DOCSLIB.ORG

FEBRUARY 2017 Rs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FEBRUARY 2017 Rs Vol. XXXVII, No. 2 ISSN-0970-8693 FEBRUARY 2017 Rs. 20 Editorial : Simultaneous Parliament and State Assembly Elections Simultaneous Parliament and State Not Possible and Against Federalism Assembly Elections - Rajindar Sachar (1) Rajindar Sachar ARTICLES, REPORTS & DOCUMENTS: Prime Minister Modi has for last 6 months kept a continuous refrain for Is the human rights protection regime in India crumbling? - Pushkar Raj (2); Analysis: holding simultaneously Lok Sabha and State Assembly polls and the Sachar Report Gathers Dust, Abolishing supposed advantages that would flow from it. As was to be expected Personal Laws can't Change Dark Realities - number of newspapers and persons are picking up this matter. It is Humra Quraishi (11); Resolution: (Adopted in unfortunate that Election Commission of India and Nite Aayog should the seminar on 'Justice Sachar Committee Report: A Review After 10 Years') (13); PUCL have gone along with this suggestion without even the minimum TN & Pud. State Report read out in the PUCL constitutional requirement of a public debate and Seminars – and more National Convention at Raipur: Appraisal unforgivably without discussions of the matter with other major political Report on the activities carried out during parties and the State governments. In order to have a worthwhile debate, 2014-16 (17). it is necessary to know the legal and factual situation at present. The present life of Lok Sabha expires in May 2019. Modis repeated PRESS STATEMENTS, LETTERS, AND NEWS: emphasis on simultaneous poll is actuated by the realization that the Press Release: NHRC finds 16 women prima mood of exhilaration that he was able to create in 2014 Parliamentary poll facie victims of rape, sexual and physical assault by police personnel in Chhattisgarh is diminishing very fast. The background situation from 2004 – 2014 of (3); Press Statement: PUCL Condemns arrest UPA regime had exposed so much scandals both financial and of FFT Members by Telangana Police and administrative that people were sick of goody but not visible prime unlawfully handing over to Chhattisgarh Police (5); Press Statement by Chhattisgarh Minister Manmohan Singh because of the domination of Indira Gandhi PUCL(6); TN & Pud. PUCL: Press Releases: family. The exposure by the Supreme Court of telecom and Coal (1) PUCL condemning the Arrest of Advocate scandals had made BJP task easier. By itself BJP under leadership of Murugan by TN Police (6); (2) PUCL demands other than Modi (helped fully by RSS) may not have done that well. But Immediate Action against Police (7); PUDR: Open Letter to CJI: Seeking immediate Modi had created an illusion of strong and honest government in Gujarat intervention into the arrest of activists of the that people were willing to ignore or even forget one of the worst period Telangana Democratic (8); PUDR condemn under Modi, namely the state supported mass slaughter of Muslims in the continuing harassment of rights defenders by Chhattisgarh police (13); PUCL 2001. Such was the communal passion aroused by RSS that country TN & Pud.: State Convention on 3-4 which was already disgusted with the corruption and inefficiency of UPA September 2016 (15). government and also heightened by the split amongst the various political parties that Modi romped home with overwhelming majority of Annual Subscription: PUCL Bulletin (w.e.f. January 01, 2017) INDIA seat in Lok Sabha but with just 31% of votes – of course greatly helped PUCL Members Rs. 200 and boosted by corporate funding. Non-Members Rs. 240 That illusion has now been exposed. Even ardent supporters of Modi now Libraries, Institutions Rs. 300 do not place hundred percent bet on Modi winning Lok Sabha polls in OVERSEAS PUCL Members US$50 2019 - that is why the effort of Modi to work out a strategy so as to keep his Non-Members US$100 rivals also caught up with State Assembly polls so as not to put combined Libraries, Institutions US$120 pressure on him in Lok Sabha Polls. But this strategy of Modi is not constitutionally possible. After emergency, Constitution (44th Amendment) has provided in Article 83 and Article 172, of the Constitution that Lok Sabha and State Legislatures of the State shall continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no longer. Thus the factual situation at present will show that it is constitutionally not possible to hold simultaneous polls in May 2019. 417 PUCL BULLETIN, FEBRUARY 2017 1 This is because it would require to willing why is he trying cover his parliament. Both legislatures derive extend the term of Sates government failure by conjuring up powers from the same Constitution. Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh these illusory undemocratic Within its appointed sphere, the and Rajasthan (by 5 months), solutions. State Legislature has plenary Mizoram (by 6 months) and But a greater principle of powers”. Karnataka (by 12 months) which is d e m o c r a c y i s i n v o l v e d i n Modi wants to deny this strategic not constitutionally possible. Of simultaneous polls of parliament advantage of States and weaken course the terms of Haryana and and state assemblies unless by decentralization which is the core of Maharashtra (by 5 months), fortuitous circumstances the five our constitutional jurisprudence. Jharkhand (by 7 month) excepting year period of parliament and State Examples of other countries like NCT f Delhi (by 8 months) could be Assemblies happen to coincide on U.S.A. and Europe would also curtailed as these states are BJP its own. This contrived situation show that it is constitutionally government, but Delhi would not trying to be brought up by Modi has recognized that the priorities and agree. very dangerous implication and interests of State in day to day Punjab, U.P. must go to polls in the against the basic structure of our governance are emphasized next 2 months - obviously no one constitution which is impermissible. differently. Thus in U.S.A a rather can expect Tamil Nadu, Bihar, J & According to Supreme Court of extreme position prevails that law K, West Bengal and Kerala all India Article 1(1) India is a Union of and Medical degrees of one state opposition parties to agree whose States which means a federation of are not even recognized in the rest terms are upto 2021. Assam can States. of States. As far elections they have go to polls in 2019 though due in Our constitution specifically different laws in each state. They 2021 as they are BJP - will Modi provides exclusive list – I have separate laws for poll for agree to curtail its term where BJP e m p o w e r i n g t h e C e n t r a l Presidents election and separate has for the first time come to power. government which alone can for Senate and House of Non BJP states like Tamil Nadu, legislate on certain subjects in list-I representatives and also separate West Bengal whose terms expirers in Seventh Schedule. The States for various states. Of course this is by2021 will never agree to curtail alone can legislate List - II - an extreme example borne their period terms. The Central Parliament cannot. Both Centre possibly of history of USA which government whose terms would and State can legislate in List - III. had Civil War. expire by 2019 cannot continue State List - II includes very We wisely did not go so far. Also the thereafter without holding fresh important subjects like Agriculture, distinction between the priorities of elections due in May 2019. law and order ......on which only Centre and the states are different. If however Modi is so keen on state can legislate and Centre has The sooner Modi relinquishes this holding simultaneous polls even no jurisdiction. Obviously voters idea of simultaneous poll it is better. with some States he can hold it have different aspects, priorities This gives unfair advantage to along by dissolving Parliament in when voting for State Assemblies national parties as against state 2017 and then hold simultaneous or Parliament. In Delhi laws Act the parties and distorts the sentiment of polls by dissolving also at same Supreme Court of India (1951) voters that government be close to time BJP Sate Assemblies whose specifically held; “The State the people of area concerned. terms are not yet over as legislature under our Constitution is Dated: 29/12/2016 q mentioned above. If Modi is not not a delegate of the union Is the human rights protection regime in India crumbling? Pushkar Raj The recent summoning of Geneva world conference on promotion of human rights was to Chhattisgarh officials by the human rights in 1993. be carried out in the country under N a t i o n a l H u m a n R i g h t s Consequently, the Protection of the leadership of NHRC, headed by Commissions (NHRC) for abuse of Human Rights Act (PHRA) was a retired chief justice of the power is significant as it underlines passed by the parliament in 1993 Supreme Court. This, however, has expectations from the human rights for “better protection of human not been realized as is evident from protection institutions in the country rights” in the country. As a result, a the Supreme Court's observation in to deliver on their mandate on national level commission was set Extra Judicial Execution Victim which they have been lacking up at the center with the provision Families Association versus Union lately. f o r S t a t e H u m a n R i g h t s of India case in July this year when Like in many other countries, the Commissions (SHRC) in the states.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime”
    India “Being Neutral HUMAN RIGHTS is Our Biggest Crime” WATCH Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Copyright © 2008 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-356-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2008 1-56432-356-0 “Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” Government, Vigilante, and Naxalite Abuses in India’s Chhattisgarh State Maps........................................................................................................................ 1 Glossary/ Abbreviations ..........................................................................................3 I. Summary.............................................................................................................5 Government and Salwa Judum abuses ................................................................7 Abuses by Naxalites..........................................................................................10 Key Recommendations: The need for protection and accountability..................
    [Show full text]
  • Bastar, Maoism and Salwa Judum.” in Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XLI 29, July 22, 2006, Pp
    Bastar, Maoism and Salwa Judum.” In Economic and Political Weekly, Vol XLI 29, July 22, 2006, pp. 3187-3192 Bastar, Maoism and Salwa Judum Nandini Sundar1 Visitors to the official Bastar website (www.bastar.nic.in) will ‘discover’ that Gonds “have pro- fertility mentality”, that “marriages...between brothers and sisters are common,” and that “the Murias prefer 'Mahua' drinks rather than medicines for their ailments.” “The tribals of this area”, says the website, “is famous for their 'Ghotuls' where the prospective couples do the 'dating' and have free sex also.” As for the Abhuj Marias, “(t)hese people are not cleanly in their habits, and even when a Maria does bathe he does not wash his solitary garments but leaves it on the bank. When drinking from a stream they do not take up water in their hands but put their mouth down to it like cattle.” Some of the tribals are “leading a savage life”, we are told, “they do not like to come to the outer world and mingle with the modern civilisation.” Into this charming picture of ‘savages’ who ‘shoot down strangers with arrows’, one must unfortunately bring in a few uncomfortable facts. What used to be the former undivided district of Bastar (since 2001 carved into the districts of Dantewada, Bastar and Kanker) is currently a war zone. The main roads, in Dantewada in particular, but also in parts of Bastar and Kanker, are full of CRPF and other security personnel, out on combing operations.2 The Maoists control the jungles. In the frontlines of this battle are ordinary villagers who are being pitted against each other on a scale unparalleled in the history of Indian counterinsurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Naxalite Insurgency: History, Trajectory, and Implications for U.S
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 22 India’s Naxalite Insurgency: History, Trajectory, and Implications for U.S.-India Security Cooperation on Domestic Counterinsurgency by Thomas F. Lynch III Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for Technology and National Security Policy. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Hard-line communists, belonging to the political group Naxalite, pose with bows and arrows during protest rally in eastern Indian city of Calcutta December 15, 2004. More than 5,000 Naxalites from across the country, including the Maoist Communist Centre and the Peoples War, took part in a rally to protest against the government’s economic policies (REUTERS/Jayanta Shaw) India’s Naxalite Insurgency India’s Naxalite Insurgency: History, Trajectory, and Implications for U.S.-India Security Cooperation on Domestic Counterinsurgency By Thomas F. Lynch III Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurgency, Counter-Insurgency, and Democracy in Central India
    CHAPTER 9 Insurgency, Counter-insurgency, and Democracy in Central India NANDINI SUNDAR The Naxalite movement began in India in the late 1960s as a peasant struggle (in Naxalbari, West Bengal, hence the name Naxalite). It represented the revolutionary stream of Indian Marxism which did not believe that parliamentary democracy would lead to the requisite systemic change and argued for armed struggle instead. While the Indian state managed to crush the movement in the 1970s, causing an already ideologically fractured movement to splinter further (currently 34 parties by official estimates),1 in 2004 two of the major parties, the Communist Party of India (CPI) (Marxist-Leninist) People’s War (formed out of the merger of the People’s War Group with Party Unity) and the Maoist Communist Center (MCC) of India, united to form the Communist Party of India (Maoist).2 The CPI (Maoist) is currently a significant political force across several states, especially in rural areas where state services have been inadequate or absent.3 Since about 2005-6, the Maoists have become the main target of the Indian state, with thousands of paramilitary forces being poured into the areas where they are strong, and the prime minister repeatedly referring to them as India’s biggest security threat. As a consequence, armed conflict is occurring across large parts of central India and is taking several hundred lives on an annual basis. In the state of Chhattisgarh, which is the epicentre of the war, sovereignty is contested over large parts of terrain. COMPETING PERSPECTIVES ON THE MAOIST ISSUE There are three main perspectives on the Maoist issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Past Drive Marginalized Communities Towards Radicalization?
    Does The Past Drive Marginalized Communities Towards Radicalization? Women of the Gond tribe. (photographed by the author)Last month, the Indian Air Force announced that the MI-17 helicopters it has deployed in Bastar, a district in the southern part of the state of Chhattisgarh, will engage in retaliatory fire against members of the insurgent Naxalite movement so that troops can defend themselves while carrying out rescue operations. Such action can be seen as an extension of what the Indian media terms Operation Green Hunt, the aggressively offensive stance the government and paramilitary forces have taken have taken since 2009 to combat the growth of Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) across roughly five Central, Southern, and Eastern states – a region often referred to as the Red Corridor. The growth of LWE is considered one of the India’s most critical domestic issues and one that, in 2010, then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh declared as the country’s biggest internal security challenge. While the LWE movement itself is multifarious, consisting of numerous groups and coalitions across the entire country, the Naxalites, formally known as The Communist Party of India (Maoist), and particularly their factions based in Bastar, have received a great deal of media attention. This has increased significantly following a violent incident in 2013, when the outfit attacked a motorcade of politicians in Dharba Valley in Chhattisgarh. The assault killed at least 18 Indian National Congress members and party workers, including Mahendra Karma, founder of the Salwa Judum anti-insurgency militia. For several years the government has sought to mitigate conflict nationally vis-à-vis institution building and restorative justice; in 2006, the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs inaugurated its Division, which was tasked with initiating to improve education and medical infrastructure, and security procedures in remote areas of the country affected by the burgeoning Maoist movement.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIA'scontemporary Security Challenges
    Contemporary Security INDIA’S Challenges Edited by Michael Kugelman INDIa’s Contemporary SECURITY CHALLENGES Essays by: Bethany Danyluk Michael Kugelman Dinshaw Mistry Arun Prakash P.V. Ramana Siddharth Srivastava Nandini Sundar Andrew C. Winner Edited by: Michael Kugelman ©2011 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org Available from : Asia Program Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org ISBN 1-933549-79-3 The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, es- tablished by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mis- sion is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan institution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publi- cations and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advi- sory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. The Center is the publisher of The Wilson Quarterly and home of Woodrow Wilson Center Press, dialogue radio and television, and the monthly news-letter “Centerpoint.” For more information about the Center’s activities and publications, please visit us on the web at www.wilsoncenter.org.
    [Show full text]
  • SALWA JUDUM Captured Naxalite Political Agents, Known As Sangam, for the Guardian to Interview
    his right hand Ajay Singh, and others like him are engaged in executing the work-plan issued from the office of the then IG MW Ansari. (It is thus only just, that Ajay Singh has since been wiped out for his heinous crimes against the tribals.) The Guardian has reported: “While the soldiers say villagers come seeking refuge from the violence, the tribals tell a different story. They claim that the camps are, in reality, prisons.The guards in Bhairamgarh camp brought out SALWA JUDUM captured Naxalite political agents, known as Sangam, for the Guardian to interview. Each told a story of state-backed terror. A mob of government supporters invaded their village backed by armed soldiers who opened fire on “Naxalite houses”. A battle ensued and the guerrillas, outgunned, fled. Once an area has been “cleansed”, the homes of those used by leftwing guerrillas are destroyed and “I was a Sangam. A People were getting shot and homes burnt every day. I had no choice but to come here,” said Buddram, who used to farm around Kotrapal. Clutching her baby to her chest, Jamli recounts how the Salva Judum ‘NEW FRONT’ militia kidnapped her and seven friends as they travelled to a market. “We were told we had to come to the police station. Once we reached OF there we were kept overnight and driven to this camp where we were told if you leave you will be killed,” she said. “I was alone until my husband arrived a week later and he is trapped here too. We are not ‘HIDDEN WAR’ Naxalites.
    [Show full text]
  • “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’S Maoist Conflict WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict WATCH “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-920-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JULY 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-920-8 “Between Two Sets of Guns” Attacks on Civil Society Activists in India’s Maoist Conflict Map of India ................................................................................................................................ ii Summary ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paper by Anil Kambho
    NAXALITE INSURGENCY IN INDIA - CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES Anil Kamboj Introduction The genesis of the naxalite insurgency in India is rooted in peasants’ movement and agrarian discontent. The movement began in March 1967 when a group of revolutionaries led by Charu Mazumdar and Kanu Sanyal launched a peasants uprising at Naxalbari after a tribal youth, who had a judicial order to plough his land, was attacked by the goons of local landlords. The tribals retaliated and refused to part with the land owner’s share of their produce and lifted the entire stock from his granary. It ignited a fire that spread in the state. This was brought down by use of force and simultaneously bringing in some land reforms by the state government and could be termed as phase one of the movement. Later on, the phase two of the Naxal movement spread to 9 states that is, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh; posing a challenge to the nation. In the pre- dominantly tribal areas, naxals hold Kangaroo courts; impose levis on contractors, mine owners, businessmen and even on government officials. The movement has thrown up leaders, a legion of workers and sympathisers who believed that guerrilla warfare tactic would liberate India. The ‘Red Corridor’ stretching from Nepal through some of the most backward regions of the country up to Andhra Pradesh and even up to Tamil Nadu, is the territory where the Naxalites take on the state might on a daily basis. But what do the Naxals want to achieve? Their first aim is to establish a base area inside the Dandakaranya forest, spanning Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Orrisa and part of Maharashtra.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Green Hunt
    Operation Green Hunt -a perspective of political economy Anand Teltumbde Convention on Operation Green Hunt and Democratic Rights Mumbai 16 January 2010 is the single biggest internal “Naxalism security challenge” Singh,ever Primefaced Minister by our in 2006 country Manmohan - Dr. “Naxalism is the greatest internal security threat to India” … and to development” - Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister in 2009 - are nothing” but cold “Naxalites blooded murders -Advt. issued by the Home Ministry Threat to Internal Security of Rural India of Poor Peasants, INDIA Farmers, Landless labourers, Dalits, Adivasis…? ? Urban India of Slum and pavementWhich IndiaDwellers, Casual Workers, Contract Laboureres, … ? Middle India of swelling Middle Classes? Corporate India of Corporate Honchos? Globalizing India of Dollar Millionaires and Billionaires? Surely, it is a Threat to the India of handful Globalist Elites! Nothing but cold-blooded murderers… Human life is sacred No one can and should defend destruction of human life True, huge loss of life has taken place in Naxal conflict … both by Maoists and Security Personnel Statistics show comparable figures of Killings by both.. According to Chhattisgarh Police, In 2008, 212 people were killed.. 63 Sec. and 52 Naxals.. In 2007, 369 people were killed.. 124 Sec. and 64 Naxals… In 2006, 385 people were killed… 39 Sec. and 69 Naxals… Civilian casualty is far more and who did it is not known! Nothing but cold-blooded murderers…. What about Fake encounters? Custodial deaths? Extra-judicial killings? and Structural
    [Show full text]
  • The Maoist Attack in Chhattisgarh
    ISAS Insights No. 205 – 31 May 2013 469A Bukit Timah Road #07-01, Tower Block, Singapore 259770 Tel: 6516 6179 / 6516 4239 Fax: 6776 7505 / 6314 5447 Email: [email protected] Website: www.isas.nus.edu.sg The Maoist Attack in Chhattisgarh Ronojoy Sen and Robin Jeffrey 1 The ambush of a convoy of cars returning from a political rally and the murder of 27 people on 25 May 2013 in Chhattisgarh state in central India brings together various threads that make up “the Maoist movement” that has been an intermittent feature of rural life for 50 years. The list of victims makes this clear. Among the dead were the leader of the Congress Party in Chhattisgarh state, Nand Kumar Patel, and Mahendra Karma. Karma was the architect of the Salwa Judum, a controversial and bloody movement of anti-Maoist vigilantes begun in 2005 and later declared illegal by the Indian Supreme Court. Not surprisingly, Karma was high on the Maoists’ hit list. Among the wounded is V C Shukla, 83, from an old Congress family and the reviled Minister of Information and Broadcasting during Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s 1975-7 “emergency”. The Motive The Maoists in a statement on 28 May claimed that the primary aim behind the attack was to kill Karma. It also said the attack was “revenge” for the federal government’s ‘Operation Green Hunt’ targeting the Maoists. To the government of Chhattisgarh, however, the Salwa Judum was perfectly legal and performed an admirable public function. A former chief of the 1 Dr Ronojoy Sen is Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies (ISAS), an autonomous research institute at the National University of Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • 08 Eric Scanlon DOI.Indd
    Asian Journal of Peacebuilding Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): 335-351 doi: 10.18588/201811.00a038 Research Note Fifty-One Years of Naxalite-Maoist Insurgency in India: Examining the Factors that Have Influenced the Longevity of the Conflict Eric Scanlon The Naxalite-Maoist uprising in India has for fifty-one years continued almost unabated. Today Maoist rebels have a substantial presence in at least ten of India’s twenty-nine states and the Indian government has repeatedly stated that it remains the most potent threat to stability that the Indian state faces. This research note examines the existing literature and local primary sources to explore the economic, social, and military factors that have influenced the longevity of this conflict. It details how a fifty-one year conflict has continued almost unmitigated in a country that has the military might that India commands. Keywords India, Naxalites, Maoism, conflict, longevity Introduction May 2018 marked the fifty-first anniversary of the peasant revolt in a little village called Naxalbari, in the Indian state of West Bengal. What seemed like a local uprising soon spread rapidly throughout India and took on a Marxist and Maoist character. As the uprising began in Naxalbari, the insurgents were nicknamed Naxalites, a name which has stuck to this day. The Maoist rebellion has continued almost unabated and today Maoist rebels have a significant presence in ten of India’s twenty-nine states (Ministry of Home Affairs 2016). At the height of the Naxalite rebellion in the 2000s it is estimated that they controlled nearly 10 million hectares of mainly forested land.
    [Show full text]