Rebuttal! Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Seeing For Yourself, Inside! ® UFOMAGAZINE $5.99 US $7.99 CAN April /May 2005 68 April • May 2005 UFO Rebuttal! Vol. 20 No. 2 Catalog: 870 269-4177 COMING SOON To an eBook reader near you! Read the real story! Know the background! The exclusive, brand-new critical edition of the classic scary sci-fi story, the basis of all the movies and the cover story next issue! WAR OF THE WORLDS Included FREE with your order! But wait, there’s more! A FREE introductory subscription to UFO Magazine with your Filament eBook subscription, plus Don Ecker’s Past Sins! Limited time only! Get ready for the big movie event by learning the story behind the story. Order via mail, online, or by phone today! Name ................................................................................ Address .......................................................................................... City ............................................................ State ........ Zip ...................... Credit Card # ................................................... Exp Date ............. Security Code ........... Visa ❑ MC ❑ Amex ❑ Discover ❑ Mail to: Filament eBook Offer, PO Box 11013, Marina del Rey, CA 90295 (Sorry, only U.S. and Canadian orders can be accepted, due to Federal regulations.) UFO April • May 2005 1 UFO M A G A Z I N E Volume 20 • Number 2 contents 4 Publisher’s Note 5 Editor’s Note 8 Letters 29 Conferences Coming Up 75 Classifieds 76 Sightings by Date 78 Sightings Map columns 11 21st Century News 14 Coast to Coast AM 18 Exopolitics 20 On Assignment 24 Vaenian Abductions 27 News Guy 30 View From A Brit 80 I Get the Last Word 2 April • May 2005 UFO UFO M A G A Z I N E April • May 2005 features 32 The Big Rebuttal! Featuring those you know and trust—many of the same people you might have seen on the show, and some you never will. Read and decide for yourself. Stanton Friedman 34 John F. Schuessler 35 David M. Jacobs 36 Budd Hopkins 37 Steven M. Greer 38 Kathy Vaquilar 39 Sean Casteel 40 Jim Marrs 41 Scott Smith 42 Bill Hamilton 43 44 Alfred Webre and the Politics of Exopolitics Another incontrovertible revelation that shows how far the cover-up goes. by William J. Birnes 49 The Alien Autopsy Saga, Part II In which the players start to reveal their hands … by Don Ecker 44 The Brazilian Air Force Finally Admits … From our friends from Brazil’s premier UFO Magazine. Top-level; Part I. by Carlos Mendes 49 A Glimpse Through Raechel’s Eyes Meanwhile, while governments bicker, real people pick up the pieces. by Sean Casteel UFO April • May 2005 3 From the Publisher I have listened to more than a few opinions from our fort, so the show would seem to be balanced. In that re- subscribers about February’s ABC News UFO special. gard they showed the flag, presenting people whom they Opinions range from those who called it a disinformation qualified as experts to debunk such things as the reality of special to those, wise in the ways of television program- alien abductions and occasional UFO sightings. However, ming, who say it was the best the UFO community could this was where the inadequacy of their research showed have expected. The latter group’s point is well taken. Of through. Both the characterization of Stanton Friedman course we inside the community can point to all the as- as a “promoter” and the dismissal of alien abductions as pects of UFO evidence that the Jennings special missed. some form of sleep paralysis were cheap shots taken to I could argue, for example, that the dramatic video of buy the label of balanced. ABC News is better than that. Roger Leir extracting what he has referred to in his book as At the end of the day, all my qualifiers and criticisms metallic alien implants from his abductee patients—vid- notwithstanding, the Peter Jennings UFO special put real eo that highlighted the Whitley Strieber NBC special on UFO witnesses and real cases before a network primetime UFOs a couple of years ago—should have been included audience. And what do you think happened? From the as medical evidence of a UFO phenomenon. I could argue opinions I could garner from subscriber phone calls and that the researchers failed miserably in their coverage of from friends about average television viewers who don’t alien abductions, not just by minimizing Budd Hopkins’ know from a Stan Friedman, or a Budd Hopkins, or even a work, but by overlooking what I take to be the single most Karl Pflock, the viewer who saw that first hour of the spe- important abduction case in American ufology, the Betty cial put more stock in the testimony of witness and airline and Barney Hill case. pilots than in the opinions of experts. Nevertheless, people who say this special was good for After all, the people from Phoenix who described the ufology suggest that we look at the constraints that bind lights hovering over their roofs and balconies had more any UFO segment producers. Remember, we’re looking credibility as observers in the eyes of the average televi- at only 2 hours of air time. With the requisite minutes sion viewer than the experts whom nobody knew. So let’s for commercials taken out and network and local station give ABC credit for what they did accomplish before com- business, that leaves 100 minutes of actual programming. plaining about their omissions. Then subtract the introductions, wrap-up, and the Peter My own complaints are about the big omissions that Jennings commentary throughout and you have maybe 95 anyone claiming to have researched the real subject of minutes left. Given the general format of the show, pro- UFOs, or UFOs in America, would have to include in or- ducers would have to squeeze any number of compelling der to be fair. The second biggest omission in this category and worthwhile witness interviews for the first 48 or so is the Betty and Barney Hill case. minutes and then save the key experts for the second half The Hills, and there is no need to rehash the story here, of the program. Plus, the experts have to be mixed and were thrust into the national news magazines and papers balanced throughout. back in the early 1960s when their story of abduction The Jennings special, a news special, wasn’t out to make along a lonely New England country road at night was the case that UFOs are real. It might suggest such, but it made public by someone who heard it. The Hills were wasn’t an advocacy program. It was a program out to make not out for any publicity. Nor were they seeking to exploit a different case: That there is an observable phenomenon their story in any way. over which reasonable people can disagree and witnesses In fact, their psychiatrist, Dr. Benjamin Simon, was can be confused. And in this, it succeeded. so perplexed at the stories of their being taken aboard a The first hour did its job. The footage and witnesses spacecraft that the Hills separately told under hypnotic were compelling. However, because many of us in the regression, that he kept the truth from them during their UFO community had heard many of these stories before sessions by suggesting that they not remember what they and seen countless hours of the Phoenix Lights, for the told him. This is a major case in ufology, often attacked seasoned UFO buff there was nothing really new. It was, but never debunked. as some of our authors have said, same old, same old. But It would have been really instructive to have given that if the material looked like reruns to us, to 95 percent of case, well documented with lots of video, a mere 3 min- the viewing audience who knew very little about UFOs, it utes, leaving it with one question for viewers to answer: was new and exciting. In fact, what an overwhelming ma- Why was it that Betty Hill was able to construct a star jority of the audience saw was startling footage of strange map, based on information she said her extraterrestrial lights that none of the debunkers could explain away. abductors gave her, of a constellation that would not be But what the special put on the table in that first hour, discovered by astronomers for another six years? it had to try to take away. At least it had to make the ef- continued on next page 4 April • May 2005 UFO From the Editor Terri Schiavo will be dead by the time you read this. What will still be alive and staring America in the face are the devastatingly important issues that poor woman’s life and death have thrust into a blinding spotlight. At the primal level: Just what is the nature of consciousness? At the more political, arguably mundane level: Should governments, politicians and the judiciary interject themselves in private matters of life and death? Television’s talking heads will taste, chew up, swallow, and regurgitate these issues endlessly until another shocking human-interest newsmaker strikes a sensitive nerve in the public mind. By contrast, UFOs as TV fodder will rise up and submerge in sync with seasonal sweeps, perhaps, or more likely be forgotten altogether.