WIDER Working Paper 2016/19 The social shaping of nuclear energy technology in South Africa Britta Rennkamp1 and Radhika Bhuyan2 April 2016 In partnership with Abstract: This paper analyses the question why the South African government intends to procure nuclear energy technology, despite affordable and accessible fossil and renewable energy alternatives. We analyse the social shaping of nuclear energy technology based on the statements of political actors in the public media. We combine a discourse network analysis with qualitative analysis to establish the coalitions in support and opposition of the programme. The central arguments in the debate are cost, safety, job creation, the appropriateness of nuclear energy, emissions reductions, transparency, risks for corruption, and geopolitical influences. The analysis concludes that the nuclear programme is not primarily about generating electricity, as it creates tangible benefits for the coalition of supporters. Keywords: nuclear energy, energy policy, science and technology policy, discourse network analysis, South Africa JEL classification: O14, Q48, O33, O55 Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all colleagues, unknown reviewers, and interviewees who supported our work on this paper. Thanks to the interviewees for the trust of sharing your insights. Thanks to the reviewers and colleagues for the helpful comments on previous versions of this paper and constructive comments during two seminars at the Universities of the Witwatersrand and Cape Town. Thanks to UNU-WIDER and the Volkswagen Foundation, Compagnia di San Paolo, as well as Riksbankens Jubileumsfond under the project, ‘Climate Change Mitigation and Poverty Reduction’ for support. 1 Energy Research Centre and African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, South Africa, corresponding author:
[email protected]; 2 Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection, Johannesburg, South Africa.