DOCSLIB.ORG

Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 1994 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College Carol R. Goldman Trina R. Knight Johanna V. Thomas How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/23 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature A Bibliography John A. Drobnicki, Carol R. Goldman, Trina R. Knight, and Johanna V. Thomas Holocaust-denial is a body of work that seeks to prove that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although not all of the deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revisionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, make the same claims, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate European Jewry. Those who deny the Holocaust believe that the Jews themselves, usually referred to as “Zionists,” fabricated the “Big Lie” in order to gain sympathy for a homeland and to extort money, in the form of repara- tions payments, from Germany. The Nazis themselves can be thought of as the first Holocaust revisionists, for they tried to conceal their extermination program behind euphemisms such as “special treatment” and “final solution to the Jewish problem.” Present-day revisionists all share deep-seated anti- Semitic feelings, a hatred of Israel, and a need to rehabilitate and glorify Germany, fascism, and the Third Reich. This bibliography includes both works abot/f Holocaust revisionism and works of Holocaust revisionism. Although those who deny the Holocaust write in many languages and in many countries, the scope of this project has been limited to works in English, except in the case of Robert Faurisson, because of his notoriety, and a French journal. While this bibliography has been divided into many subject areas, it is acknowledged that many of the entries cross sev- eral categories, especially the works in the “general overview” section. This bibliography grew out of the authors’ Master of Library Science research project at the Queens College Graduate School of Library and Information Studies, a study of Holocaust- denial literature in public libraries, under the direction of Dr. Marianne Cooper. GENERAL OVERVIEW ---------- . Holocaust “Revisionism": Reinventing the Big Lie. ADL Research Report. New York: Anti-Defama- Aronsfeld, C. C. “Denials of the Holocaust: After the tion League of B’nai B’rith, 1989. Murders— The Lies.” Jewish Frontier46 (April 1979): Braham, Randolph L. “Historical Revisionism and the 24-27. New Right.” In Remembering for the Future: Working Bauer, Yehuda. “ ‘Revisionism’—^The Repudiation of Papers and Addenda. Ed. Yehuda Bauer et al. New the Holocaust and Its Historical Significance.” In The York: Pergamon Press, 1989, 2:2093-2103. Historiography of the Hoiocaust Period: Proceedings Caplan, Marc. Hitler’s Apologists: The Anti-Semitic of the Fifth Yad Vashem internationai Conference, Propaganda of Holocaust “Revisionism." New York: Jerusalem, March 1983. Ed. Yisrael Gutman and Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, 1993. Gideon Greif. Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1988, pp. Garb, Alison B., and Alan M. Schwartz. Holocaust “Re- 697-708. visionism": A Denial of History. An Update. ADL Bolton, Judith. “Holocaust Revisionism: Editing the Facts. New York: Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Past.” Congress Monthly 59 (July/August 1992): 9-12. B’rith, 1986. The authors would like to thank Phyllis Poses and Paul Tallarico, Information Services/Interloan Division, Queens Borough Public Library, for their assistance in obtaining materials essential for this bibliography. 17 Bulletin of Bibliography Vol. 51.N0.1 Dawidowicz, Lucy S. “Lies About the Holocaust.” Com- Pois, Robert A. “Ghosts Do Not Bleed: An Analysis of mentarylO (December 1980): 31-37. Holocaust Revisionism.” Jewish Frontier 56 (Sep- Eatwell, Roger. “The Holocaust Denial: A Study in tember-October 1989): 17-23, 34. Propaganda Technique.” In Neo-Fascism in Europe. Reich, Walter. “Denying the Holocaust: Prelude to Ed. Luciano Cheles, Ronnie Ferguson, and What?” Washington Post, 3 May 1981, p. C3. Michalina Vaughan. New York: Longman, 1991, pp. ---------- . “Erasing the Holocaust: Two Historians Untan- 120-146. gle the Perverse Ingenuity That Says It Never Hap- Felberbaum, Jacob. “Revisionism Pains Spirit of Holo- pened.” New York Times Book Review, 11 July 1993, caust Survivors.” Martyrdom and Resistance 20 pp. 1,31,33-34. (September-October 1993): 5. Schwartz, Alan. Holocaust “Revisionism": A Denial of Foster, Arnold. T h e Ultimate Cruelty.” ADL Buiietin 16 History. ADL Facts. New York: Anti-Defamation (June 1959): 1 -2 ,7 -8 . League of B’nai B’rith, 1980. Gutman, Israel. T h e Denial of the Holocaust and Its Seidel, Gill. The Holocaust Denial: Antisemitism, Consequences.” In Remembering for the Future: Racism, and the New Right. Leeds: Beyond the Pale Working Papers and Addenda. Ed. Yehuda Bauer Collective, 1986. et al. New York: Pergamon Press, 1989, 2:2116- Siamo, Brian. “False History, Gas Chambers, Blue 2124. Smoke, and Cracked Mirrors.” The Humanist 53 ----------. Denying the Hoiocaust. Jerusalem: Shazar Li- (July-August 1993): 31-33. brary, Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Vidal Sas- Stern, Kenneth S. Holocaust Denial. New York: Ameri- soon International Center for the Study of can Jewish Committee, 1993. Antisemitism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. Assassins of Memory: Essays on 1985. the Denial of the Holocaust. Trans. Jeffrey Mehiman. ----------. “Holocaust, Denial of the.” In Encyciopedia of New York: Columbia University Press, 1992. the Hoiocaust. Ed. Israel Gutman. New York: Macmil- Wiesel, Elie. “What Really Happened to Six Million lan, 1990, 2:681-687. Jews.” Jewish Digest 23 (April 1978): 36-38. Haupt, Peter I. “A Universe of Lies: Holocaust Revi- Will, George. Trying to Deconstruct the Holocaust.” sionism and the Myth of a Jewish World-Conspiracy.” New York Newsday, 29 August 1993, p. 33. B.A. thesis, Williams College, 1987; shortened ver- sion in Patterns of Prejudice 25 (Summer 1991): 75-85. HOLOCAUST REVISIONISM “Holocaust ‘Revisionism’: Denial of History.” ADL Spe- ciai Edition (October 1990): n.p. IN AMERICA “Holocaust 'Revisionists’: They Keep Trying." ADL Bui- ietin 43 (March 1986): 3-4. Aronsfeld, C. C. “Hoax of the Century.” Patterns of Prej- John, Barbara J. “Holocaust Revisionism: An illustra- udice 10 (November-December 1976): 13-16; con- tion and Evaluation.” M.A. thesis. University of densed version in Jewish Digest 22 (June 1977): Wales, 1992. 23-28. Kakutani, Michiko. “When History Is a Casualty.” New ---------- . T h e Institute for Historical Review: ’Revision- York Times, 30 April 1993, pp. C l , C31. ists’ Who Whitewash Nazism.” IJA Research Re- Kopecky, Lilli. “Holocaust Denials, Neo-Nazism, Anti- ports, no. 4 (May 1982): 1-8. Semitism, Radicalism, and Terrorism.” In in the Beck, Melina, Jeff B. Copeland, and Zofia Smardz. Shadow of the Fiames: Six Lectures on the Holo- “Footnote to the Holocaust.” Newsweek 38 (19 Octo- caust, by Lilli Kopecky. Atlanta: Center for Research ber 1981): 73. in Social Change, Emory University, 1982, pp. Bishop, Katherine. “Ads on Holocaust ‘Hoax’ Stir De- 54-73. bate at Colleges.” New York Times, 23 December Levin, Nora. “Assaults on Holocaust History.” Mid- 1991, p. A12. stream 35 (April 1989): 17-21. “Bradley Smith: A Man and His Myth.” ADL Special Edi- Lipstadt, Deborah E. “Deniers, Relativists, and Pseudo- tion (February 1992): n.p. Scholarship.” Dimensions 6 (AprW 1991): 4-9. Branscum, Deborah. WWII: Just a Bad Dream.” Mother ----------. “Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault Jones 6 (July 1981): 7. on Truth.” Jewish Spectator 56 (Spring 1992): T h e Butz Hoax.” Patterns of Prejudice 11 (March-April 65-66. 1977): 12-13. ---------- . Denying the Hoiocaust: The Growing Assault Campbell, Unda P. “Liberty Lobby in the Spotlight with on Truth and Memory. New York: Free Press, 1993. Duke, Buchanan in Race.” Chicago Tribune, 12 Jan- ----------. T h e Evolution of American Holocaust Revi- uary 1992, sec. I, p. 4. sionism.” In Remembering for the Future: Working Collins, Ronald K. L. T o rt Case as Gag Device.” Na- Papers and Addenda. Ed. Yehuda Bauer et al. New tional Law Journal, 15 June 1992, pp. 15-16. York: Pergamon Press, 1989,3:2579-2593. Cooper, Mary H. T h e Growing Danger of Hate ----------. “Holocaust-Denial and the Compelling Force of Groups.” Editorial Research Reports, no. 18 (12 May Reason. Patterns of Prejudice 26, nos. 1-2 (1992): 1989): 262-275. Corn, David. “Congressman, Take Hitler's Monetary Pol- 64-76. May, Michael. “Denying the Holocaust: The Back- icy. ..r The Nation 249 (11 December 1989): 708. ground, Methods and Motives of the ’Revisionists.’ ” Crawford, Fred R. T h e Holocaust and the Big Lie” [2 Index on Censorship 14 (December 1985): 29-33. parts]. Martyrdom and Resistance 8 (January-Feb- Perry, Marvin. “Denying the Holocaust: History as Myth ruary 1982): 6,12; and 8 (March-April 1982): 6. and Delusion.” Encore American & Worldwide News Degler, Carl N. ‘Bad History?” Commentary 71 (June 9 (September 1981): 2fr-32. 1981): 17. 18 Holocaust-Denial Literature Delloff, Linda Marie. “Revising Holocaust History: Mal- sional Leaders. Ed. Marcia Sachs Littell. Lewiston, ice in the Mails.” Christian Century 97 (16 July 1980): NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1985, pp. 107-112. 724-725. “Middle America Responds to Holocaust Deniers.” Re- Downey, Dennis B. “Conference Report: Revisionism sponse 11 (August 1990): 19-20. and the Holocaust." OAH Newsietter2\ (February Mintz, Frank P. The Liberty Lobby and the American 1993): 9,11. Right: Race, Conspiracy, and Culture. Westport, CT: Drobnicki, John A. “Execution and Extermination.” New Greenwood Press, 1985. York Times Book Review, 27 December 1992, p. 4. Morton, Roger. “Truth Not Freedom.” School and Col- ---------- .
Recommended publications
  • Impossible, Yet Real! 187

    Impossible, Yet Real! 187

    CULTURA CULTURA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE CULTURA AND AXIOLOGY Founded in 2004, Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy 2011 of Culture and Axiology is a semiannual peer-reviewed jour- 1 2011 Vol VIII No 1 nal devoted to philosophy of culture and the study of value. It aims to promote the exploration of different values and cultural phenomena in regional and international contexts. The editorial board encourages the submission of manuscripts based on original research that are judged to make a novel and important contribution to understanding the values and cultural phenomena in the contemporary world. CULTURE AND AXIOLOGY CULTURE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL ISBN 978-3-89975-251-9 CULTURA CULTURA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE CULTURA AND AXIOLOGY Founded in 2004, Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy 2011 of Culture and Axiology is a semiannual peer-reviewed jour- 1 2011 Vol VIII No 1 nal devoted to philosophy of culture and the study of value. It aims to promote the exploration of different values and cultural phenomena in regional and international contexts. The editorial board encourages the submission of manuscripts based on original research that are judged to make a novel and important contribution to understanding the values and cultural phenomena in the contemporary world. CULTURE AND AXIOLOGY CULTURE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL CULTURA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE AND AXIOLOGY Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology E-ISSN (Online): 2065-5002 (Published online by Versita, Solipska 14A/1, 02-482 Warsaw, Poland) ISSN (Print): 1584-1057 Advisory Board Prof.
  • Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism in Iran: the Role of Identity Processes

    Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism in Iran: the Role of Identity Processes

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Nottingham Trent Institutional Repository (IRep) 1 Anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism in Iran: the role of identity processes Rusi Jaspal De Montfort University, Leicester, UK Anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism constitute two important ideological building blocks of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Yet, there is no existing research into the psychosocial motives underlying the manifestation of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism at the institutional level in Iran. Here it is argued that there is much heuristic and predictive value in applying tenets of identity process theory (IPT), a socio-psychological model of identity threat and action, to the primarily socio-historical literature on anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism in Iran. The paper provides a summary of anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism and ‘new anti-Semitism’ and IPT. The substantive section of the paper explores (i) how anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism may restore feelings of belonging in the Muslim world and beyond; (ii) the inter-relations between ingroup and outgroup self-efficacy; (iii) the psychosocial motivation to maintain Shiite ideology and Khomeini’s legacy; and (iv) the construction of Jews and Israel in terms of a threat to group continuity. It is suggested that insights into the motivational principles underlying anti-Semitism and anti- Zionism at the institutional level may inform empirical research into social representations of Jews and Israel in Iran. More broadly, this paper highlights the potential contribution of social psychology to existing work on anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism in the humanities.
  • Hosting the 'Holohoax': a Snapshot of Holocaust Denial Across Social Media

    Hosting the 'Holohoax': a Snapshot of Holocaust Denial Across Social Media

    COVID-19 disinformation briefingISD Briefing No.2 HostingFar-right the m ‘Holohoax’obilisation 10th9th August April 2020 2020 COVIDHosting-19 the disinformation ‘Holohoax’: A Snapshotbriefing of Holocaust no. 2 Denial Across Social Media Far-rightJakob Guhl mobilisation & Jacob Davey This is the second in a series of briefings from ISD’s Digital Research Unit on the information ecosystem around coronavirus (COVID-19). These briefings expose how Executivetechnology platformsSummary are being used to promote disinformation, hate, extremism and authoritarianism in the context of COVID-19. It is based on ISD’s mixture of natural Overviewlanguage processing, network analysis and ethnographic online research. This briefing Holocaustfocuses denialon the has way long far-right been one groups of the most and insidious individuals conspiracy are mobilising theories targeting around Jewish COVID-19 in communities,the with US. its The extremist first proponents briefing drawnin the from series across can the be ideological found on spectrum, ISD’s website. from extreme right-wing to hard left to Islamist. Research has shown that digital platforms have only served to amplify and mainstream this warped strain of thinking inTop recent Lines years.1 Far-rightThis briefing groups paper andprovides individuals a snapshot are of Holocaust denialAntisemitic content acrossspeech major and social ideas media are beingplatforms. opportunisticallyBy analysing the term using ‘holohoax’, the ongoingwhich is commonly usedadapted by Holocaust to incorporate deniers,
  • HOLOCAUST DENIAL* Denial of the Truth of the Holocaust Comes in Three Modes. One Mode Is Seldom Recognized: Bracketing the SHOAH with Other Mass Murders in History

    HOLOCAUST DENIAL* Denial of the Truth of the Holocaust Comes in Three Modes. One Mode Is Seldom Recognized: Bracketing the SHOAH with Other Mass Murders in History

    HOLOCAUST DENIAL* Denial of the truth of the Holocaust comes in three modes. One mode is seldom recognized: bracketing the SHOAH with other mass murders in history. This mode of generalization flattens out the specificity and denies the uniqueness of the Holocaust. Unpleasant ethical, moral and theological issues are thereby stifled. The Holocaust is swallowed up in the mighty river of wickedness and mass murder that has characterized human history since the mind of man runneth not to the contrary. From the balcony - a perch often preferred by the privileged and/or educated - all violence down there seems remote. A second mode of denial is. encountered as an expression of Jewish preciousness. More or less bluntly, the position is taken that the Holocaust cannot be understood by a person who is not a Jew. This is a very dangerous posture, for by it the gentile - whether perpetrator or spectator - is home free. Why should he accept responsibility for an action whose significance, he is assured by the victims, is outside his universe of discourse? The third mode of denial, in nature and expression more often in the public view, is intellectually less interesting. Like the thought world of its purveyers, it is marked by banality. What interest does a thinking person have in debating whether or not the earth is flat? Nevertheless, the third mode of denial is alive and well. In large areas dominated by Christian, Jewish or Muslim fundamentalism, the facts are denied. In pristine condition, none of the three great monotheistic religions has need to deny the *by Franklin H.
  • This Thesis Comes Within Category D

    This Thesis Comes Within Category D

    * SHL ITEM BARCODE 19 1721901 5 REFERENCE ONLY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THESIS Degree Year i ^Loo 0 Name of Author COPYRIGHT This Is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London, it is an unpubfished typescript and the copyright is held by the author. All persons consulting the thesis must read and abide by the Copyright Declaration below. COPYRIGHT DECLARATION I recognise that the copyright of the above-described thesis rests with the author and that no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. LOANS Theses may not be lent to individuals, but the Senate House Library may lend a copy to approved libraries within the United Kingdom, for consultation solely on the .premises of those libraries. Application should be made to: Inter-Library Loans, Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. REPRODUCTION University of London theses may not be reproduced without explicit written permission from the Senate House Library. Enquiries should be addressed to the Theses Section of the Library. Regulations concerning reproduction vary according to the date of acceptance of the thesis and are listed below as guidelines. A. Before 1962. Permission granted only upon the prior written consent of the author. (The Senate House Library will provide addresses where possible). B. 1962 -1974. In many cases the author has agreed to permit copying upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. C. 1975 -1988. Most theses may be copied upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. D. 1989 onwards. Most theses may be copied.
  • Anton Maegerle Die Iranische Rechtsextremisten-Connection

    Anton Maegerle Die Iranische Rechtsextremisten-Connection

    www.doew.at Anton Maegerle Die iranische Rechtsextremisten-Connection Ersterschienen im Vierteljahresheft Tribüne. Zeitschrift zum Verständnis des Judentums (Frankfurt am Main). 2. Quartal 2006, Heft 178. Hier: ergänzte Fassung. Irans Staatspräsident Mahmud Ahmadinedschad hat seit seinem Amtsantritt im August 2005 in Verbalattacken wiederholt den Holocaust bezweifelt und Israel als „Krebsgeschwür“ bezeichnet. Ahmadinedschad und führende Re- präsentanten des Gottesstaates haben mehrfach angekündigt eine so genannte „Holocaust-Untersuchung“ abhalten zu wollen. „Es ist das erste Mal in der Geschichte der Holocaust-Weltpolitik, daß eine ganze Regierung den jüdischen Holocaust einer freien wissenschaftlichen Prüfung, unterzieht“ – jubilierte die in rechtsextremen Kreisen einflussreiche antisemitische HetzpostillePhoenix .1 Als „Holocaust-Experten“ sind die Namen von einschlägigen Holocaustleug- nern im Gespräch. Irans Außenminister Manuchehr Mottaki bezeichnete im Februar 2006 das Urteil gegen den britischen Holocaustleugner David Irving (Jg. 1938) als „westliches Paradox“. Der Westen fordere Meinungsfreiheit, praktiziere aber das Gegenteil. „Wir verstehen nicht, warum der Westen so verzweifelt darauf besteht, dieses Verbrechen begangen und genau sechs Mil- lionen getötet zu haben“, sagte Mottaki.2 Irving war zuvor vom Wiener Straf- landesgericht zu einer dreijährigen Haftstrafe wegen nationalsozialistischer Wiederbetätigung verurteilt worden. Weithin unbekannt ist die Tatsache, dass Rechtsextremisten seit dem Sieg der Islamischen Revolution 1979 enge Kontakte zum Iran pflegen. Gemeinsam sind den religiösen Fundamentalisten im Iran und den Rechtsextremisten unter- schiedlichster Couleur Feindbilder wie Antiliberalismus, Antiamerikanismus, Antisemitismus und Antizionismus. Islamisten und Rechtsextremisten pflegen ein ausgeprägtes Freund-Feind-Denken, propagieren die Ideologie der Un- gleichheit und lehnen die universalistische Geltung der Menschenrechte und Menschenwürde ab. 1 Phoenix 1/2006, S. 19. 2 Zit. nach Huber, Markus: Justizias Goldwaage, in: Tagesspiegel, 22.
  • Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine

    Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine

    www.doew.at Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: The Evolution of a Doctrine Published in: Hermann Kurthen/Rainer Erb/Werner Bergmann (ed.), Anti-Sem- itism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification, New York–Oxford 1997 Development of “revisionism” since 1945 Most people understand so called „revisionism“ as just another word for the movement of holocaust denial (Benz 1994; Lipstadt 1993; Shapiro 1990). Therefore it was suggested lately to use the word „negationism“ instead. How- ever in the author‘s point of view „revisionism“ covers some more topics than just the denying of the National Socialist mass murders. Especially in Germany and Austria there are some more points of National Socialist politics some people have tried to minimize or apologize since 1945, e. g. the responsibility for World War II, the attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 (quite a modern topic), (the discussion) about the number of the victims of the holocaust a. s. o.. In the seventies the late historian Martin Broszat already called that movement „run- ning amok against reality“ (Broszat 1976). These pseudo-historical writers, many of them just right wing extremist publishers or people who quite rapidly turned to right wing extremists, really try to prove that history has not taken place, just as if they were able to make events undone by denying them. A conception of “negationism” (Auerbach 1993a; Fromm and Kernbach 1994, p. 9; Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz 1994) or “holocaust denial” (Lipstadt 1993, p. 20) would neglect the additional components of “revision- ism”, which are logically connected with the denying of the holocaust, this being the extreme variant.
  • Das Internet Und Die Leugnung Des Holocaust

    Das Internet Und Die Leugnung Des Holocaust

    Bei dieser Arbeit handelt es sich um eine Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit, die an der Universität Kassel angefertigt wurde. Die hier veröffentlichte Version kann von der als Prüfungsleistung eingereichten Version geringfügig abweichen. Weitere Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeiten finden Sie hier: https://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2011040837235 Diese Arbeit wurde mit organisatorischer Unterstützung des Zentrums für Lehrerbildung der Universität Kassel veröffentlicht. Informationen zum ZLB finden Sie unter folgendem Link: www.uni-kassel.de/zlb Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit im Rahmen der Ersten Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien im Fach Geschichte Eingereicht dem Amt für Lehrerbildung Prüfungsstelle Kassel Thema: „Das Internet und die Leugnung des Holocaust. Neue Perspektiven in deutschsprachigen Veröffentlichungen“ Vorgelegt von: Dennis Beismann 2011 Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Friedhelm Boll Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung............................................................................................................1 1.1 Stand der Forschung.....................................................................................3 1.1.1 Publikationen aus den Jahren 1970 bis 1993........................................3 1.1.2 Holocaustleugnende Publikationen im Internet....................................4 1.2 Anlage der Studie.........................................................................................7 1.2.1 Fragestellung.........................................................................................7
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography

    Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
  • Holocaust Denial in Australia

    Holocaust Denial in Australia

    ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of Holocaust denial in Australia. It does so through a study of the beliefs and activities of the three organizations for whom Holocaust denial is a central belief: the Australian League of Rights, the Australian Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Adelaide Institute. Their activities, their international ties, and their relationship with the broader racist Right in Australia is considered. The paper concludes by reflecting on the future directions and responses to Holocaust denial. INTRODUCTION The nature of Australian Holocaust denial organizations, their activities, and their place in broader far Right circles is different from denial organizations in other countries. This is explained by the dominant role of the Australian League of Rights in far Right politics, the civil liberties origins of the Australian Civil Liberties Union, the lack of sizeable neo- Nazi groups in Australia, and the dominance of anti-Aboriginal and anti- Asian issues on the far Right agenda. In addition, unlike many European countries where denial is explained as a response to their wartime collaboration with the Nazis, this motive does not exist in Australia which fought against the Nazis and her allies. Although Holocaust denial is a fringe activity in Australia, it has significantly increased over the last two decades with a concomitant growth in collaboration between Australian and overseas Holocaust deniers. This is not just a Jewish concern for Holocaust deniers have become a leading element within the racist Right with whom they share a common worldview. This is because in addition to their antisemitism, Australian Holocaust deniers expound racist and xenophobic policies and views.
  • Penalizing Holocaust Denial: a View from Europe

    Penalizing Holocaust Denial: a View from Europe

    Penalizing Holocaust Denial: A View from Europe Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias* The visual evidence and the verbal testimony of starvation, cruelty and bestiality were so overpowering as to leave me a bit sick. In one room, where [there] were piled up twenty or thirty naked men, killed by starvation, George Patton would not even enter. He said that he would get sick if he did so. I made the visit deliberately, in or- der to be in a position to give first-hand evidence of these things if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to “propaganda.” 1 General Dwight D. Eisenhower. The alleged Hitlerian gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which permitted a gigantic financial swindle whose chief beneficiaries have been the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose main victims have been the German people and the Palestinian people as a whole. 2 Robert Faurisson. I. INTRODUCTION Incorporating Holocaust denial into the catalogue of issues governed by legal provi- sions, and in particular by the provisions of criminal law, raises a number of under- standable doubts. Aside from the controversies related to the indisputable interference with freedom of speech, there are problems concerning the form of legal provisions that would ban the dissemination of the negationists’ theories, as well as difficulties in guaranteeing the effectiveness and consistency of their proper enforcement.3 * Research Assistant, Poznań Human Rights Centre, Institute of Legal Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences; Graduate Fellow, Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti- semitism (YIISA), Yale University.
  • Critiques of Cultural Decadence and Decline in British

    Critiques of Cultural Decadence and Decline in British

    Purifying the Nation: British Neo-Fascist Ideas on Representations of Culture Steven Woodbridge, Kingston University Paper for the ‘Dangerous Representations’ multi-disciplinary Conference, Sussex University, June, 2001 Introduction Although fascism and neo-fascism have emphasised ‘action’ in politics, we should not underestimate the extent to which far right ideologues have sought to engage in the intellectual and cultural arena. This paper investigates the ideas, attitudes and discourse of the post-1945 British far right concerning representations of culture. I will argue that the ideological texts of the far right show a recurrent concern with the need for the so-called ‘purification’ of national culture. In essence, there is a belief expounded by the extreme right that ‘liberal’ cultural forms have resulted in national decadence, in turn showing the extent to which the nation itself is in serious decline. Consequently, there has been a consistent call in far right texts and statements for the ‘regeneration’ of the nation, together with the expression of a conviction that national culture requires ‘cleansing’ as part of this ambitious project. The far right’s key ideologues in Britain have regularly expressed views on what constitutes ‘true’, legitimate and authentically ‘British’ cultural representations, and they have often pointed to what is (in their estimation) ‘decadent’ versus ‘healthy’ cultural and national identities. It is intended in this paper to illustrate the far right’s prescription for political and cultural renewal through a brief exploration of the intellectual texts of three neo- fascist movements operating after 1945: the Union Movement (UM), formed in 1948, the National Front (NF), formed in 1967, and the British National Party (BNP), 1 formed in 1982.