DOCSLIB.ORG

Impossible, Yet Real! 187

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TRUA CLU

CULTURA

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE AND AXIOLOGY

CULTURA

Founded in 2004, Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology is a semiannual peer-reviewed journal devoted to philosophy of culture and the study of value. It aims to promote the exploration of different values and cultural phenomena in regional and international contexts. The editorial board encourages the submission of manuscripts based on original research that are judged to make a novel and important contribution to understanding the values and cultural phenomena in the contemporary world.

2011
1

  • 2011
  • Vol VIII
  • No 1

ISBN 978-3-89975-251-9

TRUA CLU

CULTURA

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE AND AXIOLOGY

CULTURA

Founded in 2004, Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology is a semiannual peer-reviewed journal devoted to philosophy of culture and the study of value. It aims to promote the exploration of different values and cultural phenomena in regional and international contexts. The editorial board encourages the submission of manuscripts based on original research that are judged to make a novel and important contribution to understanding the values and cultural phenomena in the contemporary world.

2011
1

  • 2011
  • Vol VIII
  • No 1

CULTURA

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE AND AXIOLOGY

Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology E-ISSN (Online): 2065-5002 (Published online by Versita, Solipska 14A/1, 02-482 Warsaw, Poland) ISSN (Print): 1584-1057

Advisory Board Prof. dr. Mario Perniola, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy Prof. dr. Paul Cruysberghs, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium Prof. dr. Michael Jennings, Princeton University, USA Prof. Emeritus dr. Horst Baier, University of Konstanz, Germany Prof. dr. José María Paz Gago, University of Coruña, Spain Prof. dr. Maximiliano E. Korstanje, John F. Kennedy University, Buenos Aires, Argentina Prof. dr. Nic Gianan, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines Prof. dr. Alexandru Boboc, Correspondent member of the Romanian Academy, Romania Prof. dr. Teresa Castelao-Lawless, Grand Valley State University, USA Prof. dr. Richard L. Lanigan, Southern Illinois University, USA Prof. dr. Fernando Cipriani, G.d’Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, Italy Prof. dr. Elif Cirakman, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Prof. dr. David Cornberg, University Ming Chuan, Taiwan Prof. dr. Carmen Cozma, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iassy, Romania Prof. dr. Nancy Billias, Department of Philosophy, Saint Joseph College, Hartford, USA Prof. dr. Christian Möckel, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany Prof. dr. Leszek S. Pyra, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Poland Prof. dr. A. L. Samian, National University of Malaysia Prof. dr. Dimitar Sashev, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Prof. dr. Kiymet Selvi, Anadolu University, Istanbul, Turkey Prof. dr. Traian D. Stănciulescu, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iassy, Romania Prof. dr. Gloria Vergara, University of Colima, Mexico

Editorial Board

  • Editor-in-Chief:
  • Co-Editors:

Prof. dr. Nicolae Râmbu Faculty of Philosophy and SocialPolitical Sciences Alexandru Ioan Cuza University B-dul Carol I, nr. 11, 700506 Iasi, Romania [email protected]
Prof. dr. Aldo Marroni Facoltà di Scienze Sociali Università degli Studi G. d’Annunzio Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100 Chieti Scalo, Italy [email protected]

  • Executive Editor:
  • PD Dr. Till Kinzel

  • Dr. Simona Mitroiu
  • Englisches Seminar

Human Sciences Research Department Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Lascar Catargi, nr. 54, 700107 Iasi, Romania [email protected]
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Bienroder Weg 80, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany [email protected]

Editorial Asssitants: Radu Vasile Chialda, Adina Romanescu, Marius Sidoriuc, Daniel Ungureanu Designer: Aritia Poenaru

Editorial Office Address: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Philosophy and Social-Political Sciences, The Seminar of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, Carol I, nr. 11, 700506, Iasi, Romania, Tel.:0040/232/201054; Fax: 0040/232/201154; e-mail: [email protected]

Indexing and Abstracting: Thomson Reuters (ISI) – Arts & Humanities Citation Index; EBSCO Humanities International Index; EBSCO Humanities International Complete; SCOPUS (Elsevier); MLA International Bibliography; The International Consortium for the Advancement of Academic Publication (ICAAP); Summon by Serial Solutions; Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory

Cultura

International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology

Vol. 8, No. 1 (2011)

Editor-in-Chief Nicolae Râmbu

Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar.

© 2011 Martin Meidenbauer Verlagsbuchhandlung, München

Umschlagabbildung: © Aritia Poenaru Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Dieses Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der Grenzen des Urhebergesetzes ohne schriftliche Zustimmung des Verlages ist unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für Nachdruck, auch auszugsweise, Reproduktion, Vervielfältigung, Übersetzung, Mikroverfilmung sowie Digitalisierung oder Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung auf Tonträgern und in elektronischen Systemen aller Art.

ISBN 978-3-89975-251-9 Verlagsverzeichnis schickt gern: Martin Meidenbauer Verlagsbuchhandlung Schwanthalerstr. 81 D-80336 München

www.m-verlag.net

CONTENTS
DEBATES and DIRECTIONS. AFRICAN STUDIES

Anton CARPINSCHI, Bilakani TONYEME

Cultural Minorities and Intercultural Dialogue in the Dynamics of

  • Globalization. African Participation
  • 7

Jacob Ale AIGBODIOH

Stigmatization in African Communalistic Societies and Habermas’

  • Theory of Rationality
  • 27

Justina O. EHIAKHAMEN

The Practice of Inheritance in Esan: the Place of the Female Child 49

Nicolito A. GIANAN

  • Delving into the Ethical Dimension of Ubuntu Philosophy
  • 63

Uyi-Ekpen OGBEIDE, Lambert Uyi EDIGIN

Military Establishments and The Stability Of Nigeria’s Fourth

  • Republic: Toward The Realization Of Vision 2020
  • 83

93

Elvis IMAFIDON

Rethinking the Individual’s Place in an African (Esan) Ontology

Francis Xavier GICHURU

Creating a New Society, New Nation and New Leadership Quality in

  • Kenya through African Traditional Education Principles
  • 111

127

Solomon A. LALEYE

Democracy in Conflict and Conflicts in Democracy: The Nigerian Experience

VIEWS upon ETHICS, TRUTH and LANGUAGE

Jim I. UNAH

  • Self-discovery: Who am I? An Ontologized Ethics of Self-mastery
  • 143

159

Seungbae PARK

Defence of Cultural Relativism

Simona MODREANU

A Different Approach to the “Theater of the Absurd”. With

  • Special Reference to Eugene Ionesco
  • 171

187

Mario PERNIOLA

Impossible, yet real!

Simona MITROIU

To collect in order to survive: Benjamin and the necessity of collecting 213

Radu Vasile CHIALDA

  • Weak Barbarism
  • 223

10.3726/975251_187

Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology 8(1)/2011: 187–212

Impossible, yet Real!1

Mario PERNIOLA

Dipartimento di Ricerche Filosofiche
Università di Roma “Tor Vergata” Via Columbia 1 00133 Roma, Italy [email protected] http://www.marioperniola.it/site/index.asp

Abstract. In order to properly understand the period which begins at the end of the '60s last century, this must not be described anymore using the traditional categories of culture and politics. Facing events like those in May '68 in France, the Italian revolution in 1979, the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989, the attack against the Twin Towers from New York in September 2001, we are all tempted to say “impossible, yet real”. These events had immense consequences upon the individual and collective life, provoking radical upturns of traditional values and of the way people relate to these values. Thus, a new form of historicity was born, having as characteristics the perception of some phenomena both as miracles and traumas, because they seem impossible to explain rationally. In this text both the axiological mutations that occurred in the history of the last decades and the meanings of these mutations are presented in a personal way. Keywords: Cultural Studies, advertising imperialism, communication miracles and traumas, cultural memory, Georges Bataille

Rarely, and only in very recent times, has humanity asked itself the question of the sense of what it is to live individually and collectively: a vast majority of human beings in the past have been absorbed by the concern of being able to survive and possibly live with less effort and more available goods. The sense of individual and collective life was not a problem, because the answer was already provided by the social condition in which it was born, and from handed down knowledge and rituals.
Still, in modern times, especially in the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century, in the West, especially by the classes that had reached well-being through the exercise of administrative, commercial and industrial, the tendency to look also at the unfolding of individual and social life of the existence of rational principles developed. In addition, the laws, similarly to what happened in the sciences, would have allowed not

187

Mario PERNIOLA / Impossible, yet real!

only to understand what was happening, but even to foresee what would have happened without resorting to divination and magic arts. The great flowering of literal fiction and historiography in the nineteenth and twentieth century responded to the pretension to grant a new and original sense to the lives of individuals and communities in order to insert them in a development plan that could identify, with relative reliability, the signs of progress or regress in the conduct of personal affairs, family, institutional, economic, political, social and cultural rights in order to allow the possibility of a capable action that could intervene effectively on the course of events. All this immense work of private and collective rationalization of life, on which Western civilization is founded and that has ensured the world’s conquest, worked well enough until the end of the Second World War, finding its fulfilment in the victory over the Nazis and Fascism and in the enslavement of a great culture that was able to subtract itself from the Euro-American colonization, the Japanese one. Despite the countless horrors, murders, massacres, genocides and various disasters that punctuated this period of history, there are a number of explanations for these events, different and even opposed to each other, which provide a plausible key to the reading.
The generations that grew up after the end of the Second World War did not inherit this idea of the world being based on the vital importance of individual and collective action and on the rational and progressive nature of history; such a conception has become more alien to them as their birth was at the end of the Second World War. They were witnesses to unpredictable events, whose significance is still opaque and indecipherable as long as it uses the concepts and notions that have dominated the first half of the 19th and 20th centuries. These generations are therefore now in the condition that they have not yet understood anything about the events they have lived through and in which, sometimes, they have even considered playing a leading role.
Since the end of the Second World War, four unpredictable events have happened in the West that surprised even the most informed members of the public: the French protests in May 1968, the Iranian revolution of February 1979, the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989 and the attack on the Twin Towers in New York in September 2001. In relation to these facts, the vast majority of people have made of their property a phrase by French writer Georges Bataille, impossible et pourtant là, “impossible, and yet here”. In fact, many had predicted that the revolt of

188

Mario PERNIOLA / Impossible, yet real!

the Parisian students would have led to the largest wildcat strike in history? That a monarchy supported by the strong Americans and a ruthless repressive system would be overthrown in a few months after a popular uprising led by clergy? That a regime built on a dense network of police informers and spies would dissipate so quickly? That nineteen suicide bombers would be able to successfully carry out a devastating attack on American soil?
It is known that contemporaries are not the best experts of their present; most people do not live in actuality, and even the most informed can be wrong. The example of Lenin became proverbial, that a few weeks before the outbreak of the Russian revolution, he said to the Swiss workers that it would have died before it would take place. In principle, the sense of what was experienced individually and collectively was discovered at the end. It has always been difficult to predict the future; nevertheless, the subsequent events, up to the 1960s, have a more refractory aspect that make use of modern historical and ideological categories.
These events appear to be more like miracles as fulfilment processes for which you know the performance or achievements of utopias; more like traumas than like tragedies or disasters of which it is possible to elaborate the mourning. Certainly, it is when human society seems to become more rational, thanks to extraordinary scientific technological inventions, burst into the individual experience and historical facts that seem to belong on the horizon, characterized by irrationality that belongs to the religious and scientific horizon more than to the scientific and philosophical, more to psychotic syndromes than the explosion of contradictions or to crises that can be overcome.
If you look at the real truth of things, the four facts that have been discussed are less important than they seem at first sight. In 1968, after the wildcat strike, everyone went back to work. The Iranian revolution did not spread itself to all of Islam and remained confined to a single country. The socioeconomic status of East Germans is still much lower in respect to the West Germans. The damage caused by the attack to the Twin Towers were, from a military point of view, insignificant. These facts, taken one by one and isolated from their consequences, are ironic. About the French

protests in May 1968, a philosopher said: le sang n'a pas coulè,, donc rien s'est

passé (“blood has not poured, then nothing has happened”). In the Iranian case, a lot of blood poured, but the revolution did not achieve what was

189

Mario PERNIOLA / Impossible, yet real!

proposed. As to the fall of the Berlin Wall, a famous aphorism, made by Stanislaw Lec, is considered: “A better tomorrow does not give the certainty of an even better day after tomorrow.” As for the Twin Towers, it is still Lec that helps us: “Who knows? Perhaps the walls of Jericho collapsed because of too much trumpeting inside?” It is tempting to share the ironic attitude that the German historian Jakob Burckhardt had against the historical process. But yet, who can deny the imaginative and emotional impact that these four events have unleashed?
We must deepen the notions of miracle and trauma to understand how much they are far from sensitive and philosophical, political and social categories, of the 19th and early 20th centuries. For Bataille, miracle defines the experience of sovereignty that appears when we can get away from the world of utility and access a full experience of the present. This occurs, according to Bataille, in a series of events that include art and the sacred, laughter and tears, sexuality and death. The meeting with these events generates a kind of exhilaration, a miraculous sensation, the entrance into an extraordinary condition that emancipates from the everyday life chains. Therefore, the end must not be considered with exclusive reference to transcendence. For Bataille, the words miracle and miraculeux are considered in a literal sense, from the Latin mirus, which means wonderful, amazing and surprising. The context to which Bataille refers to in the miracle is connected with the etymology of mirus that has affinities with the IndoEuropean root from the Greek µειδιώ, which means smile. Moreover, only human beings smile. If in other books Bataille was the founder of erotic anthropology, which saw precisely the distinctive character of human beings in eroticism, here the direction seems to go towards a smiling anthropology: in fact, the miraculous instant is when waiting ends in nothing! Bataille seems to repeat Kant’s famous definition, that laughter is a condition resulting from a tense expectation, which all of a sudden vanishes. The French expression impossible et pourtant là, shows a peculiarity of the French language which is very significant. It affects primarily the fact that the French là is equal to the Italian qui. For example, the

expression Que fais-tu-là? means “What are you doing here?”. Les faits sont là means “These are the facts”. Impossible et pourtant là! This French

expression is untranslatable into other languages, but it expresses very well the strangeness of these four events. It implies a certain shift, a décalage, a shift compared to the real truth of things because in French you use là instead of ici. The French adverb there is ambivalent; it implicates both

190

Mario PERNIOLA / Impossible, yet real!

presence and distance. It is a very important nuance. In fact, it refers to another that does not end with the fact itself, but involves a vastly wider variety of memories and expectations, illusions and interests. So it is not wrong to attribute to these facts a paradigmatic meaning that transforms and divides the four different epochs: the age of communication, of deregulation, of challenge and finally of assessment.
As known, for Bataille, the sovereign moments for excellence, in which an unexpected thing occurs, hitherto considered impossible, those are the ones in which death and sexuality approach until they merge with each other. But here we are dealing with facts that regard, not only private experiences but also collective ones, “the story” so to say. Certainly, also for Bataille, the story was the subject of a constant and persistent reflection; yet he thought of sovereignty almost always with reference to ancient times in space or time. It’s the anthropology and antiquity that provide references and examples of public sovereignty, not the world of his time: the potlatch, the pyramids, the sacrifices, the great art of the past. Capitalism and communism, the two models of society that were opposed in his time, for him remain submissive to the slavish logic of labour and of utility, and therefore an inaccessible raid of the impossible et pourtant là.
Bataille died in 1962 and a few months later, the world’s order of the victorious powers of the Second World War seemed to show some signs of abating. Because of the installation of missile bases in Cuba, where Castro had established a communist regime, relations between the United States and the Soviet Union seemed on the verge of irreparable rupture. A third world war seemed imminent, but it did not occur! However, instead of the logic of economy and work, which was the subject of criticism of Bataille, on the horizon appears the aesthetics of consumerism and entertainment. The homo ludens, who had been placed into the corner by the homo laborans from 19th century rationalism, makes his big return, and expects his well-being from the goddess Fortuna: miracle takes the place of the programmatic plan, the expectation takes the place of the unexpected, and the wonderful takes that place of the interesting. Surrealism no longer has any reason to exist because it is fulfilled: what is wonderful is available to all.
Western society slowly began to be pervaded by a miraculous mindset, which spread to a vital contribution and was, by the development of a techno-science, seen as a science fiction about to take place, significantly accompanied by a decline in the main part of the population of elemen-

191

Mario PERNIOLA / Impossible, yet real!

tary scientific and technical knowledge. A more important contribution to the advent of a miraculous mindset was given by the means of mass communication that since the early 1960s had played a much greater role than in the past, for the spread of television and the feedback effect exerted on those that acted. It is impossible et pourtant là to say there are not only spectators but also actors in the events, who are the first to be amazed at the emphasis placed by the media on their performance the and interest with which they follow the developments. Their words and their communications immediately become an essential part of the event, influencing in a very relevant way its development, the real effectual truth of what is submerged and disappeared under a huge amount of words and images broadcasted all around the world.
This “mediatic miraculousism” generates in everyone an absolute outof-proportion excitement with respect to the effective weight of the events that occur and that are often actually unheard of, but hides a historical situation that stopped at the end of the Second World War. There are, however, the winners of the Second World War, who firmly keep in their hands the destiny of the world through the polling station votes, with the right of veto that the occupy at ONU, and a dense financial, economic and military network that are not so transparent.
When this balance seems to be endangered, it is more or less promptly recovered. For example, in 1971, in a period of great financial uncertainty because of the collapse of the international monetary system established at Bretton Woods in 1944, the United Nations polling station votes with the right of veto occupied by Taiwan was given as an American initiative to China. Similarly, in the years after 1991 it was in the interest of the other four great powers to avoid the collapse of the Soviet Union, as it could have led to a civil war and permitted Russia to return to be a great nation. Considering all, even in that way it went wrong! The Cold War never became hot, the conflicts remained local, the successes of Islamist terrorism, soaking America and Europe into a climate of fear, have so far prevented that the alternative globalization movement (Seattle in December 1999, Genoa in July 2001, London and hundreds of other cities in the world in February 2003) achieving a real political significance, creating uncontrollable scenarios and letting other countries and continents into the game.
Also on the horizons and prospects of individual lives, it is worth asking whether what happened was really important: the life of the

Recommended publications
  • This Thesis Comes Within Category D

    This Thesis Comes Within Category D

    * SHL ITEM BARCODE 19 1721901 5 REFERENCE ONLY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THESIS Degree Year i ^Loo 0 Name of Author COPYRIGHT This Is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London, it is an unpubfished typescript and the copyright is held by the author. All persons consulting the thesis must read and abide by the Copyright Declaration below. COPYRIGHT DECLARATION I recognise that the copyright of the above-described thesis rests with the author and that no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. LOANS Theses may not be lent to individuals, but the Senate House Library may lend a copy to approved libraries within the United Kingdom, for consultation solely on the .premises of those libraries. Application should be made to: Inter-Library Loans, Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. REPRODUCTION University of London theses may not be reproduced without explicit written permission from the Senate House Library. Enquiries should be addressed to the Theses Section of the Library. Regulations concerning reproduction vary according to the date of acceptance of the thesis and are listed below as guidelines. A. Before 1962. Permission granted only upon the prior written consent of the author. (The Senate House Library will provide addresses where possible). B. 1962 -1974. In many cases the author has agreed to permit copying upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. C. 1975 -1988. Most theses may be copied upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. D. 1989 onwards. Most theses may be copied.
  • Revisiting Zero Hour 1945

    Revisiting Zero Hour 1945

    REVISITING ZERO-HOUR 1945 THE EMERGENCE OF POSTWAR GERMAN CULTURE edited by STEPHEN BROCKMANN FRANK TROMMLER VOLUME 1 American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University REVISITING ZERO-HOUR 1945 THE EMERGENCE OF POSTWAR GERMAN CULTURE edited by STEPHEN BROCKMANN FRANK TROMMLER HUMANITIES PROGRAM REPORT VOLUME 1 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. ©1996 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 0-941441-15-1 This Humanities Program Volume is made possible by the Harry & Helen Gray Humanities Program. Additional copies are available for $5.00 to cover postage and handling from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Suite 420, 1400 16th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-2217. Telephone 202/332-9312, Fax 202/265- 9531, E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.aicgs.org ii F O R E W O R D Since its inception, AICGS has incorporated the study of German literature and culture as a part of its mandate to help provide a comprehensive understanding of contemporary Germany. The nature of Germany’s past and present requires nothing less than an interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of German society and culture. Within its research and public affairs programs, the analysis of Germany’s intellectual and cultural traditions and debates has always been central to the Institute’s work. At the time the Berlin Wall was about to fall, the Institute was awarded a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities to help create an endowment for its humanities programs.
  • Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine

    Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine

    www.doew.at Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: The Evolution of a Doctrine Published in: Hermann Kurthen/Rainer Erb/Werner Bergmann (ed.), Anti-Sem- itism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification, New York–Oxford 1997 Development of “revisionism” since 1945 Most people understand so called „revisionism“ as just another word for the movement of holocaust denial (Benz 1994; Lipstadt 1993; Shapiro 1990). Therefore it was suggested lately to use the word „negationism“ instead. How- ever in the author‘s point of view „revisionism“ covers some more topics than just the denying of the National Socialist mass murders. Especially in Germany and Austria there are some more points of National Socialist politics some people have tried to minimize or apologize since 1945, e. g. the responsibility for World War II, the attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 (quite a modern topic), (the discussion) about the number of the victims of the holocaust a. s. o.. In the seventies the late historian Martin Broszat already called that movement „run- ning amok against reality“ (Broszat 1976). These pseudo-historical writers, many of them just right wing extremist publishers or people who quite rapidly turned to right wing extremists, really try to prove that history has not taken place, just as if they were able to make events undone by denying them. A conception of “negationism” (Auerbach 1993a; Fromm and Kernbach 1994, p. 9; Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz 1994) or “holocaust denial” (Lipstadt 1993, p. 20) would neglect the additional components of “revision- ism”, which are logically connected with the denying of the holocaust, this being the extreme variant.
  • FOR PROMOTING a DEMOCRATIC CULTURE of DEBATE Media Professionals' Handling of Anti-Democratic Populism

    FOR PROMOTING a DEMOCRATIC CULTURE of DEBATE Media Professionals' Handling of Anti-Democratic Populism

    IN COOPERATION WITH COLLECTION OF EXPERIENCES FOR PROMOTING A DEMOCRATIC CULTURE OF DEBATE Media professionals' handling of anti-democratic populism 1. BACKGROUND 2 2. COLLECTION OF EXPERIENCES 3 A. STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE MEDIA AND ITS CONSEQUENCES 3 B. JOURNALISTIC WORK WHEN DEALING WITH ANTI-DEMOCRATIC POPULISTS 5 C. GUIDELINE FOR ACTION IN YOUR OWN EDITORIAL TEAM 7 D. PARTICULAR CHALLENGES IN THE AREA OF SOCIAL MEDIA 8 E. DEALING WITH LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC IMAGES 10 F. THE NEED FOR FACT CHECKING 10 3. RECOMMENDED READING 12 4. ON THE AUTHORS | LEGAL NOTICE 13 COUNTERING POPULISM IN PUBLIC SPACE COLLECTION OF EXPERIENCES FOR PROMOTING A DEMOCRATIC CULTURE OF DEBATE IN COOPERATION WITH COLLECTION OF EXPERIENCES FOR PROMOTING A DEMOCRATIC CULTURE OF DEBATE 1. BACKGROUND as Progressive Zentrum promotes the improvement of should also convey subjective perspectives and the rivalry Dknowledge-sharing, particularly among young adults, between various political positions as foundations upon regarding the way journalism deals with anti-democratic which citizens can form a political opinion. In this regard, populism and its representatives in the public space. This pa- political information not only includes news coverage, but per builds on the expertise and experience of media profes- also the discussion and questioning of central political ac- sionals. During the "workshop for promoting a democratic tors, such as the federal government or the different parties. culture of debate" on 14 December 2018 in Berlin, they iden- tified challenges, pointed out problems and discussed solu- Over the past few years, media professionals have been faced tions. These recommendations for solutions are not univer- with greater challenges than they were previously used to sally applicable or exhaustive, but instead illustrate different in the German context.
  • Con-Scripting the Masses: False Documents and Historical Revisionism in the Americas

    Con-Scripting the Masses: False Documents and Historical Revisionism in the Americas

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Open Access Dissertations 2-2011 Con-Scripting the Masses: False Documents and Historical Revisionism in the Americas Frans Weiser University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Weiser, Frans, "Con-Scripting the Masses: False Documents and Historical Revisionism in the Americas" (2011). Open Access Dissertations. 347. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/347 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CON-SCRIPTING THE MASSES: FALSE DOCUMENTS AND HISTORICAL REVISIONISM IN THE AMERICAS A Dissertation Presented by FRANS-STEPHEN WEISER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2011 Program of Comparative Literature © Copyright 2011 by Frans-Stephen Weiser All Rights Reserved CON-SCRIPTING THE MASSES: FALSE DOCUMENTS AND HISTORICAL REVISIONISM IN THE AMERICAS A Dissertation Presented by FRANS-STEPHEN WEISER Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________________ David Lenson, Chair _______________________________________________
  • US Historians of Latin America and the Colonial Question

    US Historians of Latin America and the Colonial Question

    UC Santa Barbara Journal of Transnational American Studies Title Imperial Revisionism: US Historians of Latin America and the Spanish Colonial Empire (ca. 1915–1945) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/30m769ph Journal Journal of Transnational American Studies, 5(1) Author Salvatore, Ricardo D. Publication Date 2013 DOI 10.5070/T851011618 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/30m769ph#supplemental Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Imperial Revisionism: US Historians of Latin America and the Spanish Colonial Empire (ca. 1915–1945) RICARDO D. SALVATORE Since its inception, the discipline of Hispanic American history has been overshadowed by a dominant curiosity about the Spanish colonial empire and its legacy in Latin America. Carrying a tradition established in the mid-nineteenth century, the pioneers of the field (Bernard Moses and Edward G. Bourne) wrote mainly about the experience of Spanish colonialism in the Americas. The generation that followed continued with this line of inquiry, generating an increasing number of publications about the colonial period.1 The duration, organization, and principal institutions of the Spanish empire have drawn the attention of many historians who did their archival work during the early twentieth century and joined history departments of major US universities after the outbreak of World War I. The histories they wrote contributed to consolidating the field of Hispanic American history in the United States, producing important findings in a variety of themes related to the Spanish empire. It is my contention that this historiography was greatly influenced by the need to understand the role of the United States’ policies in the hemisphere.
  • The Case of Croatian Wikipedia: Encyclopaedia of Knowledge Or Encyclopaedia for the Nation?

    The Case of Croatian Wikipedia: Encyclopaedia of Knowledge Or Encyclopaedia for the Nation?

    The Case of Croatian Wikipedia: Encyclopaedia of Knowledge or Encyclopaedia for the Nation? 1 Authorial statement: This report represents the evaluation of the Croatian disinformation case by an external expert on the subject matter, who after conducting a thorough analysis of the Croatian community setting, provides three recommendations to address the ongoing challenges. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Wikimedia Foundation. The Wikimedia Foundation is publishing the report for transparency. Executive Summary Croatian Wikipedia (Hr.WP) has been struggling with content and conduct-related challenges, causing repeated concerns in the global volunteer community for more than a decade. With support of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees, the Foundation retained an external expert to evaluate the challenges faced by the project. The evaluation, conducted between February and May 2021, sought to assess whether there have been organized attempts to introduce disinformation into Croatian Wikipedia and whether the project has been captured by ideologically driven users who are structurally misaligned with Wikipedia’s five pillars guiding the traditional editorial project setup of the Wikipedia projects. Croatian Wikipedia represents the Croatian standard variant of the Serbo-Croatian language. Unlike other pluricentric Wikipedia language projects, such as English, French, German, and Spanish, Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia’s community was split up into Croatian, Bosnian, Serbian, and the original Serbo-Croatian wikis starting in 2003. The report concludes that this structure enabled local language communities to sort by points of view on each project, often falling along political party lines in the respective regions.
  • Encountering the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Catholic Epistemologies Across the Spanish Atlantic, 1687-1813

    Encountering the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Catholic Epistemologies Across the Spanish Atlantic, 1687-1813

    Encountering the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Catholic Epistemologies across the Spanish Atlantic, 1687-1813 by Copyright 2016 George Alan Klaeren Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________ Chairperson Dr. Luis Corteguera _______________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Kuznesof _______________________________ Dr. Robert Schwaller _______________________________ Dr. Marta Vicente _______________________________ Dr. Santa Arias Date Defended: February 23, 2017 ii The Dissertation Committee for George Alan Klaeren certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Encountering the Enlightenment: Science, Religion, and Catholic Epistemologies across the Spanish Atlantic, 1687-1813 _________________________________ Chairperson Dr. Luis Corteguera Date approved: February 23, 2017 iii ABSTRACT During the eighteenth century, a wave of thought inundated the Spanish empire, introducing new knowledge in the natural sciences, religion, and philosophy, and importantly, questioning the very modes of perceiving and ascertaining this knowledge. This period of epistemic rupture in Spain and her colonies, commonly referred to as the Enlightenment, not only presented new ways of knowing, but inspired impassioned debates among leading intellectuals about the epistemology and philosophy that continued throughout the century. The previous scholarly literature
  • Interrogating the Historical Revisionism of the Hungarian Right: the Queer Case of Ceć Ile Tormay Anita Kurimay Bryn Mawr College, Akurimay@Brynmawr.Edu

    Interrogating the Historical Revisionism of the Hungarian Right: the Queer Case of Ceć Ile Tormay Anita Kurimay Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]

    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College History Faculty Research and Scholarship History 2016 Interrogating the Historical Revisionism of the Hungarian Right: The Queer Case of Ceć ile Tormay Anita Kurimay Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/history_pubs Part of the History Commons Custom Citation A. Kurimay, "Interrogating the Historical Revisionism of the Hungarian Right: The Queer Case of Ceć ile Tormay." East European Politics and Societies 30 (2016): 10 – 33. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/history_pubs/21 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Anita Kurimay, “Interrogating the Historical Revisionism of the Hungarian Right: The Queer Case of Cécile Tormay.” East European Politics and Societies 30 (2016): 10 – 33. Abstract The article examines the historical processes and the motivations of contemporary Hungarian politicians to officially rehabilitate the memory of Cécile Tormay, the internationally acclaimed writer and founder of Hungary’s conservative women’s movement. Through tracing the politics of remembering Tormay since World War II it demonstrates how Tormay’s recent reemergence as a new national icon was intimately tied to a decisive shift in the direction of Hungarian politics from a pro-Western stance to one that is openly hostile towards Western liberalism. Tormay, part of the ruling elite in the authoritarian interwar Horthy regime, was a fierce anticommunist, antisemite, and staunch nationalist who rallied Hungarians to reclaim territories lost after World War I.
  • “Fake News” from the South: Tracking Disinformation Innovations And

    “Fake News” from the South: Tracking Disinformation Innovations And

    Submission to Harvard University Disinformation in Comparative Perspective Workshop by Jose Mari Lanuza, Jonathan Corpus Ong, Ross Tapsell TITLE: Evolutions of "Fake News" from the South: Tracking Disinformation Innovations and Interventions between the 2016 and 2019 Philippines Elections ABSTRACT: A Facebook executive famously called the Philippines as “patient zero” in the so-called "global misinformation epidemic", referring to how techniques of media manipulation were observed first in the 2016 Philippine election months before the Brexit vote in the UK and Trump’s election in the US. Indeed, some political pundits and journalists have expressed moral panics that Rodrigo Duterte's 2016 victory and continued popularity are outcomes of dark technological alchemy–from paid trolls to state-sponsored propaganda to even shadowy foreign influence, if we are to believe that data analytics firm Cambridge Analytica had a hand in Duterte’s 2016 campaign. In the recent May 2019 Philippine midterm election where Duterte's allies shut out opposition figures from the senate races, world governments, big tech, and foreign journalists kept high alert for the export potential of emerging disinformation innovations and the threat these represent for elections in global context. With its reputation as the "social media capital of the world" and having a large precariat digital workforce seeking entrepreneurial opportunities in the digital underground, the Philippines is fertile ground for disinformation experimentation with potentially global ramifications. This paper is based on a research intervention and public engagement effort to monitor disinformation innovations and interventions in the 2019 midterm elections. With partner researchers in the Philippines and overseas, we tracked disinformation as both emerging technological innovations and systematically constructed narratives that attempted to manipulate political discussion and deliberation.
  • Historical Revisionism: a Biblical Perspective Dan Olinger, Phd

    Historical Revisionism: a Biblical Perspective Dan Olinger, Phd

    white paper Historical Revisionism: A Biblical Perspective Dan Olinger, PhD Issues in Education WHITE PAPER Historical Revisionism: A Biblical Perspective Contents The Controversy 3 An Example 4 What Are We Fighting Over? 4 Bringing the Bible to Bear 5 Conclusion 5 WHITE PAPER Historical Revisionism: A Biblical Perspective Historical Revisionism: A Biblical Perspective In 1987 two best-selling books changed the way which blame has been assigned largely to changes Americans think about history. Allan Bloom’s The in the processes for publishing textbooks9—which Closing of the American Mind1 and E. D. Hirsch Jr.’s changes, it is often alleged, have resulted from the Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to industry’s attempt to keep up with unreasonable Know2 called the country’s attention to the fright- expectations of revision cycles.10 ening lack of historical understanding among its allegedly educated citizens.3 Soon numerous stud- But the problem of factual errors is not really at the ies, formal and informal, highlighted the problem.4 heart of the controversy behind textbook selection. Newspapers reported surveys that demonstrated Factual errors are a problem, of course, but compe- historical ignorance.5 Even Jay Leno made money tent editors, given appropriate time and resources, off the phenomenon.6 can find them and correct them. The real contro- versy in textbook selection is not over facts but over The Controversy the interpretation of those facts.11 How will the text- book view the events of history? What events and Not surprisingly, the years since 1987 have seen con- persons will it decide to include? What trends will stant battles over the history textbooks to be used it emphasize or de-emphasize? What sense of prog- 7 in America’s public schools.
  • The Holocaust and the Historical Revisionists

    The Holocaust and the Historical Revisionists

    The Holocaust and the Historical Revisionists Mark Silverberg Assistant Director, Jewish Community Council, Edmonton, Alberta To put it as plainly as possible, it is common knowledge that in times of acute social crisis, anti-Semitism takes to the streets. The corollary, however, appears to be that in times of acute ideological crisis, anti-Semitism takes to the intellectual presses. It is a sad reflection on our times. The Third Reich was to last for a postcard addressed to me at Boston Univer­ thousand years. In fact, it lasted for twelve sity. It said "I recently completed reading'The years and four months, specifically, from Hoax of the 20th Century,'and the professor January, 1933 until April, 1945. During who wrote the book claims that the six million is a total fiction, that no Jews were gassed or that time, more than twenty-nine million toasted in the ovens in German concentration persons were killed—six million of them camps, that there was nothing in German Jews, slaughtered because they were records to substantiate the Jewish claims, that Jewish. the confessions that were obtained, were ob­ The claim that the extermination of the tained under duress. I guess Hitler was right Jews at the hands of the Nazis was a greater when he said that the Jew is master of the Big tragedy than what has befallen other Lie . .2 persecuted people is both unfeeling and Wiesel continued by saying that he re­ heartless. It is, however, the uniqueness of ceived a second letter from a professor at their annihilation that is historically signi­ the Sorbonne.