Jimpress Issue 107 Spring 2016 Brook Street

23 Brook Street – Through Ben Valkhoff examines Jimi's actual tenure

February 10th saw the opening of the restored flat at 23 Brook Street in , advertised as "’s first home in the UK," the place where he lived during 1968 and 1969. But was this really Jimi’s home? And did he really live there for a period of two years, as the plaque on the front of the building suggests? High time for a closer look.

Until January 1968 Jimi Hendrix and his girlfriend had lived as a couple at manager ’s house in Upper Berkeley Street. Jimi and his management moved their operation permanently to the U.S. when The Jimi Hendrix Experience started touring in early February of that year, leaving Kathy behind in . When Chandler quit being Jimi’s manager at the end of the U.S. tour in the spring of 1968 following an argument, he returned to England for good and told Kathy to find herself and Jimi a new place to live.

Kathy: “Chas and Jimi had put me in this position and they would just have to pay. I had to have somewhere to live.”

For Jimi this would not have been a problem, because from then on he only visited the UK when work demanded it. Being accustomed to living in hotels, a permanent UK home was not necessary for Jimi. Besides, as one of the highest earning artists of his time, finding a temporary place to stay was not an issue for Jimi. For Kathy however, being evicted from the Upper Berkeley Street address meant looking desperately for other means of accommodation. Finally, in late June 1968 she found a flat in 23 Brook Street which was for rent at thirty pounds a week. Just in time, as Jimi arrived at London Heathrow Airport on July 4th.

Kathy: “Now that I had a roof over my head, the only problem was furniture. We didn’t even have a bed of our own at that stage, let alone carpets and curtains and all the other things that first-time homeowners suddenly find they have to acquire. I had never put my mind to buying furniture before and I wasn’t sure where to begin. It seemed like the sort of thing we should do as a couple, so when Jimi arrived back from America in July I booked us into the Londonderry Hotel in Park Lane for a couple of days and we set off to do a bit of shopping. We got a bed delivered and went to choose all the basics that we needed, which included turquoise velvet curtains and flame-coloured carpets - very unusual colours at the time. Jimi enjoyed choosing the colours and textures and discussing them with the sales staff. Other shoppers stopped and stared in amazement, not expecting to see Jimi Hendrix discussing patterns in the curtain department of John Lewis’s.”

The flat was only partly furnished and needed painting, so it seems unlikely that the couple stayed there for the first two weeks of July. There was not very much time for shopping anyway. Jimi played the Woburn Music Festival on the 6th, and was gone again on the 15th – eleven days later – this time to Mallorca. A whole group made the trip: 47 Jimpress Issue 107 Spring 2016

Jimi, Mitch, Noel, both roadies Gerry and Eric, and reporter Keith Altham. Whatever the reason, Kathy stayed in London, perhaps to get things fixed for the new flat. The travellers returned to London on the 19th of July.

All in all, Jimi spent 17 days in

Brook Street Brook London in July 1968. It is not known if he actually stayed at the Brook Street apartment during those days. The place needed decorating [see photo] and had no furniture so it seems unlikely that Jimi would have wanted to live in the flat under those conditions.

Jimi's [unknown] friend decorating the Brook Street flat, 1968. Photo: Tony Brown collection.

Kathy: “Jimi left me with £1,000 to pay for everything, which seemed like a fortune, while he went back to the States to resume his tour.”

Indeed, on the 25th of July – six days after he returned from Mallorca – Jimi left again for New York, only to return to London the following year.

With Jimi gone to America, Kathy set off to decorate the flat, under the impression that Jimi would at some point live there together with her as a couple. But Jimi had set up camp permanently in the U.S. and had no plans to move to England at all.

Kathy: “Angie and I decorated the flat together once Jimi had gone back to America. We bought a sofa from a second-hand shop and a table. We got in a decorator and hung all our pictures on the walls. We were like a couple of kids playing house. It was lovely. [...] We pinned Jimi’s Victorian shawl to the ceiling above the bed as a canopy and used a colourful Persian wall hanging as a bedspread. Jimi and I had bought black, red, and orange cotton sheets.”

Jimi spent the next four months touring the U.S. and recording. Finally, the Experience played their last concert of that year on the 1st of December in Chicago. One would have expected Jimi to rush off to London to get some rest at his new "home." But he had other plans. With no commitments for the rest of the month Jimi spent all of December relaxing and clubbing in New York. He even refused to fly out to the Netherlands to appear at a pop festival held on December 28th and 29th. Eventually he returned to London at the very last moment on the 2nd of January 1969, just two days before he had to appear on the BBC’s Lulu show. Whatever the reason, it seemed that Jimi was unsure if he was welcome in his new London home.

48 Jimpress Issue 107 Spring 2016 Brook Street

Trixie Sullivan (secretary of Michael Jeffery): “Jimi arrived and instead of going to the hotel he went to the flat as he says ‘to pick up some clothes’ but I think he wanted to see how the land was lying. It seems that Kathy cooked a meal for him, and I know she cleaned the flat so thoroughly just before he arrived, that he decided to stay” (Letter to Michael Jeffery, 10 January 1969). Note: this comment was left out of the Brook Street exhibition.

Jimi seemed okay with the arrangement. Kathy had done her best to make him a comfortable home and Jimi may have thought it was a better arrangement than staying in an impersonal hotel room. Even though Kathy created a warm environment for Jimi, he knew already by then it would not be permanent. Maybe Kathy knew this too, or avoided that thought. Or perhaps she was not let in on Jimi’s future schedule. Jimi would not have been able to stay as he had an upcoming U.S. tour in April, there were plans for new recording sessions, and he was involved in the construction of the newly bought in New York.

Kathy: “He was absolutely delighted with everything we had done. ‘This is my first real home of my own,’ he said, and I knew just how he felt. For two and a half months we revelled in having our own little place where Jimi could get off the roller coaster of fame and fortune and hide himself away.”

As it turned out those two and a half months were cut short by one month, with Jimi being abroad or busy elsewhere. Jimi arrived 2 January, but left again on the 8th to do a European tour. His homecoming on the 24th was a short one, as he left again on the 30th to New York for meetings with and architect John Storyk about the conversion of the Generation Club, returning to London on 12 February.

In fact there would be very little time left for the couple to ‘hide away’ and ‘revel’. Those 39 days (we counted them) which Jimi actually spent in London were packed with interviews, photo calls, filming sessions, a TV show, recording sessions, press parties, rehearsals, and jam sessions galore.

During an interview on January 6th with Don Short for the Daily Mirror, Jimi made his relationship with Kathy public. The article, as well as the photos taken the next day by Eric Harlow, paint a picture of a happy couple. However, while on tour in Europe the next two weeks, Jimi spent time with several other girls. No less than four days after the Mirror interview he met up with a Swedish girl named Eva Sundquist at his concert in Stockholm. That night the pair conceived their son James in room 405 of the Carlton Hotel. On top of that, – a girl Jimi had met in Düsseldorf – arrived in London on the 26th of February and put grit in the works by dating Jimi in March and claims that he slept at her hotel one night. To make matters even worse, he bought her rings and told people later that night at The Speakeasy club they were engaged. Clearly these were confusing times for all involved. 49 Jimpress Issue 107 Spring 2016

On the 12th of March Jimi moved out of the 23 Brook Street apartment, never to return there. The next day he flew from London to New York. Kathy followed him a

Brook Street Brook few days later, but soon returned to England. It marked the end of their relationship. Eventually Kathy got married to her first husband Ray in 1970 and moved out of the Brook Street apartment in July of that year.

CONCLUSION

Kathy: “He always had a tendency to tell people what they wanted to hear.”

Having only one main source of information for the Brook Street project, automatically raises a big question as to its reliability. The stories we get served are through the eyes of one person. How do we know Jimi said it was his first real home? Nowhere in contemporary press clippings can this claim be found.

The flat is being billed to the public as the "home" where he and his girlfriend lived for a long time in bliss, but the facts speak differently. Much (if not all) of the exhibition is being displayed with the approval of his former girlfriend. As a result all displeasing and embarrassing (but relevant) information is conveniently left out.

At best the flat was the place where Jimi stayed briefly in 1968 and 1969. If anything the whole Brook Street project is centered around Kathy Etchingham. She found it, rented it (the lease was in her name), decorated and furnished it, and lived in it for two years. It was also due to her long and determined campaign, that in 1997 the English Heritage unveiled a blue plaque on the front of the Brook Street building to commemorate Jimi’s link to the site.

Is it justified to present the Brook Street flat as Jimi’s home from 19681968----1969?1969?

No, because instead of the two years that is suggested by the plaque on the front of the building, Jimi only stayed there for a couple of weeks. If the people behind the project were honest the plaque should read: “Jimi Hendrix 1942-1970 Guitarist and stayed here briefly in 1968 and 1969”, but that doesn’t sell tickets.

50 Jimpress Issue 107 Spring 2016 Brook Street

Does Jimi’s stay at the Brook Street flat justify calling it his ""home?home?home?""""

No, because he stayed there only for a couple of weeks in total, too short a time to call it a home. If anything it was Kathy’s home were Jimi stayed as a guest while in London. Jimi never had a real home. Not in the U.K., nor in the U.S.A.

Jimi Hendrix: “I don’t like to stay in one place for a long time. The girls, you know. As long as I’m comfortable when I’m travelling, I guess I could do it all the time.”

Does the Brook Street flat deserve ttoo be the place to host an exhibition on Jimi?

Sure. He stayed there, even if it was for a very short time. Kathy and her friend Angie did a great job of decorating the flat with all the elements of what the abode of a rock star was supposed to look like: Persian rugs on the floor, Hendrix's favourite Victorian shawl above the bed, an acoustic guitar nearby, and a bottle of Mateus Rosé wine close at hand.

During those 39 days many interviews were done at the flat, photos taken, film shot. That, and the interior design contributed to the legendary status of the apartment. Of all the places Jimi stayed in the U.K. this flat is surely the most visually interesting.

Does the history of the flat justify a rere----creationcreation of the rooms as they were in 1969?

Yes, and no. Re-creating a room with replicas (only a mirror and a small table are original) will not appeal to the puritan fan. Some commented on Facebook:

“I'm not big on replicas, but with such a soft spot for Jimi, it's nice to imagine what it might have been like back in the day. Jimi's memory is getting packaged as if for display at an amusement park. It's quite disgusting actually. Their romance and nostalgia buttons will be pushed and they will be in an illusion they believe to be reality.”

“Almost all objects, furniture and furnishings are not original. They are not replicas of the originals, just things that have similar characteristics. My question is: what purpose does it have to go see the flat?”

To the general public it will surely be interesting to pay a visit and get an idea of what it looked like. Together with the exhibition – albeit 45 years too late – London finally has a permanent place of interest dedicated to its famous American visitor.

With thanks to Luigi Garuti and Cynthia Bickham Garcia.  51