DOCSLIB.ORG

Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment ORIGINAL REPORT Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of Residential Lots Proposed on Part of Lots 2, 3, & 4, Concession 9 Part of Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 Concession 8 Geographic Township of Radcliffe Township of Madawaska Valley County of Renfrew in northcentral Ontario. Report Author: Dave Norris Woodland Heritage Northwest 134 College St. Thunder Bay, ON P7A 5J5 p: (807) 632-9893 e: [email protected] Project Information Location: Lot 2 and 3 CON 8 and Lots 2 and 3 CON 9 of the Township of Madawaska Valley PIF P307-0077-2017 Proponent Information: Mr. Neil Enright National Fur Farms Inc. 118 Annie Mayhew Road Combermere, Ontario K0J 1L0 Tel: (480) 363-6558 E-Mail: [email protected] Report Completed: September 13, 2017 Report Submitted: October 1, 2017 Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of Lots 2 and 3 CON8, Lots 2 and 3 CON 9 in the Township of Madawaska Valley, Township of Renfrew i © 2017 Woodland Heritage Northwest. All rights reserved. Executive Summary National Fur Farms Inc. in Combermere, Ontario contracted Woodland Heritage Services to conduct a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of their property located on Part of Lots 2, 3 and 4 CON 9 and Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 CON 8 of the Township of Madawaska Valley, in the county of Renfrew in northcentral Ontario. The proponent is planning on subdividing the property into 60 residential lots. The archaeological assessment was undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990), the Planning Act, and the Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists (2011). All archaeological consulting activities were performed under the Professional Archaeological Licence of Dave Norris (P307). The Subject property is situated in the Canadian Shield (Section 1.3.3, Standard 1). This project involves the purchase of land whereby previous activities on the subject property include seasonal camping and RV park in lots 2 and 3 on CON 9 and a private airstrip located in the southern portion on lots 2 and 3 CON 8. The property is bordered by the Madawaska River to the immediate south and includes shorelines associated with Green Lake to the north. There is approximately 230 m of beach located on the southwestern portion of the subject property that was utilized by the commercial camp and the area is dotted by various accommodations such as cottages, RV and tenting camp spaces and Pod “Glamping” structures which consist of a wooden frame that include a bed and indoor living space. Proposed changes include the development of cottages along the river area for more permanent living. A previous Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (P307-0070-2017) determined that several areas of the proposed development exhibited archaeological potential and thus recommendations for Stage 2 were required. Following Stage 2 investigations for this assessment (P307-0077-2017) a find spot was discovered however, subsequent testing in the surrounding area did not result in any further archaeological materials being recovered. The area has no further cultural heritage value. Physical inspection was carried out upon the remaining portion of the proposed development with no archaeological potential observed. Recommendations for further assessment are as follows: • Part of Lots 2, 3, & 4, Concession 9 Part of Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 Concession 8 Geographic Township of Radcliffe Township of Madawaska Valley County of Renfrew hold no further cultural heritage value and therefore no further archaeological investigations are recommended. Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of Lots 2 and 3 CON8, Lots 2 and 3 CON 9 in the Township of Madawaska Valley, Township of Renfrew ii © 2017 Woodland Heritage Northwest. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... ii • Part of Lots 2, 3, & 4, Concession 9 Part of Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 Concession 8 Geographic Township of Radcliffe Township of Madawaska Valley County of Renfrew hold no further cultural heritage value and therefore no further archaeological investigations are recommended. ...................................................................................................................... ii Maps .................................................................................................................................... iv Photographs of Survey Area ................................................................................................. iv Project Personnel .................................................................................................................vii 1.0 Project Context ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Development Context ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Historical Context ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 Historical Documentation ....................................................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Pre-Contact Period ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Archaeological Context ................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.1 Current Conditions ................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.2 Physiography ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.3 Previous Archaeological Assessments ..................................................................................... 7 1.4.4 Registered Archeological Sites ................................................................................................ 7 1.4.5 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 8 2.0 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Physical Inspection........................................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Shovel Testing .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.0 Records of Finds............................................................................................................. 10 4.0 Analysis and Conclusions ............................................................................................... 10 5.0 Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 11 Part of Lots 2, 3, & 4, Concession 9 Part of Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 Concession 8 Geographic Township of Radcliffe Township of Madawaska Valley County of Renfrew hold no further cultural heritage value and therefore no further archaeological investigations are recommended. ... 11 6.0 Advice on Compliance with Legislation ........................................................................... 11 7.0 Bibliography and References .......................................................................................... 13 8.0 Maps ............................................................................................................................. 16 9.0 Photographs .................................................................................................................. 20 Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of Lots 2 and 3 CON8, Lots 2 and 3 CON 9 in the Township of Madawaska Valley, Township of Renfrew iii © 2017 Woodland Heritage Northwest. All rights reserved. Maps Map 1. General Location of proposed development in northcentral Ontario (from P307-0073- 2017). .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Map 2. Close-up satellite imagery (Bing Maps) of proposed development area (from P307- 0073-2017).................................................................................................................................. 16 Map 3. Location of proposed development area (from P307-0073-2017). ................................ 17 Map 4. Recommended areas of testing from the Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (P307- 0073-2017).................................................................................................................................. 17 Map 5. Results of areas inspected via pedestrian and test pit survey for this archaeological assessment. ................................................................................................................................ 18 Map 6. Map of observed disturbance, water and undisturbed areas in the study area........... 18 Map 7. Location and direction of photographs in this report. ..................................................... 19 Map 8. Proposed development map for the 52 lots for the proposed development. .............. 19 Photographs of Survey Area Photo 1. In northern portion of property along
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Evolving Muskoka Vacation Experience 1860-1945 by Geoffrey
    The Evolving Muskoka Vacation Experience 1860-1945 by Geoffrey Shifflett A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © Geoffrey Shifflett 2012 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation examines the development of tourism in Muskoka in the Canadian Shield region from 1860 to 1945. Three key themes are examined: the tourists, the resorts and projected image of the area. When taken together, they provide insight into the origin and evolution of the meanings attached to tourist destinations in the Canadian Shield. The Muskoka Lakes region provides the venue in which continuity and change in each of these elements of the tourism landscape are explored. This dissertation uses previously underutilized primary source materials ranging from hotel ledgers, financial reports, personal correspondence, period brochures, guidebooks, and contemporary newspaper articles to reconstruct the Muskoka tourist experience over an extended period of time. The volume of literature pertaining to American tourism history significantly outweighs similar work conducted on Canadian destinations. This dissertation, therefore, begins with an overview of key works related to the historical development of tourism in the United States followed by a survey of corresponding Canadian literature. The lack of an analytical structure in many tourist historical works is identified as a methodological gap in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mapping of Samuel De Champlain, 1603–1635 Conrad E
    51 • The Mapping of Samuel de Champlain, 1603–1635 Conrad E. Heidenreich The cartography of Samuel de Champlain marks the be- roster of 1595 he was listed as a fourier (sergeant) and aide ginning of the detailed mapping of the Atlantic coast north to the maréchal de logis (quartermaster), apparently of Nantucket Sound, into the St. Lawrence River valley, reaching the rank of maréchal himself.4 The same pay ros- and, in a more cursory fashion, to the eastern Great Lakes. ter states that in 1595 he went on a secret mission for the Previous maps were based on rapid ship-board reconnais- king that was regarded to be of some importance. He also sance surveys made in the early to middle sixteenth cen- made a “special report” to Henri IV after his West Indian tury, particularly on the expeditions of Jacques Cartier and voyage (1601) and after the first two voyages to Canada Jean-François de La Rocque, sieur de Roberval (1534 – (1603 and 1607). These reports seem to indicate that 43). These maps conveyed little more than the presence of Champlain had a personal relationship with Henri IV, a stylized coastline. The immediate result of the Cartier- probably accounting for the pension the king awarded him Roberval expeditions was that France lost interest in sometime before 1603.5 After the war, Champlain joined North America, except for fishing off the northeast coast. his uncle’s ship, the 500-tun Saint-Julien, in Spanish The indigenous population was considered impoverished Caribbean service.6 In June 1601, Champlain was in and hostile, there were no quick riches, and the winters Cádiz where he was a witness to his dying uncle’s testa- were so brutal that the French wondered whether Euro- ment leaving him a large estate near La Rochelle as well as peans could live there.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Award Winners 1
    THE GRAND STRATEGY NEWSLETTER Volume 11, Number 2 - March/April 2006 Grand River The Grand: Conservation A Canadian Authority Heritage River Features Watershed Award winners 1 Milestones Workshop addresses value of heritage 4 What's Happening Program aims to conserve natural areas 5 Brantford-Brant water Watershed Award winners festival new this year 5 ach year the Grand River Conservation This article, adapted from the script for the EAuthority recognizes the efforts of individu- show, highlights four winners of Watershed Now available als and groups by presenting awards for out- Awards. The other winners were featured in the standing examples of conservation and environ- previous edition of Grand Actions. Shunpiking in mental work. Waterloo Region 6 For 2005, the winner of the Honour Roll Hillside Festival, Guelph Award is S.C. Johnson and Son Ltd. of Brantford. Look Who’s The winners of the Watershed Awards are Hillside Festival has grown over the past 21 Taking Action Waterloo Region District School Board and years from a small, 11-hour festival to a three day event attracting 5,000 people a day. County of Brant Waterloo Catholic District School Board; It’s on the island at Guelph Lake Conservation preserves bridge 7 Greentec International Inc., Cambridge; Wilfrid Laurier/Mohawk Environmental Group, Area when the island’s quiet tranquility is trans- formed into a hub of activity. Sold out for the Grand Strategy Brantford; Hillside Festival, Guelph; John first time in 2005, it featured 45 bands. Calendar 8 Jackson of Kitchener, founder of the Great Lakes United; Vlad Jelinek, Rosewood Farm, Grand Music brings in the crowd, but Hillside is Cover photo Valley; and Arnold VerVoort and Family farm, much more than music.
    [Show full text]
  • GWTA 2019 Overview and Participant Survey Monday, August 26, 2019
    GWTA 2019 Overview and Participant Survey Monday, August 26, 2019 Powered by Cycle the North! GWTA 2019-July 28 to August 2 450km from Sault Ste. Marie to Sudbury launching the Lake Huron North Channel Expansion of the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail and Great Trail. Overnight Host Communities: Sault Ste. Marie, Bruce Mines, Blind River, Espanola, Sudbury Rest Stop Hosts: Garden River First Nation, Macdonald Meredith and Aberdeen Additional (Echo Bay), Johnson Township (Desbarats), Township of St. Joseph, Thessalon, Huron Shores (Iron Bridge), Mississauga First Nation, North Shore Township (AlgoMa Mills), Serpent River First Nation, Spanish, Township of Spanish-Sables (Massey), Nairn Centre. 150 participants aged 23 to 81 coming from Florida, Massasschutes, Minnesota, New Jersey, Arizona, and 5 provinces: Ontario (91%), British ColuMbia, Alberta, Quebec and New Brunswick. 54 elected representatives and community leaders met GWTA Honorary Tour Directors and participants at rest stops and in soMe cases cycled with the group. See pages 24-26 for list. Special thanks to our awesome support team: cycling and driving volunteers, caMp teaM, Mary Lynn Duguay of the Township of North Shore for serving as our lead vehicle and Michael Wozny for vehicle support. Great regional and local Media coverage. 2 The Route—Lake Huron North Channel Expansion—450 km from Gros Cap to Sudbury Gichi-nibiinsing-zaaga’igan Ininwewi-gichigami Waaseyaagami-wiikwed Naadowewi-gichigami Zhooniyaang-zaaga’igan Gichigami-zitbi Niigani-gichigami Waawiyaataan Waabishkiigoo-gichigami • 3000 km, signed route The Lake Huron North Channel celebrates the spirit of the North, following 12 heritage• 3 rivers,Great Lakes,connecting 5 bi- nationalwith 11 northern rivers lakes, • 140 communities and First Nations winding through forests, AMish and Mennonite farmland, historic logging, Mining and• fishing3 UNESCO villages, Biospheres, and 24 beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools
    District School Board Ontario North East Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools A Guide for Staff District School Board Ontario North East Revised 2014 Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools ii District School Board Ontario North East Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ vi Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... vii Supporting Aboriginal Students in DSB Ontario North East ............................................................. 1 First Nations Trustee ....................................................................................................................... 1 First Nations Advisory Committee ................................................................................................. 1 Voluntary Self-Identification .......................................................................................................... 1 Aboriginal Youth Liaison Officers ................................................................................................. 2 Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools ................................................................................................... 3 Ensuring Success for Schools ............................................................................................................. 3 Terminology .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10Th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9
    ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-586-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Fax: 416-586-3485 TTY: 1-866-411-4211 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca @Ont_Ombudsman Ontario Ombudsman OntarioOmbudsman OntOmbuds ISSN 1708-0851 ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG June 2020 Hon. Ted Arnott, Speaker Legislative Assembly Province of Ontario Queen’s Park Dear Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to submit my Annual Report for the period of April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020, pursuant to section 11 of the Ombudsman Act, so that you may table it before the Legislative Assembly. Sincerely, Paul Dubé Ombudsman Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-583-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report 1 2 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report YEAR IN REVIEW • TEXT TABLE OF CONTENTS OMBUDSMAN’S MESSAGE .........................................................................................................5 2019-2020 AT A GLANCE ............................................................................................................8 ABOUT OUR OFFICE .................................................................................................................10 HOW WE WORK .........................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Tobique First Nation, NB June 2009
    Tobique First Nation, NB June 2009 Wulustuk Times Wulustuk - Indigenous name for St John River This publication produced monthly at Tobique, NB, Canada E7H 5K3 TABLE OF CONTENTS, JUNE 2009 MOSSOS AND CARIBOU TOBIQUE FOREST WATCH BEGUN IN 2004 CONTINUES TODAY UNDER NEW FORMAT PARLIAMENT AIMS TO FINALIZE LEGAL DEFINITION OF “ INDIAN” WITHIN TEN MONTHS MARTIN SAYS HARPER POLICY AIMS TO ‘ASSIMILATE’ NATIVES KICHESIPIRINI ALGONQUIN FN NOW A NON-ADMINISTERING STATE NGO AT U.N. BORDER REGS ALTERED FOR NATIVE AMERICANS BORN IN CANADA THICKENING OF CAN./ U.S. BORDER IMPACTS ON FIRST NATIONS CANADA CUSTOMS TO EXPAND AT CORNWALL ISLAND? - “NEVER” SAYS GRAND CHIEF MOHAWKS: ARM GUARDS AND WE’LL SHUT THE BORDER HUGE CHALLENGES AHEAD FOR FIRST NATIONS DUTY TO CONSULT NATIVES ADDS TIME, COST, CONFUSION FOR DEVELOPERS IPPERWASH LAND TAKEN OVER BY MILITARY DURING WW-II, RETURNED TO NATIVES APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS URANIUM MINING CURB ON NAVAJO LANDS DAN’S CORNER, ..Protecting our Right to Self-Determination (Border) DEAN’S DEN, ...Celebration of Summer Wulustuk Times: Each month we gather and publish the latest, most current and relevant native information for our readers. Proceeding with this concept, we feel that a well informed person is better able to see, relate with, and assess a situation more accurately when equipped with the right tools. Our aim is to provide the precise tools and the best information possible. Contact You can reach us at Box 3226, Perth-Andover, NB. Canada, E7H 5K3, or at Box 603, Ft. Fairfield, ME 04742. By phone we’re at 506-273-6737 (NB.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Lived Experiences of Local Residents in Muskoka, Ontario: a Case Study on Cottaging
    Understanding The Lived Experiences of Local Residents in Muskoka, Ontario: A Case Study on Cottaging by Ashley Gallant A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Recreation and Leisure Studies (Tourism) Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Ashley Gallant 2017 A AUTHORS DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Muskoka, Ontario, Canada has been recognized as an environment that is appealing for tourism visitation, but more specially cottaging, due to its attractive natural landscape and amenities that are “normally associated with larger cities, while maintaining the lifestyle of a small community” (The District Municipality of Muskoka, 2014). Specifically, for four months of the year, 83, 203 seasonal residents outnumber their 59, 220 permanent counterparts, cultivating a variety of opportunities and challenges in the destination. This particular study, aims to look at tourism in Muskoka in regard to its enhancement of social, economic, and political assets in the destination, and how cottaging impacts the local community from the viewpoint of the permanent resident. Current issues and tensions that exist in Muskoka are drawn upon through secondary data analysis of media articles, government documents, opinion pieces, and 16 semi-structured
    [Show full text]
  • OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020)
    OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020) The information provided in this chart is based on data provided to the OMERS Administration Corporation and is current until December 31, 2020. There are 986 employers on this listing with a total of 288,703 active members (30,067 NRA 60 active members and 258,636 NRA 65 active members). Are you looking for a previous employer to determine your eligibility for membership in the OMERS Primary Pension Plan? If you think your previous employer was an OMERS employer but you don’t see it on this list, contact OMERS Client Services at 416-369-2444 or 1-800-387-0813. Your previous employer could be related to or amalgamated with another OMERS employer and not listed separately here. Number of Active Members Employer Name NRA 60 NRA 65 Total 1627596 ONTARIO INC. * * 519 CHURCH STREET COMMUNITY CENTRE 48 48 AJAX MUNICIPAL HOUSING CORPORATION * * AJAX PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 42 42 ALECTRA ENERGY SERVICES * * ALECTRA ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. * * ALECTRA INC. * * ALECTRA POWER SERVICES INC. * * ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION 1,283 1,283 ALGOMA DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 522 522 ALGOMA DISTRICT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION BOARD 120 120 ALGOMA HEALTH UNIT 178 178 ALGOMA MANOR NURSING HOME 69 69 ALGONQUIN AND LAKESHORE CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 558 558 ALMISE CO-OPERATIVE HOMES INC. * * ALSTOM TRANSPORT CANADA 45 45 APPLEGROVE COMMUNITY COMPLEX * * ART GALLERY OF BURLINGTON * * ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL MANAGERS, CLERKS AND TREASURERS OF * * ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES OF ONTARIO 42 42 ATIKOKAN HYDRO INC * * AU CHATEAU HOME FOR THE AGED 214 214 AVON MAITLAND DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 745 745 AYLMER POLICE SERVICES BOARD * * * BELLEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 29 29 * at least one of NRA 60 or NRA 65 number of active members is less than 25 The information is used for pension administration purposes, and may not be appropriate for other purposes, and is current to December 31, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Land Acquisition Strategies for Simcoe County Forests a Review of Securement Strategies in Ontario
    Identifying Land Acquisition Strategies for Simcoe County Forests A Review of Securement Strategies in Ontario by Anna Ketchum A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Forest Conservation Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design University of Toronto © Copyright by Anna Ketchum 2020 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Graeme Davis and the rest of the forestry staff at the County of Simcoe for the opportunity to learn and work in such an incredible role for my MFC internship and for giving me direction on a research topic for my capstone. Thank you to Dr. Anne Koven for providing guidance, feedback, and support throughout this process. Finally, thank you to my peers and friends in the MFC program for their kindness, camaraderie, and support. 2 EXCUTIVE SUMMARY Simcoe County Forests are municipally owned, and managed forested lands located in Central Ontario, originally established and expanded through the Agreement Forest Program. Historically, Simcoe County acquired and restored marginal agricultural land, known as ‘wastelands’ which were the result of the reduction in forest cover, erosion, and depletion of topsoil by wind and rain. While the restoration of degraded agricultural land and expansion of revenue from timber sales was the initial priority for the acquisition of County Forests, enhancement of natural heritage and recreational opportunities have become increasingly important priorities for the County. Current land acquisition protocols for the County of Simcoe are based on documentation nearly 25 years old, and with the centennial of the County Forests in 2022, land acquisition priorities should be reviewed. With pressure on the County to increase forest lands due to an influx in population and challenges in maintaining wood flow, the review of land acquisition strategies from similar municipalities in Ontario and conservation organization organizations within Simcoe County could provide insight on how the County may align its management of the municipal forest to meet shared goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Prior Social Organization – Continuing Community Confusion Complicates Consultation
    Kichesipirini Algonquin First Nation Prior Social Organization Paula LaPierre Kichesipirini Algonquin First Nation Kichi Sibi Anishnabe / Algonquin Nation Canada By Honouring Our Past We Determine Our Future [email protected] Prior Social Organization – Continuing Community Confusion Complicates Consultation Since it has been established that the purpose of s. 35(1) is to reconcile the prior presence of aboriginal peoples in North America with the assertion of Crown sovereignty, it is clear from this statement that s. 35(1) must recognize and affirm both aspects of that prior presence – first, the occupation of land, and second, the prior social organization and distinctive cultures of aboriginal peoples on that land. 1 Kichesipirini Algonquin First Nation Prior Social Organization Paula LaPierre Kichesipirini Algonquin First Nation Kichi Sibi Anishnabe / Algonquin Nation Canada By Honouring Our Past We Determine Our Future [email protected] Prior Social Organization - Continuing Community Confusion Complicates Consultation The Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada 284 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8 Email: [email protected] Jim Sherratt, Archaeology Review Officer Culture Programs Unit Ministry of Tourism and Culture Email: [email protected] Mr. Kent Kirkpatrick City Manager, 110 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Email: [email protected] February 2, 2011 Dear Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson, Mr. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Jim Sherratt, Re: Communication from City of Ottawa dated January 14, 2011 In the correspondence received from Mayor Jim Watson, City of Ottawa, Mr. Watson states that the City of Ottawa has been in regular communications with the Algonquins of Ontario, and has been working closely with them on all issues regarding the Algonquin land claim and developments within the municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Election: Seat Clusters October Survey Results
    2019 Election: Seat Clusters October Survey Results October 2019 2 Overview In Canada, we count seats, not votes. Just like in American Presidential elections, you can win the popular vote and lose the election. In fact, that happened to Justin Trudeau’s father in 1979. The general way analysts address that is to look at seats by region. However, seats in the same region can move differently. This release tries to get closer to reality in the seat-by-seat contest. Our analysis combines two projects: • An analysis of federal election districts (which we call “seats”) that groups them into 14 clusters based on which parties are most competitive in those seats. Given the shifting dynamics of Canada’s party system, we have relied on only the results of the past two elections. However, to assess where the parties stand in these 14 seat clusters, we need a lot of data. • A merge of the most recent three national surveys that include federal votes, creating an unweighted total of 5,229 respondents and a weighted total of 4,500. In each of our surveys, we collect postal codes. That allows us to create a riding variable for almost all our respondents and to group their responses by riding. The deck to follow shows the output from the analysis. 3 Online Sample Methodology: October 2019 • This report combines the results of two online surveys conducted in October 2019. • In total, the dataset contains a representative sample of n= 4,500 Canadians, 18 years or older. Online samples for the Tracking survey of the surveys were provided by Lucid, while the Ad Testing survey sample was provided by Dynata, both leading providers of online samples.
    [Show full text]