20 years of the German Small-Scale Bottom Trawl Survey (GSBTS): A review Siegfried Ehrich, Sara Adlerstein, Uwe Brockmann, Jens Floeter, Stefan Garthe, Hilmar Hinz, Ingrid Kröncke, Hermann Neumann, Henning Reiss, Anne F. Sell, Manfred Stein, Vanessa Stelzenmüller, Christoph Stransky, Axel Temming, Gerd Wegner & Gerd-Peter Zauke With 50 Figures, 18 Tables, and 1 Appendix Keywords: fish assemblages, predator-prey interactions, geostatistics, benthos, seabirds, nutrients, hydrography, temporal variation, sampling method, scale, survey design, IBTS, North Sea Abstract [Ehrich. S. et al. (2007): 20 years of the German Small-Scale Bottom Trawl Survey (GSBTS): A review. – Senckenbergiana maritima, 37 (1): 13 – 82, 50 Figs., 18 Tabs., 1 App., Frankfurt a. M.] The German Small-scale Bottom Trawl Survey (GSBTS) was initiated in 1987 in order to provide com- plementary investigations to the International Bottom Trawl Survey (IBTS) in the North Sea, using the same methodology but focussing high-intensity sampling on selected survey areas. Over the last 20 years, the initial number of 4 survey areas (10 ×eschweizerbartxxx 10 sng- nautical miles; “Boxes”) has been increased to 12, which are distributed over the entire North Sea. This paper describes the survey methods of the GSBTS, summarizes the scientific outcome of the first 20 years, and suggests that international fisheries research institutions would join the GSBTS. The major outcomes of the survey include to date: – Documentation changes in the distribution of fish species and in species assemblages (e.g. changes in species richness, shifts in the southern species component). – Geostatistical evaluation of GSBTS data.
  • Supplement Annual Report 2013.Indd

    Supplement Annual Report 2013.Indd

    Dissertations 0221/8/03/T03006 Adrian-Martinez, S., …., van Haren, H., et al. A fi rst search for coincident gravi- Aguiar-González, B. Breeze-forced oscillations and strongly nonlinear tide- tational waves and high energy neutrinos using LIGO, Virgo and ANTARES generated internal solitons. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, data from 2007. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, issue 06, 240 pp. article id. 008, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/06/008. Andresen, H. Size-dependent predation risk for young bivalves. VU University Adrian-Martinez, S., ….. van Haren, H., et al. First search for neutrinos in corre- Amsterdam, 154 pp. lation with gamma-ray bursts with the ANTARES neutrino telescope. Journal Balke, T. Establishment of biogeomorphic ecosystems. A study on mangrove of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, issue 03, 1 – 14, doi:10.1088/1475- and salt marsh pioneer vegetation. Radboud University Nijmegen, 177 pp. 7516/2013/03/006 Camphuysen, C.J. A Historical ecology of two closely related gull species (Lari- Adrian-Martinez, S., …..., van Haren, H., et al. Search for a correlation between dae): multiple adaptations to a man-made environment. Groningen Univer- antares neutrinos and Pierre Auger observatory UHECRs arrival directions. sity, 421 pp. Astrophysical Journal 774, 19, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/19. Lengger, S.K. Production and preservation of archaeal glycerol dibiphytanyl Adrian-Martinez, S.,……. van Haren, H., et al. Measurement of the atmospheric glycerol tetraethers as intact polar lipids in marine sediments: Implications QP energy spectrum from 100 GeV to 200 TeV with the ANTARES telescope. for their use in microbial ecology and TEX86 paleothermometry.
  • Evaluation of Shipbuilding Cadicam Systems (Phase I)

    Evaluation of Shipbuilding Cadicam Systems (Phase I)

    Final Report EVALUATION OF SHIPBUILDING CADICAM SYSTEMS (PHASE I) Submitted to: U.S. Navy by: National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. San Diego, CA 92186 Project Director: John Horvath Principal Investigator: Richard C. Moore October 1996 Technical Report Documentaition Page- 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Waiog No. I I 4. Title and Subtitle I 5. Repon Date October 14. 1996 Evaluation of Shipbuilding CADICAM Systems 6. Performing Organization C e (Phase I) '32%'2.7 8. Performing Organization Report Ilo. 7. Author(s) Richard C. Moore UMTRI-96-35 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 11. Contracl or Grant No. 290 1 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, .Michigan 48 109-2150 PQ# MU7.56606-D - 13. Typ of Report and Period Coverud 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. 28th St. & Harbor ~r. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code San Diego, CA 92 1 13 US. Navy 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report is the Phase I final report of the National Shipbuilding Research F'rogram (NSRP) project (Project Number 4-94-1) to evaluate world-class shipbuilders' existing CADICAMICIM system implementations. Five U.S. shipyards participated in this study along with personnel from University of Michigan, Proteus Engineering, and Cybo Robots. Project participants have backgrounds in design, computer-aided design (CAD), n~anufacturingprocesses, computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), production planning, and computer-integrated manufacturing/management (CIM). The results of this evaluation provided the basis for the CADICAMICIM Workshop presented in conjunction with the 1996 Ship Production Symposium, and will be used as background in Phase I1 of the project to develop requirements for future shipbuilding CADICAMICIM systems.