DOCSLIB.ORG

Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line Project, DOE/EA-1960

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line Project, DOE/EA-1960 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2013-0052-EA DOE/EA-1960 June 28, 2013 Townsite Solar Project Transmission Line PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District Office Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 702-515-5000 Office 702-515-5010 Fax Environmental Assessment for the Townsite Solar Project DOE/EA-1960 DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2013-0052 EA N-91290 Prepared For U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District Office Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV Prepared by: 8250 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89117 June 28, 2013 Townsite Solar Project Environmental Assessment Contents Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Scope of Analysis.................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 BLM’s Purpose and Need for the Action .............................................................................. 1 1.1.3 BLM Decisions to be Made .................................................................................................. 2 1.1.4 Western’s Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 2 1.1.5 Western’s Decisions to be Made ........................................................................................... 2 1.2 Relationship to Laws, Regulations, Policies, and Other Plans...................................................... 4 1.3 Supplemental Authorities .............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Identifying Information ................................................................................................................. 6 2 Proposed Project and Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Proposed Project ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Non-federal Connected Action ..................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Alternative A1 ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Alternative A2 ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.3 Alternative A3 ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.4 Alternative B ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.5 No Action Alternative ......................................................................................................... 11 2.3.6 Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ........................................................... 11 2.4 Proposed Project Facilities .......................................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Site Preparation and Mobilization Activities ...................................................................... 15 2.4.2 Waste and Hazardous Materials Management .................................................................... 15 2.4.3 Surface Reclamation ........................................................................................................... 16 2.4.4 Best Management Practices ................................................................................................ 16 2.5 Proposed Project Construction Schedule .................................................................................... 16 2.5.1 Operations and Maintenance ............................................................................................... 17 2.5.2 Decommissioning................................................................................................................ 17 3 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Measures ............................. 19 3.1 Proposed Project General Setting ............................................................................................... 19 3.2 Air Quality and Climate .............................................................................................................. 20 3.2.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 20 Townsite Solar Project Environmental Assessment Contents 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 22 3.2.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 25 3.3 Geology, Minerals, and Soils ...................................................................................................... 27 3.3.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 27 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 28 3.3.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 28 3.4 Water Resources ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 29 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 30 3.4.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 31 3.5 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................... 32 3.5.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 32 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 33 3.5.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 34 3.6 Special Status Vegetation............................................................................................................ 36 3.6.1 Existing Condition .............................................................................................................. 36 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 36 3.6.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 37 3.7 Wildlife ....................................................................................................................................... 38 3.7.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 38 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 38 3.7.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 39 3.8 Special Status Wildlife Species................................................................................................... 40 3.8.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 40 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 42 3.8.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 46 3.9 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 50 3.9.1 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 50 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 51 3.9.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 51 3.10 Visual Resources ......................................................................................................................... 52 3.10.1 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Transmission Discussion
    Section 1:4: ExecutiveStrategic SummaryTransmission Discussion Strategic Discussion Section 4 SECTION 4: NEAC STRATEGIC TRANSMISSION DISCUSSION 4.1 SECTION PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to describe and discuss the methodology, rationale, and technical assessments utilized to determine the transmission export projects presented in this report. In order to provide an overall view of the process, this section summarizes the chronological process that was completed to reach the conclusion of the three proposed export transmission routes. 4.2 BACKGROUND 4.2.1 Transmission Historical Development The existing transmission grid in the state of Nevada has generally been planned, designed, constructed, and operated to transport energy from generators located in neighboring states and generators located in rural locations to serve electric loads principally in urban centers within the state. Historically generators were sized to serve the electric loads for single concentrated urban areas and/or industrial electric customers. It was recognized over time that economies could be obtained by constructing large generation facilities. This required constructing transmission lines for interconnecting the generators with multiple concentrated electric loads (“load centers”). Further development of the transmission grid resulted from interconnecting multiple generation facilities to enhance reliability in the event of outages on the generators. The state of Nevada does not have indigenous coal, oil, or natural gas to fuel conventional generators. As a result, Nevada must rely on the import of fuels and electrical energy to supply the electric load centers throughout the State. To support this, the existing transmission grid has been constructed to a large extent to import electric energy resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrated Photovoltaic
    Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV) - Global Installation Size, Cost Analysis, Efficiencies and Competitive Analysis to 2020 Reference Code: GDAE1043MAR Publication Date: April 2011 The US, Germany and Japan are Key Countries for the CPV–The Emerging Solar Technology Industry CPV is an upcoming renewable market which promises to In 2010 Spain dominated the global CPV market with around provide cost-effective power generation at high levels of XX MW of cumulative installed capacity. Spain accounts for efficiency. Presently, the global CPV cumulative installed XX% of the global CPV installed base. Most parts of the country capacity is XX MW. The technology is still developing and so experience high DNI which attracts CPV installers for most CPV projects are in the pilot or prototype stage. Guascor investments in Spain. The US follows Spain with a cumulative Foton’s Navarre power plant and Murcia power plant are the installed capacity of around XX MW; thereby accounting for largest CPV plants with installed capacities of XX MW and XX XX% of the global CPV installed capacity. Greece and Australia MW respectively. Globally, Spain has the largest market for have also attracted CPV system installers due to a high DNI CPV installations. In the US, the major emerging companies are concentration. These countries account for approximately XX% SolFocus, Amonix, EMCORE and Skyline Solar. European and XX% of the global CPV cumulative installed capacity companies such as Concentrix, Abengoa Solar and ArimaEco respectively. have also started making progress in the CPV market. Global Cumulative Installations to Reach XX GW by 2020 Concentrated PV Market, Global, Cumulative Installed Capacity by Country, %, 2010 The CPV market is expected to grow dramatically over the next three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Permitted/Approved Renewable Energy Facilities NORTHERN NEVADA SOUTHERN NEVADA 1150 E
    Permitted/Approved Renewable Energy Facilities NORTHERN NEVADA SOUTHERN NEVADA 1150 E. William Street 9075 W. Diablo Dr., Ste. 250 Carson City, NV 89701 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (775) 684-6101 Phone: (702) 486-7210 Fax: (775) 684-6110 Fax: (702) 486-7206 Consumer Complaints: (775) 684-6100 Consumer Complaints: (702) 486-2600 Pursuant to Nevada Revised Statute 704.865, the PUCN approves Utility Environmental Protection Act (UEPA) permits for all privately- owned conventional (natural gas, oil, coal, nuclear) utility facilities constructed in Nevada. The PUCN also approves the construction of renewable energy projects with an output greater than 70 megawatts, and transmission for renewable energy greater than 200 kilovolts. Additionally, the PUCN approves purchase power agreements (PPAs) between NV Energy and conventional utility and renewable energy facilities. See the table below for a comprehensive list of renewable energy projects in Nevada with a PUCN- approved UEPA permit and/or PPA. Projects Within Nevada that Received PUCN PUCN Approval Project Details Approval MW Exporting/Internal Project UEPA¹ PPA² COD³ Notes⁶ Nameplate⁴ Generation⁵ Biogas 1 Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility X 2005 0.80 Internal 2004 Geothermal 2 Beowawe X 2006 17.70 Internal 05-5010 3 Buffalo/Jersey Valley X N/A 24.00 N/A 06-10021 4 Brady X 1992 24.00 Internal 1990 5 Carson Lake X N/A 31.50 N/A 06-10021 6 Carson Lake Basin Project X N/A 62.00 N/A 07-07013 7 Clayton Valley 1 X N/A 53.50 N/A 10-03022 8 Coyote Canyon X N/A 70.00 Exporting 11-06014 9
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder Solar Power JUN 3 2016 MBR App.Pdf
    20160603-5296 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 6/3/2016 12:51:20 PM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Boulder Solar Power, LLC ) Docket No. ER16-_____-000 APPLICATION FOR MARKET-BASED RATE AUTHORIZATION, REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF CATEGORY 1 SELLER STATUS, REQUEST FOR WAIVERS AND BLANKET AUTHORIZATIONS, AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PRIOR NOTICE REQUIREMENT Pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”),1 Section 35.12 of the regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”),2 Rules 204 and 205 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure,3 and FERC Order Nos. 697, et al.4 and Order No. 816,5 Boulder Solar Power, LLC (“Applicant”) hereby requests that the Commission: (1) accept Applicant’s proposed baseline market-based rate tariff (“MBR Tariff”) for filing; (2) authorize Applicant to sell electric energy, capacity, and certain ancillary services at market-based rates; (3) designate Applicant as a Category 1 Seller in all regions; and (4) grant Applicant such waivers and blanket authorizations as the Commission has granted to other sellers with market-based rate authorization. Applicant requests that the Commission waive its 60-day prior notice requirement6 to allow Applicant’s MBR Tariff to become effective as of July 1, 2016. In support of this Application, Applicant states as follows: 1 16 U.S.C. § 824d (2012). 2 18 C.F.R. § 35.12 (2016). 3 Id. §§ 385.204 and 385.205. 4 Mkt.-Based Rates for Wholesale Sales of Elec. Energy, Capacity & Ancillary Servs. by Pub. Utils., Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Guide to Surfing CONTENTS
    Sustainable Guide To Surfing CONTENTS 1 IntroductIon 03 1.1 What is sustainability? 08 1.2 What is wrong with the planet 08 1.3 How will it affect us as surfers? 12 1.4 Measuring our effect on the planet 17 2 EnErGY 19 2.1 Where does it come from and where does it go? 20 2.2 Energy: what to do? 24 3 TRAVEL 29 3.1 driving 30 3.2 Flying 33 3.3 Travelling: what to do 35 4 STUFF 44 4.1 the life cycle of stuff 45 4.2 Surfwear, marketing and the media 52 4.3 Surfboards 54 4.4 Wetsuits 57 4.5 other surfing gear 59 4.6 Stuff: what to do 61 5 concLusion 69 6 Further ReadInG (And viewinG) 71 7 ReferEnces 72 Thanks to: 1 INTRODUCTION the following two alternatives were written in 1972, in a u.K. magazine called Surf Insight. It’s a beautiful day – the sun clear and strong – sky absolute blue and the air fresh on your nostrils. You wake to a bowl of fresh fruit and two huge farm 1 eggs, grab your board and walk through green, dewy fields to your favourite surf spot. Not another being in sight except for the animals and birds going about their morning’s business. The beach is pure and inviting – you dig your toes into golden sand… It’s a beautiful day? – the sun weak – half obliterated by a perfect morning smog, the sky greyish-blue and the air smarting in your nostrils and choking your lungs… You gasp for another deep breath of sweet industrial smog – a yummy bowl of plastic Krunchy Pops with pasteurized milk and two battery- hen eggs you can hardly taste gobbled down with relish before the long walk through a concrete jungle to your favourite surf spot.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended and Restated Victorville-Lugo Interconnection Agreement
    DWP No. 10343 AMENDED AND RESTATED VICTORVILLE-LUGO INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY -l- Table of Contents SECTION TITLE PAGE 1. Parties 4 2. Recitals ,4 3. Agreement, .5 4. Effective Date Filing and Term 5 5. Definitions .6 6. Ownership of the Victorville-Lugo Transmission Lines .9 I 7. Victorville-Lugo Transmission Line .9 i 8. LADWP Facilities ,9 9. SCE Facilities 9 10. Operation and Maintenance of Transmission System 10 11. Transmission System, 11 12. Balancing Authority 12 13. Metering and Line Losses ,12 14. Scheduling of Power Deliveries 12 15. Adverse Determination or Expansion of Obligations 12 16. Successors and Assigns 13 17. Dispute Resolution ...14 18. Liability 14 29. Willful Action 15 20. No Dedication of Facilities 16 21. No Obligation to Offer Same Service to others 16 22. No Precedent. 16 -2- 23. Notices 16 24. Severability 17 25. Right of the Parties upon Termination 17 26. Force Majeure 17 27. Waivers and Remedies 18 28. Authorizations and Approvals 18 29. Relationship of Parties 18 30. No Third Party Rights or Obligation 18 31. Warranty of Authority 18 s \ 32. Assignment of Agreement 19 33. Conflicting Provisions 19 34. Governing Law 19 35. Signature Clause .20 Exhibit A Transmission Lines & Transmission System. ,21 Exhibit B Diagram. .26 “3- AMENDED AND RESTATED VICTORVILLE-LUGO INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT 1. Parties: The parties to this Victorville-Lugo Interconnection Agreement are the DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (“LADWP”), a department organized and existing under the Charter of the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation of the State of California, and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (“SCE”), a California corporation, hereinafter referred to individually as "Party" and collectively as "Parties".
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Power and Interconnection: the Economics of Getting to Market David Hurlbut
    Geothermal Power and Interconnection: The Economics of Getting to Market David Hurlbut NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-54192 April 2012 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Geothermal Power and Interconnection: The Economics of Getting to Market David Hurlbut Prepared under Task No. WE11.0815 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-6A20-54192 Golden, Colorado 80401 April 2012 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Infrastructure Update for December 2016
    Office of Energy Projects Energy Infrastructure Update For December 2016 Natural Gas Highlights • Natural received authorization to place into service its 2012 Storage Optimization Project which will provide 100 MMcf/d of capacity on its Gulf Coast Mainline from the Loudon Storage Field located near St. Emo in Fayette County, IL to a point of termination at Natural’s Compressor Station No. 113 near Joliet in Will County, IL. • Algonquin received authorization to place into service the Stony Point to Yorktown Take-up and Relay facilities as part of its Algonquin Incremental Market Project. These facilities will provide the remaining 97 MMcf/d of capacity out of the authorized 342 MMcf/d of capacity. • UGI Sunbury received authorization to place into service its Sunbury Pipeline Project which will provide 200 MMcf/d of capacity to serve markets in central PA, including a proposed electric generation facility in Snyder County, PA. • Tennessee received authorization to construct and operate its Southwest Louisiana Supply Project which will provide 295 MMcf/d of capacity on its existing 800 Line System in LA to serve the Cameron LNG export facility in Cameron Parish, LA. • Texas Eastern received authorization to construct and operate three projects, the Access South, the Adair Southwest, and the Lebanon Extension Projects, which will provide a total of 622 MMcf/d of capacity on its mainline from a receipt point in Uniontown, PA to Midwest and Southeastern markets. • Tennessee received authorization to construct and operate its Triad Expansion Project which will provide 180 MMcf/d of west-to-east capacity on its existing Line 300 system to serve a proposed electric generating plant in Lackawanna County, PA.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.0 Cumulative Impacts
    TransWest Express EIS Chapter 5.0 – Cumulative Impacts 5-1 5.0 Cumulative Impacts NEPA requires an assessment of potential cumulative impacts. Federal regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) define cumulative impacts as: “…the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time.” The same resources evaluated for Project effects (Chapter 3.0) are evaluated for cumulative effects. The cumulative impact discussion assumes that all environmental mitigation measures discussed in Chapter 3.0 would be applied to the Project and that similar measures would be applied to other reasonably foreseeable transmission lines proposed on federal lands in the same alternative corridors. It also is assumed that these and any other projects on federal lands would comply with the applicable BLM Land Use Plans and Forest Service Forest Plans, as well as applicable federal, state, and local regulations and permit requirements. The structure and content of the cumulative impacts analysis in this EIS follows the guidance contained in the BLM NEPA handbook (BLM 2008) and the CEQ Guidance on Considering Cumulative Effects Under the National Policy Act (CEQ 1997). 5.1 Physical and Temporal Boundaries of Cumulative Impacts In general, physical boundaries for cumulative impacts analysis varied by resource and were identical to those analysis areas used in Chapter 3.0 to determine the context of Project impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Plan
    2017-2018 TRANSMISSION PLAN March 14, 2018 REVISED DRAFT Foreword to Revised Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 1, 2018. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes, with particular emphasis on a number of projects where the recommendations have progressed since the release on February 1 and the subsequent stakeholder meeting on February 8: • The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. • The Oakland Clean Energy Initiative project is recommended for approval • The Phasor Measurement Unit project has been added and is recommended for approval • The Bridgerville-Garberville #2 115 kV line project is recommended to remain on hold. • The Kearney-Caruthers 70 kV Line Reonductor project is recommended to proceed with the original scope. • The recommended revised scope for the Kern 115 kV Area Reinfoement has been updated as presented at the February 8 stakeholder meeting. • Section 2.10 addressing the need for phasor measurement units to be installed on all ISO balancing authority area interties has been added. • Several projects approved in the 2016-2017 transmission planning cycle have been added to Table 7.1-1: Status of Previously-approved Projects Costing Less than $50M, that had been omitted from the table in the Draft 2017-2018 Transmission Plan. • The in-service date for a number of previously approved projects have been updated. A number of clarifications and edits have also been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft 2014-2015 Transmission Plan This Revised Draft Transmission Plan Reflects a Number of Changes from the Draft Plan Released on February 2, 2015
    Forward to the Revised Draft 2014-2015 Transmission Plan This revised draft transmission plan reflects a number of changes from the draft plan released on February 2, 2015. To assist our stakeholders following the transmission plan cycle, we have summarized a number of those changes: The model estimating the impact of the transmission plan on the ISO’s High Voltage TAC has been updated and the results added to the model. The ISO has confirmed with Duke American Transmission Company that DATC’s request window submission for the San Luis Transmission Project was sent, but not received on the original request window submission timeline. It has subsequently been resent and received by the ISO. Accordingly, the plan has been revised to incorporate the review of the to the request window submission. A number of clarifications and edits have been added throughout the plan to address other stakeholder comments. 2014-2015 ISO Transmission Plan March 19, 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 The Transmission Planning Process ................................................................ 3 Collaborative Planning Efforts .......................................................................... 4 Advancing Preferred Resources ....................................................................... 6 Reliability Assessment
    [Show full text]