DOCSLIB.ORG

INDONESIA INDONESIA: a Key Partner for the OECD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INDONESIA INDONESIA: a Key Partner for the OECD ACTIVE WITH INDONESIA INDONESIA: a key partner for the OECD Indonesia continues to be a strategic partner for the OECD, and it is important that we retain and intensify our engagement as the country’s role in the global economy increases. Indonesia was the eighth largest economy in the world in 2016, with a GDP of around USD 3.0 trillion at PPP, and it is expected to be the fourth largest economy by 2050, with a projected GDP of USD 10.5 trillion at PPP. As the largest country in Southeast Asia, one of the world’s fastest growing regions, Indonesia plays an increasingly important role in global trade. It is also one of the world’s largest democracies, with the impressive task of governing a population that is culturally, religiously and linguistically diverse across a vast territory. Its experience of reaching consensus in the face of this diversity can yield important insights for the international community. Since it became a Key Partner of our Organisation in 2007, Indonesia has actively contributed to addressing common policy challenges and has enriched policy debates at the OECD. Through this collaboration, we are also learning a lot from the great cultural richness and policy-making complexity of large developing countries. Today, Indonesia takes part in six bodies, 12 legal instruments and a wide array of OECD reviews and databases. It was the first Key Partner to sign a Framework of Co-operation Agreement in 2012, and a Privileges and Immunities Agreement in 2013. Such engagement with Indonesia has helped to drive our work in Southeast Asia. The launch of the Southeast Asia Regional Programme in 2014, together with the creation of a Jakarta representative office in 2015, are testament to this. Over the past two years, Indonesia has pursued an ambitious reform agenda. It has taken important steps to boost public revenue, invest in infrastructure, enhance sub-national government and reduce poverty and inequality. It has managed to maintain solid macroeconomic fundamentals, increase investment and establish free primary education. Going forward, progress in these areas will remain high on the development agenda. Connectivity continues to be a major development constraint, and policymakers will need to find ways to crowd more private finance into infrastructure investment. Measures to decrease malnutrition among school-age children will be important to reduce poverty and inequality. Human resource development, particularly more and better vocational education and training, will be key to engaging in higher-value added activities, including via FDI. Most economic development strategies will depend on the government’s success at boosting public finances, and these in turn will hinge on the success of current efforts to increase tax revenue and integrity within the public administration. The OECD stands ready to support Indonesia in these endeavours and in achieving economic growth that is both inclusive and sustainable. This “Active with Indonesia” brochure highlights how the OECD and Indonesia have worked together to advance the country’s reform agenda, and how Indonesia’s participation in OECD activities has enriched our work and helped us find solutions to global challenges. We look forward to deepening this collaboration and continuing to work with Indonesia as it advances better policies for better lives. ÁNGEL GURRÍA, OECD Secretary-General CONTENTS Contents THE OECD AND INDONESIA 2 EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 40 History of OECD-Indonesia co-operation 4 Achieving universal health coverage 41 The OECD-Indonesia Joint Work Programme 7 Promoting gender equality 42 The Southeast Asia Regional Programme 8 Fostering skills through education and training 44 The OECD Jakarta Office 11 Tackling inequality 46 SUSTAINABLE, BALANCED AND INCLUSIVE GROWTH 14 INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION 47 Maintaining economic growth and resilience 15 Building a knowledge economy 48 Supporting SME development 17 Harnessing digital technologies 49 Supporting green growth initiatives 18 Enhancing chemical safety 50 Promoting regional development and urbanisation 19 Biotechnology 50 Increasing agricultural productivity and food security 20 Boosting tourism 51 Promoting development co-operation and the 2030 Agenda 22 Better data for better policies 24 ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 52 Towards a cleaner and healthier environment 53 SMOOTH FUNCTIONING OF MARKETS 25 Combating climate change 54 Enhancing investment’s contribution to Biodiversity conservation and sustainable use 56 sustainable development 26 Strengthening global partnerships on clean energy Promoting trade and upgrading in global value chains 27 and energy efficiency 57 Promoting sound competition 29 Developing a robust financial system 30 ANNEXES 60 Strengthening connectivity, capital investment Overview of the OECD 60 and public-private partnerships 31 OECD legal instruments 62 Developing high-quality financial education 32 OECD bodies 63 Dialogue and data 63 PUBLIC AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 33 Implementing regulatory reform 34 Disseminating open government 35 Fighting transnational corruption 36 Towards a culture of integrity in Indonesia 37 Improving tax transparency and compliance 38 Raising the bar on corporate governance 39 CONTENTS . 1 THE OECD AND INDONESIA 2 . ACTIVE WITH INDONESIA THE OECD AND INDONESIA AND OECD THE HOW WE WORK TOGETHER THE OECD AND INDONESIA . 3 THE OECD AND INDONESIA An ever-growing partnership The OECD’s engagement with Indonesia has deepened Milestones in OECD-Indonesia collaboration include the significantly since 2007, when the country became one of the country’s decision to become a member of the OECD organisation’s five Key Partners. It was the first Key Partner Development Centre in 2009 and to join the OECD’s to sign both a Framework of Co-operation Agreement (2012) Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related and a Privileges and Immunity Agreement (2013) with the Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Organisation, and Indonesian ministers have regularly (BEPS) in 2017. Both signal Indonesia’s willingness to attended and substantively contributed to the OECD’s align more closely with OECD countries and to engage Ministerial Council Meetings since 2012. The establishment with them in a spirit of mutual learning. In this vein, of the OECD’s first Southeast Asian office in Jakarta in March Indonesia also adheres to 12 OECD legal instruments 2015 marked a further intensification of this relationship, and participates in nine OECD bodies as an Associate or with the office supporting the Organisation’s engagement Participant. The country is also integrated into a number with Indonesia and Southeast Asia, as well as a number of of flagship OECD publications as well as statistical regional organisations. databases. HIGHLIGHTS 2007 2009 2010 2012 2013 2014 Indonesia becomes Indonesia becomes OECD launches its first Indonesia becomes Indonesia becomes The OECD launches one of five Key the 34th member of the full Economic Survey the first Key Partner the first Key Partner to its Southeast Asia Partners of the OECD OECD’s Development of Indonesia to sign a Framework sign a Privileges and Regional Programme, through its Enhanced Centre and concludes of Co-operation Immunities Agreement with Indonesia as its Engagement a “statement of co- Agreement with the with the OECD Co-Chair Programme operation” with the OECD OECD’s Investment Committee 4 . ACTIVE WITH INDONESIA THE OECD AND INDONESIA AND OECD THE THE OECD AND INDONESIA An ever-growing partnership L The President of Indonesia, H.E. Mr Joko Widodo, and OECD Secretary-General, Angel Gurría during a visit to launch the 2017-18 OECD-Indonesia Joint Work Programme and the OECD Economic Survey of 2015 2016 2017 2017 2018 Indonesia in Jakarta, 2016. Minister of President of Indonesia Renewal of the Indonesia signs Minister of National Finance Bambang Joko Widodo and Framework of the OECD MLI on Development Brodjonegoro and the OECD Secretary Cooperation BEPS along with 71 Planning Bambang OECD Secretary General launch Agreement for a countries at the 2017 Brodjonegoro attends General Angel Gurria the second OECD- period of 5 years by OECD Ministerial the OECD MCM in inaugurate an OECD Indonesia JWP for Minister of Finance Council Meeting 2018 office in Jakarta 2017-2018, and the Sri Mulyani Indrawati (MCM) in Paris 2016 OECD Economic and OECD Secretary Survey of Indonesia General Angel Gurria THE OECD AND INDONESIA . 5 6 . ACTIVE WITH INDONESIA THE OECD AND INDONESIA AND OECD THE The OECD-Indonesia Joint Work Programme: A path for more structured co-operation OECD engagement with Indonesia is based on a Framework l ENVIRONMENT: The Green Growth Policy Review of Indonesia of Co-operation Agreement that was first signed in 2012 was initiated, which seeks to assess the extent to which and renewed in 2017 by the OECD Secretary General Angel Indonesia is mainstreaming environmental considerations Gurría and Minister of Finance of Indonesia, Sri Mulyani into its economic policy. A GGPR workshop was held in Jakarta Indrawati. It is structured around a Joint Work Programme in November 2017, which included a special session on the (JWP), which traditionally ran for two years but will run for OECD report Investing in Climate, Investing in Growth. three years starting from 2019. The JWP is developed in close consultation with key policy stakeholders in Indonesia as l SME POLICIES: An SME and Entrepreneurship Policy Review well as substantive OECD directorates, and is based on the of Indonesia was developed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • July 15, 2020 Ambassador Robert E. Lighthizer U.S. Trade
    July 15, 2020 Ambassador Robert E. Lighthizer U.S. Trade Representative 600 17th St. NW Washington, DC 20508 Re: Docket No. USTR-2020-0022: Initiation of Section 301 Investigations of Digital Services Taxes Dear Ambassador Lighthizer: The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) welcomes the U.S. Administration’s recognition that digital services taxes (DSTs) that have been adopted or are under consideration in ten jurisdictions – Austria, Brazil, the Czech Republic, the European Union (EU), India, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom (UK) – raise concerns under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. These unilateral measures advance a troubling precedent, unnecessarily depart from progress toward stable and sustainable international tax policies, and will disproportionately impact U.S.-headquartered companies. In accordance with the notice and request for comments published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on June 5, 2020, ITI respectfully submits the following written comments on the Administration’s initiation of Section 301 investigations of these ten measures.1 In our comments, we provide USTR with evidence to support a determination that these new DSTs – like the French DST – are unfair trade practices under Section 301 because they are discriminatory, unreasonable, inconsistent with prevailing international tax principles, and unusually burdensome for affected U.S. companies. Notably, many of the DSTs are structured similarly to the French DST and share the same problematic features that USTR identified in its Report on France’s Digital Services Tax (French DST Report),2 including scope limitations and revenue thresholds that are meant to target U.S. companies and shield domestic companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare in Transition
    Welfare in Transition The Political Economy of Social Protection Reform in Indonesia Maryke van Diermen Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts University of Adelaide December 2017 Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint award of this degree. I give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Signature of candidate: Date: 10/07/18 ii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support I have received from many people. I am thankful to them all but I wish to mention some in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Content-Handbook-Of-Energy-And
    Team Handbook Steering Committee Agus Cahyono Adi (Head of Center for Data and Information Technology) Farida Lasnawatin (Head of Data Management Division) Coordinators Anton Budi Prananto (Head of Energy Data Management Subdivision) Vony Mela Suzanti (Head of Mineral Data Management Subdivision) Technical Committee Imam Gagas Anutomo (Statistician and PIC of Electricity Data) Dini Anggreani (Statistician and PIC of NRE Data) Muhammad Yusuf (PIC of Oil Data) Linda Ambarsari (PIC of Gas Data) Herlina Yuanningrat (PIC of Mineral and Coal Data) 2019 Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia Preface The update on the Handbook of Energy & Economy Statistics of Indonesia, is an effort of the Center for Data and Information Technology on Energy Mineral Resources (CDI-EMR) to provide accurate and reliable data and information on energy and economy joined into a book. Such energy and economic data and information are kept by various sources, at many locations, and generally in avariety of formats unready for energy analysis. In addition, the data and information are generally not provided with sufficient explanation or clarification. The standardization of energy and economic data is a critical problem. Currently, researchers at various institutions, do not have common terminology on energy economy. In some cases, disagreement may arise over a different use of terminology. This subsequently leads to inaccurate energy analysis. The Current problem related to energy data in Indonesia is the unavailability of demand-side data. To date, energy data are actually derived from supply-side data. In other words, consumption data are assumed to be identical with sales data. Such assumption maybe quite accurate, provided there is no disparity between domestic and international energy prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Woodfuel Survey Module for Incorporation Into Existing Household Surveys and Censuses in Developing Countries
    Technical Report Series GO-18-2017 Developing a Woodfuel Survey Module for Incorporation into Existing Household Surveys and Censuses in Developing Countries Review of National Surveys and Censuses that Could Incorporate a Woodfuel Supplementary Module Publication prepared in the framework of the Global Strategy to improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics February 2017 Developing a Woodfuel Survey Module for Incorporation into Existing Household Surveys and Censuses in Developing Countries Review of National Surveys and Censuses that Could Incorporate a Woodfuel Supplementary Module Drafted by Andrea Borlizzi Consultant, Forest Products and Statistics Team FOAPD Division, Forestry Department FAO, Rome Recommended citation: Borlizzi, A. 2017. Review of national surveys and censuses that could incorporate a woodfuel supplementary module. Technical Report No. 18. Global Strategy Technical Report: Rome. Table of Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................ 5 Acronyms and Abbreviations................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction........................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Background.................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Purpose and scope of this technical report................................................... 9 2. Surveys and censuses that could incorporate a WSM; review of
    [Show full text]
  • New Considerations on the Sino-European Relations
    NNEWEW CONSIDERATIONSCONSIDERATIONS ONON THETHE SINO-EUROPEANSINO-EUROPEAN RELATIONS,RELATIONS, FFROMROM THETHE PERSPECTIVEPERSPECTIVE OFOF THETHE GLOBALGLOBAL BALANCEBALANCE OFOF POWER.POWER. TTHEHE MIRAGEMIRAGE OFOF THETHE SILKSILK ROADROAD „ASIA MATTERS – FOR EUROPE. AND EUROPE MATTERS – FOR ASIA” Joint declarati on of the former European Union leaders, Herman Van Rompuy and José Manuel Barroso 16 October 2014 Keywords: International system – diplomacy – foreign policy – China – European Union – USA – Russia – strategic partnership – European affairs – Eurasia – the Asia-Pacifi c area ► The world today is a mess, there is no doubt about it. But probably this is also how the contemporaries of other historical ti mes saw their present. We could rather say that the internati onal order is diffi cult to predict at the beginning of a century which is already dominated by very confusing moves and combinati ons. Using the author’s own means of research and observati on (fi eld research, the percepti on of reality from the perspecti ve of the study of history, and a compared dimension), this arti cle wishes to shed some light on a part of the role played by the European Union in the internati onal policy under the circumstances of the fast transformati ons suff ered by the global economic and security environment. The strategic relati on with China is worth discussing at several levels (depending on the various categories of interests); our considerati ons about the course of the strategic partnership between the two powers and about the current evoluti ons of the internati onal scene try to provide only some necessary benchmarks for an overall understanding of this diplomati c closeness.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicts Between State and Business in the Nationalization of PT. Inalum
    International Conference on Social and Political Issues (ICSPI 2016) International Conference on Social and Political Issues (the 1st ICSPI, 2016) “Knowledge and Social Transformation” Volume 2018 Conference Paper Conflicts Between State and Business in the Nationalization of PT. Inalum Alim Bathoro Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia Abstract This study discusses the dispute between state and capitalist class. State consists of local government elite and central government elite. Local elite consists of 10 regents/mayors in Lake Toba region and Asahan River basin, while the central elite are President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Coordinating Minister for the Economy Hatta Rajasa, Minister of State-Owned Enterprises Dahlan Iskan, Minister of Industry MS Hidayat as well as Leaders and Members of Commissions VI & IX of the House of Representatives Republic of Indonesia. Meanwhile the capitalist class is represented by Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan and Association for Mineral Entrepreneur Indonesia Received: 19 March 2018 (APEMINDO). This research aims to clarify underlying factors of dispute between state Accepted: 27 July 2018 and capitalist class in the nationalization of PT. Indonesian Asahan Aluminum (Inalum) Published: 29 August 2018 which implies to conflict among elites. Publishing services provided by This study uses qualitative method by analyzing research findings with the Theory Knowledge E of State Autonomy proposed by Ralp Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas as the main Alim Bathoro. This article is perspective. While the theory of conflict and consensus by Maswadi Rauf, authority distributed under the terms of of elite theory by C. Wright Mills, theory of decentralization by Vedi R. Hadiz, theory of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which oligarch’s power by Jeffrey A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Mulyani Indrawati, S.E., M.Sc., Ph.D
    Image not found or type unknown Sri Mulyani Indrawati, S.E., M.Sc., Ph.D Plt. Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian RI Sri Mulyani Indrawati lahir di Bandar Lampung, Lampung, pada tanggal 26 Agustus 1962. Ia adalah wanita sekaligus orang Indonesia pertama yang menjabat sebagai Direktur Pelaksana Bank Dunia. Jabatan ini diembannya mulai 1 Juni 2010. Sebelumnya, dia menjabat Menteri Keuangan, Kabinet Indonesia Bersatu. Ketika ia menjadi Direktur Pelaksana Bank Dunia, maka ia pun meninggalkan jabatannya sebagai Menteri Keuangan. Sebelum menjadi Menteri Keuangan, Ia menjabat sebagai Menteri Negara Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas dari Kabinet Indonesia Bersatu. Sri Mulyani sebelumnya dikenal sebagai seorang pengamat ekonomi di Indonesia. Ia menjabat sebagai Kepala Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan Masyarakat Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia (LPEM FEUI) sejak Juni 1998. Pada 5 Desember 2005, ketika Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono mengumumkan perombakan kabinet, Sri Mulyani dipindahkan menjadi Menteri Keuangan menggantikan Jusuf Anwar. Sejak tahun 2008, ia menjabat Pelaksana Tugas Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian, setelah Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Boediono dilantik sebagai Gubernur Bank Indonesia. Ia dinobatkan sebagai Menteri Keuangan terbaik Asia untuk tahun 2006 oleh Emerging Markets pada 18 September 2006 di sela Sidang Tahunan Bank Dunia dan IMF di Singapura. Ia juga terpilih sebagai wanita paling berpengaruh ke-23 di dunia versi majalah Forbes tahun 2008 dan wanita paling berpengaruh ke-2 di Indonesia
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Aceh, Indonesia Patrick Barron Erman Rahmant Kharisma Nugroho
    THE CONTESTED CORNERS OF ASIA Subnational Conflict and International Development Assistance The Case of Aceh, Indonesia Patrick Barron Erman Rahmant Kharisma Nugroho The Contested Corners of Asia: Subnational Con!ict and International Development Assistance The Case of Aceh, Indonesia Patrick Barron, Erman Rahman, Kharisma Nugroho Authors : Patrick Barron, Erman Rahman, Kharisma Nugroho Research Team Saifuddin Bantasyam, Nat Colletta, (in alphabetical order): Darnifawan, Chairul Fahmi, Sandra Hamid, Ainul Huda, Julianto, Mahfud, Masrizal, Ben Oppenheim, Thomas Parks, Megan Ryan, Sulaiman Tripa, Hak-Kwong Yip World Bank counterparts ; Adrian Morel, Sonja Litz, Sana Jaffrey, Ingo Wiederhofer Perceptions Survey Partner ; Polling Centre Supporting team : Ann Bishop (editor), Landry Dunand (layout), Noni Huriati, Sylviana Sianipar Special thanks to ; Wasi Abbas, Matt Zurstrassen, Harry Masyrafah Lead Expert : Nat Colletta Project Manager : Thomas Parks Research Specialist and Perception Survey Lead : Ben Oppenheim Research Methodologist : Yip Hak Kwang Specialist in ODA to Con!ict Areas : Anthea Mulakala Advisory Panel (in alphabetical order) : Judith Dunbar, James Fearon, Nils Gilman, Bruce Jones, Anthony LaViña, Neil Levine, Stephan Massing, James Putzel, Rizal Sukma, Tom Wing!eld This study has been co-!nanced by the State and Peacebuilding Fund (SPF) of the World Bank. The !ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank and its af!liated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Additional funding for this study was provided by UK Aid from the UK Government. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of The Asia Foundation or the funders.
    [Show full text]
  • 8-11 July 2021 Venice - Italy
    3RD G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS MEETING AND SIDE EVENTS 8-11 July 2021 Venice - Italy 1 CONTENTS 1 ABOUT THE G20 Pag. 3 2 ITALIAN G20 PRESIDENCY Pag. 4 3 2021 G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS MEETINGS Pag. 4 4 3RD G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS MEETING Pag. 6 Agenda Participants 5 MEDIA Pag. 13 Accreditation Media opportunities Media centre - Map - Operating hours - Facilities and services - Media liaison officers - Information technology - Interview rooms - Host broadcaster and photographer - Venue access Host city: Venice Reach and move in Venice - Airport - Trains - Public transports - Taxi Accomodation Climate & time zone Accessibility, special requirements and emergency phone numbers 6 COVID-19 PROCEDURE Pag. 26 7 CONTACTS Pag. 26 2 1 ABOUT THE G20 Population Economy Trade 60% of the world population 80 of global GDP 75% of global exports The G20 is the international forum How the G20 works that brings together the world’s major The G20 does not have a permanent economies. Its members account for more secretariat: its agenda and activities are than 80% of world GDP, 75% of global trade established by the rotating Presidencies, in and 60% of the population of the planet. cooperation with the membership. The forum has met every year since 1999 A “Troika”, represented by the country that and includes, since 2008, a yearly Summit, holds the Presidency, its predecessor and with the participation of the respective its successor, works to ensure continuity Heads of State and Government. within the G20. The Troika countries are currently Saudi Arabia, Italy and Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Local Governments in Increasing the Human Development Index As a Barometer in Achieving Sdgs in Boalemo District
    p-ISSN : 2685-9106 ​ e-ISSN : 2686-0384 ADI International Conference Series The Role of Local Governments in Increasing the Human Development Index as a Barometer in Achieving SDGs in Boalemo District 1 2 Heldy Vanni Alam ,​ Mahludin H. Baruwadi ​ ​ 1 2 {[email protected] ,​ [email protected] }​ ​ ​ ​ ​ The State University of Gorontalo, Gorontalo and Indonesia1,2 ​ To cite this document : Abstract This study aims to: 1) determine the trend of the Human Development Index in Boalemo District and 2) describe the role of local governments in increasing the Human Development Index as a barometer in achieving SDGs. The research method used was a survey with secondary data obtained through various supporting documents available at the Statistics Indonesia and related Service Apparatus Organizations in time series and cross-sections. Data were then processed using descriptive analysis. The results showed that: 1) The Human Development Index in Boalemo District tends to increase from year to year and 2) Local government plays a vital role in developing human resources through education and health, which is implemented starting from the process of planning, organizing, implementing, to evaluating the program. Besides, the government's role is manifested in a commitment to support sustainable budgeting to increase the HDI SDGs optimally. Keywords: Human Development in Boalemo District. The Role of Local Governments … 817 p-ISSN : 2685-9106 ​ e-ISSN : 2686-0384 ADI International Conference Series I. INTRODUCTION & RESEARCH PROBLEM Development is a continuous process of improving people's welfare. Since 2015, all development at the global level has been referred to as sustainable development goals or better known as sustainable development goals (SDGs).
    [Show full text]
  • Content-Handbook-Of-Energy-And
    Team Handbook Steering Committee Agus Cahyono Adi (Head of Center for Data and Information Technology) Farida Lasnawatin (Coordinator of Data Management Division) Coordinators Anton Budi Prananto (Sub-Coordinator of Energy Data Management Subdivision) Lukfi Halim (Sub-Coordinator of Mineral Data Management Subdivision) Technical Committee Imam Gagas Anutomo (Statistician and PIC of Electricity Data) Dini Anggreani (Statistician and PIC of NRE Data) Fifi Indarwati (Senior Researcher of APERC) Muhammad Yusuf (PIC of Oil Data) Linda Ambarsari (PIC of Gas Data) Herlina Yuanningrat (PIC of Mineral and Coal Data) Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia 2 0 2 0 Preface The update on the Handbook of Energy & Economy Statistics of Indonesia, is an effort of the Center for Data and Information Technology on Energy Mineral Resources (CDI-EMR) to provide accurate and reliable data and information on energy and economy joined into a book. Such energy and economic data and information are kept by various sources, at many locations, and generally in avariety of formats unready for energy analysis. In addition, the data and information are generally not provided with sufficient explanation or clarification. The standardization of energy and economic data is a critical problem. Currently, researchers at various institutions, do not have common terminology on energy economy. In some cases, disagreement may arise over a different use of terminology. This subsequently leads to inaccurate energy analysis. The Current problem related to energy data in Indonesia is the unavailability of demand-side data. To date, energy data are actually derived from supply-side data. In other words, consumption data are assumed to be identical with sales data.
    [Show full text]
  • Akhmad Rizal Shidiq
    3963 Persimmon Drive, Apt 103 Fairfax, VA 22031 Tel: +1 (571) 282-5387 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://scholar.harvard.edu/rizalshidiq/ Akhmad Rizal Shidiq Research Economist by training and currently working on Ph.D dissertation on financial crisis, Interest credit market, firms, and political connections in Indonesia. Primary fields are monetary theory and public choice. Extensive research experience especially in development mi- croeconomics, political economy, and trade. Conducted field researches and large-survey analysis in Indonesia, with substantial experience in working with government and inter- national agencies. Taught intermediate micro and macroeconomics for undergraduate. Education George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia USA Ph.D., Economics (expected Spring 2015) Dissertation Topic: \Essays on Firms and Political Connections in Indonesia" SOAS, University of London, UK M.Sc., Development Economics 2002 University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia Sarjana (B.A.), Economics 1999 Academic Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Massachusetts USA Experience Research Fellow 2011 - 2013 Pre-doctoral research fellowship George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia USA Graduate Lecturer 2010 Intermediate Macroeconomics for undergraduate Department of Economics, University of Indonesia, Jakarta Indonesia Lecturer 2006-2007 Indonesian Economic Policy and Poverty, Income Distribution, and Public Policy courses in Master of Public Policy Program Lecturer 2002-2007 Intermediate Micro and Macroeconomics for undergraduate Teaching
    [Show full text]