DOCSLIB.ORG

Nicolas Gisin SRA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nicolas Gisin SRA Quantum Technologies, Quo Vadis ? Nicolas Gisin GAP-Quantique, University of Geneva From the HLSC Report to the SRA Soft Geneva Geneva University underbelly spot Quantique GAP GAP 1 NG et al., IEEE J. Lightwave Polarization Mode Dispersion Technology, 9, 821-827, 1991. * P.M coupling 1 1’ 2’ 2 2’ 2 * 4 Geneva Geneva University 4’ 3’ Quantique GAP GAP A single mode fiber behaves like a many mode fiber. Many path interferences High coherence Laser Swisscom SOS: Sometimes we observe anomalously large PMD, larger than the «sum» of the components! How can that be? We checked everything Polarimeter very carefully. Geneva Geneva University Quantique Interference between paths in the test fiber GAP GAP Sensitive to environment artifacts 3 Anomalous PMD Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP B. Huttner, Ch. Geiser and N. Gisin, Optics Commun. 142, 119, 1997; IEEE J. Quant. Elect., 2000 4 From optical technology to subtle quantum measurement effect Slow and fast light in an optical fiber PRL 93, 203902, 2004 Geneva Geneva University Experimental results • Group velocity increases Quantique GAP GAP • Signal velocity remains constant 5 Weak Quantum Measurements Central theme of quantum technologies Consider a simple textbook detector model: A classical pointer on a scale is shifted by the value corresponding to the number | S of photons in the state. B σ If the initial position of the pointer is δ-peaked, it corresponds to a projective photon number measurement Geneva Geneva University But when the pointer has a non-zero spread σ the detector only gives a Partial information on the number of photons in the system (weak measurement) Quantique GAP GAP + post-selection weak values 6 Quantum Nonlocality and Entanglement Aspect et al. 1997 1981 Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP Entanglement is nonlocal randomness: 7 one random event that manifests itself at several locations. GAP Quantique Geneva University A loophole Ronald Hanson’s group Ronald Hanson’s - free Bell test in in testBell free Delft Applied Physics: From Bell tests to Quantum cryptography 100% correlation perfect key No cloning secret key Alice Bob * Geneva Geneva University W. Tittel et al., PRL 81, 3563-3566, 1998 Quantique GAP GAP 9 Quantum cryptography below lake Geneva Alice Bob A t t . PBS * F.M. Geneva Geneva University Nature 378, 449, 1995. Applied Phys. Lett. 70, 793-795, 1997. Quantique Electron. Letters 33, 586-588, 1997; 34, 2116-2117, 1998. GAP GAP J. Modern optics 48, 2009-2021, 2001. 10 New simple and efficient QKD protocol Geneva Geneva University Superconducting 2.5 GHz Ultralow-loss detectors repetition rate fibers developed in transmitter Geneva Quantique GAP GAP Secret key rate vs distance x X Toshiba 2018 and 2017 GVA 2019 2Mbit/s 60 km best CV result: Huang et. al. 2016 x Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP Device-Independent Q info Processing Alice Bob x=0 or 1 y=0 or 1 0 1 0 1 If p(a,b|x,y) violates some Bell inequality, then p(a,b|x,y) contains secrecy a b irrespective of any detail of the Geneva Geneva University implementation ! untrusted untrusted After publicly announcing a fair sample of their data, Quantique Alice and Bob’s information is entirely contained in the conditional probability GAP GAP p(a,b|x,y) 13 GAP Quantique Geneva University Q computing Q computing & supremacy 14 GAP Quantique Geneva University Continuous weak measurement Continuous 15 Quantum Repeaters Bridging long distances Geneva Geneva University Multimode QMs to solve the Rate Problem Single-mode storage: rate limited by L0/c N-mode storage: rate limited by NL /c Quantique 0 GAP GAP Multimode QMs required for practical repeaters Quantum memory Goal: controlled and reversible mapping of a photonic quantum state onto a long lived atomic ensemble. crystal doped with billions of ions photon out at desired photon in time in same Q state The quantum state of the photon Geneva Geneva University is now coded in a huge entangled states of billions of « atoms » Quantique GAP GAP 17 Multimode Storage using Ensemble-based QMs Ensembles can store light using different degrees of freedom Time multiplexing in rare-earth-ion doped crystals with the Atomic Frequency Comb (AFC) memory Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP Multimode spin-photon correlations – 1 ms storage Second-order cross-correlation function Geneva Geneva University Quantique The Stokes/anti-Stokes pairs have a coherence time of 410 ns. GAP GAP About 12 temporal modes per 10 microseconds detection gates. C. Laplane, P. Jobez, J. Etesse, N. Gisin, and M. Afzelius, PRL 118, 210501 (2017) Towards long duration storage (>1 seconds) 151 3+ in Eu :Y2SiO5 Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP Novel material based on the hybridization of electronic-nuclear states Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP A. Tiranov, A. Ortu, S. Welinski, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, N. Gisin, M. Afzelius Nature Materials 17, 671 (2018) GAP Quantique Geneva University 22 Quantum Networks with independent sources and joined Q measurements Certify quantumness of networks Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP 23 NG, Entropy, «25 years of Q teleportation», 21,325 (2019) The Triangle with binary outcomes a =±1 A 6 qubit toy universe, without How to formalize and input. How to prove exploit the NSI principle? Alice quantumness? How to One has only access to prove that the outcomes P(a,b,c). contain some randomness? Bob Charlie b=±1 c =±1 Geneva Geneva University There are no inputs. However, Alice can decide not to perform any measurement, or to change the local topology, that should not affect the B-C correlation: no-signaling. Quantique GAP GAP 24 The Triangle with binary outcomes a =±1 d=±1 Alice Dave Bob Charlie b=±1 c =±1 Geneva Geneva University There are no inputs. However, Alice can decide not to perform any measurement, or to change the local topology, that should not affect the B-C correlation: no-signaling. Quantique Alice and Charlie are independent. Similarly, GAP GAP Dave and Bob are independent. NSI 25 Machine Learning Neural networks “cat” a p(a|β γ) p(b|γ α) p(c|α β) Geneva Geneva University γ * β Quantique GAP GAP α b c γ α β 26 Quantum Networks arXiv:1901.08287 (Finner ineq.), PRL 123, 070403 (2019) arXiv:1906.06495 (Salman Triangle), PRL 123. 140401 (2019) arXiv:1905.04902 (NSI principle) arXiv:1907.10552 (Machine learning) Geneva Geneva University Quantique GAP GAP 27 From (pretty trivial) Physics to (serious) Technology Geneva Geneva University Quantique • A conceptually simple entropy source • Only quantum physics offers fundamental randomness GAP GAP • Easy to pindown the origine of the randomness • A practical random number generator GAP Quantique Geneva University 29 GAP Quantique Geneva University Launchof QRNG - chip QRNG-chip . Launch of Quantis QRNG chip Next Generation . Smallest QRNG . Standards compliant randomness (meet NIST 800-90A/B/C requirements) . Quantis 6M QRNG Chip certified for automotive (AEC-Q100) – 6Mbps raw data . Quantis 20M QRNG chip for higher throughput - 20Mbps raw data . New Quantis Appliance designed for high availability data centers . Standards compliant randomness (NIST 800-90A/B/C compliant) in FIPS 140-2 compliant hardware . High availaiblity with redundant power & fans . Quantis QA2 with 16Mbps and 60Mbps Geneva Geneva University . Provides randomness as a service for multiple remote applications . Next Generation Quantis PCIe card Quantique . Smaller form factor with higher throughput (10Mbps and 60Mbps) GAP GAP . Standards compliant randomness (NIST 800-90A/B/C compliant) 3 ment strat egies, occurring with probabilities p(x) and a pseudo randomness generat or). The second assump- p(λ) respectively, is then given by tions concerns the overlap of the two prepared stat es. X X We assume that , in each round of the prot ocol, the two λ λ pg = p(x) p(λ) max{ Tr[⇢x ⇧ ø], 1− Tr[⇢x ⇧ ø ]} , (1) prepared stat es cannot be perfectly distinguished (using x λ any possible quantum measurement procedure). If the two stat es are pure, it is possible to discriminat e them λ where ⇢x = | x i h x |, and ⇧ b are the elements of a without any error, at the price of having a minimal rat e three-outcome positive-operat or-value measure (POVM) of inconclusive rounds, given by the overlap between the describing the measurement. To certify randomness, we two stat es. Note that if the stat es are mixed, with over- need to upper bound pg over all possible measurement lapping support, then they cannot be distinguished un- strat egies which are consistent with the observed exper- ambiguously anymore. We assume that the two prepared imental dat a. Because the trace is invariant under uni- stat es, ⇢0 and ⇢1 fulfill F (⇢0, ⇢1) > δ,where F is the fi- tary transformat ions, only the overlap of the input stat es delity. This condition must hold with respect to any ob- mat ter, and not the stat es themselves. As we explain in server, in particular from the point of view of the measur- App. A, upper bounds on pg can be established by means ing device. No additional informat ion is available which of semidefinite programming (SDP). Specifically, allows picking out specific terms in any decomposition of X the stat es. This ensures that ⇢0 and ⇢1 have a minimal ⇤ indistinguishability from the point of view of the measur- pg 6 pg = ⌫bx p(b|x) (2) b,x ing device. Since, without additional informat ion, going from pure to mixed stat es with the same fidelity cannot for any numbers ⌫bx which fulfil that there exists four help in distinguishing the stat es, taking ⇢0 and ⇢1 pure is λ 0 ,λ 1 2 ⇥2 hermitian mat rices H ,with λ0, λ1 =0, 1such the most conservat ive choice when bounding theguessing that probability, and hence our bound above is general under this assumption.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Chance Nicolas Gisin
    Quantum Chance Nicolas Gisin Quantum Chance Nonlocality, Teleportation and Other Quantum Marvels Nicolas Gisin Department of Physics University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland ISBN 978-3-319-05472-8 ISBN 978-3-319-05473-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05473-5 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014944813 Translated by Stephen Lyle L’impensable Hasard. Non-localité, téléportation et autres merveilles quantiques Original French edition published by © ODILE JACOB, Paris, 2012 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Languages Shape Our Understanding of Time in Physics Physics Is Formulated in Terms of Timeless, Axiomatic Mathematics
    comment Corrected: Publisher Correction Mathematical languages shape our understanding of time in physics Physics is formulated in terms of timeless, axiomatic mathematics. A formulation on the basis of intuitionist mathematics, built on time-evolving processes, would ofer a perspective that is closer to our experience of physical reality. Nicolas Gisin n 1922 Albert Einstein, the physicist, met in Paris Henri Bergson, the philosopher. IThe two giants debated publicly about time and Einstein concluded with his famous statement: “There is no such thing as the time of the philosopher”. Around the same time, and equally dramatically, mathematicians were debating how to describe the continuum (Fig. 1). The famous German mathematician David Hilbert was promoting formalized mathematics, in which every real number with its infinite series of digits is a completed individual object. On the other side the Dutch mathematician, Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer, was defending the view that each point on the line should be represented as a never-ending process that develops in time, a view known as intuitionistic mathematics (Box 1). Although Brouwer was backed-up by a few well-known figures, like Hermann Weyl 1 and Kurt Gödel2, Hilbert and his supporters clearly won that second debate. Hence, time was expulsed from mathematics and mathematical objects Fig. 1 | Debating mathematicians. David Hilbert (left), supporter of axiomatic mathematics. L. E. J. came to be seen as existing in some Brouwer (right), proposer of intuitionist mathematics. Credit: Left: INTERFOTO / Alamy Stock Photo; idealized Platonistic world. right: reprinted with permission from ref. 18, Springer These two debates had a huge impact on physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of Locality and Free Choice Are Equivalent Resources in Bell Experiments
    For published version see PNAS 118 (17) e2020569118 (2021) Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments Pawel Blasiaka,b,1, Emmanuel M. Pothosb, James M. Yearsleyb, Christoph Gallusc, and Ewa Borsuka aInstitute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland; bCity, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom; cTechnische Hochschule Mittelhessen, D-35390 Gießen, Germany Bell inequalities rest on three fundamental assumptions: realism, lo- Surprisingly, nature violates Bell inequalities (8–15) which cality, and free choice, which lead to nontrivial constraints on cor- means that if the standard causal (or realist) picture is to be relations in very simple experiments. If we retain realism, then vio- maintained at least one of the remaining two assumptions, that lation of the inequalities implies that at least one of the remaining is locality or free choice, has to fail. It turns out that rejecting two assumptions must fail, which can have profound consequences just one of those two assumptions is always enough to explain for the causal explanation of the experiment. We investigate the ex- the observed correlations, while maintaining consistency with tent to which a given assumption needs to be relaxed for the other the causal structure imposed by the other. Either option poses to hold at all costs, based on the observation that a violation need a challenge to deep-rooted intuitions about reality, with a not occur on every experimental trial, even when describing corre- full range of viable positions open to serious philosophical lations violating Bell inequalities. How often this needs to be the dispute (16–18).
    [Show full text]
  • Quant-Ph/0512168V1 20 Dec 2005 Uly M Fcus,Ntwiigfrenti,Btfor Ac- Sub- the Well, but Somewhat of Einstein, (Necessarily [2])
    Can relativity be considered complete ? From Newtonian nonlocality to quantum nonlocality and beyond Nicolas Gisin Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland (Dated: October 31, 2018) We review the long history of nonlocality in physics with special emphasis on the conceptual breakthroughs over the last few years. For the first time it is possible to study ”nonlocality without signaling” from the outside, that is without all the quantum physics Hilbert space artillery. We emphasize that physics has always given a nonlocal description of Nature, except during a short 10 years gap. We note that the very concept of ”nonlocality without signaling” is totally foreign to the spirit of relativity, the only strictly local theory. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION in his rejection of nonlocality! However, most physicists didn’t pay much attention to this aspect of Newtonian 100 years after Einstein miraculous year and 70 years physics. By lack of alternative, physics remained nonlo- after the EPR paper [1], I like to think that Einstein cal until about 1915 when Einstein introduced the world would have appreciated the somewhat provocative title to General Relativity. But let’s start ten years earlier, in of this contribution. However, Einstein would probably 1905. not have liked its conclusion. But who can doubt that relativity is incomplete? and likewise that quantum me- chanics is incomplete! Indeed, these are two scientific III. EINSTEIN, THE GREATEST theories and Science is nowhere near its end (as a matter MECHANICAL ENGINEER of fact, I do believe that there is no end [2]). Well, ac- tually, I am, of course, not writing for Einstein, but for In 1905 Einstein introduced three radically new the- those readers interested in a (necessarily somewhat sub- ories or models in physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Cryptography: Where Do We Stand?
    Quantum Cryptography: where do we stand? Nicolas Gisin Group of Applied Physics University of Geneva - Switzerland In the last few years the world in which Quantum Cryptography evolves has deeply changed. On the one side the revelations of Snowden, though he said nothing really new, made the world more aware of the importance to protect sensitive data from all kinds of adversaries, including sometimes “friends”. On the other side, breakthroughs in quantum computation, in particular in superconducting qubits and surface-codes, made it possible that in 15 to 25 years there might be a quantum machine able to break today’s codes. This implies that in order to protect today’s data over a few decades, one has to act now and use some quantum-safe cryptography. Such a perspective is taken very seriously by the cryptography community who is looking for a quantum-safe alternative to today’s systems. Quantum-safe cryptography covers all cryptography systems that resist to quantum attacks. As in today’s cryptography, this covers both complexity-based protocols and provably secure systems. The first ones consists in merely replacing the problem on which RSA rests (i.e. factoring) by another problem claimed to be intractable both for classical and for quantum computers, as factoring was claimed to be intractable. This approach has the great advantage of being flexible, cost-effective and relatively similar to today’s approach, hence security experts don’t need to change much. But it has the great drawback that one is again betting on the unknown to secure our information-based society.
    [Show full text]
  • Prizes 2012 Editor’S Note Inside Ian T
    The Quantum Volume 7, Number 1 Times Second Half, 2012 Newsletter of the Topical Group s・p・e・c・i・a・l i・s・s・u・e on Quantum Information American Physical Society Prizes 2012 Editor’s Note Inside Ian T. Durham In what could be viewed as a watershed moment for p. 2 Nobel laureate profiles quantum information, foundations, and computation, this year’s Nobel Prize has been p. 5 FQXi large grant, “Physics of awarded to two of our field’s experimental pioneers: Serge Haroche of Collège de France and École Information” initial inquiry Normale Supérieure, both in Paris, and David (deadline January 16, 2013) Wineland of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado. In honor of both Serge and Dave, we have commissioned p. 6 FQXi honorees in quantum profiles on each from people who know them well, information both on a professional and a personal level. There were several other recent awards and recognitions given to members of the quantum p. 7 Letter from Incoming Chair information community including the addition of Daniel Lidar four APS fellows under the GQI banner and Rob Spekkens’ First Prize in the FQXi Essay Contest. We highlight those on subsequent pages and include p. 8 New APS GQI Fellows the latest FQXi Large Grant RFP which is specifically aimed at the physics of information. On a more practical note, this issue also p. 8 GQI Elections (deadline includes information on the current GQI election. January 17, 2013) Biographies and candidate statements for the Vice Chair and Member-at-Large positions begin on p.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Locality of Experimental Qutrit Pairs 2
    Non-Locality of Experimental Qutrit Pairs C Bernhard†, B Bessire†, A Montina∗, M Pfaffhauser∗, A Stefanov†, S Wolf∗ † Institute of Applied Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. ∗ Faculty of Informatics, USI Lugano, Switzerland. Abstract. The insight due to John Bell that the joint behavior of individually measured entangled quantum systems cannot be explained by shared information remains a mystery to this day. We describe an experiment, and its analysis, displaying non-locality of entangled qutrit pairs. The non-locality of such systems, as compared to qubit pairs, is of particular interest since it potentially opens the door for tests of bipartite non-local behavior independent of probabilistic Bell inequalities, but of deterministic nature. 1. Non-Locality in Theory ... The discovery of John Bell that nature was non-local and quantum physics cannot be embedded into a local realistic theory in which the outcomes of experiments are completely determined by values located where the experiment actually takes place, and no far-away variables, is profound. It probably poses more questions than it has solved: If shared classical information [4] as well as hidden communication [3] both fall short of explaining non-local correlations, what “mechanism” could possibly be behind this strange effect? What can we learn from Bell’s insight — and from the series of experiments carried out in the aftermath [18, 2, 28, 30] — about the nature of space and time? What can we conclude about free choices (randomness) and, more generally, the role of information in physics and in our understanding of natural laws? In fact, Bell’s theorem is an information-theoretic statement: It characterizes what kind of joint input-output behavior P (ab xy) | arXiv:1402.5026v1 [quant-ph] 20 Feb 2014 can in principle be explained by shared (classical) information R, i.e., is of the form r r PR(r)P (a x)P (b y) , r | | X and which cannot.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments with Entangled Photons
    Experiments with Entangled Photons Bell Inequalities, Non-local Games and Bound Entanglement Muhammad Sadiq Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Department of Physics Stockholm University Sweden. c Muhammad Sadiq, Stockholm 2016 c American Physical Society. (papers) c Macmillan Publishers Limited. (papers) ISBN 978-91-7649-358-8 Printed in Sweden by Holmbergs, Malmö 2016. Distributor: Department of Physics, Stockholm University. Abstract Quantum mechanics is undoubtedly a weird field of science, which violates many deep conceptual tenets of classical physics, requiring reconsideration of the concepts on which classical physics is based. For instance, it permits per- sistent correlations between classically separated systems, that are termed as entanglement. To circumvent these problems and explain entanglement, hid- den variables theories–based on undiscovered parameters–have been devised. However, John S. Bell and others invented inequalities that can distinguish be- tween the predictions of local hidden variable (LHV) theories and quantum mechanics. The CHSH-inequality (formulated by J. Clauser, M. Horne, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt), is one of the most famous among these inequalities. In the present work, we found that this inequality actually contains an even simpler logical structure, which can itself be described by an inequality and will be violated by quantum mechanics. We found 3 simpler inequalities and were able to violate them experimentally. Furthermore, the CHSH inequality can be used to devise games that can outperform classical strategies. We explore CHSH-games for biased and un- biased cases and present their experimental realizations. We also found a re- markable application of CHSH-games in real life, namely in the card game of duplicate Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Communication Jubilee of Teleportation
    Quantum Communication Quantum • Rotem Liss and Tal Mor Liss • Rotem and Tal Quantum Communication Celebrating the Silver Jubilee of Teleportation Edited by Rotem Liss and Tal Mor Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Entropy www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Quantum Communication—Celebrating the Silver Jubilee of Teleportation Quantum Communication—Celebrating the Silver Jubilee of Teleportation Editors Rotem Liss Tal Mor MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editors Rotem Liss Tal Mor Technion–Israel Institute of Technology Technion–Israel Institute of Technology Israel Israel Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy/special issues/Quantum Communication). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03943-026-0 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03943-027-7 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Editors .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Communication
    Quantum Communication: QKD, teleportation into a solid-state quantum memory and Large entanglement Nicolas Gisin, Hugo Zbinden, Mikael Afzelius, Rob Thew and Félix Bussières GAP-Optique, University of Geneva . Commercial QKD system . Why QKD ? . Longer distances: networks based on trusted nodes Geneva University . Q memories for quantum repeaters and networks . Large Entanglement GAP Quantique GAP 1 Years of continuous commercial operation 75 km Installed multiplexed quantum channel for commercial users. Geneva University GAP Quantique GAP Used daily by some commercial 2 t Why QKD ? How much of a problem for QKD is quantum Geneva University computing, really?? GAP Quantique GAP Courtesy of Prof. Michele Mosca3 How soon do we need to worry? Depends on: . How long do you need encryption to be secure? (x years) . How much time will it take to re-tool the existing infrastructure with large-scale quantum-safe solution? (y years) . How long will it take for a large-scale quantum computer to be built (or for any other relevant advance? (z years) Theorem 1: If x + y > z, then worry. Geneva University What do we do here?? y x z GAP Quantique GAP time Courtesy of Prof. Michele Mosca GAP Quantique Geneva University Courtesy of Prof. Michele Mosca Michele of Prof. Courtesy 5 How far can one send a photon ? Secret Rate Key P2P + WDM Rate 10MHz +4 Years 1MHz Today Lab Today Commercial 100kHz 10kHz 1kHz Geneva University 1Hz 100 200 300 400 Distance [km] There is a hard wall around 400 km ! With the best optical fibers, perfect noise-free detectors and ideal 10 GHz GAP Quantique GAP single-photon sources, it would take centuries to send 1 qubit over 1000 km ! 6 Long distance QKD: World records 150 km of installed fibers, Optics Express 17, 13326 (2009) Lausanne 250 km in the lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Oblivious Transfer and Quantum Channels
    Oblivious Transfer and Quantum Channels Nicolas Gisin∗ Sandu Popescu†‡ Valerio Scarani∗ Stefan Wolf§ J¨urg Wullschleger§ ∗Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, 10, rue de l’Ecole-de-M´edecine,´ CH-1211 Gen`eve 4, Switzerland. E-mail: Nicolas.Gisin,Valerio.Scarani @physics.unige.ch †H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory,{ University of Bristol, Tynd} all Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TL, U.K. ‡Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Stoke Gifford, Bristol BS12 6QZ, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] §Computer Science Department, ETH Z¨urich, ETH Zentrum, CH-8092 Z¨urich, Switzerland. E-mail: wolf,wjuerg @inf.ethz.ch { } Abstract— We show that oblivious transfer can be seen as the (see Figure 2). He showed that there exist certain inequalities classical analogue to a quantum channel in the same sense as (now called Bell inequalities) that cannot be violated by any non-local boxes are for maximally entangled qubits. local system, but which are violated when an EPR pair is measured. I. INTRODUCTION A. Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality U V One of the most interesting and surprising consequences of R R the laws of quantum physics is the phenomenon of entangle- X Y ment. In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen [6] initiated a discussion on non-local behavior. Let us consider, for instance, the following, maximally entangled state, called singlet or, Fig. 2. A local system. alternatively, EPR or Bell state: 1 The behavior of ψ− is, hence, non-local. It is important to ψ− = ( 01 10 ) . (1) | i | i √2 | i − | i note that non-local behavior, although explainable classically only by communication, does not allow for signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Entanglement 25 Years After Quantum Teleportation: Testing Joint Measurements in Quantum Networks
    entropy Article Entanglement 25 Years after Quantum Teleportation: Testing Joint Measurements in Quantum Networks Nicolas Gisin Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; [email protected] Received: 27 September 2018; Accepted: 20 March 2019; Published: 26 March 2019 Abstract: Twenty-five years after the invention of quantum teleportation, the concept of entanglement gained enormous popularity. This is especially nice to those who remember that entanglement was not even taught at universities until the 1990s. Today, entanglement is often presented as a resource, the resource of quantum information science and technology. However, entanglement is exploited twice in quantum teleportation. Firstly, entanglement is the “quantum teleportation channel”, i.e., entanglement between distant systems. Second, entanglement appears in the eigenvectors of the joint measurement that Alice, the sender, has to perform jointly on the quantum state to be teleported and her half of the “quantum teleportation channel”, i.e., entanglement enabling entirely new kinds of quantum measurements. I emphasize how poorly this second kind of entanglement is understood. In particular, I use quantum networks in which each party connected to several nodes performs a joint measurement to illustrate that the quantumness of such joint measurements remains elusive, escaping today’s available tools to detect and quantify it. Keywords: quantum teleportation; quantum measurements; nonlocality 1. Introduction In 1993 six co-authors surprised the world by proposing a method to teleport a quantum state from one location to a distant one [1,2]. Twenty five years later the surprise is gone, but the fascination remains; how can an object submitted to the no-cloning theorem disappear here and reappear there without anything carrying any information about it transmitted from the sender, Alice, to the receiver, Bob? Today, the answer seems well known and has a name: entanglement [3].
    [Show full text]